ServiceNow CIS-CSM Certified Implementation Specialist — Customer Service Management Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q61-75 - Certbolt

Visit here for our full ServiceNow CIS-CSM exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61 :

A CSM manager notices that certain high-volume issues are repeatedly generating new cases, resulting in increased workload and SLA breaches. Which approach is most effective to reduce recurrence and improve case handling efficiency?

A) Handle each case individually without addressing systemic causes
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals
C) Randomly assign duplicate cases to available agents
D) Allow agents to manage duplicates manually without a structured process

Answer:
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Knowledge Management with linked articles and self-service portals, is the most effective solution for reducing recurring case submissions and improving operational efficiency. ServiceNow Knowledge Management allows organizations to create structured content addressing frequently reported issues, including detailed resolution steps, preventive measures, and troubleshooting instructions. Integrating these knowledge articles into self-service portals empowers customers to independently find solutions before submitting new cases, reducing case volume, SLA pressure, and agent workload. By linking knowledge articles to case creation, agents are guided to provide consistent, accurate resolutions, enhancing efficiency and maintaining quality standards. Feedback mechanisms within Knowledge Management ensure that content remains up-to-date, relevant, and effective, contributing to continuous improvement and a reduction in recurring cases.

Option A, handling each case individually without addressing systemic causes, is reactive and inefficient. Repeatedly addressing the same issues increases operational costs, prolongs resolution times, and fails to reduce recurring cases. Customers may experience frustration due to repeated submissions and inconsistent guidance, negatively impacting trust, satisfaction, and overall service perception.

Option C, randomly assigning duplicate cases to agents, does not address the root causes of recurring issues. Random allocation may temporarily distribute workload but does not provide a systematic solution, leading to inefficiencies, inconsistent resolution approaches, SLA breaches, and continued customer dissatisfaction.

Option D, allowing agents to manage duplicates manually without structured processes, is error-prone and inconsistent. Manual management lacks scalability, increases the likelihood of missed duplicates, and fails to provide long-term resolution strategies. Knowledge Management offers a structured, scalable solution that reduces repetitive cases, improves SLA compliance, and enhances customer satisfaction.

By implementing Knowledge Management and self-service portals, the CSM manager ensures a proactive, structured, and sustainable approach to recurring issues, reducing workload, improving SLA compliance, and providing a superior customer experience in alignment with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 62 :

A CSM administrator wants to monitor the effectiveness of case resolution, agent productivity, recurring issues, and customer satisfaction to identify areas for process improvement. Which approach is most effective?

A) Rely solely on anecdotal feedback from agents
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics
C) Conduct sporadic meetings without structured metrics
D) Track only case closure counts without evaluating quality or timeliness

Answer:
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics

Explanation:

Option B, utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and customer satisfaction metrics, provides the most comprehensive, actionable insights for evaluating operational performance and driving continuous improvement. Performance Analytics allows managers to track quantitative indicators such as case resolution times, SLA compliance, agent productivity, workload distribution, and recurring issues. Trend analysis highlights patterns and systemic issues, enabling proactive interventions and process optimization. Customer satisfaction metrics complement quantitative data by providing qualitative insight, helping organizations understand service quality from the customer perspective.

Dashboards provide real-time visualization, allowing managers to detect bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation, and implement corrective measures before SLA breaches occur. This data-driven approach improves operational efficiency, reduces delays, and enhances overall customer satisfaction. Additionally, the combination of metrics supports evidence-based decision-making, enabling managers to identify training needs, resource gaps, and process inefficiencies for continuous improvement initiatives.

Option A, relying solely on anecdotal feedback from agents, is subjective and inconsistent. Individual perceptions may misrepresent actual workload, recurring issues, and SLA performance. Without structured data, managers cannot reliably identify gaps or implement effective process improvements, limiting operational effectiveness and customer satisfaction.

Option C, conducting sporadic meetings without structured metrics, provides limited insight. While meetings may offer context, they do not provide real-time visibility into trends, SLA compliance, or agent productivity. Managers may overlook emerging issues or fail to optimize processes without consistent, data-driven measurement, resulting in inefficiencies and SLA violations.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides an incomplete view of performance. High closure numbers do not necessarily reflect timely resolution, quality service, SLA adherence, or customer satisfaction. Without comprehensive metrics, managers cannot accurately assess operational performance or identify opportunities for improvement.

By utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and customer satisfaction metrics, the CSM administrator gains a complete, actionable understanding of operations, enabling proactive management, continuous improvement, and enhanced customer satisfaction in alignment with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 63 :

A CSM manager wants to improve cross-department collaboration on complex cases while ensuring accountability, timely resolution, and SLA compliance. Which configuration is most effective?

A) Assign cases to a single department and ignore cross-department dependencies
B) Enable Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking
C) Allow agents to manage multi-department tasks independently without coordination
D) Escalate cases to management only after delays occur

Answer:
B) Enable Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking

Explanation:

Option B, enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, is the most effective approach for managing complex, multi-department cases efficiently while maintaining accountability, SLA compliance, and timely resolution. ServiceNow Case Teams allow administrators to define specific roles such as case owner, subject matter expert, reviewer, or approver, ensuring each task has clear accountability. Task tracking ensures that each responsibility is completed on time, preventing bottlenecks and SLA breaches. Activity streams, notifications, and shared notes facilitate communication and coordination across departments, ensuring dependencies are managed effectively. This configuration enhances operational efficiency, supports proactive management, and improves customer satisfaction.

Option A, assigning cases to a single department, is inadequate for complex scenarios. Critical tasks may be overlooked, multi-department dependencies remain unmanaged, and resolution may be delayed, negatively impacting customer experience and SLA compliance.

Option C, allowing agents to manage tasks independently without coordination, increases inefficiency, duplication of effort, and errors. SLA compliance is compromised, and customer satisfaction suffers due to delays and inconsistent handling.

Option D, escalating cases only after delays occur, is reactive and ineffective. Waiting for escalation after problems arise increases SLA breach risk, operational inefficiency, and customer dissatisfaction. Proactive coordination through Case Teams ensures timely, accountable, and efficient handling of complex cases.

By enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, the CSM manager ensures collaboration, accountability, SLA adherence, and timely resolution, aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for multi-department case management.

Question 64 :

A CSM administrator wants to reduce repetitive case submissions, improve customer self-service capabilities, and ensure consistent resolutions. Which strategy is most effective?

A) Resolve repetitive cases individually without addressing underlying issues
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals
C) Assign duplicate cases randomly to agents without tracking
D) Redirect duplicates manually without structured guidance

Answer:
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Knowledge Management with linked articles and self-service portals, is the most effective strategy for reducing repetitive case submissions, empowering customers, and ensuring consistent resolutions. Knowledge Management enables organizations to create structured, searchable content addressing common issues, including troubleshooting steps, preventive instructions, and detailed resolution guidance. Integrating knowledge articles into self-service portals allows customers to independently resolve issues, reducing the number of incoming cases, minimizing agent workload, and supporting SLA compliance. Linking knowledge articles to case creation guides agents in providing consistent, accurate resolutions, enhancing operational efficiency and service quality.

Feedback mechanisms within Knowledge Management enable continuous improvement of content, ensuring articles remain relevant, comprehensive, and effective over time. Over time, this approach reduces recurring cases, improves SLA adherence, and enhances customer satisfaction by providing immediate access to actionable solutions.

Option A, resolving repetitive cases individually without addressing root causes, is inefficient and reactive. Handling each case separately increases workload, prolongs resolution, and fails to address underlying issues, resulting in repeated submissions and customer frustration.

Option C, randomly assigning duplicates to agents, does not prevent recurrence or address systemic issues. Random assignment may temporarily distribute workload but does not improve efficiency or resolution consistency, leading to SLA breaches and customer dissatisfaction.

Option D, manually redirecting duplicates without structured guidance, is error-prone, inconsistent, and unsustainable. Manual intervention lacks scalability, increasing the likelihood of missed duplicates and unresolved recurring issues. Knowledge Management provides a structured, scalable, and proactive solution.

