Checkpoint 156-215.81.20 Certified Security Administrator — R81.20 (CCSA) Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q76-90

Checkpoint 156-215.81.20 Certified Security Administrator — R81.20 (CCSA) Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q76-90

Visit here for our full Checkpoint 156-215.81.20 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 76

Which Check Point blade protects malicious files by removing active content such as macros, scripts, or embedded objects before delivery to users?

A) Threat Extraction
B) IPS
C) Anti-Spam and Email Security
D) Application Control

Answer: A) Threat Extraction

Explanation:

Threat Extraction is a proactive security blade that sanitizes documents by stripping out potentially harmful active content before the file reaches the user. Active content includes macros, embedded scripts, and other executable elements that attackers often use to deliver malware. By removing these risky components, Threat Extraction ensures that users receive safe, clean versions of files without compromising productivity.

This blade is particularly effective against zero-day threats, which exploit vulnerabilities that have not yet been patched or publicly disclosed. Unlike signature-based detection methods, Threat Extraction does not rely on identifying known malware. Instead, it takes a preventive approach by eliminating risky elements. This makes it a powerful complement to Threat Emulation, which analyzes files in a sandbox environment to detect malicious behavior. Together, these blades provide layered defense against both known and unknown threats.

IPS focuses on blocking exploit attempts but does not sanitize documents. Anti-Spam and Email Security protects email traffic but does not remove active content from files. Application Control governs application usage but does not sanitize documents.

Therefore, Threat Extraction is the correct answer because it protects malicious files by removing active content such as macros, scripts, or embedded objects before delivery to users.

Question 77

Which Check Point utility is used to stop all Check Point processes on a gateway, including the firewall engine and management daemons?

A) cpstop
B) fw stat
C) cpconfig
D) cphaprob stat

Answer: A) cpstop

Explanation:

The cpstop command halts all Check Point processes running on a gateway. This includes the firewall engine, management daemons, and other related services. Administrators use cpstop when they need to perform maintenance, troubleshoot issues, or temporarily disable enforcement. By stopping all processes, cpstop effectively disables the gateway’s ability to enforce security policies.

This command is powerful and should be used with caution, as it leaves the gateway unprotected until processes are restarted. Typically, administrators follow cpstop with cpstart to restart processes once maintenance is complete.

The fw stat command displays the current installed policy name, but does not stop processes. The cpconfig utility configures system parameters such as Secure Internal CCommunication but does not stop processes. The cphaprob stat command shows cluster status but does not stop processes.

Therefore, cpstop is the correct answer because it is used to stop all Check Point processes on a gateway, including the firewall engine and management daemons.

Question 78

Which Check Point blade protects malicious websites by decrypting SSL/TLS traffic and applying security policies?

A) HTTPS Inspection
B) IPS
C) URL Filtering
D) Threat Emulation

Answer: A) HTTPS Inspection

Explanation:

HTTPS Inspection is a blade that enables security controls to be applied to encrypted traffic. With the majority of internet traffic now encrypted using SSL/TLS, attackers often hide malicious payloads within secure sessions. Without HTTPS Inspection, this traffic would bypass security controls, creating blind spots in the network.

The HTTPS Inspection blade decrypts traffic, applies security policies, and then re-encrypts it before forwarding. This allows administrators to detect threats hidden in encrypted sessions, such as malware downloads, phishing attempts, or command-and-control communications. By inspecting encrypted traffic, organizations can ensure that security policies are applied consistently across all traffic.

IPS inspects traffic for exploit attempts but does not decrypt SSL/TLS traffic. URL Filtering categorizes websites but does not decrypt SSL/TLS traffic. Threat Emulation analyzes files in a sandbox but does not decrypt SSL/TLS traffic.

Therefore, HTTPS Inspection is the correct answer because it protects against malicious websites by decrypting SSL/TLS traffic and applying security policies.

Question 79

Which Check Point blade protects malicious traffic by enforcing user- and group-based policies across applications and websites?

A) Identity Awareness
B) IPS
C) Threat Emulation
D) Anti-Bot

Answer: A) Identity Awareness

Explanation:

Identity Awareness is a blade that integrates user and group identity into security policies. Traditionally, firewalls enforce rules based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols. However, in modern environments where users move between devices and networks, IP-based enforcement is insufficient. Identity Awareness solves this by tying traffic to specific users or groups, regardless of the device or IP address.

This blade integrates with directory services such as Active Directory, LDAP, and RADIUS to obtain user information. It can also leverage authentication methods like Captive Portal, Kerberos, or multifactor authentication. Once user identity is established, administrators can enforce granular policies. For example, marketing staff may be allowed access to social media sites, while finance staff are restricted. Similarly, administrators can block specific applications for certain groups while allowing them for others.

IPS inspects traffic for exploit attempts but does not enforce user-based policies. Threat Emulation analyzes files in a sandbox but does not enforce user-based policies. Anti-Bot detects botnet communications but does not enforce user-based policies.

Therefore, Identity Awareness is the correct answer because it protects malicious traffic by enforcing user- and group-based policies across applications and websites.

Question 80

Which Check Point utility is used to configure basic system parameters, such as Secure Internal Communication (SIC), during initial setup?

A) cpconfig
B) cpstop
C) fw stat
D) cphaprob stat

Answer: A) cpconfig

Explanation:

The cpconfig utility is an interactive tool used to configure basic system parameters during initial setup. One of its primary functions is to establish Secure Internal Communication (SIC), which is the foundation of secure communication between gateways and the management server. SIC uses certificates and trust relationships to ensure that policies can be securely pushed to gateways and logs can be sent back to the management server.

During initial setup, administrators run cpconfig to enter a SIC password, which generates certificates and establishes trust. This process is critical for enabling centralized management. Without SIC, gateways cannot receive updated policies or send logs, effectively breaking the management architecture.

The cpstop command halts all Check Point processes but does not configure system parameters. The fw stat command displays the current installed policy but does not configure system parameters. The cphaprob stat command shows cluster status but does not configure system parameters.

Therefore, cpconfig is the correct answer because it is used to configure basic system parameters such as Secure Internal Communication during initial setup.

Question 81

Which Check Point blade protects malicious traffic by analyzing SSL/TLS-encrypted sessions and applying security policies?

A) HTTPS Inspection
B) IPS
C) Application Control
D) Threat Extraction

Answer: A) HTTPS Inspection

Explanation:

HTTPS Inspection is a critical security blade in the Check Point architecture that addresses one of the most significant challenges in modern network security: the widespread use of SSL and TLS encryption. Today, the vast majority of web traffic is encrypted using these protocols to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data in transit. While encryption is vital for maintaining privacy and securing sensitive information, it also presents a challenge for network security because encrypted traffic can become a blind spot for traditional security measures. Attackers exploit this by hiding malicious payloads, phishing links, or command-and-control communications within encrypted sessions, knowing that these threats are far less likely to be detected by conventional security tools. HTTPS Inspection is designed to eliminate this blind spot by enabling security controls to inspect and enforce policies on encrypted traffic without compromising the confidentiality of communications.

The primary function of HTTPS Inspection is to decrypt SSL/TLS traffic as it passes through the security gateway, analyze the contents of the session for potential threats, enforce security policies, and then re-encrypt the traffic before forwarding it to its intended destination. This process ensures that all traffic, whether encrypted or unencrypted, is subjected to the same security scrutiny, eliminating the possibility of encrypted traffic bypassing protective measures. For example, if a user downloads a file from a secure website that contains malware or attempts to access a phishing site over HTTPS, the traffic would normally bypass standard inspection mechanisms due to encryption. With HTTPS Inspection, the blade decrypts the session, analyzes the file or request, applies security policies to block or allow the action, and then re-encrypts the traffic, ensuring that the user receives a secure and compliant experience. This capability is essential in modern environments where the majority of web and cloud-based traffic is encrypted, and threats increasingly rely on SSL/TLS to evade detection.

HTTPS Inspection works in conjunction with other Check Point blades to provide a comprehensive security posture. For instance, the blade integrates with Antivirus, Anti-Bot, IPS, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction to ensure that all potential threats are inspected even within encrypted sessions. Antivirus can scan files for malware during HTTPS sessions, Threat Emulation can analyze suspicious files in a sandbox environment, and Threat Extraction can sanitize documents to remove active content such as macros or scripts. The combination of HTTPS Inspection with these blades ensures layered protection against both known and unknown threats, offering defense in depth. By decrypting traffic, these blades can apply their full capabilities, ensuring that encryption does not become a haven for malicious activity.

Without HTTPS Inspection, encrypted traffic effectively becomes invisible to many security measures. IPS, for example, is designed to inspect traffic for exploit attempts and protocol anomalies, protecting against vulnerabilities in applications and operating systems. However, without the ability to decrypt SSL/TLS traffic, IPS cannot analyze encrypted sessions, allowing attackers to deliver malicious payloads without detection. Application Control, while effective at monitoring and enforcing policies on application usage, does not inspect the content of encrypted sessions and cannot prevent malware or phishing attempts hidden within HTTPS traffic. Threat Extraction, which sanitizes documents by removing risky elements, similarly cannot operate on encrypted traffic unless it is first decrypted. These limitations highlight the unique and essential role of HTTPS Inspection in modern cybersecurity frameworks, as it ensures that encrypted traffic is not exempt from security enforcement.

The increasing adoption of encryption across web applications, cloud services, email platforms, and mobile applications has made HTTPS Inspection indispensable. Attackers frequently exploit encrypted channels to deliver malware, steal credentials, or conduct command-and-control operations without being detected. By decrypting and inspecting this traffic in real time, HTTPS Inspection mitigates these risks and ensures that organizations maintain comprehensive visibility and control over all network communications. Additionally, HTTPS Inspection supports compliance and auditing requirements, as organizations can demonstrate that security policies are consistently applied to all traffic, including encrypted sessions.

Another critical aspect of HTTPS Inspection is its ability to maintain privacy and secure communications while performing its functions. After inspection and policy enforcement, traffic is re-encrypted before being forwarded, ensuring that sensitive information is protected throughout the transmission process. This is particularly important for organizations that handle confidential data, financial information, or personally identifiable information, as it allows security enforcement without violating privacy standards or regulatory requirements.

HTTPS Inspection is the correct solution for protecting networks against threats hidden within encrypted traffic because it enables organizations to analyze SSL/TLS sessions, detect malicious activity, enforce security policies, and integrate seamlessly with other security blades for comprehensive protection. IPS, Application Control, and Threat Extraction provide important protections in their respective domains, but cannot inspect encrypted traffic on their own. By decrypting, analyzing, enforcing policies, and re-encrypting traffic, HTTPS Inspection ensures that encrypted sessions do not become a loophole for attackers and that security enforcement is consistently applied across all network communications. This capability is essential in today’s security landscape, where the majority of threats exploit encrypted traffic to evade detection, making HTTPS Inspection a critical component of a robust cybersecurity strategy.

Question 82

Which Check Point blade protects malicious traffic by enforcing granular control over application usage regardless of port or protocol?

A) Application Control
B) IPS
C) Threat Extraction
D) Anti-Spam and Email Security

Answer: A) Application Control

Explanation:

Application Control is a critical security blade in the Check Point architecture that enables organizations to gain detailed visibility into applications running on their network and enforce precise usage policies. In modern IT environments, applications are no longer confined to well-known ports or protocols. Many popular applications use dynamic ports, encrypted channels, or tunneling techniques to bypass traditional network controls, making it difficult for conventional firewalls to enforce policies effectively. Application Control addresses these challenges by inspecting network traffic at the application layer, identifying applications based on their signatures and behavioral patterns rather than relying solely on port numbers or IP addresses. This approach allows administrators to recognize and categorize applications even when they attempt to evade detection, providing a level of control that is necessary in contemporary, highly dynamic network environments.

The blade allows administrators to enforce highly granular policies on application usage. For instance, an organization may decide to allow access to social media platforms like Facebook for business purposes but block specific features such as Facebook games, which could reduce productivity or introduce security risks. Similarly, Skype for Business might be permitted for voice and video calls but restricted for file transfers to prevent sensitive data from being sent externally without authorization. By applying such precise rules, Application Control ensures that applications are used in compliance with organizational policies while still supporting legitimate business activities. This capability reduces security risks, prevents misuse of network resources, and supports regulatory compliance by enforcing defined access rules consistently across the network.

Integration with Identity Awareness further enhances the functionality of Application Control. Identity Awareness allows policies to be applied based on the user or group identity rather than solely on network parameters such as IP addresses. For example, the finance department may be allowed access to certain financial applications while restricting access to social media, whereas the marketing team may have broader access to web-based tools and social platforms. This integration ensures that policies are aligned with organizational roles and responsibilities, creating a more flexible and adaptive security framework. Additionally, reporting and logging capabilities within Application Control provide administrators with detailed insights into application usage patterns, helping identify policy violations, monitor compliance, and make informed decisions about policy adjustments.

When compared to other security blades, Application Control’s role is distinct and complementary. IPS, or Intrusion Prevention System, inspects network traffic for exploit attempts and protocol anomalies, blocking attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in operating systems or applications. While IPS is crucial for protecting against exploits and malware delivered over the network, it does not provide the ability to identify or control the usage of specific applications. Threat Extraction focuses on sanitizing documents by removing potentially harmful active content, such as macros or scripts, but does not govern which applications users can run. Anti-Spam and Email Security scans inbound and outbound email traffic to block spam, phishing attempts, and malicious attachments, but it is limited to email communication and does not enforce application usage policies. Each of these blades is important for maintaining a secure environment, but none offer the granular application-level control provided by Application Control.

The value of Application Control has increased as enterprise networks have become more complex and distributed, with a growing number of cloud-based and mobile applications. Many of these applications are designed to circumvent traditional network security measures, making it difficult to manage usage effectively without deep visibility into traffic. By identifying applications at the packet level and enforcing policies regardless of the port or protocol used, Application Control closes this gap, ensuring that security policies are comprehensive and enforceable. It also helps organizations reduce the risk of data leakage, limit exposure to malware, and maintain compliance with internal guidelines and external regulations.

Application Control is the correct choice for organizations that need to enforce granular policies on application usage while maintaining flexibility and productivity. Protects against potential threats and misuse by controlling application behavior at a detailed level, which other blades, such as IPS, Threat Extraction, or Anti-Spam and Email Security,, ty cannot achieve on their own. Through its combination of application identification, policy enforcement, user-aware rules, and reporting capabilities, Application Control enables organizations to maintain security while supporting legitimate business operations, making it an indispensable component of a modern cybersecurity strategy.

Question 83

Which Check Point utility is used to display the current state of high availability cluster members, including active and standby roles?

A) cphaprob stat
B) cpstop
C) fw stat
D) cpconfig

Answer: A) cphaprob stat

Explanation:

The cphaprob stat command is a diagnostic tool used to display the current state of high availability cluster members. It shows whether members are active or standby, whether synchronization is working, and whether interfaces are healthy. Administrators use it to confirm that redundancy is functioning correctly and that failover will occur as expected.

High availability clustering is critical for ensuring continuous service availability. If one gateway fails, another can take over seamlessly. The cphaprob stat command provides visibility into this process, helping administrators verify that clustering is working as intended.

The cpstop command halts all Check Point processes but does not display cluster status. The fw stat command displays the current installed policy but does not display cluster status. The cpconfig utility configures system parameters but does not display cluster status.

Therefore, cphaprob stat is the correct answer because it is used to display the current state of high availability cluster members, including active and standby roles.

Question 84

Which Check Point blade protects malicious email attachments by sanitizing files before delivery to users?

A) Threat Extraction
B) IPS
C) Anti-Bot
D) URL Filtering

Answer: A) Threat Extraction

Explanation:

Threat Extraction is a security blade within the Check Point ecosystem that provides an essential layer of protection by proactively sanitizing documents before they reach end users. Its primary purpose is to remove potentially harmful active content from files, such as macros, scripts, or embedded objects, which are often exploited by attackers to deliver malware or execute malicious instructions on user systems. Unlike traditional signature-based security solutions that rely on identifying known threats, Threat Extraction takes a proactive approach. It assumes that any active content in a file could be risky and removes it, delivering a clean, safe version of the document. This method is particularly effective against zero-day threats, which are new and unknown malware variants that have not yet been cataloged in signature databases. By removing potentially dangerous elements, Threat Extraction prevents infections while still allowing users to access the legitimate content of files, maintaining both security and productivity.

A practical example illustrates how Threat Extraction works in an email security scenario. Consider a situation where an employee receives an email containing a Word document with a malicious macro embedded in it. Macros are a common vector for malware because they can execute code automatically when the document is opened, often bypassing standard antivirus protections. When the document passes through the Check Point gateway with Threat Extraction enabled, the blade analyzes the file, detects the presence of the macro, and removes it. The user then receives a version of the document that contains the original content but is stripped of the potentially dangerous macro. This ensures that the organization remains protected from malware while allowing legitimate business activities to continue without disruption. The ability to deliver sanitized files rather than simply blocking suspicious attachments enhances user experience and reduces operational friction, as users do not need to request alternative versions of documents or delay work due to security concerns.

Threat Extraction also integrates with other Check Point security blades to provide a layered defense against threats. One notable integration is with Threat Emulation, which analyzes files in a sandboxed environment to detect malicious behavior that may not be visible through static analysis alone. While Threat Extraction focuses on proactively removing risky content, Threat Emulation complements this by observing how a file behaves when executed, detecting any actions that indicate malicious intent. Together, these two blades provide comprehensive protection against both known and unknown threats, covering a wide spectrum of attack vectors. This combination is particularly valuable in defending against sophisticated attacks that leverage advanced malware or employ multiple techniques to bypass traditional security measures.

In comparison, other Check Point blades serve important but distinct purposes. Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) inspects network traffic for exploit attempts and protocol anomalies, blocking attacks that attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in applications or operating systems. While IPS is essential for preventing exploitation, it does not sanitize documents or remove active content. Anti-Bot focuses on detecting and preventing botnet communications, identifying systems attempting to contact command-and-control servers, and stopping data exfiltration. While this is critical for containing malware infections, it does not address the risk posed by active content in files. URL Filtering categorizes websites and enforces access policies based on risk and reputation, protecting users from malicious websites but not from infected documents or email attachments. Each of these blades provides targeted security functions, but none of them replace the proactive content sanitization provided by Threat Extraction.

The significance of Threat Extraction in modern cybersecurity environments cannot be overstated. Email remains one of the most frequently exploited attack vectors, with attackers using sophisticated methods to deliver malware through documents, attachments, and links. Many attacks rely on exploiting active content to bypass conventional security mechanisms. By removing these components before delivery, Threat Extraction effectively neutralizes a major class of threats. Additionally, it allows organizations to maintain productivity by delivering safe versions of files rather than simply quarantining or blocking them, which could disrupt workflows and create operational challenges. Its proactive, content-focused approach complements signature-based security measures, sandboxing, and network-based protections, forming a crucial part of a comprehensive, multi-layered defense strategy.

Threat Extraction is the correct solution for protecting users against malicious email attachments because it directly addresses the risk posed by active content in files. Sanitizing documents prevents infections while preserving the usability of the content, integrates with other security blades for layered defense, and protects against both known and unknown threats. Unlike IPS, Anti-Bot, or URL Filtering, Threat Extraction specifically targets the removal of risky elements in documents, making it an indispensable tool in modern cybersecurity practices.

Question 85

Which Check Point blade protects malicious traffic by detecting and blocking suspicious DNS queries to known malicious domains?

A) DNS Security
B) IPS
C) Application Control
D) Threat Extraction

Answer: A) DNS Security

Explanation:

The DNS Security blade is designed to protect organizations from threats that exploit the Domain Name System (DNS). Attackers often use DNS queries to redirect users to malicious domains, establish command-and-control channels, or exfiltrate data. DNS Security monitors DNS traffic in real time, comparing queries against threat intelligence feeds to identify suspicious or malicious domains. When a match is found, the blade blocks the query and prevents the connection from being established.

This blade is critical because DNS is a fundamental protocol used by nearly all applications and services. Without DNS protection, attackers can easily bypass traditional security controls by hiding malicious activity within legitimate-looking queries. DNS Security integrates with Check Point’s ThreatCloud to receive continuous updates on malicious domains, ensuring that protections remain current.

IPS inspects traffic for exploit attempts but does not specifically monitor DNS queries. Application Control governs application usage but does not block malicious DNS queries. Threat Extraction sanitizes documents but does not monitor DNS traffic.

Therefore, DNS Security is the correct answer because it protects malicious traffic by detecting and blocking suspicious DNS queries to known malicious domains.

Question 86

Which Check Point utility is used to start all Check Point processes on a gateway after they have been stopped?

A) cpstart
B) cpstop
C) fw stat
D) cpconfig

Answer: A) cpstart

Explanation:

The cpstart command is a fundamental administrative tool in the Check Point security environment, specifically designed to initiate all processes that a gateway requires to function correctly. A Check Point gateway relies on multiple interdependent services to enforce security policies, communicate with the management server, and provide visibility into network events. These services include the firewall engine, which inspects and filters network traffic based on the installed security policy, and management daemons that handle communications between the gateway and the Check Point Security Management Server. In addition, several auxiliary processes support logging, monitoring, authentication, and other core functions necessary for the gateway to operate effectively. When a gateway has undergone maintenance, troubleshooting, or configuration changes, it is common practice for administrators to temporarily stop these processes using the cpstop command. While cpstop is essential for safely halting operations without causing data corruption or system conflicts, stopping the processes leaves the gateway inactive. Until cpstart is executed, the gateway cannot enforce policies or participate in network security, which creates a potential vulnerability. Therefore, cpstart serves as the mechanism to bring the gateway back online, reactivating all its services and restoring its role in the security infrastructure.

Using cpstart is not only about initiating processes; it is also about ensuring that the gateway resumes a fully functional and protected state. When executed, cpstart sequentially starts the firewall engine, management daemons, and other essential services. The firewall engine begins inspecting traffic according to the most recently installed policy, while management daemons reestablish secure communication channels with the Security Management Server. This reestablishment of trust is crucial because the gateway must synchronize with the management server to receive updates, report logs, and reflect any policy changes. Without cpstart, the gateway would remain in a non-operational state, leaving the network exposed to threats and reducing the effectiveness of the overall security deployment. Administrators rely on this command as part of routine maintenance procedures, after applying patches, performing hardware or software upgrades, or troubleshooting system issues. It is also critical during recovery scenarios, where a gateway may need to be restarted after unexpected downtime, such as system crashes or network failures, ensuring minimal disruption to security enforcement.

The cpstart command also plays a role in operational efficiency and administrative workflow. In complex environments with multiple gateways, administrators often coordinate maintenance windows to minimize impact on users and services. During these windows, processes on individual gateways or clusters may be stopped for updates, configuration changes, or inspections. After completing these tasks, running cpstart ensures that all processes resume in the correct order, dependencies are properly initialized, and the gateway resumes enforcing policies without errors. By centralizing the restart of processes into a single command, Check Point simplifies administrative procedures and reduces the risk of human error, which might occur if administrators attempted to start each process individually.

Other commands in the Check Point toolkit, while important, do not serve the same purpose as cpstart. For instance, the cpstop command is the counterpart used to safely stop all processes on a gateway, allowing maintenance or troubleshooting to occur without interference from active services. The fw stat command provides information about the currently installed security policy and firewall status, but does not influence process states or start services. Similarly, the cpconfig utility is designed for configuring system parameters, such as Secure Internal Communication, network interfaces, and other operational settings, but it does not initiate processes. These tools support the overall administration and configuration of gateways but cannot bring a gateway back online after processes have been halted.

The correct and intended use of cpstart is to ensure that a Check Point gateway returns to full operational status after a period of inactivity caused by process stoppage. It is a command that administrators must understand thoroughly because it directly affects network security and uptime. Using cpstart ensures that all dependent services are properly initialized, that security policies are enforced, and that the gateway can communicate effectively with the management server. In environments where uptime and security enforcement are critical, cpstart becomes indispensable, forming part of standard operating procedures for both routine maintenance and incident recovery. Its role is central to maintaining a secure, reliable, and resilient network environment, making it the correct choice for starting all Check Point processes on a gateway after they have been stopped.

Question 87

Which Check Point bladeprotectst malicious traffic by analyzing and blocking suspicious outbound data transfers to prevent data exfiltration?

A) Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
B) IPS
C) Anti-Bot
D) URL Filtering

Answer: A) Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation:

The Data Loss Prevention (DLP) blade is designed to monitor and control sensitive information leaving the network. It detects patterns such as credit card numbers, social security numbers, or confidential documents, and prevents unauthorized transmission. By enforcing policies on data movement, DLP ensures compliance with regulations and protects intellectual property.

This blade is critical for organizations that handle sensitive data, as it prevents accidental or malicious leaks. For example, if an employee attempts to send a spreadsheet containing customer data to an external email address, DLP can block the transmission and alert administrators. DLP integrates with identity awareness to provide user-specific controls, ensuring that policies reflect organizational roles and responsibilities.

IPS inspects traffic for exploit attempts but does not monitor outbound data transfers. Anti-Bot detects botnet communications but does not prevent data exfiltration. URL Filtering categorizes websites but does not monitor outbound data transfers.

Therefore, DLP is the correct answer because it protects against malicious traffic by analyzing and blocking suspicious outbound data transfers to prevent data exfiltration.

Question 88

Which Check Point blade protects against malicious traffic by analyzing and blocking suspicious file downloads in real time?

A) Antivirus
B) IPS
C) Threat Emulation
D) Application Control

Answer: A) Antivirus

Explanation:

The Antivirus blade is designed to scan traffic and files in real time, detecting and blocking viruses, worms, trojans, and other forms of malware. It uses a combination of signature-based detection, heuristics, and behavioral analysis to identify malicious content. By integrating with Check Point’s ThreatCloud intelligence, the Antivirus blade receives continuous updates on emerging threats, ensuring that protections remain current against the latest malware variants.

For example, if a user attempts to download a file from a suspicious website, the Antivirus blade will intercept the file, scan it, and block it if it matches known malware signatures or exhibits suspicious behavior. This proactive approach prevents infections before they reach endpoints, reducing the risk of data breaches and system compromise.

IPS inspects traffic for exploit attempts but does not specifically scan files for malware. Threat Emulation analyzes files in a sandbox but does not provide signature-based detection. Application Control governs application usage but does not scan files for malware.

Therefore, Antivirus is the correct answer because it provides protection against malicious traffic by analyzing and blocking suspicious file downloads in real time.

Question 89

Which Check Point utility is used to verify the installed software version on a gateway or management server?

A) fw ver
B) cpstop
C) cpconfig
D) cphaprob stat

Answer: A) fw ver

Explanation:

The fw ver command is used to display the installed software version on a gateway or management server. Administrators use this command to verify that the correct version is running and to troubleshoot compatibility issues. This command is critical for ensuring that gateways are up to date and that policies and features are supported.

For example, if an administrator suspects that a gateway is running an outdated version of Check Point software, running fw ver will confirm the version number. This information helps administrators plan upgrades and maintain consistency across the environment.

The cpstop command halts all Check Point processes but does not display the software version. The cpconfig utility configures system parameters but does not display the software version. The cphaprob stat command shows cluster status but does not display the software version.

Therefore, fw ver is the correct answer because it is used to verify the installed software version on a gateway or management server.

Question 90

Which Check Point blade provides protection against malicious traffic by enforcing policies on encrypted SSL/TLS sessions?

A) HTTPS Inspection
B) IPS
C) Threat Extraction
D) Anti-Spam and Email Security

Answer: A) HTTPS Inspection

Explanation:

The HTTPS Inspection blade is an advanced security feature that addresses a critical challenge in modern network security: the widespread use of SSL and TLS encryption. Today, the majority of internet traffic is encrypted, which means that traditional security controls, such as firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, and antivirus scanning, cannot inspect the contents of traffic that is transmitted over HTTPS. While encryption is essential for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of data in transit, it also provides a blind spot for attackers. Cybercriminals exploit this by hiding malicious payloads, phishing links, or command-and-control communications within encrypted sessions, knowing that these threats are less likely to be detected by conventional security tools. HTTPS Inspection solves this problem by allowing security controls to operate effectively on encrypted traffic, ensuring that malicious activity cannot bypass detection simply because it is hidden within SSL/TLS sessions.

The way HTTPS Inspection works is by intercepting encrypted traffic as it passes through the security gateway, decrypting it, applying the configured security policies, and then re-encrypting the traffic before sending it to its destination. This process allows the security blades, such as Antivirus, Anti-Bot, IPS, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction, to analyze traffic content as if it were unencrypted, detecting malware downloads, suspicious scripts, or phishing attempts that would otherwise remain hidden. For example, an employee may attempt to download a file from a website that appears legitimate but contains malware embedded in a secure connection. Without HTTPS Inspection, the file would pass through the network undetected because its contents are encrypted. With HTTPS Inspection, the traffic is decrypted, the file is scanned, and any malicious components are blocked, ensuring that the network remains protected while maintaining the confidentiality of the transmitted data. This process is seamless for the user, who experiences no disruption, yet the organization benefits from a full inspection of all traffic.

Another important aspect of HTTPS Inspection is that it allows organizations to enforce consistent security policies across all traffic, both encrypted and unencrypted. Modern web applications, cloud services, and email systems increasingly rely on encryption, and without the ability to inspect this traffic, security policies would be incomplete, leaving gaps that attackers can exploit. By applying policies uniformly to encrypted sessions, HTTPS Inspection ensures that web filtering, intrusion prevention, and malware detection are applied consistently, reducing the risk of successful attacks. Additionally, it integrates with identity awareness features, enabling administrators to apply rules based on users, groups, or departments, which provides granular control over how encrypted traffic is handled within the organization.

Comparing HTTPS Inspection to other security blades highlights its unique role. IPS, or Intrusion Prevention System, inspects traffic for exploit attempts and protocol anomalies, effectively preventing attacks that target vulnerabilities in applications or systems. However, IPS cannot decrypt SSL/TLS traffic on its own, meaning that encrypted threats could bypass its protections. Threat Extraction, which sanitizes documents by removing active content such as macros or scripts, is effective for removing risky elements in files but does not provide the ability to decrypt and inspect encrypted sessions. Anti-Spam and Email Security protects email traffic from spam, phishing, and malicious attachments but is focused solely on email and does not inspect general web traffic, particularly encrypted HTTPS sessions. While these blades provide essential protections, none of them can enforce security policies across encrypted traffic without the decryption capability provided by HTTPS Inspection.

The importance of HTTPS Inspection has grown as encryption has become the default for web traffic. Without it, organizations leave themselves vulnerable to hidden malware, data exfiltration, phishing attacks, and other threats transmitted via SSL/TLS. HTTPS Inspection closes this gap by enabling security tools to examine encrypted content in real time while maintaining user privacy and the integrity of secure communications. This capability is crucial for ensuring a comprehensive security posture, allowing organizations to detect, block, and respond to threats that attempt to exploit the blind spots created by encrypted traffic. By decrypting, inspecting, and re-encrypting SSL/TLS sessions, HTTPS Inspection ensures that security policies are consistently applied and that encrypted traffic does not become a safe harbor for attackers. It is the correct choice because it directly addresses the challenge of protecting networks against threats hidden within encrypted sessions, which cannot be effectively managed by IPS, Threat Extraction, or Anti-Spam and Email Security alone.