Isaca  CISM Certified Information Security Manager Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 11 Q151-165

Visit here for our full Isaca CISM exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 151:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise business continuity management (BCM) programs?

A) Allowing business units to develop continuity plans independently without centralized governance, risk assessment, or testing
B) Establishing a structured BCM program including governance, business impact analysis, risk assessment, continuity strategy, plan development, testing, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on backup systems without defined procedures, plans, or coordinated recovery strategies
D) Addressing business continuity only after disruptions, operational losses, or regulatory findings occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Business continuity management (BCM) programs are critical for ensuring that organizations can continue operations during and after disruptions, including natural disasters, cyber incidents, and operational failures. Option B, establishing a structured BCM program including governance, business impact analysis, risk assessment, continuity strategy, plan development, testing, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a comprehensive, enterprise-aligned, and proactive approach. Allowing individual business units to develop plans independently (Option A) results in inconsistent procedures, coverage gaps, a lack of coordination, and ineffective response during crises. Relying solely on backup systems (Option C) ensures data preservation but does not address operational continuity, prioritization, dependencies, or communication requirements. Addressing continuity only after disruptions occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to significant operational, financial, regulatory, and reputational risks.

A mature BCM program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Business impact analysis identifies critical processes, dependencies, resources, recovery time objectives, and financial, operational, and reputational impacts of potential disruptions. Risk assessment evaluates threats, vulnerabilities, likelihood, and potential impact to prioritize continuity strategies. Continuity strategies determine alternative operations, redundancies, recovery solutions, and resource allocation to ensure minimal disruption. Plan development documents procedures, responsibilities, communication protocols, recovery sequences, and escalation processes for operational resilience. Testing and exercises validate the effectiveness of plans, identify gaps, and improve readiness. Monitoring tracks plan adherence, incident response performance, and evolving threats. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure recovery time objectives, downtime reduction, plan effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from disruptions, audits, regulatory updates, technological advancements, and operational feedback to refine governance, risk assessment, continuity strategies, plans, testing, monitoring, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate employees, management, and stakeholders on roles, responsibilities, and procedures during continuity events. Implementing a structured BCM program enhances operational resilience, ensures regulatory compliance, supports informed decision-making, strengthens stakeholder confidence, and mitigates financial and reputational risks. Proactive governance, business impact analysis, risk assessment, continuity strategies, plan development, testing, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure BCM evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and operational requirements, transforming continuity management into a strategic capability supporting long-term organizational resilience, reliability, and sustainability.

Question 152:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise compliance management programs?

A) Allowing departments to interpret and implement regulatory requirements independently without centralized oversight, policies, or monitoring
B) Establishing a structured compliance management program including governance, regulatory mapping, risk assessment, policies, monitoring, training, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on legal advice without operational integration, internal controls, or ongoing monitoring
D) Addressing compliance issues only after regulatory penalties, audit findings, or operational failures occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Compliance management programs are essential for ensuring that the organization adheres to applicable laws, regulations, standards, and contractual obligations. Option B, establishing a structured compliance management program including governance, regulatory mapping, risk assessment, policies, monitoring, training, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to interpret regulations independently (Option A) creates inconsistencies, gaps, and non-compliance risks. Relying solely on legal advice (Option C) may provide interpretation, but does not ensure operational integration, internal controls, or proactive monitoring. Addressing compliance issues only after penalties or incidents (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to fines, operational disruption, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny.

A mature compliance management program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Regulatory mapping identifies applicable laws, industry standards, contractual obligations, and internal policies. Risk assessment evaluates areas of potential non-compliance, operational impact, likelihood, and regulatory penalties to prioritize mitigation efforts. Policies and procedures define how regulations will be implemented, monitored, and enforced across operations. Monitoring tracks adherence to policies, internal control effectiveness, and emerging regulatory changes. Training programs educate employees, management, and stakeholders on compliance requirements, responsibilities, and operational implementation. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure compliance adherence, risk reduction, incident rates, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from regulatory changes, audits, incidents, operational feedback, and emerging risks to refine governance, policies, monitoring, and reporting processes. Implementing a structured compliance management program strengthens risk management, ensures regulatory adherence, supports operational efficiency, enhances stakeholder confidence, reduces the likelihood of penalties, and aligns business processes with regulatory expectations. Proactive governance, regulatory mapping, risk assessment, policies, monitoring, training, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure compliance management evolves with organizational objectives, emerging regulations, and operational dynamics, transforming it into a strategic capability supporting sustainable, ethical, and law-abiding operations across the enterprise.

