Microsoft SC-200 Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q61-75
Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 61 :
Your organization wants to monitor risky sign-ins and compromised accounts, enforce conditional access policies automatically, and protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. Which Microsoft solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: C) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is specifically designed to address identity-related risks in modern enterprises. Compromised accounts and risky sign-ins are common attack vectors that can lead to data breaches, unauthorized access, and privilege escalation. Identity Protection leverages machine learning, behavioral analytics, and global threat intelligence to identify suspicious activities and assign risk scores to users and sign-ins.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint secures devices against malware and ransomware. While it provides excellent endpoint protection, it does not monitor user sign-ins or enforce risk-based conditional access policies.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity, identifies anomalies, and enforces data-sharing policies. However, it does not focus on identity risk or conditional access enforcement based on authentication behavior.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection integrates seamlessly with Conditional Access to enforce automated responses based on risk levels. For example, a user flagged as medium-risk can be prompted for multi-factor authentication (MFA), while high-risk users may be blocked or required to reset their passwords. Security teams can monitor dashboards to detect high-risk users, track trends, and investigate anomalies. This solution ensures that compromised accounts are quickly mitigated while maintaining compliance and operational efficiency.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel is a SIEM/SOAR solution for aggregating logs, analyzing threats, and orchestrating responses. While it can detect risky sign-ins when integrated with Azure AD, it cannot enforce conditional access policies directly or respond automatically to identity risk.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection policies for sign-ins and user accounts.
Integrate Conditional Access policies to enforce automated responses based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards and alerts to prioritize high-risk accounts for investigation.
Implement MFA and educate users on secure authentication practices.
Continuously refine risk detection and policy thresholds to adapt to emerging threats.
Azure AD Identity Protection provides comprehensive identity risk management, reducing the probability of account compromise and unauthorized access while supporting organizational compliance goals. Overview of Identity Risks
In modern enterprises, identity-related threats have become one of the primary vectors for cyberattacks. Threat actors often target user accounts rather than systems, exploiting weak passwords, credential leaks, or phishing attacks. These compromised identities can lead to unauthorized access, lateral movement within networks, and eventually data exfiltration or financial fraud. As organizations increasingly adopt cloud-based services and hybrid environments, the attack surface associated with identities grows significantly, making identity protection a critical component of a comprehensive security strategy.
Role of Azure AD Identity Protection
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed specifically to detect, investigate, and respond to identity-related risks. By leveraging machine learning algorithms, behavioral analytics, and threat intelligence collected across millions of users globally, it can identify abnormal login patterns, such as impossible travel, atypical locations, or sign-ins from unfamiliar devices. Each detected risk is assigned a risk level—low, medium, or high—which informs automated or manual remediation actions. This risk-based approach ensures that security measures are proportional to the threat while minimizing disruption to legitimate users.
Risk Detection Capabilities
Azure AD Identity Protection continuously monitors sign-ins and user activities for suspicious behaviors. Some of the key risk detections include compromised credentials, atypical travel or location patterns, anonymous IP usage, and sign-ins from malware-infected devices. The solution aggregates these risk signals to provide a comprehensive risk assessment for each user and each sign-in attempt. This assessment is invaluable for security operations teams, as it allows prioritization of investigative and remedial actions based on severity.
Integration with Conditional Access
One of the most powerful features of Azure AD Identity Protection is its seamless integration with Conditional Access policies. Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive access controls based on real-time risk evaluation. For example, a user flagged with medium-risk behavior might be required to complete multi-factor authentication (MFA) before gaining access, while high-risk accounts may be temporarily blocked or forced to reset passwords. This dynamic enforcement significantly reduces the likelihood of account compromise and ensures that protective actions are applied intelligently rather than uniformly.
Monitoring and Reporting
Azure AD Identity Protection provides security administrators with rich dashboards and reporting tools to monitor the overall health of user identities. These dashboards display trends in risky sign-ins, the number of users flagged with varying risk levels, and remediation actions taken. Security teams can use these insights to identify patterns, detect emerging threats, and optimize security policies. In addition, the platform supports automated alerting and incident workflows, ensuring that high-risk events receive immediate attention.
