ISC CISSP Certified Information Systems Security Professional Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 14 Q196-210
Visit here for our full ISC CISSP exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 196:
Which security principle ensures users receive the minimum privileges necessary to perform their duties?
A) Defense in Depth
B) Least Privilege
C) Separation of Duties
D) Need-to-Know
Answer: B
Explanation:
Defense in Depth is a strategy that implements multiple layers of security controls to protect systems and data. It relies on a combination of physical, technical, and administrative measures to reduce the risk of breaches. While it strengthens the overall security posture, it does not prescribe the specific amount of access a user should have. Separation of Duties is a principle that divides responsibilities among multiple individuals to reduce the risk of fraud or errors, particularly in financial or administrative operations. It ensures that no single person can complete sensitive processes entirely alone, but does not dictate precise access levels. Need-to-Know limits access to information only to those who require it for a specific task or project. While this controls information exposure, it does not cover all privileges a user might have across systems, processes, or applications.
Least Privilege, on the other hand, is the principle that focuses on granting users, processes, or systems the minimum necessary rights to perform their assigned functions. By restricting access in this way, organizations can dramatically reduce the attack surface available to malicious actors. If a user account is compromised, the damage potential is minimized because that account does not have permissions beyond what is required for legitimate activities. This principle is not limited to human users; it also applies to service accounts, automated processes, network devices, and software components. Implementing least privilege requires a comprehensive understanding of roles, responsibilities, and access needs. Organizations often conduct detailed access audits, role-based access control mapping, and periodic reviews to ensure that privileges remain aligned with current responsibilities.
Practical application of least privilege involves carefully defining roles and permissions, automating access control where possible, and continuously monitoring access patterns for anomalies. In enterprise environments, tools such as Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems, privileged access management solutions, and audit logging play a critical role in enforcing least privilege policies. Beyond security, adhering to this principle also supports regulatory compliance, as standards like ISO 27001, NIST, GDPR, and HIPAA emphasize limiting access to sensitive information. Least privilege is particularly effective in preventing privilege escalation attacks, where an attacker gains elevated rights by exploiting over-permissioned accounts. It also mitigates accidental data leaks, reduces potential insider threats, and improves overall system resilience.
In addition, least privilege encourages the use of just-in-time access, where users receive temporary permissions for specific tasks and lose them once the task is complete. This reduces standing privileges that could be exploited over time. For example, a system administrator may be granted temporary elevated access to deploy updates, but operates under standard user permissions otherwise. Across operating systems, least privilege manifests through user account controls, file permissions, process restrictions, and network access controls. In cloud environments, this principle is implemented through policies and service-specific roles that limit what actions can be performed.
By ensuring that users operate only with the privileges necessary for their duties, least privilege fosters security awareness, operational discipline, and accountability. It supports the creation of audit trails, reduces the impact of security breaches, and aligns with best practices in secure system design. For these reasons, the correct answer is Least Privilege.
Question 197:
Which encryption method uses a single key for both encryption and decryption?
A) Asymmetric Encryption
B) Symmetric Encryption
C) Hashing
D) Digital Signature
Answer: B
Explanation:
Asymmetric encryption, also known as public-key cryptography, uses a key pair consisting of a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption. This enables secure communication without prior key exchange but requires more computational resources. Hashing is a one-way process that converts input data into a fixed-length digest. It is irreversible and cannot be used to retrieve the original data, meaning it cannot provide encryption for confidentiality. Digital signatures authenticate the sender and ensure message integrity, but do not encrypt the message content for confidentiality.
Symmetric encryption, in contrast, uses a single secret key shared between the sender and receiver for both encryption and decryption. Algorithms such as AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), DES (Data Encryption Standard), and 3DES (Triple DES) are widely used examples. Symmetric encryption is highly efficient, making it suitable for encrypting large volumes of data, including files, databases, communication channels, and storage systems. Due to its speed and lower computational overhead, it is commonly used in scenarios requiring bulk data encryption.
The primary challenge with symmetric encryption is secure key management. Both parties must securely exchange the secret key before encrypted communication can take place. If the key is intercepted or leaked, an attacker can decrypt all communication or data encrypted with that key. This is why symmetric encryption is often combined with asymmetric encryption in hybrid cryptosystems: asymmetric encryption securely exchanges the symmetric key, after which the faster symmetric algorithm encrypts the data itself.
Symmetric encryption also supports different modes of operation, such as CBC (Cipher Block Chaining), GCM (Galois/Counter Mode), and CTR (Counter Mode), each providing specific security properties like confidentiality, integrity verification, and resistance to certain attack vectors. It is used in a variety of contexts, including Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), secure file storage, encrypted messaging apps, and financial systems. Proper implementation ensures that encryption keys are rotated regularly, protected from unauthorized access, and stored securely to prevent compromise.
Given its reliance on a single key for both encrypting and decrypting information, symmetric encryption is distinguished from asymmetric methods, which require two separate keys. This fundamental difference has significant implications for performance, key management, and use cases. Because symmetric encryption uses a single secret key, it is computationally efficient and can handle large volumes of data quickly, making it ideal for encrypting files, databases, network communications, and entire storage systems. In contrast, asymmetric encryption, while providing enhanced key distribution and non-repudiation features, is more resource-intensive and slower, which limits its practicality for bulk data encryption.
