Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 SD-WAN Architect Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q76-90
Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 76
Which Fortinet SD-WAN mechanism ensures seamless failover for real-time traffic such as VoIP and video calls without dropping active sessions?
A) Session-Aware Steering
B) Static Route Failover
C) Bandwidth Policing
D) Underlay Link Preference
Answer: A) Session-Aware Steering
Explanation:
Session-Aware Steering in Fortinet SD-WAN ensures that real-time traffic, including VoIP and video calls, can maintain session continuity even when underlying WAN links degrade or fail. Unlike traditional failover mechanisms that react only after a link becomes unreachable, Session-Aware Steering continuously monitors performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss for each active session. This real-time analysis allows the system to predict performance issues and proactively move traffic to an alternate path before the user experience is affected. The steering mechanism is session-aware, meaning it tracks the specific state of ongoing flows and maintains continuity during the switch, which is critical for delay-sensitive applications. It ensures that sessions are not interrupted by link failovers, preserving quality for interactive communications and reducing user complaints.
Static Route Failover relies on detecting link failure using standard routing protocols. Failover occurs only after a link is considered down, without taking into account current session performance. This reactive approach may cause dropped packets or interrupted sessions for real-time traffic, making it less suitable for applications sensitive to even brief disruptions. Static route failover lacks the intelligence to monitor active sessions or anticipate degradation.
Bandwidth Policing enforces traffic shaping to prevent congestion and ensure fair resource allocation. While it can influence network utilization and improve overall performance, it does not provide mechanisms to maintain session continuity during link failure or performance degradation. Policing is primarily a preventive measure rather than a dynamic failover tool.
Underlay Link Preference defines which physical WAN links are preferred based on administrative settings or routing metrics. It does not actively monitor session performance or manage failover based on real-time conditions. While it may guide path selection under normal conditions, it cannot ensure uninterrupted sessions when performance thresholds are violated.
Session-Aware Steering is the correct mechanism because it maintains the integrity of active flows during link degradation or failover. By continuously evaluating performance in real time and proactively adjusting traffic paths, it provides seamless user experience for mission-critical applications. It combines proactive monitoring, intelligent path selection, and session continuity, making it essential for enterprises with high reliance on real-time cloud services. The feature not only enhances application quality but also reduces operational complexity, as administrators do not need to manually monitor sessions or intervene during link events. Its design is optimized for modern, latency-sensitive applications that require predictable performance across distributed WAN environments.
Question 77
Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature allows centralized visibility and enforcement of security and performance policies across multiple branch sites?
A) FortiManager Orchestration
B) Local Interface Policing
C) Dynamic IP Routing Protocols
D) Manual Branch Configuration
Answer: A) FortiManager Orchestration
Explanation:
FortiManager Orchestration is the centralized management platform for Fortinet SD-WAN deployments that provides unified visibility and control over security, routing, and performance policies across multiple branches. With FortiManager, administrators can define policies once and deploy them consistently to all managed FortiGate devices, eliminating inconsistencies and reducing operational overhead. Orchestration enables monitoring of traffic, link performance, and application behavior from a single interface, supporting SLA compliance and automated traffic steering. It also allows configuration backups, firmware management, and audit tracking, ensuring operational continuity and regulatory compliance. Centralized policy enforcement reduces human error and allows enterprises to scale their SD-WAN deployments efficiently, especially in environments with tens or hundreds of distributed branch sites. Orchestration supports zero-touch deployment, meaning new branches can be provisioned with pre-defined policies automatically without requiring local manual configuration, further simplifying management.
Local Interface Policing involves setting traffic limits or prioritizing flows on a specific WAN interface. While it contributes to quality control at a local level, it does not provide centralized visibility or consistent policy enforcement across multiple sites. Each branch would need independent configuration, increasing administrative burden.
Dynamic IP Routing Protocols, such as OSPF or BGP, provide path discovery and route updates based on network topology. Although these protocols are essential for connectivity and failover, they do not offer centralized policy control or integrated security enforcement. Routing protocols handle reachability but are not designed for branch-wide policy orchestration.
Manual Branch Configuration requires administrators to configure each branch independently. This approach is error-prone, time-consuming, and does not allow centralized monitoring or unified enforcement. Scaling this method across multiple locations is operationally inefficient and increases the risk of inconsistent policy application.
FortiManager Orchestration is correct because it consolidates configuration, monitoring, and policy enforcement into a single platform, providing enterprise-wide visibility and control. It ensures all branches adhere to consistent standards, enhances SLA-driven application performance, and simplifies management through automation and centralized oversight. This feature is critical for large distributed networks, where maintaining uniform policy enforcement manually would be impractical. By combining centralized monitoring with automated policy deployment, FortiManager enables both security and performance optimization, reducing operational costs while maintaining high service quality.
Question 78
Which SD-WAN strategy in Fortinet deployments enables optimal application performance by evaluating multiple link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss in real time?
A) Lowest Cost Path Routing
B) Performance-Based Path Selection
C) Static Default Routing
D) Administrative Distance Preference
Answer: B) Performance-Based Path Selection
Explanation:
Performance-Based Path Selection in Fortinet SD-WAN is designed to optimize application delivery by continuously monitoring multiple link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss, to determine the best available path for each application. This strategy ensures that traffic flows, particularly for real-time or business-critical applications, are always routed over links that meet SLA requirements. The SD-WAN engine evaluates live metrics in real time, allowing dynamic rerouting when performance degrades on the currently used path. This proactive approach maintains high-quality application experiences, prevents disruptions, and enables efficient use of multiple WAN links simultaneously. By assessing multiple performance criteria, administrators can guarantee that voice, video, and interactive cloud applications receive prioritized treatment and avoid bottlenecks or degraded service. Performance-based path selection is critical for enterprises relying on hybrid cloud architectures and multiple transport links, as it aligns network behavior with business priorities.
Lowest Cost Path Routing selects paths primarily based on administrative or economic metrics, such as MPLS cost versus broadband, without considering real-time performance. While it may reduce OPEX, it does not protect application experience during network congestion or underperforming links. Latency-sensitive applications may suffer if routed over cheaper but suboptimal links.
Static Default Routing assigns traffic to pre-defined paths without evaluating WAN link health or current network conditions. This approach does not adapt to changing performance metrics and can result in degraded application performance during outages or high-latency events. Static routing is predictable but inflexible, lacking the dynamic intelligence necessary for optimal SD-WAN operations.
Administrative Distance Preference prioritizes routing based on routing protocol metrics, such as OSPF cost or BGP preference. Although useful for standard routing decisions, it does not take into account application-specific performance or real-time link quality. Applications requiring low latency, low jitter, and minimal packet loss may be routed through less optimal paths if selection is purely metric-based.
Performance-Based Path Selection is correct because it evaluates multiple real-time WAN metrics and chooses paths that satisfy application SLA requirements. It provides dynamic, application-aware routing that improves user experience, prevents traffic disruptions, and optimizes link utilization. By continuously adjusting to live network conditions, this approach ensures mission-critical applications consistently receive the network quality they require. It combines proactive monitoring, adaptive path selection, and SLA alignment, which are foundational principles of modern SD-WAN performance management.
Question 79
Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature allows administrators to prioritize business-critical applications over best-effort traffic dynamically?
A) Bandwidth Policing
B) Application Steering Rules
C) Static Route Assignment
D) Manual Traffic Shaping
Answer: B) Application Steering Rules
Explanation:
Application Steering Rules in Fortinet SD-WAN are designed to prioritize business-critical applications dynamically, ensuring that latency-sensitive or high-priority traffic receives optimal routing and performance. The system identifies application traffic through deep packet inspection and matches each flow against defined service-level requirements. Once classified, the SD-WAN engine can automatically select the best available WAN path based on current performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. This approach ensures that critical applications, such as voice, video conferencing, and SaaS workloads, maintain consistent quality even when lower-priority traffic competes for the same links. Application Steering Rules are configurable at a granular level, allowing administrators to assign priorities, failover preferences, and SLA thresholds for each application category. This automated and application-aware routing removes the need for manual intervention and ensures predictable performance for essential business functions.
Bandwidth Policing restricts or shapes traffic on interfaces to prevent congestion, but does not dynamically select the best path for each application. While policing can enforce limits, it cannot prioritize flows based on performance metrics or application importance. Policing is a preventive control rather than an adaptive optimization mechanism.
Static Route Assignment fixes traffic to predetermined paths without considering current network conditions or application requirements. This approach does not accommodate fluctuating link performance and can lead to critical applications being routed over degraded paths. Static routing lacks the dynamic intelligence necessary for application-aware prioritization in SD-WAN.
Manual Traffic Shaping requires administrators to adjust flow priorities or bandwidth allocations individually, typically per interface or device. While it provides some level of control, it is not scalable and cannot respond in real time to changes in link quality or application needs. Manual shaping also increases operational complexity and does not offer the continuous adaptive optimization that SD-WAN provides.
Application Steering Rules are correct because they deliver dynamic, automated, and application-aware traffic management. By combining real-time performance monitoring with SLA-based routing decisions, these rules ensure high-priority applications consistently use the best-performing paths while less critical traffic utilizes remaining capacity. This improves end-user experience, maximizes WAN efficiency, and reduces the risk of performance degradation during periods of congestion or link instability. It aligns network operations with business objectives by directing critical flows over paths that meet their performance requirements and by automatically adjusting as network conditions change.
Question 80
Which SD-WAN path selection strategy in Fortinet ensures traffic is routed through the link with the lowest measured latency for real-time applications?
A) Lowest Cost Path
B) Best Performance Path
C) Lowest Latency First
D) Equal-Cost Multi-Path
Answer: C) Lowest Latency First
Explanation:
Lowest Latency First is an SD-WAN path selection strategy designed to route latency-sensitive traffic, such as voice, video, and interactive cloud applications, through the WAN path with the lowest measured latency. The system continuously monitors latency metrics across all available links using SLA probes and dynamically selects the path that offers the fastest end-to-end delivery. This approach minimizes delay and ensures that real-time applications maintain responsiveness, high quality, and minimal jitter. By prioritizing latency over other metrics for selected traffic, SD-WAN guarantees that sensitive flows do not experience disruptions or degradation due to slower or congested paths. The Lowest Latency First strategy is particularly important in hybrid cloud deployments and distributed enterprises, where multiple WAN circuits may vary in performance over time. This strategy is proactive and continuous, automatically rerouting flows when the previously selected path’s latency exceeds SLA thresholds.
Lowest Cost Path selects routes based on economic or administrative metrics, such as link pricing or MPLS cost. While cost considerations are important for optimizing OPEX, Lowest Cost Path does not evaluate real-time performance metrics. Routing solely based on cost can lead to poor experience for latency-sensitive applications, as a cheaper path may have high latency or jitter.
Best Performance Path considers multiple performance metrics, including jitter, packet loss, and throughput, in addition to latency. Although it provides an overall quality-based selection, it may not always prioritize latency as the primary criterion. Some latency-sensitive applications require minimal delay above all other metrics, making Best Performance Path less ideal when latency is the critical factor.
Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) distributes traffic across multiple links of equal routing cost to maximize bandwidth utilization. While this increases overall throughput, ECMP does not consider real-time latency or SLA compliance. Critical real-time applications may be split across multiple links, potentially introducing jitter and impairing session quality.
Lowest Latency First is correct because it directly optimizes the path for minimal delay, ensuring superior performance for time-sensitive traffic. It combines real-time measurement with automated selection and SLA compliance, allowing SD-WAN to maintain high-quality application delivery under dynamic network conditions. By routing only latency-critical traffic on the lowest-delay link, this strategy guarantees end-user satisfaction while maintaining efficient utilization of remaining WAN capacity.
Question 81
Which Fortinet SD-WAN capability allows for real-time adjustment of traffic paths based on live WAN link performance metrics and SLA thresholds?
A) Manual Route Override
B) Dynamic Path Steering
C) Fixed Priority Routing
D) Interface-Based Routing
Answer: B) Dynamic Path Steering
Explanation:
Dynamic Path Steering is a foundational Fortinet SD-WAN capability that enables automatic adjustment of traffic paths based on real-time link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. By continuously evaluating the health of all WAN connections against predefined SLA thresholds, the system can reroute traffic to ensure optimal application performance. This feature is particularly important for latency-sensitive or high-priority applications, as it prevents performance degradation by proactively selecting the best available path. Dynamic Path Steering eliminates the need for manual intervention, allowing SD-WAN to respond instantly to network fluctuations, outages, or congestion events. It supports multiple WAN transport types, including broadband, LTE, and MPLS, and ensures that business-critical applications consistently experience high-quality connectivity. The adaptive mechanism balances the needs of different application classes, enabling both high-priority and best-effort traffic to coexist efficiently on the same SD-WAN infrastructure.
Manual Route Override involves an administrator manually redirecting traffic to a different WAN path. While effective in specific troubleshooting scenarios, it is not scalable or real-time. It requires constant attention and cannot respond instantly to fluctuating link conditions, making it unsuitable for dynamic, latency-sensitive applications.
Fixed Priority Routing assigns traffic to predetermined paths based on static preferences or administrative configuration. This approach does not account for live link performance metrics or SLA compliance. Once the path is set, traffic continues along it even if the link degrades, which can lead to interrupted services and poor user experience.
Interface-Based Routing directs traffic through specific physical or logical interfaces without considering SLA metrics. While useful for simple deployments, this method lacks performance awareness and cannot dynamically adjust paths according to real-time conditions. It is inflexible in environments where multiple WAN paths fluctuate in quality.
Dynamic Path Steering is correct because it continuously evaluates link conditions and applies automated, SLA-driven decisions to steer traffic over the most suitable path. It supports high availability, performance optimization, and user experience consistency across distributed enterprises. By combining live monitoring, proactive rerouting, and application awareness, this capability represents the core intelligence behind Fortinet SD-WAN and its ability to optimize hybrid WAN environments. Enterprises benefit from reduced downtime, improved application performance, and lower operational complexity through this automated approach.
Question 82
Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature allows redundant WAN links to be combined into a single logical interface to provide higher throughput and resiliency?
A) Virtual WAN Link
B) Interface Bonding
C) Dynamic VLAN Aggregation
D) Static Link Pooling
Answer: A) Virtual WAN Link
Explanation:
The Virtual WAN Link feature in Fortinet SD-WAN enables multiple physical or logical WAN connections to be combined into a single, logical interface that acts as a unified transport path. This aggregated interface allows the SD-WAN engine to distribute traffic dynamically across all available links while maintaining a single point of configuration and management. The primary benefits of this feature include increased bandwidth utilization, enhanced resiliency, and simplified routing policies. By combining multiple WAN links into one virtual interface, administrators can deploy SLA-based path selection, performance monitoring, and intelligent application steering without needing to configure each link individually. Virtual WAN Links also support active-active usage, meaning traffic is simultaneously distributed over multiple paths, improving throughput while preventing single-link congestion. In the event of link failure, traffic is seamlessly rerouted across the remaining links without impacting ongoing sessions. This is particularly important for mission-critical and latency-sensitive applications such as VoIP, cloud-hosted services, and video conferencing. Virtual WAN Link forms the foundation for modern hybrid WAN architectures, allowing enterprises to optimize multiple transport types including broadband, MPLS, and LTE within a single, cohesive framework. Administrators can also define priorities, weights, and failover behavior, enabling precise control over traffic distribution according to business requirements. The feature effectively masks WAN complexity, reduces operational overhead, and ensures consistent service levels across the distributed network.
Interface Bonding involves linking multiple network interfaces at Layer 2 or Layer 3 to increase bandwidth but lacks application-level awareness and SD-WAN-specific SLA-driven routing. While it can aggregate capacity, it does not provide performance-based path selection or intelligent failover decisions. It operates purely at a lower networking layer and does not integrate with SD-WAN logic.
Dynamic VLAN Aggregation focuses on combining VLANs across switches to simplify LAN operations and improve network segmentation. It is unrelated to WAN link aggregation and does not affect SD-WAN performance or application routing. VLAN aggregation operates at the local network level, not across distributed WAN paths.
Static Link Pooling groups links together without real-time performance awareness. While this approach provides some redundancy, it lacks dynamic traffic distribution based on latency, jitter, or packet loss. It also does not support intelligent SLA-driven steering or proactive path selection. Traffic is treated equally, regardless of link quality, which can compromise application experience.
Virtual WAN Link is correct because it aggregates multiple WAN circuits into a single logical interface while integrating performance monitoring and SLA-based routing. This enables high availability, bandwidth optimization, and seamless failover. Enterprises benefit from simplified management, improved utilization of hybrid WAN resources, and predictable application performance across distributed networks. It is the foundational mechanism in Fortinet SD-WAN that allows traffic to flow intelligently, dynamically, and resiliently across multiple links while maintaining visibility and control.
Question 83
Which feature of Fortinet SD-WAN allows continuous monitoring of link performance using synthetic test traffic?
A) Passive Log Collection
B) SLA-Based Probes
C) SNMP Polling
D) Manual Ping Checks
Answer: B) SLA-Based Probes
Explanation:
SLA-Based Probes in Fortinet SD-WAN provide continuous monitoring of WAN link performance by sending synthetic traffic to evaluate metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. These probes simulate real application traffic without impacting production data, allowing administrators to measure the health of WAN paths proactively. The collected metrics are compared against predefined SLA thresholds for different applications, enabling the SD-WAN engine to make intelligent routing decisions in real time. When a link fails to meet SLA criteria, traffic is automatically rerouted to maintain application performance and user experience. SLA-Based Probes are essential for real-time services like voice, video, and interactive cloud applications, where consistent network quality is critical. The probes operate continuously, providing up-to-date insight into WAN path conditions and supporting proactive traffic management. This enables enterprises to maintain predictable performance across hybrid WANs and reduce downtime for critical applications. By decoupling monitoring from actual user traffic, SLA-Based Probes allow for accurate assessment of each path without interference from congestion or fluctuating workloads. They are integral to application-aware routing and session-aware steering, providing the foundation for dynamic path selection and automated failover.
Passive Log Collection relies on examining historical traffic logs to detect performance issues. It is reactive rather than proactive and cannot trigger real-time traffic rerouting. It only identifies problems after they have already affected user experience.
SNMP Polling retrieves performance metrics from network devices, such as interface utilization or errors. While useful for general monitoring, SNMP does not generate synthetic traffic to test end-to-end path performance. It cannot actively evaluate latency, jitter, or packet loss, making it insufficient for dynamic SD-WAN path selection.
Manual Ping Checks require administrators to initiate tests manually. This approach is labor-intensive, not continuous, and cannot scale to large distributed networks. It is suitable for troubleshooting, but does not provide the real-time automated intelligence necessary for SD-WAN operations.
SLA-Based Probes are correct because they provide active, continuous measurement of WAN path performance and integrate directly with dynamic routing decisions. They allow SD-WAN to detect degradation early, reroute traffic automatically, and maintain application performance across multiple transport links. By combining proactive testing with SLA enforcement, this feature ensures consistent quality for business-critical applications, reduces downtime, and simplifies operational management of distributed networks. It is the primary mechanism enabling performance-aware SD-WAN path selection and intelligent failover.
Question 84
What is the primary benefit of using Fortinet SD-WAN’s cloud-based orchestration platform for large enterprises?
A) It eliminates the need for MPLS entirely
B) It provides centralized management and consistent policy deployment
C) It disables dynamic path selection for improved stability
D) It requires branch administrators to manually configure each device
Answer: B) It provides centralized management and consistent policy deployment
Explanation:
Fortinet SD-WAN’s cloud-based orchestration platform provides centralized management and ensures consistent policy deployment across all branches and distributed sites in large enterprise environments. Administrators can define application-aware routing rules, security policies, SLA thresholds, and traffic prioritization once and deploy them uniformly across multiple FortiGate devices. Centralized orchestration reduces configuration drift, ensures compliance with corporate networking and security standards, and minimizes the operational burden associated with managing hundreds or thousands of branch locations. It also provides full visibility into WAN performance, application usage, and device status from a single pane of glass, allowing proactive troubleshooting and policy adjustments. The orchestration platform supports zero-touch provisioning, enabling new branches to come online automatically with pre-defined policies, reducing setup time and errors. This is critical in large-scale SD-WAN deployments, where manual configuration would be time-consuming and prone to mistakes. Centralized management simplifies updates, patching, and firmware upgrades, further improving network security and operational efficiency.
Eliminating MPLS is not a guaranteed benefit. SD-WAN supports hybrid WAN architectures, which may still include MPLS alongside broadband and LTE links. The orchestration platform facilitates policy and performance management, but does not inherently remove the need for certain transport types.
Disabling dynamic path selection would contradict the purpose of SD-WAN, which relies on adaptive routing based on link performance. The platform enhances, rather than limits, dynamic path steering by providing centralized intelligence and policy enforcement.
Requiring branch administrators to manually configure each device increases complexity, errors, and operational costs. Centralized orchestration exists specifically to avoid this manual effort, automating deployment and ensuring consistency.
Providing centralized management and consistent policy deployment is correct because it allows enterprises to maintain uniform configuration across all branches, enforce security and performance standards, and optimize WAN utilization efficiently. The platform supports visibility, automation, and scalability, enabling distributed enterprises to manage SD-WAN deployments reliably while reducing operational risks, improving performance, and maintaining compliance with corporate policies. It is a core benefit for large organizations seeking to simplify network operations and improve overall agility.
Question 85
Which Fortinet SD-WAN capability allows real-time traffic steering based on live application performance metrics?
A) Manual Route Configuration
B) Dynamic Path Selection
C) Static Priority Routing
D) Interface-Based Load Balancing
Answer: B) Dynamic Path Selection
Explanation:
Dynamic Path Selection in Fortinet SD-WAN is a core capability designed to ensure that application traffic is steered in real time according to current WAN link performance metrics. It continuously monitors latency, jitter, packet loss, and throughput to evaluate the quality of all available links and automatically selects the most appropriate path for each type of application traffic. By dynamically adjusting traffic paths, SD-WAN can maintain consistent application performance, particularly for latency-sensitive or business-critical applications such as VoIP, video conferencing, and cloud-based services. Dynamic Path Selection integrates with SLA-based policies, allowing administrators to define thresholds for acceptable performance, and when a link fails to meet these criteria, traffic is rerouted seamlessly without disrupting ongoing sessions. This capability also optimizes link utilization across hybrid WAN deployments by distributing traffic intelligently according to performance rather than static assignments or interface preferences. By leveraging real-time performance data, Dynamic Path Selection enhances user experience, prevents congestion, and ensures high availability in complex, distributed enterprise networks.
Manual Route Configuration requires administrators to statically assign traffic paths, which does not allow automatic adaptation to changing network conditions. This method is labor-intensive and reactive, meaning that any degradation in link quality could disrupt applications until manual intervention occurs. It does not support real-time performance-driven decisions.
Static Priority Routing establishes fixed priorities for paths or interfaces, ignoring real-time performance metrics. While it may provide a predictable routing hierarchy, it cannot adapt to sudden latency spikes, packet loss, or congestion, which could negatively impact application experience. Static priorities are inherently inflexible and do not support dynamic optimization of traffic.
Interface-Based Load Balancing distributes traffic across available interfaces based on predefined weights or policies. Although it balances utilization, it does not actively consider application-specific SLA metrics. Load balancing without real-time monitoring may result in high-priority applications traversing underperforming links, causing latency, jitter, or packet loss issues.
Dynamic Path Selection is correct because it continuously evaluates live WAN link conditions and automatically reroutes traffic according to defined SLA policies. By integrating real-time performance monitoring with intelligent routing, it ensures that critical applications consistently receive optimal paths while best-effort traffic is handled efficiently. This capability reduces downtime, improves productivity, and allows enterprises to fully leverage hybrid WAN deployments with multiple transport types. It forms a foundational component of Fortinet SD-WAN, supporting proactive management of network performance and application quality across distributed environments.
Question 86
Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature allows branch offices to continue routing traffic locally even when the central hub is temporarily unreachable?
A) Split-Tunneling Enforcement
B) Autonomous Self-Healing
C) Forward Error Correction
D) Overlay SLA Failover
Answer: B) Autonomous Self-Healing
Explanation:
Autonomous Self-Healing in Fortinet SD-WAN enables branch offices to continue operating independently if connectivity to the central hub or controller is lost. This feature allows local routing, security enforcement, and policy application to continue without disruption, ensuring that users experience minimal impact during temporary outages or intermittent WAN link failures. Autonomous Self-Healing maintains critical services, supports failover between available WAN paths, and enables session continuity for active traffic. By leveraging locally stored policies and path intelligence, branch devices can make routing decisions autonomously, reducing dependency on the central controller. This capability is particularly important in distributed enterprises where branch offices rely on hybrid WAN links for cloud connectivity, SaaS applications, and inter-branch communication. Autonomous Self-Healing ensures resilience and high availability by providing local survivability and maintaining business continuity even under network disruption.
Split-Tunneling Enforcement directs cloud-bound traffic to bypass central hubs, sending it directly to the internet. While useful for optimizing bandwidth and reducing latency, it does not provide autonomous operation during hub unavailability. Split-tunneling focuses on path optimization rather than local continuity.
Forward Error Correction protects data streams by duplicating or reconstructing lost packets to maintain transmission integrity. While it improves reliability for real-time traffic, it does not enable local routing or policy enforcement when a central hub becomes unreachable. It addresses packet loss but not operational independence.
Overlay SLA Failover evaluates link performance against SLA thresholds and redirects traffic when a path underperforms. This mechanism ensures optimal path selection but still depends on communication with the central hub for orchestration. Failover alone does not guarantee local routing autonomy if the hub is inaccessible.
Autonomous Self-Healing is correct because it empowers branch devices to continue functioning independently, enforcing routing and security policies locally. It minimizes service disruption, maintains active sessions, and enhances resilience across distributed environments. Enterprises benefit from uninterrupted access to applications and services, improved uptime, and reduced reliance on the central controller for day-to-day operations. By combining local intelligence with performance-aware routing, Autonomous Self-Healing supports consistent application delivery and enhances the reliability of Fortinet SD-WAN deployments in large, distributed networks.
Question 87
Which SD-WAN strategy in Fortinet deployments ensures high-quality real-time application delivery by evaluating latency, jitter, and packet loss for each WAN path?
A) Static Default Routing
B) Performance-Based Path Selection
C) Administrative Distance Routing
D) Lowest Cost Path
Answer: B) Performance-Based Path Selection
Explanation:
Performance-Based Path Selection in Fortinet SD-WAN is designed to guarantee high-quality delivery for real-time applications by continuously assessing WAN path metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. The SD-WAN engine compares these metrics against SLA thresholds defined for each application type, such as voice, video, or interactive cloud services. Traffic is dynamically routed through the path that meets the performance requirements, ensuring a predictable user experience. This proactive mechanism prevents degradation in sensitive applications and enables the network to adapt to changing conditions in real time. By evaluating multiple performance metrics, Performance-Based Path Selection goes beyond simple link availability, providing granular control over application performance while optimizing the use of multiple WAN links simultaneously. It is essential for hybrid WAN environments, where the quality of different transport options such as broadband, MPLS, and LTE can vary over time. The strategy supports both high-priority and best-effort traffic by allowing administrators to define distinct SLA thresholds for different application classes, ensuring that critical workloads receive the best-performing paths while non-critical flows utilize remaining capacity efficiently. Continuous monitoring, automated traffic steering, and SLA compliance together make Performance-Based Path Selection the cornerstone of application-aware SD-WAN operation.
Static Default Routing uses predefined paths without considering real-time performance metrics. It cannot react to network degradation, which risks poor user experience for latency-sensitive applications. Traffic continues along predetermined paths regardless of link quality.
Administrative Distance Routing prioritizes routes based on routing protocol metrics rather than application performance. While it determines path selection in traditional routing, it does not evaluate latency, jitter, or packet loss. This approach is unsuitable for ensuring real-time application quality in dynamic WAN environments.
Lowest Cost Path prioritizes WAN links based on cost considerations instead of performance. It may send critical traffic over cheaper paths that are degraded or congested, compromising quality for sensitive applications. Cost optimization alone does not guarantee SLA compliance or predictable application delivery.
Performance-Based Path Selection is correct because it evaluates each WAN path continuously, using real-time measurements and SLA thresholds to route traffic intelligently. This ensures optimal performance for real-time applications, maintains session integrity, reduces downtime, and maximizes efficiency across hybrid WAN infrastructures. Enterprises benefit from consistent user experience, improved operational visibility, and adaptive traffic management, making this strategy fundamental to Fortinet SD-WAN deployments.
Question 88
Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature ensures that critical application sessions continue without interruption during WAN link degradation?
A) Session-Aware Steering
B) Interface-Based Load Balancing
C) Static Default Routing
D) Bandwidth Policing
Answer: A) Session-Aware Steering
Explanation:
Session-Aware Steering is a crucial feature in Fortinet SD-WAN that ensures ongoing application sessions remain uninterrupted when WAN links degrade or fail. Traditional failover mechanisms reroute traffic only after detecting a link failure, which can result in dropped packets and broken sessions, particularly for real-time applications such as VoIP, video conferencing, or interactive cloud-based services. Session-Aware Steering actively monitors the performance of all active sessions, including latency, jitter, and packet loss, to determine the optimal path for continued traffic delivery. By tracking the state of each session, the system can migrate flows seamlessly from an underperforming link to a healthier path without terminating the session. This capability maintains user experience, minimizes disruption, and preserves call quality or data continuity during WAN events. It is particularly beneficial for distributed enterprises with multiple branch offices relying on hybrid WAN links, ensuring business-critical applications remain resilient even when individual paths fluctuate in performance. Additionally, Session-Aware Steering integrates with SLA-driven policies, allowing administrators to define performance thresholds for specific applications and have traffic rerouted automatically when thresholds are violated. This proactive, application-aware mechanism reduces the need for manual intervention, prevents service degradation, and ensures consistent operational performance across complex WAN environments.
Interface-Based Load Balancing distributes traffic across multiple physical or logical interfaces to utilize bandwidth efficiently. While it balances utilization, it does not track active sessions or make path changes based on session performance. Therefore, it cannot guarantee uninterrupted application sessions during link degradation. Load balancing without session awareness may cause interruptions if traffic is switched mid-session.
Static Default Routing directs traffic along predetermined paths without considering real-time link conditions. If the primary path degrades, traffic remains on it until manual intervention or total failure occurs, which can disrupt critical sessions. This method lacks dynamic intelligence and is unsuitable for latency-sensitive or real-time applications.
Bandwidth Policing enforces limits or prioritization on traffic flows to prevent congestion. While it can improve overall link efficiency, it does not provide real-time path rerouting or session continuity. Policing affects rate control, not adaptive session management.
Session-Aware Steering is correct because it combines real-time monitoring, session tracking, and SLA-aware decision-making to ensure seamless traffic migration during WAN link performance issues. It maintains the integrity of active sessions, preserves application quality, and enhances user experience by proactively addressing path degradation. This feature exemplifies Fortinet SD-WAN’s ability to deliver resilient, application-aware connectivity across multiple links, supporting distributed enterprises in maintaining high-quality, uninterrupted access to mission-critical services.
Question 89
Which Fortinet SD-WAN mechanism allows administrators to monitor WAN link performance metrics continuously and automatically reroute traffic if SLA thresholds are violated?
A) SLA-Based Probes
B) Manual Ping Testing
C) Static Route Assignment
D) Interface Preference Rules
Answer: A) SLA-Based Probes
Explanation:
SLA-Based Probes in Fortinet SD-WAN provide continuous monitoring of WAN link performance and enable automatic rerouting of traffic if predefined SLA thresholds are violated. These probes actively generate synthetic traffic to measure key metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss on each link. By comparing the measurements against SLA requirements defined for specific applications or traffic classes, the SD-WAN engine can detect underperforming links before they impact user experience. When a link fails to meet SLA criteria, traffic is automatically redirected to an alternative path that satisfies the performance requirements. This proactive monitoring mechanism ensures predictable delivery for real-time applications such as VoIP, video conferencing, and cloud-hosted workloads. SLA-Based Probes are integral to dynamic path selection and application-aware routing because they provide actionable intelligence for traffic steering decisions. By decoupling monitoring from production traffic, probes ensure accurate assessment of each path without influencing live sessions, allowing administrators to maintain application quality and reduce service disruptions across distributed WAN infrastructures. Enterprises benefit from automated performance management, improved resiliency, and reduced operational effort because traffic is rerouted dynamically in response to changing link conditions without requiring manual intervention. SLA-Based Probes also support performance reporting and historical analysis, enabling better capacity planning and proactive network optimization.
Manual Ping Testing requires administrators to trigger tests manually, which is not scalable or continuous. It does not provide real-time automation for rerouting traffic based on SLA compliance and cannot support distributed, dynamic SD-WAN operations.
Static Route Assignment sends traffic along predefined paths regardless of current link performance. It cannot adapt to latency spikes, jitter, or packet loss, potentially degrading the experience for latency-sensitive applications. Static routing is reactive rather than proactive.
Interface Preference Rules prioritize traffic based on administrative or static preferences, without monitoring real-time performance metrics. While preferences can influence path selection, they do not account for SLA compliance and cannot reroute traffic automatically in response to degraded link quality.
SLA-Based Probes are correct because they provide real-time, continuous evaluation of WAN links and integrate directly with traffic steering mechanisms. This ensures application performance meets defined service levels, enables automatic failover, and maintains session continuity. By proactively monitoring each path and enforcing SLA thresholds, SLA-Based Probes are foundational to Fortinet SD-WAN’s ability to deliver high-quality, resilient, and application-aware routing across hybrid WAN environments.
Question 90
Which SD-WAN strategy in Fortinet deployments prioritizes traffic delivery for latency-sensitive applications such as VoIP and video conferencing?
A) Lowest Latency First
B) Lowest Cost Path
C) Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP)
D) Static Routing
Answer: A) Lowest Latency First
Explanation:
Lowest Latency First is an SD-WAN strategy in Fortinet deployments that ensures latency-sensitive applications, such as VoIP, video conferencing, and interactive cloud applications, are routed through WAN paths with the lowest measured latency. The SD-WAN engine continuously monitors real-time latency metrics across all available links using SLA probes or synthetic traffic tests. When latency on the current path exceeds predefined thresholds, traffic is automatically rerouted to the path with the lowest delay. This proactive approach prevents poor user experience, call drops, and jitter that can degrade application quality. Lowest Latency First is particularly important in hybrid WAN deployments, where multiple transport links, such as MPLS, broadband, and LTE, may fluctuate in performance over time. The strategy ensures that mission-critical, real-time applications consistently use the fastest paths, while less sensitive traffic may be routed using secondary options, optimizing overall WAN efficiency and performance. By continuously evaluating latency and dynamically adjusting routes, the SD-WAN solution can maintain application SLA compliance, improve productivity, and reduce operational intervention.
Lowest Cost Path selects traffic paths based primarily on economic or administrative criteria, such as MPLS pricing or link cost. While this may reduce operational expenses, it does not guarantee latency optimization for real-time traffic. Latency-sensitive applications may suffer if routed over lower-cost but higher-latency paths.
Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) distributes traffic across multiple paths of equal routing cost. While this increases bandwidth utilization, it does not consider latency metrics. Traffic may traverse slower or congested paths, potentially impacting the quality of real-time applications such as voice or video.
Static Routing assigns fixed paths based on administrative configuration. It does not evaluate WAN link conditions or application performance metrics. Once a path is assigned, traffic continues along it regardless of congestion or latency spikes, making it unsuitable for applications requiring consistent low-latency delivery.
Lowest Latency First is correct because it continuously prioritizes paths based on latency measurements, ensuring optimal performance for time-sensitive applications. It integrates with SLA thresholds and dynamic path selection mechanisms to maintain a consistent user experience, prevent disruption, and optimize WAN utilization. This strategy embodies the core principle of application-aware SD-WAN in Fortinet deployments: intelligent, real-time routing to meet the performance needs of critical applications.