Microsoft AZ-500 Azure Security Technologies Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q106-120
Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-500 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 106
You need to detect and respond to brute-force attacks on Azure virtual machines in real-time and receive actionable alerts. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
B) Network Security Group
C) Azure Policy
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides advanced threat detection for Azure virtual machines, including brute-force login attempts, anomalous RDP or SSH connections, and suspicious behaviors. It generates real-time alerts, which can be integrated with Microsoft Sentinel or other SIEM platforms for centralized monitoring and incident response. Defender for Cloud also offers actionable recommendations such as enabling endpoint protection, implementing Just-in-Time (JIT) VM access, and applying critical security updates to strengthen VM security.
Network Security Groups filter inbound and outbound network traffic but cannot detect or respond to brute-force attacks.
Azure Policy enforces resource configuration compliance but does not monitor security events or detect threats in real-time.
Azure Key Vault secures cryptographic keys and secrets but does not provide VM monitoring or threat detection.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the correct solution because it combines preventive, detective, and responsive security measures. Endpoint protection ensures virtual machines are hardened against attacks, and continuous monitoring identifies abnormal behavior. JIT VM Access reduces the exposure window for attack vectors. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel allows automated response, centralized logging, and correlation of security events for faster remediation. This solution enhances the organization’s security posture by proactively detecting, alerting, and mitigating threats while providing audit-ready reporting for compliance frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.
Question 107
You need to enforce that all virtual machines in your Azure subscriptions are encrypted and provide centralized compliance visibility. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure Policy with encryption initiatives
B) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Azure Policy with encryption initiatives
Explanation:
Azure Policy allows administrators to define rules and enforce configurations for resources. By creating policies that require encryption for all virtual machines, non-compliant VMs can be blocked from deployment or automatically remediated. Initiatives allow grouping multiple policies for centralized governance, while compliance dashboards provide visibility into encrypted and non-encrypted VMs across subscriptions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides monitoring and security recommendations but does not enforce encryption policies.
Network Security Groups filter network traffic but cannot enforce encryption or provide compliance visibility.
Azure Key Vault stores encryption keys but does not enforce encryption on virtual machines.
Azure Policy with encryption initiatives is the correct solution because it enables centralized governance and ensures consistent security standards. Automated remediation brings non-compliant VMs into compliance without manual intervention. Compliance dashboards provide operational visibility and support regulatory reporting requirements. By enforcing encryption policies, organizations protect sensitive workloads, reduce the risk of data breaches, and maintain audit readiness across all subscriptions.
Question 108
You need to enforce secure access to Azure Storage accounts, ensuring traffic does not traverse the public internet. Which solution should you implement?
A) Private Endpoints
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Private Endpoints
Explanation:
Azure Private Endpoints enable private IP connectivity from a virtual network to Azure services, ensuring traffic remains on the Azure backbone network. Configuring Private Endpoints for Azure Storage accounts prevents public internet exposure and reduces the risk of unauthorized access. DNS integration ensures private resolution, and RBAC can restrict access further.
Azure Key Vault secures secrets and cryptographic keys but does not control network-level connectivity to storage accounts.
Network Security Groups filter traffic but cannot enforce private access or eliminate public exposure.
Azure Policy can enforce the deployment of Private Endpoints but does not implement connectivity itself.
Private Endpoints are the correct solution because they provide secure, private connectivity to approved networks. They reduce the attack surface, prevent data exfiltration, and support zero-trust security principles. Centralized logging allows auditing and compliance verification. This solution ensures that sensitive data in storage accounts is accessed securely without exposing it to public networks, strengthening overall security posture.
Question 109
You need to detect risky sign-ins in Azure AD, including impossible travel and unfamiliar locations, and enforce automated response actions. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Azure Policy
C) Network Security Group
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection identifies risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning and heuristics. It detects anomalies such as impossible travel, unfamiliar sign-in locations, atypical patterns, and leaked credentials. Administrators can configure automated responses such as enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) or requiring a password reset for high-risk sign-ins, mitigating the likelihood of account compromise.
Azure Policy enforces resource compliance but does not monitor identity or detect risky sign-ins.
Network Security Groups filter traffic but cannot monitor identity or access behavior.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud monitors resources for threats but does not analyze sign-in activity or risk.
Azure AD Identity Protection is the correct solution because it provides proactive detection and automated mitigation of identity-based threats. Integration with Conditional Access allows dynamic enforcement of security policies based on real-time risk levels. Audit logs provide compliance visibility, and administrators can quickly respond to high-risk sign-ins. This approach strengthens zero-trust security by ensuring that only legitimate users access resources while reducing the risk of unauthorized access due to compromised credentials.
Question 110
You need to implement just-in-time administrative access for Azure virtual machines to reduce exposure to attacks. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
B) Network Security Group
C) Azure Policy
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
Explanation:
Just-in-Time (JIT) VM Access in Microsoft Defender for Cloud keeps management ports closed until access is requested. Administrators request temporary access, which is time-limited, logged, and approved. This approach reduces the attack surface by preventing unauthorized access and brute-force attempts, while still allowing operational efficiency for administrative tasks.
Network Security Groups filter traffic but cannot enforce temporary or time-bound access.
Azure Policy enforces resource configuration but does not control administrative access.
Azure Key Vault stores keys and secrets but does not manage VM access.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access is the correct solution because it enforces least-privilege principles for administrative accounts. Temporary access reduces risk, logs provide audit trails, and integration with alerts enables rapid detection of suspicious activity. This solution supports compliance requirements, strengthens operational security, and ensures that administrative privileges are granted only when necessary, maintaining a robust security posture for virtual machines.
Question 111
You need to ensure that all Azure virtual machines are encrypted and that non-compliant VMs are automatically remediated. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure Policy with encryption initiatives
B) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Azure Policy with encryption initiatives
Explanation:
Azure Policy allows administrators to define and enforce rules for Azure resources. By creating policies that require virtual machine encryption, any VM deployed without encryption can be blocked or automatically remediated. Initiatives group multiple policies for streamlined management, and compliance dashboards provide centralized reporting across subscriptions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides security monitoring and recommendations but does not enforce encryption compliance on deployment.
Network Security Groups filter network traffic but do not enforce encryption or manage compliance for virtual machines.
Azure Key Vault stores keys and secrets but cannot enforce encryption policies on virtual machines.
Azure Policy with encryption initiatives is the correct solution because it ensures centralized governance and consistent application of security standards. Automated remediation brings non-compliant VMs into compliance, reducing the risk of data exposure. Compliance dashboards allow administrators to monitor encrypted and non-encrypted VMs across subscriptions, supporting regulatory and organizational requirements such as GDPR and HIPAA. This approach strengthens security posture by ensuring that sensitive workloads are protected, operational governance is maintained, and audit-ready reports are readily available.
Question 112
You need to enforce secure remote access to Azure virtual machines without exposing RDP or SSH ports publicly. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure Bastion
B) Network Security Group
C) Azure Policy
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Answer: A) Azure Bastion
Explanation:
Azure Bastion provides secure RDP and SSH connectivity to virtual machines directly through the Azure portal. It eliminates the need for public IP addresses on VMs, reducing exposure to potential attacks such as brute-force attempts. Connections use TLS over the Azure backbone network, ensuring secure communication. Bastion integrates with Azure AD for role-based access control and multi-factor authentication, and it maintains audit logs for monitoring access.
Network Security Groups filter traffic but still require open public ports, which increases security risk.
Azure Policy enforces compliance for resources but does not provide secure remote connectivity.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud monitors VM security but does not facilitate secure access.
Azure Bastion is the correct solution because it enables secure, auditable remote access without exposing VMs to the public internet. It reduces the attack surface, ensures access is restricted to authorized users, and supports compliance requirements. This solution aligns with zero-trust principles by enforcing identity-based access and secure connectivity, improving the organization’s overall security posture.
Question 113
You need to detect suspicious sign-ins in Azure AD and enforce automated responses such as multi-factor authentication or password reset. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Azure Policy
C) Network Security Group
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection detects risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning and heuristics. It identifies anomalies such as impossible travel, unfamiliar locations, atypical sign-in patterns, and leaked credentials. Administrators can configure automated responses like enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) or requiring password resets for high-risk sign-ins.
Azure Policy enforces resource configuration but does not monitor sign-ins or evaluate risk.
Network Security Groups filter traffic but cannot detect identity-based threats.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud monitors resources for security threats but does not analyze sign-in activity.
Azure AD Identity Protection is the correct solution because it enables proactive detection of identity threats and automated mitigation. Integration with Conditional Access allows dynamic enforcement based on risk levels. Audit logs provide visibility for compliance, and administrators can respond to high-risk sign-ins promptly. This strengthens zero-trust security by ensuring only legitimate users access corporate resources while minimizing risk from compromised credentials.
Question 114
You need to reduce exposure to attacks on Azure virtual machines by providing temporary administrative access when required. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
B) Network Security Group
C) Azure Policy
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
Explanation:
Just-in-Time (JIT) VM Access, a feature of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, is a critical security capability that enhances the protection of virtual machines by controlling administrative access. Unlike traditional remote access methods, where management ports such as RDP or SSH remain open and accessible at all times, JIT VM Access keeps these ports closed by default. This approach significantly reduces the attack surface, preventing potential exposure to brute-force attacks, port scanning, and unauthorized login attempts. By requiring administrators to request temporary access only when needed, JIT ensures that management ports are available strictly on a time-bound basis, aligning with the principles of least-privilege access and zero-trust security.
When an administrator requires access to a virtual machine, they submit a request specifying the duration and scope of the connection. This request can be automatically or manually approved depending on the organization’s workflow and security policies. Once approved, access is granted for a limited time window, after which the ports automatically close, returning the system to its secure baseline state. Every access request, approval, and session is logged in Microsoft Defender for Cloud, providing a comprehensive audit trail. These logs serve multiple purposes: they support compliance reporting, facilitate forensic investigations, and enable security teams to monitor and detect suspicious access patterns or anomalies.
Other Azure security tools provide complementary capabilities but do not fully address the problem of temporary, controlled access. Network Security Groups (NSGs), for instance, filter traffic to and from virtual machines at the network level, permitting or denying connections based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols. While NSGs are effective at reducing exposure to unwanted traffic, they cannot dynamically enforce time-bound access or provide detailed auditing of administrative activities. Azure Policy is designed to enforce configuration compliance for resources, ensuring that virtual machines and other services adhere to organizational standards. However, it does not manage who can access a VM or when that access occurs. Azure Key Vault, similarly, is essential for securely storing secrets, certificates, and encryption keys, but it does not provide mechanisms to control or log administrative access to virtual machines.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access addresses these gaps by combining access control, auditing, and operational efficiency in a single solution. By implementing temporary, time-limited access, organizations minimize the exposure of their virtual machines to potential attacks. The automatic closure of management ports after the allowed period reduces the risk of unauthorized logins and ensures that administrative privileges are granted only when necessary. The audit logs generated for each access request enable security teams to maintain accountability, detect unusual patterns, and provide evidence of compliance with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Alerts generated in response to abnormal activity further enhance the organization’s ability to respond quickly to potential threats.
In addition to security benefits, JIT VM Access supports operational efficiency. Administrators no longer need to maintain permanent open ports, reducing the administrative overhead associated with managing firewall rules or network configurations. The approval workflow for temporary access can be tailored to align with organizational processes, allowing teams to balance security with business needs. Integration with other Microsoft Defender for Cloud capabilities ensures that JIT access works alongside broader security monitoring and threat detection, providing a comprehensive, defense-in-depth approach to virtual machine protection.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access is an essential feature for controlling administrative access to Azure virtual machines. By keeping management ports closed until temporary access is requested and approved, it enforces least-privilege principles, minimizes the attack surface, and reduces the risk of unauthorized access. Audit logs, alerts, and time-bound sessions provide transparency, accountability, and proactive detection of suspicious activity. This approach not only strengthens security posture but also ensures operational efficiency and supports compliance with regulatory and organizational security standards, making JIT VM Access a critical component of a modern, secure Azure environment.
Question 115
You need to implement centralized monitoring, analysis, and automated response for security incidents across multiple Azure subscriptions. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Sentinel
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) solution that enables organizations to gain comprehensive visibility and control over their security posture across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Unlike traditional security tools that focus on isolated aspects of infrastructure protection, Sentinel aggregates data from a wide variety of sources, including Azure subscriptions, on-premises systems, and third-party services. By collecting logs, security events, and telemetry from these diverse environments, Sentinel provides security teams with a centralized platform for monitoring, analyzing, and responding to threats in real time.
One of the defining features of Microsoft Sentinel is its use of artificial intelligence and advanced analytics to detect anomalies and suspicious behavior. Rather than relying solely on static rules or manual investigation, Sentinel leverages machine learning to correlate events across different systems and identify patterns that may indicate malicious activity. For example, unusual login attempts, lateral movement between servers, or anomalous data access can be detected automatically, generating actionable alerts for security analysts. This intelligent correlation reduces false positives, enabling teams to focus on the most critical threats while minimizing alert fatigue.
In addition to threat detection, Sentinel provides powerful incident response capabilities through automated playbooks. These playbooks allow security teams to respond quickly and consistently to potential security events. For instance, when Sentinel detects a compromised account or resource, an automated workflow can immediately isolate the affected system, disable the compromised account, notify the appropriate personnel, and trigger additional remediation steps. By automating routine and critical responses, organizations can contain threats faster, reduce the risk of escalation, and free up security analysts to focus on more complex investigations.
While other Azure services contribute to security, they do not offer the same centralized monitoring and response capabilities as Microsoft Sentinel. Azure Key Vault is essential for securely storing and managing secrets, keys, and certificates, but it does not provide the ability to monitor security events or trigger automated responses. Network Security Groups (NSGs) are effective at filtering network traffic at the subnet or virtual machine level, yet they cannot detect anomalies, correlate events, or orchestrate incident response. Azure Policy is valuable for enforcing resource configuration compliance across an environment, but it does not provide real-time threat monitoring or security automation. These services are important components of an overall security strategy but cannot replace the comprehensive monitoring, correlation, and orchestration capabilities offered by Sentinel.
Microsoft Sentinel also enhances security operations by integrating with Microsoft Defender and other security tools. This integration expands detection coverage, providing additional insights into potential threats and enabling a more cohesive security approach across workloads. Analysts can leverage a single platform to investigate incidents, view related alerts, and coordinate responses across systems, creating a unified and efficient workflow. Compliance and auditing are also simplified because Sentinel maintains detailed logs of all detected events, responses, and investigations, providing organizations with the evidence required to demonstrate adherence to regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS.
The value of Microsoft Sentinel extends beyond reactive security measures. By analyzing historical data and detecting trends, Sentinel enables proactive threat hunting, helping organizations identify vulnerabilities and preempt potential attacks before they can cause damage. This proactive approach, combined with automated response and centralized visibility, strengthens the overall security posture and ensures that threats are addressed quickly and effectively.
Microsoft Sentinel is the ideal solution for organizations seeking a comprehensive, cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform. It centralizes security monitoring, threat detection, and incident response across hybrid environments, leveraging AI and advanced analytics to identify and correlate anomalies. Automated playbooks ensure rapid and consistent remediation, while integration with Microsoft Defender enhances detection capabilities. Detailed logging supports compliance, reduces alert fatigue, and enables proactive security operations. By consolidating monitoring, investigation, and response in a single platform, Sentinel strengthens organizational security, accelerates incident response, and provides confidence that threats are identified and mitigated in a timely and efficient manner.
Question 116
You need to ensure that only users on compliant devices can access corporate applications, and you want to require multi-factor authentication for risky sign-ins. Which solution should you implement?
A) Conditional Access with Intune compliance policies and risk-based MFA
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Conditional Access with Intune compliance policies and risk-based MFA
Explanation:
Conditional Access evaluates user identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals to enforce access policies. By integrating Microsoft Intune, administrators can require that devices meet compliance standards, such as encryption, OS patch level, and antivirus status, before accessing corporate applications. Risk-based policies trigger multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk sign-ins, including logins from unusual locations, unfamiliar devices, or atypical behavior.
Azure Key Vault secures cryptographic keys and secrets but does not enforce access policies or device compliance.
Network Security Groups filter network traffic but cannot enforce access based on device compliance or sign-in risk.
Azure Policy enforces resource compliance but does not manage user or device access or authentication policies.
Conditional Access with Intune compliance and risk-based MFA is the correct solution because it implements zero-trust security principles. Only authorized users on compliant devices gain access, and additional verification through MFA ensures that even compromised credentials do not provide unauthorized access. Logging and auditing provide visibility and compliance reporting. This approach strengthens the organization’s security posture, reduces the risk of account compromise, and ensures that sensitive applications are accessed securely in accordance with regulatory and organizational requirements.
Question 117
You need to enforce encryption for all Azure Storage accounts and monitor compliance across multiple subscriptions. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure Policy with encryption requirements
B) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Azure Policy with encryption requirements
Explanation:
Azure Policy is a cloud governance tool that enables administrators to define and enforce rules across Azure resources, ensuring that organizational standards and security requirements are consistently applied. One of the most important applications of Azure Policy is the enforcement of encryption for Azure Storage accounts. Encryption is a fundamental security control that protects data at rest, helping organizations safeguard sensitive information from unauthorized access or compromise. By implementing policies that require all storage accounts to be encrypted, administrators can prevent the deployment of unencrypted resources or automatically remediate non-compliant deployments, ensuring that all new and existing storage accounts adhere to organizational encryption standards.
Azure Policy provides the flexibility to create granular rules for individual resources, such as storage accounts, virtual machines, or databases. Beyond individual policies, Azure Policy supports initiatives, which are collections of multiple policies grouped together for centralized management. Initiatives simplify policy administration, particularly in large organizations or environments that span multiple subscriptions. By grouping related policies, administrators can enforce a consistent security and compliance framework across the entire environment, reducing the potential for configuration drift and ensuring that all resources meet required security standards.
A critical feature of Azure Policy is its compliance dashboards, which provide administrators with comprehensive visibility into the state of their resources. These dashboards allow teams to monitor which storage accounts are compliant with encryption policies and which are non-compliant across all subscriptions. This centralized monitoring capability enables proactive management of security posture, allowing administrators to identify gaps, take corrective action, and maintain oversight of all storage accounts within the organization. The dashboards also serve as a valuable tool for reporting and auditing, offering detailed insights that support compliance with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. By providing both operational and compliance visibility, Azure Policy helps organizations maintain accountability and governance over their resources.
While other Azure security services offer complementary capabilities, they do not provide the same level of enforcement and centralized governance as Azure Policy. Microsoft Defender for Cloud, for example, continuously monitors resources and provides security recommendations, such as identifying storage accounts without encryption. However, it does not prevent unencrypted storage accounts from being deployed nor automatically remediate non-compliant resources. Network Security Groups (NSGs) provide network-level protection by filtering inbound and outbound traffic, but they cannot enforce encryption or monitor compliance at the storage level. Similarly, Azure Key Vault securely stores encryption keys and secrets, ensuring the protection of cryptographic material, but it does not enforce storage account encryption policies or provide organization-wide compliance monitoring.
Azure Policy is the ideal solution for enforcing encryption because it combines enforcement, automation, and visibility. Policies can automatically remediate non-compliant resources, reducing the risk of sensitive data exposure. Compliance dashboards enable centralized monitoring across subscriptions, allowing administrators to quickly assess adherence to encryption standards and generate reports for audits or regulatory reviews. Initiatives simplify management of complex environments, ensuring that policies are applied consistently across all resources. Together, these capabilities strengthen security posture, reduce operational risk, and support regulatory compliance by ensuring that all storage accounts are encrypted and properly managed.
Azure Policy is a critical tool for maintaining consistent security standards and regulatory compliance across Azure environments. By enforcing encryption for storage accounts, providing automated remediation, offering centralized dashboards for monitoring, and supporting initiatives for grouping multiple policies, Azure Policy ensures that organizational requirements are consistently applied. This approach minimizes the risk of data breaches, enhances operational governance, supports audit readiness, and strengthens the overall security posture of the organization, making it an essential component of a comprehensive cloud security strategy.
Question 118
You need to detect suspicious sign-in activity in Azure AD, including impossible travel and unfamiliar locations, and respond automatically. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Azure Policy
C) Network Security Group
D) Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Answer: A) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Identity Protection is a specialized security service designed to safeguard organizational identities by detecting, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with user accounts. In modern cloud and hybrid environments, identities are among the most critical assets to protect because compromised credentials can allow attackers to access sensitive data, escalate privileges, and move laterally across systems. Azure AD Identity Protection addresses these risks by leveraging artificial intelligence, machine learning, and heuristic analysis to continuously monitor sign-in activity and identify potentially compromised accounts.
The service is capable of detecting a wide range of anomalies that may indicate identity threats. For example, it can identify impossible travel scenarios, where a user appears to sign in from geographically distant locations in a timeframe that is physically impossible. It can also detect unfamiliar sign-in locations, atypical patterns of access that deviate from normal behavior, and the use of credentials that have been exposed in known data breaches. By identifying these high-risk events, Azure AD Identity Protection enables administrators to take proactive steps before accounts are fully compromised. This real-time threat detection is particularly valuable in environments where users access applications from multiple devices and locations, making manual monitoring infeasible.
One of the key strengths of Azure AD Identity Protection is its ability to enforce automated responses to detected risks. Administrators can configure policies to require multi-factor authentication (MFA), initiate a password reset, or temporarily block access for accounts that exhibit suspicious behavior. These automated actions reduce the window of opportunity for attackers and ensure that potentially compromised accounts are addressed immediately, rather than waiting for manual intervention. By responding dynamically to identity risks, organizations can maintain operational continuity while mitigating the risk of unauthorized access.
Integration with Conditional Access further enhances the capabilities of Identity Protection. Conditional Access policies allow organizations to define access rules that adapt based on the risk level detected by Identity Protection. For instance, a user attempting to sign in from an unrecognized device or location may be required to complete additional verification steps, while low-risk sign-ins from trusted devices proceed without interruption. This adaptive access model aligns with zero-trust principles, which assume that no identity should be inherently trusted and that access should be continuously evaluated based on contextual factors such as device health, location, and sign-in behavior.
While other Azure security tools support different aspects of protection, they do not address identity risk in the same way. Azure Policy is useful for enforcing configuration standards and ensuring that resources comply with organizational rules, but it does not monitor user behavior or evaluate sign-in risks. Network Security Groups (NSGs) control traffic at the subnet or virtual machine level, yet they cannot analyze account activity or detect anomalies in authentication attempts. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers threat detection for workloads and resources, but it does not provide insight into identity-based threats or implement automated mitigation for risky accounts. These services complement Identity Protection but cannot replace its core functionality of proactive identity risk management.
Another advantage of Azure AD Identity Protection is the visibility it provides through auditing and reporting. All risk detections, policy enforcements, and automated actions are logged, giving administrators detailed insight into sign-in patterns and mitigation actions. These logs support compliance reporting and provide evidence for regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS. They also allow security teams to investigate incidents, identify trends in account compromise attempts, and refine risk policies over time.
Azure AD Identity Protection is a critical tool for securing organizational identities in the modern threat landscape. By detecting risky sign-ins and compromised accounts through AI-driven analytics and heuristics, enabling automated mitigation such as MFA or password resets, and integrating with Conditional Access for dynamic risk-based policies, it strengthens zero-trust security frameworks. Audit logs provide transparency and support compliance, while administrators can respond promptly to high-risk activity, reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access. This combination of proactive detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility ensures that only legitimate users gain access to resources, significantly enhancing overall security and protecting sensitive organizational data.
Question 119
You need to provide temporary administrative access to Azure virtual machines to reduce exposure to attacks. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
B) Network Security Group
C) Azure Policy
D) Azure Key Vault
Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access
Explanation:
Just-in-Time (JIT) VM Access, a feature of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, is designed to enhance the security of Azure virtual machines by controlling administrative access in a highly granular and time-bound manner. Traditionally, virtual machines exposed management ports, such as Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) or Secure Shell (SSH), continuously, which increased the attack surface and made VMs vulnerable to brute-force attempts, port scanning, and other unauthorized access attempts. JIT VM Access addresses these risks by keeping management ports closed by default and only opening them when access is explicitly requested and approved. This approach ensures that administrative privileges are granted strictly on a temporary basis, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers.
When an administrator requires access to a virtual machine, they submit a request through Microsoft Defender for Cloud. The request specifies the duration of access and the IP addresses from which the connection will be initiated. Access is granted for the requested time period and automatically revoked once the session expires, ensuring that the VM returns to a secure, baseline state. Every access request and session is logged, providing a comprehensive audit trail. These logs allow security teams to monitor administrative activity, verify that access adheres to organizational policies, and investigate suspicious behavior if necessary. This combination of temporary access and detailed logging is essential for enforcing least-privilege principles while maintaining accountability.
Other Azure services provide complementary security features but do not offer the same time-bound, access-controlled functionality as JIT VM Access. Network Security Groups (NSGs) can filter inbound and outbound traffic to virtual machines based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols. While NSGs help reduce exposure by limiting which sources can connect to a VM, they cannot enforce temporary access windows or dynamically open and close ports based on administrative requests. Azure Policy focuses on enforcing configuration compliance across resources, ensuring that virtual machines and other services meet organizational standards. However, it does not control who can access a VM or when such access occurs. Similarly, Azure Key Vault provides secure storage for secrets, certificates, and encryption keys, but it does not manage or log administrative access to virtual machines.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud JIT VM Access combines access control, operational efficiency, and auditability in a single solution. By granting only temporary, time-limited access to administrators, it minimizes the attack surface and ensures that management ports are not left open unnecessarily. Integration with alerts allows security teams to detect suspicious activity promptly, while audit logs provide the documentation necessary to support compliance with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001. This layered approach aligns with zero-trust principles, enforcing least-privilege access while allowing operational workflows to continue without compromising security.
Beyond security, JIT VM Access also supports operational efficiency. Administrators no longer need to maintain permanently open ports or manually manage firewall rules to accommodate occasional access. Automated approval workflows and time-limited sessions simplify the administrative process while maintaining strong security standards. When combined with other Microsoft Defender for Cloud capabilities, JIT VM Access integrates seamlessly into a broader security strategy that includes threat detection, vulnerability management, and incident response, providing organizations with a comprehensive defense-in-depth framework.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Just-in-Time VM Access is a critical feature for securing Azure virtual machines. By keeping management ports closed until temporary access is requested and approved, it enforces least-privilege principles, reduces exposure to unauthorized access, and ensures that administrative activity is logged and auditable. The integration with alerts and security monitoring enables rapid detection of suspicious behavior, supporting proactive threat management. This approach strengthens organizational security, reduces risk, and ensures compliance, making JIT VM Access an essential component of modern cloud security practices.
Question 120
You need to implement centralized monitoring, threat detection, and automated response across multiple Azure subscriptions. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Sentinel
B) Azure Key Vault
C) Network Security Group
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platform designed to provide organizations with centralized visibility and control over their security operations. Unlike traditional monitoring solutions, which often require separate tools for log collection, analysis, and incident response, Sentinel combines these capabilities in a single, unified environment. It collects and aggregates security logs and telemetry from a wide range of sources, including Azure subscriptions, on-premises systems, and third-party services, ensuring comprehensive coverage across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. By centralizing this data, Sentinel enables organizations to gain a holistic view of their security posture and respond to potential threats quickly and efficiently.
A key strength of Microsoft Sentinel lies in its ability to leverage AI-driven analytics to detect anomalies, correlate events, and produce actionable alerts. Rather than relying solely on static rules or manual monitoring, Sentinel applies machine learning algorithms to identify patterns that may indicate malicious activity. For instance, it can detect unusual login behaviors, suspicious network traffic, or abnormal access to critical resources. Event correlation further enhances detection by linking related alerts into a single incident, reducing noise and enabling analysts to focus on the most significant threats. This intelligent approach not only improves detection accuracy but also helps reduce alert fatigue, which is a common challenge for security operations teams managing large volumes of events.
In addition to detecting threats, Microsoft Sentinel offers advanced automation capabilities through its playbooks. Playbooks allow security teams to define automated response workflows that are triggered when specific alerts or incidents occur. For example, if Sentinel identifies a compromised account, a playbook can automatically disable the account, isolate affected resources, notify the appropriate personnel, and perform additional remediation steps. This automation ensures that incidents are addressed immediately, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers and minimizing potential damage. By integrating detection and response in a single platform, Sentinel accelerates incident handling and improves overall operational efficiency.
Other Azure services provide valuable security functions but do not offer the same level of centralized monitoring, analytics, and automated response as Sentinel. Azure Key Vault is critical for protecting secrets, keys, and certificates but does not monitor security events or respond to incidents. Network Security Groups (NSGs) control network traffic at the subnet or virtual machine level but cannot analyze logs, correlate events, or orchestrate responses to threats. Azure Policy enforces compliance and resource configuration standards but does not provide real-time threat monitoring or automated incident response capabilities. While these tools contribute to an overall security strategy, they are not designed to provide the comprehensive SIEM and SOAR functionality that Sentinel delivers.
Integration with Microsoft Defender further enhances Sentinel’s capabilities by providing additional data sources and insights for more accurate threat detection. Analysts can investigate alerts, correlate multiple events into a coherent incident, and initiate automated remediation actions directly from the Sentinel portal. All actions are logged, creating a robust audit trail that supports compliance reporting and regulatory requirements. By centralizing monitoring, investigation, and response, Sentinel strengthens security operations and enables organizations to maintain a proactive security posture, identifying and addressing threats before they escalate.
Microsoft Sentinel is the ideal solution for organizations seeking a cloud-native platform that combines threat detection, incident investigation, and automated response. Its ability to collect and analyze logs from diverse sources, detect anomalies with AI-driven analytics, and respond automatically through playbooks makes it an essential tool for modern security operations. Integration with Microsoft Defender, event correlation, and comprehensive auditing capabilities further enhance Sentinel’s value, ensuring that organizations can respond to security incidents quickly, reduce alert fatigue, and maintain compliance. By providing centralized visibility and automation, Microsoft Sentinel strengthens the overall security posture and ensures timely, effective protection across hybrid and cloud environments.