Google Associate Cloud Engineer Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 1 Q1-15

Visit here for our full Google Associate Cloud Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 1

You deployed a new application to a Compute Engine instance using a custom startup script. However, after rebooting the instance, the application fails to start. What is the most likely reason?

A) The startup script was not stored in a metadata key designated for startup operations
B) The application binaries were not compiled using Google Cloud SDK tools
C) The Compute Engine VM requires a public IP for startup scripts to execute
D) Startup scripts only run the very first time an instance boots

Answer: A

Explanation:

The way virtual machines in a cloud platform handle configuration and initialization scripts depends on metadata. The mechanism that triggers scripts to run every time a virtual machine boots is driven by metadata keys. When a script is added to a metadata key specifically created for startup tasks, it is executed at each boot event. Without this association, the script will not run after a reboot, and the intended automation will fail.

The idea that application binaries must be compiled with a specific set of tools is not accurate for applications deployed on this platform. Software readiness has little to do with the compilation tools used, because virtual machines are capable of running any compatible code as long as it aligns with the correct architecture and operating system dependencies. Being compiled with a cloud-specific development kit does not influence whether initialization scripts run correctly upon boot.

There is also a misconception about networking requirements. Startup automation procedures are executed locally on the virtual machine without requiring connectivity to external networks. Even if the instance is assigned only a private address, the boot event still triggers local initialization logic. The lack of a public address does not inhibit access to the metadata server because that service is available internally to every instance within the environment.

It is also inaccurate to believe that these automated scripts are single-run actions. There is a separate metadata key for actions meant to occur only on the very first boot of a newly created instance. Startup automation scripts, however, run every time there is a boot event if configured correctly.

The correct explanation is that failure occurs when the initialization instructions are not attached to the correct metadata key responsible for startup execution. If it were instead provided in a location such as a project description field, a non-startup metadata key, or only entered into a manual shell command during creation, the instructions would not execute upon subsequent restarts. Ensuring the script is correctly placed in metadata under the startup category guarantees that the system runs it each time the virtual machine boots, maintaining expected application continuity after reboot events.

Question 2

Your company wants to ensure that critical datasets stored in Cloud Storage cannot be accidentally deleted. What configuration should be applied?

A) Enable Object Versioning
B) Use Multi-Regional Storage
C) Enable Object Lifecycle Management rules
D) Apply a Retention Policy with Bucket Lock

Answer: D

Explanation:

There is a feature specifically created to enforce constraints that prevent destructive modifications to valuable stored data. Applying a retention-based mechanism ensures that items placed into storage cannot be removed or altered until a specified duration has fully elapsed and the restriction has expired. In addition, an optional locking mechanism allows this retention policy to become permanently fixed, ensuring that no user can weaken or remove its enforcement after activation.

There is another feature that permits the keeping of previously overwritten files and allows recovery if a version has been replaced unintentionally. While this provides useful recovery capabilities for replace operations, it is still possible for users to delete every version of a file and eliminate it from the storage bucket. Therefore, while helpful for rollback and auditability, this does not fully protect against accidental deletion.

Selecting multiple geographically distributed storage locations increases durability and availability but does not provide deletion prevention. It focuses primarily on service performance and resilience, making it an unsuitable method for protecting against removal by users or automated scripts.

Automation rules exist that can remove files based on lifecycle stage, creation age, or other metadata triggers. While this can control storage hygiene by automatically clearing older data, the feature is designed for removal rather than protection and therefore does not prevent unwanted deletion. In fact, incorrect usage of lifecycle automation can accelerate accidental deletion.

The correct safeguard utilizes dedicated immutability rules. A retention-based control defines a minimum period that data must remain intact. Once locked, the policy cannot be shortened or disabled by any user, including administrators. This creates a forced preservation window aligned with compliance, regulatory requirements, or internal governance needs. Therefore, configuring these immutability controls is the only complete solution that prevents accidental or intentional destructive modification within the protected storage environment.

Question 3

A development team wants to SSH into Compute Engine instances without managing SSH keys manually. Which solution should be used?

A) Use OS Login integration with IAM
B) Configure a Bastion Host VM
C) Enable Private Google Access
D) Create service account keys for each user

Answer: A

Explanation:

There is a feature integrated into the identity and access system that automatically handles key creation and rotation on behalf of authenticated users. This method assigns permissions directly to user identities instead of requiring each person to upload, track, and revoke individual credentials. By automatically associating identities with Linux user accounts, access is granted or revoked using centralized administrative control rather than local key management.

A remote access point placed in a separate network segment can provide controlled entry into isolated infrastructure, but it does not eliminate the need to manually manage authentication keys. The purpose of such a system is to restrict entry and provide a single ingress path, not to automate identity credential handling. Therefore, even when used, users would still have to generate and maintain their own secure keys.

Some network services rely on allowed internal traffic paths to access resources not directly connected to the Internet. While this is beneficial for reaching certain APIs or metadata systems from non-public networks, it has no relationship to user identity authentication for Secure Shell access. It does not simplify key procedures nor interact with user accounts in remote login contexts.

Using machine identity credentials to grant human user access is not a recommended security pattern. These credentials are intended for workloads and automated processes rather than individuals. If used as described, users would need to manually store and control the credentials, increasing risk exposure and operational complexity.

The identity-integrated login feature removes this burden and ensures compliance with access governance. It allows administrators to revoke or authorize entry by updating user permissions rather than modifying keys on every virtual machine. Automatic key rotation contributes to improved security posture while reducing overhead for engineering teams. As a result, this fully automated login system is the correct and efficient method for providing human access to virtual machines without requiring manual control of SSH keys.

Question 4

Your company needs to move data from an on-premises SQL database to BigQuery every day with minimal operational overhead. Which service should you use?

A) Cloud Dataflow
B) Cloud SQL Export and Import
C) BigQuery Data Transfer Service
D) Compute Engine with cron jobs

Answer: C

Explanation:

There is a specific capability within the analytics ecosystem that was designed to automate the scheduled ingestion of data from external systems into the data warehouse environment. It removes the need for engineers to build pipelines or operate processing systems. By enabling recurring transfer mechanisms with simple configuration steps instead of writing custom code, daily ingestion becomes consistent and low-maintenance. That is why this automation is suitable for teams wanting minimal operational involvement while reliably updating datasets from external relational systems.

There is a data processing service on the platform capable of handling streaming and batch transformation tasks. It is flexible and powerful enough to implement customized pipelines to move and convert datasets. However, building such pipelines introduces operational responsibility, including deployment, performance tuning, and monitoring. Because the intent is to reduce operational overhead, relying on a stream/batch processing engine that requires development and maintenance does not align with the goal.

Exporting from a hosted relational database and importing into the data warehouse is technically possible, but it requires ongoing manual effort or additional automation layers. This approach would require exporting data locally, staging it, uploading it, and then triggering load operations. The absence of an automated daily schedule in this basic approach means staff would remain involved in orchestrating the repeated workflow.

Running scripts on a compute resource gives control and flexibility over when and how data moves. However, simply placing cron jobs on a server means engineers have to handle failure, scaling, patching, networking, authentication, and general upkeep. The responsibility for security and resilience increases operational overhead — the opposite of what the question requires.

The built-in transfer automation within the analytics environment was built exactly to solve this need. It creates a seamless bridge from external systems into the warehouse on repeatable schedules without requiring constant engineering attention. It also includes monitoring and resilient job handling to maintain reliability over long-term operations. Therefore, the native transfer automation is the correct answer for minimizing operational responsibility while ensuring daily delivery of updated data into analytical storage.

Question 5

You deployed a new application on Google Kubernetes Engine and want to ensure traffic is routed only to healthy Pods. What should you configure?

A) Horizontal Pod Autoscaler
B) Readiness Probes
C) Node Affinity
D) Resource Quotas

Answer: B

Explanation:

Reliable workload handling in a container orchestration system requires selectively exposing running components only when they are fully functional. For that purpose, there is a specific mechanism that determines whether an application is prepared to accept incoming traffic. It continuously checks the availability of application functionality, and only when the check succeeds does the system announce that the running unit can receive network requests. If the check fails, the load balancer stops directing traffic to it, maintaining healthy service delivery. This ensures that updates, restarts, or temporary processing issues do not disrupt the user experience.

There is a mechanism that automatically increases or decreases the number of container instances based on workload metrics. While this improves capacity handling and cost efficiency, it does not validate whether those running instances are ready to process traffic. Instead, it merely changes how many replicas exist.

There is also a placement control system that guides which physical machines a container may run on based on attributes like location or hardware capabilities. This is useful for optimizing performance, compliance, or topology concerns, but it has no influence on whether the running process is functional and allowed to receive network communications.

Resource control policies exist to assign limits to teams or namespaces to prevent over-consumption of resources. Although useful for governance and cost control, they do not monitor application health or traffic routing behavior.

The proper solution requires a mechanism that continuously checks application readiness and provides the orchestration system guidance regarding traffic delivery eligibility. When configured, the system isolates workload components until they indicate readiness, preventing routing to unprepared components and avoiding service interruptions during deployments or crashes. This guarantees the application only serves customers when fully operational. Therefore, configuring readiness checks ensures that only healthy application units receive traffic, fulfilling the operational requirement.

Question 6

A company must ensure that only specific internal services within the same VPC can access a Compute Engine instance. What should be used?

A) VPC Service Controls
B) Firewall rules with target tags or service accounts
C) Cloud Armor security policies
D) Route-based VPN

Answer: B

Explanation:

Access control between compute resources in a virtual network environment is primarily enforced using packet filtering capabilities configured at the network layer. These allow administrators to define which machines or identities can reach specific workloads by controlling traffic direction based on labels or associated identities. Target-specific configurations ensure traffic is only allowed from approved peers while all other internal sources are denied, achieving strict lateral access control.

There is a perimeter defense system available to restrict interactions between services and external networks or cross-project environments. That feature focuses on protecting managed services and regulated data boundaries rather than granular host-to-host traffic within a single network. Because the requirement is limited to access control inside the same environment, using a large-scale data perimeter control mechanism would be excessive and unrelated to local resource communication restrictions.

An edge security layer is available to protect externally exposed workloads from internet threats by applying policies at global or regional entry points. It is intended for public-facing applications and traffic arriving from outside the internal network boundary. Internal communication among networked systems does not pass through this external enforcement location, meaning the tool cannot restrict or manage internal lateral access.

A virtual private network configuration pertains to connecting remote environments or on-premises networks to the cloud network through encrypted tunnels. The situation described does not involve remote connectivity but instead concerns access relationships between resources already located within the same environment. Therefore, a connectivity solution for different physical sites is irrelevant.

The correct method to restrict internal access is to define rules that identify who can initiate connections into the protected virtual machine. Those rules can match either machine labels or assigned identities, enabling privileged internal workloads to communicate while preventing others from establishing contact. This directly enforces the principle of least privilege within the internal network layout and satisfies the requirement precisely.

Question 7

Your organization needs to deploy applications consistently across multiple environments with identical configurations, including production and staging. Which Google Cloud service best supports this requirement?

A) Deployment Manager
B) Cloud Run
C) Cloud Shell
D) Memorystore

Answer: A

Explanation:

There is a service designed to define infrastructure as structured templates that allow repeatable environment provisioning. By describing resources in configuration files, an organization can ensure that every deployment uses the same specifications, including networking, resource size, security policies, and other operational settings. This method reduces drift between environments because it provides consistent automation that ties deployments to versioned definitions rather than manual console operations. As a result, the infrastructure set up in multiple environments remains synchronized and predictable.

A managed container service exists to deploy stateless workloads that automatically scale with incoming requests. While highly beneficial for application hosting, it does not guarantee parity of underlying infrastructure between different environments because it abstracts infrastructure away. The platform takes responsibility for resource management, so if the objective is consistent configuration of everything around the application, including compute, network, storage, and policies, relying solely on this hosting platform will not satisfy those needs.

There is also an interactive command-line environment that allows developers to execute administrative tasks and issue commands against cloud resources. However, because this is a manual workspace for operators rather than an automated infrastructure provisioning system, using it to apply environments would lead to variations caused by human modification. Manual processes do not support deterministic deployments needed to ensure precise uniformity across multiple environments.

A memory caching service supports fast data access for applications and can be provisioned as needed. Although it plays an important role in improving performance for some workloads, it does not solve deployment consistency challenges. The service offers support for state management acceleration rather than full-environment infrastructure automation.

The correct solution is the infrastructure automation tool that uses written templates to define resource configurations as code. It ensures that any environment built from these templates will be identical because it uses the same logic, parameters, and definitions. This method eliminates discrepancies that arise from manual configuration steps, enabling more reliable testing and production releases. By adopting templated deployment mechanisms, the organization achieves uniformity between environments and strengthens both operational stability and deployment governance.

Question 8

A company wants to reduce the risk of exposed long-lived service account keys used by applications running on Compute Engine. What is the best solution?

A) Disable IAM roles for the service account
B) Use Workload Identity Federation
C) Configure SSH key access expiration
D) Encrypt keys using Cloud KMS

Answer: B

Explanation:

There is a method designed to eliminate the need to store sensitive identity credentials within applications or servers. Instead of relying on static cryptographic artifacts, workloads can securely obtain short-lived authentication tokens from trusted identity exchange flows. This greatly reduces exposure because no long-term credentials ever exist on the system that could be extracted or leaked. It allows workloads to impersonate identities temporarily, gaining only the minimal required privileges for the limited time the token remains valid.

Disabling permissions for an identity would remove functional access for the workload, causing applications to fail because they would lose the authorization needed to communicate with required services. The aim is not to eliminate access, but to reduce risk while maintaining operation. Therefore, simply removing role assignments is not a viable answer.

SSH access expiration pertains to human interactions with virtual machines, not machine-to-machine communication for running applications. The risk being addressed concerns service account credentials embedded in apps, which are used to authenticate API calls. Expiring secure shell credentials does nothing to protect workload identities from leak or misuse.

Securing keys using encryption still requires storing them on the instance at some point. Although protecting them with an encryption system improves durability against unauthorized scraping when the machine is compromised, the credentials still exist and can potentially be decrypted or exposed. The core issue is that the presence of permanent keys is itself a security weakness.

The correct solution integrates identity with access flows so that credentials are dynamically issued and never stored permanently. Short-lived tokens enable least-privilege access with minimal breach window. If a token were intercepted, its usability would expire quickly. This shifts the overall security posture from a vulnerable static model to a dynamic identity-based approach. It satisfies best practice in cloud security by eliminating persistent secrets on servers and greatly reducing compromise risk. Therefore, federation-based workload identity is the most secure and appropriate answer.

Question 9

A security administrator must ensure audit logs for all admin activities in Google Cloud are retained and not accidentally deleted. What feature should be enabled?

A) Organization Policy: Disable Firewall Rule Deletion
B) Cloud Storage Lifecycle Rules
C) Log Sinks with Bucket Lock and Retention Policy
D) Cloud Monitoring Uptime Checks

Answer: C

Explanation:

There is a method within the logging framework that allows all administrative activity to be exported to a secure archival location. Once stored, applying enforced data retention prevents any modification or removal of the logged entries for a mandated period. When combined with a lock that restricts editing of the retention settings, the archival location becomes immutable for the duration of its specified policy. This makes it impossible for anyone, including administrators, to destroy records prematurely. Such protection allows compliance with regulations and accountability for all critical administrative actions.

Preventing firewall rule deletion is a good operational protection control, but it does not influence log storage integrity. Restricting the removal of network policies does not ensure audit log retention. These controls operate at different layers, and solving one issue does not address the requirement involving the preservation of audit documentation.

Automated deletion rules in object storage accomplish the reverse of what is required. They purge files when certain conditions are met, which increases the risk of accidental removal of sensitive data. That approach is unsuitable for authenticating and preserving a tamper-resistant history of administrative actions. The requirement instead demands that nothing be deleted within the retention timeframe.

Uptime validation confirms the health and availability of cloud services. Although it helps with reliability and monitoring, it does not capture or preserve logs. It does not meet security audit preservation requirements in any capacity.

The proper solution, therefore, involves exporting logs to a secure, protected storage location where immutability can be enforced. Exporting logs into durable storage and locking the retention guarantees long-term record keeping needed to maintain compliance, security investigation capability, and organizational accountability. As a result, the correct answer involves creating dedicated archival pipelines to protected storage buckets with locked retention policies applied.

Question 10

Your organization wants to reduce costs by automatically shutting down development Compute Engine instances during non-business hours. What should you configure?

A) Preemptible VMs
B) Instance Scheduler using Cloud Scheduler and Cloud Functions
C) Sole-Tenant Nodes
D) VPC Flow Logs

Answer: B

Explanation:

There is a way to automate start and stop actions for virtual machine resources based on time-based triggers. Using scheduled invocations, a serverless compute component handles sending power management commands to the virtual machine environment at predefined hours. This eliminates the need for manual shutdown and ensures significant cost savings during idle periods with minimal operational effort. This automation meets the requirement by providing control without human intervention, freeing development teams from unnecessary spending.

Using a discounted type of compute resource provides savings, but those resources may be interrupted at any moment and are not intended for persistent development environments. They cannot guarantee uptime during working hours because the compute resources may be reclaimed at any point by the platform. Therefore, although this option provides cost reduction, it introduces instability and unpredictability that conflict with development needs.

Dedicated hardware allocation solves compliance and isolation requirements but is more expensive and designed for specialized workloads that require physical separation. Implementing isolated hardware would increase costs and does not inherently support automated shutdown behavior to reduce expenses.

Enabling traffic logging is completely unrelated to compute resource lifecycle management. It provides useful analytics about network flow patterns and security monitoring capabilities, but has no influence over when compute resources are running or stopped.

The precise strategy for cost control is to shut down compute resources when not needed. This can be orchestrated by combining time-based trigger services with serverless invocation logic to send virtual machine management instructions on a recurring schedule. It is adaptable to working hour timeframes and reduces cloud cost waste. Therefore, deploying a schedule-driven automation pipeline is the correct solution for powering down development compute resources outside of active usage periods.

Question 11

A company wants to store configuration secrets such as passwords and API keys securely and grant temporary access only to specific workloads. Which service should be used?

A) Cloud Secrets Manager
B) Cloud CDN
C) Filestore
D) Cloud NAT

Answer: A

Explanation:

There is a service specifically built for protecting sensitive configuration values, making them accessible only through strict authorization policies. It keeps values encrypted and out of application code or instance environments until the exact moment retrieval is authorized. It provides audit logs for all access requests, ensures integration with identity-based access controls, and allows rotation of confidential values without redeploying applications. When paired with temporary access controls, workloads only receive credentials long enough to complete needed operations, strengthening security posture.

A global caching service helps speed up content delivery for publicly served assets, but has no mechanism for storing credentials securely. It is intended for performance optimization rather than secret management. Expecting it to prevent sensitive config exposure would be inappropriate because it is focused on the distribution of static content, not confidential storage.

Network file storage provides shared access to data necessary for application state, but it is designed for filesystem workloads. Using shared storage to store secrets exposes them broadly to any client mounting the storage. It lacks dedicated identity-based access control at the level required to secure passwords or access tokens and does not integrate with secret lifecycle management.

Outbound translation services enable systems without public addressing to communicate externally. Although this solves network routing challenges, it does not handle protection or controlled distribution of sensitive content. It cannot ensure secure temporary access to credentials.

The appropriate approach centralizes confidential data with encryption and least-privilege access control. It ensures short-lived secret access where values remain impossible to retrieve except for applications explicitly authorized by identity rules. This protects credentials from accidental exposure and meets compliance needs. Therefore, using dedicated credential protection is the correct answer.

Question 12

A network engineer must create private communication between two Compute Engine instances in the same project while isolating them from other workloads. What should be implemented?

A) Shared VPC
B) Subnet segmentation and internal firewall rules
C) Cloud CDN
D) SSL offloading

Answer: B

Explanation:

To isolate communication paths, traffic must be contained within narrow subnet boundaries and permitted only across selected resources. Adding private network separation ensures that only intended machines reside in the same network segment. That layout alone provides a foundational layer of isolation by design. The second part is enforcing network access rules that constrain communication exclusively between those machines. This combination ensures both segmentation and traffic filtering are applied to protect private connectivity.

Centralized multi-project networking allows teams to share infrastructure and routing across environments. It is primarily used for organizational consolidation and governance rather than isolating workloads in the same project. Shared networking could broaden resource reach rather than restrict it, which opposes the isolation goal.

A content distribution network accelerates public service delivery by caching data at global edge locations. It interacts with public web traffic and does not address private internal routing. Since the requirement concerns private communication within the internal environment rather than public traffic optimization, this solution does not apply.

Transferring encryption work away from an application helps with performance for public-facing network communications, but it does not provide network segmentation or isolation. It benefits available performance, but does not handle security concerns related to internal lateral exposure.

By separating workloads at the subnet level and applying selective traffic allowance, network engineers can ensure that only the intended participants communicate. Others located in different segments will be unable to route traffic unless explicitly permitted. This strategy limits the exposure surface and achieves private communication within the same project. Segmentation and network control, therefore, form the correct strategy for internal isolation.

Question 13

Your development team must roll out new versions of a web application on Google Kubernetes Engine without causing downtime for users. Which deployment strategy should be used?

A) Rolling Update Deployment
B) Recreate Deployment
C) Manual Pod Deletion
D) Delete and Recreate the Cluster

Answer: A

Explanation:

To maintain a seamless user experience, the orchestration system must replace older application components with new ones gradually rather than removing everything at once. There is a built-in strategy that supports continuous application availability by incrementally updating the application. It introduces new running components and ensures they pass readiness checks before gradually decreasing the count of old running ones. This process avoids interruptions because traffic is constantly directed to healthy application versions throughout the change.

Another deployment strategy commonly used in simple or controlled environments involves stopping all currently running components before starting the newly updated version. This method is typically referred to as a “recreate” deployment. In essence, the old version of the application is completely shut down, and only after it is fully terminated do the new instances begin to launch. Because the system does not maintain any active version during the transition, there is a clear gap in availability.

From a technical perspective, this approach is straightforward. There is no need to manage traffic routing between multiple versions or coordinate gradual rollout patterns. Engineers only deploy one version at a time, which reduces deployment complexity and avoids potential conflicts between old and new components. For internal applications, testing environments, or services where downtime is acceptable, this simplicity can be beneficial.

However, the primary drawback is the user-visible outage. During the time it takes to shut down old components and start new ones, the application is completely unreachable. This downtime can disrupt user experience, interrupt business processes, and lead to financial or operational losses—especially for services that need continuous availability. Therefore, while easy to implement, this strategy is generally unsuitable for production systems where reliability and uptime are critical.

Simply deleting active application units manually lacks sophistication and predictable behavior. Humans would have to manage timing, ensuring that new components are fully functional and available before removing older ones. This introduces a high risk of interruptions and inconsistent performance, particularly during critical production usage periods.

Eliminating the entire hosting environment only to rebuild it entirely from scratch not only causes unacceptable outages but also increases operational burden significantly. The time to restore full cluster functionality exceeds tolerance for nearly any workload requiring uptime, and this method is not considered a practical deployment strategy.

The proper approach ensures a gradual transition from older versions to newer ones while maintaining uninterrupted service. It is designed specifically for zero-downtime upgrades and continuous deployment practices within production Kubernetes environments. As a result, incremental deployment with instance overlap is the correct choice for enabling the reliable rollout of application updates.

Question 14

You need to ensure that Compute Engine instances running sensitive workloads do not have external IP addresses and only access Google APIs privately. Which configuration accomplishes this?

A) Enable Private Google Access on the subnet
B) Assign a static external IP and block traffic using a firewall
C) Create a Cloud VPN tunnel
D) Deploy using spot instances

Answer: A

Explanation:

There is a networking capability that allows resources without a public network address to interact directly with a full suite of managed services entirely within a closed network boundary. It relies on private routing paths that do not require public exposure to the internet. When enabled at the network segment level, this connectivity restriction ensures that sensitive compute resources remain shielded while still being able to interact with core cloud services such as identity, storage, or monitoring. That design enforces the least exposure by removing the need for public access, yet preserves necessary functionality for workloads.

Assigning public addressing and attempting to restrict network flow through manual filtering significantly widens the potential attack surface. Even when blocked via network control mechanisms, the presence of public reachability means threats still exist. For environments containing highly sensitive processing tasks, best practice disallows public assignment entirely rather than permitting it with additional protection layers.

Creating a secure tunnel between separate network environments is an essential approach for organizations that must connect their on-premises infrastructure to a cloud environment. This mechanism, often implemented through technologies such as VPN or dedicated private connections, allows data to travel securely over encrypted channels. By doing so, it ensures privacy, integrity, and confidentiality while the two environments communicate. Businesses frequently rely on this setup when they migrate applications to the cloud or when workloads must remain split across both environments for reasons like regulatory compliance, legacy dependencies, or operational continuity.

However, this secure tunnel serves a very specific purpose: connecting networks, not providing internal communication between cloud-based services. It is designed to bridge the gap between what exists in the physical data center and what operates inside the cloud platform. Once the data reaches the cloud, internal routing and service-to-service communication follow the cloud provider’s own networking architecture rather than continuing inside the secure tunnel. As a result, the tunnel does not remove or replace the communication rules and security boundaries that already exist within the cloud infrastructure.

Additionally, this type of network connection does not eliminate the requirement for public access when interacting with certain managed services hosted in the cloud. Many cloud-native services—such as object storage, serverless compute, or managed databases—are accessed through public endpoints unless enhanced connectivity features like private service access or service endpoints are explicitly configured. The secure tunnel alone does not automatically integrate these services into the private network space. Without further configuration, resources that rely on public interfaces will still need public IP addresses or public DNS routing.