User Education and Policy Enforcement
While technology is crucial, user awareness and training remain critical components of identity protection. Azure AD Identity Protection supports organizations in educating users about secure authentication practices. For instance, when a user is prompted to perform MFA due to elevated risk, they also learn the importance of using strong, unique passwords and recognizing phishing attempts. Combining automated policy enforcement with user education creates a layered defense approach that significantly mitigates identity-related risks.
Continuous Improvement and Adaptability
Threat landscapes are constantly evolving, and identity protection must adapt accordingly. Azure AD Identity Protection allows organizations to fine-tune risk detection policies and Conditional Access thresholds. Security teams can experiment with different risk scoring models, adjust automated responses, and monitor the effectiveness of these changes. By continuously refining detection and response mechanisms, organizations maintain resilience against new and sophisticated attack techniques.
Business and Compliance Benefits
Beyond immediate security improvements, Azure AD Identity Protection supports regulatory compliance and governance goals. Many industry regulations, such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, require organizations to demonstrate control over user access and account security. Implementing Azure AD Identity Protection not only reduces the risk of breaches but also provides auditable logs and risk reports that can satisfy compliance requirements. This dual benefit of security and compliance enhances organizational trust and reduces operational risk.
Strategic Value in Enterprise Security
In conclusion, Azure AD Identity Protection serves as a cornerstone of modern identity security. By combining risk detection, automated remediation, Conditional Access enforcement, and user education, it provides a comprehensive solution to the growing problem of identity compromise. Enterprises leveraging this platform can prevent unauthorized access, mitigate potential breaches proactively, and ensure that security policies are both effective and minimally disruptive. Its integration with the broader Microsoft security ecosystem further enhances visibility and response capabilities, making it an essential tool for any organization seeking to secure its users, data, and infrastructure against identity-based threats.
Question 62 :
Your organization wants to detect abnormal cloud application usage patterns, enforce real-time session controls, and prevent exfiltration of sensitive data. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that provides visibility and control over cloud applications. In a cloud-first environment, detecting anomalous user behavior and preventing unauthorized data access are critical to maintaining security and regulatory compliance. MCAS achieves this by monitoring activity, applying policies, and detecting threats in real time.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint focuses on device protection and endpoint threat detection. While it provides valuable security telemetry, it cannot enforce cloud application policies or monitor session-level activity.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS allows organizations to discover all cloud applications in use, categorize them as sanctioned or unsanctioned, and apply session-level controls. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables classification and protection of sensitive data. Behavioral analytics detect anomalies such as mass downloads, unusual access locations, and excessive sharing. Alerts, reporting, and dashboards provide actionable insights for security teams to investigate incidents promptly. Policies can block downloads, restrict sharing, or terminate risky sessions to prevent data exfiltration.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates sign-in and account risk but does not provide real-time cloud application monitoring or session controls.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates security logs from endpoints, cloud applications, and identities. While it is effective for incident investigation and detection, it does not enforce real-time cloud session controls or prevent data exfiltration directly.
Implementation steps:
Discover cloud apps and categorize them by risk.
Apply session-level controls to monitor and restrict risky user behavior.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection to automatically classify and protect sensitive data.
Monitor alerts and dashboards to detect anomalous activity.
Investigate incidents and refine policies to maintain continuous protection and compliance.
MCAS ensures cloud application security through visibility, behavioral analytics, and enforcement of real-time policies, safeguarding sensitive data against insider threats and accidental exposure. Understanding Cloud Application Risks
In modern enterprises, cloud applications have become central to daily operations, enabling collaboration, storage, and business process automation. However, this cloud-first approach introduces new security challenges. Organizations often struggle with shadow IT—applications used without formal approval—which can create blind spots in security monitoring. Users may inadvertently expose sensitive data through misconfigured sharing settings or unsafe behaviors, such as downloading large volumes of data from unmanaged devices or accessing cloud apps from insecure networks. Detecting, understanding, and mitigating these risks is vital to preventing data breaches, regulatory violations, and reputational damage.
Role of Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS)
Microsoft Cloud App Security acts as a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), providing organizations with visibility, control, and protection across their cloud applications. Unlike traditional security tools focused on endpoints or network traffic, MCAS operates at the cloud level, monitoring user activity, session behavior, and application usage patterns in real time. By aggregating telemetry from connected cloud services—including Microsoft 365, third-party SaaS applications, and custom apps—MCAS offers a comprehensive view of cloud activity, allowing security teams to detect anomalies and enforce policies effectively.
Discovery and Risk Assessment of Cloud Applications
A foundational capability of MCAS is cloud app discovery. Organizations can identify all cloud services in use across the network, including those not formally sanctioned. Each application can be assessed for risk based on compliance certifications, industry standards, data handling practices, and exposure to known threats. Categorizing applications as sanctioned, unsanctioned, or high-risk enables security teams to implement appropriate access and monitoring policies. This proactive approach ensures that unmanaged or risky apps are either brought under governance or restricted from accessing sensitive data.
Behavioral Analytics and Threat Detection
MCAS employs advanced behavioral analytics to identify abnormal user activity indicative of insider threats or compromised accounts. Examples of suspicious behaviors include bulk downloads, access from unusual geolocations, repeated failed login attempts, and abnormal data sharing patterns. By using machine learning and adaptive algorithms, MCAS can distinguish between legitimate user behavior and potential security incidents. Alerts generated by these anomalies allow security teams to respond quickly, mitigating risks before they escalate into full-scale breaches.
Session-Level Controls and Real-Time Enforcement
A unique aspect of MCAS is its ability to enforce session-level controls in real time. Security policies can be configured to limit risky actions, such as preventing downloads from unmanaged devices, blocking access from unsecured networks, or terminating sessions that exhibit high-risk behavior. This capability allows organizations to protect sensitive data dynamically, rather than relying solely on retrospective detection or reactive remediation. It ensures that access and usage remain compliant with organizational policies while reducing the likelihood of accidental or malicious data exposure.
Integration with Microsoft Information Protection
MCAS integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Information Protection (MIP), enabling automatic classification and protection of sensitive data based on content and context. For instance, files containing personal identifiable information (PII) or financial data can be automatically encrypted, restricted from sharing, or monitored for unauthorized access. This integration strengthens compliance with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, providing both technical and procedural safeguards to prevent inadvertent disclosure or leakage of critical information.
Monitoring, Alerts, and Investigations
MCAS provides rich dashboards and reporting tools that give security teams actionable insights into cloud activity. Alerts can be customized to reflect organizational risk tolerances, prioritizing incidents based on severity, potential impact, and affected data types. Security analysts can drill down into user sessions, application usage, and file access patterns to conduct thorough investigations. This visibility ensures that organizations can detect, investigate, and remediate incidents promptly, maintaining a proactive security posture rather than reacting to breaches after the fact.
Continuous Policy Refinement and Adaptability
The cloud environment is dynamic, and organizational needs evolve. MCAS supports continuous improvement of security policies by allowing teams to refine controls based on emerging threats, new applications, or changes in user behavior. Policies can be updated to respond to new risk indicators, ensuring that the organization’s cloud security measures remain effective and aligned with business objectives. This adaptability is crucial for enterprises adopting hybrid and multi-cloud strategies, where static policies may quickly become outdated.
Business and Compliance Benefits
Implementing MCAS provides both security and business benefits. By reducing the likelihood of insider threats and accidental data leakage, organizations protect sensitive information, maintain customer trust, and avoid costly compliance violations. Moreover, the visibility and insights gained from MCAS enable informed decision-making regarding cloud adoption, usage policies, and risk management strategies. Regulatory auditors and stakeholders can be assured that cloud environments are continuously monitored, risks are mitigated, and policies are enforced consistently.
Strategic Value in Modern Enterprises
In conclusion, Microsoft Cloud App Security serves as a critical component of a cloud security strategy. Its capabilities in cloud app discovery, behavioral analytics, session-level enforcement, and integration with Microsoft Information Protection make it highly effective in mitigating risks associated with cloud adoption. By providing real-time monitoring, alerting, and policy enforcement, MCAS ensures that sensitive data remains protected, insider threats are minimized, and compliance objectives are met. For organizations navigating complex, cloud-centric infrastructures, MCAS delivers both visibility and control, making it indispensable for safeguarding enterprise data in a rapidly evolving threat landscape.
