Microsoft AZ-140 Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Microsoft AZ-140 Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-140 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 91

You want to provide task workers with access to specific applications in Azure Virtual Desktop without giving them full desktop access. Which deployment method should you use?

A) RemoteApp programs
B) Personal host pool
C) Pooled host pool
D) ARM template

Answer: A) RemoteApp programs

Explanation:

RemoteApp programs offer a targeted approach to application delivery within Azure Virtual Desktop, allowing administrators to provide users access only to the specific applications they need rather than giving them a complete virtual desktop environment. This approach is particularly well-suited for task workers whose responsibilities revolve around a limited set of applications, such as productivity tools, line-of-business applications, or specialized software. By publishing only the required applications, administrators can significantly reduce the attack surface, limit potential security risks, and ensure that users do not have access to unnecessary system components or administrative features. Additionally, RemoteApp programs help optimize resource usage because session hosts are not required to allocate resources for full desktop environments, allowing the infrastructure to support more users efficiently.

One of the primary advantages of RemoteApp programs is their flexibility in access. Users can connect to the published applications through multiple clients, including the Remote Desktop client for Windows, macOS, or mobile devices, as well as through the HTML5 web client, which provides access from virtually any device with a modern web browser. This cross-platform availability ensures that users can continue their work seamlessly, whether they are in the office, working remotely, or using personal devices. The ability to deliver only the applications that are necessary also simplifies user training, as individuals interact only with the tools relevant to their roles, which can improve productivity and reduce the likelihood of accidental misconfigurations or errors.

In contrast, personal host pools are designed to provide users with dedicated desktops, offering the complete desktop environment and personal session state. While this model is ideal for knowledge workers or users who require a persistent workspace and extensive customization, it is often excessive for task workers who only need access to a limited set of applications. Deploying personal desktops for these users would not only increase infrastructure costs but also add administrative overhead, as IT staff would need to manage and maintain multiple dedicated virtual desktops, including updates, patches, and security configurations.

Pooled host pools provide a cost-effective solution by allowing multiple users to share session hosts. This approach is efficient and scalable, but by default, pooled hosts provide access to full desktops rather than individual applications. To restrict users to only the applications they require, RemoteApp programs must be implemented on top of pooled host pools. This combination allows organizations to maintain the cost benefits of pooling while still delivering a targeted and secure application experience to task workers.

While ARM templates are valuable for automating the deployment of session hosts, host pools, and other Azure resources, they do not control which applications a user can access. ARM templates are primarily deployment and configuration tools rather than access management solutions, meaning they cannot replace the functionality provided by RemoteApp programs.

Overall, RemoteApp programs represent the most appropriate solution for delivering application-level access in Azure Virtual Desktop. By providing only the tools that task workers need, administrators can enhance security, reduce resource consumption, and simplify user experience. This targeted approach ensures that users remain productive without unnecessary permissions or exposure to full desktops, creating a more efficient and manageable virtual desktop environment.

Question 92

You want to automatically scale Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts based on user activity to optimize costs and performance. Which feature should you implement?

A) Autoscale for host pools
B) Azure Monitor Alerts
C) Azure Advisor
D) Azure Policy

Answer: A) Autoscale for host pools

Explanation:

Autoscale for host pools in Azure provides a highly efficient and automated method for managing the number of session hosts within an Azure Virtual Desktop environment. It enables dynamic scaling of resources based on actual user demand, pre-defined schedules, or specific performance metrics, ensuring that the environment remains responsive and cost-effective. By automatically adding additional session hosts during periods of high activity, autoscale ensures that users experience consistent performance without delays or resource contention. Conversely, during times of low usage, it can scale in by removing idle hosts, helping organizations avoid unnecessary expenses associated with maintaining underutilized infrastructure. This dynamic adjustment not only optimizes resource utilization but also helps maintain predictable operational costs, making it an essential tool for organizations with fluctuating workloads.

The autoscale functionality is highly flexible and can be configured to respond to various triggers. Administrators can set thresholds based on active session counts, CPU usage, memory utilization, or other custom metrics relevant to their workload. Additionally, autoscale can operate on scheduled time frames, allowing organizations to align resource availability with expected usage patterns, such as business hours or specific project cycles. By automating this process, administrators are freed from the manual task of adding or removing session hosts, which improves operational efficiency and reduces the potential for human error. This level of automation is particularly valuable in environments where workload patterns are unpredictable or change frequently, as it ensures that performance standards are consistently met without over-provisioning resources.

While Azure offers other tools for monitoring and managing resources, they do not provide the same level of automated operational control as autoscale. Azure Monitor Alerts, for instance, can notify administrators when certain metrics exceed defined thresholds, such as high CPU or memory usage. Although alerts are useful for raising awareness of potential performance issues, they are inherently reactive. Administrators must manually respond to these alerts to adjust resources, which can introduce delays and risk affecting user experience during periods of high demand. Unlike autoscale, Azure Monitor Alerts do not automatically provision or remove session hosts in response to changing conditions.

Azure Advisor provides valuable recommendations on cost optimization, security enhancements, and performance improvements. It can suggest resizing or scaling resources to improve efficiency, but it does not directly implement these changes. Its primary function is advisory, offering guidance rather than automated operational adjustments. Similarly, Azure Policy is focused on enforcing compliance and governance standards across an organization’s resources. While it ensures that deployments adhere to organizational rules, it does not dynamically adjust resource capacity or respond to changes in workload demand. Its utility lies in configuration enforcement, not operational automation.

In contrast, autoscale for host pools directly addresses both performance and cost efficiency by automating resource management. It ensures that session hosts are available when needed, maintaining a responsive user experience, while reducing idle resources during quieter periods. This automation simplifies administration, reduces operational overhead, and allows organizations to optimize infrastructure costs without compromising performance. By intelligently matching resource capacity to actual demand, autoscale provides a proactive, reliable, and scalable solution for managing Azure Virtual Desktop environments, making it the optimal choice for organizations seeking efficient and automated resource management.

Question 93

You want to ensure users’ profiles remain consistent across multiple session hosts in a pooled Azure Virtual Desktop environment. Which solution should you implement?

A) FSLogix Profile Containers
B) Roaming Profiles
C) OneDrive for Business
D) Azure Files

Answer: A) FSLogix Profile Containers

Explanation:

FSLogix Profile Containers store user profiles in VHD/VHDX disks that are dynamically mounted when a user logs into a session host. This ensures consistent settings, application configurations, and personal files across multiple hosts. FSLogix is optimized for multi-session environments, reduces login times, and prevents profile corruption. Integration with Office 365 applications allows seamless experiences across Outlook, Teams, and OneDrive, providing users with a familiar and uninterrupted workspace.

Roaming Profiles attempt to copy profiles between session hosts at login and logout, which can be slow and error-prone, particularly with large profiles. This method is not optimized for cloud or multi-session environments.

OneDrive for Business provides file storage synchronization but does not manage full Windows profiles, so settings and application configurations might be inconsistent across hosts.

Azure Files can host profiles on network shares, but loading large profiles over the network can increase login times and is less efficient than FSLogix.

FSLogix Profile Containers is the correct solution because it ensures fast, reliable, and consistent access to user profiles across pooled session hosts, maintaining a seamless user experience.

Question 94

You want to restrict access to Azure Virtual Desktop to devices that meet organizational security standards and require multi-factor authentication. Which feature should you configure?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Azure Firewall
C) Network Security Groups
D) Role-Based Access Control

Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure Active Directory Conditional Access is a powerful tool that enables organizations to enforce security policies that regulate access to cloud resources, including Azure Virtual Desktop, based on multiple factors. By leveraging Conditional Access, administrators can establish rules that consider device compliance, user risk, geographic location, and the strength of authentication methods. This capability allows organizations to create a security framework that balances strong protection with the flexibility required for modern work environments, ensuring that only authorized users on secure and compliant devices can access critical applications and data.

One of the key benefits of Conditional Access is its ability to enforce device compliance. Administrators can configure policies to ensure that only devices managed by the organization and meeting specific compliance standards can connect. These standards may include having the latest security updates installed, running endpoint protection software, or adhering to encryption requirements. For devices that are not compliant or unmanaged, policies can require additional authentication measures, such as multi-factor authentication, to reduce the risk of unauthorized access. This approach ensures that users connecting from potentially insecure devices are subjected to higher scrutiny, protecting sensitive organizational information from potential threats.