Question 153:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise vulnerability management programs?

A) Allowing IT teams to identify and remediate vulnerabilities independently without centralized policies, risk prioritization, or monitoring
B) Establishing a structured vulnerability management program including governance, risk-based prioritization, scanning, remediation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated vulnerability scanning tools without policies, risk assessment, or remediation tracking
D) Addressing vulnerabilities only after breaches, incidents, or audit findings

Answer: B

Explanation:

Vulnerability management programs are critical for proactively identifying, assessing, and mitigating security weaknesses in IT systems to reduce risk exposure. Option B, establishing a structured vulnerability management program including governance, risk-based prioritization, scanning, remediation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a comprehensive, enterprise-aligned, and proactive approach. Allowing IT teams to act independently (Option A) leads to inconsistent identification, remediation gaps, and delayed response. Relying solely on automated scanning (Option C) identifies potential vulnerabilities but cannot enforce remediation, prioritize risk, or ensure governance alignment. Addressing vulnerabilities only after breaches occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational disruption, financial loss, reputational harm, and regulatory penalties.

A mature vulnerability management program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Risk-based prioritization evaluates vulnerabilities according to potential impact, exploitability, business criticality, and exposure. Scanning identifies vulnerabilities across systems, applications, network devices, and endpoints using automated tools, validated by manual assessment as needed. Remediation involves patching, configuration changes, mitigation controls, or compensating measures to reduce exposure. Monitoring tracks vulnerability remediation progress, emerging threats, recurring weaknesses, and compliance with internal policies. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure vulnerability closure rates, risk reduction, remediation effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incidents, emerging threats, audit findings, technological changes, and operational feedback to refine governance, risk prioritization, scanning methodologies, remediation processes, and monitoring practices. Training and awareness programs educate IT personnel, management, and stakeholders on vulnerability identification, risk prioritization, remediation responsibilities, and compliance requirements. Implementing a structured vulnerability management program enhances security posture, reduces exposure to exploits, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens operational resilience, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, risk-based prioritization, scanning, remediation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure the program evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming vulnerability management into a strategic capability supporting long-term cybersecurity resilience, operational continuity, and risk reduction.

Question 154:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise information security awareness programs?

A) Allowing departments to conduct ad hoc awareness initiatives without centralized governance, policies, or metrics
B) Establishing a structured information security awareness program, including governance, training content, periodic assessments, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated notifications or phishing simulations without educational content, engagement, or monitoring
D) Addressing awareness deficiencies only after security incidents, breaches, or audit findings

Answer: B

Explanation:

Information security awareness programs are critical for educating employees on security threats, policies, responsibilities, and best practices to reduce human-related risk. Option B, establishing a structured information security awareness program including governance, training content, periodic assessments, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to conduct ad hoc initiatives (Option A) results in inconsistent coverage, limited engagement, and insufficient behavioral change. Relying solely on automated notifications or phishing simulations (Option C) identifies risk exposure but does not provide comprehensive education, engagement, or reinforcement. Addressing awareness deficiencies only after incidents (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to preventable breaches, operational disruption, financial loss, and reputational damage.

A mature awareness program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Training content covers policies, procedures, threat identification, secure practices, regulatory requirements, and social engineering prevention. Periodic assessments, tests, or simulated exercises validate knowledge, engagement, and retention. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure program participation, comprehension, behavioral changes, and reduction in incidents caused by human error.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incidents, audit findings, regulatory changes, emerging threats, and employee feedback to refine governance, content, assessments, and engagement strategies. Awareness initiatives may include mandatory training, newsletters, posters, gamification, and scenario-based exercises. Implementing a structured awareness program reduces human-related risks, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens security culture, enhances operational resilience, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, structured training, assessments, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure the program evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming information security awareness into a strategic capability supporting long-term organizational security, compliance, and operational success.

Question 155:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise mobile device security programs?

A) Allowing departments or users to configure and manage mobile devices independently without centralized policies, controls, or monitoring
B) Establishing a structured mobile device security program, including governance, policies, device enrollment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on mobile device management (MDM) tools without defining policies, enforcement mechanisms, or compliance checks
D) Addressing mobile device security breaches only after incidents, data loss, or regulatory penalties occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Mobile device security programs are essential for protecting sensitive enterprise data, maintaining operational integrity, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Option B, establishing a structured mobile device security program including governance, policies, device enrollment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments or users to manage devices independently (Option A) increases risk exposure, inconsistencies, data leakage, and regulatory noncompliance. Relying solely on MDM tools (Option C) provides technical enforcement but cannot ensure policy adherence, operational governance, or compliance alignment. Addressing breaches only after incidents (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to financial, reputational, operational, and regulatory risks.

A mature mobile device security program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define acceptable use, device enrollment, security requirements, application controls, data protection, and regulatory compliance. Device enrollment ensures that only authorized devices can access enterprise systems and data. Configuration standards enforce encryption, authentication, application restrictions, and security updates. Monitoring tracks device compliance, potential threats, anomalous behavior, and adherence to policies. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure compliance rates, security incidents, remediation effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from security incidents, audit findings, emerging threats, technological changes, and user feedback to refine governance, policies, device standards, monitoring, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate employees on mobile device policies, secure practices, incident reporting, and compliance obligations. Implementing a structured mobile device security program enhances data protection, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens operational resilience, reduces the risk of breaches, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, policies, device enrollment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure the program evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming mobile device security into a strategic capability supporting long-term operational integrity, data security, and enterprise resilience.

Question 156:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise data classification and protection programs?

A) Allowing departments to classify and protect data independently without centralized policies, standards, or monitoring
B) Establishing a structured data classification and protection program, including governance, policies, classification standards, access controls, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on encryption or automated tools without establishing policies, classification procedures, or access monitoring
D) Addressing data protection issues only after breaches, unauthorized access, or regulatory penalties occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Data classification and protection programs are essential for safeguarding sensitive enterprise information, maintaining regulatory compliance, and mitigating risks associated with unauthorized access, data breaches, or operational losses. Option B, establishing a structured data classification and protection program including governance, policies, classification standards, access controls, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to classify and protect data independently (Option A) leads to inconsistent practices, misclassification, gaps in protection, and non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Relying solely on encryption or automated tools (Option C) protects data technically but does not address classification accuracy, governance oversight, or monitoring for compliance. Addressing data protection issues only after breaches occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational, financial, and reputational risks.

A mature data classification and protection program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define classification categories, handling procedures, access requirements, encryption standards, retention, and disposal criteria. Classification standards categorize data based on sensitivity, confidentiality, regulatory obligations, business criticality, and risk exposure. Access controls enforce the principle of least privilege, ensuring that users can only access information necessary for their roles. Monitoring tracks data usage, access anomalies, policy violations, and unauthorized activities. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure compliance rates, classification accuracy, incidents of unauthorized access, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from breaches, audit findings, regulatory updates, technological advancements, and operational feedback to refine governance, policies, classification standards, access controls, monitoring, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate employees, management, and stakeholders on proper data classification, handling procedures, access responsibilities, and regulatory compliance. Implementing a structured data classification and protection program ensures that sensitive information is properly identified, adequately protected, monitored for compliance, and consistently handled across the enterprise. Proactive governance, policies, classification standards, access controls, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement transform data protection into a strategic capability supporting long-term enterprise security, operational resilience, compliance adherence, and stakeholder confidence.

Question 157:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise third-party/vendor risk management programs?

A) Allowing business units to engage vendors independently without due diligence, governance, or risk assessment
B) Establishing a structured third-party risk management program, including governance, vendor assessment, contractual obligations, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on contractual agreements or insurance without monitoring vendor performance or assessing risks
D) Addressing vendor risks only after incidents, breaches, or service failures occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Third-party/vendor risk management programs are crucial for managing risks introduced by external entities, including suppliers, contractors, and service providers, which could affect enterprise operations, data security, compliance, and reputation. Option B, establishing a structured third-party risk management program including governance, vendor assessment, contractual obligations, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing business units to engage vendors independently (Option A) increases exposure to operational, security, compliance, and reputational risks. Relying solely on contracts or insurance (Option C) provides legal protection but does not address real-time performance monitoring, risk assessment, or operational alignment. Addressing vendor risks only after incidents or failures occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to significant operational disruption, financial loss, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.

A mature third-party risk management program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Vendor assessment includes due diligence, risk evaluation, security posture review, financial stability checks, compliance alignment, and operational capability verification. Contractual obligations define service level agreements, security requirements, reporting obligations, and regulatory compliance mandates. Monitoring tracks vendor performance, compliance with contractual obligations, risk exposure, incident reporting, and operational continuity. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure vendor risk levels, incident frequency, SLA adherence, risk mitigation effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from vendor incidents, audit findings, operational feedback, technological changes, and regulatory updates to refine governance, assessment procedures, monitoring processes, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate procurement teams, business units, and management on vendor risk assessment, contractual obligations, monitoring responsibilities, and compliance requirements. Implementing a structured third-party risk management program strengthens operational resilience, reduces potential disruptions, ensures regulatory compliance, mitigates financial and reputational exposure, and enhances stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, vendor assessment, contractual obligations, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure that the program evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and operational requirements, transforming vendor risk management into a strategic capability supporting long-term organizational sustainability, risk reduction, and operational excellence.

Question 158:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise identity and access governance programs?

A) Allowing departments to manage identities and access rights independently without centralized policies, monitoring, or review
B) Establishing a structured identity and access governance program, including governance, role definitions, entitlement management, periodic access reviews, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated identity management systems without policy enforcement, access review, or risk assessment
D) Addressing access governance only after unauthorized activity, breaches, or audit findings

Answer: B

Explanation:

Identity and access governance (IAG) programs are essential for ensuring that enterprise users, contractors, and partners have appropriate access aligned with their roles and responsibilities, reducing the risk of unauthorized access, fraud, and compliance violations. Option B, establishing a structured identity and access governance program including governance, role definitions, entitlement management, periodic access reviews, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to manage access independently (Option A) creates inconsistencies, excessive access, policy gaps, and increased security risks. Relying solely on automated identity management systems (Option C) enforces technical controls but cannot ensure policy compliance, role alignment, or periodic review. Addressing access governance only after incidents occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational, financial, compliance, and reputational risks.

A mature IAG program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Role definitions clarify access requirements, responsibilities, and segregation of duties. Entitlement management governs the provisioning, modification, and de-provisioning of access to applications, systems, and data. Periodic access reviews ensure that privileges remain appropriate over time and identify excessive or orphaned accounts. Monitoring tracks access activity, policy violations, anomalous behavior, and emerging threats. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure compliance, policy enforcement, access changes, incident frequency, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from access incidents, audit findings, technological advancements, regulatory updates, and operational feedback to refine governance, role definitions, entitlement management, monitoring, and review processes. Training and awareness programs educate employees, management, and IT personnel on access policies, responsibilities, and operational controls. Implementing a structured IAG program strengthens access control, reduces the risk of unauthorized activity, ensures regulatory compliance, supports operational efficiency, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, role-based access, entitlement management, periodic reviews, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure IAG evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming access governance into a strategic capability supporting long-term enterprise security, operational integrity, and compliance adherence.

Question 159:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise IT risk management programs?

A) Allowing IT teams to assess and manage risks independently without governance, policies, or executive oversight
B) Establishing a structured IT risk management program, including governance, risk identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on risk registers or automated risk scoring tools without policy enforcement, mitigation, or executive review
D) Addressing IT risks only after incidents, audit findings, or operational failures occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

IT risk management programs are critical for identifying, assessing, mitigating, and monitoring risks associated with information systems, applications, infrastructure, and processes to ensure operational continuity, regulatory compliance, and business alignment. Option B, establishing a structured IT risk management program including governance, risk identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing IT teams to manage risks independently (Option A) results in inconsistent risk identification, prioritization gaps, and uncoordinated mitigation strategies. Relying solely on risk registers or automated scoring (Option C) provides documentation and assessment but does not enforce mitigation, monitoring, or executive oversight. Addressing IT risks only after incidents occur (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational disruption, financial loss, compliance issues, and reputational harm.

A mature IT risk management program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Risk identification catalogs potential threats, vulnerabilities, and operational dependencies across systems, applications, networks, and processes. Risk assessment evaluates the likelihood, potential impact, and interdependencies and prioritizes mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies include preventive controls, compensating measures, risk acceptance, transfer, or avoidance aligned with enterprise risk appetite. Monitoring tracks risk trends, mitigation effectiveness, emerging threats, and compliance with policies. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure risk exposure, mitigation success, incident reduction, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incidents, audit findings, technological developments, regulatory updates, and operational feedback to refine governance, identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring, and reporting processes. Training and awareness programs educate IT staff, management, and stakeholders on risk responsibilities, risk assessment methodology, and mitigation strategies. Implementing a structured IT risk management program enhances operational resilience, reduces exposure to security and operational risks, ensures compliance, supports informed decision-making, strengthens stakeholder confidence, and aligns IT risk with enterprise risk management objectives. Proactive governance, risk identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure the program evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming IT risk management into a strategic capability supporting long-term operational resilience, enterprise security, and business continuity.

Question 160:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise cloud security programs?

A) Allowing business units to deploy cloud services independently without centralized governance, policies, or risk assessment
B) Establishing a structured cloud security program, including governance, policies, risk assessment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on cloud service provider controls without implementing enterprise policies, monitoring, or risk evaluation
D) Addressing cloud security incidents only after breaches, operational disruption, or audit findings

Answer: B

Explanation:

Cloud security programs are essential for managing risks associated with cloud services, ensuring data protection, compliance, operational integrity, and enterprise alignment. Option B, establishing a structured cloud security program including governance, policies, risk assessment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing business units to deploy services independently (Option A) leads to inconsistent security controls, misconfigurations, data exposure, and regulatory non-compliance. Relying solely on cloud provider controls (Option C) provides baseline protection but does not address enterprise-specific policies, monitoring, or compliance requirements. Addressing cloud security incidents only after breaches (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational disruption, financial loss, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties.

A mature cloud security program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define cloud usage, data handling, identity management, access control, configuration standards, compliance, and monitoring requirements. Risk assessment evaluates threats, vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, and operational impacts specific to cloud environments. Configuration standards enforce secure settings, access policies, encryption, patching, and logging. Monitoring tracks cloud usage, compliance adherence, anomalous activity, policy violations, and emerging threats. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure policy compliance, incident frequency, configuration drift, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incidents, audit findings, technological changes, regulatory updates, and operational feedback to refine governance, policies, risk assessment, configuration standards, monitoring, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate employees, IT personnel, and stakeholders on secure cloud usage, policy compliance, and incident reporting. Implementing a structured cloud security program enhances data protection, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens operational resilience, reduces exposure to security incidents, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, policies, risk assessment, configuration standards, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure cloud security evolves with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming cloud security into a strategic capability supporting long-term operational integrity, data security, and enterprise resilience.

Question 161:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise incident response management programs?

A) Allowing business units to respond to incidents independently without centralized procedures, escalation, or reporting
B) Establishing a structured incident response management program, including governance, policies, procedures, escalation protocols, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated alerting systems without predefined procedures, roles, or communication plans
D) Addressing incidents only after they cause operational disruption, data loss, or regulatory findings

Answer: B

Explanation:

Incident response management programs are critical for ensuring organizations can detect, respond to, and recover from cybersecurity events, operational disruptions, or data breaches in a coordinated and effective manner. Option B, establishing a structured incident response management program including governance, policies, procedures, escalation protocols, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing business units to respond independently (Option A) results in inconsistent procedures, delayed response, lack of coordination, and ineffective mitigation. Relying solely on automated alerting systems (Option C) identifies potential incidents but does not provide actionable guidance, defined roles, or communication plans, which are necessary for effective containment and recovery. Addressing incidents only after operational impact or regulatory findings (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to financial, operational, reputational, and compliance risks.

A mature incident response management program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define incident types, severity classification, roles and responsibilities, communication protocols, reporting requirements, and legal obligations. Procedures document the steps for identification, containment, mitigation, eradication, recovery, and post-incident analysis. Escalation protocols define thresholds for notifying management, internal stakeholders, regulatory authorities, and external partners. Monitoring tracks security events, anomalous activity, policy violations, and emerging threats. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure incident detection times, response effectiveness, containment efficiency, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incident reports, after-action reviews, audit findings, technological changes, and regulatory updates to refine governance, policies, procedures, escalation protocols, monitoring, and reporting. Training and awareness programs educate employees, IT personnel, and management on roles, responsibilities, detection techniques, and reporting processes. Implementing a structured incident response management program ensures timely and effective response, reduces operational impact, enhances compliance, strengthens stakeholder confidence, and mitigates the risks associated with disruptions, breaches, and operational failures. Proactive governance, structured procedures, defined escalation protocols, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement transform incident response into a strategic capability supporting long-term enterprise resilience, security, and operational continuity.

Question 162:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise encryption and data protection programs?

A) Allowing departments to choose encryption solutions independently without governance, policies, or key management
B) Establishing a structured encryption and data protection program, including governance, policies, key management, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on vendor-provided encryption technologies without defining enterprise standards, policies, or compliance verification
D) Addressing encryption and data protection requirements only after breaches, regulatory penalties, or data loss occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Encryption and data protection programs are essential for safeguarding sensitive data, ensuring confidentiality, regulatory compliance, and mitigating risks associated with unauthorized access, data breaches, or operational loss. Option B, establishing a structured encryption and data protection program including governance, policies, key management, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to choose encryption solutions independently (Option A) leads to inconsistent protection levels, weak key management, and compliance gaps. Relying solely on vendor-provided encryption technologies (Option C) may address technical needs but does not ensure enterprise alignment, policy enforcement, or monitoring. Addressing encryption only after breaches or regulatory penalties (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to significant operational, financial, and reputational risk.

A mature encryption and data protection program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define encryption requirements, data classification alignment, key management procedures, operational responsibilities, regulatory compliance, and lifecycle management. Key management ensures secure generation, storage, rotation, distribution, and retirement of encryption keys. Monitoring tracks key usage, unauthorized access attempts, encryption compliance, and emerging threats. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure encryption coverage, key rotation adherence, incidents prevented, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from security incidents, audit findings, regulatory updates, technological advancements, and operational feedback to refine governance, policies, key management practices, monitoring, and reporting processes. Training and awareness programs educate employees, IT personnel, and management on encryption policies, operational responsibilities, key handling, and compliance requirements. Implementing a structured encryption and data protection program enhances confidentiality, integrity, and compliance, reduces exposure to breaches, strengthens operational resilience, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, policy enforcement, key management, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure that encryption and data protection evolve with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and regulatory requirements, transforming these functions into strategic capabilities supporting long-term data security, operational integrity, and compliance adherence.

Question 163:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise audit and assurance programs?

A) Allowing departments to conduct audits independently without enterprise standards, methodology, or oversight
B) Establishing a structured enterprise audit and assurance program, including governance, standardized methodology, risk-based planning, reporting, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on external audit reports without internal assessment, monitoring, or follow-up
D) Addressing audit findings only after regulatory enforcement actions, operational failures, or financial losses

Answer: B

Explanation:

Enterprise audit and assurance programs provide independent, objective evaluations of risk management, control effectiveness, and compliance, supporting informed decision-making and operational resilience. Option B, establishing a structured enterprise audit and assurance program including governance, standardized methodology, risk-based planning, reporting, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, systematic, and enterprise-aligned approach. Allowing departments to audit independently (Option A) results in inconsistent findings, gaps in coverage, and limited assurance. Relying solely on external audits (Option C) provides external verification but lacks internal insight, operational alignment, and proactive risk identification. Addressing audit findings only after regulatory or operational failures (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to financial, operational, reputational, and compliance risks.

A mature audit and assurance program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Standardized methodologies define planning, risk assessment, testing procedures, reporting, and follow-up processes. Risk-based planning prioritizes audit activities based on risk exposure, business criticality, regulatory requirements, and operational dependencies. Reporting provides actionable recommendations, highlights control gaps, and communicates findings to management, the board, and stakeholders. Monitoring tracks remediation, control improvements, recurring issues, and emerging risks. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure audit coverage, recommendations implemented, control effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from audit results, regulatory updates, operational changes, technological advances, and stakeholder feedback to refine governance, methodologies, planning, monitoring, and reporting processes. Training and awareness programs educate auditors, management, and stakeholders on audit objectives, methodology, risk assessment, and reporting. Implementing a structured enterprise audit and assurance program enhances control effectiveness, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens operational resilience, reduces risk exposure, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, standardized methodology, risk-based planning, reporting, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure that audit and assurance evolve with enterprise objectives, emerging risks, and regulatory requirements, transforming them into strategic capabilities supporting long-term operational integrity, governance, and risk management.

Question 164:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise backup and recovery programs?

A) Allowing individual departments to manage backups and recovery independently without standardized policies, schedules, or testing
B) Establishing a structured backup and recovery program, including governance, policies, backup schedules, recovery procedures, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated backup solutions without policies, recovery verification, or monitoring
D) Addressing backup failures or data loss incidents only after operational disruption occurs

Answer: B

Explanation:

Backup and recovery programs are critical for ensuring data availability, operational continuity, and business resilience during system failures, data corruption, or cyber incidents. Option B, establishing a structured backup and recovery program including governance, policies, backup schedules, recovery procedures, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to manage backups independently (Option A) results in inconsistent protection, missed schedules, inadequate retention, and untested recovery processes. Relying solely on automated backup solutions (Option C) ensures data capture but does not validate recoverability, enforce policies, or monitor effectiveness. Addressing backup failures only after data loss or disruption (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational, financial, and reputational risks.

A mature backup and recovery program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define backup frequency, retention, storage locations, encryption, access control, and compliance requirements. Backup schedules ensure that critical data is captured consistently and securely. Recovery procedures document the steps for data restoration, system recovery, and verification of data integrity. Monitoring tracks backup completion, failures, storage utilization, and potential gaps. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure backup success rates, recovery time objectives (RTOs), recovery point objectives (RPOs), and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from failures, testing results, technological advancements, regulatory updates, and operational feedback to refine governance, policies, schedules, recovery procedures, monitoring, and reporting. Testing and verification validate that backups can be restored efficiently and meet business requirements. Training and awareness programs educate IT personnel, management, and stakeholders on backup policies, recovery procedures, and incident response. Implementing a structured backup and recovery program enhances operational resilience, ensures data integrity, supports regulatory compliance, reduces downtime, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, policies, scheduling, recovery procedures, monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure that backup and recovery programs evolve with enterprise objectives, emerging risks, and operational requirements, transforming them into strategic capabilities supporting long-term enterprise continuity, operational integrity, and business resilience.

Question 165:

Which of the following is the most effective approach to implement enterprise logging and monitoring programs?

A) Allowing departments to configure logging independently without centralized policies, standards, or review
B) Establishing a structured logging and monitoring program, including governance, policies, log collection standards, analysis, alerting, metrics, and continuous improvement
C) Relying solely on automated logging tools without defining policies, analysis procedures, or incident correlation
D) Addressing security or operational events only after incidents occur

Answer: B

Explanation:

Logging and monitoring programs are essential for detecting anomalies, potential security incidents, operational failures, and compliance violations in a timely and coordinated manner. Option B, establishing a structured logging and monitoring program including governance, policies, log collection standards, analysis, alerting, metrics, and continuous improvement, is the most effective because it provides a proactive, enterprise-aligned, and systematic approach. Allowing departments to configure logging independently (Option A) leads to inconsistent coverage, missing critical events, and insufficient correlation for timely detection. Relying solely on automated logging tools (Option C) captures raw data but does not provide actionable insights, enforce policies, or support incident correlation. Addressing events only after incidents (Option D) is reactive and exposes the organization to operational, financial, and reputational risks.

A mature logging and monitoring program begins with governance and executive sponsorship to establish authority, accountability, and alignment with enterprise objectives. Policies define log sources, retention requirements, access controls, monitoring responsibilities, analysis procedures, and regulatory compliance mandates. Log collection standards specify what events are recorded, the format, and the storage requirements. Analysis and alerting identify anomalies, potential breaches, performance degradation, and policy violations. Monitoring ensures timely detection, incident escalation, and correlation across systems. Metrics, KPIs, and KRIs measure coverage, incident detection times, alert effectiveness, and program maturity.

Continuous improvement incorporates lessons learned from incidents, audit findings, regulatory updates, technological advancements, and operational feedback to refine governance, policies, collection standards, analysis, alerting, and reporting practices. Training and awareness programs educate IT staff, management, and stakeholders on monitoring responsibilities, analysis procedures, and escalation processes. Implementing a structured logging and monitoring program enhances operational visibility, reduces time to detect incidents, ensures regulatory compliance, strengthens operational resilience, and maintains stakeholder confidence. Proactive governance, policies, collection standards, analysis, alerting, metrics, and continuous improvement ensure logging and monitoring programs evolve with enterprise objectives, emerging threats, and operational requirements, transforming them into strategic capabilities supporting long-term security, operational integrity, and enterprise resilience.