Question 63 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from malware, ransomware, and other attacks while enabling automated investigation and remediation. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provides enterprise-grade endpoint protection that includes advanced threat detection, automated investigation, and remediation. The increasing sophistication of ransomware, malware, and fileless attacks requires a solution that can respond automatically to threats, reducing the reliance on manual intervention and minimizing operational disruption.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS is primarily designed to monitor cloud applications and enforce data protection policies. It does not provide endpoint-specific malware detection or automated remediation.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel functions as a SIEM/SOAR platform for aggregating and analyzing security logs. While it can automate responses through playbooks, it does not natively remediate malware or ransomware on endpoints; it relies on telemetry from solutions such as MDE.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects detailed telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, registry changes, and network connections. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine analyzes alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, quarantines files, and restores configurations. Advanced hunting queries allow proactive detection of suspicious behaviors and emerging threats. Integration with Sentinel enables centralized visibility and orchestration across the enterprise.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on authentication risk and risky sign-ins, not endpoint malware or ransomware protection.
Implementation steps:
Onboard endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Configure the AIR engine to automatically investigate and remediate threats.
Conduct advanced hunting to detect anomalies proactively.
Integrate MDE with Sentinel for enterprise-wide threat correlation and incident response.
Continuously evaluate and optimize policies and alert responses.
MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated threat remediation, and enhanced operational efficiency, minimizing the risk of ransomware and malware impact.
Question 64 :
Your organization wants to centralize security monitoring, perform proactive threat hunting, and automate responses to incidents across endpoints, identities, and cloud apps. Which Microsoft solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR solution that provides centralized visibility, advanced analytics, proactive threat hunting, and automated incident response. Modern enterprises require unified monitoring and response capabilities to detect sophisticated threats across multiple domains.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS provides monitoring and policy enforcement for cloud applications, but does not provide centralized SIEM or SOAR functionality for enterprise-wide threat correlation and automated response.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates telemetry from endpoints, identities, and cloud applications. Analytics rules detect anomalies, suspicious behavior, and advanced threats. Threat hunting is supported through Kusto Query Language (KQL), and automated response is enabled through playbooks built on Azure Logic Apps. Sentinel dashboards provide real-time visibility into incidents, compliance, and trends, supporting proactive security operations.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses solely on identity risks and cannot provide centralized monitoring or automated response across multiple security domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints and provides telemetry, but cannot independently perform enterprise-wide correlation or automated incident response across all domains.
Implementation steps:
Connect endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules and correlation to detect anomalous events.
Build dashboards for real-time visibility and reporting.
Develop automated playbooks for common incidents.
Conduct regular threat hunting exercises to detect hidden or emerging threats.
Sentinel offers a comprehensive, enterprise-wide solution combining SIEM and SOAR capabilities, enabling organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats proactively.
Question 65 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting the execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables. Which solution and feature should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint proactively block risky behaviors on endpoints that could lead to malware or ransomware infection. Unlike traditional signature-based antivirus solutions, ASR rules are behavior-based, preventing execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables to stop attacks before they occur.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus solutions are primarily signature-based and reactive. They are limited in their ability to prevent zero-day attacks or behavior-based threats.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules block high-risk behaviors, including executing macros from email attachments, running scripts from temporary folders, or opening untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerts, and automated remediation, reducing the attack surface and preventing ransomware propagation.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Focuses on identity and sign-in risks, not endpoint protection against malware or ransomware.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: Monitors cloud applications and enforces data protection policies, but cannot prevent malware or ransomware execution on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to reduce false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across endpoints while monitoring user impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows to isolate or remediate detected threats.
Monitor alerts and telemetry to optimize ASR policies.
Educate users on safe practices to complement technical protections.
ASR rules combined with MDE provide proactive, behavior-based endpoint protection, minimizing ransomware and malware risk while maintaining operational efficiency.
Question 66 :
Your organization wants to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive files in cloud applications, monitor user activity in real time, and enforce policy-based restrictions on risky behaviors. Which Microsoft solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that provides visibility, real-time monitoring, and control for cloud applications. Organizations face challenges in protecting sensitive data, especially in a cloud-first environment where users access multiple SaaS applications. MCAS addresses these challenges through policy enforcement, behavioral analytics, and anomaly detection.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint protects devices from malware, ransomware, and suspicious activity. It does not monitor cloud application sessions or enforce data protection policies.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS identifies all cloud applications in use, assesses their risk, and classifies them as sanctioned or unsanctioned. It enforces real-time policies to prevent sensitive data leakage through risky user actions, such as downloading files, mass sharing, or accessing applications from unusual locations. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables automatic labeling and protection of sensitive files. Alerts and dashboards provide actionable insights for security teams, helping them investigate incidents efficiently while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates risky sign-ins and accounts but does not monitor user activity within cloud applications or enforce real-time session restrictions.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs from multiple sources and can detect suspicious activity when integrated with MCAS. However, it cannot enforce session-level controls or prevent data exfiltration in real time independently.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications and categorize them based on risk.
Apply session policies to control risky actions such as downloads, sharing, and uploads.
Integrate Microsoft Information Protection to classify and protect sensitive files automatically.
Monitor dashboards and alerts to detect and respond to anomalies.
Establish incident response workflows for prompt remediation and compliance reporting.
MCAS ensures cloud application security by combining visibility, anomaly detection, and policy enforcement, preventing unauthorized data access and maintaining organizational compliance.
Question 67 :
Your organization needs to detect and respond to endpoint threats such as malware, ransomware, and suspicious activities with minimal manual intervention. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) is an enterprise endpoint security platform providing threat detection, automated investigation, and remediation. With the increasing sophistication of malware, ransomware, and fileless attacks, organizations need solutions that minimize human intervention while providing robust protection.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS focuses on monitoring cloud applications and enforcing data policies. It does not protect endpoints directly against malware or ransomware.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel is a SIEM/SOAR solution that aggregates logs and automates responses via playbooks but does not natively remediate malware on endpoints without integration with MDE.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects detailed telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, registry changes, and network activity. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine investigates alerts, isolates comp terminatess malicious processes, quarantines files, and restores system configurations. Advanced hunting enables proactive detection of anomalies. Integration with Sentinel allows centralized incident management and enterprise-wide orchestration.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on risky sign-ins and identity compromise, not endpoint threats.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Configure the AIR engine to automatically investigate and remediate threats.
Conduct advanced hunting to identify potential security issues proactively.
Integrate with Sentinel for enterprise-wide correlation and response.
Regularly review remediation outcomes to optimize policies and reduce false positives.
MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated threat remediation, and minimal operational disruption, maintaining organizational security posture efficiently.
Question 68 :
Your organization wants to detect compromised accounts, risky sign-ins, and enforce risk-based conditional access policies automatically. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: C) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is focused on mitigating identity risks such as compromised credentials and risky sign-ins. Identity compromise is a primary attack vector in cloud environments, allowing attackers unauthorized access to sensitive information. Identity Protection evaluates sign-in and user behavior risk, assigns risk levels, and automatically enforces conditional access policies.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints but does not evaluate sign-in risk or enforce identity-based access policies.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel can monitor and detect identity-related anomalies, but requires integration with Conditional Access for automated enforcement.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection integrates with Conditional Access to apply automated responses. Medium-risk users may be prompted for MFA, while high-risk users may be blocked or required to reset passwords. Dashboards allow security teams to monitor trends, investigate anomalies, and prioritize high-risk accounts.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications but does not enforce authentication or risk-based conditional access policies.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for sign-ins and accounts.
Integrate with Conditional Access for automated enforcement based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards to investigate high-risk accounts.
Deploy MFA and educate users on secure authentication practices.
Refine policies to adapt to emerging threats and organizational requirements.
Identity Protection reduces identity-based risks, prevents unauthorized access, and strengthens compliance through automated policy enforcement.
Question 69 :
Your organization wants centralized security monitoring, proactive threat hunting, and automated incident response across endpoints, identities, and cloud applications. Which solution is most suitable?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform that provides enterprise-wide visibility, advanced analytics, threat hunting, and automated incident response. Centralized monitoring is critical in complex environments to detect and respond to sophisticated threats effectively.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity but does not provide SIEM or SOAR capabilities across multiple domains.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs from endpoints, identities, and cloud applications, applying analytics to detect anomalies and advanced threats. Threat hunting is facilitated via Kusto Query Language (KQL), and automated response is achieved through playbooks built on Azure Logic Apps. Dashboards offer real-time visibility into incidents, compliance, and trends, supporting proactive threat detection and response.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses solely on identity-related risk and cannot provide centralized monitoring or automated incident response across endpoints and cloud applications.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE secures endpoints and provides telemetry, but does not provide enterprise-wide SIEM or SOAR capabilities independently.
Implementation steps:
Connect all endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules for anomaly detection and event correlation.
Build dashboards for real-time monitoring and reporting.
Develop automated playbooks for common incidents.
Conduct threat hunting exercises to identify emerging threats proactively.
Sentinel provides a unified solution combining SIEM and SOAR capabilities, enabling organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats across multiple domains effectively.
Question 70 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting untrusted scripts, macros, and executable files. Which solution and feature should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint proactively block high-risk behaviors on endpoints, preventing malware and ransomware before they execute. ASR rules provide behavior-based protection, complementing traditional signature-based antivirus solutions.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is reactive, signature-based, and does not prevent zero-day or behavior-based threats effectively.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules block high-risk behaviors such as running macros from email attachments, executing scripts from temporary folders, or opening untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. These rules reduce the attack surface, prevent ransomware propagation, and allow security teams to respond promptly.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Focuses on identity and authentication risks, not endpoint protection against ransomware or malware execution.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: Monitors cloud apps and enforces data policies, but cannot restrict malware execution on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across endpoints while monitoring user impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows for detected threats.
Monitor alerts and telemetry to optimize ASR policies.
Educate users on safe practices to complement technical protections.
MDE with ASR rules provides proactive, behavior-based endpoint protection, reducing the risk of ransomware and malware while maintaining operational efficiency.
Question 71 :
Your organization wants to detect suspicious logins, identify compromised accounts, and enforce multi-factor authentication for high-risk users automatically. Which Microsoft solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to detect identity risks and compromised credentials. Identity-based attacks are among the most common vectors for data breaches, allowing attackers to access sensitive information, elevate privileges, or move laterally across an organization. Identity Protection leverages machine learning, behavior analytics, and global threat intelligence to identify suspicious sign-ins, compromised accounts, and high-risk users.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint protects endpoints from malware and ransomware. While it provides critical device-level protection, it does not monitor identity risks, sign-ins, or enforce authentication policies.
Option B – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection assigns risk scores to users and sign-ins and integrates with Conditional Access policies for automated enforcement. Medium-risk users may be prompted for multi-factor authentication (MFA), while high-risk users can be blocked or required to reset their passwords. Security teams can monitor dashboards to investigate trends, detect high-risk accounts, and take corrective action. Identity Protection ensures a proactive response to compromised accounts while maintaining regulatory compliance and reducing potential breaches.
Option C – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity and detects anomalies. However, it does not enforce risk-based access or identity policies at the authentication level.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs and detects anomalies, but does not automatically enforce identity-based policies without integration with Conditional Access and Identity Protection.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for sign-ins and accounts.
Integrate Identity Protection with Conditional Access to enforce automated responses based on risk scores.
Monitor dashboards for high-risk activity and investigate anomalies.
Deploy MFA and educate users on secure authentication practices.
Continuously refine risk thresholds and policies based on emerging threats.
Azure AD Identity Protection strengthens identity security by automatically detecting compromised accounts, enforcing MFA for high-risk users, and enabling proactive response to suspicious sign-ins.
Question 72 :
Your organization wants to monitor all cloud applications, detect anomalous user behavior, and prevent accidental or malicious data leaks. Which solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) designed to provide visibility and control over cloud applications. In modern cloud environments, accidental or malicious data leaks are significant risks, especially with increasing adoption of SaaS applications. MCAS helps organizations detect anomalies, monitor user activity, and enforce real-time policies to prevent unauthorized data access.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints from malware and ransomware but does not monitor cloud application usage or enforce session-level policies.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS discovers all cloud applications in use, evaluates their risk, and classifies them as sanctioned or unsanctioned. It applies session-level policies to control downloads, uploads, sharing, and other risky actions. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection ensures sensitive data is automatically classified and protected. Behavioral analytics detect anomalies, such as mass downloads or unusual access locations, which may indicate insider threats or compromised accounts. Alerts and dashboards provide actionable insights, enabling rapid investigation and response.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates sign-in and account risk but does not enforce real-time session control or monitor cloud application activity.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs and detects suspicious activity, but cannot enforce session-level controls or prevent data leaks in real time without MCAS integration.