Conditional Access also allows organizations to implement policies that are tailored to specific user groups, locations, or applications. For example, access to certain resources can be restricted based on the user’s role within the organization, their location, or the type of device being used. This granularity ensures that access policies are precise, targeting potential risks without unnecessarily restricting legitimate users. By combining identity verification with contextual factors, Conditional Access provides a layered defense strategy that strengthens security while maintaining usability and productivity.

While other Azure security tools offer valuable protections, they do not provide the same level of identity- and device-focused control as Conditional Access. Azure Firewall, for instance, protects network boundaries by filtering inbound and outbound traffic based on rules, but does not evaluate the compliance of individual devices or enforce multi-factor authentication. Similarly, Network Security Groups allow administrators to manage traffic flow to and from Azure resources, but they cannot assess the security posture of a device or the risk level associated with a user. Role-Based Access Control defines which users can access specific resources and the actions they can perform, yet it does not enforce compliance or authentication policies. These tools are essential for network security and resource management, but they lack the contextual, identity-driven enforcement provided by Conditional Access.

By using Azure AD Conditional Access, organizations can implement a proactive security model that ensures only trusted and compliant users are allowed to access Azure Virtual Desktop. Policies can be dynamically applied based on real-time signals, providing security without disrupting user workflows. This approach reduces the risk of data breaches, ensures adherence to organizational compliance requirements, and strengthens overall security posture. Conditional Access integrates seamlessly with Azure Virtual Desktop, enabling organizations to protect remote work environments effectively while allowing secure, flexible access. With its ability to combine identity, device, and contextual factors, Conditional Access is the ideal solution for organizations seeking to enforce robust security policies and safeguard critical resources in a scalable and manageable way.

Question 95

You want to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts that support GPU-intensive workloads such as 3D modeling and AI simulations. Which VM series should you select?

A) NV-series
B) B-series
C) D-series
D) A-series

Answer: A) NV-series

Explanation:

NV-series virtual machines are specifically designed to meet the demands of graphics-intensive workloads in cloud environments, providing dedicated NVIDIA GPUs that deliver high-performance graphical processing. These virtual machines are particularly well-suited for applications that require substantial GPU resources, such as 3D modeling, computer-aided design (CAD), artificial intelligence simulations, and advanced visualization tasks. By offering dedicated GPU acceleration, NV-series VMs ensure that users experience smooth, responsive performance even when working with resource-heavy applications, which is crucial for professionals who rely on high-fidelity graphics for their daily tasks.

One of the major advantages of NV-series VMs is their optimization for multi-session environments, such as Azure Virtual Desktop. In these scenarios, multiple users share the same virtual infrastructure, but each requires access to GPU resources for their applications. NV-series machines are designed to allocate and manage GPU resources effectively across multiple sessions, ensuring that every user benefits from consistent performance without degradation. This capability makes the NV-series ideal for design teams, engineers, data scientists, and other professionals who rely on graphics-intensive software and need a reliable virtualized environment to maintain productivity.

In comparison, other Azure virtual machine series are less suitable for high-performance graphics workloads. B-series VMs, for example, are general-purpose, burstable virtual machines that provide flexible CPU performance for workloads with variable demand. While they are cost-effective and capable of handling light or intermittent workloads, B-series VMs lack dedicated GPU resources, making them unsuitable for applications that rely heavily on graphical processing. Users attempting to run 3D modeling or visualization tasks on B-series VMs would likely encounter poor performance, long rendering times, and an overall subpar experience.

D-series VMs offer balanced CPU and memory resources for general-purpose workloads, providing a reliable environment for business applications, databases, and development tasks. Although D-series machines are powerful for general computing, they do not include GPU acceleration. As a result, they are not capable of supporting high-performance graphics applications effectively. Running complex visualization, AI simulations, or CAD programs on D-series VMs would be inefficient and could negatively impact productivity, particularly in multi-user environments where GPU demand is high.

