Microsoft AZ-800 Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q121-135

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-800 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121

You are responsible for implementing a hybrid identity solution that allows users to access Azure cloud applications using on-premises Active Directory credentials. Users must have single sign-on capabilities, and passwords should be verified locally. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication
B) Cloud-only accounts
C) Local user accounts on each server
D) Microsoft accounts for domain services

Answer: A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication

Explanation:

Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication allows organizations to integrate on-premises Active Directory with Azure Active Directory for hybrid identity management. With this solution, users can log in to Azure cloud applications using their existing corporate credentials, eliminating the need for separate cloud accounts. Authentication requests from Azure are securely transmitted to on-premises agents, which validate the credentials against the local Active Directory. This ensures that password policies, complexity requirements, and account lockout policies are enforced consistently, maintaining compliance with enterprise security standards. Single sign-on is supported, providing a seamless user experience across both on-premises and cloud environments, reducing the need for multiple credentials and lowering helpdesk workload related to password issues.

This solution also supports high availability through multiple authentication agents installed in different locations. If one agent fails, others continue to handle authentication requests, ensuring uninterrupted access. Administrators can monitor authentication requests and failures through logs, enabling auditing and compliance reporting. Integration with Azure AD conditional access policies enhances security by enforcing multi-factor authentication and access controls based on device compliance, location, or risk levels. Azure AD Connect simplifies identity management by automatically synchronizing users, groups, and attributes from on-premises Active Directory to Azure AD, ensuring consistency and centralized administration.

Cloud-only accounts require separate credentials for Azure applications, fragmenting identity management and creating additional administrative overhead. Users must remember multiple passwords, which increases support requests and reduces productivity.

Local user accounts on each server do not integrate with Azure AD, preventing centralized authentication and single sign-on. This approach increases administrative complexity, reduces security oversight, and does not support hybrid cloud scenarios.

Microsoft accounts for domain services disconnecting enterprise authentication from Active Directory, making it impossible to enforce corporate policies or maintain centralized control. They provide minimal integration with hybrid environments and are unsuitable for enterprise-level identity management.

Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication is the correct solution because it ensures secure, seamless authentication across hybrid environments, enforces enterprise password policies, supports single sign-on, and reduces administrative overhead while maintaining centralized identity governance.

Question 122

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server environment and need to centralize file shares in Azure while providing fast local access at branch offices. Older files should be tiered to the cloud, and the solution must integrate with backup and disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure File Sync
B) DFS Replication
C) BranchCache
D) Storage Replica

Answer: A) Azure File Sync

Explanation:

Azure File Sync is a hybrid file management solution that enables organizations to centralize file shares in Azure while maintaining local caching on on-premises Windows Servers. Frequently accessed files remain available locally for low-latency access, while less frequently used files are tiered to Azure, reducing storage requirements on branch servers. Users continue to access all files through the same SMB paths, ensuring seamless operation without changing workflows. Administrators can centrally manage multiple servers, monitor synchronization status, and configure cloud tiering policies through the Azure portal. Integration with Azure Backup allows file-level and server-level recovery in case of accidental deletion, corruption, or ransomware attacks. The solution preserves NTFS permissions, access control lists, and metadata, maintaining consistent security and governance across hybrid environments. Cloud replication ensures that changes are synchronized between multiple servers and Azure, providing a unified source of truth and supporting disaster recovery strategies. Azure File Sync also offers operational insights through monitoring dashboards, alerting, and reporting for hybrid file management, enabling proactive management and optimization.

DFS Replication supports replication between on-premises servers but does not integrate with Azure for cloud tiering, centralized management, or backup. It requires local copies of all files, increasing storage use and administrative complexity.

BranchCache optimizes WAN performance by caching frequently accessed files locally, but does not support cloud tiering or centralized management. It cannot serve as a centralized file repository and lacks disaster recovery integration.

Storage Replica provides synchronous or asynchronous replication between servers or clusters for high availability, but does not integrate with Azure cloud storage, tiering, or backup. It is suitable for local disaster recovery but not for hybrid cloud optimization.

Azure File Sync is the correct solution because it provides local caching, cloud tiering, centralized management, hybrid replication, backup integration, and seamless access across hybrid environments. It reduces storage costs, ensures disaster recovery readiness, and maintains performance for branch office users.

Question 123

You are responsible for disaster recovery in a hybrid Windows Server environment. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, test failover capabilities, automated failover orchestration, and minimal downtime while maintaining compliance with recovery objectives. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery provides a comprehensive disaster recovery solution for hybrid Windows Server environments. It enables continuous replication of on-premises workloads to Azure, ensuring that data is synchronized and available for rapid recovery. Application-consistent replication captures the state of running workloads, preserving data integrity and minimizing the risk of corruption during failover. Administrators can perform test failovers to validate recovery plans and verify that dependencies between virtual machines and services are properly orchestrated. Automated failover orchestration ensures that workloads are restored in the correct order, reducing recovery time and ensuring business continuity. Recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) can be configured to meet enterprise continuity requirements, minimizing operational disruption during outages.

Azure Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting, providing dashboards, replication health status, and proactive notifications to identify potential issues. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is supported after a disaster is resolved, ensuring operational flexibility. Centralized reporting enables administrators to track replication health, compliance, and operational readiness, reducing administrative overhead and improving accountability. The solution is designed for hybrid environments, bridging on-premises Windows Servers and Azure resources to deliver scalable, reliable, and auditable disaster recovery.

Local backups provide basic protection but do not enable continuous replication or automated orchestration. Recovery is manual and can lead to extended downtime.

Manual virtual machine exports are time-consuming, error-prone, and do not maintain ongoing synchronization of workloads, increasing the risk of data loss during failover.

Cluster Shared Volumes provide on-premises high availability but do not extend disaster recovery to Azure. In the event of a site-wide failure, workloads remain inaccessible, leaving critical systems unprotected.

Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it provides continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, and minimal downtime for hybrid Windows Server workloads. It ensures business continuity, operational resilience, and compliance with recovery objectives in hybrid environments.

Question 124

You are responsible for managing a hybrid Windows Server environment. Administrators need secure, temporary privileged access that enforces just-in-time elevation, multi-factor authentication, auditing, and compliance reporting for both on-premises and Azure resources. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management
B) Permanent Domain Admin accounts
C) Shared local administrator passwords
D) Unrestricted access from any device

Answer: A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management

Explanation:

Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is a solution designed to manage, monitor, and secure privileged access across hybrid Windows Server environments. It provides just-in-time elevation, granting temporary administrative privileges only when necessary, reducing the risk associated with standing privileges. Multi-factor authentication is required before activating elevated privileges, ensuring that access is verified and authorized. PIM logs all administrative activities, providing auditing and compliance reporting. Organizations can track who activated privileges, what changes were made, and when actions occurred, which is critical for regulatory compliance and internal governance.

PIM supports approval workflows, requiring elevated access to be authorized before activation. Access reviews and automatic expiration of unnecessary privileges prevent privilege creep, reducing the potential for misuse or compromise. Integration with both on-premises servers and Azure resources ensures that the same policies and security principles are enforced across hybrid environments, maintaining consistent governance. Alerts and notifications for unusual activity allow proactive security monitoring, while integration with SIEM solutions and Microsoft Sentinel enables centralized analysis of privileged operations. By enforcing least privilege, time-bound access, and multi-factor authentication, PIM significantly reduces the attack surface and strengthens the security posture.

Permanent Domain Admin accounts create persistent high-level access that increases risk exposure if credentials are compromised. Auditing and monitoring for permanent accounts are often insufficient, making them unsuitable for modern hybrid environments.

Shared local administrator passwords prevent accountability and increase the likelihood of unauthorized access. Multiple users sharing credentials makes it impossible to track actions, violating security best practices and compliance requirements.

Unrestricted access from any device bypasses security controls and exposes privileged accounts to malware, phishing, and unauthorized use, compromising hybrid infrastructure security.

Azure AD Privileged Identity Management is the correct solution because it provides time-bound, MFA-protected, auditable, and governed privileged access across both on-premises and Azure resources, reducing risk and ensuring compliance.

