Microsoft AZ-140 Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q31-45
Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-140 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 31
You need to deploy a new Azure Virtual Desktop host pool and ensure that all session hosts receive the same configuration automatically. Which deployment method should you use?
A) Manual VM creation
B) Azure Resource Manager (ARM) template
C) Remote Desktop client
D) Windows Admin Center
Answer: B) Azure Resource Manager (ARM) template
Explanation:
ARM templates allow administrators to define infrastructure as code for Azure resources. By creating an ARM template, you can specify the host pool, session host VMs, network configurations, storage accounts, and other settings. When the template is deployed, all session hosts are created with consistent configurations automatically, ensuring standardization and reducing the chance of errors that can occur with manual deployments. ARM templates can also integrate with deployment pipelines for continuous integration, making them scalable and repeatable across environments.
Manual VM creation allows administrators to deploy session hosts individually. While it provides flexibility, it is prone to misconfiguration, inconsistent settings, and increased operational overhead. Manual deployment does not scale well in large environments.
The Remote Desktop client is used for accessing desktops and applications after deployment. It cannot provision or configure session hosts, so it does not meet the requirement for automated, consistent host deployment.
Windows Admin Center provides tools for managing Windows servers and VMs, but it is primarily a management tool rather than a deployment automation solution. It does not offer the repeatable, code-based deployment capabilities of ARM templates.
Using an ARM template ensures that every session host in the host pool receives the same configuration, simplifies future updates, and supports automation and repeatability, making it the correct choice.
Question 32
You want to implement a security solution to protect sensitive user data in Azure Virtual Desktop profiles. Which solution should you use?
A) FSLogix Profile Containers with encryption
B) Azure Key Vault alone
C) Azure Firewall
D) Azure Bastion
Answer: A) FSLogix Profile Containers with encryption
Explanation:
FSLogix Profile Containers provide a robust solution for managing user profiles in virtualized environments, particularly for deployments like Azure Virtual Desktop. One of the key strengths of FSLogix is its ability to store user profiles in virtual hard disks, either VHD or VHDX format. These disks can be configured with encryption at rest, which ensures that all sensitive data contained within the user profile is protected. This includes personal documents, application settings, desktop preferences, and other user-specific data. By encrypting the profile containers, FSLogix ensures that even if the storage medium is compromised, the contents remain secure and unreadable to unauthorized users. This approach combines security with performance, maintaining fast login times and a seamless experience for users in multi-session environments.
The encryption feature in FSLogix is particularly important in scenarios where organizations handle sensitive information or need to comply with regulatory standards. By securing profiles directly on the storage level, FSLogix provides a layer of protection that safeguards both data integrity and confidentiality. This is crucial in multi-session deployments, where multiple users may be accessing different virtual desktops hosted on the same infrastructure. Without proper encryption, there is a risk that sensitive information could be exposed, either through misconfigured access controls or potential storage-level vulnerabilities.
While FSLogix addresses the security of the user profile itself, other Azure services focus on different aspects of cloud security. For example, Azure Key Vault is designed to store and protect secrets, cryptographic keys, and certificates. It excels at managing sensitive credentials and ensuring secure access to cryptographic materials, but it does not extend its protection to full user profiles or application data stored on session hosts. Using Key Vault alone will not secure the personal or application-specific data contained within Azure Virtual Desktop profiles.
Similarly, Azure Firewall enhances security by filtering inbound and outbound network traffic. It acts as a barrier against unauthorized access and potential attacks, ensuring that only approved traffic can reach the virtual environment. While this strengthens the network perimeter, it does not encrypt the contents of user profiles or protect data at rest. The firewall safeguards the network, not the profile itself.
Azure Bastion is another service that provides secure connectivity, enabling RDP and SSH access to Azure virtual machines without exposing public IP addresses. This improves access security and reduces the risk of external attacks. However, Bastion does not offer encryption for the data stored in user profiles, nor does it provide any mechanisms for protecting profile integrity or confidentiality.
By using FSLogix with encryption, organizations can directly secure user profiles within Azure Virtual Desktop. This approach ensures that all user-specific data, settings, and application configurations remain protected while maintaining the fast, consistent login experience that multi-session environments demand. FSLogix effectively addresses both security and performance needs, making it the ideal solution for organizations looking to safeguard sensitive profile data in a virtual desktop infrastructure. Its combination of encrypted profile storage, centralized management, and high performance makes FSLogix the most comprehensive solution for securing user profiles in Azure Virtual Desktop deployments.
Question 33
You need to deploy a pooled host pool for 100 users, minimizing infrastructure costs while ensuring performance. Which VM type should you select?
A) B-series
B) D-series
C) NV-series
D) A-series
Answer: A) B-series
Explanation:
B-series virtual machines in Azure are designed as burstable, cost-effective compute resources, specifically intended for workloads that experience variable CPU demands rather than sustained high utilization. They are an ideal choice for environments where users do not require consistent maximum processing power but occasionally need bursts of CPU capacity to handle peak workloads. In the context of a pooled host pool with 100 users, B-series VMs provide a practical solution by allowing CPU resources to scale up temporarily during high-demand periods, such as during morning logins or simultaneous application launches, while consuming minimal resources during off-peak hours. This capability helps organizations control costs without compromising user experience, making them particularly well-suited for general-purpose applications and virtual desktop infrastructure scenarios with predictable, intermittent spikes in workload.
The key advantage of B-series is their burstable performance model, which leverages accumulated credits when the VM is underutilized. These credits can then be spent during periods of high CPU demand, ensuring that session hosts can handle short-term workload peaks effectively. For a medium-sized pooled host pool with fluctuating user activity, this translates into fast logins and responsive application performance during busy periods without the continuous expense of a consistently high-performing VM. The cost savings of B-series are substantial, especially when deployed at scale, because organizations only pay for sustained baseline performance and occasional bursts, rather than for full-time, high-capacity machines.
Other VM series in Azure may not be as efficient for this type of workload. D-series VMs, for example, offer a balanced mix of CPU and memory resources designed for steady, more predictable workloads. While D-series machines provide strong and consistent performance, they are generally more expensive than B-series VMs. Deploying D-series in a pooled host pool with variable and burstable user activity may result in unnecessary cost overhead, as the additional consistent performance capacity is not fully utilized during off-peak times.
NV-series VMs are optimized for workloads requiring GPU acceleration, such as computer-aided design, 3D rendering, video processing, or other graphics-intensive applications. While these machines deliver exceptional performance for specialized use cases, they come with significantly higher costs. For standard office applications or general desktop workloads within a pooled host pool, NV-series machines would be excessive and economically inefficient.
A-series VMs represent a legacy option for general-purpose workloads. Although they may still be available for certain applications, they lack the performance efficiency and cost optimization features of more modern VM series. They are not well-suited for current virtual desktop deployments where performance, scalability, and cost efficiency are critical.
Considering the trade-offs between performance and cost, B-series VMs provide the most suitable balance for a pooled host pool with 100 users that experiences moderate, burstable workloads. They ensure that users have sufficient resources during peak activity while keeping operational costs manageable during off-peak periods. The combination of burstable CPU performance, cost efficiency, and suitability for general-purpose applications makes B-series the most effective choice for this scenario, delivering both operational performance and financial efficiency for organizations deploying Azure Virtual Desktop environments.
Question 34
You want to ensure that session hosts are automatically updated with the latest Windows patches without impacting users. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure Update Management
B) Manual patching via RDP
C) Windows Admin Center only
D) FSLogix profile containers
Answer: A) Azure Update Management
Explanation:
Azure Update Management is a robust solution for automating and scheduling updates for both Windows and Linux virtual machines in Azure environments. Within the context of Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD), Update Management allows administrators to efficiently manage patching across multiple session hosts while minimizing disruption to end users. One of its key benefits is the ability to define maintenance windows and deployment schedules, ensuring that updates are applied when users are not actively working. This means that session hosts remain up to date with the latest security patches and feature updates, without impacting productivity or causing unexpected downtime. By automating the update process, organizations can maintain both security and operational continuity across their AVD environment.