By implementing Knowledge Management and self-service portals, the administrator reduces repetitive case submissions, empowers customers, ensures consistent resolutions, and enhances SLA compliance and customer satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 65 :

A CSM manager wants to ensure proactive communication, timely resolution, and continuous improvement across all cases to maximize customer satisfaction. Which integrated approach is most effective?

A) Allow agents to manage cases independently without structured updates or accountability
B) Implement a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics
C) Escalate cases only after SLA breaches occur
D) Track only case closure counts without evaluating recurring issues or SLA compliance

Answer:
B) Implement a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics

Explanation:

Option B, implementing a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics, is the most effective integrated approach to ensure proactive communication, timely resolution, and continuous operational improvement while maximizing customer satisfaction. Case Teams provide clear accountability, role-based task assignments, and collaboration for complex, multi-department cases, preventing bottlenecks and SLA breaches. Knowledge Management reduces repetitive case submissions and empowers customers with self-service solutions while ensuring consistent and accurate resolutions by agents. Performance Analytics provides actionable insights into SLA compliance, recurring issues, agent performance, and customer satisfaction, enabling data-driven improvements and proactive interventions.

Option A, allowing agents to manage cases independently, is reactive and inefficient. Without structured updates, accountability, or coordination, SLA compliance suffers, recurring issues persist, and customer satisfaction declines.

Option C, escalating cases only after SLA breaches, is reactive and does not prevent delays or operational inefficiencies. This approach increases the risk of customer dissatisfaction and operational strain.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides an incomplete and misleading perspective. Closure numbers alone do not reflect SLA adherence, resolution quality, recurring issues, or customer satisfaction, preventing accurate assessment and improvement.

By implementing Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics together, the CSM manager ensures structured collaboration, proactive communication, reduced recurrence, data-driven operational improvements, SLA compliance, and enhanced customer satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 66 :

A CSM manager wants to improve the handling of complex, multi-department cases while reducing SLA breaches and maintaining visibility for executives. Which solution is most effective?

A) Assign cases to individual agents without cross-department coordination
B) Implement Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking
C) Escalate cases only after delays occur
D) Track cases solely by closure counts without monitoring SLA compliance

Answer:
B) Implement Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, is the most effective approach to handle complex multi-department cases efficiently while reducing SLA breaches and maintaining visibility for executives. Case Teams allow administrators to define roles such as case owner, subject matter expert, reviewer, or approver, ensuring accountability for each task. Task tracking ensures completion of responsibilities on time, preventing bottlenecks and SLA violations. Activity streams, notifications, and shared notes facilitate collaboration and communication across departments, ensuring that dependencies are properly managed. By implementing Case Teams, management gains real-time visibility into case progress, resource allocation, and potential delays, allowing proactive interventions. This approach supports operational efficiency, SLA compliance, and superior customer satisfaction by coordinating efforts across multiple stakeholders.

Option A, assigning cases to individual agents without cross-department coordination, is inefficient for complex cases. Tasks requiring input from multiple departments may be delayed or overlooked, increasing the risk of SLA breaches and negatively affecting customer satisfaction. Without a structured approach, accountability is unclear, and operational performance is difficult to monitor.

Option C, escalating cases only after delays, is reactive and insufficient. Waiting for SLA breaches or delays to escalate issues does not prevent negative outcomes, and customer satisfaction is adversely affected due to prolonged resolution times. Proactive management through Case Teams ensures that problems are addressed before escalation becomes necessary.

Option D, tracking cases solely by closure counts, provides an incomplete picture of performance. Closure numbers do not reflect SLA compliance, resolution quality, or cross-departmental collaboration, limiting the manager’s ability to implement meaningful improvements.

By implementing Case Teams with defined roles and task tracking, the manager ensures structured collaboration, proactive issue management, SLA compliance, and high operational transparency, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for multi-department case management.

Question 67 :

A CSM administrator wants to reduce recurring cases for frequently reported issues while improving customer self-service adoption. Which approach is most effective?

A) Resolve each case individually without addressing root causes
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals
C) Assign duplicate cases randomly to available agents
D) Redirect duplicates manually without standardized processes

Answer:
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Knowledge Management with linked articles and self-service portals, is the most effective strategy for reducing recurring case submissions and increasing self-service adoption. Knowledge Management allows organizations to develop structured, searchable content addressing frequently reported issues. Articles can include detailed troubleshooting instructions, step-by-step resolutions, and preventive measures. When integrated with self-service portals, customers can resolve issues independently without submitting new cases, decreasing the overall workload on agents and reducing SLA breaches. Linking knowledge articles to case creation ensures agents consistently provide accurate solutions, improving operational efficiency and service quality.

Customer feedback on knowledge articles facilitates continuous improvement, keeping content relevant and effective over time. Reducing recurring cases through proactive knowledge management not only improves operational efficiency but also enhances customer satisfaction by providing immediate access to actionable solutions.

Option A, resolving each case individually without addressing root causes, is reactive and inefficient. Addressing cases one by one increases agent workload, extends resolution times, and fails to prevent recurrence. Customers experience frustration due to repeated issues, which can decrease trust and satisfaction.

Option C, assigning duplicates randomly to agents, does not address systemic issues and may temporarily redistribute workload without improving efficiency or resolution consistency. SLA compliance remains at risk, and customer satisfaction may decline.

Option D, manually redirecting duplicates without standardized processes, is inconsistent, error-prone, and unsustainable. Manual processes do not scale effectively, increasing the risk of missed cases or inconsistent resolution approaches. Knowledge Management provides a structured, scalable solution that reduces recurrence, ensures consistent service delivery, and enhances customer experience.

By implementing Knowledge Management and self-service portals, the CSM administrator reduces recurring case volume, empowers customers, ensures consistent resolutions, and enhances SLA compliance and overall satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 68 :

A CSM manager wants to monitor agent performance, SLA adherence, recurring issues, and customer satisfaction to identify improvement opportunities. Which approach is most comprehensive?

A) Rely solely on agent feedback and anecdotal input
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics
C) Conduct occasional meetings without structured performance metrics
D) Track only case closure counts without evaluating quality or timeliness

Answer:
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics

Explanation:

Option B, utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics, provides the most comprehensive insight into operational performance and areas for improvement. Performance Analytics allows managers to monitor quantitative metrics such as case resolution times, SLA compliance, workload distribution, recurring issues, and agent productivity. Trend analysis enables the identification of patterns in recurring issues, bottlenecks, and inefficiencies, which allows proactive measures to prevent future SLA breaches and improve operational processes. Customer satisfaction metrics complement quantitative data by providing qualitative insights that reveal the service quality from the customer’s perspective.

Dashboards provide real-time visibility, enabling managers to intervene proactively, allocate resources efficiently, and implement corrective actions before SLA violations occur. This data-driven approach ensures continuous improvement by identifying systemic issues, training needs, and opportunities for process optimization. Integrating Performance Analytics with operational oversight also enhances transparency for executives and stakeholders, demonstrating compliance with SLAs and overall service performance.

Option A, relying solely on agent feedback, is subjective and inconsistent. Individual perceptions may misrepresent workload, recurring issues, and SLA adherence, limiting the manager’s ability to make informed decisions and implement meaningful improvements.

Option C, conducting occasional meetings without structured metrics, is insufficient for proactive management. While meetings can provide context, they lack the real-time data required to track trends, SLA compliance, and performance accurately. Without structured metrics, managers may miss emerging issues and fail to optimize processes, resulting in inefficiencies and SLA breaches.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides a limited perspective. Closure numbers do not indicate timeliness, quality, recurring issues, or customer satisfaction, making it difficult to evaluate true operational performance or implement process improvements.

By utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and customer satisfaction metrics, the CSM manager gains a complete, actionable understanding of operations, enabling proactive management, continuous improvement, and enhanced customer experience in alignment with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 69 :

A CSM administrator wants to improve collaboration across departments for complex cases, ensure accountability, and reduce SLA breaches. Which solution is most effective?

Answer:
B) Enable Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking

Explanation:

Option B, enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, is the most effective solution for managing complex, multi-department cases while maintaining accountability, SLA compliance, and timely resolution. Case Teams allow administrators to define specific roles for each task, ensuring ownership and accountability. Task tracking guarantees that responsibilities are completed on schedule, preventing bottlenecks and SLA violations. Collaborative tools such as shared notes, notifications, and activity streams facilitate communication across departments, ensuring all dependencies are addressed and the case progresses efficiently. This approach also provides visibility to management and stakeholders, allowing proactive interventions to resolve bottlenecks before they impact SLA compliance or customer satisfaction.

Option A, assigning cases to a single department, is inadequate for complex cases. Critical tasks requiring input from multiple departments may be delayed or overlooked, increasing SLA breaches and negatively affecting customer experience.

Option C, allowing agents to manage multi-department tasks independently, increases inefficiencies, duplication of work, and the risk of errors. SLA compliance is at risk, and customer satisfaction may decline due to inconsistent handling and delays.

Option D, escalating cases only after delays occur, is reactive. Waiting for escalation after SLA violations or bottlenecks has already occurred does not prevent delays or operational inefficiency. Proactive management through Case Teams ensures timely, accountable, and efficient handling of complex cases.

By enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, the CSM administrator ensures structured collaboration, accountability, SLA compliance, and timely resolution, aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for multi-department case management.

Question 70 :

A CSM manager wants to enhance customer satisfaction by ensuring proactive communication, timely resolution, and efficient handling of recurring issues. Which integrated approach is most effective?

A) Allow agents to manage cases independently without structured updates
B) Implement a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics
C) Escalate cases only after SLA breaches occur
D) Track only case closure counts without analyzing recurring issues or SLA compliance

Answer:
B) Implement a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics together, is the most effective integrated strategy to ensure proactive communication, timely resolution, and continuous improvement while enhancing customer satisfaction. Case Teams provide clear accountability and role-based task management for complex cases, ensuring collaboration across multiple departments. Knowledge Management reduces repetitive case submissions by providing structured content and empowering customers to use self-service portals, ensuring consistent and efficient resolution. Performance Analytics offers actionable insights into SLA compliance, agent performance, recurring issues, and customer satisfaction, enabling data-driven interventions and continuous improvement.

Option A, allowing agents to manage cases independently, is reactive and inefficient. Without structured updates, accountability, or proactive monitoring, SLA compliance is compromised, recurring issues persist, and customer satisfaction declines.

Option C, escalating cases only after SLA breaches, is reactive and insufficient. Waiting for escalation increases SLA violations, operational inefficiencies, and customer dissatisfaction. Proactive management ensures problems are resolved before escalation is required.

Option D, tracking only case closures, is misleading. Closure counts alone do not reflect SLA adherence, resolution quality, recurring issues, or customer satisfaction, limiting insight and improvement opportunities.

By combining Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics, the CSM manager ensures structured collaboration, proactive communication, reduced recurrence, data-driven operational improvements, SLA compliance, and enhanced customer satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 71 :

A CSM manager notices that several recurring issues are generating multiple cases per week, causing agent workload to spike and SLA breaches to increase. Which approach is most effective in addressing this challenge while improving customer experience?

A) Continue handling each case individually without addressing systemic causes
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals
C) Randomly assign duplicate cases to available agents
D) Redirect duplicate cases manually without standardized processes

Answer:
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Knowledge Management with linked articles and self-service portals, is the most effective approach for reducing recurring case submissions while improving customer experience. Knowledge Management allows organizations to create structured, searchable content that addresses frequently reported issues, providing step-by-step instructions, preventive guidance, and best practices for resolution. Integrating this content into self-service portals empowers customers to find solutions independently before submitting new cases, reducing workload on agents, preventing SLA breaches, and improving efficiency. Linking knowledge articles to case creation ensures that agents consistently provide accurate guidance, further improving resolution efficiency and quality.

Option A, continuing to handle each case individually without addressing systemic causes, is reactive and inefficient. Repeatedly addressing the same issues increases workload, delays resolution, and fails to prevent recurrence. Customers experience repeated interactions for the same issues, which diminishes satisfaction and reduces confidence in support services.

