Isaca CISA Certified Information Systems Auditor Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q106-120
Visit here for our full Isaca CISA exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 106
Which control is most effective for ensuring that security patches are applied to critical systems promptly?
A) Implementing a patch management program with inventory, prioritization, testing, deployment, and verification processes
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing a patch management program with inventory, prioritization, testing, deployment, and verification processes is the most effective control for ensuring that security patches are applied to critical systems promptly. Security patches are updates provided by software vendors to fix vulnerabilities, improve functionality, and enhance system stability. Failure to apply patches promptly exposes systems to exploitation by attackers, which can result in data breaches, system compromises, and operational disruptions. A patch management program begins with maintaining an up-to-date inventory of hardware and software assets, ensuring visibility into all systems requiring updates. Prioritization is essential, focusing first on critical systems, high-risk vulnerabilities, and compliance-related patches, enabling resources to be allocated effectively. Testing patches in controlled environments ensures compatibility, prevents unintended system outages, and mitigates the risk of introducing new issues. Deployment involves applying patches consistently across all affected systems using automated tools or controlled procedures to reduce errors and gaps. Verification confirms that patches have been successfully installed and that vulnerabilities have been mitigated, providing evidence for auditors and supporting regulatory compliance. This program offers preventive assurance by reducing the window of exposure to known vulnerabilities and detective assurance by validating that patches are applied correctly and completely. Auditors can review inventory records, patch schedules, testing documentation, deployment logs, and verification reports to ensure that patch management aligns with organizational policies and regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, NIST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. Effective patch management reduces the risk of system compromise, maintains operational continuity, and ensures that systems are resilient against emerging threats. Continuous monitoring, periodic audits, and updates to patching procedures ensure ongoing effectiveness as new vulnerabilities, systems, and applications emerge. Integration with vulnerability scanning and threat intelligence enables prioritization of patches based on actual risk exposure, optimizing security management. Proper documentation of patch management processes and verification results provides accountability and supports evidence for internal and external audits. By implementing a structured and comprehensive patch management program, organizations ensure that critical systems remain secure, compliant, and operationally stable.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not ensure that patches are applied or that systems remain protected from known vulnerabilities. While useful for network performance, it does not provide preventive or detective assurance for patch management.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to operational security but does not address unpatched software vulnerabilities, nor does it provide oversight of patch deployment or verification processes. Endpoint protection complements patch management but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about patching policies, security risks, and safe computing practices. Awareness improves compliance and reduces human error, but does not technically enforce patch application, prioritize updates, or verify remediation. Training alone is insufficient to maintain system security against unpatched vulnerabilities.
By implementing a patch management program with inventory, prioritization, testing, deployment, and verification, organizations maintain timely protection against vulnerabilities, reduce operational and security risks, and ensure compliance with internal and regulatory standards. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved by proactively applying patches and validating their successful implementation. Continuous evaluation, monitoring, and improvement ensure effectiveness in dynamic IT environments, where threats and software updates are constantly evolving. Auditors can validate patch schedules, testing protocols, and verification logs to ensure systems are maintained in a secure and compliant state. Implementing a comprehensive patch management program is the most effective control for ensuring that security patches are applied promptly. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support security objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured patch management provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces vulnerabilities, and maintains operational and regulatory compliance.
Question 107
Which audit procedure is most effective for verifying that third-party service providers comply with contractual security requirements?
A) Reviewing contracts, service level agreements, third-party audits, and monitoring reports
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Reviewing contracts, service level agreements, third-party audits, and monitoring reports is the most effective audit procedure for verifying that third-party service providers comply with contractual security requirements. Organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors for cloud services, data processing, managed IT services, and other critical functions. These relationships introduce risks related to data confidentiality, integrity, availability, and regulatory compliance. Contracts and service level agreements define security obligations, performance metrics, reporting requirements, and accountability measures. By reviewing these agreements, auditors ensure that security responsibilities are clearly specified, measurable, and enforceable. Third-party audits, such as SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001 certifications, and penetration testing reports, provide independent verification that the service provider implements security controls in accordance with contractual obligations and industry standards. Monitoring reports, which may include access logs, incident reports, compliance dashboards, and performance metrics, provide ongoing evidence of adherence to security and operational requirements. This integrated approach provides preventive assurance by ensuring contractual obligations address risk areas and detective assurance by verifying compliance through independent reports and monitoring data. Auditors can examine contracts, audit reports, monitoring outputs, and communication records to confirm that third parties maintain appropriate security controls, manage risks effectively, and comply with organizational policies and regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001. Effective third-party oversight reduces the risk of data breaches, service disruptions, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Continuous monitoring, periodic audits, and review of performance metrics enable organizations to respond promptly to noncompliance, adjust contracts, and enforce corrective actions. Integration of third-party management with enterprise risk management frameworks ensures that vendor risks are evaluated, mitigated, and documented systematically. Proper documentation of reviews, audits, and corrective actions provides evidence for internal and external audits and supports accountability and governance. By implementing a structured approach to reviewing contracts, audits, and monitoring reports, organizations maintain confidence in the security and reliability of third-party service providers. This approach strengthens risk management, enhances compliance, and ensures continuity of operations.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not verify contractual compliance, security controls, or operational performance of third-party providers. It cannot substitute for formal review, audit, or monitoring procedures.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects devices from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to operational security but does not verify that third-party providers adhere to contractual security requirements or regulatory standards. Endpoint protection complements third-party oversight but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about third-party risk management, policies, and responsibilities. Awareness supports proper behavior but does not technically verify compliance, review audit reports, or monitor third-party performance. Training alone is insufficient for ensuring contractual compliance.
By reviewing contracts, service level agreements, third-party audits, and monitoring reports, auditors can verify that third-party providers comply with security obligations, maintain operational reliability, and manage risks effectively. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved by defining obligations and independently verifying adherence. Continuous evaluation, monitoring, and periodic audits ensure ongoing compliance and mitigate vendor-related risks. Proper documentation enhances accountability, supports internal and external audits, and strengthens enterprise risk management.
Reviewing contracts, service level agreements, third-party audits, and monitoring reports is the most effective audit procedure for verifying third-party compliance with security requirements. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured third-party oversight ensures preventive and detective assurance, reduces operational and security risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.
Question 108
Which control is most effective for ensuring that data transmitted over public networks is protected against interception and tampering?
A) Implementing encryption protocols, secure communication channels, and key management procedures
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing encryption protocols, secure communication channels, and key management procedures is the most effective control for ensuring that data transmitted over public networks is protected against interception and tampering. Data transmitted over public networks, such as the internet, is vulnerable to eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle attacks, packet sniffing, and unauthorized modification. Encryption protocols, such as TLS, SSL, IPSec, and SSH, provide confidentiality, ensuring that transmitted data is unreadable to unauthorized parties. Integrity mechanisms, such as message authentication codes and digital signatures, verify that the data has not been altered during transmission. Secure communication channels, including virtual private networks (VPNs) and secure application gateways, create protected tunnels that prevent interception and reduce exposure to external threats. Key management procedures establish secure generation, distribution, rotation, storage, and revocation of cryptographic keys, ensuring that only authorized parties can encrypt or decrypt data. This integrated control provides preventive assurance by protecting data during transmission and detective assurance by enabling monitoring and verification of encryption use and key management compliance. Auditors can review encryption configurations, protocols in use, key management logs, and network traffic monitoring to confirm adherence to organizational security policies and regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and NIST. Effective encryption and secure communication practices reduce the risk of data breaches, unauthorized access, and reputational damage. Continuous evaluation, updates, and testing ensure that encryption algorithms remain robust, secure against evolving cryptographic attacks, and compatible with modern systems. Proper key management enhances accountability, prevents unauthorized key use, and ensures recoverability in case of key compromise. By implementing encryption protocols, secure communication channels, and key management, organizations ensure that sensitive information remains confidential, accurate, and secure while in transit. This approach also facilitates regulatory compliance, risk mitigation, and incident response readiness. Auditors can validate that encryption is consistently applied, that weak or deprecated protocols are avoided, and that monitoring and logging provide evidence of effective control.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While network metrics may reveal anomalies, bandwidth monitoring does not encrypt or secure transmitted data, nor does it ensure integrity. It cannot replace encryption protocols or secure channels.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects devices from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus helps maintain endpoint security, but does not secure data in transit or prevent interception over public networks. It complements encryption but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about secure transmission practices and data protection policies. Awareness reduces risky behavior but does not technically enforce encryption, secure channels, or key management. Training alone cannot prevent interception or tampering.
By implementing encryption protocols, secure communication channels, and key management procedures, organizations protect data during transmission, maintain confidentiality and integrity, reduce exposure to interception, and support compliance requirements. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through encryption enforcement, secure channels, and key monitoring. Continuous evaluation and improvement maintain the effectiveness of transmission security against evolving threats. Implementing encryption protocols, secure communication channels, and key management procedures is the most effective control for protecting data over public networks. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives, but do not ensure secure transmission. Integrated encryption and key management provide preventive and detective assurance, protect sensitive information, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 109
Which control is most effective for ensuring that user accounts are deactivated promptly when employees leave the organization?
A) Implementing an automated user account lifecycle management system with provisioning, deactivation, and periodic review
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing an automated user account lifecycle management system with provisioning, deactivation, and periodic review is the most effective control for ensuring that user accounts are deactivated promptly when employees leave the organization. User accounts provide access to critical systems, data, and applications. If accounts are not deactivated promptly, former employees or contractors may retain access, creating the risk of unauthorized activity, data breaches, and regulatory noncompliance. An automated user account lifecycle management system integrates with human resources systems to synchronize account creation, modification, and deactivation processes based on employment status changes. Provisioning ensures that accounts are created with appropriate permissions aligned with job responsibilities, following the principle of least privilege. Deactivation occurs automatically when employees leave, are transferred, or change roles, reducing the risk of orphaned accounts and potential misuse. Periodic reviews validate that existing accounts remain appropriate, active accounts are used correctly, and unnecessary or inactive accounts are removed. This approach provides preventive assurance by preventing unauthorized access through timely account management and detective assurance by maintaining logs and records of user account activity, changes, and deactivation events. Auditors can review account lifecycle management policies, automation workflows, deactivation logs, and periodic review reports to ensure compliance with organizational policies and regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Effective account lifecycle management reduces the risk of insider threats, unauthorized access, operational disruptions, and reputational damage. Continuous monitoring and periodic audits ensure that automation rules remain effective, address exceptions, and reflect organizational changes. Integration with authentication mechanisms, access control policies, and activity monitoring enhances security and provides comprehensive oversight of user accounts. By implementing an automated lifecycle management system, organizations ensure the timely deactivation of accounts, maintain accountability, and strengthen their overall security posture. Proper documentation of account provisioning, modification, and deactivation supports regulatory compliance and internal audit processes, providing traceability and evidence for review. Continuous improvement of account management practices ensures alignment with evolving business needs, security requirements, and emerging threats. This control ensures that all user accounts, especially those with elevated privileges, are managed efficiently, reducing the risk of exploitation, data compromise, or unauthorized access by former employees.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While useful for detecting anomalies, bandwidth monitoring does not deactivate accounts or prevent unauthorized access for former employees. It does not provide preventive or detective assurance regarding account lifecycle management.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus enhances endpoint security but cannot enforce the timely deactivation of user accounts or ensure access is revoked. Endpoint protection complements account management but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about account management policies, login responsibilities, and security procedures. Awareness reduces human errors but does not technically enforce automated account deactivation or maintain audit logs. Training alone is insufficient to mitigate risks from inactive accounts.
By implementing an automated user account lifecycle management system with provisioning, deactivation, and periodic review, organizations maintain control over access, reduce operational and security risks, and ensure regulatory compliance. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through automation, monitoring, and reporting. Continuous evaluation ensures the system remains effective as personnel changes, technologies evolve, and organizational requirements shift. Auditors can validate logs, automation workflows, and review records to confirm timely deactivation and adherence to policies.
Implementing an automated user account lifecycle management system is the most effective control for ensuring the timely deactivation of user accounts. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support security objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Lifecycle management provides preventive and detective assurance, maintains accountability, reduces risk, and ensures operational and regulatory compliance.
Question 110
Which audit procedure is most effective for verifying that sensitive data stored in cloud environments is protected?
A) Reviewing encryption implementation, access controls, monitoring reports, and cloud provider certifications
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Reviewing encryption implementation, access controls, monitoring reports, and cloud provider certifications is the most effective audit procedure for verifying that sensitive data stored in cloud environments is protected. Cloud environments, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, host critical data and applications. Protection of this data is essential to prevent unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or deletion. Encryption implementation ensures that data is rendered unreadable to unauthorized parties both at rest and in transit, using strong cryptographic protocols such as AES-256 or TLS. Access controls enforce role-based permissions, multi-factor authentication, and least privilege principles, restricting data access to authorized users only. Monitoring reports provide evidence of user activity, access attempts, anomaly detection, and policy enforcement, enabling timely detection of potential security incidents. Cloud provider certifications, such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, or CSA STAR, provide independent validation that the provider adheres to industry-recognized security standards and implements controls effectively. This integrated approach provides preventive assurance by enforcing encryption, access controls, and provider security standards, and detective assurance by enabling monitoring and verification of compliance and activity. Auditors can examine encryption configurations, access control policies, monitoring logs, and certification documentation to ensure that cloud data protection aligns with organizational policies, risk appetite, and regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001. Effective cloud security oversight reduces the risk of unauthorized access, data leakage, breaches, and compliance violations. Continuous monitoring, periodic audits, and verification of encryption, access controls, and provider compliance maintain ongoing security and risk management. Integration of data classification, retention policies, and security monitoring ensures comprehensive protection for sensitive information. Proper documentation of procedures, reports, and certifications provides evidence for auditors, supports accountability, and demonstrates adherence to regulatory requirements. By verifying encryption, access controls, monitoring, and cloud provider security, organizations ensure that sensitive data remains confidential, accurate, and resilient against potential threats. Auditors can confirm that controls are implemented consistently across cloud environments, policies are enforced, and incidents are detected promptly. This approach strengthens organizational security posture, supports regulatory compliance, and mitigates risks associated with third-party cloud services. Continuous improvement ensures that security practices remain effective as cloud technologies evolve, data volumes grow, and threat landscapes change.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While network monitoring can detect anomalies or performance issues, it does not confirm encryption, access control enforcement, or protection of data stored in cloud environments. Bandwidth monitoring cannot ensure preventive or detective assurance for cloud data security.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects devices from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Endpoint protection enhances overall security but does not secure data at rest or in transit in cloud environments, nor does it provide visibility into cloud provider practices or encryption enforcement. Antivirus complements cloud security but cannot replace proper controls.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about cloud security policies, safe handling of sensitive data, and compliance obligations. Awareness reduces human errors but does not technically enforce encryption, access control, or monitoring. Training alone cannot guarantee cloud data protection.
By reviewing encryption implementation, access controls, monitoring reports, and cloud provider certifications, auditors can ensure that sensitive data in the cloud is protected, risks are mitigated, and regulatory requirements are met. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through encryption enforcement, access restrictions, monitoring, and certification validation. Continuous evaluation maintains effectiveness against evolving threats and cloud technologies.
Reviewing encryption, access controls, monitoring reports, and cloud provider certifications is the most effective audit procedure for verifying the protection of sensitive data in cloud environments. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support security objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Integrated cloud controls provide preventive and detective assurance, mitigate risk, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 111
Which control is most effective for ensuring that audit trails are tamper-proof and available when needed for investigation?
A) Implementing centralized logging with secure storage, access controls, and regular backup and monitoring
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing centralized logging with secure storage, access controls, and regular backup and monitoring is the most effective control for ensuring that audit trails are tamper-proof and available when needed for investigation. Audit trails are critical for tracking user activities, system events, and changes in applications and databases. Ensuring the integrity, availability, and protection of logs is essential for security monitoring, forensic investigations, compliance audits, and regulatory reporting. Centralized logging consolidates logs from multiple systems, applications, and network devices into a single repository, simplifying management, correlation, and analysis. Secure storage ensures that logs are protected from unauthorized access, modification, or deletion, maintaining integrity and trustworthiness. Access controls restrict who can view, modify, or delete logs, preventing tampering and ensuring accountability. Regular backups of log data ensure availability in case of system failure, accidental deletion, or malicious activity. Monitoring verifies that logging processes are functioning correctly, captures anomalies in real time, and alerts security personnel to potential tampering or operational issues. This integrated control provides preventive assurance by safeguarding logs and controlling access, and detective assurance by detecting anomalies, unauthorized changes, or missing entries. Auditors can review logging configurations, access permissions, monitoring alerts, and backup records to confirm that audit trails are complete, accurate, protected, and retained according to organizational policies and regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, SOX, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. Effective log management enables organizations to detect security incidents, conduct root cause analysis, track user behavior, and support investigations or legal proceedings. Continuous monitoring, periodic audits, and verification of logging processes ensure the ongoing reliability and integrity of audit trails. Integration with incident response, security information and event management (SIEM), and data retention policies enhances the ability to detect, investigate, and report security events. Proper documentation of configurations, access logs, alerts, and backups provides evidence for auditors and supports accountability and compliance. By implementing centralized logging with secure storage, access controls, backup, and monitoring, organizations maintain tamper-proof audit trails, ensure investigative readiness, and enhance overall security posture. This control reduces the risk of undetected unauthorized activity, ensures compliance with regulations, and supports operational transparency and accountability.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring may detect anomalies, but does not ensure log integrity, secure storage, access control, or availability of audit trails. It cannot replace centralized logging.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus helps maintain endpoint security, but does not prevent tampering of audit trails or ensure availability for investigations. Endpoint protection complements logging but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about proper logging procedures, security policies, and responsibilities. Awareness reduces errors and mismanagement but does not technically enforce tamper-proof logs, backups, or monitoring. Training alone cannot ensure investigative readiness.
By implementing centralized logging with secure storage, access controls, and regular backup and monitoring, organizations can maintain reliable, tamper-proof audit trails, detect incidents promptly, and meet regulatory requirements. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through secure storage, controlled access, backups, and continuous monitoring. This control ensures accountability, operational oversight, and readiness for forensic investigations. Continuous evaluation and improvement maintain the effectiveness of logging practices as systems, applications, and threats evolve. Implementing centralized logging with secure storage, access controls, and regular backup and monitoring is the most effective control for ensuring tamper-proof audit trails. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Integrated logging practices provide preventive and detective assurance, protect data integrity, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 112
Which control is most effective for ensuring that critical business processes continue during a disaster or major system outage?
A) Implementing a comprehensive business continuity and disaster recovery (BC/DR) program with regular testing and review
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing a comprehensive business continuity and disaster recovery program with regular testing and review is the most effective control for ensuring that critical business processes continue during a disaster or major system outage. Critical business processes are essential for the organization’s operational, financial, and reputational stability. A BC/DR program involves identifying critical processes, assessing risks, and developing strategies to maintain or restore operations following disruptive events. This includes creating disaster recovery plans for IT systems, backup strategies for data, alternate processing sites, communication plans, and escalation procedures. Regular testing of the program through drills, simulations, and tabletop exercises ensures that plans are effective, staff are trained, and gaps are identified and corrected. Periodic review keeps the program up to date with changes in business operations, technology, personnel, and regulatory requirements. This integrated approach provides preventive assurance by preparing the organization to continue operations despite disruptions and detective assurance by validating the effectiveness of recovery plans and identifying potential weaknesses. Auditors can examine BC/DR policies, recovery plans, test results, incident logs, and post-test reviews to confirm that the program is effective and aligned with organizational and regulatory requirements such as ISO 22301, ISO 27001, SOX, and HIPAA. Effective BC/DR management minimizes financial loss, operational downtime, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Continuous monitoring, testing, and refinement ensure that recovery procedures are robust, responsive, and capable of handling various disaster scenarios. Integration with risk management, IT service management, and security incident response ensures comprehensive coverage and alignment with organizational objectives. Documentation of testing, training, and review processes provides evidence for auditors, management, and regulators that the organization is prepared for business interruptions. By implementing a BC/DR program, organizations maintain operational resilience, enhance stakeholder confidence, and reduce the risk of prolonged outages. Proper planning ensures that resources, personnel, and technology are coordinated to restore critical operations efficiently. The program also supports compliance with legal and regulatory obligations, demonstrating due diligence in protecting stakeholders and sensitive information. This preventive and detective control ensures that processes critical to the organization’s mission continue or are quickly restored following a disruption. Regular evaluation and continuous improvement make the BC/DR program adaptive to evolving threats, technological changes, and business priorities. Organizations that implement effective BC/DR controls can respond to incidents with minimal impact, maintain service levels, and safeguard business continuity.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not ensure the continuation of business processes during disasters or outages and cannot provide preventive or detective assurance for recovery preparedness.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to operational security but does not guarantee continuity of critical business processes or recovery capabilities during system outages. Endpoint protection complements BC/DR but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about disaster preparedness, incident response procedures, and BC/DR responsibilities. Awareness reduces human errors but does not technically enforce or test recovery capabilities. Training alone cannot ensure that critical processes continue during disruptions.
By implementing a BC/DR program with comprehensive planning, testing, and review, organizations ensure operational resilience, minimize risks, and provide evidence of preparedness for auditors and regulators. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through preparation, testing, and validation of recovery strategies. Continuous monitoring and refinement maintain effectiveness in dynamic business environments, supporting regulatory compliance and risk mitigation.
Implementing a comprehensive BC/DR program with regular testing and review is the most effective control for ensuring the continuation of critical business processes during a disaster. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured BC/DR programs provide preventive and detective assurance, reduce operational risks, and maintain business continuity and compliance.
Question 113
Which audit procedure is most effective for verifying that sensitive data is classified correctly according to organizational policy?
A) Reviewing data classification policies, sample data sets, access controls, and documentation of classification decisions
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Reviewing data classification policies, sample data sets, access controls, and documentation of classification decisions is the most effective audit procedure for verifying that sensitive data is classified correctly according to organizational policy. Data classification ensures that information is identified and handled according to its sensitivity, value, and regulatory requirements. Proper classification enables appropriate access controls, encryption, retention, and disposal measures, reducing the risk of unauthorized disclosure, misuse, or regulatory violations. Data classification policies define classification categories, criteria, handling requirements, and responsibilities, providing a framework for consistent application across the organization. Reviewing sample data sets allows auditors to validate that classification labels align with policy definitions and that data handling practices reflect sensitivity levels. Access controls, such as role-based permissions, encryption, and usage restrictions, indicate whether classified data is protected according to its assigned category. Documentation of classification decisions provides evidence that the organization follows defined processes, records rationales for decisions, and maintains accountability. This approach provides preventive assurance by ensuring that sensitive data is handled appropriately from creation to disposal and detective assurance by enabling verification of correct classification through sampling and access review. Auditors can examine classification policies, sample data, access permissions, and documentation to confirm compliance with organizational standards and regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001. Effective data classification reduces the risk of breaches, unauthorized disclosure, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. Periodic reviews ensure that classifications remain relevant as business needs, regulatory requirements, and threat landscapes evolve. Integration with retention, backup, and disposal policies ensures that sensitive data is managed throughout its lifecycle. Proper classification also supports audit readiness, incident investigation, and secure sharing of information internally and externally. Continuous evaluation and improvement of classification processes strengthen data governance, maintain compliance, and reduce operational and security risks. By verifying policies, sample data, access controls, and documentation, auditors ensure that sensitive data is appropriately identified, protected, and accountable. Structured classification provides consistent handling, enhances security, and ensures that data protection measures align with organizational priorities and regulatory obligations.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not verify that sensitive data is classified correctly or handled according to organizational policies. It cannot substitute for data classification review procedures.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to operational security but does not verify proper classification or handling of sensitive data. Endpoint protection complements classification but cannot replace structured verification.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about data classification policies and handling requirements. Awareness supports proper behavior but does not technically verify classification, access controls, or documentation of decisions. Training alone cannot ensure data protection compliance.
By reviewing data classification policies, sample data, access controls, and documentation, auditors can confirm that sensitive data is appropriately classified, handled securely, and aligned with regulatory requirements. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved by proper classification and verification. Continuous evaluation ensures that classification remains effective as organizational needs and regulatory landscapes evolve. Proper documentation enhances accountability, supports audit readiness, and strengthens data governance.
Reviewing data classification policies, sample data sets, access controls, and documentation of classification decisions is the most effective audit procedure for verifying the correct classification of sensitive data. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured classification processes provide preventive and detective assurance, reduce risks, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 114
Which control is most effective for ensuring that system configurations are consistent, secure, and aligned with organizational standards?
A) Implementing configuration management tools, baselines, change control processes, and periodic audits
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing configuration management tools, baselines, change control processes, and periodic audits is the most effective control for ensuring that system configurations are consistent, secure, and aligned with organizational standards. System configuration refers to the settings, parameters, and software versions applied to hardware, operating systems, applications, and network devices. Misconfigurations can introduce vulnerabilities, reduce performance, and result in noncompliance with policies or regulatory requirements. Configuration management tools automate the process of maintaining system settings, tracking changes, and ensuring consistency across multiple systems. Baselines establish approved and tested configurations, providing a reference point for comparison and enforcement. Change control processes ensure that any modifications to system configurations are authorized, tested, documented, and reviewed before implementation, reducing the risk of unintended errors or security gaps. Periodic audits validate that systems adhere to established baselines, identify deviations, and recommend corrective actions, providing preventive and detective assurance. Auditors can review baseline documentation, configuration management tool outputs, change logs, and audit reports to confirm that systems are configured securely, consistently, and in compliance with organizational policies and regulatory standards such as ISO 27001, NIST, PCI DSS, and SOX. Effective configuration management reduces the risk of security breaches, operational failures, and noncompliance. Continuous monitoring ensures the timely detection of unauthorized changes or deviations from approved baselines. Integration with patch management, vulnerability management, and incident response processes strengthens the overall security posture. Proper documentation of baselines, changes, and audits supports accountability, evidence for regulatory compliance, and operational oversight. By implementing configuration management tools, baselines, change controls, and periodic audits, organizations maintain secure and consistent system configurations, mitigate risk, and ensure alignment with organizational objectives. Regular review and continuous improvement ensure the effectiveness of configuration management practices as systems, software, and technologies evolve. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through automated enforcement, structured change control, and periodic verification, reducing vulnerabilities and operational risks.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not ensure secure or consistent system configurations and cannot prevent unauthorized changes or deviations from baselines.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus enhances endpoint security but does not manage system configurations, enforce baselines, or verify compliance with organizational standards. Endpoint protection complements configuration management but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about proper configuration procedures and policy compliance. Awareness reduces human error but does not technically enforce, monitor, or audit system configurations. Training alone cannot maintain secure and consistent configurations.
By implementing configuration management tools, baselines, change control processes, and periodic audits, organizations ensure system configurations are consistent, secure, and compliant. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through automation, formal processes, and verification. Continuous evaluation maintains effectiveness, reduces vulnerabilities, and strengthens organizational security posture.
Implementing configuration management tools, baselines, change control processes, and periodic audits is the most effective control for ensuring consistent, secure, and policy-aligned system configurations. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured configuration management provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces operational risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.
Question 115
Which control is most effective for ensuring that database access is restricted based on the principle of least privilege?
A) Implementing role-based access controls (RBAC), segregation of duties, access reviews, and monitoring of database activity
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing role-based access controls, segregation of duties, access reviews, and monitoring of database activity is the most effective control for ensuring that database access is restricted based on the principle of least privilege. Databases often store sensitive organizational information, including financial data, personal records, intellectual property, and operational data. Unauthorized or excessive access can result in data breaches, manipulation, or accidental deletion. Role-based access controls assign permissions based on job responsibilities rather than individual preferences, ensuring that users have only the minimum level of access necessary to perform their duties. This approach enforces the principle of least privilege, limiting the potential impact of both human error and malicious activity. Segregation of duties separates critical database functions, preventing a single individual from having conflicting responsibilities that could result in fraud or misuse. Periodic access reviews evaluate user permissions to verify that access levels remain appropriate, identify orphaned accounts, and ensure that changes in roles or employment status are reflected in database permissions. Monitoring database activity provides visibility into queries, modifications, logins, and other operations, enabling the detection of unusual behavior, potential misuse, or policy violations. Auditors can review access policies, role definitions, access logs, monitoring reports, and review records to confirm that database access is implemented securely, aligns with organizational standards, and meets regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOX, and HIPAA. Effective implementation of these controls reduces the risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, operational errors, and regulatory noncompliance. Continuous monitoring, periodic reviews, and integration with identity management systems ensure ongoing enforcement of access controls and alignment with organizational policy. Proper documentation of access assignments, reviews, and monitoring provides evidence for auditors, supports accountability, and enhances governance. By combining role-based access controls, segregation of duties, access reviews, and monitoring, organizations maintain secure and compliant database environments. Preventive assurance is provided through structured access enforcement and segregation, while detective assurance is achieved through monitoring and review. These measures collectively reduce the risk of exposure, misuse, or compromise of sensitive data while supporting compliance, operational continuity, and governance objectives.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While bandwidth monitoring may identify unusual network activity, it does not enforce access controls, segregation of duties, or the principle of least privilege within databases. It cannot provide preventive or detective assurance for database security.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to overall security but does not manage database permissions, enforce segregation of duties, or monitor database activity. Endpoint protection complements database access controls but cannot replace them.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about proper access practices, organizational policies, and the importance of least privilege. Awareness reduces the likelihood of misuse or errors but does not technically enforce access restrictions, review permissions, or monitor activity. Training alone is insufficient to maintain secure database access.
By implementing role-based access controls, segregation of duties, access reviews, and database activity monitoring, organizations ensure that access is limited, controlled, and accountable. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through structured access assignment, monitoring, and periodic review. Continuous evaluation maintains effectiveness, reduces risk, and supports regulatory compliance. Proper documentation and integration with identity and access management systems strengthen oversight and governance.
Implementing role-based access controls, segregation of duties, access reviews, and monitoring is the most effective control for ensuring database access is restricted based on the principle of least privilege. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured database access controls provide preventive and detective assurance, reduce operational and security risks, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 116
Which audit procedure is most effective for verifying that mobile devices accessing corporate systems are secure and compliant with organizational policies?
A) Reviewing mobile device management (MDM) configurations, compliance reports, access logs, and security policies
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Reviewing mobile device management configurations, compliance reports, access logs, and security policies is the most effective audit procedure for verifying that mobile devices accessing corporate systems are secure and compliant with organizational policies. Mobile devices, including smartphones, tablets, and laptops, increasingly provide access to corporate networks, applications, and sensitive data. If these devices are unsecured, lost, or compromised, they can serve as vectors for data breaches, malware infection, unauthorized access, or operational disruptions. Mobile device management systems enforce security configurations, such as device encryption, password policies, remote wipe capabilities, application restrictions, and operating system updates, ensuring that devices meet organizational security standards before accessing corporate systems. Compliance reports generated by MDM tools provide auditors with evidence that devices adhere to policies, identifying noncompliant devices and highlighting exceptions. Access logs detail device connections, login attempts, and access patterns, allowing auditors to detect unusual behavior, policy violations, or potential threats. Reviewing security policies confirms that mobile device requirements align with organizational objectives, regulatory mandates, and risk management practices. This approach provides preventive assurance by enforcing security controls and compliance before devices can access systems and detective assurance by monitoring activity and reporting noncompliance. Auditors can examine MDM configurations, compliance dashboards, access logs, and policy documentation to verify that mobile devices comply with security standards, safeguard corporate data, and meet regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. Effective mobile device management reduces the risk of data loss, unauthorized access, malware propagation, and regulatory penalties. Continuous monitoring, periodic audits, and updates to device configurations maintain ongoing protection against emerging threats and evolving device technologies. Integration with endpoint security, authentication, and network access control strengthens organizational security posture and ensures that only compliant devices are authorized. Proper documentation of compliance enforcement, audit findings, and remediation measures provides evidence for internal and external audits and supports accountability. By reviewing MDM configurations, compliance reports, access logs, and policies, auditors can confirm that mobile devices meet organizational security standards, are monitored for compliance, and mitigate associated risks. Preventive measures protect systems proactively, while detective procedures identify issues for timely resolution. Continuous improvement ensures that mobile device security remains aligned with organizational needs, technological changes, and evolving threats.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring may detect anomalies, but it does not verify that mobile devices are secure or compliant, nor does it enforce organizational policies.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects devices from malware, ransomware, and viruses. While antivirus software is essential, it does not confirm that mobile devices comply with organizational policies or meet MDM requirements. Endpoint protection complements MDM but cannot replace its enforcement capabilities.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about mobile device security policies, safe practices, and compliance obligations. Awareness reduces risky behavior but does not technically enforce security configurations, monitor compliance, or provide audit evidence. Training alone is insufficient to secure mobile devices accessing corporate systems.
By reviewing MDM configurations, compliance reports, access logs, and policies, auditors can ensure mobile devices are secure, monitored, and compliant. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through configuration enforcement, monitoring, and reporting. Continuous evaluation ensures devices remain compliant and risks are mitigated effectively. Proper documentation supports accountability, regulatory compliance, and internal governance.
Reviewing mobile device management configurations, compliance reports, access logs, and security policies is the most effective audit procedure for ensuring mobile devices are secure and compliant. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured MDM oversight provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.
Question 117
Which control is most effective for ensuring that email systems are protected from phishing and malicious attachments?
A) Implementing email security gateways, anti-phishing filters, attachment scanning, and user awareness programs
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing email security gateways, anti-phishing filters, attachment scanning, and user awareness programs is the most effective control for ensuring that email systems are protected from phishing and malicious attachments. Email is a primary communication tool in organizations, but is also a common vector for cyberattacks, including phishing, malware, ransomware, and business email compromise. Email security gateways filter incoming and outgoing messages, blocking malicious content, known malware signatures, suspicious links, and spam. Anti-phishing filters detect and prevent fraudulent emails, analyze sender reputation, domain authenticity, and message content, and provide warnings to recipients about potential phishing attempts. Attachment scanning inspects email attachments for malicious code, malware, or ransomware, ensuring that only safe content reaches users. User awareness programs educate personnel on recognizing phishing attempts, avoiding unsafe links, verifying sender identities, and following proper reporting procedures. This integrated control provides preventive assurance by blocking or filtering malicious emails before they reach users and detective assurance by monitoring and alerting on suspicious activity, enabling a timely response. Auditors can review email gateway configurations, filtering rules, monitoring reports, incident logs, and awareness training records to ensure that email systems are protected, policies are enforced, and users are prepared to respond to threats. Effective email security reduces the risk of data breaches, credential compromise, financial loss, and operational disruptions. Continuous monitoring, updates, and testing of email filters and scanning tools ensure that emerging threats are addressed promptly and that anti-phishing mechanisms remain effective. Integration with endpoint security, network monitoring, and incident response processes strengthens organizational defense and ensures rapid containment of threats. Proper documentation of configurations, monitoring alerts, incident responses, and training activities provides evidence for auditors, supports compliance with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, and demonstrates accountability. By combining technical controls, monitoring, and user education, organizations maintain a robust email security posture, protecting sensitive information and reducing operational and reputational risks. Preventive measures block threats proactively, while detective measures identify potential breaches for timely remediation. Continuous improvement ensures that email systems remain resilient against evolving phishing techniques, malware, and social engineering attacks.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not prevent phishing or malicious attachments and cannot ensure email security or compliance.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects devices from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus enhances security but does not specifically filter or block phishing emails or malicious attachments before they reach users. Endpoint protection complements email security but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about phishing threats and safe email practices. Awareness reduces the likelihood of user error but does not technically block malicious messages, scan attachments, or provide monitoring capabilities. Training alone cannot ensure email system protection.
By implementing email security gateways, anti-phishing filters, attachment scanning, and user awareness programs, organizations provide comprehensive protection against email-borne threats. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through filtering, monitoring, and education. Continuous evaluation and updates maintain effectiveness against evolving email threats, reducing risk and supporting compliance.
Implementing email security gateways, anti-phishing filters, attachment scanning, and user awareness programs is the most effective control for protecting email systems from phishing and malicious attachments. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Integrated email security measures provide preventive and detective assurance, reduce operational and security risks, and maintain regulatory compliance.
Question 118
Which control is most effective for ensuring that critical software changes are implemented without introducing vulnerabilities or errors?
A) Implementing a formal change management process with testing, approval, and post-implementation review
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing a formal change management process with testing, approval, and post-implementation review is the most effective control for ensuring that critical software changes are implemented without introducing vulnerabilities or errors. Software changes, including patches, upgrades, and new application deployments, can affect system functionality, security, and performance. If not managed properly, changes may result in downtime, security breaches, data loss, or compliance violations. A formal change management process ensures that all proposed changes are documented, assessed for risk, and evaluated for potential impact on the organization’s IT environment. Testing verifies that the change functions as intended, does not conflict with existing systems, and does not introduce vulnerabilities or performance issues. Approval from designated authorities ensures accountability, alignment with organizational priorities, and adherence to policies. Post-implementation reviews confirm that changes were implemented successfully, identify any issues, and provide lessons learned for future changes. This approach provides preventive assurance by controlling and mitigating the risk of errors or security gaps during implementation and detective assurance by evaluating outcomes and monitoring for anomalies after deployment. Auditors can review change management policies, documentation of proposed changes, test results, approval records, and post-implementation reports to confirm compliance with organizational standards and regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, NIST, SOX, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. Effective change management reduces the risk of system failures, operational disruptions, unauthorized modifications, and regulatory penalties. Continuous monitoring and audits of the change process ensure adherence to procedures, proper documentation, and timely corrective actions. Integration with configuration management, incident management, and risk management provides a comprehensive framework for secure and controlled software changes. Proper documentation supports accountability, audit readiness, and evidence for internal and external regulators. By implementing a structured change management process with testing, approval, and review, organizations maintain system reliability, security, and compliance while reducing operational and security risks. Preventive assurance is achieved through rigorous planning, testing, and authorization, while detective assurance is ensured by post-implementation monitoring and review. Continuous evaluation and refinement of the change management process ensure that it remains effective against evolving business needs, technologies, and threat landscapes. Organizations that follow formal change management procedures can implement software updates confidently, maintaining operational continuity, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder trust.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While network monitoring may detect anomalies, it does not ensure that software changes are secure, tested, or approved. It cannot prevent vulnerabilities or errors introduced by changes.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to overall security but does not govern software changes, testing, or approval processes. Endpoint protection complements change management but cannot replace formal procedures.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about change management policies and proper procedures. Awareness reduces human errors but does not technically enforce testing, approval, or post-implementation review. Training alone cannot ensure secure and reliable software changes.
By implementing a formal change management process with testing, approval, and review, organizations ensure that software modifications are controlled, secure, and aligned with organizational standards. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through structured procedures, verification, and monitoring. Continuous evaluation maintains effectiveness, mitigates risks, and supports regulatory compliance. Proper documentation enhances accountability, provides audit evidence, and strengthens operational governance.
Implementing a formal change management process with testing, approval, and post-implementation review is the most effective control for ensuring that software changes do not introduce vulnerabilities or errors. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured change management provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces operational and security risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.
Question 119
Which audit procedure is most effective for verifying that backups are performed regularly and can be restored successfully?
A) Reviewing backup schedules, restoration tests, backup logs, and storage policies
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Reviewing backup schedules, restoration tests, backup logs, and storage policies is the most effective audit procedure for verifying that backups are performed regularly and can be restored successfully. Backups are critical to protecting data and ensuring operational continuity in the event of system failures, data corruption, human error, or cyberattacks. A structured backup process involves scheduling regular backups based on data criticality and recovery objectives, such as recovery point objective (RPO) and recovery time objective (RTO). Restoration tests verify that backup copies are complete, accurate, and functional, ensuring that data can be recovered within the defined recovery objectives. Backup logs provide evidence that backups are performed according to schedule, track successful and failed operations, and allow auditors to detect irregularities or missed backups. Storage policies define how backups are stored, retained, encrypted, and protected from physical or logical threats, including off-site or cloud storage for redundancy and disaster recovery. This integrated approach provides preventive assurance by safeguarding data through systematic backups and detective assurance by validating that backups are successful, accurate, and recoverable. Auditors can examine backup schedules, logs, test results, and storage policies to confirm compliance with organizational standards, regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, and best practices for data protection. Effective backup management reduces the risk of data loss, operational disruption, financial loss, and reputational damage. Continuous monitoring of backup performance, periodic restoration tests, and review of logs ensure ongoing effectiveness and reliability. Integration with disaster recovery, incident response, and data retention policies provides a holistic approach to information security and business continuity. Proper documentation supports accountability, audit readiness, and evidence of compliance with internal and external regulations. By reviewing backup schedules, restoration tests, backup logs, and storage policies, auditors can validate that data protection practices are effective, complete, and aligned with organizational priorities. Preventive measures reduce the likelihood of data loss, while detective measures identify issues promptly for corrective action. Continuous evaluation and improvement of backup procedures ensure reliability as technology, data volume, and business needs evolve. Organizations that implement effective backup verification procedures can recover critical data quickly, minimize operational impact, and maintain stakeholder confidence.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. While bandwidth monitoring can detect network performance issues, it does not verify that backups are performed, complete, or restorable. It cannot ensure preventive or detective assurance for data protection.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus contributes to endpoint security but does not confirm that backups occur, are complete, or can be restored. Endpoint protection complements backup procedures but cannot replace verification.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about backup policies, responsibilities, and procedures. Awareness supports proper behavior but does not technically enforce backups or validate recoverability. Training alone cannot ensure data protection and recoverability.
By reviewing backup schedules, restoration tests, backup logs, and storage policies, organizations ensure that backups are consistent, reliable, and recoverable. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through systematic procedures, testing, and monitoring. Continuous evaluation maintains effectiveness, reduces risks, and ensures regulatory compliance. Proper documentation supports accountability and audit readiness.
Reviewing backup schedules, restoration tests, backup logs, and storage policies is the most effective audit procedure for ensuring that backups are performed regularly and are restorable. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured backup verification provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces operational and data risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.
Question 120
Which control is most effective for ensuring that access to privileged accounts is monitored and controlled?
A) Implementing privileged access management (PAM) tools, session monitoring, approval workflows, and periodic audits
B) Monitoring network bandwidth usage
C) Performing endpoint antivirus scans
D) Conducting annual security awareness training
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing privileged access management tools, session monitoring, approval workflows, and periodic audits is the most effective control for ensuring that access to privileged accounts is monitored and controlled. Privileged accounts, such as administrators or root users, provide elevated access to systems, applications, and critical data. Uncontrolled access to these accounts poses significant security risks, including unauthorized changes, data breaches, and disruption of operations. Privileged access management tools centralize control over privileged credentials, enforce strong authentication, rotate passwords, and limit access to authorized users only. Session monitoring records activities performed by privileged users, enabling visibility into commands executed, changes made, and potential policy violations. Approval workflows require authorization before granting temporary or permanent privileged access, providing accountability and alignment with organizational policies. Periodic audits review privileged access logs, validate adherence to policies, and detect anomalies, ensuring that access remains appropriate and controlled. This integrated approach provides preventive assurance by limiting and controlling access and detective assurance by monitoring activities and verifying compliance. Auditors can review PAM configurations, session recordings, approval documentation, and audit reports to confirm that privileged accounts are managed securely, aligned with organizational standards, and compliant with regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOX, and HIPAA. Effective management of privileged accounts reduces the risk of insider threats, unauthorized changes, security breaches, and operational disruptions. Continuous monitoring, regular audits, and automated enforcement ensure ongoing compliance, timely detection of misuse, and alignment with organizational security policies. Integration with identity and access management, change management, and incident response provides comprehensive oversight and strengthens security posture. Proper documentation of access approvals, session monitoring, and audit findings supports accountability, evidence for regulators, and governance. By implementing PAM tools, session monitoring, approval workflows, and periodic audits, organizations maintain tight control over privileged accounts, reduce security risks, and ensure compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. Preventive measures mitigate unauthorized access, while detective measures identify potential misuse for timely corrective action. Continuous evaluation and improvement maintain effectiveness as systems, applications, and threat landscapes evolve, ensuring secure administration of critical resources.
Monitoring network bandwidth usage evaluates throughput, latency, and traffic patterns. Bandwidth monitoring does not control, monitor, or enforce privileged account access and cannot prevent misuse or unauthorized activities.
Performing endpoint antivirus scans protects systems from malware, ransomware, and viruses. Antivirus enhances security but does not monitor privileged account activities or enforce access restrictions. Endpoint protection complements privileged access management but cannot replace it.
Conducting annual security awareness training educates personnel about secure access practices and privileged account responsibilities. Awareness reduces risk from human error but does not technically control, monitor, or audit privileged accounts. Training alone cannot ensure secure access.
By implementing privileged access management tools, session monitoring, approval workflows, and periodic audits, organizations maintain controlled, accountable, and monitored access to privileged accounts. Preventive and detective assurance is achieved through access control, activity monitoring, and periodic review. Continuous evaluation ensures compliance, mitigates risks, and strengthens governance and security posture. Proper documentation supports audits, accountability, and regulatory compliance.
Implementing privileged access management tools, session monitoring, approval workflows, and periodic audits is the most effective control for ensuring that privileged accounts are monitored and controlled. Network monitoring, antivirus scanning, and awareness training support objectives but do not provide comprehensive assurance. Structured privileged access management provides preventive and detective assurance, reduces security risks, and maintains regulatory compliance.