Microsoft AZ-305 Designing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solution Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Microsoft AZ-305 Designing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solution Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q91-105

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-305 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 91

You need to design a solution to secure access to Azure Storage accounts from specific virtual networks and IP addresses. Which Azure feature should you use?

A) Private Endpoints
B) Azure Firewall
C) Network Security Groups
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Private Endpoints

Explanation:

Private Endpoints allow secure access to Azure Storage accounts over a private IP within a virtual network. This removes exposure to the public internet, ensuring that traffic stays on the Azure backbone network. Private Endpoints also integrate with Azure Private DNS to manage resolution of storage account names internally, enhancing security and network isolation. They support Blob, File, Queue, and Table storage, enabling secure communication between resources without requiring public IP addresses.

Azure Firewall provides centralized filtering and threat intelligence for network traffic. While it can restrict access to specific IPs, it does not provide private connectivity over the Azure backbone or integrate with storage account endpoints.

Network Security Groups (NSGs) filter traffic at the subnet or NIC level. They control inbound and outbound traffic but cannot provide private connectivity directly to a storage account. They are primarily a network-level security mechanism.

Azure Key Vault stores and manages encryption keys, secrets, and certificates. While it enhances security for data encryption, it does not control network access or provide private connectivity to storage accounts.

The correct selection must allow storage access from specific virtual networks while avoiding public exposure. Private Endpoints meet these requirements by assigning private IPs, integrating with DNS, and maintaining traffic within Azure’s private network. Other services focus on filtering, firewalling, or key management without enabling private endpoint connectivity. Therefore, Private Endpoints are the correct choice.

Question 92

You need to design a solution to distribute traffic between multiple Azure regions with performance-based routing. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Azure Load Balancer
C) Azure Application Gateway
D) Azure Front Door

Answer: A) Azure Traffic Manager

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based traffic routing service. It directs user requests to the most appropriate endpoint based on routing methods such as performance, priority, or geographic location. Performance routing directs traffic to the region with the lowest network latency for the client, improving user experience. Traffic Manager also provides failover capabilities by rerouting traffic from unhealthy endpoints.

Azure Load Balancer is a regional Layer 4 service that distributes traffic across VMs in a specific region. It does not provide global routing or performance-based decisions.

Azure Application Gateway is a regional Layer 7 load balancer. While it supports URL-based routing, SSL termination, and WAF, it does not handle global DNS-based routing or performance routing between regions.

Azure Front Door is a global Layer 7 service providing low-latency routing and SSL offload. While it does route traffic globally, its primary function is application acceleration and caching rather than DNS-based performance routing.

The correct selection must route traffic globally and optimize performance based on latency. Traffic Manager fulfills this by using DNS-based routing policies to direct users to the best-performing regional endpoint. Other services focus on regional load balancing, Layer 7 features, or caching without DNS-based performance routing. Therefore, Azure Traffic Manager is the correct choice.

Question 93

You need to design a solution to enforce resource consistency and compliance across multiple Azure subscriptions. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Policy
B) Azure Blueprints
C) Azure RBAC
D) Azure Monitor

Answer: A) Azure Policy

Explanation:

Azure Policy enables organizations to enforce rules and compliance requirements across Azure resources. It evaluates resources against defined policies and can deny, audit, or append properties to non-compliant resources. Policies ensure consistency in configuration, such as enforcing specific tags, allowed virtual machine sizes, or restricting public IP usage. Azure Policy can be applied at subscription or management group levels, ensuring governance across multiple subscriptions.

Azure Blueprints allow packaging of policies, role assignments, and ARM templates into repeatable environment deployments. While Blueprints help deploy compliant environments, the active enforcement of policies is handled by Azure Policy.

Azure RBAC provides role-based access control, managing permissions for users and groups. While it controls access, it does not enforce compliance or configuration standards on resources.

Azure Monitor provides monitoring and alerting for resource metrics and logs. It does not enforce compliance or configuration standards.

The correct selection must actively enforce resource compliance and standard configurations across subscriptions. Azure Policy achieves this by evaluating resources, auditing violations, and optionally enforcing rules automatically. Other services focus on deployment, access control, or monitoring and cannot enforce resource compliance. Therefore, Azure Policy is the correct choice.

Question 94

You need to design a solution for encrypting SQL Database columns containing sensitive data such as credit card numbers. Which feature should you use?

A) Always Encrypted
B) Transparent Data Encryption (TDE)
C) Azure Key Vault
D) Azure Storage Service Encryption

Answer: A) Always Encrypted

Explanation:

Always Encrypted is a feature that encrypts sensitive columns in SQL Database. Encryption occurs on the client-side, ensuring that sensitive data remains encrypted in transit and at rest. Only authorized applications with access to encryption keys can decrypt the data. This protects sensitive information such as credit card numbers, social security numbers, or personal identifiers from unauthorized access by administrators or external attackers.

Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) encrypts the entire database at rest, protecting stored data from disk theft or unauthorized access. However, TDE does not encrypt data during query processing, and sensitive columns can still be accessed in plaintext by authorized users.

Azure Key Vault stores and manages encryption keys but does not encrypt database columns directly. It can be used in conjunction with Always Encrypted or TDE for key management.

Azure Storage Service Encryption encrypts blobs, files, queues, and tables at rest. It does not provide column-level encryption in SQL Databases.

The correct selection must encrypt specific columns containing sensitive data while maintaining usability in authorized applications. Always Encrypted meets this requirement with client-side encryption, key management integration, and column-level protection. Other services provide database-level encryption, key management, or storage encryption but do not protect individual columns against unauthorized access. Therefore, Always Encrypted is the correct choice.

Question 95

You need to design a solution for centralizing logging and monitoring across multiple Azure subscriptions. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Azure Security Center
C) Azure Sentinel
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor collects and analyzes telemetry from Azure resources, including virtual machines, networks, and databases. It centralizes logs, metrics, and diagnostic data, providing dashboards and query capabilities through Log Analytics. Alerts can be configured based on thresholds, anomalies, or custom queries, and Action Groups can notify users or trigger automated responses. Azure Monitor supports cross-subscription monitoring by consolidating logs and metrics for governance and operational visibility.

Azure Security Center focuses on security posture, threat detection, and compliance. While it provides security alerts, it does not centralize operational metrics for performance monitoring.

Azure Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM for security incident detection, investigation, and response. It focuses on security events and threats rather than general performance or operational monitoring.

Azure Key Vault manages encryption keys, secrets, and certificates but does not collect logs or metrics from resources.

The correct selection must provide centralized monitoring, log collection, analytics, and alerting across multiple subscriptions. Azure Monitor meets these requirements with cross-subscription aggregation, alerting, dashboards, and integration with Action Groups. Other services focus on security or key management and cannot provide full operational monitoring. Therefore, Azure Monitor is the correct choice.

Question 96

You need to design a solution to encrypt data at rest in Azure Storage using customer-managed keys. Which service should you use?

A) Azure Key Vault
B) Transparent Data Encryption (TDE)
C) Always Encrypted
D) Azure Security Center

Answer: A) Azure Key Vault

Explanation:

Azure Key Vault is a cloud service designed to securely store and manage cryptographic keys, secrets, and certificates, providing organizations with a centralized and secure solution for key management. One of its primary uses is enabling customer-managed keys (CMKs) for Azure Storage accounts, allowing organizations to retain control over the encryption of data at rest. By leveraging Key Vault, customers can ensure that their encryption keys are protected, can enforce strict access controls, and maintain compliance with regulatory and organizational security requirements. Key Vault provides a secure environment for key generation, storage, and lifecycle management, including rotation and auditing, which are essential for maintaining strong data protection practices over time.

When an Azure Storage account is configured to use customer-managed keys stored in Key Vault, all encryption operations are integrated with Key Vault, allowing the customer to maintain full control over the keys that encrypt and decrypt their data. This means that even though the data resides in Azure’s storage infrastructure, the keys that protect that data remain under the customer’s control. Users can define and enforce access policies to determine who or which services can use the keys, enabling granular security management. Additionally, Key Vault maintains detailed audit logs that track all key operations, such as key access, usage, and rotation events. These logs are invaluable for compliance, forensic analysis, and internal governance, ensuring that organizations can demonstrate adherence to security policies and regulatory standards.

It is important to differentiate Azure Key Vault from other Azure security and encryption options, which serve different purposes and do not provide customer-controlled key management for storage accounts. Transparent Data Encryption (TDE), for example, is designed to encrypt SQL Databases at rest. While TDE ensures that database files are encrypted, it does not extend to Azure Storage accounts and does not allow customers to manage the encryption keys independently. Similarly, Always Encrypted provides column-level encryption for sensitive data within SQL Databases, allowing applications to perform operations on encrypted data without exposing the plaintext to the database engine. However, this feature is specific to databases and does not apply to storage accounts or offer centralized key management for general storage encryption. Azure Security Center, while a valuable tool for monitoring the overall security posture of Azure resources, providing threat detection and compliance assessment, does not facilitate encryption key management or control over encryption operations. Its focus is on security monitoring rather than key lifecycle management.

Therefore, for organizations that require the ability to manage encryption keys for data at rest in Azure Storage accounts, Azure Key Vault is the optimal solution. It provides secure key storage, controlled access, automated key rotation, and detailed auditing, all of which ensure that customers retain full control over the encryption of their data. By integrating seamlessly with Azure Storage, Key Vault enables organizations to meet regulatory compliance requirements while maintaining robust security practices. In comparison, other services such as TDE, Always Encrypted, or Azure Security Center address specific aspects of data security but do not provide the same level of key management and customer control for storage account encryption. This makes Azure Key Vault the definitive choice for managing customer-controlled keys for storage encryption.

Question 97

You need to design a solution for secure remote access to Azure virtual machines over the internet. Which Azure service should you recommend?

A) Azure Bastion
B) VPN Gateway
C) Network Security Groups (NSGs)
D) Azure Firewall

Answer: A) Azure Bastion

Explanation:

Azure Bastion provides secure, browser-based remote access to Azure virtual machines without exposing RDP or SSH ports to the public internet. It establishes SSL-encrypted connections through the Azure portal, eliminating the need for public IP addresses and reducing the attack surface. Bastion integrates seamlessly with VNets and provides high availability, simplifying remote access for administrators.

VPN Gateway provides encrypted site-to-site or point-to-site connections but requires VPN client configuration and is generally used for broader network connectivity rather than simple VM access.

Network Security Groups (NSGs) filter inbound and outbound traffic but do not provide remote access themselves. They protect exposed ports but cannot replace secure remote connectivity solutions.

Azure Firewall is a managed firewall that inspects traffic and provides filtering but does not provide remote access to VMs.

The correct selection must enable secure, direct access to VMs without public exposure. Azure Bastion meets this requirement by using browser-based SSL connections, high availability, and integration with VNets. Other services focus on network connectivity, filtering, or inspection without providing secure remote access. Therefore, Azure Bastion is the correct choice.

Question 98

You need to design a solution for global caching and acceleration of web application content. Which Azure service should you recommend?

A) Azure Front Door
B) Azure Load Balancer
C) Azure Traffic Manager
D) Azure Application Gateway

Answer: A) Azure Front Door

Explanation:

Azure Front Door is a global Layer 7 service that accelerates web application delivery through caching, SSL offload, WAF, and low-latency routing to the nearest healthy backend. It improves performance by reducing latency and offloading content closer to end users. Front Door automatically directs traffic to the fastest available endpoint, ensuring consistent application responsiveness across regions.

Azure Load Balancer distributes traffic at Layer 4 but does not provide caching, SSL offload, or global acceleration.

Azure Traffic Manager provides DNS-based routing for endpoint selection but cannot cache content or accelerate web traffic.

Azure Application Gateway provides regional Layer 7 load balancing, SSL offload, and WAF but does not offer global caching or acceleration for multi-region deployments.

The correct selection must cache content globally, reduce latency, and optimize performance for users across regions. Azure Front Door meets these requirements with integrated caching, Layer 7 routing, and global distribution. Other services focus on regional load balancing or routing and cannot accelerate web content globally. Therefore, Azure Front Door is the correct choice.

Question 99

You need to design a solution to provide real-time replication of Azure VMs across regions for disaster recovery. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Azure Backup
C) Azure Storage Account replication
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery is a robust disaster recovery solution designed to ensure business continuity by replicating Azure virtual machines (VMs) or on-premises machines to a secondary Azure region. Its primary function is to continuously synchronize data from the primary environment to a secondary location, enabling organizations to maintain operations even in the event of an unexpected outage. This continuous replication ensures that critical workloads remain up-to-date, minimizing potential data loss and downtime. In addition to data replication, Site Recovery offers comprehensive failover orchestration, allowing organizations to switch workloads to a secondary site seamlessly. This orchestration is particularly valuable for multi-tier applications, where dependencies between different components must be maintained to ensure application integrity during a disaster.

One of the key features of Azure Site Recovery is its ability to support multi-tier application replication. Many enterprise applications consist of multiple interconnected components, such as databases, application servers, and web front ends. Site Recovery can replicate these components in a coordinated manner, ensuring that the failover process respects the dependencies between them. This coordination helps prevent scenarios where a portion of the application is available while other critical components remain offline, which could disrupt business operations. Moreover, Site Recovery allows organizations to perform test failovers. This feature provides a safe, non-disruptive way to validate disaster recovery plans and verify that applications will function correctly in a secondary region without affecting the production environment.

Site Recovery also integrates with monitoring and management tools to assess the health of replicated workloads. Continuous monitoring allows IT teams to identify potential issues before they become critical and ensures that replication is functioning as expected. This proactive approach is essential for organizations that rely on high availability and need to meet strict recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs).

While other Azure services provide related functionality, they do not fully meet the requirements of real-time replication and failover orchestration. Azure Backup, for example, offers point-in-time backups of data and VMs, which is useful for restoring data after accidental deletion or corruption. However, it does not provide continuous replication or automated failover capabilities, making it unsuitable for scenarios where near-zero downtime is required. Similarly, Azure Storage Account replication ensures that storage data is duplicated across regions, but it does not replicate the operational state or configuration of virtual machines, nor does it handle failover orchestration. Azure Key Vault focuses on managing encryption keys, secrets, and certificates to enhance security. While it is critical for protecting sensitive information, it does not provide disaster recovery or replication of workloads.

When evaluating Azure services for disaster recovery and business continuity that require real-time VM replication and automated failover, Azure Site Recovery is the most suitable choice. Its ability to continuously synchronize workloads, orchestrate failovers, support multi-tier applications, and integrate with monitoring tools ensures that organizations can maintain operations with minimal disruption during outages. Other services, while valuable for backup, storage replication, or key management, do not offer the same comprehensive disaster recovery capabilities, making Azure Site Recovery the optimal solution for ensuring resilience and continuity in the cloud.

Question 100

You need to design a solution for monitoring application performance and detecting anomalies across multiple Azure services. Which Azure service should you use?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Azure Security Center
C) Azure Traffic Manager
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to provide deep visibility into the performance, health, and operational status of applications and infrastructure across an organization’s Azure environment. As cloud and hybrid architectures become increasingly complex, monitoring solutions must be able to capture telemetry from multiple sources, analyze it, and provide actionable insights to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Azure Monitor addresses these requirements by collecting, analyzing, and visualizing metrics, logs, and events from a wide range of Azure resources and applications, enabling organizations to maintain performance and quickly identify and resolve issues.

One of the core capabilities of Azure Monitor is its ability to collect telemetry data across both infrastructure and applications. This includes metrics that quantify resource usage, performance statistics, and system health, as well as logs that record operational events and diagnostic information. By aggregating this data in a centralized platform, Azure Monitor enables administrators and developers to gain a holistic view of their environment. This centralized approach simplifies monitoring across multiple subscriptions and resources, making it easier to detect anomalies, monitor trends, and ensure resources are functioning as expected.

Azure Monitor integrates with Application Insights, a specialized tool for application performance monitoring and diagnostics. Application Insights provides deep visibility into application behavior, enabling detection of performance bottlenecks, failed requests, exceptions, slow response times, and dependency failures. With these capabilities, organizations can proactively identify issues before they affect end users, improving overall application reliability and user experience. Application Insights also supports distributed tracing, allowing teams to track requests across multiple services and pinpoint the exact source of performance issues in complex, multi-tier applications.

Another important feature of Azure Monitor is its alerting and automation capabilities. By defining rules and thresholds, administrators can receive real-time notifications when metrics exceed expected ranges or when anomalies are detected. Integration with Action Groups allows automated responses to alerts, such as scaling resources, restarting services, or sending notifications via email, SMS, or other communication channels. This ensures that potential issues are addressed promptly, reducing downtime and minimizing operational impact.

Other Azure services do not provide the same comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Azure Security Center focuses primarily on security threats, compliance, and vulnerability management. While it can generate alerts related to security, it does not provide detailed performance monitoring or application diagnostics. Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global routing solution, designed to direct traffic to the most appropriate endpoint based on performance, geographic location, or priority, but it does not collect detailed telemetry or detect anomalies. Azure Key Vault manages encryption keys, secrets, and certificates, offering secure key management, but it does not provide monitoring or performance analysis capabilities.

The correct solution for monitoring application and resource performance, detecting anomalies, and gaining actionable insights is Azure Monitor. Its ability to centralize telemetry, integrate with Application Insights, perform anomaly detection, and trigger automated alerts makes it indispensable for maintaining the performance and reliability of applications and infrastructure. Other services, while useful for security, traffic management, or key management, do not provide the comprehensive monitoring and diagnostic capabilities required. Azure Monitor ensures that organizations have complete visibility into their environment and the tools necessary to respond proactively to performance issues, making it the ideal choice for centralized, performance-focused monitoring.

Question 101

You need to design a solution that provides high availability for Azure virtual machines across multiple availability zones. Which Azure feature should you recommend?

A) Availability Zones
B) Availability Sets
C) Azure Load Balancer
D) Azure Traffic Manager

Answer: A) Availability Zones

Explanation:

Availability Zones are a critical feature within Azure that provide high availability and fault tolerance by distributing resources across physically separate locations within the same Azure region. Each Availability Zone is designed as an independent data center with its own power, cooling, and networking infrastructure. This separation ensures that applications and virtual machines (VMs) deployed across multiple zones remain resilient even if one zone experiences an outage or a catastrophic failure. By leveraging multiple Availability Zones, organizations can design architectures that withstand datacenter-level disruptions while maintaining continuous access to applications and services.

One of the primary benefits of Availability Zones is enhanced fault tolerance. In traditional single-datacenter deployments, hardware failures, power outages, or network disruptions can result in downtime and impact service reliability. Availability Zones mitigate these risks by ensuring that workloads are distributed across multiple isolated zones within the same region. Each zone operates independently, so an outage affecting one zone does not affect the resources in other zones. This architecture allows mission-critical applications to achieve higher uptime and meet stringent service-level agreements (SLAs) for availability.

Deploying VMs across Availability Zones also provides resilience against maintenance events and unplanned incidents. Azure automatically places workloads in different zones to minimize the impact of hardware failures or software updates. This ensures that even during planned maintenance or unexpected disruptions, applications continue to function without significant downtime. For businesses that require high availability for applications such as e-commerce platforms, financial systems, or healthcare services, distributing resources across Availability Zones is essential for business continuity.

While Availability Zones provide high availability within a region, other Azure services offer complementary but distinct benefits. Availability Sets, for example, distribute VMs across fault domains and update domains within a single datacenter. This protects against hardware failures and maintenance events at the datacenter level but does not provide protection against full datacenter outages or regional failures. Availability Sets are useful for ensuring high availability within a single location but lack the broader fault tolerance that Availability Zones offer.

Azure Load Balancer distributes network traffic across multiple VMs within a region, providing network-level high availability and even workload distribution. While this helps maintain performance and responsiveness, it does not protect against regional failures or ensure that VMs remain available if an entire zone goes offline. Similarly, Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing solution that directs users to healthy endpoints across different regions. While it provides global redundancy and improves performance by routing traffic closer to users, it does not address high availability within a single region or across multiple zones.

The correct choice for achieving high availability across physically separate locations within an Azure region is Availability Zones. By distributing workloads across zones with independent power, cooling, and networking, organizations can design resilient architectures that withstand datacenter-level failures and ensure business continuity. Other services, such as Availability Sets, Load Balancer, or Traffic Manager, focus on regional fault tolerance, network load distribution, or global traffic management, but they cannot provide the zone-level isolation and resilience that Availability Zones deliver. Therefore, Availability Zones are the ideal solution for ensuring high availability and fault tolerance for mission-critical applications within a region.

Question 102

You need to design a solution for scaling Azure virtual machines automatically based on demand. Which Azure feature should you recommend?

A) Virtual Machine Scale Sets
B) Azure Load Balancer
C) Azure Traffic Manager
D) Azure Application Gateway

Answer: A) Virtual Machine Scale Sets

Explanation:

Virtual Machine Scale Sets (VMSS) are a foundational service in Azure designed to provide automatic scaling, high availability, and simplified management for large numbers of virtual machines. VMSS allows organizations to deploy and manage a group of identical VMs that can automatically increase or decrease in number in response to demand. This capability is crucial for applications that experience variable workloads, such as web applications with fluctuating user traffic, batch processing systems, or data analytics workloads. By automatically scaling out during periods of high demand and scaling in during periods of low utilization, VMSS ensures both optimal performance and cost efficiency, as resources are only consumed as needed.

High availability is a key feature of VMSS. Scale sets distribute virtual machines across multiple fault domains and update domains within an Azure region. Fault domains protect against hardware failures by ensuring that VMs are not placed on the same physical server or network segment, reducing the risk of downtime due to single points of failure. Update domains, on the other hand, allow for rolling updates of the VM instances, ensuring that maintenance operations, such as patches or upgrades, do not affect the availability of the application. This architecture ensures that critical workloads remain operational even during maintenance events or hardware issues, supporting the high availability requirements of enterprise-grade applications.

VMSS also integrates tightly with Azure Monitor, allowing organizations to define autoscaling rules based on metrics such as CPU usage, memory utilization, disk I/O, or custom-defined application metrics. These rules can dynamically adjust the number of VM instances in real-time, ensuring that applications maintain performance during spikes in demand while minimizing costs during off-peak periods. Integration with monitoring and alerting systems allows IT teams to gain insights into performance trends, resource utilization, and potential bottlenecks, enabling proactive management of workloads.

While other Azure services provide valuable networking and traffic management capabilities, they do not address the automatic scaling of compute resources. For instance, Azure Load Balancer efficiently distributes incoming traffic across multiple VMs, ensuring even load distribution, but it does not dynamically add or remove VMs in response to workload changes. Similarly, Azure Traffic Manager routes users to the nearest or healthiest endpoints globally, improving application performance and availability, but it does not scale the backend VM infrastructure automatically. Azure Application Gateway provides regional Layer 7 load balancing, SSL offload, and web application firewall capabilities, and while it supports URL-based routing and security features, it does not offer VM autoscaling or direct integration with monitoring-based scaling triggers.

The correct choice for a solution that provides automatic scaling, high availability, and seamless integration with monitoring tools is therefore Virtual Machine Scale Sets. VMSS allows organizations to efficiently manage large-scale workloads, maintain consistent application performance, and optimize operational costs by dynamically adjusting resources according to demand. Its combination of autoscale rules, fault and update domain distribution, and monitoring integration ensures that applications remain resilient, responsive, and cost-effective. Other services focus primarily on traffic distribution, routing, or security features and cannot deliver the dynamic scaling and high-availability functionality provided by VMSS. Consequently, Virtual Machine Scale Sets represent the ideal choice for workloads that require automated scalability and robust infrastructure management.

Question 103

You need to design a solution for disaster recovery of Azure virtual machines across regions with minimal downtime. Which Azure service should you recommend?

A) Azure Site Recovery
B) Azure Backup
C) Azure Blob Storage
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Azure Site Recovery

Explanation:

Azure Site Recovery (ASR) is a comprehensive disaster recovery solution designed to ensure business continuity for both Azure-based and on-premises workloads. It provides seamless replication of virtual machines, enabling organizations to maintain high availability and recover quickly from regional outages or catastrophic failures. ASR supports automated failover and failback, ensuring that applications and services remain operational with minimal downtime. By continuously replicating workloads from the primary location to a secondary Azure region, Site Recovery ensures that data and system configurations are preserved, helping businesses meet stringent recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs).

One of the key strengths of Azure Site Recovery is its ability to orchestrate multi-tier application recovery. Many enterprise applications rely on complex architectures with multiple interdependent services and databases. ASR ensures that these applications are recovered in the correct order to maintain consistency and functionality. It provides pre-configured recovery plans that automate the failover process, reducing manual intervention during emergencies. Additionally, ASR allows organizations to perform test failovers without impacting production workloads. This capability enables IT teams to validate disaster recovery strategies, identify potential issues, and ensure that recovery procedures are effective before a real outage occurs. Continuous monitoring of replication health provides visibility into the status of protected workloads and alerts administrators to any issues, allowing proactive management of the disaster recovery environment.

While Azure Backup offers a reliable solution for data protection by providing point-in-time recovery of virtual machines and other resources, it does not provide real-time replication or automated failover capabilities. Backup solutions are effective for restoring data after accidental deletion or corruption, but they do not maintain continuous availability or orchestrate failover in the event of a regional outage. Similarly, Azure Blob Storage is optimized for unstructured data storage and can serve as a destination for backups; however, it does not replicate full virtual machines, manage recovery plans, or orchestrate failover processes. Azure Key Vault provides secure storage for encryption keys, secrets, and certificates but does not address disaster recovery or replication of workloads, making it unsuitable for scenarios where business continuity depends on rapid VM recovery.

The correct disaster recovery solution must be able to replicate virtual machines across regions, orchestrate failover and failback, and ensure that multi-tier applications are recovered in a consistent and reliable manner. Azure Site Recovery meets these requirements comprehensively. By providing continuous replication, automated recovery orchestration, test failover capabilities, and monitoring, ASR enables organizations to maintain uptime and minimize operational disruptions during unplanned outages. Other services such as Azure Backup, Blob Storage, and Key Vault focus on data protection, storage, or key management but do not provide the real-time replication, failover automation, or multi-tier application recovery required for robust disaster recovery.

Azure Site Recovery is the ideal choice for organizations seeking a full-featured disaster recovery solution. It ensures that workloads are continuously replicated, failover processes are automated and tested, and multi-tier applications can be recovered with minimal downtime. Its focus on high availability, consistency, and operational monitoring makes it a superior option compared with alternatives that only offer backup, storage, or key management capabilities. Therefore, Azure Site Recovery is the correct selection for disaster recovery and business continuity in Azure environments.

Question 104

You need to design a solution to monitor application performance and detect anomalies across multiple Azure services. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Monitor
B) Azure Security Center
C) Azure Traffic Manager
D) Azure Key Vault

Answer: A) Azure Monitor

Explanation:

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive platform for monitoring the performance and health of applications and resources within the Azure ecosystem. It centralizes the collection of telemetry data, including metrics, logs, and diagnostic information, enabling organizations to gain a holistic view of their cloud and hybrid environments. This telemetry provides valuable insights into the operational status of applications, virtual machines, networks, and other Azure services, allowing IT teams to proactively detect and respond to performance issues before they impact end users. By consolidating data from multiple sources, Azure Monitor eliminates the need for fragmented monitoring solutions and provides a single pane of glass for managing performance, reliability, and availability across all resources.

A key component of Azure Monitor is Application Insights, which specializes in deep application-level diagnostics. Application Insights tracks critical application metrics, including response times, request rates, failed requests, and external dependencies, providing developers and IT administrators with detailed insights into application behavior. It can detect anomalies in real time, such as performance degradation or unexpected failures, and helps pinpoint the root causes of issues. This level of diagnostic detail enables rapid troubleshooting, improves application reliability, and supports ongoing performance optimization. With customizable dashboards and visualizations, teams can quickly assess the health of their applications and infrastructure, making it easier to prioritize issues and track resolution progress.

Azure Monitor also integrates seamlessly with Action Groups, which allow automated responses to detected conditions. Action Groups can trigger notifications via email, SMS, or other communication channels, or even initiate automated remediation actions, such as scaling resources or restarting services. This integration enables organizations to respond proactively to incidents, reducing downtime and minimizing the impact of performance problems on business operations. By combining telemetry collection, analytics, anomaly detection, and automation, Azure Monitor empowers teams to maintain high service levels and ensure consistent application performance.