The automation provided by Azure Update Management is particularly valuable in environments with multiple session hosts. Applying updates manually in such environments is labor-intensive and inefficient. For example, using Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) to log into each VM individually and install patches is not only time-consuming but also prone to human error. This approach can lead to inconsistencies in patch levels between session hosts and increases the risk of downtime for users if updates require system restarts during active sessions. Manual patching is impractical for large-scale deployments, where coordinating updates across dozens or hundreds of virtual machines would demand significant administrative effort.
Alternative tools, such as Windows Admin Center, offer patch management and monitoring capabilities for individual servers. While it is useful for maintaining smaller environments or a few standalone servers, it does not scale efficiently for managing multiple AVD session hosts. Windows Admin Center lacks the deep integration with Azure’s scheduling and automation capabilities, which means administrators must still perform many tasks manually. Additionally, it does not provide native support for non-disruptive update deployment in multi-user, multi-host scenarios, making it less suitable for virtual desktop environments where uptime is critical.
FSLogix profile containers, while an essential component for managing user profiles in AVD, are unrelated to system maintenance or patching. They efficiently store and manage user data across session hosts, ensuring consistent profiles and fast logins, but they do not offer any functionality for applying security updates or operating system patches. Relying solely on FSLogix for system management would leave session hosts vulnerable to security risks and compliance gaps.
In contrast, Azure Update Management provides a centralized, scalable solution that addresses the challenges of maintaining large virtual desktop deployments. Administrators can configure update schedules, deploy patches automatically, and track compliance across all session hosts. By leveraging maintenance windows, organizations can ensure that updates are applied at times when user activity is minimal, avoiding disruptions to productivity. This combination of automation, scheduling, and non-disruptive deployment ensures that session hosts remain secure, compliant, and fully operational.
Ultimately, Azure Update Management is the most effective solution for maintaining the health and security of Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts. It eliminates the inefficiencies and risks associated with manual patching, scales across multiple hosts, and integrates seamlessly with Azure services to provide consistent, automated, and non-disruptive updates. By implementing Update Management, organizations can maintain a secure, reliable, and high-performing virtual desktop environment while minimizing the administrative burden on IT staff.
Question 35
You need to allow users to access Azure Virtual Desktop from mobile devices and web browsers without installing additional software. Which access method should you implement?
A) HTML5 web client
B) Remote Desktop client for Windows only
C) Azure Bastion
D) Windows Admin Center
Answer: A) HTML5 web client
Explanation:
The HTML5 web client provides browser-based access to Azure Virtual Desktop, enabling users to connect to full desktops or RemoteApp applications from any device with a supported browser. This solution removes the need to install the Remote Desktop client, making access simple and flexible for mobile users, tablets, or public computers. It supports secure connections and works across multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android.
Remote Desktop client for Windows only provides access to AVD but requires installation on the device, limiting flexibility and making it less suitable for mobile or unmanaged devices.
Azure Bastion provides secure RDP/SSH access to Azure VMs, primarily for administrative management, not for delivering AVD desktops or applications to end users.
Windows Admin Center is a management tool for servers and VMs. It does not provide interactive desktop or RemoteApp access to end users.
The HTML5 web client is specifically designed for flexible, clientless access to Azure Virtual Desktop environments, making it the correct solution.
Question 36
You need to provide users with persistent desktops where their data and settings are maintained across sessions. Which host pool type should you deploy?
A) Personal host pool
B) Pooled host pool
C) RemoteApp programs
D) FSLogix container
Answer: A) Personal host pool
Explanation:
In virtual desktop infrastructure, selecting the appropriate type of host pool is essential for meeting user requirements for performance, customization, and persistence. Pooled host pools, one common deployment model, allow multiple users to share the same session host virtual machine. This approach is cost-effective because a single VM can serve multiple users simultaneously, optimizing resource utilization. However, pooled host pools have inherent limitations when it comes to persistence. Because multiple users share the same session host, any changes made to system settings, desktop configurations, or installed applications may not persist after a user logs off. At the end of a session, user-specific changes can be lost, which means that this model is unsuitable for scenarios where users require a stable, personalized environment that retains their data and customizations across sessions.
RemoteApp programs offer a different approach by publishing individual applications rather than providing access to a full virtual desktop. Users can launch and use specific applications from their local devices while the applications run on remote session hosts. RemoteApp is particularly useful for organizations where users only need access to certain programs rather than a complete desktop environment. However, this method also has limitations. Because users do not have a full desktop environment, they cannot save personalized desktop layouts, configure system-wide settings, or maintain installed applications across sessions. RemoteApp is therefore ideal for task-specific use cases but does not meet the requirements for users who need a persistent and fully customizable desktop.
FSLogix profile containers address part of the challenge by providing a mechanism to manage and maintain user profiles across multiple session hosts. By storing user profiles in virtual hard disks, either VHD or VHDX format, FSLogix ensures that user settings, application configurations, and personal files remain consistent even in pooled host environments. This significantly improves logon speed and delivers a seamless experience when users connect to different session hosts. Despite these advantages, FSLogix does not provide full virtual machine persistence. While it preserves user profiles, it does not retain the entire desktop state, installed applications, or system-level customizations. Therefore, while FSLogix enhances profile consistency and speeds up user logins, it cannot replace a dedicated, persistent desktop environment for users who need one.
Personal host pools provide a solution that addresses the limitations of pooled host pools, RemoteApp, and FSLogix alone. In a personal host pool, each user is assigned a dedicated virtual machine. This ensures that the desktop environment, including installed applications, user settings, and personal data, is persistent and remains intact across multiple sessions. Users benefit from a consistent and familiar workspace, which is particularly important for roles that rely on customized software configurations, specialized applications, or ongoing projects that require continuity. Personal host pools are therefore the optimal choice for scenarios where full desktop persistence is essential, balancing both user experience and operational control.
By providing dedicated, persistent desktops, personal host pools ensure that both system-level and user-level configurations remain intact. This makes them the most appropriate choice for users who need stability, customization, and continuity in their virtual desktop environments. They effectively combine the benefits of profile persistence with full VM dedication, offering a comprehensive solution for organizations with users who cannot rely on shared or transient desktops.
Question 37
You need to reduce login times for users with large profiles in a pooled Azure Virtual Desktop host pool. Which solution should you implement?
A) FSLogix Profile Containers
B) Roaming Profiles
C) OneDrive for Business
D) Azure Files
Answer: A) FSLogix Profile Containers
Explanation:
FSLogix Profile Containers are designed to optimize user profile management in virtual desktop environments, particularly for multi-session deployments such as Azure Virtual Desktop. They store each user’s profile within a virtual hard disk, either VHD or VHDX, which is mounted dynamically to the session host at the time of login. This approach eliminates the need to copy large amounts of profile data across the network during sign-in, a process that can significantly slow down logon times in traditional profile management systems. By attaching the profile dynamically, FSLogix allows users to access their desktops quickly and efficiently, reducing delays and improving overall productivity. The technology also ensures that user settings, application configurations, and personal data remain consistent across different session hosts, so users experience the same environment regardless of which virtual machine they connect to.
One of the primary advantages of FSLogix is its optimization for cloud-based, multi-session environments like Azure Virtual Desktop. In these environments, users often connect to different session hosts during different login sessions. Without a mechanism like FSLogix, maintaining a consistent profile across multiple hosts can be challenging. FSLogix addresses this by centralizing the profile in a virtual disk that can be accessed from any host, providing a seamless and reliable experience. It also integrates well with Office 365 applications and standard Windows profiles, ensuring that settings and data are efficiently managed without introducing delays during login.
In contrast, traditional Roaming Profiles attempt to copy a user’s profile from one session host to another during both login and logout. While this method can work in smaller or on-premises environments, it is not well-suited for modern cloud-based deployments. Large profiles can take several minutes—or even longer—to copy, leading to slow logons and logouts. Additionally, Roaming Profiles are prone to errors, data inconsistencies, and conflicts when multiple session hosts are involved, which can frustrate users and increase administrative overhead. They are not optimized for Azure Virtual Desktop or other cloud-hosted environments, making them a less effective solution for organizations with multi-session workloads.
Other solutions, such as OneDrive for Business and Azure Files, focus primarily on file storage rather than full profile management. OneDrive for Business provides cloud-based file synchronization, allowing users to store and access documents from multiple devices. While this helps with document availability and backup, it does not manage user settings, application data, or other elements of the Windows profile. Consequently, it does not address slow logins or ensure consistency of the desktop environment across different session hosts. Similarly, Azure Files offers network shares that can store user data, but accessing large profiles over a network share can actually increase login times in multi-session scenarios. These solutions are useful for file access but do not replace a robust profile management system.
FSLogix Profile Containers directly target the issues associated with large, multi-session user profiles. By dynamically mounting virtual disks at login, FSLogix reduces login delays, ensures profile consistency across session hosts, and provides a scalable solution for cloud-based virtual desktops. This combination of speed, reliability, and centralized profile management makes FSLogix the ideal choice for organizations looking to improve user experience and operational efficiency in Azure Virtual Desktop deployments. It is the most effective solution for handling large profiles while maintaining a consistent, seamless desktop experience for users across multiple session hosts.
Question 38
You need to provide Azure Virtual Desktop users access to specific applications without giving full desktop access. Which deployment method should you use?
A) RemoteApp programs
B) Personal host pool
C) Pooled host pool
D) ARM template
Answer: A) RemoteApp programs
Explanation:
RemoteApp programs offer a targeted approach to application delivery in virtual desktop environments by allowing administrators to publish individual applications to users rather than providing a full desktop experience. This approach is particularly useful in scenarios where users only require access to specific applications for their work. By delivering only the necessary applications, RemoteApp programs help minimize security risks because users do not interact with the underlying operating system or other applications on the host. Limiting exposure in this way reduces the potential attack surface, ensuring a more secure environment for both the user and the organization. Additionally, focusing on application-level access can optimize resource usage, since virtual machines do not need to allocate resources for full desktop environments, allowing better performance and scalability.
Users can access RemoteApp programs through familiar interfaces such as the Remote Desktop client or an HTML5 web client. This flexibility ensures that users can seamlessly launch applications from virtually any device without the complexity or overhead of managing a full desktop. RemoteApp delivers the benefits of virtualization—centralized management, simplified updates, and easier compliance—while maintaining a lightweight user experience. Because users do not receive full desktop access, they are restricted to only what they need, which can prevent accidental misconfigurations or misuse of system resources. This targeted delivery model is ideal for knowledge workers, administrative staff, or any group whose workflow centers around one or a few key applications rather than a comprehensive desktop environment.
Other virtual desktop deployment options provide broader functionality but are less suitable for scenarios requiring application-only access. Personal host pools, for example, assign a dedicated virtual machine to each user. This ensures that each desktop is persistent, retaining user settings, installed applications, and personal files across sessions. While this level of persistence is valuable for users who need a customized, stable workspace, it exceeds the needs of users who only require access to specific applications. Delivering full desktops in such cases can result in unnecessary resource consumption and potentially increase the complexity of management and security.
Pooled host pools offer another deployment model in which multiple users share the same session host virtual machines. This approach is more cost-effective than dedicated personal desktops because it consolidates resources, but pooled host pools still provide full desktop access by default. Without combining them with RemoteApp, users receive access to an entire virtual desktop, which again may be more than what is required and can introduce additional security or management considerations.
ARM templates, on the other hand, are tools for automating the deployment of Azure resources. While extremely useful for scaling, standardizing, and managing virtual desktop environments, ARM templates do not control how applications are presented to end users. They are designed for provisioning and infrastructure automation, not for restricting access to specific applications.
RemoteApp programs deliver a solution tailored to application-level access. They ensure that users have access only to the applications they need, without exposing the full desktop environment. This reduces risk, improves security, optimizes resource usage, and provides a streamlined user experience, making RemoteApp the most appropriate choice for scenarios where users require access to individual applications rather than a complete virtual desktop.
Question 39
You want to allow users to log in to Azure Virtual Desktop from unmanaged devices only if multi-factor authentication is used. Which feature should you configure?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Azure RBAC
C) Network Security Groups
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: A) Azure AD Conditional Access
Explanation:
Azure AD Conditional Access is a powerful security feature that enables organizations to enforce granular access controls based on a combination of factors, including user identity, device compliance, geographic location, and authentication requirements. This capability is particularly important in environments like Azure Virtual Desktop, where users may attempt to access virtual desktops from a variety of devices and locations. By implementing Conditional Access policies, administrators can ensure that only authorized users on trusted and compliant devices can access sensitive resources. Additionally, these policies can require additional verification steps, such as multi-factor authentication, when a user is accessing resources from an unmanaged or potentially insecure device. This layered approach significantly enhances security by combining both user verification and device trust, helping to prevent unauthorized access.
One of the key scenarios for Conditional Access is controlling access from unmanaged devices. These are devices that are not registered or compliant with an organization’s management policies, which may lack proper security configurations or be more susceptible to compromise. With Conditional Access, administrators can require that users on unmanaged devices complete multi-factor authentication before they are granted access to Azure Virtual Desktop. This ensures that even if the device itself cannot be fully trusted, the identity of the user is verified through an additional authentication step. By applying these controls, organizations can maintain a strong security posture without entirely blocking remote access, balancing usability and protection.
While Conditional Access focuses on identity and device-based conditions, other Azure security tools serve different purposes. Azure Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), for instance, is used to define and manage permissions for users and groups within Azure. RBAC specifies who can perform certain actions on Azure resources, such as creating, modifying, or deleting resources. However, RBAC does not enforce authentication requirements or device compliance conditions. It determines access rights but does not evaluate the context of the access attempt, such as whether the user is signing in from a secure, compliant device.
Network Security Groups (NSGs) provide another layer of protection, but their scope is different. NSGs filter inbound and outbound network traffic to Azure resources based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols. While NSGs help control network access and limit exposure to threats, they operate solely at the network level and cannot enforce identity-based access policies, multi-factor authentication, or device compliance checks. Similarly, Azure Firewall provides centralized network protection by monitoring and filtering traffic across Azure virtual networks, offering features like threat intelligence and application-level filtering. While it strengthens the network perimeter, Azure Firewall does not have the capability to enforce per-user authentication requirements or evaluate device trust.
Conditional Access is unique in its ability to combine user identity, device state, location, and authentication factors to enforce security policies at the point of access. It provides a flexible and scalable way to ensure that only trusted users on secure devices can access Azure Virtual Desktop resources. By integrating multi-factor authentication and evaluating device compliance, Conditional Access helps organizations mitigate risks associated with unmanaged devices while maintaining a smooth and secure user experience. This makes it the most appropriate solution for securing access from devices that cannot be fully trusted.
Question 40
You need to monitor Azure Virtual Desktop session host performance and receive alerts when CPU usage exceeds thresholds. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Monitor
B) Remote Desktop client
C) Windows Admin Center
D) Log Analytics workspace only
Answer: A) Azure Monitor
Explanation:
Azure Monitor plays a central role in observing and analyzing the performance of Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts by gathering detailed metrics and logs from each machine. It continuously collects data such as CPU usage, memory consumption, disk activity, and network performance. This constant flow of information provides administrators with a clear understanding of how their environment is operating at any given time. By setting up custom alerts within Azure Monitor, teams can be immediately informed when specific thresholds are reached, such as sustained high CPU utilization or memory pressure. These alerts allow organizations to respond quickly to potential issues before they impact user experience. In addition to real-time monitoring, Azure Monitor integrates closely with Log Analytics, enabling long-term data storage and deep analysis. This connection supports historical reporting, trend identification, and capacity planning across large or distributed environments. Because of its consolidated dashboards and alerting capabilities, Azure Monitor stands out as a comprehensive solution for multi-host performance monitoring in Azure Virtual Desktop deployments.
In contrast, the Remote Desktop client serves an entirely different purpose. Its primary function is to allow users to connect to virtual desktops or published applications. While it successfully delivers a smooth user interface for accessing remote resources, it does not provide any monitoring, reporting, or alerting functionality. The Remote Desktop client cannot collect performance metrics or analyze session host health. It also lacks the capability to track data across numerous hosts or notify administrators of emerging performance issues. Its role is limited to access and interaction, not management or oversight.
Windows Admin Center offers useful tools for managing and monitoring individual Windows servers or virtual machines. It enables administrators to perform tasks such as viewing event logs, managing updates, or checking resource usage on a local level. However, this tool is designed for direct machine management rather than large-scale, centralized monitoring. It does not provide unified dashboards, alerts, or aggregated insights across multiple Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts. This makes it less appropriate for organizations that require consolidated oversight of performance across many machines within a distributed environment.
A Log Analytics workspace functions as a repository for logs and metrics, allowing the execution of advanced queries to extract insights from stored data. It supports analyzing resource performance, security events, and diagnostic information. Yet, on its own, a Log Analytics workspace does not produce alerts or provide built-in visual monitoring dashboards. These capabilities only become fully available when the workspace is paired with Azure Monitor, which transforms the raw data into actionable insights through visualization, alert rules, and automated responses.
Overall, Azure Monitor combines the capabilities needed for complete, centralized performance monitoring, offering administrators visibility across all session hosts and the ability to respond instantly to performance concerns. It integrates metrics collection, log analysis, dashboard visualization, and alerting into a single solution. This holistic approach makes it the most suitable choice for tracking the health and performance of Azure Virtual Desktop environments and ensuring that administrators receive timely notifications when important thresholds are exceeded.
Question 41
You need to deploy Azure Virtual Desktop session hosts that can automatically join a host pool when created. Which method should you use?
A) Registration token
B) Custom script extension
C) User-assigned managed identity
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Registration token
Explanation:
A registration token is a unique key used to authenticate session hosts to a specific host pool. When deploying session hosts through ARM templates, VM scale sets, or manually, including the registration token allows the VM to automatically register with the correct host pool without manual intervention. This ensures that hosts are immediately recognized and available for user connections after deployment. Automated registration reduces errors, streamlines deployment, and supports scalability in enterprise environments.
Custom script extensions can execute scripts on virtual machines after deployment, but they cannot substitute the registration token. Scripts alone do not provide the authentication mechanism required for a session host to join a host pool.
User-assigned managed identities allow a VM to access other Azure resources securely without storing credentials, but they do not handle session host registration. While useful for accessing Key Vault, storage accounts, or other resources, managed identities do not replace the need for the registration token in AVD.
Azure Policy ensures that resources comply with organizational rules and standards. It can enforce configurations such as VM size or naming conventions but does not enable session host registration with host pools. It is primarily a governance tool rather than an authentication mechanism.
Using a registration token is the correct approach because it directly enables session hosts to authenticate with the host pool automatically, ensuring consistent and efficient deployment.
Question 42
You want to restrict Azure Virtual Desktop access to devices that meet your organization’s security standards. Which feature should you configure?
A) Conditional Access
B) Azure Firewall
C) Network Security Groups
D) Role-Based Access Control
Answer: A) Conditional Access
Explanation:
Conditional Access evaluates multiple conditions—such as device compliance, location, user risk, and authentication strength—before granting access to Azure Virtual Desktop. By configuring a policy, administrators can block access from non-compliant devices, ensuring that only approved, secure endpoints can connect. Conditional Access also integrates with Intune to verify device compliance and supports multi-factor authentication, providing comprehensive access control.
Azure Firewall filters network traffic and provides network security but does not evaluate device compliance or enforce authentication policies. It operates at the network layer rather than the identity and access layer.
Network Security Groups control inbound and outbound traffic to Azure resources. They cannot evaluate device state, compliance, or user authentication conditions. NSGs focus on traffic control rather than access policies.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) manages permissions for Azure resources. While it defines “who” can access resources and what actions they can take, it does not enforce conditional policies based on device compliance or session requirements.
Conditional Access is purpose-built for enforcing access conditions based on device security and compliance, making it the correct solution for secure AVD access.
Question 43
You want to deploy session hosts for users with GPU-intensive workloads in Azure Virtual Desktop. Which VM series is most suitable?
A) NV-series
B) B-series
C) D-series
D) A-series
Answer: A) NV-series
Explanation:
NV-series VMs are designed specifically for GPU-intensive workloads such as 3D rendering, CAD applications, AI workloads, and visualization tasks. They provide dedicated NVIDIA GPUs for high-performance graphics processing, ensuring smooth performance for users requiring intensive graphical computing. NV-series ensures that multi-session AVD users running graphics-heavy applications experience responsive performance and stability.
B-series VMs are burstable general-purpose VMs that are cost-efficient but do not provide dedicated GPU resources. They are suitable for light workloads but cannot meet the demands of GPU-intensive applications.
D-series VMs provide a balance of CPU and memory for general workloads. While they offer consistent performance, they lack GPU capabilities, making them unsuitable for graphics-heavy applications.
A-series are legacy general-purpose VMs that are not optimized for modern GPU workloads. They are less efficient and do not provide hardware acceleration required for graphics-intensive tasks.
NV-series is the correct choice because it delivers the GPU resources and performance required for high-demand graphical workloads in Azure Virtual Desktop.
Question 44
You want to ensure that session hosts automatically scale up during peak usage and scale down during off-peak hours. Which feature should you implement?
A) Autoscale for host pools
B) Azure Monitor Alerts
C) Azure Advisor
D) Azure Policy
Answer: A) Autoscale for host pools
Explanation:
Autoscale for host pools allows administrators to define scaling rules based on active user sessions, schedules, or performance metrics. It automatically starts additional session hosts during periods of high demand and deallocates unused hosts during off-peak hours. This approach reduces operational costs while ensuring sufficient capacity for users, optimizing resource utilization, and improving user experience without manual intervention.
Azure Monitor Alerts can notify administrators when thresholds are exceeded but do not perform automated scaling. Alerts are reactive, requiring additional automation to respond to load changes.
Azure Advisor provides recommendations for cost optimization and performance improvements but does not directly scale resources. It only offers guidance, which still requires manual implementation.
Azure Policy enforces compliance rules and organizational standards but cannot dynamically scale session hosts. It is designed for governance rather than automated resource management.
Autoscale for host pools is the correct solution because it automatically manages session host availability and cost efficiency based on real-time demand.
Question 45
You need to provide clientless access to Azure Virtual Desktop for users on mobile devices or public computers. Which method should you implement?
A) HTML5 web client
B) Remote Desktop client for Windows only
C) Azure Bastion
D) Windows Admin Center
Answer: A) HTML5 web client
Explanation:
The HTML5 web client enables users to access Azure Virtual Desktop desktops and RemoteApp programs directly from a web browser without installing any client software. This clientless access works across Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android devices, providing flexibility and convenience for mobile users or public computers. Users can securely connect from any device with a supported browser, making deployment and access management simpler for administrators.
Remote Desktop client for Windows requires installation on the device and does not support clientless access. It limits cross-platform access and increases administrative overhead for client deployment.
Azure Bastion provides secure RDP/SSH connectivity to VMs over SSL but is intended for administrative purposes, not end-user access to AVD desktops or applications.
Windows Admin Center is a management tool for servers and VMs. It does not provide interactive desktop or application access for end users.
The HTML5 web client is designed specifically for clientless, flexible access to Azure Virtual Desktop, making it the correct solution.