Implementation steps:
Discover cloud applications in use and classify them based on risk.
Apply session policies to control risky user behavior.
Integrate Microsoft Information Protection to classify and protect sensitive data automatically.
Monitor alerts and dashboards to detect anomalies.
Investigate incidents promptly and refine policies to maintain continuous protection and compliance.
MCAS ensures cloud application security through visibility, anomaly detection, and policy enforcement, preventing accidental or malicious data leaks while supporting regulatory compliance.
Question 73 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints against malware and ransomware while enabling automated investigation and remediation. Which solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provides enterprise-grade endpoint protection, including advanced threat detection, automated investigation, and remediation. In the face of sophisticated malware, ransomware, and fileless attacks, organizations require automated solutions that reduce response time and minimize operational disruption.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS is focused on monitoring cloud application activity and enforcing data protection policies. It does not provide direct endpoint malware protection.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel is a SIEM/SOAR platform that aggregates logs and triggers automated responses through playbooks. However, it does not natively remediate malware or ransomware on endpoints without integration with MDE.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects detailed telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, registry changes, and network activity. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine investigates alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, quarantines files, and restores system configurations. Advanced hunting queries allow proactive detection of suspicious behaviors. Integration with Sentinel enables centralized enterprise visibility and orchestration.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection monitors authentication risks and risky sign-ins but does not provide endpoint-level malware protection.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Configure the AIR engine to automatically investigate and remediate threats.
Conduct advanced hunting to proactively detect suspicious activities.
Integrate with Sentinel for enterprise-wide monitoring and orchestration.
Review remediation outcomes regularly to optimize policies and reduce false positives.
MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated remediation, and rapid detection of malware and ransomware, minimizing operational impact.
Question 74 :
Your organization wants centralized security monitoring, proactive threat hunting, and automated incident response across endpoints, identities, and cloud applications. Which solution is most suitable?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform that provides centralized visibility, analytics, threat hunting, and automated incident response. Modern organizations require a unified approach to detect, investigate, and respond to complex threats across multiple domains.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS provides visibility and control for cloud applications, but does not offer enterprise-wide SIEM or SOAR capabilities.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs from endpoints, identities, and cloud applications, applies analytics rules to detect anomalies, and supports advanced threat hunting using Kusto Query Language (KQL). Automated playbooks enable rapid response to incidents, such as isolating devices, disabling compromised accounts, or notifying security teams. Dashboards provide real-time visibility into incidents, compliance, and trends.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses solely on identity risks and cannot provide centralized monitoring or automated incident response across multiple domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE secures endpoints and provides telemetry but does not independently deliver enterprise-wide SIEM or SOAR capabilities.
Implementation steps:
Connect endpoints, cloud applications, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules and event correlation for anomaly detection.
Build dashboards for real-time visibility and reporting.
Develop automated playbooks to respond to common incident types.
Conduct threat hunting exercises to identify emerging threats proactively.
Sentinel provides a unified platform for detecting, investigating, and responding to threats across endpoints, identities, and cloud applications, supporting enterprise-wide security operations.
Question 75 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting untrusted scripts, macros, and executable files. Which solution and feature should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint proactively block high-risk behaviors on endpoints to prevent malware and ransomware execution. ASR provides behavior-based protection, complementing traditional antivirus solutions by stopping attacks before they can compromise systems.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is signature-based and reactive. While effective against known threats, it cannot prevent zero-day attacks or behavior-based threats effectively.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules prevent high-risk behaviors, including executing macros from email attachments, running scripts from temporary directories, and opening untrusted executables. Integration with MDE ensures telemetry collection, alerting, and automated remediation. ASR reduces the attack surface and prevents ransomware propagation while allowing rapid response to threats.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Focuses on identity and authentication risks but does not prevent malware or ransomware on endpoints.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: Monitors cloud applications and enforces data policies but cannot restrict malware or ransomware execution on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across endpoints while monitoring for user impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows to respond to detected threats.
Continuously monitor, alerts and telemetry to optimize ASR policies.
Educate users on safe practices to complement technical protections.
MDE with ASR rules provides proactive, behavior-based endpoint protection, reducing ransomware and malware risk while maintaining operational efficiency.