In comparison, Azure Security Center is focused on identifying security threats, managing vulnerabilities, and ensuring compliance with organizational policies. While it provides valuable security insights, it does not offer the detailed application and infrastructure performance monitoring or anomaly detection capabilities required for maintaining operational health. Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based traffic routing service that directs users to the nearest or healthiest endpoints, improving application availability and responsiveness. However, it does not collect telemetry data, monitor metrics, or detect anomalies within the application itself. Azure Key Vault is designed for secure storage of encryption keys, secrets, and certificates and does not provide monitoring, telemetry, or alerting functionality.

The ideal monitoring solution must provide centralized visibility, detect performance anomalies, and offer actionable insights across applications and infrastructure. Azure Monitor fulfills all of these requirements. It collects comprehensive telemetry, analyzes application and resource performance, and enables automated alerting and remediation. By integrating Application Insights for deep diagnostics and Action Groups for responsive actions, Azure Monitor provides end-to-end observability and operational control. Other services focus on security, traffic management, or key management, and cannot provide a complete solution for monitoring, diagnostics, and proactive issue resolution. Therefore, Azure Monitor is the correct choice for organizations seeking centralized, actionable, and comprehensive monitoring of applications and Azure resources.

Question 105

You need to design a solution for storing unstructured data such as images, videos, and logs with automated tiered storage to reduce costs. Which service should you recommend?

A) Azure Blob Storage
B) Azure Table Storage
C) Azure File Storage
D) Azure SQL Database

Answer: A) Azure Blob Storage

Explanation:

Azure Blob Storage is a highly scalable and cost-efficient storage solution designed specifically for storing unstructured data. Unstructured data refers to data that does not conform to a predefined schema, such as images, videos, audio files, logs, backups, and other media or document types. Unlike structured data stored in databases, unstructured data often comes in large volumes and requires a storage solution capable of handling varying file sizes and access patterns. Azure Blob Storage fulfills this need by providing robust, scalable, and secure storage that can accommodate the demands of modern applications and workloads.

One of the key advantages of Azure Blob Storage is its support for multiple access tiers, which allow organizations to optimize storage costs based on how frequently data is accessed. The hot tier is designed for frequently accessed data and provides low latency and high throughput for active workloads. The cool tier is intended for infrequently accessed data, offering lower storage costs while maintaining accessibility for data that is not needed as often. The archive tier is the most cost-effective option for long-term storage of rarely accessed data, such as historical backups or compliance records. By selecting the appropriate tier, organizations can balance cost and performance effectively, ensuring that they only pay for the level of access required for their data.

In addition to tiered storage, Azure Blob Storage includes automated lifecycle management policies. These policies allow organizations to define rules that automatically move data between tiers based on its age or access patterns, or even delete data that is no longer required. This automation reduces operational overhead, helps maintain cost efficiency, and ensures that storage resources are used optimally without manual intervention. For example, a policy can automatically move a video file from the hot tier to the cool tier after 30 days of inactivity and eventually to the archive tier after 180 days, ensuring minimal storage costs over the data’s lifecycle.

Durability and high availability are critical for enterprise storage solutions, and Azure Blob Storage addresses this through multiple replication options. Locally Redundant Storage (LRS) replicates data within a single data center to protect against hardware failures. Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) replicates data to a secondary region, providing disaster recovery capabilities in case of regional outages. Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS) extends this by enabling read access to the secondary region, ensuring continuous availability even during failover scenarios. These replication strategies guarantee that data is not only stored securely but also remains accessible when needed.

Other Azure storage options, such as Azure Table Storage, Azure File Storage, and Azure SQL Database, are not optimized for the storage of large volumes of unstructured data. Table Storage is a NoSQL key-value store suited for structured data and cannot handle files like images or videos efficiently. File Storage offers shared file systems via SMB or NFS protocols but does not provide automated tiering or cost optimization for large datasets. SQL Database is a relational database service designed for structured transactional data and is unsuitable for storing unstructured content at scale.

Given the need for scalable, secure, cost-effective storage for unstructured data, with features like access tiers, lifecycle management, and high durability, Azure Blob Storage clearly stands out as the optimal choice. It is specifically engineered to handle modern workloads requiring unstructured data storage while providing automated cost optimization and operational efficiency. Therefore, for scenarios that demand reliable storage of large unstructured datasets, Azure Blob Storage is the most appropriate solution.