Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 14 Q196-210

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 196:

You need to ensure secure, low-latency connectivity between VNets in multiple Azure regions to support a multi-tier application, while avoiding public internet exposure. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows private, direct connectivity between Azure VNets across regions via Microsoft’s backbone network. This approach ensures high-throughput, low-latency communication, essential for multi-tier applications where each tier is hosted in separate VNets across regions. Traffic remains entirely within Azure’s secure infrastructure, avoiding public internet exposure and reducing the risk of external threats. Global VNet Peering eliminates the need for VPN tunnels or complex manual route configuration, simplifying operations while maintaining performance and security.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the public internet. While secure, VPN Gateway is subject to latency variability, bandwidth limitations, and external network dependencies, making it less suitable for enterprise-scale multi-region connectivity. VPN Gateway requires ongoing management, monitoring, and potentially multiple tunnels for multi-VNet communication, increasing operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, primarily serves private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Using ExpressRoute solely for VNet-to-VNet communication is cost-prohibitive and operationally unnecessary. ExpressRoute introduces additional complexity when deployed without an on-premises integration requirement.

Option D, NSGs, provides traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level but does not establish connectivity between VNets. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering for granular access control but cannot replace connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, predictable, high-performance inter-VNet communication across regions. It supports multi-region, hub-and-spoke, and disaster recovery architectures while reducing operational complexity. Combined with NSGs, organizations can enforce granular access controls without compromising connectivity, achieving enterprise-level security, scalability, and reliability. Global VNet Peering enables seamless, private, high-bandwidth connectivity between Azure virtual networks across different regions using Microsoft’s secure backbone infrastructure. This capability removes the reliance on public internet paths, eliminating exposure to external threats and ensuring traffic remains protected within Azure’s controlled environment. By avoiding the unpredictability of the public internet, organizations benefit from consistent latency, reliable throughput, and performance suitable for enterprise-grade workloads. Multi-tier applications distributed across regions—such as those separating web, application, and data layers—rely heavily on predictable inter-VNet communication. Global VNet Peering ensures this by providing near–real-time connectivity without requiring additional appliances, encryption overhead, or dependency on intermediate gateways.

One of the strongest advantages of Global VNet Peering lies in its architectural simplicity. Because peerings are configured directly between VNets, there is no need for managing tunnels, handling failover configurations, or administering complex routing tables. Azure automatically propagates routes between peered VNets, ensuring traffic flows efficiently without administrative intervention. This reduces misconfiguration risks, operational overhead, and time spent maintaining network infrastructure. For growing environments where VNets increase over time—especially in hub-and-spoke, multi-region, or DR-focused architectures—this simplification becomes a strategic benefit. Network engineers can deploy and scale environments faster while maintaining consistency across regions.

Global VNet Peering is also highly scalable, supporting large volumes of inter-VNet traffic without traditional VPN bandwidth constraints. Because the traffic travels through Microsoft’s global network, capacity scales with Azure rather than being limited by physical tunnel throughput. This enables scenarios such as high-volume replication between databases, distributed microservices architectures, and cross-region failover strategies. Furthermore, traffic between peered VNets is transmitted using Azure’s optimized backbone routing, which prioritizes performance and resiliency. This makes it possible for organizations to build globally distributed applications that require fast synchronization between components located in different regions.

Another advantage of Global VNet Peering is its full compatibility with Azure-native security tools. While Global VNet Peering itself does not enforce security policies, it works alongside network security groups, firewalls, and routing configurations to provide a layered security posture. Organizations can apply granular access restrictions using NSGs at subnet or NIC levels without interrupting peering traffic. This allows security teams to maintain least-privilege access while ensuring the VNets remain connected. For example, even though two VNets are peered, an organization can restrict specific subnets from communicating, ensuring isolation where required and access where justified. This balance of flexibility and security is critical for adhering to industry compliance standards.

Global VNet Peering is particularly important for architectures designed for high availability and disaster recovery. Many enterprises deploy workloads in multiple Azure regions to ensure continuity in case of regional outages. Global VNet Peering ensures that backup servers, replicated databases, or mirrored applications can synchronize efficiently and securely. Because it avoids public internet dependency, the risk of performance degradation during regional failover events is minimized. Organizations can achieve faster recovery times, more predictable replication windows, and an overall more resilient cloud footprint.

In contrast, Option B, VPN Gateway, relies on the public internet for communication. Although it encrypts traffic to maintain security, it cannot guarantee the same level of consistency, performance, or low latency as Azure’s private backbone. VPN Gateways also require ongoing management, such as tunnel renewal, throughput planning, and performance monitoring. They often introduce complexity when dealing with multi-VNet or multi-region environments because multiple tunnels may be needed to maintain full connectivity. This increases operational effort and can introduce bottlenecks in high-volume scenarios. For organizations requiring stable, high-speed communication across regions, this approach is insufficient.

Option C, ExpressRoute, serves a different purpose—namely, private connectivity between on-premises infrastructure and Azure. While it supports VNet-to-VNet communication through private peering, implementing ExpressRoute solely for Azure-to-Azure communication is unnecessary and expensive. ExpressRoute circuits require provisioning, management, and possible involvement of service providers. Without an on-premises connectivity requirement, the overhead outweighs the benefits. Organizations can achieve the same or better Azure-to-Azure performance simply by using Global VNet Peering, avoiding the added cost and complexity of ExpressRoute circuits.

Option D, NSGs, are essential for controlling inbound and outbound network traffic at different levels, but they do not create connectivity between VNets. They serve as security constructs that filter traffic rather than facilitate it. NSGs should be used in conjunction with Global VNet Peering to provide security boundaries while maintaining seamless connectivity. This combination ensures that organizations maintain compliance, enforce policies, and secure communication streams without disrupting cross-VNet functionality.

By adopting Global VNet Peering, organizations establish a foundation for scalable, secure, and efficient cloud networking. It supports modern architectural patterns, enhances application performance across distributed environments, and reduces operational burden. Whether expanding into new regions, creating multi-tier applications, or enabling failover capabilities, Global VNet Peering ensures Azure VNets remain connected most optimally and securely as possible.

Question 197:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence across multiple VNets, ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service that enables centralized inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets. Administrators can define network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence to block known malicious traffic, and generate logs for auditing and compliance. Azure Firewall automatically scales to handle traffic spikes and ensures high availability, providing continuous policy enforcement across VNets without operational intervention.

Option B, NSGs, provide traffic filtering at subnet or NIC levels but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. They complement Azure Firewall by providing granular access control, but lack application-level inspection and automatic scaling.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 but does not inspect or enforce security policies. It is unsuitable for centralized outbound traffic inspection or threat intelligence enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities but inspects only HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot provide enterprise-wide inspection of all outbound traffic or integrate with threat intelligence.

Deploying Azure Firewall enables enterprises to maintain consistent security policies across multiple VNets, detect and block threats proactively, and achieve compliance with regulatory requirements. It reduces operational complexity by centralizing inspection, logging, and monitoring, and automatic scaling ensures uninterrupted enforcement during traffic spikes. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures and multi-region deployments, providing enterprise-grade security, operational efficiency, and high availability. Azure Firewall delivers a unified, enterprise-grade security layer that protects resources across multiple Azure virtual networks by providing centralized, stateful traffic inspection. It allows organizations to create and enforce consistent security policies regardless of the number of VNets, regions, or workloads involved. Because it operates as a cloud-native, fully managed service, Azure Firewall eliminates the manual overhead associated with deploying and maintaining traditional firewall appliances. Administrators can define both network rules and application rules, enabling precise control over which protocols, ports, and URLs are allowed. By supporting application-level filtering, Azure Firewall enables organizations to inspect outbound traffic more deeply, blocking undesirable destinations and ensuring that users and workloads communicate only with approved endpoints.

One of the most significant advantages of Azure Firewall is its built-in integration with threat intelligence feeds. This capability allows the firewall to automatically detect and block traffic from known malicious IP addresses and domains. As threats evolve, the threat intelligence engine continuously updates, ensuring that the firewall remains effective against emerging risks. This proactive security approach provides a layer of protection not present in basic filtering tools, helping organizations respond swiftly to threats without manual rule updates. In highly regulated environments where continuous monitoring and threat prevention are essential, this automated intelligence dramatically strengthens the security posture.

Azure Firewall also provides extensive logging and monitoring capabilities through its integration with Azure Monitor and Log Analytics. All traffic logs, rule matches, and threat detections can be exported for compliance reporting, anomaly detection, and security investigations. Centralized logging allows security teams to gain full visibility across distributed applications and networks, enabling faster detection of unusual traffic patterns or potential breaches. Organizations can build dashboards, set up automated alerts, and integrate logs with SIEM solutions to establish comprehensive security operations. This level of observability is critical for meeting compliance requirements and ensuring that network activities are auditable.

Another core benefit is its automatic scalability. Unlike traditional firewalls that require manual scaling or hardware upgrades to support increased load, Azure Firewall adapts to traffic volume without administrator involvement. This means that sudden spikes—such as seasonal traffic, failover events, or high-throughput workloads—will not overwhelm the firewall or introduce a performance bottleneck. The firewall remains available and responsive even during peak usage, ensuring uninterrupted security enforcement. This elasticity is particularly valuable in cloud environments where workloads frequently grow, shrink, or shift across regions.

Azure Firewall is also designed to support hub-and-spoke network architectures. In this model, the firewall is deployed in a central hub VNet, and all spoke VNets route their traffic through it for inspection. This approach simplifies security management by allowing a single firewall instance to protect multiple spokes. It removes the need to deploy separate firewalls in every VNet or region, significantly reducing operational complexity and cost. Additionally, Azure Firewall supports forced tunneling, allowing outbound traffic to be routed through a central inspection point before reaching external destinations. This ensures that all egress traffic adheres to enterprise security policies.

In multi-region deployments, Azure Firewall provides consistent protection by allowing administrators to replicate rule collections, policies, and configurations across regions. This ensures that applications deployed globally receive the same level of security enforcement, reducing the risk of configuration drift or regional policy gaps. Consistency across regions is essential for organizations with distributed applications, global customer bases, or multi-region redundancy strategies.

In contrast, Option B, NSGs, provide essential filtering capabilities but do not offer centralized policy enforcement or application-level inspection. NSGs operate at layer 3 and layer 4, making them suitable for controlling basic inbound and outbound traffic for subnets or NICs. However, they cannot analyze the content of traffic, identify malicious patterns, or integrate with threat intelligence feeds. NSGs also lack centralized management for multiple VNets, making large-scale policy enforcement more challenging. Although they remain an important part of network security, NSGs function best as a complementary layer rather than a replacement for a full firewall service.

Option C, the Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at the transport layer but provides no security inspection capabilities. It does not block malicious traffic, enforce organizational policies, or analyze traffic content. Its purpose is performance-related traffic distribution, not security enforcement. Therefore, it is unsuitable for scenarios requiring centralized outbound traffic inspection or deep packet analysis.

Option D, Application Gateway, includes a web application firewall (WAF) that protects against common web vulnerabilities, but it focuses exclusively on HTTP and HTTPS traffic. It cannot inspect non-web protocols or provide comprehensive outbound inspection across all workloads. Application Gateway is useful for web-facing applications, but it cannot meet broader enterprise requirements for end-to-end security coverage across entire networks.

By deploying Azure Firewall, organizations establish a secure, scalable, and centrally managed layer of protection that spans multiple VNets and regions. It strengthens security by integrating threat intelligence, deep packet inspection, and automated scaling. At the same time, it streamlines operations by reducing the number of disparate security tools and policies administrators must maintain. Through its robust monitoring, logging, and management capabilities, Azure Firewall helps organizations maintain compliance, reduce operational risk, and ensure that all network traffic—regardless of source or destination—is thoroughly inspected and controlled. This combination of capabilities provides the reliability, visibility, and protection required for enterprise cloud environments operating at scale.

Question 198:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across multiple VNets while integrating network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual route configuration, reduces operational errors, and ensures consistent routing across enterprise networks. Integrating NVAs allows centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, ensuring compliance and security across VNets. Route Server supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures, allowing enterprises to simplify routing and enforce security policies efficiently.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP for dynamic routing but does not directly integrate NVAs. Multi-VNet routing using VPN Gateway requires manual configuration and monitoring, increasing operational overhead and error potential.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets but does not automate route propagation or integrate with NVAs. Manual route management is required, increasing complexity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or centralize inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but cannot replace its routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable route propagation while integrating NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises achieve operational efficiency, scalable management, and high availability. Route Server supports hybrid, multi-region, and hub-and-spoke architectures, providing consistent, secure, and predictable routing. Monitoring route propagation, detecting anomalies, and enforcing compliance are simplified, aligning with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable network operations. Azure Route Server provides dynamic, automated route propagation using BGP, ensuring that routing updates flow seamlessly between Azure VNets, network virtual appliances, and on-premises routers without requiring administrators to manually configure or maintain custom route tables. This automation is especially valuable in large, complex network environments where multiple spokes, regions, or hybrid connections must exchange routing information accurately and consistently. By handling route advertisements automatically, Azure Route Server significantly reduces the risk of misconfigurations—one of the most common causes of connectivity failures in enterprise networks. In dynamic environments where routes frequently change due to scaling, adding new VNets, or deploying NVAs, the Route Server ensures that network paths remain up-to-date without manual intervention.

Another key advantage of Azure Route Server is its seamless integration with NVAs, which allows organizations to implement advanced traffic inspection and security policies in a centralized manner. By using BGP peering between NVAs and the Route Server, enterprises can direct traffic flows through these inspection points without requiring complex or error-prone UDR configurations. This integration ensures that all relevant traffic—whether lateral between VNets, north-south, or outbound—passes through the designated NVAs for inspection. This approach not only simplifies security operations but also supports architectural consistency across environments such as hub-and-spoke, hybrid cloud, and multi-region deployments. Enterprises can ensure that workloads follow the same enforcement mechanisms regardless of where they reside.

Azure Route Server also enhances network resiliency by supporting multiple BGP sessions and active-active NVA deployments. This redundancy enables continuous availability and route propagation even in the event of appliance failures or regional disruptions. Combined with Azure’s highly available networking backbone, Route Server provides a stable and predictable routing platform that supports enterprise-grade uptime requirements. In hybrid environments, it allows on-premises routers to exchange routes dynamically with Azure infrastructure, enabling more resilient connectivity and reducing dependency on static route updates. As organizations expand their cloud footprint, this hybrid flexibility ensures that on-premises and cloud networks stay synchronized.

Operational efficiency is further improved through the Route Server’s ability to simplify troubleshooting and monitoring. Administrators gain better visibility into route exchanges, BGP session states, and propagation behaviors. Detecting routing anomalies or misaligned policies becomes easier because the Route Server centralizes route propagation rather than spreading route logic across multiple VNets or appliances. This consolidation enables faster root cause analysis and reduces mean time to resolution for network issues. At the same time, automated propagation ensures route consistency across all connected networks, which helps avoid asymmetric routing or unintended traffic paths.

In contrast, Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP but does not integrate NVAs or automate inter-VNet routing. Administrators must manually configure UDRs and routing rules for each VNet, which increases complexity and creates room for misconfiguration. VPN Gateways are also more suited for encrypted connectivity over the public internet rather than large-scale internal routing automation.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides excellent private connectivity for hybrid networks but lacks dynamic automation for Azure-to-Azure routing and does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Route management remains manual, adding overhead for enterprises seeking simplified cloud routing.

Option D, NSGs, enforce security rules but are not routing tools and therefore cannot propagate routes or coordinate with NVAs at the routing level. NSGs are essential for access control, but cannot perform the dynamic automation or hybrid integration that Route Server provides.

By deploying Azure Route Server, enterprises achieve a routing architecture that is automated, scalable, and deeply integrated with security infrastructure. It removes repetitive administrative tasks, enhances operational reliability, and supports modern cloud architectures that require flexible, dynamic routing behavior. This leads to a more predictable and secure network environment, allowing organizations to focus on application delivery and optimization rather than trying to maintain complex routing logic manually.

Question 199:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets to support enterprise workloads requiring predictable performance and reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which are critical for enterprise workloads like mission-critical databases, analytics pipelines, and financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability and operational simplicity.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity. While secure, it is subject to variable latency, limited bandwidth, and public internet dependencies, making it less suitable for high-performance workloads.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs. It does not provide high-throughput or low-latency connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. They complement ExpressRoute but cannot replace high-performance private connectivity.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity for critical workloads. By bypassing the public internet, organizations gain enhanced security, operational reliability, and consistent performance. ExpressRoute integrates with monitoring and analytics tools for proactive performance management, capacity planning, and operational oversight. It supports multi-VNet communication, disaster recovery, and hybrid cloud workloads, ensuring operational efficiency, predictable performance, and enterprise-grade security in alignment with best practices for hybrid cloud networking.ExpressRoute delivers the level of reliability and consistency that enterprise hybrid environments require, especially when workloads depend on stable, high-throughput connectivity between on-premises datacenters and Azure VNets. Because ExpressRoute traffic flows through Microsoft’s private backbone rather than the public internet, organizations benefit from enhanced security, deterministic routing, and protection against common internet-based risks such as congestion, packet loss, and fluctuating performance. This is especially important for use cases involving latency-sensitive applications, continuous data replication, or cross-environment workloads that must maintain strict performance baselines.

In addition to predictable performance, ExpressRoute offers flexible bandwidth options and the ability to scale as organizational needs evolve. Enterprises can choose circuit sizes aligned with their workload demands, and upgrades can be performed with minimal disruption. This scalability makes it easier to meet new performance requirements as applications grow or as hybrid architectures expand to additional regions. ExpressRoute also integrates seamlessly with redundant circuit designs, enabling high availability and failover strategies that reduce the risk of connectivity outages.

Because ExpressRoute supports private peering, Microsoft peering, and ExpressRoute Direct, it enables robust connectivity models for multi-region architectures, global operations, and disaster recovery plans. Organizations can maintain consistent routing policies, centralize operational management, and simplify workload migrations without rearchitecting their connectivity foundation. This combination of performance, security, and operational resilience makes ExpressRoute the preferred option for enterprises seeking dependable hybrid connectivity aligned with long-term cloud adoption strategies.

Question 200:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and support disaster recovery. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports routing methods including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic during failures, ensuring high availability, latency optimization, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities at the regional level, but cannot perform global DNS-based routing or health-based failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 within a region. It cannot provide global routing, latency optimization, or disaster recovery functionality.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are directed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving application responsiveness. It enhances global availability, disaster recovery, and operational monitoring. Traffic Manager supports enterprise best practices for globally distributed applications, providing intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover. This ensures resilient, high-performing, and scalable global applications with operational continuity and optimal user experience.

Question 201:

You need to provide secure, low-latency connectivity between multiple VNets across different Azure regions for a distributed application. The traffic must remain within Microsoft’s backbone network. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows private connectivity between VNets across different Azure regions via Microsoft’s backbone network. It ensures low-latency, high-throughput communication between application tiers, keeping traffic completely within Azure’s secure infrastructure. This is critical for multi-tier applications where web, application, and database layers are hosted in separate VNets. Global VNet Peering eliminates the need for VPN tunnels or complex manual route configuration, simplifying network operations and improving reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity. While secure, it is subject to latency variability, bandwidth limitations, and dependency on external network reliability, making it less ideal for high-performance, multi-region communication.

Option C, ExpressRoute, primarily provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. Using it solely for VNet-to-VNet communication introduces unnecessary operational overhead and cost.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC levels but do not provide connectivity. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering for access control but cannot replace the network link itself.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, reliable, and high-performance inter-VNet communication across regions. It supports hub-and-spoke, multi-region, and disaster recovery architectures, reducing operational complexity while providing granular access control when combined with NSGs.

Question 202:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence across multiple VNets. The solution must scale automatically and maintain high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall that centralizes policy enforcement and traffic inspection across multiple VNets. Administrators can define application and network rules, integrate threat intelligence to block known malicious traffic, and generate logs for auditing and compliance. Automatic scaling allows the firewall to handle traffic spikes without manual intervention, while high availability ensures continuous protection even during failures.

Option B, NSGs, are essential for traffic segmentation but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. They complement Azure Firewall but lack automated scaling, application-level inspection, and enterprise-wide policy enforcement.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 but does not provide inspection or policy enforcement capabilities.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF for HTTP/HTTPS traffic, but cannot enforce centralized security across all outbound traffic or integrate threat intelligence.

Deploying Azure Firewall ensures enterprises can maintain consistent security policies, proactively block threats, achieve compliance, and reduce operational complexity. Automatic scaling and high availability allow continuous enforcement across VNets, supporting hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures. It aligns with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable, and efficient cloud networking.

Question 203:

You need to propagate routes dynamically across VNets and integrate network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection. Manual route configuration should be minimized. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This removes the need for manual route management, reduces configuration errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex networks. NVAs integrated with Route Server provide centralized inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across VNets. Route Server supports multi-region and hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling scalable, reliable routing for enterprise networks.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Manual configuration and monitoring are required for multi-VNet scenarios, increasing operational overhead.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private on-premises-to-Azure connectivity but does not automate route propagation or integrate NVAs. Manual route configuration adds complexity and risk.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or provide centralized inspection. They complement the Route Server but cannot replace it.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable routing with integrated NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises gain operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. It reduces errors, supports hybrid and multi-region architectures, and aligns with best practices for secure, scalable cloud network design.

Question 204:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets for enterprise workloads requiring predictable performance. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute delivers dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This guarantees predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is essential for critical workloads like databases, analytics pipelines, and financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the internet. While secure, it suffers from variable latency, bandwidth constraints, and dependency on public networks, making it less suitable for high-performance enterprise workloads.

Option C, Azure Bastion, allows secure VM management without public IP exposure but does not deliver high-throughput, low-latency connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, provides traffic filtering but does not guarantee connectivity or performance. They complement ExpressRoute but cannot replace it.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises and Azure VNets. Bypassing the internet enhances reliability, security, and operational efficiency. Integration with monitoring and analytics tools enables performance tracking and capacity planning. ExpressRoute supports hybrid and multi-VNet architectures, disaster recovery, and operational efficiency, aligning with best practices for enterprise-grade hybrid cloud connectivity.

Question 205:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic in case of failure, ensuring high availability, disaster recovery, and optimized performance.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF functionality but operates regionally. It cannot perform global DNS-based routing or health-based failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 within a region. It cannot manage global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery functionality.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global availability, supports disaster recovery, and provides operational monitoring for globally distributed applications. Enterprises benefit from scalable, resilient, high-performing global application delivery while maintaining operational continuity and optimal user experience, following best practices for globally distributed architecture.

Question 206:

You need to establish private, low-latency, high-throughput connectivity between VNets across multiple Azure regions for a global multi-tier application, ensuring that traffic does not traverse the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering provides private connectivity between VNets in different Azure regions through Microsoft’s backbone network. This solution ensures that traffic remains fully isolated from the public internet, reducing security risks and enhancing network performance. It supports low-latency, high-throughput communication, which is essential for global multi-tier applications where different VNets host web, application, and database tiers.

Option B, VPN Gateway, offers encrypted connectivity over the public internet. Although it provides secure communication, it is prone to variability in latency and bandwidth due to reliance on internet routing. This variability can impact performance-critical workloads and requires ongoing tunnel management and monitoring. VPN Gateway is also operationally more complex for multi-region deployments, as each VNet pair may require separate configurations and route management.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is primarily intended for private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. While ExpressRoute offers excellent performance and security, it is overkill for inter-VNet communication across regions and introduces unnecessary operational complexity and costs.

Option D, NSGs, are used to filter traffic at the subnet or NIC level but do not provide connectivity. They are essential for access control and complement Global VNet Peering, but cannot substitute for the connectivity itself.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures reliable, secure, and high-performance inter-VNet connectivity across regions. It supports multi-region, hub-and-spoke, and disaster recovery architectures, providing operational simplicity. Combined with NSGs for granular access control, enterprises achieve a secure, scalable, and high-performing network infrastructure aligned with global best practices.

Question 207:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets, integrating threat intelligence and ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service that centralizes traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets. Administrators can define application and network rules, integrate threat intelligence to block known malicious traffic, and monitor logs for auditing and compliance purposes. Azure Firewall automatically scales to accommodate traffic spikes and provides high availability to maintain uninterrupted security enforcement.

Option B, NSGs, provides traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. NSGs complement Azure Firewall by providing granular access control, but they cannot inspect all outbound traffic at an application level or enforce enterprise-wide security policies.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes layer 4 traffic without inspecting content or enforcing security policies. It cannot integrate threat intelligence or provide centralized policy enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities, but it only inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot enforce enterprise-wide security policies for all outbound traffic or provide automated scaling across multiple VNets.

Deploying Azure Firewall enables enterprises to maintain consistent security policies, block threats proactively, ensure regulatory compliance, and reduce operational complexity. Its integration with threat intelligence provides advanced protection against emerging threats. Automatic scaling ensures continuous enforcement during traffic spikes, while high availability guarantees uninterrupted policy enforcement. Azure Firewall aligns with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable, and highly available cloud networking architectures.

Question 208:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across VNets while integrating network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement. You want to minimize manual route management. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This automation reduces manual configuration, prevents errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex enterprise networks. NVAs integrated with Route Server provide centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, supporting security and compliance objectives. Route Server facilitates hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures, enabling scalable, reliable routing with minimal operational overhead.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet routing via VPN Gateway requires manual configuration, monitoring, and maintenance, increasing operational complexity and potential for misconfiguration.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private on-premises-to-Azure connectivity but does not automate route propagation or integrate NVAs. Manual route management would be required, increasing administrative overhead and operational risk.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or centralize inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server by enforcing access policies, but cannot replace routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable route propagation while integrating NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises gain operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. It reduces configuration errors, supports hybrid and multi-region deployments, and aligns with best practices for secure, scalable, and maintainable cloud network architectures.

Question 209:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets for workloads requiring predictable performance and operational reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which are critical for mission-critical workloads such as financial systems, databases, and analytics pipelines. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the public internet. While secure, it is subject to latency and bandwidth variability, limiting its suitability for performance-sensitive enterprise workloads. VPN Gateway also requires additional management for multi-VNet and multi-region deployments.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs, but does not provide high-throughput or low-latency connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or performance guarantees. They are complementary to ExpressRoute but cannot substitute for high-performance private connectivity.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. By bypassing the public internet, enterprises gain improved security, operational reliability, and consistent performance. ExpressRoute integrates with monitoring tools for performance tracking and capacity planning. It supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and hybrid workloads, aligning with enterprise best practices for hybrid cloud networking.

Question 210:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the closest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic in case of failures, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF functionality within a region. It cannot perform global DNS-based routing, health-based failover across regions, or geographic traffic distribution.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 regionally. It cannot manage global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery functionality.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are routed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving application responsiveness. It enhances global availability, supports disaster recovery, and provides operational monitoring for distributed applications. Enterprises benefit from scalable, resilient, and high-performing global application delivery, maintaining operational continuity and optimal user experience, aligned with best practices for globally distributed architecture.

Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 14 Q196-210

Related posts: