Microsoft SC-100 Cybersecurity Architect Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q121-135
Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-100 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 121
A multinational retail company wants to implement identity governance for its employees and contractors. The organization needs to enforce least privilege access, provide just-in-time elevation for administrative roles, monitor access risks in real time, and integrate access reviews across on-premises and cloud systems. Which solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM) with access reviews and risk-based conditional access
B) Traditional Active Directory role assignment with manual approval workflows
C) Local administrator accounts on servers with time-limited passwords
D) VPN access with IP restrictions only
Answer: A
Explanation:
In modern enterprises with distributed environments, managing privileged access effectively is a critical security and compliance requirement. The multinational retail company described in the scenario requires a solution that enforces least privilege, provides just-in-time administrative elevation, monitors real-time risks, and integrates with both on-premises and cloud resources. Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM) combined with access reviews and risk-based Conditional Access provides all these capabilities, making Option A the most appropriate solution. PIM enables organizations to manage, control, and monitor access to important resources in the organization. It allows users to elevate privileges temporarily, which ensures that permanent high-level access is not unnecessarily assigned. This reduces the attack surface and mitigates the risk of credential compromise. Additionally, PIM integrates with Conditional Access to enforce MFA or block access based on sign-in risk, device compliance, and location, thereby providing a dynamic layer of security that aligns with Zero Trust principles.
Option B, relying on traditional Active Directory role assignment and manual workflows, is limited in several critical ways. It does not support real-time monitoring of risky sign-ins or automated enforcement of least privilege. Manual processes are prone to human error and are inefficient for large, distributed environments. They also lack integration with cloud resources, which is increasingly important as hybrid and SaaS-based services are widely adopted in enterprise contexts. The absence of automated risk evaluation and just-in-time access mechanisms means that Option B cannot meet the company’s operational and security objectives effectively.
Option C, using local administrator accounts on servers with time-limited passwords, is highly risky. While temporary passwords may provide some control, local accounts are difficult to manage at scale, especially across hundreds or thousands of systems. They offer no central auditing, no integration with cloud resources, and no adaptive security mechanisms. Attackers who gain access to local accounts can easily move laterally across the network. Moreover, the absence of risk-based controls, identity monitoring, and automated elevation mechanisms renders this option unsuitable for enterprise governance and compliance requirements.
Option D, using VPN access with IP restrictions, only controls network perimeter access. It does not provide identity governance or management of privileged roles. While IP-based restrictions can limit the origin of connections, they do not enforce least privilege or just-in-time access. They also fail to provide visibility into who is accessing sensitive resources or the risk associated with those access attempts. VPN-only solutions cannot integrate with cloud applications effectively and are insufficient for managing administrative privileges across on-premises and cloud environments.
Question 122
A healthcare provider is seeking to secure patient data stored across Microsoft 365, on-premises servers, and third-party cloud applications. The provider wants automated classification of sensitive data, enforcement of protection policies, monitoring for insider risks, and integration with compliance reporting. Which solution is the most suitable?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Insider Risk Management
B) Local file server permissions with manual access reviews
C) Encrypted USB drives for all sensitive patient records
D) VPN access to on-premises systems only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Healthcare organizations face strict regulatory requirements, such as HIPAA, that mandate protection of sensitive patient data. Option A, Microsoft Purview Information Protection combined with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Insider Risk Management, directly addresses these requirements by offering comprehensive data governance, classification, and protection capabilities. Purview automatically identifies and classifies sensitive information using predefined sensitive information types, patterns, and custom policies. This ensures that patient data is labeled consistently across cloud and on-premises environments. Integration with DLP allows the provider to enforce access controls, prevent unauthorized sharing, and ensure compliance with regulatory mandates. Insider Risk Management monitors user activity to detect anomalous behaviors, such as unusual data access or movement, providing real-time alerts for potential data breaches or compliance violations.
Option B, relying solely on local file server permissions with manual access reviews, is insufficient. Manual reviews are labor-intensive, prone to error, and do not scale for large organizations. This method also does not provide automated classification or real-time monitoring, leaving gaps in compliance enforcement. Furthermore, it does not extend to cloud-hosted resources or third-party applications, which are increasingly used in healthcare environments.
Option C, using encrypted USB drives, protects data in transit but does not address ongoing data protection within cloud and on-premises systems. It also fails to support automated classification, policy enforcement, or monitoring for insider risks. The solution is reactive and highly fragmented, offering limited enterprise-wide control.
Option D, using VPN access to on-premises systems only, provides a secure connection but does not manage or protect data at the application or file level. It cannot classify data, enforce DLP policies, or monitor user behavior in real time. VPN access alone is inadequate for compliance in complex hybrid environments.
Overall, Option A ensures enterprise-wide data classification, automated policy enforcement, insider risk detection, and reporting. It provides a unified solution that addresses regulatory, operational, and security requirements for healthcare data governance.
Question 123
A financial services company is planning to adopt a Zero Trust architecture. The organization wants to continuously evaluate user risk, device compliance, and application access in real time. Additionally, the company requires conditional access policies that dynamically enforce MFA and block high-risk sign-ins. Which solution best aligns with these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional password expiration policies for all accounts
C) Static VPN access with IP restrictions
D) Local account provisioning with no risk monitoring
Answer: A
Explanation:
Implementing Zero Trust requires continuous verification of identity, device posture, and access context. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance, provides adaptive access control based on multiple real-time signals. It evaluates sign-in risk by analyzing unusual behaviors, location, device health, and other indicators. Conditional Access policies allow enforcement of multi-factor authentication (MFA), blocking high-risk sign-ins, and ensuring that only compliant devices can access sensitive resources. This approach reduces the risk of credential compromise, lateral movement, and unauthorized access, fulfilling the requirements for a Zero Trust framework.
Option B, traditional password expiration policies, relies on static authentication and does not adapt to dynamic risk signals. Password-only controls are vulnerable to phishing, credential reuse, and other attacks. They fail to provide real-time enforcement or device compliance checks.
Option C, static VPN access with IP restrictions, limits connectivity based on network location but does not evaluate identity risk, enforce MFA dynamically, or verify device compliance. It offers a perimeter-based control that is inconsistent with Zero Trust principles, which assume that no user or device is inherently trusted.
Option D, local account provisioning without risk monitoring, provides no adaptive security or real-time evaluation. Local accounts are difficult to manage, audit, and scale in large distributed environments, and they do not integrate with cloud services or conditional access policies.
Option A is the only choice that enables continuous evaluation of risk, device compliance, and adaptive enforcement, supporting a comprehensive Zero Trust implementation. It aligns with modern security principles and meets both operational and regulatory requirements in financial services.
Question 124
A global logistics company wants to secure access to its fleet management and supply chain applications for field operators using mobile devices. The company needs to enforce MFA, ensure devices are compliant, and prevent access from compromised devices or unusual locations. Which solution best meets this requirement?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with device compliance and MFA enforcement
B) Shared passwords across mobile devices
C) Local device passwords only
D) VPN access without identity checks
Answer: A
Explanation:
In distributed logistics operations, workers use mobile devices in diverse locations with varying network security. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with device compliance and MFA enforcement, is the optimal solution. It ensures that users can access applications only from devices that meet compliance requirements, enforces multi-factor authentication, and blocks access if sign-in risk is high. Conditional Access evaluates multiple signals such as device health, location, user behavior, and app sensitivity. This adaptive approach is critical in logistics, where mobile devices are used outside the corporate network and may be exposed to higher security risks.
Option B, using shared passwords, eliminates accountability, increases the risk of credential compromise, and fails to provide device compliance checks or adaptive controls. It is highly insecure for operational applications.
Option C, relying on local device passwords, protects only the device but does not enforce identity verification, MFA, or risk-based access. Sensitive logistics systems remain vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Option D, VPN access without identity checks, ensures a secure network channel but does not validate the identity of the user or device, nor enforce compliance. Perimeter-based solutions cannot adapt to user or device risk, leaving operations exposed.
Option A delivers dynamic, identity-driven, and device-aware access control, protecting sensitive logistics applications while supporting mobility and operational efficiency.
Question 125
A higher education institution is providing access to research applications for faculty, students, and visiting scholars. The institution needs to automate onboarding, enforce least privilege, provide risk-based access controls, and integrate with access reviews across Microsoft 365 and cloud research systems. Which solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access
B) Manual account creation for all researchers
C) Shared credentials for all research applications
D) VPN access with static passwords only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Modern academic environments require scalable, secure access to sensitive research systems. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access, provides automated lifecycle management for internal and external users, ensuring least privilege access. It allows organizations to assign access packages, automate approval workflows, and periodically review access rights. Conditional Access evaluates risk and enforces MFA or device compliance, ensuring that only authorized users can access sensitive applications. Entitlement management also simplifies onboarding and offboarding of external researchers, reducing administrative burden and maintaining compliance with research data protection standards.
Option B, manual account creation, is labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to scale. It cannot enforce risk-based policies or automate access reviews.
Option C, shared credentials, eliminates accountability, increases the likelihood of unauthorized access, and violates compliance and auditing requirements.
Option D, VPN with static passwords, provides network-level access only and does not enforce identity verification, risk evaluation, or least privilege policies.
Option A is the only solution that combines automation, risk-based access control, and governance for academic research environments. It ensures secure, scalable, and compliant access across cloud and on-premises systems.
Question 126
A global manufacturing company wants to monitor and respond to security incidents across endpoints, cloud workloads, and identities in real time. The organization requires integration of alerts, automated investigation, and response actions to reduce the workload on the security operations team. Which Microsoft solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Defender XDR unified portal
B) Local antivirus software with manual threat analysis
C) VPN access with IP restrictions only
D) Microsoft Intune device compliance policies
Answer: A
Explanation:
Modern manufacturing environments increasingly rely on distributed IT and OT systems, often combining endpoints, cloud workloads, and identity services. The organization in this scenario needs a solution capable of monitoring security events across all these domains in real time. Option A, Microsoft Defender XDR unified portal, is the most suitable solution. Defender XDR integrates signals from endpoints, cloud workloads, and identities, providing a unified view of incidents. It enables SOC teams to detect threats earlier, investigate them across different environments, and respond automatically to reduce the burden on analysts. Features such as automated investigation, alert correlation, attack chain visualization, and integrated playbooks allow the security team to act efficiently and proactively. This solution also supports real-time detection and response, making it ideal for manufacturing organizations where operational continuity is critical.
Option B, relying on local antivirus software with manual threat analysis, is limited to individual endpoints. It cannot correlate events across the network, cloud services, or identity platforms, and relies heavily on manual review. Such a setup leaves gaps in visibility and response, which is insufficient for a modern distributed environment.
Option C, VPN access with IP restrictions only, provides basic perimeter security but does not offer threat detection, automated investigation, or response. It cannot monitor identities or cloud workloads and lacks the adaptive capabilities required for SOC operations.
Option D, Microsoft Intune device compliance policies, focuses on ensuring devices meet security standards but does not provide threat detection, automated incident response, or unified monitoring across workloads and identities. While Intune contributes to device posture, it is only one component of a broader security strategy.
In conclusion, Option A offers a comprehensive, integrated, and automated security operations experience that meets the organization’s requirements for real-time monitoring, cross-workload investigation, and response.
Question 127
A healthcare organization needs to protect sensitive patient data across Microsoft 365, on-premises databases, and SaaS applications. They require automated classification, policy enforcement, reporting, and integration with insider risk management. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection with DLP and Insider Risk Management
B) Local access control lists on file servers
C) Encrypted USB drives for data transfers
D) VPN access only to on-premises systems
Answer: A
Explanation:
Healthcare organizations handle highly sensitive patient data, which must comply with regulations such as HIPAA. Option A, Microsoft Purview Information Protection combined with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Insider Risk Management, is the best choice. Purview automatically identifies and classifies sensitive data based on built-in or custom sensitive information types. This ensures consistent labeling across cloud and on-premises systems. Integration with DLP allows enforcement of policies to prevent unauthorized sharing or leakage of sensitive data. Insider Risk Management monitors user activities to detect potential threats, such as unusual downloads or sharing of sensitive information. Together, these capabilities provide a comprehensive, automated approach to data governance and security.
Option B, relying on local access control lists, is insufficient. ACLs require manual configuration and review, do not extend to cloud resources or SaaS applications, and lack automated detection of sensitive data usage. They are prone to human error and cannot scale effectively in modern hybrid environments.
Option C, encrypted USB drives, protect data only during physical transfer. They do not provide enterprise-wide protection, automated classification, or policy enforcement. Insider risk monitoring is not possible with isolated devices, leaving gaps in compliance and security oversight.
Option D, VPN access only, secures network connections but does not protect data at the application or content level. VPNs cannot classify, label, or prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information. They also do not integrate with insider risk management or compliance reporting tools.
Therefore, Option A provides a unified, automated, and regulatory-compliant solution for protecting sensitive healthcare data across hybrid environments.
Question 128
A multinational financial company wants to implement a Zero Trust strategy across identity, device, network, and application layers. The organization requires continuous evaluation of risk, dynamic enforcement of access policies, and protection against credential compromise. Which Microsoft solution best supports this requirement?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional Active Directory password policies
C) Static VPN access with IP filtering
D) Local accounts with manual provisioning and no monitoring
Answer: A
Explanation:
A Zero Trust strategy requires constant verification of identity and device posture, adaptive policy enforcement, and protection against credential compromise. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance, provides continuous evaluation of user and device risk. Policies dynamically enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA), block high-risk sign-ins, and ensure that only compliant devices can access sensitive resources. This approach ensures that the organization can maintain least privilege access while protecting critical financial information. Conditional Access evaluates multiple signals, including user behavior, device health, geolocation, and application sensitivity. This enables adaptive decision-making in real time, which is critical for large financial organizations with a distributed workforce.
Option B, traditional Active Directory password policies, relies on static credential rules, which cannot evaluate risk dynamically. Password policies alone do not address compromised accounts, unusual behavior, or device compliance, and they are insufficient for modern Zero Trust strategies.
Option C, static VPN access with IP filtering, provides network-level security but does not evaluate identity, device health, or user behavior. VPNs offer a perimeter-focused approach, which is inconsistent with Zero Trust principles, where no user or device is trusted by default.
Option D, local accounts with manual provisioning, cannot enforce adaptive policies or risk evaluation. Manual processes are error-prone and do not scale across distributed or cloud-integrated environments.
Question 129
A global retail company wants to manage external partner access to its Microsoft 365 applications and SaaS resources. The organization needs automated onboarding, access package assignment, time-limited access, and periodic reviews for compliance. Which solution is most suitable?
A) Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access
B) Manual account creation for external partners
C) Shared credentials for all external users
D) VPN access with static passwords only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Managing external partner access is complex, especially in global enterprises with distributed operations. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access, allows organizations to create access packages that define what resources external users can access, how long access lasts, and what approvals are required. Time-bound access ensures least privilege, while automated workflows and integration with Conditional Access enforce risk-based policies, MFA, and device compliance. Periodic access reviews can be automated, providing ongoing compliance with regulatory or contractual requirements. This centralized, automated approach reduces administrative burden and ensures governance while allowing secure collaboration with external users.
Option B, manual account creation, is labor-intensive and prone to human error. It cannot enforce automated reviews, least privilege, or adaptive policies. Scaling for large partner ecosystems is highly challenging.
Option C, shared credentials, removes accountability and increases the risk of unauthorized access. It also violates compliance requirements and does not support automated governance or access expiration.
Option D, VPN access with static passwords, secures the network but does not control what resources users can access, nor does it enforce Conditional Access, MFA, or periodic reviews. It cannot manage identity or entitlement risk.
Thus, Option A provides the only fully automated, scalable, and compliant solution for external partner access management in a global enterprise environment.
Question 130
A higher education institution needs to provide secure access to research applications for students, faculty, and visiting scholars. The organization requires automated onboarding, just-in-time access, risk-based policies, and integration with access reviews across Microsoft 365 and cloud research systems. Which solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access
B) Manual account creation for all researchers
C) Shared credentials for research applications
D) VPN access with static passwords only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Academic institutions face challenges managing access to research applications due to diverse user populations, frequent onboarding/offboarding, and regulatory requirements. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access, provides a scalable, automated solution that enables just-in-time access, time-limited permissions, and risk-based access enforcement. Access packages allow administrators to define resource access, approvals, and expiration dates. Conditional Access ensures that access is granted only from compliant devices, that MFA is enforced where necessary, and that risky sign-ins are blocked. Automated access reviews help maintain compliance with research data policies.
Option B, manual account creation, is labor-intensive, error-prone, and does not scale. It cannot integrate with Conditional Access or enforce risk-based policies.
Option C, shared credentials, reduces accountability and increases the risk of unauthorized access. It also violates compliance and auditing requirements for research data.
Option D, VPN access with static passwords, secures network connectivity but does not control resource access, enforce identity-based policies, or integrate with automated access reviews. It fails to provide comprehensive governance.
Option A ensures secure, automated, and compliant access management for academic research systems, meeting all operational, security, and governance requirements.
Question 131
A global consulting firm wants to monitor and protect sensitive client data across Microsoft 365, on-premises servers, and multiple SaaS platforms. The organization needs automated classification, encryption, policy enforcement, and reporting, along with insider risk monitoring. Which Microsoft solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection with DLP and Insider Risk Management
B) Local file server permissions with manual auditing
C) Encrypted USB drives for data transfers
D) VPN access to on-premises systems only
Answer: A
Explanation:
In large consulting firms, protecting sensitive client data across hybrid and cloud environments is critical for compliance, reputation, and operational integrity. Option A, Microsoft Purview Information Protection combined with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Insider Risk Management, offers a comprehensive solution for this scenario. Purview automatically identifies and classifies sensitive data across multiple environments, including Microsoft 365, on-premises servers, and SaaS platforms. Classification can be based on predefined sensitive information types, regulatory templates, or custom policies tailored to organizational needs. DLP policies then enforce access controls, encryption, and restrictions on sharing to prevent unauthorized exposure of sensitive information. Insider Risk Management monitors user behavior for anomalies such as unusual downloads, email forwarding, or attempts to exfiltrate data. These features collectively provide real-time visibility into potential risks while maintaining compliance with client and regulatory requirements.
Option B, using local file server permissions with manual auditing, is limited and labor-intensive. It does not extend protection to cloud-based applications or SaaS platforms, and manual audits are prone to errors and delays. This option cannot provide automated classification or proactive monitoring of insider risks, leaving critical gaps in data protection.
Option C, encrypted USB drives, provides only a limited, physical layer of protection. While they secure data in transit, they do not address ongoing access controls, classification, or automated policy enforcement in enterprise environments. Additionally, insider risk monitoring and reporting are not supported.
Option D, VPN access alone, secures network connections but does not protect the data itself or enforce granular controls based on sensitivity or risk. VPNs do not provide encryption, classification, or monitoring for insider activity, which are essential in managing sensitive client information.
Therefore, Option A is the only solution that offers an integrated, automated, and comprehensive approach to data protection, policy enforcement, and insider risk management, making it the most suitable choice for a global consulting firm.
Question 132
A financial institution wants to implement a Zero Trust security model across identity, endpoints, applications, and networks. The institution requires continuous evaluation of user risk, device compliance, and access patterns, with dynamic enforcement of policies such as MFA and sign-in blocking for high-risk activity. Which solution best supports these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional password expiration policies
C) VPN access with static IP restrictions
D) Local accounts with no monitoring or adaptive controls
Answer: A
Explanation:
Zero Trust security requires continuous validation of users, devices, and access contexts, ensuring that no entity is trusted by default. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance, provides the most effective framework for achieving these objectives. Conditional Access policies dynamically evaluate multiple signals, including user behavior, device posture, geolocation, and application sensitivity. Based on these signals, policies enforce MFA, restrict access, or block risky sign-ins. Device compliance integration ensures that only managed or secure devices can access critical resources, while risk-based policies allow for adaptive responses to potential threats, such as unusual login patterns or credential compromises.
Option B, traditional password expiration policies, provides minimal security, relying solely on static credentials. Password policies do not adapt to dynamic risk, cannot enforce MFA contextually, and offer no visibility into device compliance or unusual access patterns. This approach does not meet modern Zero Trust requirements.
Option C, VPN access with static IP restrictions, is perimeter-based and cannot dynamically evaluate identity or device risk. VPNs only secure network connectivity but cannot enforce adaptive security controls, making them incompatible with Zero Trust principles, which assume that network location alone does not imply trust.
Option D, local accounts without monitoring, provide neither adaptive policy enforcement nor continuous evaluation of risk. Manual management of local accounts lacks scalability, auditing capabilities, and integration with cloud or SaaS applications. This option does not support identity-driven, risk-aware security.
Option A uniquely combines identity verification, device compliance checks, and real-time risk evaluation to enforce adaptive security policies across all layers of a financial institution’s IT environment, fulfilling the essential Zero Trust requirements.
Question 133
A healthcare provider needs to protect patient information across Microsoft 365, on-premises databases, and SaaS applications. The provider wants automated classification, content labeling, DLP policy enforcement, and monitoring for insider threats. Which solution is the most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Purview Information Protection with Data Loss Prevention and Insider Risk Management
B) File server ACLs with manual monitoring
C) USB encryption for sensitive files
D) VPN access to on-premises systems only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Healthcare organizations must secure sensitive patient data to comply with HIPAA and other regulatory requirements. Option A, Microsoft Purview Information Protection with DLP and Insider Risk Management, provides a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution. It automatically classifies and labels sensitive information, applying policy enforcement rules across emails, documents, and collaboration tools. DLP policies prevent unauthorized sharing of data, while Insider Risk Management monitors for anomalous behavior such as mass downloads, copying sensitive information, or sharing with unauthorized recipients. This combination allows proactive detection, mitigation, and reporting of risks, ensuring compliance while maintaining operational efficiency.
Option B, using file server ACLs with manual monitoring, is limited and error-prone. It cannot extend protection to cloud-based environments or SaaS applications, and manual monitoring does not provide real-time alerts or automated compliance enforcement.
Option C, USB encryption, protects data only during physical transfer but does not control access or detect insider risk. It is reactive rather than proactive and cannot scale for enterprise-wide compliance monitoring.
Option D, VPN access, secures network connectivity but does not enforce policies at the data or application layer. It cannot classify content, monitor insider threats, or prevent unauthorized access to sensitive patient data.
Option A is the only solution that provides comprehensive, automated protection, ensuring regulatory compliance and mitigating insider risks across hybrid and cloud environments.
Question 134
A multinational manufacturing company wants to manage privileged access for administrators across on-premises servers, cloud workloads, and SaaS applications. The company requires just-in-time elevation, least privilege enforcement, automated access reviews, and integration with risk-based conditional access policies. Which solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management with Conditional Access
B) Traditional Active Directory administrative roles with manual approvals
C) Local administrator accounts with time-limited passwords
D) VPN access with IP restrictions only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Privileged access management is critical in manufacturing environments where administrators require elevated permissions to perform operational tasks. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID Privileged Identity Management (PIM) with Conditional Access, enables just-in-time elevation, enforcing least privilege access by granting administrative rights only when necessary. PIM allows automated access reviews, ensuring that permissions are periodically validated, and integrates with Conditional Access to enforce MFA or block access based on risk signals. Real-time monitoring and reporting provide visibility into privileged activity, mitigating risks such as credential compromise or insider threats. This solution scales across on-premises, cloud, and SaaS environments, providing centralized governance for all privileged accounts.
Option B, using traditional Active Directory administrative roles with manual approvals, is prone to human error, lacks integration with cloud applications, and does not provide real-time risk-based enforcement. Manual processes are time-consuming and cannot scale effectively.
Option C, local administrator accounts with time-limited passwords, only partially addresses least privilege. It is difficult to manage at scale, lacks central auditing, and provides no automated risk evaluation or conditional access integration.
Option D, VPN access with IP restrictions, secures network connectivity but does not enforce privileged access policies, least privilege, or risk-based controls. It does not manage or monitor administrator activity across hybrid environments.
Option A is the only solution that provides comprehensive, automated, and adaptive privileged access management across on-premises and cloud systems.
Question 135
A higher education institution wants to manage access for students, faculty, and external collaborators to cloud research applications. The institution requires automated onboarding, role-based access, time-limited permissions, conditional access enforcement, and integration with periodic access reviews. Which solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access
B) Manual account creation for all users
C) Shared credentials for research applications
D) VPN access with static passwords only
Answer: A
Explanation:
Educational institutions must provide secure, scalable access to research applications for diverse user populations. Option A, Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management with Conditional Access, allows administrators to create access packages for different roles, defining which resources users can access, how long access lasts, and approval workflows. Conditional Access ensures MFA enforcement, device compliance checks, and risk-based access control. Automated periodic access reviews maintain compliance and minimize risk from stale permissions. This approach scales efficiently for large, dynamic academic environments with internal and external users.
Option B, manual account creation, is labor-intensive, error-prone, and does not enforce risk-based policies or automate access reviews.
Option C, shared credentials, reduces accountability, increases the risk of unauthorized access, and violates compliance requirements.
Option D, VPN access with static passwords, secures network connections but does not control resource access, enforce identity policies, or integrate with automated governance workflows.
Option A ensures secure, automated, and compliant access for academic research users, meeting operational, governance, and security requirements.
Option A, Microsoft Entra ID entitlement management combined with Conditional Access, represents a comprehensive and modern approach to managing access in educational institutions, particularly for research environments where users often include a mixture of faculty, students, visiting scholars, and external collaborators. In such settings, access needs are highly dynamic: users join and leave projects frequently, roles change, and the sensitivity of data can vary significantly across applications and resources. Traditional manual or static access methods are ill-suited to handle this level of complexity. Entitlement management allows administrators to define and enforce role-based access policies in a structured and automated way, ensuring that users receive the exact level of access required for their role and nothing more.
By using access packages, administrators can assign a bundle of resources, such as research databases, lab environments, application tools, or file repositories, to a user or group based on their role. Each access package can define the scope of access, the duration for which it is valid, and the necessary approvals required before access is granted. This automated workflow ensures that permissions are not left open indefinitely and that temporary or project-based access is automatically revoked when no longer needed. For example, a visiting researcher may need access to a specific set of laboratory applications for a six-month project. Entitlement management can provision this access automatically and revoke it after the designated period, eliminating the risk of stale accounts or unused permissions that could be exploited by malicious actors.
Conditional Access further strengthens this model by ensuring that access is granted only under safe conditions. Policies can enforce multi-factor authentication, verify that devices meet compliance standards, and block access if risk indicators are detected, such as sign-ins from unusual locations or suspicious devices. Risk-based Conditional Access ensures that users can access resources seamlessly when conditions are low risk while adding additional verification steps when anomalies are detected. This reduces friction for legitimate users while maintaining strong security for sensitive resources. For research institutions where collaboration is essential, this balance between usability and security is critical; users can focus on their work without being hindered by excessive authentication steps, but security is enforced when threats are detected.
Another key advantage of Option A is its ability to support large-scale, diverse environments. Academic institutions often have thousands of users with varying roles, from undergraduate students needing temporary access to software tools, to postdoctoral researchers handling sensitive datasets, to administrative staff managing compliance workflows. Entitlement management can automate these diverse access needs efficiently, reducing administrative burden, minimizing errors, and ensuring consistent application of security policies. It also supports external users, such as collaborators from other universities or partner organizations, by allowing administrators to provision guest accounts with controlled and temporary access. This ensures that external collaborators can contribute effectively without creating long-term security vulnerabilities.
Automated access reviews are another critical component of this approach. Periodic reviews help ensure that permissions remain appropriate and that users who have changed roles or left the institution do not retain unnecessary access. These reviews can be scheduled automatically and routed to supervisors or project leads for approval, reducing manual overhead and increasing compliance with institutional policies and regulatory requirements. Stale permissions are a significant security risk in academic settings, as they provide potential entry points for attackers, particularly when research data or intellectual property is involved. By integrating access reviews into the entitlement management process, institutions can maintain strict governance and minimize the risk of over-permissioned accounts.
Option A also provides detailed reporting and auditing capabilities, which are crucial for research institutions subject to internal governance or external regulations. Logs of access requests, approvals, access revocations, and risk-based Conditional Access events provide transparency into who accessed what resources, when, and under what conditions. This level of visibility supports investigations, compliance audits, and internal governance reviews. In environments handling sensitive research data, grant-funded projects, or human subject information, the ability to demonstrate accountability and oversight is critical. Entitlement management with Conditional Access ensures that these requirements are met without placing an excessive burden on IT staff or faculty.
Option B, manual account creation for all users, is not practical for institutions with large and dynamic populations. Each account must be created individually by administrators, which is time-consuming and prone to errors. Manual processes are often inconsistent, with varying permissions assigned depending on the administrator’s judgment. There is no built-in mechanism to automate periodic reviews or enforce temporary access expirations. Stale accounts, excessive permissions, or incorrect access assignments become likely, significantly increasing the security risk. Manual account creation also does not integrate with Conditional Access or risk-based policies, meaning that accounts are granted regardless of device compliance, risk indicators, or contextual anomalies. For institutions where user populations change frequently, this approach is operationally inefficient, prone to security gaps, and unable to scale effectively.
Option C, shared credentials for research applications, is inherently insecure and violates fundamental security principles. While sharing credentials may appear convenient in collaborative research settings, it eliminates accountability. It becomes impossible to determine which individual performed a particular action, making auditing, investigation, and compliance impossible. Shared credentials also increase the likelihood of compromise: if one user’s system is breached, all users sharing the credential are affected. This approach fails to support least privilege principles, as each individual with access via shared credentials may have capabilities far beyond what is necessary for their role. Shared credentials also do not integrate with Conditional Access, MFA, or risk-based policies, leaving the institution highly vulnerable to external attacks, insider threats, and accidental misuse of sensitive resources. For research environments handling sensitive data, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information, shared credentials present a critical security risk.
Option D, VPN access with static passwords only, is similarly insufficient. While VPNs encrypt network traffic and protect data in transit, they do not control access at the application or resource level. Anyone who possesses the static VPN credentials can access the entire network, potentially bypassing granular access controls. This method does not support identity verification, risk assessment, multi-factor authentication, or device compliance enforcement. It also does not provide workflow automation for temporary access, approvals, or access reviews. VPNs alone offer a limited security layer that addresses network encryption but not identity governance or application-level security, which are essential in academic research environments with distributed users and sensitive resources. The reliance on static passwords further exacerbates security risks, as passwords can be easily compromised through phishing, brute-force attacks, or credential leaks.