Symmetric encryption algorithms include widely used standards such as Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), Data Encryption Standard (DES), Triple DES (3DES), and Blowfish. AES, in particular, has become the global standard for data encryption due to its combination of security, performance, and flexibility, supporting key lengths of 128, 192, and 256 bits. DES and 3DES, while older, are still found in legacy systems and highlight the evolution of encryption methods over time. Symmetric encryption can operate in various modes, such as Cipher Block Chaining (CBC), Galois/Counter Mode (GCM), and Counter (CTR) mode, each offering different security properties like data integrity verification, parallel processing support, and resistance to specific attack vectors.
A critical aspect of symmetric encryption is key management. Both the sender and receiver must securely exchange and store the secret key, as compromise of the key allows an attacker to decrypt all encrypted data. This requirement has led to the adoption of hybrid cryptosystems, where asymmetric encryption is used to securely exchange the symmetric key, after which the symmetric algorithm encrypts the bulk data efficiently. This combination leverages the strengths of both methods: the secure key distribution of asymmetric encryption and the speed and efficiency of symmetric encryption.
Symmetric encryption is foundational in a wide variety of cybersecurity applications. It is used in securing communications via protocols such as TLS/SSL, in protecting sensitive data at rest within databases and file systems, and in encrypted storage devices and VPNs. Its efficiency and versatility make it suitable for both enterprise-scale systems and consumer applications, including messaging apps, cloud storage, and secure financial transactions.
Additionally, symmetric encryption is often combined with integrity verification mechanisms such as message authentication codes (MACs) or hash-based authentication to ensure that the data has not been tampered with during transmission or storage. This pairing further strengthens security while maintaining the inherent efficiency of symmetric algorithms.
Therefore, symmetric encryption’s efficiency, versatility, and widespread adoption in cybersecurity make it a foundational tool for protecting data confidentiality. Its reliance on a single key for both encryption and decryption, combined with its high performance and adaptability, distinguishes it from asymmetric methods and ensures its central role in securing digital information. The correct answer is Symmetric Encryption.
Question 198:
Which network security device inspects incoming and outgoing packets to enforce security policies?
A) Router
B) Firewall
C) Switch
D) Load Balancer
Answer: B
Explanation:
Routers are primarily responsible for forwarding packets between networks using IP addresses and routing tables. While they can implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) to block certain traffic, routers are not designed to perform comprehensive packet inspection or enforce detailed security policies. Switches operate at Layer 2 of the OSI model and manage local network traffic by directing frames between devices. Although modern switches may include VLANs and basic security features, they do not perform in-depth inspection of traffic content. Load balancers are used to distribute network or application traffic across multiple servers to enhance performance and availability; they do not enforce security rules on packet content.
Firewalls, however, are specifically designed to inspect network traffic and enforce security policies. They operate at various layers, including packet level (stateless filtering), session level (stateful inspection), and application level (deep packet inspection). Firewalls can enforce rules based on IP addresses, protocols, ports, and application-specific signatures. Modern firewalls, often referred to as Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW), include features such as intrusion prevention systems (IPS), malware detection, application awareness, and identity-based access control.
Firewalls play a central role in network defense, forming the first line of perimeter security. Proper configuration is critical to avoid leaving gaps that attackers could exploit. Security policies must define allowed and denied traffic, logging requirements, and monitoring procedures. Firewalls also support segmentation of networks to isolate sensitive systems from general user networks, reducing the risk of lateral movement by attackers.
Deployment scenarios include network-based firewalls at the perimeter, host-based firewalls on individual devices, and cloud-based firewalls protecting virtualized resources. Network-based firewalls typically sit at the boundary between an organization’s internal network and the external internet, filtering traffic according to defined policies to prevent unauthorized access. Host-based firewalls, in contrast, operate on individual devices such as servers, laptops, or workstations, providing an additional layer of protection by monitoring inbound and outbound traffic specific to that device. Cloud-based firewalls protect resources in virtualized and cloud environments, enforcing security policies across dynamic and scalable infrastructures where traditional network boundaries may be less defined.
Firewalls are often integrated with intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) solutions to provide comprehensive visibility and response capabilities. IDS tools analyze network traffic for known attack patterns or anomalous behavior, while SIEM systems collect, correlate, and analyze logs from multiple security devices, including firewalls, to provide centralized monitoring and alerting. This integration allows organizations to detect and respond to threats in near real-time, facilitating proactive security management and incident response. Modern firewalls also include advanced features such as deep packet inspection (DPI), application awareness, user identification, and threat intelligence feeds, which enhance their ability to block sophisticated attacks while allowing legitimate traffic to flow.
By inspecting all incoming and outgoing traffic and enforcing organizational security policies, firewalls serve as a critical control point in a defense-in-depth strategy. They help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, reduce the risk of malware propagation, and provide segmentation between different network zones, limiting the potential impact of a breach. Proper configuration and regular updates are essential to ensure that firewalls remain effective against evolving threats, as misconfigured or outdated firewalls can create vulnerabilities that attackers may exploit.
Firewalls also support policy enforcement, allowing organizations to define rules for applications, users, and devices, and to monitor compliance with regulatory or internal standards. They can be configured to allow only specific types of traffic, block malicious connections, and log suspicious activity for further analysis. With cloud adoption and the increasing use of remote work, firewalls have evolved to protect hybrid environments, providing consistent security across on-premises networks, cloud workloads, and remote endpoints.
Therefore, the device that inspects packets and enforces security policies is a Firewall, making it the correct answer. Firewalls are indispensable in modern network security, forming a core component of layered defenses, enabling organizations to control access, maintain compliance, and safeguard critical assets from cyber threats. Their role is fundamental not only in perimeter protection but also in securing internal networks, cloud deployments, and endpoint communications.
Question 199:
Which cloud deployment model is operated solely for a single organization?
A) Public Cloud
B) Private Cloud
C) Community Cloud
D) Hybrid Cloud
Answer: B
Explanation:
Public clouds are shared infrastructures managed by cloud service providers and available to multiple organizations. They provide scalability and cost-effectiveness but limit control over security and compliance. Community clouds are shared among organizations with common objectives, such as industry-specific compliance requirements, and offer more control than public clouds but still involve shared resources. Hybrid clouds combine private and public cloud resources to achieve flexibility and scalability while maintaining security for sensitive workloads.
Private clouds, in contrast, are dedicated to a single organization, either hosted on-premises or by a third-party provider. They provide complete control over infrastructure, security policies, and compliance measures. Organizations can customize resources, manage access controls strictly, and ensure adherence to regulatory requirements. Private clouds are ideal for organizations handling sensitive data, critical applications, or workloads requiring consistent performance and compliance oversight.
Private cloud deployments also support advanced features like virtualized infrastructure, automated provisioning, and scalable resource allocation while maintaining isolation from other organizations. This enables enterprises to benefit from cloud technologies, such as agility and automation, without compromising security. Organizations can implement internal firewalls, encryption, monitoring, and access control measures tailored to their specific needs.
The private cloud model is particularly relevant for industries such as finance, healthcare, government, and defense, where confidentiality, integrity, and regulatory compliance are paramount. These sectors handle highly sensitive data, such as financial records, patient health information, personally identifiable information (PII), and classified government data. A private cloud ensures that only the organization has access to its resources, minimizing exposure to unauthorized users and potential security breaches. By providing a dedicated environment, private clouds allow organizations to implement custom security policies, encryption standards, identity and access management controls, and compliance monitoring tailored to their unique requirements.
One of the key advantages of private clouds is their ability to mitigate risks associated with multi-tenancy in public clouds. In public cloud environments, multiple organizations share the same infrastructure, which can introduce risks such as cross-tenant vulnerabilities, noisy neighbor performance issues, and limited visibility into underlying hardware and network configurations. Private clouds eliminate these concerns by isolating infrastructure for a single organization. This isolation not only strengthens security but also provides predictable performance and resource allocation, which is critical for applications with high availability, low latency, or intensive computational requirements.
Private clouds can be hosted on-premises, allowing organizations to retain physical control over servers, storage, and networking equipment. This on-premises deployment enables tighter integration with existing IT systems, internal applications, and legacy databases, creating a seamless operational environment. Alternatively, private clouds can be hosted by a third-party provider in a dedicated infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) setup, allowing organizations to leverage cloud benefits such as scalability and managed services while maintaining exclusive access and control. Many organizations adopt a hybrid cloud strategy by combining private and public cloud resources, using private clouds for sensitive workloads and public clouds for less critical tasks, which provides both security and flexibility.
In addition to security and compliance, private clouds provide operational advantages such as improved resource utilization, automated provisioning, and centralized management of IT assets. Organizations can deploy virtual machines, containers, and storage pools on demand while enforcing strict policies that ensure only authorized users and applications have access. Automation tools and orchestration platforms can streamline workflows, reduce human error, and enable rapid scaling of resources to meet business demands.
From a regulatory perspective, private clouds support adherence to standards such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and FedRAMP, which require stringent controls over data storage, access, and processing. By having a dedicated cloud environment, organizations can demonstrate compliance through audits, logging, and reporting, which would be more challenging in shared public cloud infrastructures. This ability to maintain accountability and traceability of all activities reinforces trust with customers, partners, and regulators.
Therefore, the cloud model exclusively operated for one organization is the Private Cloud, making it the correct answer. It combines security, compliance, performance, and control, allowing organizations to meet operational, regulatory, and strategic objectives while benefiting from cloud-based scalability and efficiency. Private clouds provide a secure, dedicated environment that addresses the challenges of sensitive workloads, offering organizations confidence in their ability to protect data and maintain business continuity.
Question 200:
Which cryptographic technique ensures message integrity and authenticity but not confidentiality?
A) Encryption
B) Digital Signature
C) Symmetric Key
D) VPN
Answer: B
Explanation:
Encryption ensures that data remains confidential by transforming plaintext into unreadable ciphertext. Symmetric key encryption is a type of encryption using a single key, while VPNs protect data in transit by encrypting traffic. None of these methods inherently guarantees authenticity or message integrity independently.
Digital signatures, however, use asymmetric cryptography to authenticate the sender and ensure the message has not been altered. A sender generates a signature using their private key, which creates a unique identifier tied to the content of the message. Recipients use the sender’s public key to verify the signature. This process confirms that the message originated from the claimed sender and has not been tampered with during transit. Digital signatures are widely used in email communication, software distribution, legal agreements, and secure authentication protocols.
Although digital signatures confirm authenticity and integrity, they do not encrypt the actual message content, meaning the message remains readable to anyone intercepting it. For confidentiality, digital signatures are often combined with encryption methods, ensuring that messages are both secure and verifiable. Key considerations for digital signatures include protecting private keys, using strong hashing algorithms, and maintaining proper certificate management through public key infrastructure (PKI).
Digital signatures also provide non-repudiation, preventing the sender from denying their involvement, which is critical in legal and financial transactions. The integrity check ensures that even a single bit alteration will invalidate the signature, highlighting its reliability in verifying unmodified content. In modern cybersecurity practices, combining digital signatures with encryption offers a complete solution addressing confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation.
The cryptographic technique that ensures integrity and authenticity without providing confidentiality is a Digital Signature, making it the correct answer.
Question 201:
Which principle of security ensures multiple layers of protection to reduce the chance of a single point of failure?
A) Least Privilege
B) Defense in Depth
C) Separation of Duties
D) Need-to-Know
Answer: B
Explanation:
Least Privilege focuses on granting users or processes only the minimum access necessary to perform their duties, reducing the risk of accidental or malicious misuse, but does not inherently provide multiple layers of protection. Separation of Duties divides responsibilities among multiple individuals to prevent fraud or errors, enhancing accountability but not providing layered security per se. Need-to-Know restricts access to information only to those who require it for their role, primarily controlling information exposure rather than creating layered defenses.
Defense in Depth is a comprehensive security strategy that incorporates multiple layers of controls, policies, and technologies to protect information systems. Each layer addresses different aspects of security, including physical security, network security, application security, endpoint protection, authentication, access control, and monitoring. By implementing overlapping and complementary measures, Defense in Depth ensures that if one control fails, others continue to provide protection, reducing the likelihood of a catastrophic security breach.
For example, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, antivirus software, multi-factor authentication, network segmentation, and security awareness training all work together in a layered approach. Defense in Depth also encourages redundancy in both technical and administrative controls, addressing potential single points of failure, whether through personnel, processes, or technology.
This principle is critical in modern security because threats evolve rapidly and attackers often exploit multiple vulnerabilities in sequence. By providing multiple defensive layers, organizations can slow down attacks, provide opportunities for detection and response, and reduce overall risk exposure. Defense in Depth also supports regulatory compliance, operational resilience, and risk management frameworks by demonstrating a proactive, structured approach to security.
The principle that explicitly involves multiple overlapping protective layers to mitigate the risk of single points of failure is Defense in Depth, making it the correct answer. It forms the backbone of effective security architectures, ensuring robust protection against both internal and external threats, human error, and system failures.
Question 202:
Which type of attack captures data between two communicating parties to intercept or alter messages?
A) Man-in-the-Middle
B) SQL Injection
C) Phishing
D) Denial-of-Service
Answer: A
Explanation:
SQL Injection targets database queries, attempting to manipulate or retrieve data, but it does not intercept live communication between parties. Phishing deceives users into revealing credentials or personal information, relying on social engineering rather than direct interception of communications. Denial-of-Service attacks aim to overwhelm systems or networks to make them unavailable, rather than eavesdropping or tampering with data.
Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks occur when an attacker secretly intercepts or relays communication between two parties, creating the illusion of direct communication while capturing or altering messages. Attackers can listen to sensitive data, inject malicious content, or impersonate one party to gain unauthorized access. MitM attacks exploit vulnerabilities in network protocols, encryption weaknesses, insecure Wi-Fi networks, or session hijacking opportunities.
Mitigation strategies include using strong encryption protocols (e.g., TLS), certificate validation, secure key exchange, mutual authentication, VPNs, and avoiding untrusted networks. Awareness of common attack vectors, such as unsecured Wi-Fi, phishing that leads to credential compromise, or DNS spoofing, is crucial to prevent MitM attacks.
Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks compromise both confidentiality and integrity by exposing sensitive data or allowing modification of transmitted messages without the knowledge of the communicating parties. These attacks are particularly dangerous because they occur silently, often leaving little evidence of compromise until the consequences are realized. Attackers may position themselves between a client and a server on a network, intercepting login credentials, personal information, financial transactions, or other confidential communications. In some cases, attackers can manipulate messages, injecting malicious commands, altering transaction amounts, or redirecting data to unauthorized destinations, which can lead to significant operational and financial impacts.
Effective detection of MitM attacks requires a combination of technical and procedural measures. Network monitoring tools and intrusion detection systems (IDS) can help identify anomalies in traffic patterns, such as unexpected source or destination IP addresses, unusual protocol usage, or repeated session interruptions. Similarly, monitoring for unexpected certificate changes, such as self-signed certificates replacing trusted certificates, can indicate the presence of a MitM attack. Organizations also employ secure design practices, including end-to-end encryption, certificate pinning, secure key management, and mutual authentication, to ensure that communications remain confidential and unaltered even if intercepted.
MitM attacks exploit weaknesses in network protocols, encryption, or trust models, making them a key focus for cybersecurity professionals. Common scenarios include unsecured Wi-Fi networks, DNS spoofing, ARP poisoning, and HTTPS stripping attacks. Attackers can exploit these weaknesses to redirect traffic through malicious nodes, capture sensitive data, and even impersonate legitimate users or services. Awareness and training for employees are also critical, as attackers may use phishing or social engineering techniques to facilitate MitM scenarios.
The consequences of MitM attacks extend beyond data loss. They can compromise business reputation, violate regulatory compliance, and erode customer trust. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce are particularly vulnerable due to the high value of the data they transmit. MitM attacks underscore the importance of adopting a layered security approach that includes preventive, detective, and corrective controls. For instance, encrypting communications, implementing multi-factor authentication, and regularly auditing network configurations reduce the likelihood and impact of successful attacks.
The attack that specifically intercepts or manipulates messages between two communicating parties is a Man-in-the-Middle, making it the correct answer. Understanding MitM attacks is essential for securing communications, maintaining trust, and protecting sensitive information from unauthorized interception or modification. By combining technical safeguards, monitoring, and user awareness, organizations can effectively reduce their exposure to MitM attacks and maintain the confidentiality and integrity of critical data.
Question 203:
Which type of malware spreads autonomously across networks without user interaction?
A) Virus
B) Worm
C) Trojan
D) Spyware
Answer: B
Explanation:
Viruses require a host file or program to execute and propagate, relying on user action such as opening a file or running software. Trojans disguise themselves as legitimate applications, tricking users into execution, but do not replicate autonomously. Spyware collects information secretly but generally does not self-propagate.
Worms are self-replicating malware designed to spread across networks without user intervention. They exploit vulnerabilities in operating systems, applications, or network protocols to infect other systems. Worms can propagate rapidly, potentially causing widespread disruption, consuming bandwidth, and delivering payloads such as ransomware, keyloggers, or backdoors.
Effective mitigation involves patch management to close vulnerabilities, endpoint protection, network segmentation, intrusion detection systems, and user awareness. Regularly applying security patches is essential because worms exploit known vulnerabilities in software, operating systems, and network services. Unpatched systems provide the entry point for worms, allowing them to spread rapidly without requiring any user interaction. Endpoint protection solutions, including antivirus and anti-malware software, help detect and block worms before they can compromise critical systems, while network segmentation limits their ability to move laterally across an organization. Intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) monitor traffic for abnormal patterns, enabling early detection of worm activity.
User awareness training, although more critical for phishing and social engineering attacks, complements worm mitigation by ensuring that personnel understand the risks of leaving systems unpatched or improperly configured. Even though worms do not require human action to propagate, trained staff can contribute to reducing vulnerabilities by following security policies, reporting unusual system behavior, and maintaining up-to-date software.
Worms can be particularly dangerous in enterprise networks because they are self-propagating. A single infected machine can compromise an entire network in a short period, often overwhelming servers, consuming bandwidth, and causing system crashes. Some worms carry destructive payloads in addition to their replication behavior, leading to data loss, corruption of critical files, and disruption of essential services. Notable examples of worms include the WannaCry ransomware worm, which exploited the SMB protocol to spread rapidly across corporate networks, and the Conficker worm, which infected millions of computers worldwide. These examples underscore the significant operational and financial impact worms can have on organizations.
Understanding worms is critical because they bypass the need for human interaction, relying solely on automated propagation methods. Unlike viruses, which require user action to execute, worms can scan networks, exploit vulnerabilities, and replicate themselves autonomously. This autonomous behavior allows worms to spread exponentially, making early detection and preventive measures vital. Worms often leverage a combination of network scanning, exploit kits, and scripting to identify and infect vulnerable hosts, making network monitoring, anomaly detection, and real-time threat intelligence indispensable components of a security strategy.
In addition to technical defenses, organizations often implement layered security controls that combine firewalls, segmented subnets, and strict access controls to contain worm outbreaks. Sandboxing and endpoint isolation mechanisms can also prevent infected systems from communicating with the broader network, limiting propagation. Organizations should conduct regular tabletop exercises and incident response drills to prepare for worm outbreaks, ensuring that IT staff can quickly contain and remediate infections.
Worms are frequently used in cyber campaigns to maximize reach, targeting enterprise, government, and personal environments alike. Their rapid propagation, combined with potential destructive payloads, makes them highly effective for attackers seeking disruption, espionage, or financial gain. The lessons learned from past worm outbreaks highlight the importance of proactive security measures, timely patching, and continuous network monitoring.
The malware type that spreads autonomously without user action is a Worm, making it the correct answer. It is a critical threat vector in both enterprise and personal environments due to its rapid propagation, potential for damage, and ability to exploit unpatched vulnerabilities to compromise large networks quickly. Organizations that fail to implement preventive and detective controls are especially vulnerable to worm attacks, emphasizing the need for a multi-layered, proactive approach to cybersecurity.
Question 204:
Which control type is designed to prevent incidents before they occur?
A) Preventive
B) Detective
C) Corrective
D) Deterrent
Answer: A
Explanation:
Detective controls identify incidents after they occur, while Corrective controls restore systems or data after an event. Deterrent controls discourage unwanted activity but do not directly stop incidents.
Preventive controls proactively stop security incidents by blocking threats before they can affect systems. Examples include access controls, firewalls, encryption, strong authentication, secure coding practices, patching, network segmentation, and user training. Preventive controls aim to reduce both the likelihood and potential impact of incidents, creating barriers that prevent exploitation of vulnerabilities.
Proper implementation requires identifying critical assets, assessing risks, designing effective policies and technical measures, and continuously monitoring for gaps. Preventive controls are designed to stop security incidents before they occur, reducing the likelihood of breaches and minimizing potential damage. These controls are proactive in nature and form the first line of defense in any security framework. Preventive measures also complement detective and corrective controls to form a layered security strategy, ensuring that even if one control fails, others provide redundancy and additional protection.
Implementing preventive controls begins with a thorough understanding of an organization’s environment, including hardware, software, network infrastructure, and data. Critical assets must be identified and prioritized based on their sensitivity, value, and potential impact on operations if compromised. Risk assessments help determine which threats are most likely to occur and which vulnerabilities pose the greatest danger. This risk-informed approach ensures that preventive measures are targeted, effective, and aligned with organizational priorities.
Technical preventive controls can include firewalls, access controls, intrusion prevention systems, antivirus software, encryption, and secure configuration management. These tools act to block unauthorized access, prevent malware infections, and enforce security policies at multiple points within the system. For example, firewalls prevent unauthorized network traffic from reaching sensitive systems, while access controls ensure that users can only access the resources necessary for their roles. Antivirus software and intrusion prevention systems continuously monitor for known threat patterns and automatically block malicious activity, providing real-time protection. Encryption ensures that even if data is intercepted, it cannot be read without proper authorization.
Administrative preventive controls are equally important, including security policies, procedures, employee training, background checks, and separation of duties. Policies define acceptable behaviors and outline security expectations, while employee training programs educate staff on safe practices such as recognizing phishing attempts, using strong passwords, and handling sensitive data securely. Background checks help prevent insider threats by screening individuals before granting access to critical resources. Separation of duties ensures that no single individual can carry out critical actions alone, reducing the risk of intentional or accidental misuse.
Preventive controls also extend to physical security, such as locks, surveillance cameras, security guards, and environmental protections like fire suppression systems and climate control for data centers. Physical controls protect assets from theft, damage, or unauthorized access, ensuring continuity of operations. Combining technical, administrative, and physical preventive controls provides comprehensive protection across multiple layers, reinforcing the organization’s overall security posture.
Continuous monitoring and periodic testing are essential to maintain the effectiveness of preventive controls. Threat landscapes evolve rapidly, with new vulnerabilities, attack techniques, and regulatory requirements emerging regularly. Organizations must conduct vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, and audits to verify that preventive controls remain effective and are correctly implemented. Feedback from monitoring activities can be used to refine policies, update technical measures, and enhance employee training, creating a dynamic and adaptive security program.
Preventive controls also reduce the reliance on detective and corrective controls by stopping incidents before they occur, lowering response costs, and minimizing operational disruption. For example, proper network segmentation, strict access controls, and malware prevention can prevent breaches that would otherwise require extensive incident response, investigation, and recovery efforts. By addressing threats proactively, organizations improve resilience, maintain stakeholder confidence, and support compliance with industry standards and regulatory frameworks such as ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA, and GDPR.
The control type that acts before an incident occurs is Preventive, making it the correct answer. Preventive controls form the foundation of proactive security management and risk reduction. They are essential for maintaining a secure environment, protecting organizational assets, and reducing the probability and impact of security incidents. Organizations that prioritize preventive measures benefit from reduced operational risk, enhanced trust, and a stronger overall security posture, ensuring long-term protection against evolving threats.
Question 205:
Which backup type copies only the files that have changed since the last backup, and then resets the archive bit?
A) Full Backup
B) Differential Backup
C) Incremental Backup
D) Synthetic Full Backup
Answer: C
Explanation:
A full backup copies all files and data regardless of whether they have changed since the last backup. This method ensures a complete snapshot of the system, simplifying restoration because only the most recent full backup is required. However, it is resource-intensive, consuming significant storage space and time, especially in large environments. Full backups are essential for creating a baseline, but are often supplemented with other backup types to improve efficiency.