Another important point is that this secure connection does not provide cloud-internal protection or restrict access among services within the cloud environment. Its role is to allow trusted communication across network boundaries, not to enforce security policies or segmentation inside the cloud. Organizations must still implement cloud-native security controls, including firewalls, private subnets, identity and access management, and traffic inspection mechanisms, to maintain a strong internal security posture.

A secure network tunnel is a valuable tool for extending private connectivity between on-premises and cloud networks. Yet it does not replace cloud-internal connectivity mechanisms, does not remove the necessity for public endpoints in managed services by default, and does not enforce internal security restrictions. It is one part of a broader, layered networking strategy.

Using temporary discounted compute allocation has no security implications for limiting public access. It is simply a cost-optimization tool without any direct contribution to network exposure controls.

The correct method applies dedicated routing, allowing compute workloads without public addresses to reach protected platform services securely through private internal paths. This maintains data confidentiality while ensuring normal service operations continue functioning as intended. Therefore, enabling the feature that provides private access to essential managed services fulfills the requirement precisely.

Question 15

Your operations team needs real-time visibility into system metrics such as CPU utilization and disk usage for Compute Engine instances. Which service should be used?

A) Cloud Monitoring
B) Dataproc
C) Pub/Sub
D) Cloud Storage

Answer: A

Explanation:

Observability for compute workloads requires a system capable of ingesting performance data and presenting it through dashboards, alerts, and analytics. There is a tool designed specifically to collect operational metrics from virtual machines and cloud services in real time. It provides visualization, threshold alerts, and historical trend analysis. With automated agent installation, resource metrics flow continuously into monitoring dashboards where operations teams can quickly identify issues, diagnose failures, and ensure performance goals are being met.

A managed cluster-based data processing service focuses on large-scale analytical workloads using a particular distributed computation framework. Although capable of processing large datasets, it does not provide direct service observability features, nor does it capture infrastructure-level health and performance metrics for individual compute resources.

A messaging solution is designed to allow different software components, services, or applications to communicate with each other in a flexible and decoupled way. In a distributed architecture, components are often running on different servers or even in different geographic regions. Direct, synchronous communication can introduce delays, failures, or tight dependencies that reduce system resilience. Messaging technologies solve this by enabling asynchronous communication. When one component needs to send information to another, it simply publishes a message to a queue or a topic, and the receiving component can process it later when it is ready. This approach supports scalability, fault tolerance, and loose coupling between systems.

However, a messaging solution is not intended to be a performance-monitoring or analytics tool. Although it efficiently transports data, it does not inherently interpret or analyze that data. For example, metrics like response times, memory usage, server load, or throughput statistics are not automatically gathered or displayed. The messaging system simply moves messages from one point to another without assessing what they mean or how processing them impacts overall system performance.

Because of this focus on transport rather than insights, a messaging system does not provide dashboards, alerts, or built-in monitoring views related to application health or behavior. It cannot inform administrators whether a server is failing, whether there is a performance bottleneck, or whether a consumer service is falling behind. To access such information, additional monitoring tools—such as logging services, telemetry platforms, or APM (Application Performance Monitoring) solutions—must be integrated. These tools analyze activity, detect anomalies, and present meaningful data about how the system is performing.

Furthermore, even though some messaging platforms offer limited statistics, like queue depth or message delivery rate, these indicators alone do not provide a complete picture of operational health. They may indicate delays in processing, but they cannot identify root causes such as CPU exhaustion, memory leaks, or network congestion. Significant external tooling, configuration, and sometimes custom instrumentation are required to transform raw message data into actionable performance insights.

A messaging solution excels at enabling asynchronous event-driven communication within distributed systems, enhancing reliability and flexibility. But it is not a monitoring or performance-measurement tool. To achieve visibility into system health and performance, organizations must rely on additional monitoring solutions that complement the messaging infrastructure.

A scalable storage service retains objects for long-term durability. It is not designed for performance monitoring or uptime analytics. Storing metrics in such a system would require considerable engineering effort to build dashboards and real-time querying capabilities, and even then, performance insights would not be immediate.

Metrics gathering and alert response require a tool built for system oversight. The monitoring platform integrates directly with compute resources and provides a fully managed solution for visibility, alert automation, and operational reliability. It enables immediate understanding of performance trends and assists with proactive detection of potential failures. Therefore, proper observability is achieved by using the monitoring solution specifically created for metrics and operational insights.