Microsoft AZ-800 Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 15 Q211-225

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-800 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 211

You are tasked with implementing hybrid identity protection for your enterprise. The organization requires detection of unusual sign-in behavior, compromised credentials, real-time risk assessment, and integration with conditional access policies to protect both on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Manual password audits
C) Cloud-only password resets
D) Local account review

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Identity

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Identity provides a comprehensive and advanced hybrid identity protection solution that is designed to monitor and analyze authentication and user behavior across both on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory, offering continuous security assessment and detection of unusual or risky sign-in patterns, credential compromise, insider threats, lateral movement attempts, and privilege escalation, which can indicate malicious activity or potential breaches. By leveraging behavioral analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence, it identifies anomalies such as impossible travel events, atypical user activity, multiple failed authentication attempts, unusual device logins, or sudden changes in privilege assignments, allowing organizations to detect threats in real time before they can compromise sensitive systems or data. The integration with conditional access policies in Azure Active Directory allows Defender for Identity to enforce automated protective measures such as requiring multi-factor authentication, temporarily blocking risky accounts, or restricting access to sensitive resources when suspicious activity is detected, thereby reducing the risk of data loss, unauthorized access, or compliance violations. All detected events are logged and correlated with other security systems for comprehensive auditing, reporting, and compliance purposes, providing visibility into security incidents and allowing administrators to conduct forensic analysis and respond to threats proactively. Microsoft Defender for Identity also integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Sentinel or other SIEM platforms, enabling centralized monitoring, advanced threat correlation, alerting, and automated remediation workflows, which enhance overall security posture and operational efficiency. Manual password audits, on the other hand, are time-consuming, reactive, and limited in scope, providing only a point-in-time snapshot of potential vulnerabilities and failing to detect dynamic threats in real time, leaving accounts exposed to compromise. Cloud-only password resets address only previously identified compromised credentials and do not provide proactive monitoring or real-time threat detection, limiting their effectiveness in preventing attacks. Local account review is resource-intensive, error-prone, and cannot scale effectively in enterprise environments with thousands of users, leaving gaps in detection, monitoring, and response. Microsoft Defender for Identity is the correct solution because it offers continuous monitoring, behavioral analysis, risk-based conditional access enforcement, audit logging, compliance reporting, and seamless hybrid integration, ensuring real-time detection of suspicious activities, proactive threat response, operational visibility, and regulatory compliance across both on-premises and Azure Active Directory, providing a robust, enterprise-grade hybrid identity protection strategy that reduces risk, increases accountability, and maintains secure access to critical resources while enabling administrators to manage identities efficiently and respond to security incidents rapidly. Its combination of real-time analytics, automated enforcement, and integration with other Microsoft security solutions ensures that hybrid identity environments are protected from evolving threats while maintaining operational continuity and compliance with corporate and regulatory security standards, delivering a scalable, proactive, and efficient approach to enterprise identity security management.

Question 212

You are responsible for hybrid backup and disaster recovery for Windows Server workloads. The organization requires automated backup scheduling, centralized management, encrypted storage, long-term retention, and integration with Azure for disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Backup
B) Local backups only
C) Manual disk copies to cloud storage
D) Third-party backup without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Backup

Explanation:

Azure Backup provides a comprehensive, centralized, and automated hybrid backup solution that protects enterprise Windows Server workloads across on-premises servers and Azure virtual machines, enabling administrators to define backup schedules, configure retention policies, and monitor backup health from a unified management portal, ensuring operational continuity, compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements, and visibility into backup operations. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and security against unauthorized access, which is critical for protecting sensitive corporate information and meeting security and compliance mandates. Azure Backup integrates with System Center Data Protection Manager or the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services agent to provide application-consistent backups, capturing critical workloads, files, folders, and entire server systems, ensuring recoverability in the event of accidental deletion, corruption, ransomware attacks, or site-level disasters. Incremental backup technology optimizes storage usage and reduces network bandwidth requirements by capturing only changes since the last backup, improving efficiency and reducing operational overhead. Recovery options include granular file-level and folder-level restores as well as full system recovery, supporting rapid operational restoration and minimal disruption to business activities. Dashboards, alerts, and reporting capabilities provide administrators with detailed visibility into backup health, compliance with retention policies, and operational metrics, allowing proactive remediation of potential issues before they impact business operations. Local backups alone lack centralization, automation, encryption, and long-term retention, leaving organizations vulnerable to data loss and requiring significant manual effort. Manual disk copies to cloud storage are inefficient, error-prone, do not guarantee encryption or consistent recovery, and cannot support enterprise-grade disaster recovery strategies. Third-party backup solutions without Azure integration provide limited visibility, lack centralized management and monitoring, and do not support seamless hybrid disaster recovery, increasing administrative complexity and risk exposure. Azure Backup is the correct solution because it delivers centralized, automated, encrypted backup with long-term retention, seamless integration with Azure disaster recovery, detailed monitoring, compliance reporting, and operational efficiency, ensuring enterprise Windows Server workloads are protected reliably, securely, and consistently across hybrid environments, reducing administrative overhead, mitigating operational risk, enabling rapid recovery, and supporting compliance with regulatory and corporate policies. Its combination of automation, encryption, hybrid integration, incremental backups, and reporting makes it uniquely suited for enterprise disaster recovery and hybrid backup strategies, providing scalable, reliable, and efficient protection for critical workloads while maintaining operational resilience and business continuity.

Question 213

You are responsible for hybrid disaster recovery of critical Windows Server workloads. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, automated failover orchestration, non-disruptive test failovers, minimal downtime, and monitoring integration for operational visibility. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery provides a comprehensive hybrid disaster recovery solution designed to replicate on-premises Windows Server workloads continuously to Azure, maintaining synchronized data and minimizing potential loss during site-level failures, disasters, or unplanned outages while ensuring application-consistent replication to prevent corruption and guarantee reliable recovery of workloads and dependent services. It enables administrators to conduct non-disruptive test failovers to validate recovery plans, verify dependencies, confirm correct startup sequences, and ensure application availability without impacting production environments, supporting regulatory compliance, operational readiness, and business continuity. Automated failover orchestration sequences the startup of virtual machines, applications, and dependent services, minimizing downtime and ensuring that critical workloads remain accessible during disaster events, while recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives can be configured to align with organizational and service-level requirements. Azure Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting services, providing dashboards, replication health metrics, operational insights, and proactive notifications that allow administrators to identify issues early and respond effectively to maintain operational oversight and continuity. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is fully supported, allowing workloads to return after normal operations resume, providing flexibility and ensuring that business processes can continue seamlessly. Local backups provide only point-in-time protection and cannot maintain continuous replication, automated failover, or non-disruptive test failovers, resulting in slower, manual, and less reliable recovery. Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, do not maintain synchronization, lack automated failover, and cannot support testing, making them unsuitable for enterprise disaster recovery scenarios. Cluster Shared Volumes provide local high availability but do not extend recovery capabilities to Azure, leaving workloads vulnerable in the event of site-level failures or disasters. Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it delivers continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, minimal downtime, flexible failback, and operational visibility, ensuring enterprise Windows Server workloads are resilient, highly available, compliant, and recoverable in hybrid environments while providing a scalable, secure, and reliable disaster recovery solution that protects critical infrastructure, maintains business continuity, and reduces operational risk. Its combination of continuous replication, orchestration, test validation, monitoring, and failback capability ensures that hybrid disaster recovery operations are efficient, resilient, and aligned with enterprise business continuity objectives.

Question 214

You are tasked with implementing hybrid identity management for your enterprise. The organization requires single sign-on for cloud applications, secure authentication using on-premises credentials, enforcement of password policies, and conditional access across both on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication
B) Cloud-only accounts
C) Local user accounts on each server
D) Microsoft accounts for domain services

Answer: A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication

Explanation:

Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication provides a comprehensive hybrid identity solution that allows users to authenticate to Azure cloud applications using their existing on-premises Active Directory credentials, providing single sign-on capabilities and eliminating the need for multiple passwords, which simplifies the user experience while enhancing security. It validates passwords directly against the on-premises Active Directory, ensuring that corporate password policies, including complexity, expiration, and lockout settings, are consistently applied across both cloud and on-premises environments, reducing the risk of weak passwords or misconfigurations. Multi-factor authentication can be integrated seamlessly to provide an additional layer of security, protecting against compromised credentials and unauthorized access. Conditional access policies can be applied based on user, device, location, or risk level, providing context-aware access control that aligns with organizational security requirements and mitigates risks associated with remote or risky logins. High availability is achieved through the deployment of multiple authentication agents, ensuring uninterrupted authentication even if individual agents fail, reducing downtime and minimizing operational impact. All authentication events are logged for auditing, monitoring, and compliance purposes, providing visibility into access patterns and enabling administrators to respond proactively to potential security incidents. Cloud-only accounts require separate credentials for Azure services, creating fragmented identity management, increasing administrative overhead, and resulting in inconsistent policy enforcement. Local user accounts on each server prevent centralized identity management, complicate password policy enforcement, and reduce auditing capabilities, leaving gaps in security oversight. Microsoft accounts for domain services do not integrate with corporate Active Directory, cannot enforce enterprise password policies, and fail to provide centralized management or single sign-on for organizational applications. Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication is the correct solution because it provides secure, centralized authentication using on-premises credentials, enforces corporate password policies, supports single sign-on, integrates multi-factor authentication, enables conditional access, ensures high availability, and provides comprehensive auditing and compliance capabilities, addressing hybrid identity management requirements efficiently while enhancing security, operational continuity, and administrative efficiency across enterprise Windows Server workloads. Its combination of authentication security, policy enforcement, hybrid integration, auditing, and high availability makes it uniquely suited for large-scale enterprise environments requiring robust hybrid identity solutions, streamlined management, and protection against identity-based threats.

Question 215

You are responsible for hybrid backup and disaster recovery for Windows Server workloads. The organization requires automated scheduling, centralized monitoring, encrypted storage, long-term retention, and integration with Azure for disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Backup
B) Local backups only
C) Manual disk copies to cloud storage
D) Third-party backup without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Backup

Explanation:

Azure Backup provides a centralized, automated, and secure hybrid backup solution for enterprise Windows Server workloads across both on-premises and Azure environments, enabling administrators to define backup schedules, configure retention policies, and monitor backup health from a single management portal, which ensures operational continuity, compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements, and visibility into backup operations. Data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, providing confidentiality, integrity, and protection against unauthorized access, which is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and meeting compliance mandates. Integration with System Center Data Protection Manager or the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services agent allows application-consistent backups of servers, files, folders, and critical workloads, ensuring that recovery restores data in a usable state and maintains operational continuity even in the event of accidental deletion, corruption, ransomware attacks, or site-level disasters. Incremental backups optimize storage usage and reduce network bandwidth consumption by capturing only changes since the last backup, enhancing efficiency and reducing operational costs. Recovery options include granular file-level and folder-level restores as well as full system restores, supporting rapid restoration of services and minimal disruption to business operations. Dashboards, alerts, and reporting capabilities provide administrators with insights into backup health, compliance adherence, storage usage, and operational metrics, enabling proactive remediation of potential issues before they impact business continuity. Local backups alone lack centralization, automation, encryption, and long-term retention, leaving organizations vulnerable to data loss and requiring significant manual effort. Manual disk copies to cloud storage are inefficient, error-prone, lack guaranteed encryption or consistent recovery, and do not support enterprise disaster recovery strategies effectively. Third-party backup solutions without Azure integration provide limited visibility, lack centralized management, and do not support hybrid disaster recovery, increasing administrative complexity and risk exposure. Azure Backup is the correct solution because it provides centralized, automated, encrypted backup with long-term retention, seamless integration with Azure disaster recovery, monitoring, compliance reporting, and operational efficiency, ensuring enterprise Windows Server workloads are protected reliably and consistently across hybrid environments while reducing administrative overhead, mitigating operational risk, enabling rapid recovery, and supporting compliance. Its combination of automation, encryption, hybrid integration, incremental backups, and detailed reporting makes it uniquely suited for enterprise disaster recovery strategies, providing a scalable, reliable, and efficient approach to protecting critical workloads while maintaining business continuity.

Question 216

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery provides a comprehensive hybrid disaster recovery solution for Windows Server workloads by continuously replicating on-premises servers to Azure, maintaining synchronized data to ensure minimal potential loss during site failures, disasters, or unplanned outages while supporting application-consistent replication to prevent corruption and ensure reliable recovery of workloads and dependent services, which is critical for maintaining business continuity and operational resilience. Non-disruptive test failovers allow administrators to validate recovery plans, confirm dependencies, verify workload startup sequences, and ensure application availability without impacting production environments, providing operational readiness and regulatory compliance assurance. Automated failover orchestration sequences virtual machines, applications, and dependent services to minimize downtime and ensure critical workloads remain accessible, while recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives can be defined to meet organizational and service-level requirements. Integration with Azure monitoring and alerting provides dashboards, replication health metrics, operational visibility, and proactive notifications, enabling administrators to identify issues early, respond quickly, and maintain oversight of disaster recovery operations. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is fully supported, allowing workloads to return after normal operations resume, ensuring flexibility and continuity. Local backups provide only point-in-time protection and cannot maintain continuous replication, automated failover, or test failovers, resulting in slower, manual, and less reliable recovery processes. Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, lack ongoing synchronization, failover orchestration, and testing capabilities, making them unsuitable for enterprise-grade disaster recovery scenarios. Cluster Shared Volumes provide local high availability but do not extend recovery capabilities to Azure, leaving workloads vulnerable in the event of site-level failures. Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it delivers continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, minimal downtime, failback flexibility, and operational visibility, ensuring enterprise Windows Server workloads remain resilient, highly available, compliant, and recoverable in hybrid environments. Its combination of replication, orchestration, test validation, monitoring, and failback capabilities ensures efficient, secure, and enterprise-ready disaster recovery, protecting critical infrastructure, maintaining business continuity, reducing operational risk, and supporting compliance while providing a scalable, reliable, and effective solution for hybrid disaster recovery management.

Question 217

You are tasked with implementing hybrid monitoring and performance management for enterprise Windows Server workloads. The organization requires the collection of system metrics, application logs, real-time alerting, automated remediation, and centralized dashboards across on-premises and Azure environments. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Local Performance Monitor only
C) Manual log inspection
D) Third-party monitoring without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor provides a comprehensive hybrid monitoring and performance management solution designed to collect and analyze telemetry from Windows Server workloads across both on-premises and Azure environments, providing administrators with centralized visibility into system performance, application health, network traffic, storage utilization, and operational trends, which allows proactive identification and remediation of performance issues before they affect users or business operations, enabling informed decision-making and ensuring optimal service delivery. By aggregating system metrics, application logs, and network telemetry from multiple sources, Azure Monitor enables correlation of events, identification of patterns, and root cause analysis, which helps in understanding operational dependencies, detecting anomalies, and predicting resource requirements for capacity planning. Custom alerts can be configured based on predefined thresholds, trends, or anomalies to detect CPU spikes, memory pressure, disk latency, network congestion, or application errors in real time, providing actionable insights and minimizing downtime. Integration with Azure dashboards allows visualization of key performance indicators and operational health across hybrid environments, enabling administrators to monitor trends and respond to emerging issues effectively. Automated remediation can be implemented using Azure Automation or Logic Apps to execute predefined scripts or workflows, such as restarting services, scaling resources, or remediating configuration issues when alerts are triggered, reducing operational risk and minimizing manual intervention. Local Performance Monitor provides only basic metrics for individual servers and lacks centralized aggregation, cross-environment correlation, proactive alerting, and automation, limiting its effectiveness in enterprise hybrid environments. Manual log inspection is reactive, labor-intensive, and prone to human error, delaying issue detection and increasing operational risk. Third-party monitoring solutions without Azure integration provide partial visibility into on-premises workloads but cannot offer centralized dashboards, hybrid correlation, automated alerting, or remediation, resulting in fragmented monitoring, slower response times, and higher administrative overhead. Azure Monitor is the correct solution because it provides centralized telemetry collection, real-time alerting, automated remediation, centralized visualization, and hybrid integration, ensuring continuous monitoring, performance optimization, operational resilience, compliance, and reduced administrative burden for Windows Server workloads. Its combination of monitoring, alerting, visualization, and automated response makes it uniquely suited for enterprises requiring hybrid visibility, operational insight, and reliable service performance, providing a scalable, secure, and efficient solution that addresses performance management challenges comprehensively while enhancing operational efficiency and reliability across both on-premises and cloud environments.

Question 218

You are responsible for hybrid privileged access management. The organization requires just-in-time administrative access, multi-factor authentication, auditing of privileged actions, and enforcement of least-privilege principles across on-premises and Azure resources. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Permanent Domain Admin accounts
C) Shared local administrator passwords
D) Unrestricted access from any device

Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management

Explanation:

Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides a comprehensive solution for hybrid privileged access management by granting just-in-time administrative access, ensuring elevated privileges are only active for a limited period, and automatically revoked afterward, which enforces least-privilege principles, reduces the risk of misuse, and minimizes attack surfaces across enterprise environments. Multi-factor authentication is required to activate privileged roles, mitigating the risk of compromised credentials and unauthorized access, while detailed auditing and logging of all privileged activities support compliance, forensic analysis, and regulatory reporting, allowing organizations to maintain accountability and monitor privileged operations effectively. PIM allows the creation of approval workflows, requiring authorization before activating elevated privileges, ensuring additional oversight, and controlling access to critical resources, while periodic access reviews prevent privilege creep by removing unnecessary rights from users, maintaining a secure administrative environment. Alerts for unusual or high-risk activity provide proactive identification of potential threats, reducing the likelihood of privilege abuse, insider attacks, or misconfiguration. Permanent Domain Admin accounts provide continuous elevated access, increasing exposure to compromise and violating least-privilege principles, making them unsuitable for secure hybrid administration. Shared local administrator passwords reduce accountability, complicate auditing, and increase the risk of unauthorized access, as multiple users share the same credentials, creating potential vulnerabilities. Unrestricted access from any device bypasses security controls, leaving sensitive resources exposed and failing to provide auditing or compliance capabilities, which is unacceptable in enterprise environments. Azure AD Privileged Identity Management is the correct solution because it provides centralized control, just-in-time privileged access, multi-factor authentication, auditing, approval workflows, and enforcement of least-privilege principles, ensuring secure, compliant, and manageable administration across both on-premises and Azure resources. Its combination of security, oversight, automation, and compliance capabilities makes it uniquely suited for hybrid enterprise environments that require robust administrative controls, risk mitigation, operational efficiency, and regulatory adherence while protecting critical infrastructure from potential misuse or compromise.

Question 219

You are responsible for hybrid file storage and disaster recovery. Branch offices require low-latency access to frequently used files, automated cloud tiering for older files, centralized management, and integration with backup solutions. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure File Sync
B) DFS Replication
C) BranchCache
D) Storage Replica

Answer: A) Azure File Sync

Explanation:

Azure File Sync provides a hybrid file storage and disaster recovery solution that centralizes enterprise file shares in Azure while caching frequently accessed files locally on branch office Windows Servers, ensuring low-latency access, seamless user experience, and operational efficiency, while automatically tiering older or infrequently accessed files to Azure, reducing local storage requirements, optimizing cost, and maintaining a single source of truth for organizational data across multiple locations. Administrators can manage multiple servers from the Azure portal, configure cloud tiering policies, monitor synchronization health, and enforce consistent access permissions, simplifying management, improving compliance, and providing visibility into storage utilization and performance. Integration with Azure Backup ensures that both cached and cloud-stored files are protected from accidental deletion, corruption, or ransomware attacks, supporting disaster recovery, business continuity, and operational resilience. Cloud replication provides redundancy and enables rapid recovery in case of server or site-level failures while maintaining seamless access for users, minimizing disruption. DFS Replication only replicates files between on-premises servers, requires full local storage, lacks cloud tiering, and does not integrate with backup solutions, increasing administrative effort and storage cost. BranchCache improves WAN performance by caching frequently accessed files locally, but does not provide cloud tiering, centralized management, or backup integration, limiting its suitability for enterprise hybrid disaster recovery. Storage Replica provides local high availability but does not support cloud tiering, backup integration, or low-latency local access, making it insufficient for hybrid file management. Azure File Sync is the correct solution because it provides local caching, cloud tiering, centralized management, hybrid replication, backup integration, and seamless access, ensuring optimized storage utilization, operational efficiency, and robust disaster recovery for branch offices and enterprise Windows Server environments. Its combination of hybrid performance, centralized management, and integration with cloud backup makes it uniquely suited for organizations requiring secure, efficient, and resilient file services across multiple locations while maintaining business continuity and protecting critical organizational data.

Question 220

You are tasked with implementing hybrid identity protection for your enterprise. The organization requires detection of risky sign-ins, compromised credentials, and automated enforcement of conditional access policies across on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Defender for Identity
B) Manual password audits
C) Cloud-only password resets
D) Local account review

Answer: A) Microsoft Defender for Identity

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Identity provides a robust and comprehensive hybrid identity protection solution that monitors authentication activity and user behavior across both on-premises Active Directory and Azure Active Directory, providing real-time detection of compromised credentials, risky sign-ins, lateral movement attempts, privilege escalation, and insider threats, which are critical for protecting enterprise environments against advanced persistent threats and identity-based attacks. The system uses machine learning, behavioral analytics, and threat intelligence to detect anomalies such as impossible travel events, unusual device logins, multiple failed authentication attempts, and privilege changes that are inconsistent with normal behavior, allowing organizations to identify potential attacks before they can impact critical systems or data. Integration with Azure Active Directory conditional access enables automated enforcement of security measures, including requiring multi-factor authentication, blocking access temporarily, or restricting access to sensitive resources when risky behavior is detected, thereby mitigating exposure and protecting organizational assets. All detected activities are logged and correlated with other security solutions to provide comprehensive auditing, compliance reporting, and operational visibility, which enables administrators to conduct forensic analysis, respond proactively to threats, and maintain regulatory compliance. Defender for Identity also integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Sentinel and other SIEM platforms, providing centralized monitoring, advanced threat correlation, alerting, and automated remediation, which enhances the overall security posture and reduces operational overhead. Manual password audits are time-consuming, reactive, and provide only periodic snapshots of potential vulnerabilities without detecting ongoing risks, leaving users and systems exposed to compromise. Cloud-only password resets address compromised credentials after the fact, but do not provide real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, or proactive enforcement, limiting their effectiveness in preventing attacks. Local account reviews require manual effort, are not scalable in enterprise environments, and do not provide centralized monitoring, auditing, or automated remediation, leaving significant gaps in hybrid identity security. Microsoft Defender for Identity is the correct solution because it provides continuous monitoring, proactive risk detection, automated policy enforcement, centralized auditing, and integration with conditional access across both on-premises and cloud directories, ensuring that hybrid identity environments are protected against evolving threats while maintaining compliance and operational continuity. Its combination of behavioral analytics, automated enforcement, audit visibility, and integration with broader security platforms ensures that administrators can detect, respond to, and mitigate identity-based risks efficiently and effectively, reducing exposure, improving operational efficiency, and supporting enterprise security strategy. By providing a scalable, enterprise-ready solution for hybrid identity protection, Defender for Identity ensures that organizations maintain secure access to critical systems, enhance accountability, and enable proactive threat management while reducing administrative effort and increasing confidence in identity and access security.

Question 221

You are responsible for hybrid backup and disaster recovery for enterprise Windows Server workloads. The organization requires centralized management, automated scheduling, encrypted storage, long-term retention, and integration with Azure for recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Backup
B) Local backups only
C) Manual disk copies to cloud storage
D) Third-party backup without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Backup

Explanation:

Azure Backup provides a centralized, automated, and secure hybrid backup solution designed to protect Windows Server workloads across both on-premises and Azure environments, allowing administrators to define backup schedules, retention policies, and monitor backup health from a unified management portal, which ensures operational continuity, compliance with organizational policies and regulatory requirements, and visibility into backup operations. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, providing confidentiality, integrity, and protection against unauthorized access, which is critical for safeguarding sensitive organizational data. Integration with System Center Data Protection Manager or the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services agent allows application-consistent backups for servers, files, folders, and critical workloads, ensuring that recovery restores data in a usable state and supports operational continuity even in the event of accidental deletion, corruption, ransomware attacks, or site-level disasters. Incremental backup technology optimizes storage usage and reduces network bandwidth consumption by capturing only changes since the last backup, enhancing efficiency and reducing operational overhead. Recovery options include granular file-level and folder-level restores as well as full system restores, enabling rapid restoration of services and minimal disruption to business operations. Dashboards, alerts, and reporting provide administrators with insights into backup health, compliance with retention policies, storage utilization, and operational performance, allowing proactive remediation of potential issues. Local backups alone are insufficient because they lack centralization, automation, encryption, and long-term retention, leaving organizations vulnerable to data loss and requiring significant manual effort. Manual disk copies to cloud storage are inefficient, error-prone, lack encryption, and do not provide consistent recovery or integration with disaster recovery workflows, which reduces reliability. Third-party backup solutions without Azure integration cannot provide centralized monitoring, automated scheduling, hybrid visibility, or seamless disaster recovery, increasing administrative complexity and operational risk. Azure Backup is the correct solution because it delivers centralized, automated, encrypted backup with long-term retention, hybrid integration, detailed monitoring, reporting, and operational efficiency, ensuring Windows Server workloads are protected reliably and securely across hybrid environments while minimizing administrative effort, mitigating operational risk, enabling rapid recovery, and supporting compliance. Its combination of automation, encryption, centralized management, hybrid integration, incremental backups, and reporting makes it uniquely suited for enterprise disaster recovery, providing scalable, reliable, and efficient protection for critical workloads while maintaining business continuity and reducing operational complexity.