A-series virtual machines are an older generation of general-purpose VMs within Azure. These legacy machines provide basic CPU and memory resources and can handle standard business workloads, but they are not optimized for modern GPU-intensive tasks. Their limited performance makes them inadequate for scenarios that require advanced graphics processing, and they are generally less efficient and slower compared to NV-series VMs when running resource-intensive applications.

For organizations deploying Azure Virtual Desktop and requiring high-performance graphics capabilities, NV-series virtual machines are the ideal choice. They provide dedicated GPU resources, support multiple simultaneous users, and ensure that resource-intensive applications run smoothly. By delivering responsive performance and reliable GPU acceleration, NV-series VMs enable professionals to work efficiently on demanding tasks such as 3D modeling, CAD, and AI simulations, making them the optimal solution for graphics-intensive virtual desktop environments.

Question 96

You want to ensure that new Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts automatically register with the host pool during deployment. Which method should you use?

A) Registration token
B) Custom script extension
C) User-assigned managed identity
D) Azure Policy

Answer: A) Registration token

Explanation:

In modern Azure Virtual Desktop environments, deploying session hosts efficiently and securely is essential for ensuring smooth operations and minimizing administrative overhead. One of the most effective mechanisms for achieving this is the use of a registration token. A registration token serves as a secure credential that allows session hosts to authenticate and automatically register with a designated host pool during deployment. By embedding the token within the session host setup process, virtual machines can join the specified host pool without requiring manual configuration, simplifying the deployment workflow and ensuring that new hosts are immediately available for users.

The primary advantage of using a registration token lies in the automation it provides. In large-scale environments, where multiple session hosts may be deployed simultaneously, manually registering each host with the appropriate host pool can be labor-intensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. Registration tokens eliminate this need for manual intervention, enabling administrators to deploy hosts quickly and reliably. This automated registration ensures that end users can access newly deployed session hosts without delay, maintaining business continuity and providing a seamless user experience.

Security is another critical benefit of registration tokens. Tokens are time-limited, meaning they expire after a predefined period. This reduces the risk of unauthorized registrations and ensures that only the intended hosts can connect to the host pool during the deployment window. The time-bound nature of these tokens provides a safeguard against potential security breaches, while still allowing the convenience of automated deployment. This balance between security and automation makes registration tokens a robust solution for managing session host registration in dynamic cloud environments.

Alternative methods exist for configuring session hosts, but they do not provide the same level of secure, automated registration. Custom script extensions, for example, allow administrators to execute scripts on virtual machines after deployment. While these scripts can perform a variety of configuration tasks, they do not inherently authenticate session hosts with a host pool. Using scripts for registration would require additional configuration steps and ongoing maintenance, which increases administrative complexity and the potential for errors. Similarly, user-assigned managed identities allow virtual machines to access other Azure resources securely without storing credentials, but they do not manage the registration process for host pools, limiting their usefulness in this context. Azure Policy, on the other hand, enforces compliance and governance rules across Azure resources but does not perform authentication or host registration. Policies focus on maintaining standardization and ensuring compliance rather than operational deployment tasks.

By contrast, registration tokens provide a direct, purpose-built solution for this specific challenge. They combine automation, security, and simplicity, allowing session hosts to be deployed at scale while ensuring immediate usability for end users. With registration tokens, administrators can confidently deploy new session hosts, knowing that the hosts will automatically join the correct host pool and be ready for use, all without the need for manual intervention or complex scripting.

Registration tokens are the ideal mechanism for registering Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts. They streamline the deployment process, reduce administrative workload, ensure rapid availability for users, and maintain security through time-limited credentials. By leveraging registration tokens, organizations can achieve efficient, secure, and automated session host deployment, supporting seamless operations and enhancing the overall Azure Virtual Desktop experience.

Question 97

You want to monitor CPU, memory, and disk usage of Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts and receive alerts when thresholds are exceeded. Which service should you use?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Remote Desktop client
C) Windows Admin Center
D) Log Analytics workspace only

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor provides centralized performance monitoring for Azure resources, including session hosts. It collects metrics such as CPU, memory, disk, and network usage and allows administrators to configure alerts when specified thresholds are exceeded. This proactive monitoring helps maintain performance, identify potential bottlenecks, and take corrective action before users experience issues. Integration with Log Analytics enables detailed dashboards, queries, and historical analysis, supporting efficient troubleshooting and operational insights.

ReThe mote Desktop client allows users to connect to desktops and applications, but does not provide performance monitoring or alerting capabilities.

Windows Admin Center offers management for individual VMs and services, but does not provide centralized monitoring or automated alerts for multiple session hosts in Azure Virtual Desktop.

Log Analytics workspace stores logs and metrics, but does not independently provide alerts or automated monitoring without integration with Azure Monitor.

Azure Monitor is the correct solution because it offers comprehensive, automated monitoring and alerting for session hosts, ensuring optimal performance and operational efficiency.

Question 98

You want to provide users with consistent profiles across multiple session hosts in a pooled Azure Virtual Desktop environment while reducing login times. Which solution should you implement?

A) FSLogix Profile Containers
B) Roaming Profiles
C) OneDrive for Business
D) Azure Files

Answer: A) FSLogix Profile Containers

Explanation:

FSLogix Profile Containers store user profiles in VHD/VHDX disks that are dynamically attached during login. This ensures that users have consistent settings, application configurations, and personal files across all session hosts. The approach significantly reduces login times compared to traditional roaming profiles, which copy data at login and logout. FSLogix is optimized for multi-session environments, preventing profile corruption and integrating seamlessly with Office 365 applications such as Outlook and Teams, providing users with a consistent experience regardless of the host.

Roaming Profiles copy profile data between hosts, but can be slow, error-prone, and inefficient for large profiles.

OneDrive for Business allows file synchronization but does not handle full desktop profiles, meaning desktop settings and application configurations may vary between session hosts.

Azure Files can host profiles on network shares, but loading large profiles over the network is slower and less efficient than FSLogix.

FSLogix Profile Containers are the correct solution because they optimize logon times, ensure profile consistency, and maintain a seamless user experience across pooled session hosts.

Question 99

You want to restrict access to Azure Virtual Desktop so that only devices meeting organizational security requirements can connect, and users must complete multi-factor authentication if required. Which feature should you configure?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Azure Firewall
C) Network Security Groups
D) Role-Based Access Control

Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access provides a robust and flexible framework for securing access to cloud-based resources, including Azure Virtual Desktop, by evaluating a combination of user identity, device compliance, location, and authentication strength. It enables administrators to define policies that ensure only trusted users on secure devices are allowed to connect to sensitive organizational resources. These policies can require devices to meet specific compliance standards, such as having updated operating systems, active endpoint protection, or encryption enabled. Additionally, Conditional Access can enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk sign-ins or when users access resources from unmanaged or unfamiliar devices, adding an extra layer of protection against unauthorized access.

The strength of Conditional Access lies in its granularity and flexibility. Policies can be configured to apply to specific user groups, devices, or locations, allowing organizations to balance security with usability. For instance, employees accessing Azure Virtual Desktop from corporate-managed devices in trusted locations may have a seamless login experience, while those signing in from personal devices or unknown networks may be prompted for MFA or restricted access until compliance requirements are met. This context-aware approach enables organizations to protect sensitive data without unnecessarily hindering productivity. Furthermore, Conditional Access can be combined with risk-based signals from Azure AD Identity Protection, allowing policies to adapt dynamically to detected threats, such as suspicious login patterns or compromised credentials.

While Azure AD Conditional Access secures access based on identity and device health, other Azure security features operate at different layers and cannot enforce the same types of controls. Azure Firewall, for example, provides network-level protection by inspecting and filtering inbound and outbound traffic. It is highly effective at blocking malicious connections and managing traffic flows across networks, but it does not evaluate device compliance, enforce authentication policies, or distinguish between trusted and untrusted users. Similarly, Network Security Groups offer granular control over network traffic by specifying which IP addresses, ports, or protocols are allowed to communicate with Azure resources. While essential for network security, NSGs cannot verify user identity, assess device health, or require MFA, making them insufficient for controlling access to Azure Virtual Desktop based on compliance or risk.