Differential backup copies all files that have changed since the last full backup without resetting the archive bit. This means each differential backup grows over time as more changes accumulate. While it simplifies restoration because only the full backup and the latest differential backup are needed, it does not reduce the size or processing time as much as incremental backups.
Incremental backup, on the other hand, copies only files that have changed since the last backup of any type (full or incremental) and then resets the archive bit. By tracking changes incrementally, it minimizes storage requirements and reduces backup time. Restoration requires the last full backup and all subsequent incremental backups in sequence, which can make recovery more complex but efficient in terms of storage and daily operations. This method is particularly beneficial in environments with large amounts of data and frequent changes, where full backups every day would be impractical.
Synthetic full backup combines previous full and incremental backups to create a new full backup without directly copying data from the source system. It reduces the impact on the production environment but does not inherently follow the differential or incremental behavior based on archive-bit resetting.
The backup type that specifically captures only changed files since the last backup, whether full or incremental, and resets the archive bit to track subsequent changes is Incremental Backup. This approach is designed to balance efficiency, resource usage, and recovery planning. Unlike full backups, which copy all data regardless of changes, incremental backups target only the files that have been modified since the last backup operation. This reduces the amount of data transferred, decreases storage requirements, and shortens backup windows, making it particularly suitable for environments with large volumes of data or limited backup windows.
Proper implementation of incremental backups requires careful planning and consideration of the organization’s backup strategy, including the frequency of full backups, retention policies, and recovery objectives. A typical approach involves performing a full backup at regular intervals, followed by incremental backups at shorter intervals. This ensures that all data is captured efficiently while minimizing resource consumption. By resetting the archive bit after each incremental backup, the system can accurately track which files have changed since the last backup, preventing unnecessary duplication of unchanged files.
Incremental backups also play a crucial role in disaster recovery planning. They allow organizations to restore systems to a specific point in time with minimal disruption. In the event of data loss, administrators can start with the most recent full backup and sequentially apply all subsequent incremental backups to recover the latest data. This layered recovery method ensures both data integrity and continuity of operations while reducing downtime. However, it is important to note that restoring from incremental backups can be more complex and time-consuming than restoring from a single full backup, as each incremental set must be applied in the correct sequence. Proper documentation, organization, and verification of backup sets are therefore critical to ensure successful recovery.
In enterprise environments, incremental backups are widely used to optimize backup windows and reduce network load. Large organizations often rely on incremental backups to maintain continuous data protection without overwhelming storage systems or bandwidth. Incremental backups can be integrated with automated backup solutions, allowing scheduled operations to run without manual intervention. This reduces the potential for human error and ensures that critical files are consistently protected. Additionally, combining incremental backups with full backups in a hybrid strategy provides both rapid recovery capabilities and efficient storage management.
Modern backup systems also enhance incremental backup functionality through features such as deduplication, compression, and cloud storage integration. Deduplication reduces redundant data by storing unique data blocks, while compression minimizes the size of backup files, further improving storage efficiency. Cloud-based incremental backups enable off-site storage, adding an extra layer of protection against physical disasters such as fires, floods, or hardware failures. With these enhancements, organizations can achieve a scalable and resilient backup strategy while maintaining cost-effectiveness and operational efficiency.
Incremental backups are not only important for IT operations but also for compliance and regulatory requirements. Many industries require organizations to maintain regular data backups and ensure the ability to restore critical records within defined timeframes. By implementing incremental backups as part of a broader data protection strategy, organizations can demonstrate due diligence in safeguarding data, maintaining operational continuity, and meeting regulatory obligations.
The backup type that captures only changed files since the last backup and resets the archive bit is Incremental Backup. Properly implemented, it ensures data integrity, reduces storage overhead, facilitates routine backup operations, and supports reliable disaster recovery planning. Incremental backups are widely used in enterprise environments to optimize backup windows, reduce network load, and maintain continuous data protection, making Incremental Backup the correct answer.
Question 206:
Which of the following best describes the concept of separation of duties in information security?
A) Assigning multiple responsibilities to a single employee to improve efficiency
B) Dividing critical tasks among multiple personnel to reduce fraud risk
C) Restricting access to systems based on job roles
D) Implementing multi-factor authentication for all users
Answer: B
Explanation:
A) Assigning multiple responsibilities to a single employee is the opposite of the separation of duties. This practice increases risk because one person could potentially complete a critical process alone, creating opportunities for fraud or error.
B) Dividing critical tasks among multiple personnel to reduce fraud risk is the correct description. Separation of duties ensures that no single individual has enough authority to complete high-risk transactions without oversight. For example, one person may authorize payments while another approves them. This reduces the likelihood of fraud, errors, or misuse of sensitive functions, strengthening internal controls.
C) Restricting access to systems based on job roles describes role-based access control (RBAC), which is related but not the same as separation of duties. RBAC enforces least privilege, whereas separation of duties ensures checks and balances in processes.
D) Implementing multi-factor authentication improves access security but does not address how tasks are divided among personnel. It helps verify identity, but does not prevent a single individual from abusing privileges.
B is correct because separation of duties is a preventive control aimed at reducing risk by ensuring that multiple people are involved in sensitive or high-impact processes, thereby minimizing the potential for errors, fraud, or abuse.
Question 207:
Which security model focuses primarily on maintaining the confidentiality of classified information in a hierarchical structure?
A) Bell-LaPadula Model
B) Biba Model
C) Clark-Wilson Model
D) Brewer-Nash Model
Answer: A
Explanation:
A) The Bell-LaPadula Model is designed to enforce confidentiality in a hierarchical environment. It uses two main rules: the Simple Security Property (“no read up”) and the *-property (“no write down”), preventing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data to lower clearance levels. This model is widely applied in military and government environments where confidentiality is paramount.
B) The Biba Model focuses on data integrity rather than confidentiality. It enforces “no write up” and “no read down” rules to prevent data corruption, but does not prioritize the confidentiality of information.
C) The Clark-Wilson Model is integrity-focused and relies on well-formed transactions and separation of duties to maintain data integrity. It is not primarily designed for confidentiality.
D) The Brewer-Nash Model, also known as the “Cinderella” or “Chinese Wall” model, enforces access controls to prevent conflicts of interest in commercial environments. It dynamically focuses on confidentiality but is context-specific and not hierarchical like Bell-LaPadula.
Bell-LaPadula is the correct answer because it explicitly addresses the confidentiality of data within a classified hierarchy, making it the foundational model for secure military and government information systems.
Question 208:
Which of the following is the most effective control for mitigating the risk of phishing attacks?
A) Deploying intrusion prevention systems (IPS)
B) Conducting regular employee security awareness training
C) Installing endpoint firewalls
D) Implementing data encryption
Answer: B
Explanation:
A) Intrusion prevention systems are useful for detecting and blocking network-based attacks but have limited effectiveness against phishing emails, which often rely on social engineering rather than technical exploits.
B) Conducting regular employee security awareness training is the most effective control for mitigating phishing risks. Phishing relies on tricking users into revealing credentials or executing malicious attachments. Awareness training teaches employees to recognize suspicious emails, avoid clicking on untrusted links, and report potential phishing attempts. Well-trained staff act as the first line of defense against social engineering attacks.
C) Endpoint firewalls control inbound and outbound traffic but do not prevent users from entering credentials on phishing sites. Firewalls primarily protect against network threats, not social engineering.
D) Implementing data encryption protects data confidentiality but does not prevent a user from giving away credentials or sensitive information through phishing. Encryption secures data at rest or in transit, but is not a preventive measure for social manipulation attacks.
Employee education is the key to combating phishing because technical controls alone cannot address the human factor. Security awareness programs reduce the likelihood of successful attacks by changing user behavior, making B the correct choice.
Question 209:
In a risk assessment, which of the following best defines residual risk?
A) Risk that is transferred to another party
B) Risk that remains after controls are implemented
C) Risk that is identified but ignored
D) Risk that is eliminated by controls
Answer: B
Explanation:
A) Risk that is transferred to another party, such as through insurance or outsourcing, is transferred risk. It does not represent the remaining exposure within the organization itself.
B) Risk that remains after controls are implemented is residual risk. Even with safeguards, no system can be 100% secure. Residual risk is the portion of risk that persists despite preventive, detective, and corrective controls. Organizations must identify and accept, mitigate further, or transfer this remaining risk as part of risk management planning.
C) Risk that is identified but ignored is unmanaged or unmitigated. It is a potential threat that has not been addressed and may lead to incidents, but it is not the formal concept of residual risk.
D) Risk that is eliminated by controls is residual risk of zero, which is unrealistic in most environments. Complete risk elimination is rarely achievable due to evolving threats and system complexity.
Residual risk is an essential concept in risk management. It acknowledges that controls reduce but do not eliminate threats. Effective governance involves assessing residual risk and deciding whether it is acceptable or requires further mitigation, making B the correct answer.
Question 210:
Which of the following access control types grants permissions based on rules defined by the resource owner?
A) Discretionary Access Control (DAC)
B) Mandatory Access Control (MAC)
C) Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
D) Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)
Answer: A
Explanation:
A) Discretionary Access Control grants permissions according to rules set by the resource owner. Owners can determine who can read, write, or execute their resources. DAC is flexible but can lead to inconsistent or insecure configurations if users are not careful with permission assignment.
B) Mandatory Access Control enforces access policies determined by a central authority, not the resource owner. MAC uses labels and classifications to control access based on sensitivity levels, making it less flexible but more secure in high-security environments.
C) Role-Based Access Control assigns permissions based on job roles rather than individual ownership. Users inherit access rights according to their role within the organization, which ensures consistent policy enforcement but is not defined by resource owners.
D) Attribute-Based Access Control evaluates multiple attributes (user, resource, environment) to make access decisions dynamically. ABAC is highly granular and flexible but relies on policy rules, not discretionary choices by individual owners.
DAC is correct because it empowers resource owners to define access rights. While flexible and easy to implement, it relies on user responsibility and awareness, distinguishing it from centralized or policy-driven models.