Option C, randomly assigning duplicate cases to available agents, does not resolve recurring issues or improve operational efficiency. Random allocation may temporarily distribute workload, but underlying problems remain unaddressed, causing repeated SLA breaches and inconsistent resolutions.

Option D, redirecting duplicate cases manually without standardized processes, is time-consuming, inconsistent, and unsustainable. Manual handling increases the risk of missed duplicates and inconsistent outcomes. Knowledge Management provides a scalable, structured, and proactive solution to recurring issues while empowering customers and reducing agent workload.

By implementing Knowledge Management and self-service portals, the CSM manager can proactively reduce recurring cases, improve SLA compliance, enhance operational efficiency, and significantly boost customer satisfaction, aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for recurring issue management.

Question 72 :

A CSM administrator wants to monitor SLA compliance, recurring issues, agent performance, and customer satisfaction to identify opportunities for process improvement. Which approach is most effective?

A) Rely solely on agent anecdotal feedback
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics
C) Conduct occasional meetings without structured metrics
D) Track only case closure counts without analyzing quality or timeliness

Answer:
B) Utilize Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics

Explanation:

Option B, utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and customer satisfaction metrics, is the most comprehensive approach to monitor performance and drive continuous improvement. Performance Analytics enables tracking quantitative metrics such as case resolution times, SLA adherence, agent workload, recurring issues, and case volume trends. Trend analysis allows identification of patterns, such as frequently recurring issues, bottlenecks, or areas requiring additional training. Customer satisfaction metrics complement quantitative data by providing qualitative insight into the service experience, helping managers understand the impact of operational processes on customers.

Dashboards provide real-time visibility into performance, allowing proactive interventions before SLA breaches occur. Managers can identify bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation, and implement process improvements based on actionable insights. Combining quantitative and qualitative data ensures a holistic view of operations, supporting continuous improvement initiatives, operational efficiency, and enhanced customer satisfaction.

Option A, relying solely on agent anecdotal feedback, is subjective and inconsistent. Individual perspectives may misrepresent actual workload, recurring issues, or SLA compliance. Decisions based solely on anecdotal evidence can lead to operational inefficiencies and missed improvement opportunities.

Option C, conducting occasional meetings without structured metrics, offers limited insight. Meetings provide context but lack real-time visibility and systematic trend analysis, limiting the ability to proactively manage workloads, SLA adherence, and recurring issues.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides an incomplete view of performance. Closure numbers do not reflect timeliness, quality, SLA adherence, or recurring issues. Without comprehensive metrics, managers cannot accurately assess performance or implement effective improvement measures.

By utilizing Performance Analytics dashboards with SLA tracking, trend analysis, and satisfaction metrics, the CSM administrator gains actionable insights to drive continuous operational improvement, maintain SLA compliance, and improve overall customer satisfaction, aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for performance monitoring.

Question 73 :

A CSM manager wants to ensure timely resolution of complex, multi-department cases while maintaining accountability and reducing SLA breaches. Which configuration is most effective?

Answer:
B) Enable Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking

Explanation:

Option B, enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, is the most effective approach to manage complex, multi-department cases. Case Teams allow administrators to assign specific roles such as case owner, subject matter expert, reviewer, or approver, ensuring clear accountability for each task. Task tracking enables monitoring of completion status and adherence to deadlines, preventing SLA breaches. Communication tools such as activity streams, notifications, and shared notes facilitate collaboration across departments, ensuring all dependencies are properly managed. By providing transparency and coordination, Case Teams allow management to intervene proactively when bottlenecks or delays are identified, improving operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Option A, assigning cases to a single department, is inadequate for complex scenarios. Tasks requiring input from multiple departments may be delayed or neglected, increasing SLA breach risk and negatively impacting customer satisfaction.

Option C, allowing agents to manage multi-department tasks independently, leads to inefficiencies, duplication of effort, and inconsistent results. SLA compliance is compromised, and customers may experience delays or inconsistent resolutions.

Option D, escalating cases only after delays occur, is reactive and insufficient. Waiting for SLA violations before acting allows problems to accumulate, reduces operational efficiency, and negatively affects the customer experience.

