Microsoft MS-900 Microsoft 365 Fundamentals Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q76-90
Visit here for our full Microsoft MS-900 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question76
A global manufacturing company is migrating its intellectual property, engineering designs, and operational data to Microsoft 365. Engineers need access from on-site desktops, laptops, and remote devices. The company must enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA), device compliance, conditional access policies based on risk, and prevent accidental or malicious data sharing with external partners. Which Microsoft 365 solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with device compliance and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
B) Traditional on-premises Active Directory with VPN access
C) Basic password policies with email verification for document access
D) Local device accounts without management or monitoring
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The scenario involves protecting highly sensitive engineering and operational data while enabling secure collaboration across multiple locations and devices. Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access provides adaptive, context-aware access control by evaluating each sign-in in real time based on user identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals. MFA ensures that even if credentials are compromised, unauthorized users cannot access resources. Device compliance policies, integrated with Intune, verify that endpoints meet corporate security requirements, such as encryption, patch management, and configuration standards.
Microsoft Purview DLP complements Conditional Access by monitoring and protecting sensitive information from accidental or intentional sharing. DLP policies can detect sensitive patterns, block inappropriate sharing, and alert administrators about policy violations. This ensures intellectual property remains secure while employees collaborate effectively.
Option B, on-premises Active Directory with VPN, provides network-level security but lacks cloud-native adaptive access, risk evaluation, and data loss prevention capabilities. Option C, basic passwords with email verification, is insufficient for sophisticated threats, offers no device compliance enforcement, and does not prevent data leaks. Option D, unmanaged local accounts, fails to provide centralized governance, auditing, or secure collaboration.
Option A is the only solution that integrates identity, device compliance, adaptive access, and data protection to meet the company’s operational and security requirements.
Question77
A healthcare provider is implementing Microsoft 365 to enable clinicians to access patient records and telemedicine platforms from personal mobile devices. The organization must ensure PHI protection, enforce encryption, prevent data leakage to personal apps, and enable selective wipe of corporate data without affecting personal content. Which Microsoft 365 capability best addresses these requirements?
A) Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies (APP)
B) BitLocker full-disk encryption
C) Local unmanaged accounts
D) Manual approval workflows for each access request
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In BYOD scenarios common in healthcare, application-level security is critical. Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies (APP) enforce security controls within corporate apps, such as Outlook, Teams, Word, and Excel, ensuring corporate data is encrypted, cannot be copied to personal apps, and can be selectively wiped if needed. This allows clinicians to use personal devices while protecting sensitive PHI and maintaining HIPAA and GDPR compliance.
BitLocker provides full-disk encryption but cannot differentiate between personal and corporate data, making selective wipe impossible. Local unmanaged accounts lack enforceable security policies, auditing, and compliance enforcement. Manual approval workflows are inefficient, error-prone, and cannot enforce real-time security or prevent data leakage.
Intune APP ensures robust application-level data protection, selective wipe capability, and secure access, balancing clinician convenience with regulatory compliance and privacy.
Question78
A multinational financial organization wants to implement least-privilege access, automated provisioning, standardized roles, delegated administration for regional offices, and centralized auditing for all Microsoft 365 resources. Which approach best achieves these objectives?
A) Enterprise Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) with automated provisioning and delegated administration
B) Regional administrators creating custom roles independently
C) Broad global access for all employees
D) Manual assignment and removal of access by local administrators
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Enterprise RBAC ensures that users receive only the permissions necessary for their roles, enforcing least-privilege access. Automated provisioning and deprovisioning guarantee that access is updated immediately during onboarding, role changes, or offboarding, reducing errors and risk of over-permissioned accounts. Delegated administration allows regional offices to manage local tasks without gaining global administrative privileges, maintaining centralized governance while allowing operational flexibility.
Option B leads to inconsistent permissions, privilege sprawl, and misalignment with corporate policies. Option C violates least-privilege principles, exposing sensitive systems unnecessarily. Option D is time-consuming, error-prone, and cannot provide reliable real-time auditing across multiple regions.
Option A delivers a structured, scalable, and auditable solution for enterprise access management.
Question79
A global bank wants to implement zero-trust access to its online banking and internal systems. Requirements include continuous authentication, device posture validation, risk-based adaptive access, and segmentation of sensitive workloads to prevent lateral movement. Which approach aligns best with zero-trust principles?
A) Continuously evaluate identity, device, and session context for each access request
B) Trust internal network traffic and rely on perimeter firewalls
C) Use strong passwords with periodic access reviews
D) Grant wide access after initial MFA
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Zero-trust assumes no implicit trust for any user or device, whether internal or external. Continuously evaluating identity, device, and session context ensures each request is dynamically authorized based on current risk signals. Adaptive access policies can enforce MFA, restrict access, and apply segmentation to sensitive workloads, preventing lateral movement if a compromise occurs. Segmentation ensures that access to highly sensitive systems, such as core banking databases, is isolated from general internal networks.
Option B relies on perimeter security, which is insufficient to prevent lateral movement or adapt to real-time threats. Option C does not provide dynamic risk-based controls and periodic reviews cannot prevent immediate threats. Option D violates zero-trust principles by trusting sessions indefinitely after initial authentication.
Option A fully implements zero-trust by ensuring continuous verification, adaptive enforcement, and device compliance checks, protecting sensitive banking systems.
Question80
A multinational consulting firm wants to secure Microsoft 365 access for employees across multiple regions and devices. The firm requires adaptive access controls, risk-based authentication, device compliance enforcement, and monitoring of unusual activity to prevent unauthorized access. Which Microsoft 365 capability satisfies these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional Active Directory password policies
C) VPN access with IP restrictions
D) Local accounts with manual provisioning
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access provides real-time evaluation of sign-ins and resource requests using multiple signals, including user risk, device compliance, location, and behavior anomalies. Adaptive policies dynamically enforce MFA, block high-risk access, or apply session controls. Integration with Intune ensures devices meet corporate security requirements before access is granted. Monitoring unusual activity allows detection of suspicious sign-ins or account compromise, enabling proactive response.
Option B cannot provide cloud-native adaptive access or risk evaluation. Option C secures only the network layer and does not enforce identity-based adaptive policies. Option D is unscalable, error-prone, and does not support dynamic access enforcement.
Option A integrates identity, device compliance, adaptive access, and monitoring, meeting the firm’s requirements for secure, global Microsoft 365 access.
Question81
A global pharmaceutical company is deploying Microsoft 365 to manage research data, clinical trial records, and sensitive regulatory documentation. Researchers access these resources from multiple countries and devices. The company requires secure external collaboration, enforcement of device compliance, conditional access based on risk, and auditability for compliance purposes. Which Microsoft 365 solution best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with device compliance and external collaboration policies
B) Traditional on-premises Active Directory with VPN access
C) Email-based approvals for each document
D) SharePoint on-premises with unrestricted external sharing
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In this scenario, the pharmaceutical company faces multiple security and compliance challenges. Researchers need access from a variety of devices and locations, often outside the corporate network, while regulatory bodies require strict control over sensitive clinical and research data. Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access offers a cloud-native, adaptive access control mechanism that evaluates each access attempt in real time. The system considers multiple signals including user identity, device compliance, location, and sign-in risk to determine whether access should be granted, require additional authentication, or be blocked.
Device compliance integration ensures that endpoints accessing corporate data meet predefined security criteria such as encryption, operating system version, configuration baselines, and threat protection. By enforcing device compliance, the organization can reduce the risk of data leakage or unauthorized access from unmanaged or compromised devices. External collaboration policies allow secure sharing with partners, vendors, and regulatory bodies. These policies define the level of access external users have, whether they can edit, view, or share content, ensuring that intellectual property and sensitive clinical data are protected.
Option B, using on-premises Active Directory with VPN access, lacks cloud-native risk-based decision-making and cannot provide real-time auditing or conditional access based on contextual signals. VPN access alone only secures the network layer and does not prevent unauthorized access to individual resources or enforce device compliance, leaving gaps in regulatory compliance. Option C, using email-based approvals for every document, is inefficient and unscalable, providing no dynamic risk evaluation or device posture verification, and it fails to centralize auditing. Option D, unrestricted SharePoint on-premises sharing, exposes sensitive data without any access restrictions, violating HIPAA, GDPR, and other regulatory frameworks.
Option A integrates identity verification, device compliance, adaptive access policies, and controlled external collaboration to meet the operational, security, and regulatory needs of a multinational pharmaceutical company, ensuring that sensitive research data remains protected while enabling efficient collaboration.
Question82
A global financial institution wants to enforce least-privilege access across its Microsoft 365 environment while maintaining operational flexibility for regional offices. The organization requires automated user provisioning, role standardization, delegated administration, and centralized auditing of access changes. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Enterprise Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) with automated provisioning and delegated administration
B) Allow regional administrators to create custom roles independently
C) Grant broad access to all employees globally
D) Manual assignment and removal of access by local administrators
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Enterprise RBAC provides a structured approach to access management, ensuring that users are granted permissions aligned with their job responsibilities. Implementing least-privilege access minimizes security risk by limiting unnecessary access to sensitive financial data and systems. Automated provisioning ensures that role assignments, onboarding, and offboarding happen consistently and in real time, reducing errors that could result in privilege escalation or unauthorized access.
Delegated administration allows regional offices to handle local user management without global administrative privileges, balancing security with operational needs. Centralized auditing provides visibility into access changes, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements such as SOX, GDPR, and PCI DSS. This approach creates a repeatable, auditable process that can be scaled globally without sacrificing security or operational efficiency.
Option B, allowing independent role creation by regional administrators, increases the likelihood of inconsistent permissions, privilege creep, and noncompliance with corporate policies. Option C, granting broad access globally, violates least-privilege principles, significantly increasing the organization’s attack surface and potential for data breaches. Option D, manual assignment by local administrators, is inefficient, error-prone, and lacks real-time visibility into access changes, undermining security and compliance efforts.
Enterprise RBAC with automated provisioning and delegated administration provides a scalable, auditable, and secure solution, balancing centralized governance with local operational flexibility, ensuring that financial data is protected without hindering business operations.
Question83
A healthcare organization is enabling clinicians to access patient records on personal mobile devices. The organization must protect sensitive data, enforce encryption, prevent data leakage to personal apps, and allow selective wiping of corporate data without affecting personal content. Which Microsoft 365 capability best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies (APP)
B) BitLocker full-disk encryption
C) Local unmanaged accounts
D) Manual access approvals for each app
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In BYOD healthcare environments, application-level security is crucial to protect patient health information (PHI) while maintaining clinician flexibility. Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies (APP) enforce security controls directly within corporate applications such as Outlook, Teams, and Office apps. APP ensures that corporate data is encrypted, cannot be copied or moved to personal applications, and can be selectively wiped if needed. This enables clinicians to maintain privacy over personal data while meeting regulatory requirements under HIPAA, GDPR, and local healthcare compliance frameworks.
BitLocker provides full-disk encryption but cannot differentiate between personal and corporate data, making selective wipe impractical. Local unmanaged accounts offer no control over data security or compliance enforcement, leaving PHI vulnerable to leakage or unauthorized access. Manual access approvals are inefficient, error-prone, and cannot provide real-time enforcement or auditing capabilities.
By implementing Intune APP, the organization can enforce encryption policies, control data movement, and selectively wipe corporate information without impacting personal content. This approach balances security, privacy, and operational flexibility while maintaining compliance across multiple devices and locations.
Question84
A global bank seeks to implement zero-trust access for online banking and internal systems. The bank requires continuous authentication, device posture validation, risk-based adaptive access, and segmentation of sensitive workloads to prevent lateral movement. Which approach aligns with zero-trust principles?
A) Continuously evaluate identity, device, and session context for each access request
B) Trust internal network traffic and rely on perimeter firewalls
C) Use strong passwords with periodic access reviews
D) Grant wide access after initial MFA authentication
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Zero-trust security operates under the assumption that no user, device, or network is inherently trusted. Continuous evaluation of identity, device, and session context allows dynamic access control for each request. Risk-based adaptive policies can enforce MFA, restrict access, or apply session limitations based on anomalies or device posture, reducing the risk of compromised credentials or devices. Segmentation isolates sensitive workloads, ensuring attackers cannot move laterally if a single account or device is compromised.
Option B relies on perimeter defenses and trusts internal traffic, which is inconsistent with zero-trust principles and vulnerable to insider threats or lateral movement by attackers. Option C, using passwords with periodic reviews, cannot provide real-time enforcement or dynamic access based on context or risk. Option D assumes trust after initial MFA, which exposes systems to post-authentication attacks or session hijacking.
Implementing continuous evaluation, adaptive policies, and workload segmentation ensures that the bank aligns fully with zero-trust principles, protecting sensitive financial systems while allowing secure access.
Question85
A multinational consulting firm requires secure Microsoft 365 access for employees across multiple regions and devices. The firm wants adaptive access controls, risk-based authentication, device compliance enforcement, and monitoring of unusual activity to prevent unauthorized access. Which Microsoft 365 capability best fulfills these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional Active Directory password policies
C) VPN access with IP restrictions
D) Local accounts with manual provisioning
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access provides a cloud-native framework for securing access to Microsoft 365 resources. It evaluates sign-ins in real time based on user identity, device compliance, location, and behavioral signals, enabling risk-based decisions. Adaptive policies enforce MFA or block access when thresholds are exceeded, preventing unauthorized access from high-risk sign-ins. Device compliance integration ensures that only approved, secure devices access corporate data, reducing exposure from untrusted endpoints.
Monitoring for unusual activity allows the firm to detect suspicious behavior proactively, enabling rapid response to potential security incidents. This combination of conditional access, risk-based policies, device compliance, and anomaly detection ensures a secure and scalable environment for a geographically distributed workforce.
Option B, traditional password policies, cannot provide dynamic, context-aware access or integrate with cloud applications. Option C, VPN with IP restrictions, only secures network traffic without evaluating identity or device posture. Option D, local accounts with manual provisioning, is unscalable, error-prone, and provides no real-time enforcement or auditing.
Option A integrates identity management, adaptive risk policies, device compliance, and monitoring to meet all security and operational requirements for secure, global Microsoft 365 access.
Question86
A global software company is moving its engineering and product teams to Microsoft 365 to enable collaboration across multiple regions. Teams use personal devices, and sensitive intellectual property must be protected. The company wants to enforce device compliance, conditional access based on risk, and secure external collaboration. Which Microsoft 365 solution best addresses these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with device compliance and external collaboration policies
B) Traditional on-premises Active Directory with VPN
C) Manual document-level access approvals via email
D) SharePoint on-premises with unrestricted external sharing
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The scenario presents a multinational company with highly sensitive intellectual property and a distributed workforce. Employees use personal devices to access resources, making it critical to enforce device compliance and secure access. Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access provides a cloud-native, adaptive access mechanism that evaluates sign-ins in real time. It uses multiple signals including user identity, device compliance, geolocation, and risk factors to dynamically enforce access policies.
Device compliance ensures only managed or secure devices can access sensitive resources. External collaboration policies allow secure sharing with partners or contractors without compromising internal intellectual property. Adaptive controls enforce MFA, conditional access, or block high-risk access attempts.
Option B, on-premises Active Directory with VPN, cannot provide cloud-native, context-aware, risk-based access and does not allow secure collaboration with external partners. Option C, manual approvals via email, is inefficient, error-prone, and does not enforce device compliance or real-time adaptive access. Option D, SharePoint on-premises with unrestricted external sharing, exposes critical IP to uncontrolled access, violating security and compliance principles.
Option A provides comprehensive identity and access management, ensuring security, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency for global collaboration on sensitive resources.
Understanding the Security Needs of a Multinational Workforce
In multinational organizations, employees frequently work across different countries, time zones, and networks, often using personal devices or connecting from locations outside corporate premises. When the organization holds sensitive intellectual property (IP), ensuring that access is secure while remaining operationally efficient is critical. Traditional access control methods, which rely on static credentials, VPN connectivity, or on-premises infrastructure, are inadequate in such a distributed environment. They lack real-time evaluation of risk, adaptive enforcement, and the ability to securely collaborate with external partners.
Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access addresses these challenges by offering a cloud-native, adaptive access solution that evaluates access requests dynamically. It ensures that only authorized users, using compliant devices, from trusted locations, and meeting risk criteria, can access critical resources.
Real-Time, Context-Aware Access Evaluation
Conditional Access policies assess multiple signals during sign-in attempts, including:
User identity and role: Ensures access aligns with organizational policies and assigned permissions.
Device compliance: Confirms that devices meet security standards, including management enrollment, OS version, patch level, encryption, and antivirus status.
Geolocation and network context: Evaluates access requests from unusual locations or untrusted networks.
Behavioral and risk analytics: Detects suspicious patterns, such as atypical logins, impossible travel scenarios, or rapid location changes.
This real-time, risk-aware evaluation enables the organization to enforce adaptive policies, such as requiring MFA, restricting access to certain applications, or blocking high-risk sign-ins altogether. By integrating these controls, organizations can maintain high security standards without overly restricting user productivity.
Device Compliance and Endpoint Security
Device compliance is a cornerstone of Conditional Access. In environments where employees use personal devices or connect remotely, enforcing compliance ensures that only devices that adhere to organizational security standards can access sensitive IP. For instance, a laptop lacking encryption or proper patching would be denied access, mitigating the risk of data leakage or malware compromise.
This capability addresses a fundamental weakness in traditional security models. Option B, relying on on-premises Active Directory with VPN, primarily controls network connectivity without assessing the device’s security posture. While VPNs create a secure channel, they do not prevent unpatched, unmanaged, or compromised devices from connecting to the corporate network. Conditional Access eliminates this gap by tying access directly to device compliance, rather than simply relying on network location or credentials.
External Collaboration Policies
Modern organizations frequently collaborate with partners, contractors, or vendors. While such collaboration is essential, unrestricted sharing can expose sensitive IP to risk. Microsoft Entra ID enables granular external collaboration policies, allowing organizations to securely share content while maintaining control. These policies can:
Restrict external sharing to specific domains or trusted partners.
Require MFA for external users.
Enforce device compliance for external devices where applicable.
Monitor and audit external access for compliance and regulatory purposes.
Option D, SharePoint on-premises with unrestricted external sharing, fails to provide these controls. Unrestricted sharing increases the likelihood of IP leaks, non-compliance with regulations, and accidental exposure of confidential data. Conditional Access’s external collaboration policies provide a balanced approach, facilitating legitimate collaboration while protecting sensitive resources.
Operational Efficiency and Scalability
Conditional Access is designed for cloud-first environments and scales effortlessly for multinational organizations. Policies can be centrally defined and applied globally, ensuring consistency in security enforcement across regions. This eliminates the need for repetitive configuration, reduces administrative burden, and ensures that security measures are applied uniformly.
Manual document-level approvals via email (Option C) are operationally inefficient. They require human intervention for each access request, introducing delays, errors, and inconsistencies. This method is particularly unsuitable for large organizations with high volumes of sensitive data and a distributed workforce.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Adaptive MFA, integrated into Conditional Access, enhances security by dynamically requiring additional verification based on assessed risk. Low-risk logins from compliant devices may proceed without MFA, while high-risk attempts trigger MFA or other protective measures. This reduces friction for legitimate users while ensuring that potentially compromised accounts are not exploited.
In contrast, Option B (on-premises Active Directory with VPN) cannot enforce adaptive MFA based on contextual risk. VPN-based solutions may implement MFA uniformly, but they lack the ability to evaluate multiple signals dynamically. Option C offers no automation or risk-based enforcement, and Option D provides no MFA controls at all, leaving external sharing vulnerable.
Continuous Monitoring and Threat Detection
Conditional Access integrates with Microsoft Entra Identity Protection to continuously monitor access attempts and detect suspicious activity. Alerts can be generated for impossible travel, multiple failed logins, or unusual device behavior, enabling rapid response to potential security incidents.
Traditional solutions like on-premises AD or manual email approvals lack this continuous monitoring capability. VPN logs (Option B) provide some visibility but require separate systems and analysis to detect anomalies. Manual approval processes (Option C) provide no automated threat detection, and unrestricted external sharing (Option D) inherently creates blind spots in monitoring, making it difficult to identify potential breaches promptly.
Regulatory Compliance and Auditability
Conditional Access supports compliance requirements by providing detailed logs of access events, policy enforcement, and external collaboration activities. Organizations can generate reports to demonstrate adherence to data protection regulations, internal policies, and industry standards.
Options B, C, and D offer limited auditing. On-premises AD may log authentication events, but it lacks integrated monitoring for cloud resources or external collaborators. Manual approvals rely on email records, which are difficult to track, analyze, and report systematically. Unrestricted external sharing provides almost no audit trail, creating significant compliance and legal risks.
Zero-Trust Security Model Alignment
Conditional Access embodies the principles of zero-trust security, which assumes no user or device is trusted by default. Access decisions are based on continuous verification, risk assessment, and compliance validation. By enforcing conditional policies for both internal and external users, Conditional Access minimizes the likelihood of unauthorized access and data compromise.
Other options do not align with zero-trust principles. On-premises AD with VPN (Option B) implicitly trusts users once they authenticate and connect to the corporate network. Manual email approvals (Option C) provide no adaptive enforcement or continuous validation. Unrestricted external sharing (Option D) grants unchecked trust to external users, creating significant security gaps.
User Experience Considerations
Despite its strong security posture, Conditional Access is designed to minimize disruption to users. Adaptive enforcement ensures that legitimate users face minimal friction while accessing resources, enhancing productivity and compliance. Manual approvals (Option C) and VPN-only solutions (Option B) can frustrate users with repetitive tasks or complex procedures. Unrestricted external sharing (Option D) may simplify access superficially but introduces risk that can lead to later operational and reputational consequences.
Question87
A multinational bank is adopting Microsoft 365 and wants to implement least-privilege access for all employees while maintaining operational flexibility across branches. The organization requires automated provisioning, role standardization, delegated administration, and centralized auditing. Which solution is most suitable?
A) Enterprise Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) with automated provisioning and delegated administration
B) Regional administrators independently creating custom roles
C) Granting broad global access to simplify operations
D) Manual assignment and removal of roles by branch administrators
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Enterprise RBAC enables organizations to enforce least-privilege access, ensuring employees only have permissions necessary for their roles. Automated provisioning allows seamless role assignments during onboarding or role changes, reducing errors and ensuring timely deprovisioning. Delegated administration enables branch administrators to manage local tasks without global administrative rights, preserving security and compliance. Centralized auditing tracks access changes and ensures regulatory compliance with standards such as PCI DSS, SOX, or GDPR.
Option B, allowing regional administrators to independently create roles, leads to inconsistent permissions and potential privilege sprawl. Option C, granting broad global access, violates least-privilege principles and exposes sensitive banking systems to unnecessary risk. Option D, manual assignment, is inefficient, error-prone, and lacks real-time auditing.
Option A balances centralized governance with local operational flexibility, providing scalable, auditable, and secure access management suitable for global banking operations.
Question88
A healthcare provider is enabling clinicians to access Microsoft 365 resources on personal devices. The organization must protect patient health information, prevent data leakage to personal apps, enforce encryption, and allow selective wiping of corporate data without affecting personal content. Which Microsoft 365 capability best meets these requirements?
A) Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies (APP)
B) BitLocker full-disk encryption
C) Local unmanaged device accounts
D) Manual access approvals for each app
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In BYOD healthcare environments, application-level protection is crucial to secure PHI while allowing clinicians to maintain personal device use. Microsoft Intune App Protection Policies enforce security policies within managed applications, ensuring corporate data is encrypted, cannot be copied to personal apps, and can be selectively wiped. APP allows clinicians to maintain privacy over personal data while complying with HIPAA, GDPR, and other regulations.
BitLocker encrypts the entire device, but cannot differentiate between corporate and personal data, preventing selective wiping. Local unmanaged accounts provide no enforcement of security or compliance policies, leaving PHI exposed. Manual access approvals are inefficient, error-prone, and cannot enforce real-time security policies.
Using Intune APP allows organizations to protect sensitive healthcare information while enabling clinician mobility, privacy, and compliance across multiple devices and regions.
Question89
A global bank wants to implement zero-trust access for its Microsoft 365 environment, including online banking applications and internal systems. Requirements include continuous authentication, device posture validation, risk-based adaptive access, and segmentation of sensitive workloads. Which approach aligns best with zero-trust principles?
A) Continuously evaluate identity, device, and session context for each access request
B) Trust internal network traffic and rely on perimeter firewalls
C) Strong passwords with periodic access reviews
D) Grant wide access after initial MFA authentication
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Zero-trust security assumes no implicit trust for any user, device, or network segment. Continuous evaluation of identity, device compliance, and session context allows dynamic access control for each request. Risk-based adaptive policies can enforce MFA, restrict access, or block high-risk attempts. Segmentation ensures sensitive systems, such as banking databases or internal financial applications, are isolated, limiting lateral movement if a compromise occurs.
Option B relies on perimeter trust, which violates zero-trust principles. Option C, strong passwords with periodic reviews, does not provide real-time risk-based access. Option D, granting broad access after initial MFA, assumes trust for the session duration, leaving the environment vulnerable.
Option A implements continuous verification, adaptive risk-based access, and workload segmentation, fully aligning with zero-trust principles and securing sensitive banking systems against modern threats.
Question90
A multinational consulting firm wants secure Microsoft 365 access for employees across multiple devices and regions. The firm requires adaptive access controls, risk-based authentication, device compliance enforcement, and monitoring for unusual activity to prevent unauthorized access. Which Microsoft 365 capability best addresses these requirements?
A) Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access with risk-based policies and device compliance
B) Traditional Active Directory password policies
C) VPN access with IP restrictions
D) Local accounts with manual provisioning
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access provides real-time, context-aware access evaluation for Microsoft 365 resources. It considers multiple signals including user risk, device compliance, location, and behavioral anomalies. Adaptive policies can enforce MFA, block high-risk access, or apply session restrictions, ensuring only verified users access corporate data. Device compliance integration ensures only secure devices are allowed, reducing exposure from untrusted endpoints.
Monitoring unusual activity enables the firm to detect suspicious behavior proactively, supporting timely response to security incidents. Option B, traditional password policies, cannot enforce adaptive access or evaluate risk dynamically. Option C, VPN with IP restrictions, only secures network traffic without evaluating identity or device context. Option D, manual local accounts, is unscalable and cannot provide dynamic enforcement or auditing.
Option A delivers a cloud-native, secure, and scalable solution for adaptive access, device compliance, and real-time monitoring, meeting the firm’s global operational and security requirements.
Overview of Modern Access Control Needs
In today’s enterprise environment, organizations are increasingly moving to cloud-first models, relying heavily on platforms like Microsoft 365 to facilitate productivity and collaboration. This shift has dramatically increased the attack surface, as employees access corporate resources from a diverse range of locations, devices, and networks. Traditional on-premises security models, which were designed for static, network-bound access, are insufficient in mitigating modern threats. Today, access control must be adaptive, context-aware, and capable of evaluating multiple risk factors in real time. Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access addresses these requirements by providing a cloud-native, scalable solution that secures access while maintaining operational efficiency and user convenience.
Real-Time Risk-Based Evaluation
One of the core capabilities of Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access is its ability to perform real-time, risk-based evaluations of sign-ins. Each access attempt is assessed using multiple signals, including:
User risk: Encompasses the likelihood that a user’s credentials have been compromised, based on historical login patterns, known threats, or anomalous behaviors.
Device compliance: Ensures the device meets organizational security standards, including encryption, OS updates, antivirus status, and managed device enrollment.
Location: Evaluates geolocation anomalies, such as access attempts from countries or regions where the user has never signed in before.
Behavioral anomalies: Detects unusual patterns in usage, such as multiple rapid login attempts, logins at abnormal hours, or simultaneous logins from geographically disparate locations.
This comprehensive evaluation allows Conditional Access to dynamically adjust authentication requirements. For instance, if a sign-in attempt is flagged as high risk due to an unfamiliar location or compromised credentials, the system can automatically enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or block access entirely. Conversely, low-risk sign-ins from compliant devices can proceed with minimal disruption, ensuring productivity is not hindered.
Comparison to Traditional Password Policies
Option B, traditional Active Directory password policies, focuses primarily on enforcing password complexity, expiration cycles, and history rules. While these measures reduce the risk of simple password attacks, they do not provide adaptive controls or real-time risk evaluation. Password policies alone cannot detect if a compromised account is being accessed from an unfamiliar device or location. Furthermore, traditional policies are static by nature, meaning they apply the same enforcement rules uniformly to all users, regardless of context. In a globally distributed, cloud-based environment, this approach is insufficient because threats can emerge dynamically and require nuanced, context-sensitive responses.
Device Compliance Enforcement
A major advantage of Conditional Access is its integration with device management platforms like Microsoft Intune. This enables the organization to enforce compliance policies at the device level. Only devices that are secured, updated, and enrolled in the management system are granted access to sensitive corporate resources. This reduces the likelihood of security incidents arising from unmanaged or compromised endpoints.
For example, if an employee attempts to access Microsoft 365 from a personal device that lacks required security patches, Conditional Access can block the sign-in or require remediation actions before allowing access. This proactive approach mitigates the risk posed by untrusted devices, which are a common entry point for malware, ransomware, and unauthorized access.
By contrast, Option C, VPN access with IP restrictions, only provides a layer of network security. While it can ensure that users access resources through a specific network range, it does not assess the device’s security posture or the identity of the user in a nuanced way. VPNs also introduce operational overhead, requiring configuration, maintenance, and management of endpoint clients, which becomes particularly complex in large, globally distributed organizations.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
Conditional Access policies can enforce MFA adaptively, depending on the level of risk detected. This means that low-risk logins from compliant devices in familiar locations might proceed without additional verification, while high-risk logins trigger an MFA challenge. Adaptive MFA strikes a balance between strong security and user convenience, ensuring that legitimate users are not frustrated by unnecessary authentication steps while maintaining protection against credential-based attacks.
Traditional AD password policies (Option B) and VPN access (Option C) cannot enforce this level of adaptive authentication. MFA in these systems, if deployed, is often static and uniformly applied, lacking the intelligence to respond to changing risk levels. Local accounts with manual provisioning (Option D) typically offer no MFA or adaptive controls at all, leaving the organization highly vulnerable to credential compromise.
Cloud-Native Integration and Scalability
Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access is inherently designed for cloud environments. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, Azure services, and third-party SaaS applications, providing centralized policy management and consistent enforcement across the organization. Policies are applied globally, ensuring that employees receive the same level of security regardless of their location.
On-premises AD password policies (Option B) are limited to environments where Active Directory is deployed and do not natively extend to cloud applications. VPNs (Option C) provide network-level access but require additional configuration and monitoring for each application or endpoint, which is cumbersome and error-prone. Local account management (Option D) is entirely unscalable, requiring manual setup and maintenance for every individual user and device, creating operational bottlenecks and increasing the likelihood of misconfigurations.
Monitoring, Detection, and Proactive Security
Conditional Access is tightly integrated with Microsoft Entra Identity Protection, which continuously monitors for suspicious activity. This enables proactive detection of potential threats, such as credential theft, insider threats, and anomalous behavior. Policies can be triggered automatically in response to detected risks, reducing the window of exposure and enabling rapid mitigation.
Traditional password policies provide no monitoring capabilities beyond password reset or lockout events. VPN solutions may generate logs but typically require separate monitoring tools and manual analysis to detect anomalous activity. Local accounts offer almost no automated monitoring, making them reactive rather than proactive, and leaving organizations exposed to delayed threat detection.
Operational Efficiency and Reduced Administrative Overhead
Centralized policy management in Conditional Access reduces administrative burden. IT teams can define policies once and have them enforced globally, minimizing repetitive configuration tasks. Automated enforcement of device compliance, MFA, and risk-based controls further reduces manual intervention and errors.
Alignment with Zero-Trust Principles
Conditional Access embodies zero-trust principles, which assume that no user or device should be trusted by default. Every access attempt is evaluated based on identity, device compliance, location, and risk, ensuring that only verified and compliant entities are granted access. This contrasts sharply with traditional AD password policies or VPN access, which often operate on implicit trust once credentials or network access are established. Local accounts with manual provisioning (Option D) entirely lack alignment with zero-trust principles, as access control is static and prone to human error.
Support for Regulatory Compliance and Auditing
Conditional Access also supports regulatory compliance efforts by providing detailed logging and auditing of access attempts. Organizations can track policy enforcement, monitor risk events, and generate reports to demonstrate adherence to compliance requirements.
Traditional methods offer limited auditability. AD password policies (Option B) log only authentication events, while VPN access (Option C) primarily logs network connectivity without context about device compliance or user behavior. Manual local accounts (Option D) provide almost no audit trails, making compliance reporting challenging and increasing risk in regulated industries.
User Experience Considerations
One of the strengths of Conditional Access is its ability to maintain a positive user experience while providing robust security. By applying adaptive authentication based on risk and device compliance, users are not unnecessarily interrupted during low-risk access attempts. This reduces friction and encourages secure behavior, whereas static password policies, VPN logins, and manual account provisioning often create barriers to productivity and frustrate users, potentially leading to risky workarounds.