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is another tool within Azure’s security ecosystem. RBAC determines which users can access specific resources and what actions they are permitted to perform. While RBAC ensures proper authorization and enforces the principle of least privilege, it does not evaluate conditions such as device compliance or enforce additional authentication steps. Consequently, RBAC alone cannot protect resources from access by non-compliant or risky devices.

Azure AD Conditional Access addresses these gaps by combining identity verification, device compliance checks, location awareness, and adaptive authentication into a single, centralized solution. By implementing Conditional Access, organizations can ensure that only authorized users on secure devices are able to access Azure Virtual Desktop. This not only reduces the risk of unauthorized access but also supports a seamless and secure user experience. Its ability to enforce tailored policies and respond dynamically to changing risk conditions makes it the most effective solution for protecting virtual desktop environments, ensuring both security and operational efficiency.

Question 100

You want to deploy session hosts for users requiring GPU acceleration for graphical applications such as CAD or AI simulations. Which VM series should you choose?

A) NV-series
B) B-series
C) D-series
D) A-series

Answer: A) NV-series

Explanation:

NV-series virtual machines are specifically designed to deliver high-performance graphics capabilities for workloads that require intensive visual computing. These virtual machines come equipped with dedicated NVIDIA GPUs, providing the computational power necessary for applications such as computer-aided design (CAD), 3D modeling, simulation, artificial intelligence, and other visualization tasks. By integrating GPUs directly into the VM, NV-series ensures that graphics-heavy applications run smoothly and responsively, even in multi-session environments like Azure Virtual Desktop. This makes them particularly suitable for professional users who depend on high-performance graphical processing to complete complex tasks efficiently and without delays.

The architecture of NV-series VMs is optimized to handle large-scale visual workloads. The inclusion of dedicated GPU resources enables the offloading of graphics processing from the CPU, which improves overall system performance and reduces bottlenecks. Users working on applications like Autodesk AutoCAD, SolidWorks, or Adobe Creative Cloud benefit from faster rendering times, smoother interactions, and a consistent experience across virtual desktops. Additionally, the NV-series supports multiple concurrent sessions, allowing organizations to scale GPU resources across teams without sacrificing performance. This capability is essential for enterprises that need to provide high-quality virtual desktop experiences for creative professionals, engineers, or researchers who rely on graphics-intensive tools.

In contrast, other VM series available in Azure are less suitable for high-performance graphical tasks. B-series virtual machines are general-purpose, burstable instances designed for workloads with variable CPU usage. While they offer cost efficiency and flexibility for applications that do not require consistent high performance, they lack GPU resources entirely. As a result, B-series VMs cannot provide the necessary acceleration for tasks like 3D modeling or rendering, making them unsuitable for graphics-intensive workloads.

Similarly, D-series virtual machines are designed to offer a balance between CPU and memory performance for general-purpose workloads. They provide sufficient resources for typical business applications, databases, and development environments, but do not include dedicated GPUs. This limitation prevents D-series VMs from delivering the required performance for applications that rely heavily on graphical processing or parallel computations. Users running CAD software or visualization tools on D-series instances may experience slow rendering, lag, or suboptimal performance.

A-series virtual machines represent legacy general-purpose VMs within Azure. While they can handle basic workloads and provide an entry-level solution for virtualized environments, they are not optimized for GPU acceleration. Applications requiring high-performance graphics will encounter reduced responsiveness and slower processing times on A-series VMs, making them unsuitable for professional creative or engineering workloads.

Overall, NV-series virtual machines stand out as the most appropriate choice for graphics-intensive workloads in Azure Virtual Desktop. By providing dedicated NVIDIA GPUs, NV-series ensures smooth, responsive performance for professional applications, supports multiple concurrent sessions, and eliminates bottlenecks associated with CPU-bound rendering. Unlike B-series, D-series, or A-series VMs, NV-series is purpose-built for high-performance visual computing, making it the ideal solution for organizations that need reliable GPU acceleration for CAD, 3D modeling, AI simulations, and other demanding graphical tasks. Its combination of dedicated GPU resources, multi-session support, and optimized architecture ensures that users experience professional-grade performance in a virtual desktop environment, enabling productivity and efficiency for graphics-focused workloads.

Question 101

You want to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts that automatically scale up during peak usage hours and scale down during off-peak hours to optimize both performance and cost. Which feature should you implement?

A) Autoscale for host pools
B) Azure Monitor Alerts
C) Azure Advisor
D) Azure Policy

Answer: A) Autoscale for host pools

Explanation:

Autoscale for host pools is a feature designed to automatically adjust the number of session hosts in a host pool based on user demand, schedules, or performance metrics. By defining rules that trigger scaling actions, you can ensure that additional session hosts are provisioned during periods of high activity, guaranteeing sufficient capacity for users, while idle hosts are deallocated during periods of low activity, reducing costs. Autoscale rules can be configured using metrics such as the number of active user sessions, CPU or memory utilization, or time-based schedules. It integrates with Azure Monitor to track metrics and send notifications when scaling actions occur, giving administrators visibility into system performance and usage patterns.

Azure Monitor Alerts notify administrators when performance thresholds are crossed, but they do not automatically provision or deallocate session hosts. They are reactive and require manual intervention to adjust host count.

Azure Advisor provides recommendations for optimizing resources, cost, and security, but it does not perform real-time scaling of resources. It offers guidance rather than operational automation.

Azure Policy enforces compliance and governance rules on Azure resources, ensuring they meet organizational standards. However, it does not adjust resources dynamically based on load or usage metrics.

Autoscale for host pools is the correct solution because it enables automated, cost-efficient scaling of session hosts while ensuring performance levels remain adequate during peak and off-peak periods. It reduces administrative effort and supports an elastic infrastructure model.

Question 102

You need to ensure that user profiles are consistent across multiple session hosts in a pooled host pool while minimizing logon times. Which solution should you implement?

A) FSLogix Profile Containers
B) Roaming Profiles
C) OneDrive for Business
D) Azure Files

Answer: A) FSLogix Profile Containers

Explanation:

FSLogix Profile Containers provide a method of storing user profiles in virtual disks (VHD or VHDX) that are dynamically attached to session hosts at login. This ensures that users have consistent settings, application configurations, and personal data regardless of the session host they connect to. By mounting the profile container rather than copying files at login and logout, logon times are greatly reduced compared to traditional roaming profiles. FSLogix is optimized for multi-session environments, reducing profile corruption and providing seamless integration with Office 365 applications such as Outlook, Teams, and OneDrive. Users experience a consistent environment with faster logins and reliable access to all necessary applications and data.

Roaming Profiles copies profile data between session hosts, which can be slow and prone to errors, particularly for large profiles. They are not optimized for cloud-based or multi-session Azure Virtual Desktop deployments.

OneDrive for Business only synchronizes user files, not full Windows profiles. Desktop settings and application configurations may vary, leading to inconsistent experiences across hosts.

Azure Files can host profiles on a network share, but reading large profiles from a network share increases logon times and lacks the dynamic attachment mechanism provided by FSLogix.

FSLogix Profile Containers is the correct solution because it ensures fast, reliable, and consistent user profile access across multiple session hosts while optimizing login performance.

Question 103

You want to restrict Azure Virtual Desktop access to only compliant devices and require multi-factor authentication when necessary. Which feature should you configure?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Azure Firewall
C) Network Security Groups
D) Role-Based Access Control

Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access allows administrators to enforce policies based on device compliance, user risk, location, and authentication strength. By using Conditional Access, you can ensure that only devices meeting security policies are allowed to connect to Azure Virtual Desktop and enforce multi-factor authentication for users accessing from non-compliant devices or risky conditions. This provides a strong layer of security while maintaining flexibility, ensuring organizational resources are protected. Policies can be targeted to specific users, groups, or locations, enabling granular control over access.

Azure Firewall provides network-level filtering and traffic inspection, but cannot evaluate device compliance or enforce multi-factor authentication policies.

Network Security Groups manage inbound and outbound traffic rules, but cannot assess user identity, device compliance, or authentication strength.

Role-Based Access Control defines which users have permissions on resources, but does not enforce security requirements for the device or authentication conditions.

Azure AD Conditional Access is the correct solution because it enforces identity- and device-based access control, securing Azure Virtual Desktop access while allowing policy-based flexibility.

Question 104

You need to deploy session hosts that support GPU-intensive workloads for applications such as CAD, 3D modeling, or AI simulations. Which VM series should you select?

A) NV-series
B) B-series
C) D-series
D) A-series

Answer: A) NV-series

Explanation:

NV-series virtual machines are designed for high-performance GPU workloads. They provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs, making them suitable for graphics-intensive applications like CAD, 3D modeling, AI simulations, and other visualization tasks. NV-series VMs are optimized for multi-session environments in Azure Virtual Desktop, ensuring that GPU-intensive applications run smoothly and that multiple users can share resources without compromising performance. Using NV-series VMs provides responsive and high-performance experiences for professional users who rely on GPU acceleration.

B-series VMs are general-purpose, burstable machines intended for light workloads and do not provide GPUs, making them unsuitable for graphics-intensive tasks.

D-series VMs provide balanced CPU and memory performance but lack GPU capabilities, limiting their suitability for high-performance graphical workloads.

A-series VMs are older, legacy machines not optimized for modern GPU workloads, and provide lower performance for graphics-intensive applications.

NV-series is the correct choice because it delivers dedicated GPU resources necessary for high-performance graphical and compute-intensive workloads in Azure Virtual Desktop.

Question 105

You want to provide task workers access to only specific applications without granting them full desktop access in Azure Virtual Desktop. Which deployment method should you implement?

A) RemoteApp programs
B) Personal host pool
C) Pooled host pool
D) ARM template

Answer: A) RemoteApp programs

Explanation:

RemoteApp programs offer a highly efficient and secure approach to application delivery within Azure Virtual Desktop environments by allowing administrators to publish individual applications rather than providing access to a full desktop environment. This method enables organizations to restrict users to only the applications they need, minimizing unnecessary access to system resources and reducing potential security risks. By limiting access to essential applications, RemoteApp programs help safeguard sensitive data and lower the risk of accidental or unauthorized changes to system settings. Additionally, this targeted access approach optimizes resource utilization, as virtual desktops do not need to allocate CPU, memory, or storage for unused applications or features, resulting in more efficient infrastructure use and potentially lower operational costs.

One of the primary advantages of RemoteApp programs is their flexibility in access and device compatibility. Users can connect to published applications through the Remote Desktop client on Windows devices or through the HTML5 web client, which enables browser-based access from virtually any device, including macOS, iOS, Android, or even public computers. This clientless access ensures that employees can work from virtually anywhere without needing to install additional software, making it an ideal solution for remote or mobile workers. Furthermore, because RemoteApp programs are published independently of the session host, users experience consistent application performance and functionality regardless of which host they connect to, supporting a seamless user experience in multi-session environments.

RemoteApp programs are especially well-suited for task workers, who typically only require access to a limited set of applications rather than a complete desktop environment. Personal host pools, which provide dedicated desktops with persistent settings and full access to all installed applications, are often unnecessary for such users. Deploying full desktops in these cases leads to higher infrastructure costs and increased administrative overhead, as each desktop must be managed, updated, and maintained individually. Task workers do not benefit from this level of access, making personal desktops inefficient for their use cases.

Pooled host pools offer a more cost-efficient alternative by allowing multiple users to share session hosts. However, by default, pooled host pools provide full desktops to users, which may still exceed the requirements for task-oriented workflows. While it is possible to combine pooled host pools with RemoteApp programs to restrict access to specific applications, relying solely on full desktop access in a pooled environment is often inefficient, as it consumes unnecessary resources and exposes users to applications they do not need.

While ARM templates provide powerful automation for deploying session hosts, host pools, and other Azure resources, they do not control application access for end users. ARM templates are designed to streamline deployment processes, but they cannot restrict or customize which applications a user can access within a host pool. As such, they complement infrastructure provisioning but do not replace the functionality provided by RemoteApp programs.

RemoteApp programs are the most appropriate solution for organizations seeking to deliver application-level access in Azure Virtual Desktop. By publishing only the applications necessary for specific roles, administrators can enhance security, improve resource efficiency, and provide a consistent, flexible user experience across multiple devices. This approach ensures that task workers have access to the tools they need without exposing full desktops, creating a more manageable, cost-effective, and secure virtual desktop environment.