Question 222

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery provides a comprehensive hybrid disaster recovery solution that continuously replicates on-premises Windows Server workloads to Azure, maintaining synchronized data to ensure minimal potential loss during unplanned outages, disasters, or site-level failures, while supporting application-consistent replication to prevent data corruption and ensure reliable recovery of workloads and dependent services, which is critical for maintaining business continuity and operational resilience. Non-disruptive test failovers allow administrators to validate recovery plans, confirm application dependencies, verify workload startup sequences, and ensure availability without impacting production operations, providing operational readiness, compliance assurance, and confidence in disaster recovery preparedness. Automated failover orchestration sequences virtual machines, applications, and dependent services to minimize downtime and ensure critical workloads remain operational, while recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives can be configured to meet organizational and service-level requirements, ensuring alignment with business continuity goals. Azure Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting, providing dashboards, replication health metrics, operational visibility, and proactive notifications, enabling administrators to detect issues early, respond rapidly, and maintain oversight of disaster recovery operations. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is fully supported, allowing workloads to return after normal operations resume, providing flexibility and ensuring seamless business operations. Local backups provide only point-in-time protection and cannot maintain continuous replication, automated failover, or test failovers, resulting in slower, manual, and less reliable recovery processes. Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, lack continuous synchronization, automated failover, and testing capabilities, making them unsuitable for enterprise disaster recovery scenarios. Cluster Shared Volumes provide local high availability but do not extend recovery capabilities to Azure, leaving workloads vulnerable in the event of site-level failures. Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it delivers continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, minimal downtime, failback flexibility, and operational visibility, ensuring enterprise Windows Server workloads remain resilient, highly available, compliant, and recoverable in hybrid environments while providing a scalable, secure, and reliable disaster recovery strategy that protects critical infrastructure, maintains business continuity, reduces operational risk, and supports compliance. Its combination of replication, orchestration, test validation, monitoring, and failback capabilities ensures efficient, secure, and enterprise-ready disaster recovery, safeguarding critical workloads while maintaining operational continuity, regulatory adherence, and resilience across both on-premises and cloud environments.

Question 223

You are responsible for implementing hybrid monitoring and performance optimization for enterprise Windows Server workloads. The organization requires the collection of system metrics, application logs, real-time alerts, automated remediation, and centralized dashboards across both on-premises and Azure environments. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Local Performance Monitor only
C) Manual log inspection
D) Third-party monitoring without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor provides a comprehensive hybrid monitoring and performance optimization solution designed to centralize telemetry collection from Windows Server workloads across both on-premises infrastructure and Azure environments, allowing administrators to monitor system metrics, application logs, network traffic, storage utilization, and operational trends in real time, which enables proactive identification and remediation of performance issues before they impact end users or business operations. By aggregating telemetry data from multiple sources, Azure Monitor facilitates correlation of events, root cause analysis, anomaly detection, and trend monitoring, helping administrators understand operational dependencies, predict resource requirements, and optimize performance. Custom alerts can be configured based on thresholds, patterns, or anomalies, detecting CPU spikes, memory pressure, disk latency, network congestion, or application errors, providing actionable insights and enabling timely intervention. Integration with Azure dashboards allows visualization of key performance indicators and operational health across hybrid environments, supporting informed decision-making, planning, and reporting. Automated remediation is achievable through Azure Automation or Logic Apps, executing predefined scripts or workflows to restart services, scale resources, or resolve configuration issues when alerts are triggered, which reduces operational risk and minimizes manual intervention. Local Performance Monitor only provides metrics for individual servers, lacks centralized aggregation, cross-environment correlation, proactive alerting, or automation, limiting its ability to provide enterprise-wide monitoring or operational insight. Manual log inspection is reactive, time-consuming, and prone to error, delaying identification of performance issues and increasing operational risk. Third-party monitoring solutions without Azure integration may offer partial on-premises visibility but cannot provide centralized dashboards, hybrid correlation, automated alerting, or remediation, resulting in fragmented monitoring, slower response times, and increased administrative overhead. Azure Monitor is the correct solution because it combines centralized telemetry collection, real-time alerting, visualization, automated remediation, and hybrid integration, ensuring continuous monitoring, performance optimization, operational resilience, and compliance across Windows Server workloads. Its combination of monitoring, alerting, visualization, and automated response provides scalable, secure, and efficient performance management, enabling enterprises to maintain high availability, reliability, and operational efficiency across both on-premises and cloud environments while reducing administrative effort and enhancing business continuity. By providing deep insights, proactive alerting, and integrated automation, Azure Monitor empowers administrators to optimize server performance, detect anomalies before they affect operations, and implement rapid remediation, ensuring the hybrid infrastructure remains reliable, secure, and aligned with organizational goals.

Question 224

You are responsible for hybrid privileged access management. The organization requires just-in-time administrative access, multi-factor authentication, auditing of privileged actions, and enforcement of least-privilege principles across both on-premises and Azure resources. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Permanent Domain Admin accounts
C) Shared local administrator passwords
D) Unrestricted access from any device

Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management

Explanation:

Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides a robust hybrid solution for managing privileged access by enabling just-in-time administrative access, ensuring that elevated privileges are only active for a specified duration and automatically revoked afterward, thereby enforcing least-privilege principles, reducing the attack surface, and limiting exposure of critical resources. Multi-factor authentication is required when activating privileged roles, which mitigates the risk of compromised credentials and unauthorized access while enhancing security for sensitive administrative operations. PIM provides detailed auditing and logging of all privileged activities, supporting compliance, regulatory reporting, and forensic analysis, ensuring administrators can maintain visibility and accountability over elevated actions. It supports approval workflows for role activation, allowing organizations to require supervisory or manager authorization before granting access, further strengthening control and oversight. Periodic access reviews prevent privilege creep by removing unnecessary or unused elevated rights, maintaining a secure administrative environment, and ensuring compliance with security policies. Alerts for high-risk or unusual activity enable proactive threat identification and rapid response, reducing the likelihood of insider threats, misconfigurations, or privilege abuse. Permanent Domain Admin accounts provide continuous elevated access, violating least-privilege principles, increasing the risk of misuse, and creating a significant attack vector, making them unsuitable for enterprise hybrid environments. Shared local administrator passwords reduce accountability, complicate auditing, and increase the potential for unauthorized access, as multiple users share the same credentials. Unrestricted access from any device bypasses security controls, leaving sensitive resources exposed and failing to provide auditing or compliance tracking. Azure AD Privileged Identity Management is the correct solution because it delivers centralized management, just-in-time privileged access, multi-factor authentication, auditing, approval workflows, and enforcement of least-privilege principles, ensuring secure and compliant administration across on-premises and Azure resources. Its combination of automated access control, monitoring, reporting, and policy enforcement provides organizations with a scalable, enterprise-grade privileged access management solution that reduces operational risk, ensures regulatory compliance, and maintains operational efficiency. By limiting exposure, enhancing accountability, and providing visibility into administrative actions, Azure AD PIM ensures that hybrid administrative operations are secure, auditable, and aligned with organizational security objectives while reducing administrative overhead and protecting critical infrastructure from compromise.

Question 225

A) Azure File Sync
B) DFS Replication
C) BranchCache
D) Storage Replica

Answer: A) Azure File Sync

Explanation:

Azure File Sync provides a comprehensive hybrid file storage and disaster recovery solution that centralizes enterprise file shares in Azure while caching frequently accessed files locally on branch office Windows Servers, ensuring low-latency access for users, operational efficiency, and seamless experience, while automatically tiering older or infrequently accessed files to Azure, reducing local storage usage, optimizing cost, and maintaining a single source of truth for organizational data across multiple locations. Administrators can manage multiple servers from the Azure portal, configure cloud tiering policies, monitor synchronization health, and enforce consistent access permissions, simplifying administration, enhancing compliance, and providing visibility into storage utilization and performance. Integration with Azure Backup ensures that both cached and cloud-stored files are protected from accidental deletion, corruption, or ransomware attacks, supporting disaster recovery, business continuity, and operational resilience. Cloud replication ensures redundancy, enabling rapid recovery from server or site-level failures while maintaining seamless access to users, minimizing operational disruption. DFS Replication only replicates files between on-premises servers, requiring full local storage, lacks cloud tiering, and does not integrate with backup solutions, which increases administrative overhead and cost. BranchCache improves WAN performance by caching frequently accessed files locally, but does not provide cloud tiering, centralized management, or backup integration, limiting its usefulness for hybrid disaster recovery. Storage Replica provides local high availability but does not support cloud tiering, backup integration, or low-latency local access, making it insufficient for branch office hybrid storage management. Azure File Sync is the correct solution because it delivers local caching, cloud tiering, centralized management, hybrid replication, backup integration, and seamless access, ensuring optimized storage utilization, operational efficiency, and robust disaster recovery for branch offices and enterprise Windows Server environments. Its combination of hybrid performance, centralized administration, cloud integration, and protection features makes it uniquely suited for organizations requiring efficient, secure, and resilient file services across multiple locations, maintaining business continuity, and protecting critical organizational data while simplifying management and reducing operational risk.

Microsoft AZ-800 Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 15 Q211-225

Related posts: