Checkpoint 156-315.81.20 Certified Security Expert — R81.20 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Checkpoint 156-315.81.20 Certified Security Expert — R81.20 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Visit here for our full Checkpoint 156-315.81.20 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 91

Which R81.20 feature allows administrators to enforce security policies based on the location, role, and identity of the user across multiple network segments?

A) Identity Awareness
B) Application Control
C) URL Filtering
D) Anti-Bot

Answer: A) Identity Awareness

Explanation: 

Identity Awareness in Check Point R81.20 is a critical feature that links network traffic to authenticated users, groups, or roles, enabling administrators to enforce security policies dynamically across multiple network segments. Unlike traditional IP-based policies, which may fail to account for dynamic IP addresses, VPN users, or mobile devices, Identity Awareness provides context-aware enforcement, ensuring that policies follow users regardless of device or location. It integrates with directory services such as Active Directory, LDAP, or RADIUS, allowing seamless mapping of user accounts to network activity.

Administrators can define rules that permit or restrict access to applications, websites, or network segments based on user role or group membership. For example, finance department users can access sensitive financial databases, while other users are restricted, regardless of their IP address. Similarly, remote users connecting via VPN can be assigned policies based on their authenticated identity. Identity Awareness also enhances integration with Application Control and URL Filtering, allowing administrators to create policies that are both identity- and application-aware. Logging and reporting provide visibility into user activity, compliance enforcement, and potential security incidents.

Application Control identifies applications on the network and enforces rules based on category, functionality, or risk. While it manages application behavior, it does not provide granular control based on user identity or location, making it insufficient for identity-based policy enforcement.

URL Filtering categorizes websites and enforces access rules based on content, reputation, or risk level. Although it can restrict web access, it does not dynamically apply policies based on user identity or network segment. Its focus is content-based rather than identity-based enforcement.

Anti-Bot monitors endpoint traffic for communications with known or suspected command-and-control servers. While it protects endpoints from botnet activity, it does not enforce user-based policies or control access across network segments. Its primary function is threat prevention rather than policy enforcement.

Identity Awareness is essential in R81.20 deployments to provide a security framework that adapts to dynamic user environments. By linking policies to user identity rather than IP addresses, administrators can maintain consistent policy enforcement across internal, remote, and cloud-based network segments. Detailed logging and reporting ensure accountability, support compliance audits, and allow analysis of user activity trends. Integration with other security blades such as Application Control, URL Filtering, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction ensures that identity-based security is layered, proactive, and comprehensive. This capability significantly reduces security risks, ensures that only authorized users access sensitive resources, and maintains operational efficiency across the enterprise network.

Question 92

Which R81.20 feature sanitizes documents by removing macros, scripts, and embedded content to deliver safe files to users without affecting usability?

A) Threat Extraction
B) Threat Emulation
C) URL Filtering
D) Anti-Bot

Answer: A) Threat Extraction

Explanation:

Threat Extraction in Check Point R81.20 is a preventive security technology that ensures safe document delivery by removing active content such as macros, scripts, and embedded objects from files. Malware often spreads through documents containing embedded code, which executes when the file is opened, leading to ransomware infections, data breaches, or system compromise. Threat Extraction prevents such attacks by producing a sanitized version of the original file that preserves readability and usability for the end-user while stripping potentially malicious elements.

Administrators can configure Threat Extraction policies based on file type, source, destination, and risk level. For example, Office documents, PDFs, and image files can be automatically sanitized before delivery. Threat Extraction works alongside Threat Emulation for a layered defense: while Threat Emulation blocks unknown or suspicious malware dynamically, Threat Extraction ensures that safe delivery of legitimate files is maintained without exposing users to risk. Detailed reporting and logging provide visibility into sanitized files, user activity, and potential threats, supporting operational monitoring and compliance.

Threat Emulation inspects files in a sandbox to detect unknown malware. While it provides advanced threat detection, it does not modify or sanitize files for safe delivery. Its focus is malware detection, not file content modification.

URL Filtering categorizes websites and enforces web access policies. While it can prevent access to malicious web resources, it does not sanitize or modify document files to prevent malware execution. Its functionality is focused on web traffic, not file safety.

Anti-Bot monitors endpoint communication for connections to known or suspected command-and-control servers. While it prevents malware propagation and botnet activity, it does not modify or deliver safe documents. Its role is network-level threat mitigation rather than file content security.

Threat Extraction is critical in R81.20 deployments because it balances user productivity and security. Users receive fully functional documents without risk from embedded threats, ensuring operational continuity while maintaining a proactive security posture. Integration with Threat Emulation, Anti-Bot, Application Control, and URL Filtering creates a layered defense strategy. Administrators can review logs and reports to identify potential threats, refine policies, and monitor user interactions with sanitized content. By removing dangerous content before delivery, Threat Extraction reduces the risk of infections, ransomware outbreaks, and data loss while maintaining business efficiency and compliance.

Question 93

Which R81.20 feature provides granular control over applications on the network, allowing policies based on category, functionality, or risk?

A) Application Control
B) URL Filtering
C) Identity Awareness
D) Threat Emulation

Answer: A) Application Control

Explanation:

Application Control in Check Point R81.20 is a security feature designed to provide administrators with visibility into and control over applications running on the network. Organizations today utilize a wide range of applications, including cloud services, collaboration tools, and web-based platforms. Some applications may introduce security risks, bandwidth consumption issues, or compliance challenges. Application Control identifies these applications even if they use non-standard ports or encrypted traffic and allows administrators to enforce policies based on category, functionality, or risk level.

Administrators can permit or restrict specific features of an application rather than blocking the entire app. For instance, chat functions in a collaboration tool may be allowed, but file-sharing capabilities can be restricted to prevent potential data leakage. Application Control integrates with Identity Awareness, enabling policies to follow specific users or groups dynamically, and works in conjunction with URL Filtering to enforce web-related restrictions. Detailed reporting provides visibility into application usage trends, compliance violations, and potential security risks, allowing proactive management and optimization of network resources.

URL Filtering controls access to websites based on category, reputation, or risk, but does not provide granular control over application features or enforce policies for non-web applications. Its focus is content and web-based access.

Identity Awareness links traffic to authenticated users or groups to enforce identity-based policies. While it enriches the security policy context, it does not provide control over application functionality or risk management. Its purpose is identity mapping rather than application governance.

Threat Emulation inspects files in a sandbox to detect unknown malware. While essential for detecting threats, it does not manage or restrict application behavior. Its primary focus is malware detection, not application control.

Application Control is vital in R81.20 deployments for maintaining both security and productivity. By enforcing policies based on application type, functionality, and risk, organizations can prevent misuse, optimize bandwidth, and reduce exposure to threats. Integration with Identity Awareness, URL Filtering, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction provides layered protection, ensuring that applications are used safely while enabling business operations. Administrators benefit from actionable insights through reporting, enabling proactive policy adjustments and comprehensive application governance across the network.

Question 94

Which R81.20 feature provides encrypted remote access to corporate resources while enforcing endpoint security compliance before granting access?

A) Mobile Access Blade
B) Identity Awareness
C) Application Control
D) SmartEvent

Answer: A) Mobile Access Blade

Explanation:

The Mobile Access Blade in Check Point R81.20 is designed to provide secure, encrypted remote access for users connecting from outside the corporate network while ensuring that the devices meet predefined security policies. Remote work, mobile devices, and third-party contractors have increased the importance of verifying endpoint compliance before granting network access. The Mobile Access Blade establishes VPN tunnels between remote devices and corporate resources, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of transmitted data. Additionally, it evaluates endpoint posture by checking parameters such as antivirus status, patch levels, firewall configuration, disk encryption, and the presence of necessary security software. If a device is non-compliant, access can be restricted, limited to a quarantine network, or denied entirely.

Identity Awareness maps network traffic to authenticated users, enabling identity-based policy enforcement across the network. While it allows dynamic policies based on user or group identity, it does not provide secure remote connectivity or evaluate endpoint compliance for remote devices.

Application Control identifies and restricts applications based on category, functionality, or risk level. While critical for managing application usage, it does not provide remote access or enforce compliance checks for endpoints before granting network access.

SmartEvent aggregates and correlates events from multiple gateways to detect threats. While it is essential for threat monitoring and analysis, it does not provide secure remote access or endpoint compliance enforcement.

The Mobile Access Blade is a key component in R81.20 for enabling secure remote access. It ensures that only authorized and compliant devices can connect to corporate resources, integrating with other security blades like Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, and Identity Awareness for a layered defense. Administrators gain visibility into endpoint posture, user activity, and access trends, which supports operational monitoring, regulatory compliance, and overall network security. By combining secure access with endpoint verification, the Mobile Access Blade mitigates risks associated with remote work and mobile devices, preventing potential data breaches, malware infections, and unauthorized access while maintaining operational efficiency.

Question 95

Which R81.20 feature inspects network traffic in real-time to detect and prevent malware infections, including zero-day threats?

A) Threat Emulation
B) Threat Extraction
C) Anti-Bot
D) SecureXL

Answer: A) Threat Emulation

Explanation:

Threat Emulation in Check Point R81.20 is a proactive security feature designed to detect and prevent unknown malware, including zero-day threats. Traditional signature-based antivirus solutions cannot detect previously unknown malware. Threat Emulation addresses this by executing files in a virtual sandbox environment that mimics a real user system. This allows the firewall to observe the behavior of files in real-time, identifying malicious actions such as attempts to modify system files, encrypt documents, connect to command-and-control servers, or inject code into other processes.

Once a file is determined to be malicious, the firewall can block or quarantine it before it reaches end-users. Threat Emulation integrates with ThreatCloud, Check Point’s global threat intelligence network, to share newly detected malware information, enabling other gateways worldwide to be protected against the same threat in real-time. Reporting and logging provide visibility into sandboxed files, malware trends, and network protection effectiveness.

Threat Extraction sanitizes files by removing active content, such as macros, scripts, and embedded objects. While it prevents malware execution in documents, it does not perform behavioral analysis or detect zero-day threats. Its function is content sanitization, not proactive threat detection.

Anti-Bot monitors endpoints for communication with known or suspected command-and-control servers. While it blocks malicious network traffic, it does not analyze file behavior to detect new malware. Anti-Bot focuses on post-infection traffic control rather than proactive malware detection.

SecureXL optimizes firewall performance by offloading repetitive packet processing tasks and caching connection states. While essential for throughput and performance, SecureXL does not inspect traffic for malware. Its purpose is performance optimization rather than threat detection.

Threat Emulation is critical in R81.20 deployments to prevent unknown threats from reaching users or endpoints. By combining dynamic sandboxing with ThreatCloud intelligence, it offers comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks and ransomware. Integration with other blades, including Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, Application Control, and URL Filtering, ensures layered security. Administrators gain detailed insights into malicious activity, while safe files are delivered seamlessly, maintaining both security and business continuity. This proactive approach significantly reduces the risk of malware outbreaks, data exfiltration, and operational disruption.

Question 96

Which R81.20 feature categorizes websites and enforces policies to block access to malicious, risky, or non-business-related web content?

A) URL Filtering
B) Application Control
C) Identity Awareness
D) Anti-Bot

Answer: A) URL Filtering

Explanation:

URL Filtering in Check Point R81.20 is a web security feature that categorizes websites and enforces policies to manage access based on content, reputation, or risk level. Organizations use URL Filtering to prevent users from accessing malicious websites, phishing domains, inappropriate content, or non-business-related web services. URL Filtering operates by inspecting HTTP and HTTPS traffic, and when integrated with HTTPS Inspection, it can evaluate encrypted web traffic for potential threats. Policies can be applied globally or based on user identity, group membership, role, or network segment, allowing administrators to tailor access control dynamically.

URL Filtering is integrated with ThreatCloud, ensuring real-time updates on malicious websites, phishing domains, and emerging web-based threats. Administrators can create allow, block, or limited access rules for categories like social media, gambling, adult content, or malware-hosting sites. Detailed reporting and logging provide visibility into user web activity, policy violations, and security trends, supporting auditing, compliance, and operational monitoring.

Application Control identifies and manages applications running on the network based on category, functionality, or risk. While it may influence web-based applications, it does not provide comprehensive website categorization or block access based on URL content. Its focus is on controlling application behavior, not web content filtering.

Identity Awareness maps network traffic to authenticated users or groups for policy enforcement. While it enables identity-based access, it does not categorize websites or block access based on content or reputation. Its function is identity mapping rather than web access control.

Anti-Bot monitors outbound communications from endpoints to known or suspected command-and-control servers. While it prevents malware propagation, it does not categorize websites or enforce web content policies. Its focus is threat prevention, not content control.

URL Filtering is crucial in R81.20 deployments to maintain security, compliance, and productivity. By controlling web access based on category, reputation, and risk, it ensures users cannot access malicious or inappropriate content while enabling business-related web usage. Integration with Application Control, Identity Awareness, Threat Emulation, and Anti-Bot provides a multi-layered security framework, delivering both preventive and detective capabilities for web threats. Reporting and monitoring allow administrators to detect anomalies, refine policies, and enforce web security consistently across the organization.

Question 97

Which R81.20 feature allows administrators to view, search, and analyze logs in real-time across multiple gateways to identify potential threats and policy violations?

A) SmartView Tracker
B) SmartView Monitor
C) SecureXL
D) Threat Extraction

Answer: A) SmartView Tracker

Explanation:

SmartView Tracker in Check Point R81.20 is a centralized logging and monitoring tool that provides administrators with real-time visibility into events and activities occurring across multiple gateways. It is designed to collect, display, and analyze logs from all enabled security blades, including Firewall, Application Control, URL Filtering, Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, and Identity Awareness. The tool allows administrators to quickly search logs using multiple parameters such as source and destination IP addresses, user identity, application type, and action taken. This capability is critical for identifying policy violations, detecting suspicious or anomalous behavior, and investigating security incidents.

SmartView Tracker also supports filtering, sorting, and exporting of logs, allowing administrators to drill down into specific events for detailed analysis. Real-time alerts can be configured to notify security teams when certain predefined conditions occur, such as attempts to access blocked websites, malware detection, or unauthorized application usage. Integration with SmartEvent further enhances its functionality, as correlated logs can be used to detect complex attacks spanning multiple gateways and generate actionable reports.

SmartView Monitor provides operational visibility into system performance, including CPU, memory, bandwidth, and traffic patterns. While it helps monitor firewall health and throughput, it does not offer detailed log analysis for detecting security threats or policy violations.

SecureXL is a performance optimization feature that accelerates firewall packet processing and caches connection states. While it improves throughput and reduces latency, it does not provide visibility into logs or support real-time event analysis.

Threat Extraction sanitizes documents by removing active content to deliver safe files to users. It does not provide real-time log analysis or visibility into network events.

SmartView Tracker is essential in R81.20 deployments because it allows security administrators to maintain a proactive security posture. By providing detailed visibility into user activity, application usage, web access, and security events, it supports timely detection of threats, compliance reporting, and forensic investigations. Its integration with other security blades ensures that all logged activity is available for review, making it easier to enforce security policies and respond to incidents effectively. Detailed reporting and search capabilities also assist in trend analysis, helping organizations to identify patterns of suspicious behavior, optimize policies, and enhance overall network security.

Question 98 

Which R81.20 feature provides real-time alerts and detailed reports for security incidents by correlating logs from multiple gateways?

A) SmartEvent
B) SmartView Tracker
C) Identity Awareness
D) SecureXL

Answer: A) SmartEvent

Explanation:

SmartEvent in Check Point R81.20 is a centralized event correlation and reporting system designed to aggregate logs from multiple gateways, analyze them in real-time, and provide actionable alerts and detailed reports on security incidents. By correlating events from various security blades, including Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, Application Control, URL Filtering, and Identity Awareness, SmartEvent can identify complex, multi-stage attacks that may not be visible from a single gateway’s logs.

Administrators can define custom correlation rules to detect patterns of suspicious behavior, such as repeated failed login attempts, lateral movement across network segments, or attempts to access restricted applications or websites. When these rules are triggered, SmartEvent generates alerts, sends notifications to security teams, and logs detailed information for further investigation. Dashboards provide visual representations of ongoing attacks, security trends, and policy violations, while reporting tools enable historical analysis, compliance tracking, and executive-level summaries.

SmartView Tracker allows administrators to search, view, and analyze logs, but does not perform event correlation or generate alerts based on complex attack patterns. Its functionality is focused on log inspection rather than proactive threat detection.

Identity Awareness maps network traffic to authenticated users or groups for policy enforcement. While it enriches logs with identity context, it does not correlate events across multiple gateways or generate real-time alerts for security incidents.

SecureXL accelerates firewall throughput by offloading packet processing tasks. While it improves performance, it does not provide event correlation, alerting, or reporting capabilities.

SmartEvent is critical in R81.20 deployments because it enables administrators to detect, analyze, and respond to sophisticated threats promptly. By correlating events across gateways and integrating with other security blades, it provides a comprehensive view of the security posture, allowing organizations to implement layered defenses, respond to incidents efficiently, and maintain compliance with regulatory requirements. The detailed reporting and alerting capabilities also support proactive security management, helping to identify vulnerabilities and optimize policies to prevent future incidents.

Question 99

Which R81.20 feature inspects encrypted web traffic to enforce security policies without compromising user privacy or business functionality?

A) HTTPS Inspection
B) URL Filtering
C) Identity Awareness
D) Threat Emulation

Answer: A) HTTPS Inspection

Explanation:

HTTPS Inspection in Check Point R81.20 is a security feature that enables firewalls to inspect encrypted web traffic (HTTPS) for threats, policy violations, and sensitive data without compromising user privacy or business functionality. With the increasing use of SSL/TLS encryption, malicious actors often leverage encrypted channels to deliver malware, exfiltrate data, or perform phishing attacks. HTTPS Inspection decrypts the traffic, applies security policies such as Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, Application Control, and URL Filtering, and then re-encrypts the traffic before delivering it to the user.

Administrators can configure HTTPS Inspection policies based on user groups, websites, file types, or risk levels to ensure that only relevant traffic is decrypted and inspected. This selective approach minimizes privacy concerns while maintaining robust security enforcement. Detailed logging provides insight into inspected sessions, detected threats, and blocked content, supporting operational monitoring, compliance reporting, and forensic investigations. Integration with ThreatCloud ensures that encrypted traffic is analyzed against the latest threat intelligence for real-time protection.

URL Filtering categorizes websites and enforces access policies, but does not decrypt HTTPS traffic to analyze its content. Without HTTPS Inspection, URL Filtering cannot inspect encrypted sessions, limiting visibility and enforcement.

Identity Awareness maps traffic to authenticated users or groups for policy enforcement. While it provides user-specific context, it does not decrypt or inspect HTTPS traffic.

Threat Emulation analyzes files for unknown malware in a sandbox environment, but cannot inspect encrypted traffic unless it is decrypted first by HTTPS Inspection. Its function is proactive malware detection, not encrypted traffic handling.

HTTPS Inspection is essential in R81.20 deployments to ensure that encrypted web traffic does not become a blind spot for security enforcement. By decrypting, inspecting, and re-encrypting traffic, it allows the full range of security blades to operate effectively while maintaining business continuity and user privacy. Administrators gain visibility into encrypted traffic, can detect threats hiding in SSL/TLS sessions, and enforce comprehensive security policies without interrupting legitimate business operations. This capability, combined with URL Filtering, Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, and Identity Awareness, creates a layered security approach that addresses both encrypted and unencrypted network traffic.

Question 100

Which R81.20 feature allows administrators to create security policies that apply differently based on the type of device, operating system, or endpoint security posture?

A) Endpoint Compliance (Host Check)
B) Identity Awareness
C) Threat Emulation
D) SecureXL

Answer: A) Endpoint Compliance (Host Check)

Explanation:

Endpoint Compliance, also known as Host Check in Check Point R81.20, is a security feature that evaluates the security posture of endpoints before granting network access. This ensures that devices connecting to the corporate network meet predefined security requirements. Host Check can inspect parameters such as antivirus software, firewall status, operating system versions, patches, disk encryption, and installed applications. If an endpoint does not comply with the defined security policy, it can be blocked, quarantined, or given limited access to specific network resources.

Identity Awareness maps users to IP addresses and applies identity-based policies, but it does not evaluate the security posture of endpoints.

Threat Emulation executes files in a sandbox to detect zero-day malware and threats. While essential for file security, it does not assess endpoint compliance or enforce network access restrictions based on device posture.

SecureXL accelerates firewall throughput and optimizes packet processing. It does not enforce security policies based on endpoint compliance or device type.

Endpoint Compliance is critical in R81.20 because it ensures that only trusted and secure devices can access the corporate network. This reduces the risk of malware propagation, data breaches, and unauthorized access. It integrates with other security blades, providing a layered defense strategy, and supports detailed reporting for auditing and compliance purposes. Administrators can define policies tailored to different device types, operating systems, and roles, ensuring that organizational security standards are consistently enforced across all endpoints. By proactively validating device security before network access, Endpoint Compliance enhances overall network integrity, reduces attack surfaces, and strengthens the organization’s security posture while maintaining operational efficiency and user productivity.

Question 101

Which R81.20 feature allows administrators to restrict web access by categories such as social media, gambling, and adult content while allowing safe business-related access?

A) URL Filtering
B) Application Control
C) Identity Awareness
D) Threat Extraction

Answer: A) URL Filtering

Explanation:

URL Filtering in Check Point R81.20 is a web security feature designed to categorize websites and enforce policies to manage access to web content. Organizations can block or limit access to non-business-related categories such as social media, gambling, adult content, or malware-hosting websites while allowing access to safe, business-relevant sites. URL Filtering inspects HTTP and HTTPS traffic, and when combined with HTTPS Inspection, it can analyze encrypted web sessions to enforce policies effectively.

Application Control manages applications running on the network, but does not categorize websites or enforce web-based restrictions. While it can control access to web-based applications, it is not designed to categorize or filter website content specifically.

Identity Awareness maps network traffic to authenticated users or groups to enforce user-based policies. While it can enrich URL Filtering policies with identity context, it does not categorize websites or restrict access based on content itself.

Threat Extraction sanitizes files by removing potentially malicious content before delivery. It does not control or categorize web access and focuses solely on file-based threats.

URL Filtering is essential in R81.20 deployments because it helps organizations enforce acceptable use policies, prevent access to malicious or inappropriate sites, and maintain productivity. Integration with other security blades, such as Identity Awareness, Threat Emulation, and Threat Extraction, enhances the ability to apply layered security, ensuring users are protected while accessing web resources. Detailed logging and reporting provide insight into user behavior, policy enforcement, and potential security risks, supporting compliance, auditing, and operational monitoring. By controlling access to web content effectively, URL Filtering reduces exposure to threats, ensures safe browsing, and aligns user activity with organizational security and business requirements.

Question 102 

Which R81.20 feature provides real-time protection against botnets by monitoring endpoints for communication with known or suspected command-and-control servers?

A) Anti-Bot
B) Threat Emulation
C) SecureXL
D) Application Control

Answer: A) Anti-Bot

Explanation:

Anti-Bot in Check Point R81.20 is designed to protect endpoints from being recruited into botnets by monitoring outbound traffic for communication with known or suspected command-and-control (C&C) servers. Botnets can be used for various malicious activities, including distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, ransomware distribution, and data exfiltration. Anti-Bot detects suspicious communication patterns from endpoints and blocks connections to C&C servers in real-time, mitigating the risk of malware propagation and compromise.

Threat Emulation inspects files for unknown malware in a sandbox environment. While critical for malware detection, it does not monitor live network traffic from endpoints or prevent communication with C&C servers.

SecureXL optimizes firewall performance by offloading packet processing, but does not protect botnet communication or endpoint monitoring. Its function is performance optimization rather than threat prevention.

Application Control regulates the use of applications based on category, functionality, or risk. While it manages application usage, it does not detect or block malware communications with C&C servers.

Anti-Bot is crucial in R81.20 deployments because it proactively prevents compromised devices from participating in botnets and spreading malware across the network. By leveraging ThreatCloud intelligence, Anti-Bot maintains an up-to-date list of known malicious servers and adapts to emerging threats. Detailed reporting and monitoring provide visibility into compromised devices, attempted C&C communications, and threat trends, supporting incident response, compliance, and operational security. Integration with Threat Emulation, Threat Extraction, URL Filtering, and Application Control ensures a layered security approach, offering comprehensive protection against malware, botnet attacks, and other advanced threats while maintaining business continuity and operational efficiency.

Question 103

Which R81.20 feature allows administrators to enforce security policies based on application identity, category, or risk, even when applications use non-standard ports or encrypted traffic?

A) Application Control
B) URL Filtering
C) Identity Awareness
D) Threat Emulation

Answer: A) Application Control

Explanation:

Application Control in Check Point R81.20 is designed to provide granular visibility and control over network applications. Many modern applications can bypass traditional port-based policies by using non-standard ports or encrypted traffic. Application Control overcomes this by identifying applications based on behavioral patterns, signatures, and other traffic characteristics rather than relying solely on port numbers or IP addresses. This allows administrators to enforce security policies that permit, restrict, or block applications based on their category, functionality, or risk level.

URL Filtering restricts access to websites based on category or reputation. While it can block malicious or inappropriate sites, it does not provide comprehensive control over application behavior across ports or encrypted traffic. Its focus is web access rather than network-wide application management.

Identity Awareness maps traffic to users or groups and allows policies to be applied based on identity. While powerful for identity-based access control, it does not identify applications or enforce rules based on their category or risk.

Threat Emulation inspects files for unknown malware in a sandbox environment. Although essential for threat prevention, it does not manage applications, ports, or application functionality.

Application Control is critical in R81.20 because it allows organizations to maintain productivity and security simultaneously. Administrators can allow safe applications, block risky ones, and enforce policies that reduce exposure to threats. By integrating with Identity Awareness and URL Filtering, Application Control ensures that rules are context-aware, providing both security and operational flexibility. Detailed logging and reporting offer insights into application usage, helping optimize policies and detect anomalies. This layered approach ensures that network traffic is managed effectively while maintaining protection against unauthorized or high-risk applications.

Question 104

Which R81.20 feature inspects files in a sandbox to detect previously unknown malware or zero-day threats before reaching endpoints?

A) Threat Emulation
B) Threat Extraction
C) Anti-Bot
D) SecureXL

Answer: A) Threat Emulation

Explanation:

Threat Emulation in Check Point R81.20 is a proactive malware detection technology that analyzes files in a virtual sandbox environment before allowing them to reach users. Unlike signature-based antivirus solutions, which cannot detect unknown malware, Threat Emulation executes files to observe their behavior. It looks for malicious activities such as attempts to modify system files, encrypt data, communicate with command-and-control servers, or inject code into other processes. Files identified as malicious are blocked or quarantined, preventing infections from reaching endpoints.

Threat Extraction removes potentially dangerous content from documents but does not execute files to detect unknown malware. Its purpose is to deliver safe files rather than detect new threats.

Anti-Bot monitors endpoint traffic for communication with known or suspected command-and-control servers. While it blocks malware propagation, it does not proactively detect unknown malware before execution.

SecureXL accelerates firewall performance by offloading repetitive packet processing. It does not inspect files for malware.

Threat Emulation is essential in R81.20 because it protects against zero-day attacks, ransomware, and unknown malware. By integrating with ThreatCloud, it updates malware intelligence in real-time across all gateways. Administrators can generate detailed reports on emulated files, trends, and blocked threats, which support proactive threat management and compliance reporting. The combination of Threat Emulation with Threat Extraction, Anti-Bot, Application Control, and URL Filtering ensures a multi-layered security approach that protects endpoints, data, and network resources.

Question 105 

Which R81.20 feature removes active content such as macros, scripts, and embedded objects from documents to deliver safe files to users?

A) Threat Extraction
B) Threat Emulation
C) Application Control
D) URL Filtering

Answer: A) Threat Extraction

Explanation:

Threat Extraction in Check Point R81.20 is a crucial component of the overall threat-prevention architecture, designed specifically to protect organizations from malicious content hidden within files, documents, and attachments. Modern attacks frequently rely on embedding harmful macros, scripts, executable objects, or concealed payloads inside everyday file formats such as PDFs, Office documents, archives, and images. These threats are often capable of bypassing traditional signature-based detection and may execute automatically when a user opens the file. Threat Extraction addresses this challenge by sanitizing files before they ever reach the end user, ensuring that organizations remain protected without sacrificing productivity or delaying access to business-critical documents.

Threat Extraction operates by removing active or potentially dangerous components from files, leaving behind a clean, safe version that maintains the usability and readability required for day-to-day work. For example, in a Word document, Threat Extraction will strip macros, embedded scripts, and advanced formatting features that can carry malicious code while preserving the text, layout, and essential business content. This allows employees to receive safe files immediately, enabling them to continue their workflows without interruption or exposure to hidden threats. It significantly reduces the risk of malware infections, ransomware execution, and targeted attacks that exploit document vulnerabilities.

Threat Extraction works hand in hand with Threat Emulation to provide a comprehensive, layered approach to file security. While Threat Extraction focuses on sanitization, Threat Emulation is designed to detect unknown malware through behavioral analysis in a secure sandbox environment. Files are detonated and monitored inside the sandbox to determine whether they exhibit malicious behavior, such as unauthorized system calls, file modifications, network connections, or attempts to deploy payloads. When both technologies operate together, Threat Extraction provides immediate protection by delivering sanitized files, and Threat Emulation further validates the safety of the original content. This layered workflow ensures both proactive and reactive protection: one layer prevents malicious content from reaching users, while the other confirms the presence or absence of threats in the original file.

However, Threat Emulation alone does not sanitize or modify documents, nor does it remove active content. Its responsibility is limited to detecting suspicious behavior. Even if Threat Emulation identifies a malicious file, it does not produce a sanitized version for user consumption. This distinction emphasizes why Threat Extraction is essential for improving productivity and enabling secure access to documents. Users do not have to wait for sandbox analysis to complete, and they receive safe files immediately, maintaining a smooth and uninterrupted workflow.

Application Control serves a completely different purpose within the Check Point ecosystem and does not offer any file sanitization capabilities. Its role is to monitor, categorize, and control application usage across the network, ensuring that only approved applications are used, bandwidth consumption is managed, and risky or unauthorized applications are restricted. Application Control improves governance and risk management, but does not provide any mechanism for stripping malicious content from files or protecting users from embedded threats.

Similarly, URL Filtering focuses on web access control and categorization. It identifies website types, blocks access to malicious or inappropriate content, and enforces corporate browsing policies. Although URL Filtering plays a vital role in preventing users from visiting harmful websites or downloading unsafe files, it does not modify or sanitize document content. Its contribution to security lies in controlling where traffic originates rather than cleaning files that have already been downloaded or delivered via email.

Threat Extraction is particularly valuable in environments where employee productivity must remain high without compromising security controls. Users often rely on document sharing, email attachments, and downloaded files as part of their daily operations. Without Threat Extraction, organizations face a difficult trade-off: either block all potentially dangerous file types, hindering productivity, or permit them and risk malware infiltration. Threat Extraction resolves this dilemma by ensuring that clean versions of files are available instantly while the original versions undergo deeper inspection if needed. This approach effectively eliminates the most common attack vectors used by ransomware, phishing campaigns, and document-based exploits.

Another key advantage of Threat Extraction is the visibility it provides administrators. Security teams can monitor which files were sanitized, what elements were removed, how frequently users encounter potentially harmful documents, and which sources generate the most risk. These insights support regulatory compliance, audit readiness, and overall risk assessment. Administrators can fine-tune policies to balance security requirements with business needs, deciding which types of content should be removed automatically, which files require Threat Emulation, and which user groups may receive original documents under specific conditions.

Organizations also benefit from the consistency that Threat Extraction brings to their security posture. Regardless of how documents enter the environment—email, downloads, external devices, or collaboration tools—Threat Extraction ensures that all files are processed according to established policies. This uniformity prevents attackers from exploiting overlooked channels or less-secure entry points.

When Threat Extraction is deployed alongside other Check Point technologies such as Threat Emulation, URL Filtering, IPS, and Application Control, organizations achieve a fully layered and proactive security model. URL Filtering prevents access to malicious sites, IPS detects network-based exploits, Application Control governs which apps operate in the environment, and Threat Emulation analyzes suspicious files at the behavioral level. Meanwhile, Threat Extraction ensures that end users receive safe content immediately, preventing attacks even before full analysis completes. This layered defense strategy drastically reduces the probability of successful malware infections and ensures seamless business operations without unnecessary delays.

Threat Extraction in Check Point R81.20 plays a vital role in modern cybersecurity by preventing document-based threats, enabling safe and uninterrupted user workflows, supporting compliance efforts, and integrating seamlessly with other advanced Check Point protections. Its proactive, content-sanitization approach is essential for organizations that require strong security and continuous productivity in an increasingly hostile digital landscape.