Question 125

You are tasked with implementing hybrid backup for Windows Server workloads. The organization requires centralized management, long-term retention, encrypted data in transit and at rest, and integration with Azure for disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Backup
B) Local backups only
C) Manual disk copies to cloud storage
D) Third-party backup without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Backup

Explanation:

Azure Backup is a hybrid backup solution that enables centralized management of on-premises Windows Servers and Azure workloads. Administrators can schedule backups, monitor job status, and enforce retention policies across multiple servers from a single portal. Azure Backup supports long-term retention to meet regulatory and business requirements. Data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, ensuring security and compliance during storage and transfer.

The solution integrates with on-premises servers using the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services agent or System Center Data Protection Manager. It supports file and folder backups, full server backups, and application-consistent snapshots. Incremental backups reduce storage requirements and network bandwidth consumption. Recovery options include file-level, folder-level, and full system restores, enabling rapid recovery from accidental deletion, corruption, or ransomware attacks. Azure Backup dashboards provide monitoring, reporting, and alerts, ensuring administrators maintain operational awareness and compliance. Integration with Azure monitoring and alerting tools enables proactive identification of potential backup issues. Azure Backup reduces administrative overhead by centralizing operations and automating tasks, while ensuring enterprise-grade security and disaster recovery readiness.

Local backups alone do not provide centralized management, cloud-based disaster recovery, or long-term retention. They are vulnerable to hardware failure and require additional administrative effort for off-site protection.

Manual disk copies to cloud storage are inefficient, error-prone, and lack automation. They do not support application-consistent backups, encryption, or compliance reporting.

Third-party backup solutions without Azure integration may provide local backups but cannot leverage Azure features for monitoring, centralized management, or disaster recovery, limiting hybrid capabilities.

Azure Backup is the correct solution because it provides centralized, encrypted, automated, and policy-driven backup for hybrid Windows Server environments, ensuring long-term retention, operational efficiency, and disaster recovery readiness.

Question 126

You are responsible for implementing hybrid disaster recovery for on-premises Windows Server workloads. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, minimal downtime, and monitoring integration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery is a disaster recovery service designed for hybrid Windows Server environments. It enables continuous replication of on-premises workloads to Azure, ensuring that data remains synchronized and available for rapid recovery. Application-consistent replication captures running workloads’ state, maintaining data integrity during failover. Administrators can perform test failovers to validate recovery plans, verify dependencies, and confirm that workloads will operate correctly without impacting production systems. Automated failover orchestration sequences virtual machine startup and service dependencies, reducing recovery time and minimizing downtime. Recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) can be configured to meet business continuity requirements, ensuring minimal operational disruption.

Azure Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting to provide dashboards, replication health status, and proactive alerts, allowing administrators to address issues before they impact recovery. Failback to on-premises environments is supported, ensuring flexibility and operational continuity. Centralized reporting enables tracking of replication health, compliance, and readiness for audits, reducing administrative burden. The solution bridges on-premises and Azure resources, offering scalable, resilient, and auditable disaster recovery for hybrid environments.

Local backups provide protection but do not support continuous replication, orchestration, or test failover. Recovery is manual, slow, and prone to errors, increasing downtime.

Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, error-prone, and cannot maintain synchronization, making them unsuitable for critical hybrid workloads.

Cluster Shared Volumes provide local high availability but do not extend disaster recovery to Azure. In the event of a site-wide failure, workloads remain inaccessible, leaving critical systems unprotected.

Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it provides continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, and minimal downtime for hybrid Windows Server workloads, ensuring business continuity, operational resilience, and compliance.

Question 127

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server environment and need to centralize patch management. The organization requires automated deployment, scheduling, compliance enforcement, and reporting across both on-premises and Azure servers. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Update Manager
B) Manual updates by local administrators
C) Disable updates to prevent downtime
D) Third-party patch management without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Update Manager

Explanation:

Azure Update Manager is a centralized service for patch management in hybrid Windows Server environments. It automates the deployment of updates to both on-premises servers and Azure virtual machines, ensuring consistent patching across all systems. Administrators can schedule updates during maintenance windows to prevent disruption to business-critical workloads. The service provides compliance enforcement, tracking missing updates, deployment success, and patch adherence against organizational policies. Centralized dashboards offer visibility into update status, helping administrators quickly identify and remediate failed deployments. Integration with Azure Monitor allows proactive alerting when updates fail or vulnerabilities are detected. Pre- and post-deployment scripts can be automated, enabling custom workflows such as service shutdowns, testing, or validation during updates. This ensures operational continuity while maintaining compliance with security baselines. By automating and centralizing patch management, Azure Update Manager reduces administrative effort, prevents inconsistent patching, and ensures hybrid workloads remain secure and compliant.

Manual updates by local administrators are inefficient and error-prone. Individual servers may be updated inconsistently, leaving some systems vulnerable. Without centralized tracking, compliance auditing is difficult, and operational oversight is limited.

Disabling updates to prevent downtime exposes servers to security vulnerabilities, malware, and ransomware. It also violates enterprise security policies and regulatory compliance requirements.

Third-party patch management solutions without Azure integration may manage on-premises servers, but cannot provide unified visibility or automation across hybrid environments. Lack of integration with Azure monitoring and reporting limits operational efficiency and control.

Azure Update Manager is the correct solution because it provides centralized, automated, auditable, and policy-driven patch management across hybrid Windows Server environments. It ensures compliance, minimizes downtime, and maintains security and operational continuity.

Question 128

You are tasked with implementing a hybrid file solution that centralizes storage in Azure while providing fast local access at branch offices. Less frequently used files should be tiered to the cloud, and the solution must integrate with backup and disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure File Sync
B) DFS Replication
C) BranchCache
D) Storage Replica

Answer: A) Azure File Sync

Explanation:

Azure File Sync enables centralized file storage in Azure while maintaining local caching on on-premises Windows Servers for branch offices. Frequently accessed files remain local, providing low-latency access, while infrequently used files are tiered to the cloud, reducing local storage requirements. Users continue to access files through the same SMB paths, ensuring transparency and ease of use. Administrators can centrally manage multiple servers, monitor synchronization status, and configure cloud tiering policies through the Azure portal. Integration with Azure Backup allows for file-level and server-level recovery in case of accidental deletion, corruption, or ransomware. The solution preserves NTFS permissions, access control lists, and metadata, maintaining consistent governance across hybrid environments. Cloud replication ensures that updates are synchronized across multiple servers and Azure, creating a single source of truth and supporting disaster recovery strategies. Azure File Sync provides operational insights through monitoring dashboards, alerts, and reporting, enabling administrators to proactively manage storage and optimize performance.

DFS Replication supports replication between on-premises servers but lacks integration with Azure for tiering, backup, or centralized management. It requires local copies of all files, increasing storage usage and administrative effort.

BranchCache improves WAN performance by caching frequently accessed files locally, but it does not tier data to Azure or integrate with backup and disaster recovery services. It cannot serve as a centralized storage solution.

Storage Replica provides high-availability replication between servers or clusters, but does not integrate with Azure for cloud tiering or backup. It is suitable for local disaster recovery, but not hybrid file optimization.

Azure File Sync is the correct solution because it provides local caching, cloud tiering, centralized management, backup integration, and hybrid replication. It optimizes storage, ensures disaster recovery readiness, and maintains performance across branch offices.

Question 129

You are responsible for implementing hybrid disaster recovery for on-premises Windows Server workloads. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, automated orchestration of failover, test failover capabilities, minimal downtime, and monitoring integration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery provides comprehensive disaster recovery for hybrid Windows Server environments. It enables continuous replication of workloads to Azure, ensuring data synchronization and availability for rapid recovery. Application-consistent replication captures the state of running workloads to maintain data integrity and prevent corruption during failover. Administrators can perform test failovers to validate recovery plans, verify dependencies, and confirm that workloads will operate correctly without impacting production systems. Automated failover orchestration sequences virtual machine startup and service dependencies, reducing downtime and ensuring business continuity. Recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) can be configured to meet enterprise requirements, minimizing operational disruption during outages.

Azure Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting to provide dashboards, replication health status, and proactive notifications, allowing administrators to address potential issues before they impact recovery. Failback to on-premises environments is supported, ensuring flexibility and operational continuity. Centralized reporting enables tracking of replication health, compliance, and readiness for audits, reducing administrative effort. The solution bridges on-premises and Azure resources, offering scalable, resilient, and auditable disaster recovery for hybrid environments.

Local backups provide basic protection but do not support continuous replication, automated orchestration, or test failover. Recovery is manual, slow, and prone to errors, increasing downtime.

Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, error-prone, and do not maintain synchronization, making them unsuitable for critical hybrid workloads.

Cluster Shared Volumes provide on-premises high availability but do not extend disaster recovery to Azure. In case of a site-wide failure, workloads remain inaccessible, leaving critical systems unprotected.

Question 130

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server environment and need to provide administrators secure remote access to Azure virtual machines without exposing RDP or SSH to the public internet. The solution must support multi-factor authentication, centralized auditing, and seamless access from the Azure portal. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Bastion
B) Assign public IP addresses to VMs
C) Enable VPN-less remote desktop access
D) Use consumer remote access software

Answer: A) Azure Bastion

Explanation:

Azure Bastion is a fully managed service that enables secure RDP and SSH access to Azure virtual machines through the Azure portal without exposing the servers to the public internet. By avoiding public IP addresses, Bastion reduces the attack surface and prevents brute-force attacks or unauthorized access. It integrates with Azure role-based access control, enforcing administrative permissions and providing audit logs of all session activity. Multi-factor authentication is supported, ensuring that only authorized users can access virtual machines. Administrators can connect using a web browser, eliminating the need for additional client software and simplifying secure management across hybrid environments. Bastion scales to support multiple concurrent sessions, allowing operational flexibility in large environments. Centralized monitoring and logging help maintain compliance and detect unusual activity, providing visibility into all remote sessions.

Assigning public IP addresses to virtual machines exposes servers to potential attacks and increases security risk. Open RDP/SSH ports are vulnerable to brute-force attacks and malware exploits, making this approach unsafe in hybrid environments.

Enabling VPN-less remote desktop access bypasses network security controls, exposing administrative sessions to interception and credential compromise. It does not provide auditing, compliance reporting, or MFA enforcement.

Consumer remote access software lacks enterprise-level security, auditing, and compliance features. Such solutions introduce unmanaged access points, increasing the risk of credential theft and operational security breaches.

Azure Bastion is the correct solution because it provides secure, auditable, MFA-protected remote access to Azure virtual machines, ensuring operational security while supporting hybrid administrative needs.

Question 131

You are responsible for implementing hybrid disaster recovery for on-premises Windows Server workloads. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, automated failover orchestration, test failover capabilities, minimal downtime, and integration with monitoring services. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that enables continuous replication of on-premises Windows Server workloads to Azure. It supports application-consistent replication, ensuring that running workloads are captured in a consistent state for failover. Administrators can perform test failovers to validate recovery plans without impacting production, confirming that dependencies and virtual machine sequences operate correctly. Automated failover orchestration sequences virtual machine startup and service dependencies, minimizing downtime and ensuring business continuity. Recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives can be configured to meet organizational requirements, reducing operational impact during outages.

Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting, providing dashboards, replication health insights, and proactive notifications. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is supported, ensuring flexibility once the disaster is resolved. Centralized reporting allows tracking of replication health, operational readiness, and compliance, reducing administrative effort and ensuring auditability. Site Recovery bridges on-premises and Azure resources, offering scalable, resilient, and auditable hybrid disaster recovery.

Local backups provide limited protection and do not enable continuous replication, orchestration, or test failovers. Recovery is manual, slower, and prone to errors, increasing downtime.

Manual virtual machine exports are inefficient, error-prone, and cannot maintain synchronized workloads, making them unsuitable for critical systems.

Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it provides continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, and minimal downtime, ensuring business continuity and operational resilience for hybrid Windows Server workloads.

Question 132

You are tasked with implementing hybrid backup for Windows Server workloads. The organization requires centralized management, long-term retention, encrypted storage in transit and at rest, and integration with Azure for disaster recovery. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Backup
B) Local backups only
C) Manual disk copies to cloud storage
D) Third-party backup without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Backup

Explanation:

Azure Backup is a cloud-integrated backup solution for hybrid Windows Server environments. It allows administrators to centrally manage backup schedules, monitor job status, and enforce retention policies across multiple servers from a single portal. Long-term retention ensures compliance with regulatory requirements and organizational policies. Data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, protecting sensitive information during transfer and storage.

Azure Backup integrates with on-premises Windows Servers using the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services agent or System Center Data Protection Manager. It supports full server, file, folder, and application-consistent backups. Incremental backups reduce storage and bandwidth usage, while recovery options include file-level, folder-level, and full system restores. Integration with Azure Backup enables rapid disaster recovery, ensuring minimal downtime during outages or data loss incidents. Dashboards provide operational insights, including backup job status, health, and alerts. Azure Backup simplifies administration, reduces operational overhead, and provides centralized visibility for hybrid workloads.

Local backups alone lack centralized management, cloud-based disaster recovery, and long-term retention. They are vulnerable to physical damage, data corruption and require additional administrative effort.

Manual disk copies to cloud storage are inefficient, error-prone, and lack automation. They do not support application-consistent backups, encryption, or centralized reporting.

Third-party backup solutions without Azure integration may support on-premises backups but cannot leverage cloud-based monitoring, centralized management, or disaster recovery, limiting hybrid capabilities.

Question 133

You are responsible for implementing hybrid identity management for your organization. Users must access Azure cloud applications using on-premises credentials, with single sign-on and local password validation. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication
B) Cloud-only accounts
C) Local user accounts on each server
D) Microsoft accounts for domain services

Answer: A) Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication

Explanation:

Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication integrates on-premises Active Directory with Azure Active Directory, allowing users to authenticate to cloud applications using their existing corporate credentials. Passwords are validated against the local Active Directory, maintaining consistent security policies, including complexity requirements and lockout policies. Single sign-on is enabled, providing a seamless user experience across on-premises and cloud resources, reducing the need for multiple credentials and minimizing helpdesk support requests.

The solution supports high availability through the deployment of multiple authentication agents in different locations. If one agent fails, others continue to handle authentication requests, ensuring uninterrupted access. All authentication events are logged for auditing and compliance reporting, allowing organizations to monitor sign-ins and detect unusual activities. Integration with Azure AD conditional access policies allows administrators to enforce multi-factor authentication, device compliance, and location-based restrictions for additional security. Azure AD Connect also synchronizes users, groups, and attributes, ensuring consistency and centralized management of hybrid identities.

Cloud-only accounts require separate credentials for Azure applications, creating fragmentation and increasing administrative workload. Users must remember multiple passwords, which reduces productivity and increases the likelihood of support requests.

Local user accounts on each server do not integrate with Azure AD and prevent centralized identity management. Single sign-on is not possible, and auditing or enforcing security policies across hybrid systems is difficult.

Microsoft accounts for domain services, separate enterprise authentication from Active Directory, making centralized management and enforcement of corporate policies impossible. Integration with hybrid environments is minimal, making this option unsuitable for enterprise needs.

Azure AD Connect Pass-through Authentication is the correct solution because it provides secure, seamless authentication, single sign-on, centralized identity management, and compliance across hybrid environments.

Question 134

You are tasked with implementing hybrid file management. Branch offices require local access to frequently used files, while older files should be tiered to the cloud. Backup and disaster recovery integration is required. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure File Sync
B) DFS Replication
C) BranchCache
D) Storage Replica

Answer: A) Azure File Sync

Explanation:

Azure File Sync centralizes file shares in Azure while maintaining local caches on branch office servers for fast access. Frequently accessed files remain local, reducing latency and improving user experience. Older or infrequently used files are automatically tiered to Azure, freeing up on-premises storage while maintaining seamless access through the same file paths. Administrators can centrally manage multiple servers, configure cloud tiering policies, and monitor synchronization status using the Azure portal. Integration with Azure Backup provides file-level and server-level recovery, protecting against accidental deletion, ransomware, and data corruption. NTFS permissions, metadata, and access control lists are preserved, ensuring consistent security and governance across hybrid environments. Cloud replication synchronizes files across servers and Azure, creating a single source of truth and supporting disaster recovery. Operational dashboards, alerts, and reporting help administrators proactively manage storage and optimize performance.

DFS Replication (DFS-R) and BranchCache are both technologies provided by Microsoft to improve file availability and network performance within enterprise environments, but each has significant limitations when it comes to hybrid storage, cloud integration, and comprehensive disaster recovery. DFS Replication is designed primarily to replicate files between on-premises servers, ensuring that multiple servers within a network maintain synchronized copies of shared folders. This capability allows users to access the same files from different physical locations without relying on a single server, improving data availability and resilience within the enterprise. DFS-R uses a multi-master replication model with remote differential compression, which reduces bandwidth usage by transferring only changes in files rather than entire files. Despite these benefits, DFS Replication does not provide advanced storage optimization features such as cloud tiering or automated integration with cloud backup solutions like Azure Backup. All replicated data is stored on local storage, which can increase disk usage as multiple copies of the same files exist across servers. As the number of replicated folders and servers grows, administrative overhead also rises, requiring careful planning of replication groups, monitoring for replication failures, and manual intervention to maintain consistency. Moreover, DFS-R does not include native disaster recovery capabilities for catastrophic events affecting entire sites, meaning organizations must deploy separate disaster recovery solutions to ensure data can be restored or accessed in case of large-scale failures.

BranchCache, on the other hand, focuses on improving wide area network (WAN) performance by caching frequently accessed files locally at branch offices. When a file is requested from a remote server, BranchCache stores a local copy so that subsequent requests for the same file do not need to traverse the WAN, reducing latency and improving user experience. This caching mechanism is particularly valuable in distributed organizations with multiple remote sites that rely on central file servers. However, BranchCache is not a data replication or tiering solution; it does not move or store data permanently in cloud storage and cannot integrate with cloud backup services like Azure Backup. Cached files are temporary and primarily serve to reduce network traffic rather than optimize storage use or support hybrid cloud architectures. Consequently, while BranchCache enhances network efficiency and user access, it cannot replace a comprehensive storage management strategy or serve as a hybrid backup and disaster recovery solution.

Together, DFS Replication and BranchCache illustrate the limitations of traditional on-premises technologies when applied to modern hybrid environments. DFS-R ensures on-premises file availability but increases storage consumption and administrative complexity, while BranchCache improves WAN performance without addressing cloud integration or long-term storage optimization. Neither solution provides native cloud tiering, automated backup integration, or centralized management for hybrid deployments. Organizations seeking fully hybrid capabilities must combine these tools with additional solutions, such as Azure File Sync, cloud-based backup systems, or replication services, to achieve centralized administration, optimized storage usage, and reliable disaster recovery across both on-premises and cloud environments. Both technologies are useful within their intended scope, but their limitations highlight the need for modern hybrid storage and replication strategies to reduce overhead, increase efficiency, and ensure resilience in distributed networks.

Storage Replica provides synchronous or asynchronous replication for high availability, but does not integrate with cloud tiering or backup. It is suitable for local disaster recovery but does not optimize hybrid storage.

Azure File Sync is the correct solution because it provides local caching, cloud tiering, centralized management, hybrid replication, backup integration, and seamless access for branch offices while optimizing storage and ensuring disaster recovery readiness.

Question 135

You are responsible for hybrid disaster recovery of on-premises Windows Server workloads. The organization requires continuous replication to Azure, automated failover orchestration, test failovers, minimal downtime, and monitoring integration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Local backups only
C) Manual virtual machine exports
D) Cluster Shared Volumes without Azure integration

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery is a comprehensive disaster recovery solution for hybrid Windows Server environments. It enables continuous replication of on-premises workloads to Azure, ensuring data is synchronized and available for rapid recovery. Application-consistent replication captures running workloads’ state to maintain data integrity and prevent corruption during failover. Administrators can perform test failovers to validate recovery plans without affecting production systems, verifying dependencies and virtual machine sequences. Automated failover orchestration ensures workloads start in the correct order, reducing downtime and maintaining business continuity. Recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives can be configured to meet organizational requirements, minimizing operational disruption during outages.

Site Recovery integrates with Azure monitoring and alerting services, providing dashboards, replication health insights, and proactive notifications for potential issues. Failback to on-premises infrastructure is supported after resolution, maintaining operational flexibility. Centralized reporting allows tracking replication health, compliance, and recovery readiness, reducing administrative burden and supporting audit requirements. The solution bridges on-premises and Azure resources, offering scalable, resilient, and auditable disaster recovery.

Local backups and manual virtual machine exports are traditional methods of protecting data and workloads, but they have significant limitations that make them insufficient for modern hybrid disaster recovery strategies. Local backups typically involve copying files, system images, or virtual machine snapshots to on-premises storage, such as external drives, network-attached storage, or backup servers. While this approach can provide a basic level of protection against accidental deletion, hardware failure, or software corruption, it lacks the capabilities required for continuous availability and rapid recovery. Local backups do not provide real-time or near-real-time replication of data, meaning that any changes made after the last backup are not captured, which increases the risk of data loss. Additionally, local backups do not include orchestration features, which automate the sequence of actions required to bring systems online after a failure. Without orchestration, recovery is entirely manual, requiring administrators to identify the affected systems, restore files or virtual machines individually, reconfigure network settings, and verify system integrity, all of which significantly increases downtime. Furthermore, local backups generally lack test failover capabilities, making it difficult to verify that backup copies are fully functional and can be successfully restored in a disaster scenario. Organizations often discover issues only when attempting an actual recovery, which can result in unexpected delays or failed restores.

Manual virtual machine exports suffer from similar challenges. Exporting a VM involves creating a copy of the virtual machine files, including configuration files and virtual disks, which can then be stored locally or transferred to another host. While this process can create a point-in-time backup of a VM, it is time-consuming and labor-intensive, particularly for large environments with multiple workloads. Manual exports are error-prone because administrators must ensure all virtual machine files are correctly included, and any changes made after the export are not captured. Unlike replication-based solutions, manual exports do not maintain ongoing synchronization between source and destination environments, leaving workloads at risk of data loss or inconsistency in the event of a failure. This makes manual exports unsuitable for hybrid disaster recovery, where continuity of operations across on-premises and cloud resources is critical. Hybrid recovery relies on up-to-date replicas, automated failover, and minimal downtime, capabilities that manual exports cannot provide.

In combination, local backups and manual VM exports are reactive solutions rather than proactive disaster recovery mechanisms. They provide a minimal safety net but are inefficient, slow, and prone to errors. They require significant administrative effort, and recovery times are extended due to the lack of automation and orchestration. Modern hybrid disaster recovery solutions, in contrast, leverage continuous replication, automated failover, and centralized management to ensure workloads remain synchronized, recoverable, and resilient to both localized and widespread failures.

While local backups and manual virtual machine exports offer some protection against data loss, they fall short in speed, reliability, and operational efficiency. Their lack of continuous replication, orchestration, test failover, and workload synchronization makes recovery slower, more complex, and more error-prone, rendering them inadequate for modern hybrid disaster recovery requirements. Effective protection today requires automated, replication-based solutions designed to minimize downtime and ensure business continuity across both on-premises and cloud environments.

Cluster Shared Volumes provide local high availability but do not extend to Azure. Site-wide failures leave workloads inaccessible, increasing operational risk.

Azure Site Recovery is the correct solution because it provides continuous replication, automated failover orchestration, test failover validation, monitoring integration, and minimal downtime, ensuring operational resilience and compliance in hybrid Windows Server environments.

Microsoft AZ-800 Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q121-135

Related posts: