Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer — Professional DOP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 2 Q16-30
Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer — Professional DOP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 16
A DevOps engineer needs to deploy an application across multiple AWS regions with minimal latency for global users. The solution must automatically route users to the nearest healthy region. Which AWS service is the most suitable for this requirement?
A) Amazon Route 53
B) AWS CloudFront
C) Elastic Load Balancing
D) Amazon API Gateway
Answer: A) Amazon Route 53
Explanation:
Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable Domain Name System (DNS) web service that provides domain registration, DNS routing, and health checking. For multi-region deployments, Route 53 supports routing policies such as latency-based routing, geo-proximity routing, and failover routing. Latency-based routing directs users to the AWS region that provides the lowest network latency, ensuring minimal response times for global users. Route 53 health checks monitor the availability of endpoints in each region, and if a region becomes unhealthy, traffic can be automatically redirected to the nearest healthy region, maintaining service availability.
AWS CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that caches content at edge locations around the world to reduce latency. While CloudFront improves content delivery speed, it does not provide DNS-level routing to multiple application endpoints in different AWS regions. CloudFront is primarily used for static content delivery and dynamic content acceleration, but it cannot intelligently route users between separate regional deployments of an application. It complements Route 53 but cannot replace it for global routing and failover.
Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) distributes incoming application traffic across multiple instances within a single region. While ELB provides high availability, automatic scaling integration, and health checks, it operates within a specific region and does not route traffic across multiple regions. Using ELB alone would not ensure that global users are served by the closest region, as cross-region routing is not supported natively. ELB can be combined with Route 53, but it cannot handle the global latency-based routing requirement independently.
Amazon API Gateway is designed to manage APIs, including routing requests to backend services, throttling, caching, and security. It operates within a single region for API execution and does not provide automated multi-region routing for user requests. While API Gateway can integrate with multi-region backends, it lacks native DNS routing capabilities, making it unsuitable for automatically directing users to the nearest healthy region.
Amazon Route 53 is the optimal choice because it provides global DNS routing capabilities, latency-based routing, health checks, and automatic failover between regions. By using Route 53, the DevOps engineer can ensure that users are always directed to the nearest healthy region, reducing latency and improving the overall user experience. Route 53 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as ELB and CloudFront, allowing a combination of global routing, load balancing, and content delivery optimization. This solution also supports automated failover without manual intervention, which reduces operational complexity and ensures continuous application availability in the event of regional failures. Additionally, Route 53 allows routing decisions based on user location, health of endpoints, and traffic policies, providing granular control over global traffic management. In scenarios where high availability and low latency are critical, Route 53 is considered the standard approach for multi-region application deployments. By enabling latency-based routing along with health checks, organizations can achieve both resilience and optimal performance, which aligns with best practices for global AWS architectures.
Question 17
A DevOps team wants to automate the deployment of containerized applications while minimizing infrastructure management overhead. The application must run in a highly available and serverless environment. Which AWS service should be used?
A) AWS Fargate
B) Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling
C) Amazon Elastic Beanstalk with EC2
D) AWS Lambda
Answer: A) AWS Fargate
Explanation:
AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that works with both Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). It allows DevOps teams to run containers without provisioning or managing underlying servers. Fargate abstracts the infrastructure management, including scaling, patching, and cluster management, enabling teams to focus on application development and deployment. Each container runs in its isolated environment, enhancing security and resource isolation. Fargate supports automatic scaling, high availability, and integration with CloudWatch for monitoring, making it ideal for deploying containerized applications in a managed, serverless environment.
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling provides dynamic scaling of EC2 instances based on metrics or schedules. While it can support highly available containerized applications when combined with ECS or Kubernetes, the team still needs to manage the underlying EC2 instances, patch operating systems, and handle cluster management. This introduces operational overhead, which does not satisfy the requirement for a serverless, infrastructure-free deployment model. EC2 Auto Scaling is more suitable for non-serverless deployments where the team wants granular control over compute resources.
Amazon Elastic Beanstalk can deploy containerized applications on EC2 instances with managed load balancing, scaling, and monitoring. However, even though it abstracts some infrastructure management, it still relies on EC2 instances, and the team is responsible for the underlying instance health, AMI updates, and OS patches. Elastic Beanstalk is semi-managed but does not offer the full serverless experience that Fargate provides for container workloads.
AWS Lambda is a fully serverless compute service that can execute code without managing servers. While Lambda is serverless and can scale automatically, it is not designed to run long-lived containerized applications. It has execution time limits, memory constraints, and runtime environment restrictions that may not suit all containerized workloads. Lambda is ideal for event-driven functions, but Fargate is better for fully containerized applications requiring persistent processes, networking, and orchestration.
AWS Fargate is the correct solution because it offers fully serverless container orchestration with minimal operational management. It supports both ECS and EKS, integrates with IAM, VPC, and CloudWatch, and allows teams to focus on application development rather than infrastructure. By running containers without provisioning or managing EC2 instances, Fargate reduces complexity, improves security, and ensures high availability and scalability automatically. It also simplifies DevOps workflows by eliminating manual infrastructure management, supporting microservices architectures, and enabling easier integration with CI/CD pipelines. Fargate allows granular resource allocation per container and ensures isolation between workloads. Its serverless nature, combined with container orchestration, makes it the ideal choice for running highly available, production-grade containerized applications without traditional server management responsibilities.
Question 18
A company wants to implement automated notifications whenever critical infrastructure changes occur, such as modifications to security groups or IAM roles. Which AWS service combination is most suitable?
A) AWS CloudTrail + Amazon SNS
B) Amazon CloudWatch Logs + AWS Lambda
C) AWS Config + Amazon S3
D) AWS Systems Manager + AWS CloudFormation
Answer: A) AWS CloudTrail + Amazon SNS
Explanation:
AWS CloudTrail is a service that records API calls and changes made to AWS resources. It captures who made the call, which resources were affected, the action performed, and the timestamp. This allows auditing and tracking of critical infrastructure changes, including IAM role modifications, security group updates, and policy changes. By integrating CloudTrail with Amazon SNS (Simple Notification Service), alerts can be sent immediately whenever specific changes occur. This setup enables real-time notifications, ensuring that DevOps teams are aware of potential misconfigurations or security-relevant changes as soon as they happen.
Amazon CloudWatch Logs can collect logs from AWS services and applications, and AWS Lambda can process these logs. While this combination can be configured to detect events or patterns and trigger notifications, it requires custom log parsing, pattern matching, and automation logic. It does not provide out-of-the-box monitoring of all API-level changes or standardized alerts for infrastructure modifications, which increases operational complexity.
AWS Config continuously monitors and records AWS resource configurations, evaluating compliance with defined rules. While AWS Config can detect resource changes and compliance violations, notifications require integration with SNS or Lambda for real-time alerts. Additionally, Config focuses on resource configuration drift and compliance, rather than providing complete audit trails of every API call. CloudTrail offers a more detailed and complete record of who changed what, making it essential for auditing purposes.
AWS Systems Manager can automate tasks and manage resources, and CloudFormation can provision resources using infrastructure as code. While these tools help automate deployments or configuration updates, they do not provide real-time notifications of changes made outside the automation process. Therefore, relying solely on Systems Manager and CloudFormation would not meet the requirement for automatic notifications on unexpected critical changes.
Combining CloudTrail with Amazon SNS is the most effective solution because CloudTrail captures all relevant API calls and changes, while SNS delivers real-time notifications to DevOps teams. This ensures timely awareness of critical modifications, supports auditing, and strengthens security and compliance monitoring. By configuring CloudTrail to filter specific events, such as changes to IAM roles or security groups, teams can ensure alerts are meaningful and actionable. This approach enables automated monitoring, reduces the chance of missing critical changes, and integrates seamlessly with existing AWS security and operations workflows. CloudTrail’s ability to track every API call, combined with SNS’s immediate notification capability, provides a reliable and scalable solution for real-time infrastructure monitoring and alerting.
Question 19
A DevOps engineer is tasked with improving deployment speed and reducing the risk of downtime for a critical web application. The application runs on EC2 instances behind a load balancer, and the team wants the ability to instantly roll back to the previous version if a deployment fails. Which deployment strategy should be implemented?
A) Blue/Green deployment
B) Rolling deployment
C) In-place deployment
D) Canary deployment
Answer: A) Blue/Green deployment
Explanation:
Blue/Green deployment is a deployment strategy that involves creating two separate but identical environments: the blue environment (currently live) and the green environment (new version). When deploying a new application version, the green environment is updated and thoroughly tested while the blue environment continues serving production traffic. Once the green environment is validated, the load balancer switches traffic from the blue environment to the green environment instantly. This approach minimizes downtime, ensures zero impact on the live application, and provides a quick rollback option in case the new version has issues. If any problems are detected, traffic can be routed back to the blue environment, effectively rolling back to a stable version without significant operational risk.
Rolling deployment gradually replaces instances in the live environment with new instances running the updated version. While it reduces downtime compared to in-place deployments, it modifies live instances, which carries some risk. A rollback is more complex because some instances may already be updated, and additional coordination is required to revert all changes. Rolling deployments also expose a portion of users to potential errors during the update, which is not ideal for mission-critical applications.
In-place deployment updates the existing instances directly with the new version of the application. While this method is simple, it introduces the highest risk because the live environment is being modified in real-time. Any issues or errors during the deployment immediately impact all users. Rolling back to the previous version requires restoring instances from backups or manually reverting changes, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. In-place deployment is not suitable for applications that require high availability and minimal downtime.
Canary deployment releases the new version to a small subset of instances or users before gradually rolling it out to the entire environment. While it is a safe approach for detecting issues early and minimizing impact, it does not provide an instant rollback mechanism for the entire environment. Users on the canary release are exposed to potential bugs, and additional monitoring is required to expand or retract the deployment. Although canary deployments reduce risk, they are slower to achieve full rollout and do not guarantee immediate rollback to a fully stable environment.
Blue/Green deployment is the best choice because it fully isolates the new version from the production environment, provides zero-downtime updates, allows complete testing before traffic switching, and enables immediate rollback if issues occur. It integrates seamlessly with load balancers, CI/CD pipelines, and monitoring tools. This approach reduces operational risk, simplifies rollback procedures, and enhances overall application availability and reliability. For high-stakes applications, blue/green deployment ensures a consistent user experience while enabling teams to deploy rapidly and safely. By maintaining two parallel environments, DevOps engineers gain confidence in updates, avoid service interruptions, and provide a predictable deployment workflow that is highly aligned with AWS best practices.
Question 20
A company wants to ensure that all EC2 instances launched in a specific VPC comply with security baseline configurations. Deviations should trigger automatic notifications and remediation. Which AWS service combination is most suitable for this scenario?
A) AWS Config + AWS Systems Manager
B) Amazon CloudWatch + Amazon SNS
C) AWS CloudTrail + AWS Lambda
D) AWS Trusted Advisor + AWS CloudFormation
Answer: A) AWS Config + AWS Systems Manager
Explanation:
AWS Config is a service that continuously monitors and records AWS resource configurations. It allows DevOps teams to define rules that represent compliance policies or security baselines. For example, Config rules can verify that EC2 instances have the correct IAM roles, security groups, patch levels, or encryption settings. When an instance is found to be non-compliant, AWS Config can generate notifications, record the violation, and trigger automated remediation workflows. Config rules are flexible, can be customized for complex requirements, and provide detailed compliance reporting.
AWS Systems Manager complements AWS Config by enabling automated remediation. For example, when Config identifies a non-compliant EC2 instance, Systems Manager Automation documents (runbooks) can automatically remediate the issue, such as updating security settings, patching the operating system, or changing IAM roles. This combination allows both detection and automated enforcement of security baselines, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving overall compliance posture.
Amazon CloudWatch monitors metrics, collects logs, and can trigger alarms based on thresholds. While CloudWatch can alert teams to certain conditions, it does not natively track resource configuration compliance or enforce security baselines. CloudWatch alone cannot determine whether an EC2 instance is compliant with a specific security policy or automatically remediate deviations, limiting its effectiveness for this scenario.
AWS CloudTrail records API activity and provides audit logs for security and compliance. While CloudTrail can show who made changes to resources, it does not automatically detect policy violations, enforce security standards, or remediate misconfigurations. CloudTrail is better suited for auditing and forensic analysis rather than real-time compliance management.
AWS Trusted Advisor provides recommendations for cost optimization, security, and performance improvements, but it is not real-time and does not actively enforce policies on newly launched instances. It is advisory rather than automated, and relying on Trusted Advisor alone does not meet the requirement for proactive compliance and remediation.
AWS CloudFormation is used for infrastructure provisioning, but does not monitor ongoing resource compliance. It ensures resources are initially deployed correctly, but cannot guarantee continuous adherence to security policies after deployment.
Combining AWS Config and Systems Manager is the most suitable approach because Config continuously monitors resources for compliance violations and triggers automated actions through Systems Manager. This ensures that EC2 instances launched in a VPC adhere to security baselines immediately, deviations are remediated automatically, and alerts are sent to operations teams. This approach improves security, reduces human error, and ensures regulatory compliance by enforcing consistent configuration across all instances. The integration allows teams to define detailed compliance policies, execute automated runbooks, and maintain continuous visibility, making it the recommended solution for proactive infrastructure governance.
Question 21
A DevOps engineer wants to ensure that application metrics, logs, and traces from multiple AWS services are available in a single location for correlation and troubleshooting. Which AWS service provides the most comprehensive solution?
A) Amazon CloudWatch Observability
B) AWS CloudTrail
C) Amazon S3
D) AWS Config
Answer: A) Amazon CloudWatch Observability
Explanation:
Amazon CloudWatch Observability provides a centralized platform for monitoring, logging, and tracing across multiple AWS services and applications. It collects metrics, logs, and distributed traces, allowing DevOps engineers to correlate events and detect issues across complex environments. With unified observability, developers can analyze application performance, identify bottlenecks, and troubleshoot errors quickly. CloudWatch Observability integrates with ECS, Lambda, API Gateway, RDS, and custom applications, providing end-to-end visibility for both infrastructure and application-level performance.
AWS CloudTrail records API calls and tracks changes to AWS resources. While it is valuable for auditing and compliance, it does not provide real-time performance monitoring, centralized logging of application events, or tracing across distributed systems. CloudTrail alone cannot correlate metrics and logs to identify performance bottlenecks or errors in application code.
Amazon S3 can store logs and metrics, but it is a passive storage solution. Storing logs in S3 does not provide real-time analysis, correlation, or visualization. Additional tools such as Athena or third-party software are required to query, analyze, and correlate data. S3 does not provide native integration with alarms, dashboards, or distributed tracing.
AWS Config monitors resource configuration changes and enforces compliance with predefined rules. While it is useful for governance and auditing, it does not provide application-level metrics, log aggregation, or distributed tracing. Config is focused on detecting deviations from desired configurations rather than end-to-end observability of performance and operational metrics.
Amazon CloudWatch Observability is the most comprehensive solution because it provides a single pane of glass for metrics, logs, and traces, enabling correlation of events across multiple AWS services. Engineers can visualize system behavior, detect anomalies, and respond to incidents faster. CloudWatch Observability supports dashboards, alarms, and integrations with incident response workflows. It allows tracing of requests across services, aggregation of logs from EC2, Lambda, and containers, and visualization of application performance alongside infrastructure health. This approach enables proactive monitoring, faster troubleshooting, and improved reliability of applications. By centralizing observability, teams gain operational insight into complex architectures and reduce the time required to identify root causes of performance issues or failures.
Question 22
A DevOps engineer wants to implement automated security scanning for container images stored in Amazon ECR before deployment to production. Which AWS service is best suited for this purpose?
A) Amazon ECR image scanning
B) AWS Inspector
C) AWS Config
D) AWS CloudTrail
Answer: A) Amazon ECR image scanning
Explanation:
Amazon ECR image scanning is a native feature of Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) that automatically scans container images for vulnerabilities using the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database. By enabling image scanning, DevOps teams can ensure that any new or updated container image pushed to the repository is checked for security vulnerabilities before it is deployed to production. This helps prevent deploying images that contain known security issues. ECR image scanning integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, allowing automated scans to occur as part of build or deployment processes. It also provides detailed reports with severity levels and recommended actions, enabling teams to prioritize remediation effectively.
AWS Inspector is a vulnerability management service primarily for EC2 instances and other AWS workloads. It assesses the operating system and installed packages for vulnerabilities, but does not natively scan container images stored in ECR. While Inspector can complement image scanning by monitoring deployed workloads, it does not replace native ECR scanning for pre-deployment security checks.
AWS Config monitors resource configuration compliance and tracks changes to infrastructure. While Config can detect misconfigurations and ensure security policies are enforced, it does not scan container images for vulnerabilities. Config is focused on auditing and governance rather than vulnerability scanning, making it unsuitable for image-level security checks.
AWS CloudTrail records API activity across AWS accounts for auditing and compliance. While it provides logs of actions taken on container repositories, it does not analyze container images or detect vulnerabilities. CloudTrail is valuable for tracking who pushed images or modified repositories, but it cannot assess image security.
Amazon ECR image scanning is the correct solution because it integrates directly with container registries, automatically identifies vulnerabilities, provides actionable insights, and supports automated pipelines for pre-deployment security checks. This ensures that production deployments are safe and compliant with security standards. By incorporating ECR image scanning into CI/CD workflows, teams can detect vulnerabilities early, prioritize remediation, and prevent insecure images from reaching production. It simplifies the DevOps workflow by providing built-in security scanning without additional infrastructure or tools, aligning with best practices for DevSecOps and container security.
Question 23
A company wants to reduce operational overhead by automatically patching its EC2 instances while maintaining control over deployment schedules. Which AWS service is best suited to achieve this?
A) AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager
B) AWS Config
C) AWS CloudTrail
D) AWS Lambda
Answer: A) AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager
Explanation:
AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager is a service that automates the process of patching managed instances, including Amazon EC2 and on-premises servers. Patch Manager allows DevOps teams to define patch baselines specifying approved patches, compliance rules, and operational schedules. By configuring maintenance windows, Patch Manager ensures that patches are applied during designated periods, minimizing disruption to production workloads. The service can automatically detect missing patches, download and install them, and provide detailed compliance reports showing which instances are up-to-date and which require attention. Patch Manager also supports different operating systems, including Linux and Windows, ensuring consistent patching practices across heterogeneous environments.
AWS Config monitors resource configurations, tracks changes, and evaluates compliance with defined policies. While Config can detect instances that do not meet specific configuration standards, it does not automate the process of applying patches. Config is focused on auditing and compliance reporting rather than remediation or operational tasks.
AWS CloudTrail records API activity and logs all user and service interactions with AWS resources. While it is valuable for auditing and security monitoring, CloudTrail does not perform patching or automation. It only captures events related to configuration and management actions and cannot maintain operational compliance automatically.
AWS Lambda allows execution of serverless functions in response to triggers or scheduled events. While Lambda could be scripted to perform patching tasks, implementing a complete patch management solution using Lambda would require custom automation, monitoring, and error handling. This adds significant operational complexity and lacks the native patch management capabilities provided by Patch Manager.
Systems Manager Patch Manager is the correct choice because it provides a fully managed, automated solution for patching, minimizes operational overhead, and supports controlled maintenance windows. By using Patch Manager, DevOps teams can maintain system security and compliance without manually managing patch deployment. It provides operational visibility, detailed reporting, and centralized management across instances, reducing the risk of human error. Patch Manager also allows flexibility in scheduling patches according to business needs, ensuring minimal disruption. The integration with IAM ensures secure access control, while the automated detection and remediation of missing patches help maintain consistent compliance standards. By implementing Patch Manager, organizations can streamline security operations, reduce downtime, and ensure that systems are consistently updated with minimal manual intervention.
Question 24
A DevOps team wants to implement real-time monitoring and automated alerting for an application deployed on multiple EC2 instances. The solution must detect high CPU usage and send notifications to the team immediately. Which AWS service combination should be used?
A) Amazon CloudWatch + Amazon SNS
B) AWS CloudTrail + AWS Lambda
C) AWS Config + Amazon S3
D) AWS Systems Manager + AWS CodeDeploy
Answer: A) Amazon CloudWatch + Amazon SNS
Explanation:
Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring service that collects metrics, logs, and events from AWS resources and applications. It can track EC2 instance CPU usage in real time and generate alarms when predefined thresholds are exceeded, such as CPU utilization surpassing 80% for a specified period. CloudWatch alarms can trigger automated actions, including scaling or notifications, providing proactive monitoring and operational visibility. By combining CloudWatch with Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS), notifications are sent immediately to subscribed endpoints, such as email addresses, SMS, or other messaging channels. This ensures that the DevOps team is alerted to high CPU usage promptly, allowing them to respond quickly to potential performance issues.
AWS CloudTrail records API activity and logs interactions with AWS resources. While CloudTrail provides a comprehensive audit trail for security and compliance, it does not monitor real-time performance metrics such as CPU utilization. CloudTrail cannot trigger immediate alerts based on system-level metrics, making it unsuitable for operational monitoring.
AWS Config monitors resource configuration compliance and tracks changes over time. While it is useful for governance and auditing, it does not provide real-time performance metrics or alerting capabilities. Config is focused on detecting deviations from desired configurations rather than operational metrics or performance thresholds, making it inappropriate for monitoring CPU usage.
AWS Systems Manager provides tools for operational management and automation, including Run Command and Automation documents. While it can perform tasks such as patching, software updates, or configuration changes, it does not natively provide real-time metric collection or automated alerting based on CPU usage. Systems Manager can complement monitoring workflows, but it is not designed to replace CloudWatch for performance alerting.
Combining CloudWatch with SNS is the optimal solution because CloudWatch collects real-time performance data, evaluates it against configured thresholds, and generates alarms when conditions are met. SNS delivers immediate notifications to DevOps personnel or incident management systems, enabling rapid response to performance anomalies. This setup ensures proactive monitoring, reduces the risk of service degradation, and maintains operational visibility. The integration is native to AWS, scalable across multiple EC2 instances, and supports a wide range of notification endpoints. By implementing CloudWatch and SNS together, teams can detect high CPU usage, automate alerting, and respond to performance issues efficiently, improving overall application reliability and minimizing downtime.
Question 25
A DevOps team wants to reduce latency for end users by caching frequently requested dynamic content generated by their application running on EC2 instances. Which AWS service should they implement to achieve this?
A) Amazon CloudFront
B) Amazon S3
C) AWS Elastic Load Balancer
D) Amazon API Gateway
Answer: A) Amazon CloudFront
Explanation:
Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that caches both static and dynamic content at edge locations around the world. By serving cached content from locations geographically close to end users, CloudFront significantly reduces latency and improves user experience. It can cache dynamic content using cache behaviors and supports integration with origin servers, such as EC2 instances or load balancers. CloudFront also offers features like Lambda@Edge, which allows lightweight computation at edge locations for content modification, personalization, or header manipulation, providing flexibility for dynamic applications.
Amazon S3 is an object storage service that can host static content but does not provide caching at edge locations. While S3 can store dynamic content generated by applications, it cannot serve content with low latency globally without integrating with a CDN like CloudFront. Using S3 alone would result in higher response times for geographically distributed users because all requests would go directly to the S3 bucket.
AWS Elastic Load Balancer distributes incoming traffic across multiple EC2 instances within a region. While it improves fault tolerance and scaling for applications, it does not provide caching or reduce latency for global users. Load balancers operate at the network and application layers but cannot cache dynamic responses for subsequent requests.
Amazon API Gateway manages API endpoints, throttling, and request routing. While API Gateway can integrate with caching for API responses, it is limited to APIs and does not provide a full CDN solution for general dynamic content. Its caching is regional, unlike CloudFront, which has a global network of edge locations.
Amazon CloudFront is the best solution because it reduces latency for users worldwide, caches frequently accessed content, supports dynamic content caching, integrates with EC2 or load balancers, and provides additional features like SSL termination, geo-restriction, and Lambda@Edge. By offloading repeated requests to edge locations, CloudFront reduces load on the origin servers, improves performance, and enhances scalability. It also supports real-time metrics and logging through CloudWatch and integrates seamlessly with other AWS services. For applications with a global audience or heavy traffic, CloudFront ensures content is delivered quickly and reliably, aligning with best practices for high-performance, low-latency web applications. Implementing CloudFront reduces the number of direct requests to origin servers, minimizes network latency, improves fault tolerance, and provides a secure delivery mechanism with encryption, access control, and DDoS protection via AWS Shield. Overall, CloudFront provides both caching and distribution benefits, making it the standard choice for optimizing content delivery for dynamic and static applications.
Question 26
A DevOps engineer needs to implement centralized authentication for multiple AWS accounts in an organization while allowing employees to use their existing corporate credentials. Which AWS service should be used?
A) AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO)
B) AWS IAM
C) AWS Cognito
D) Amazon CloudFront
Answer: A) AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO)
Explanation:
AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO) enables centralized authentication across multiple AWS accounts and business applications. It integrates with existing corporate identity providers, such as Microsoft Active Directory or SAML-based systems, allowing employees to use their existing credentials to access AWS accounts and cloud applications without creating multiple user accounts. AWS SSO provides permission sets that define access levels for different users, ensuring consistent security policies across accounts. It supports federated access, simplifies account management, and reduces administrative overhead while maintaining compliance and auditability.
AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) provides granular access control within a single AWS account. While IAM allows defining policies, roles, and permissions, it does not provide centralized authentication across multiple accounts using corporate credentials. Managing IAM users for multiple accounts can become cumbersome and error-prone, especially in large organizations.
AWS Cognito is designed for authentication and user management for web and mobile applications. It supports social and enterprise identity providers, but it is intended for application-level authentication rather than centralized access to multiple AWS accounts. Cognito is suitable for customer-facing applications but not for corporate SSO across AWS accounts.
Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network and does not provide authentication or access management capabilities. While CloudFront can secure content delivery using signed URLs or cookies, it is unrelated to centralized authentication or federated identity management.
AWS SSO is the correct solution because it provides centralized identity management, integrates with corporate identity providers, and simplifies access to multiple AWS accounts and applications. It reduces administrative overhead by eliminating the need to create separate IAM users in each account and enforces consistent permission management across the organization. AWS SSO also supports automatic provisioning and deprovisioning of user access, improving security and compliance. By leveraging AWS SSO, organizations can streamline authentication, maintain a unified access model, and provide users with seamless access to multiple AWS accounts while retaining corporate credential control. Additionally, AWS SSO integrates with CloudWatch for monitoring and logging access activity, allowing compliance and audit requirements to be met efficiently. Its ability to federate identity ensures employees do not need to memorize separate AWS credentials, enhancing both security and user convenience. This makes AWS SSO the standard approach for organizations with multiple AWS accounts and centralized authentication requirements.
Question 27
A DevOps team wants to implement continuous deployment for a serverless application built using AWS Lambda and API Gateway. They require automated versioning, deployment stages, and rollback capabilities. Which AWS service should be used?
A) AWS CodeDeploy
B) AWS CodePipeline
C) AWS CloudFormation
D) AWS Config
Answer: A) AWS CodeDeploy
Explanation:
AWS CodeDeploy provides deployment automation for both serverless and traditional applications. For serverless workloads, such as AWS Lambda functions integrated with API Gateway, CodeDeploy supports blue/green deployments, versioning, and automated rollbacks. It allows defining deployment strategies and monitors application health during the rollout. If errors are detected, CodeDeploy can automatically revert to the previous stable version, ensuring minimal downtime. Integration with CloudWatch alarms enables proactive detection of failures, while Lambda versioning allows tracking and managing deployed code versions effectively.
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) service that automates the build, test, and deployment process. While CodePipeline orchestrates deployment workflows, it does not inherently manage Lambda versions or provide deployment strategies such as blue/green or canary deployments. Instead, CodePipeline integrates with CodeDeploy to execute the actual deployment and rollback processes. Without CodeDeploy, CodePipeline alone cannot handle serverless deployment versioning and automated rollback.
AWS CloudFormation enables infrastructure as code, allowing teams to provision AWS resources declaratively. While it can define Lambda functions and API Gateway stages, CloudFormation alone does not provide automated deployment strategies, health monitoring, or rollback mechanisms for application code. Updates via CloudFormation require stack changes, and errors during updates may necessitate manual intervention for rollback.
AWS Config monitors resource configurations and evaluates compliance with defined rules. While it is valuable for governance and auditing, Config does not handle application deployment, versioning, or rollback. It cannot orchestrate serverless deployment workflows or respond to application-level health checks.
AWS CodeDeploy is the optimal choice because it provides native support for serverless deployments, automated versioning, stage-based rollouts, health monitoring, and rollback capabilities. It integrates with Lambda and API Gateway seamlessly, allowing DevOps teams to deploy new application versions safely and efficiently. CodeDeploy minimizes downtime, reduces deployment risk, and ensures consistency across environments. By defining deployment strategies and monitoring deployment health, teams can respond to errors automatically, maintain service reliability, and improve operational efficiency. It supports both in-place and blue/green deployment strategies, enabling teams to test new versions before fully switching production traffic. CodeDeploy also provides detailed logging and audit trails for each deployment, helping teams track changes, investigate issues, and maintain compliance. Its integration with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch and CodePipeline, further enhances automation and observability, making it the standard solution for continuous deployment of serverless applications.
Question 28
A DevOps engineer needs to implement secure, temporary access to AWS resources for developers without creating long-term IAM users. The solution must integrate with the existing corporate identity provider. Which AWS service should be used?
A) AWS Security Token Service (STS)
B) AWS IAM
C) AWS Cognito
D) AWS Secrets Manager
Answer: A) AWS Security Token Service (STS)
Explanation:
AWS Security Token Service (STS) provides temporary, limited-privilege credentials for IAM users or federated users. This service is ideal for granting developers temporary access to AWS resources without creating long-term IAM users, reducing the risk of credential leakage or misuse. STS integrates with corporate identity providers through SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect, enabling single sign-on (SSO) workflows. Developers authenticate with the corporate identity system and receive temporary credentials from STS, which can include roles with specific permissions for defined durations. This approach ensures that credentials automatically expire, enhancing security and operational efficiency.
IAM alone is responsible for creating users, groups, and roles with specific permissions. While IAM provides fine-grained access control, creating individual IAM users for each developer increases administrative overhead and risk associated with managing long-lived credentials. IAM does not inherently provide temporary access or federation without integrating STS, making it less suitable for ephemeral access requirements.
AWS Cognito is primarily designed for user authentication in web and mobile applications. While it can manage user pools and federate identities for application access, it is not intended for providing temporary credentials to access AWS resources. Cognito does not replace the functionality of STS for granting limited AWS permissions in enterprise environments.
AWS Secrets Manager manages sensitive information such as API keys, passwords, and database credentials. It can rotate secrets automatically but does not provide temporary IAM credentials or federated access. Secrets Manager is not designed for dynamic, time-limited access to AWS services.
STS is the correct solution because it provides temporary credentials that expire automatically, integrates with corporate identity providers, and supports role assumption for defined permissions. It eliminates the need for long-lived credentials, reduces administrative overhead, and strengthens security by ensuring credentials are short-lived. By leveraging STS, DevOps teams can implement least-privilege access models, comply with security policies, and maintain a streamlined workflow for developers who need temporary access to resources for testing, debugging, or deployment. STS supports programmatic and CLI access, integrates with CloudTrail for auditing, and allows detailed permission scoping through IAM roles. Using STS reduces risk associated with credential compromise, facilitates federation, and aligns with AWS best practices for secure and scalable identity management in multi-account environments. It also allows automation of temporary access for CI/CD pipelines or administrative tasks without creating permanent IAM users, ensuring operational agility while maintaining strong security posture.
Question 29
A DevOps team wants to automate infrastructure provisioning for multiple environments (development, staging, production) while maintaining consistency and version control. Which AWS service is most suitable for this requirement?
A) AWS CloudFormation
B) AWS CodeDeploy
C) AWS Config
D) AWS Systems Manager
Answer: A) AWS CloudFormation
Explanation:
AWS CloudFormation is an infrastructure as code (IaC) service that allows DevOps teams to define, provision, and manage AWS resources in a declarative and version-controlled manner. Templates written in JSON or YAML describe the desired state of resources, including EC2 instances, VPCs, RDS databases, security groups, and more. Using CloudFormation ensures that all environments are consistent, reduces human errors in manual provisioning, and allows the infrastructure to be version-controlled alongside application code. Changes to infrastructure are tracked through templates, enabling rollbacks to previous versions if needed. CloudFormation also supports parameterization, conditions, and nested stacks, making it suitable for managing multiple environments with varying configurations while maintaining a single source of truth.
AWS CodeDeploy automates application deployments to EC2 instances, Lambda functions, or on-premises servers. While it provides deployment strategies and rollback capabilities for application code, it does not manage infrastructure provisioning. CodeDeploy cannot enforce consistent environment configurations or version control for AWS resources, making it insufficient for the requirement of provisioning multiple environments.
AWS Config continuously monitors resource configurations and evaluates compliance with defined rules. While it is excellent for auditing and governance, Config does not provision resources. It observes changes to existing resources and alerts on non-compliance but does not create or manage infrastructure automatically, limiting its applicability for multi-environment provisioning.
AWS Systems Manager provides operational management capabilities, such as patching, configuration automation, and Run Command execution. While it can automate administrative tasks on instances, it is not designed to declare and version infrastructure as a whole. Systems Manager complements CloudFormation but cannot replace it for managing infrastructure across environments consistently.
CloudFormation is the optimal choice because it enables consistent, repeatable, and version-controlled infrastructure provisioning. By defining templates, teams can automate environment creation, replicate infrastructure across development, staging, and production, and maintain a single source of truth. It supports change sets to preview updates before deployment, reducing risk. Integration with CI/CD pipelines allows seamless provisioning as part of application deployment workflows, improving efficiency and reliability. CloudFormation also allows automation of environment scaling, networking, and security configurations, ensuring that all environments are compliant with organizational policies. Versioning templates alongside application code ensures traceability and reproducibility, making CloudFormation essential for maintaining operational consistency across multiple AWS environments.
Question 30
A company wants to ensure that sensitive environment variables used in Lambda functions are stored securely, can be versioned, and rotated without redeploying code. Which AWS service is best suited for this requirement?
A) AWS Secrets Manager
B) AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store
C) AWS Config
D) Amazon S3
Answer: A) AWS Secrets Manager
Explanation:
AWS Secrets Manager is a service designed for securely storing, retrieving, and rotating secrets, including database credentials, API keys, and sensitive configuration values. For Lambda functions, Secrets Manager allows environment variables containing sensitive data to be stored as secrets, which can be referenced programmatically at runtime. Secrets can be versioned, ensuring that multiple versions are maintained, and automatic rotation can be configured to update secrets at regular intervals without redeploying the Lambda function. This ensures that credentials remain secure and up-to-date while minimizing operational overhead. Secrets Manager integrates with IAM for fine-grained access control, allowing only authorized functions or users to access secrets. It also integrates with CloudWatch for auditing and monitoring access patterns.
AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store also supports storing configuration values, including secure strings encrypted with KMS. While Parameter Store provides basic secret storage, it does not natively support automatic rotation. Updating parameters in Parameter Store often requires redeploying Lambda functions to fetch new values unless custom automation is implemented. Versioning is supported, but operational complexity increases for automated rotation scenarios compared to Secrets Manager.
AWS Config monitors resource configurations and evaluates compliance with defined rules. While it is useful for governance and auditing, it does not manage secrets or provide secure storage, versioning, or automatic rotation capabilities. Config is focused on compliance monitoring rather than secret management.
Amazon S3 can store encrypted objects, including sensitive files or configuration values. However, S3 is a general-purpose storage service and does not provide built-in secret rotation, versioning for sensitive secrets, or native integration with Lambda for secret injection. Using S3 for secrets requires custom coding, key management, and access controls, which introduces operational overhead and potential security risks.
Secrets Manager is the correct choice because it securely stores sensitive data, supports automatic rotation, provides version control, integrates seamlessly with Lambda, and reduces the need for manual intervention. By using Secrets Manager, DevOps teams can follow security best practices, maintain the integrity of sensitive environment variables, and ensure compliance with organizational policies. Automatic rotation prevents credential exposure over time, and versioning allows tracking of historical changes. Integration with IAM ensures only authorized Lambda functions access secrets, and audit logs via CloudWatch provide traceability for access and rotation events. Using Secrets Manager improves operational efficiency, reduces security risks, and provides a reliable mechanism for managing sensitive configuration data in serverless environments, making it the recommended approach for secure, scalable, and compliant secret management.