By enabling Case Teams with defined roles, responsibilities, and task tracking, the CSM manager ensures collaboration, accountability, SLA adherence, and timely resolution, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices for managing multi-department cases.

Question 74 :

A CSM administrator wants to reduce repetitive case submissions, improve customer self-service, and ensure consistent resolutions across the support organization. Which strategy is most effective?

Answer:
B) Implement Knowledge Management with articles linked to recurring issues and integrate self-service portals

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Knowledge Management with linked articles and self-service portals, is the most effective strategy for reducing repetitive case submissions, empowering customers, and maintaining consistent resolutions. Knowledge Management allows creation of structured, searchable content addressing frequently reported issues, including troubleshooting steps, preventive instructions, and detailed resolutions. Integrating this content into self-service portals enables customers to find solutions independently, decreasing case volume, reducing agent workload, and ensuring SLA compliance. Linking knowledge articles to case creation provides agents with guidance for consistent resolution, improving efficiency and service quality.

Feedback mechanisms within Knowledge Management ensure that content remains relevant and effective over time, continuously improving self-service capabilities. Reducing repetitive cases through Knowledge Management increases operational efficiency, improves SLA adherence, and enhances customer satisfaction by providing immediate access to actionable solutions.

Option A, resolving repetitive cases individually, is reactive and inefficient. Addressing each case separately increases workload, delays resolution, and fails to prevent recurrence. Customers may experience repeated issues, reducing satisfaction and trust.

Option C, assigning duplicate cases randomly, does not address underlying issues and may temporarily redistribute workload but does not prevent recurrence or improve consistency. SLA compliance and customer satisfaction remain at risk.

Option D, manually redirecting duplicates without structured guidance, is error-prone and unsustainable. Manual processes lack scalability, increasing the likelihood of missed duplicates and inconsistent resolutions.

By implementing Knowledge Management and self-service portals, the CSM administrator reduces repetitive case submissions, empowers customers, ensures consistent resolutions, and enhances SLA compliance and overall satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Question 75 :

A CSM manager wants to improve overall customer satisfaction by ensuring proactive communication, timely resolution, and efficient handling of recurring issues. Which integrated approach is most effective?

Answer:
B) Implement a combination of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics

Explanation:

Option B, implementing Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics together, is the most effective integrated approach for ensuring proactive communication, timely resolution, and continuous improvement while enhancing customer satisfaction. Case Teams provide clear accountability and collaboration for multi-department cases, ensuring timely resolution and SLA compliance. Knowledge Management reduces repetitive case submissions and empowers customers to utilize self-service portals, ensuring consistent and efficient resolution. Performance Analytics provides actionable insights into SLA compliance, recurring issues, agent performance, and customer satisfaction, enabling data-driven decision-making and proactive process improvement.

Option A, allowing agents to manage cases independently, is reactive and inefficient. Without structured updates or accountability, SLA compliance may be compromised, recurring issues persist, and customer satisfaction declines.

Option C, escalating cases only after SLA breaches, is reactive. Waiting until SLA breaches occur delays resolution, reduces operational efficiency, and negatively impacts customer satisfaction.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides an incomplete perspective. Closure numbers alone do not reflect SLA adherence, resolution quality, recurring issues, or customer satisfaction, limiting insights and process improvement opportunities.

By combining Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics, the CSM manager ensures structured collaboration, proactive communication, reduced recurrence, data-driven improvements, SLA compliance, and enhanced customer satisfaction, fully aligning with ServiceNow CSM best practices.

Option B represents the most comprehensive and strategically sound approach to customer service management. By leveraging the combined capabilities of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics, organizations can achieve structured collaboration, proactive resolution, and continuous operational improvement, all of which contribute directly to enhanced customer satisfaction.

Case Teams: Case Teams create a clearly defined framework for collaboration, ensuring that complex cases involving multiple departments are addressed efficiently. In many organizations, cases often involve several stakeholders such as technical support, billing, and account management. Without a structured team approach, individual agents may work in silos, leading to fragmented communication, duplicated efforts, and delayed resolution. Case Teams clarify accountability by assigning roles such as primary owner, contributor, or subject matter expert, ensuring that each team member understands their responsibilities and deadlines. This clarity reduces ambiguity, prevents bottlenecks, and improves SLA adherence, as tasks are monitored systematically and handoffs are managed effectively. Additionally, Case Teams foster collaboration and knowledge sharing within the organization. Agents can consult colleagues with specialized expertise, which reduces errors and ensures that solutions are accurate and consistent. This collaborative approach enhances customer trust and satisfaction because issues are resolved thoroughly and efficiently.

Knowledge Management: Knowledge Management serves as a central repository of documented solutions, enabling agents and customers to access relevant information quickly. Repetitive cases are a common challenge in customer service, and a well-maintained knowledge base can drastically reduce their occurrence. By providing self-service options through customer portals, organizations empower customers to resolve issues independently, which reduces response times and enhances the overall experience. Agents also benefit from a structured knowledge base, as it ensures consistent responses to recurring problems and provides access to proven solutions. This consistency is critical in building customer confidence and maintaining service quality. Moreover, Knowledge Management allows for continuous improvement. By analyzing which articles are most frequently accessed, managers can identify common challenges and update content to address emerging issues. This dynamic approach ensures that both agents and customers always have access to accurate, relevant, and up-to-date information, which supports efficiency and satisfaction simultaneously.

Performance Analytics: Performance Analytics complements Case Teams and Knowledge Management by providing actionable insights for continuous improvement. Tracking metrics such as SLA compliance, recurring issues, resolution times, and customer satisfaction allows managers to identify trends and make data-driven decisions. For instance, recurring delays in certain case types may indicate gaps in process, knowledge, or resource allocation. Analytics provide the evidence needed to implement corrective measures, whether through additional training, process optimization, or system enhancements. Furthermore, Performance Analytics allows managers to measure the effectiveness of Knowledge Management content and Case Team structures, ensuring that interventions are impactful and aligned with organizational goals. By integrating analytics into daily operations, managers can proactively address performance issues before they escalate, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Option A, allowing agents to manage cases independently, lacks structure and accountability. In the absence of standardized updates or collaborative oversight, SLA compliance can be compromised, recurring issues may continue unchecked, and customer satisfaction is likely to decline. Independent management may also result in inconsistent service delivery, as each agent follows their own approach, which may not align with organizational standards or best practices.

Option C, escalating cases only after SLA breaches, is a reactive approach. By waiting until service levels are breached, organizations fail to prevent negative customer experiences, which may lead to dissatisfaction and reputational harm. This method does not address the underlying causes of recurring problems and reduces opportunities for proactive process improvements.

Option D, tracking only case closure counts, provides a narrow view of operational performance. Closure numbers alone fail to capture resolution quality, SLA adherence, or customer sentiment. This limited perspective can encourage a focus on quantity rather than quality, resulting in incomplete resolutions and repeated customer contacts. Without the insights offered by analytics, organizations are unable to identify patterns, address recurring issues, or implement meaningful improvements, which ultimately hinders the overall effectiveness of customer service operations.

The integration of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics under Option B ensures that all aspects of case management are addressed in a systematic and proactive manner. Case Teams guarantee accountability and effective collaboration, Knowledge Management empowers both agents and customers with relevant information, and Performance Analytics provides the insights required for continuous improvement. Together, these components create a robust, scalable, and proactive framework that enhances operational efficiency, reduces recurrence, ensures SLA compliance, and significantly improves customer satisfaction.

This approach also strengthens organizational capability by embedding processes that allow continuous learning and adaptation. As case volumes increase or customer expectations evolve, the combined use of Case Teams, Knowledge Management, and Performance Analytics allows the organization to maintain high performance without compromising service quality. Structured collaboration ensures tasks are assigned effectively, knowledge sharing prevents duplication and inconsistency, and analytics provide the data needed to optimize processes over time.

ServiceNow CIS-CSM Certified Implementation Specialist — Customer Service Management Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q61-75

ServiceNow CIS-CSM Certified Implementation Specialist — Customer Service Management Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q61-75

Related posts: