Microsoft AZ-104 Microsoft Azure Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 1 Q1-15
Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-104 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 1
You need to ensure that a virtual machine in Azure can automatically recover if it becomes unavailable. Which Azure feature should you use?
A) Azure Backup
B) Azure Site Recovery
C) Azure Monitor
D) Azure Automation
Answer: B) Azure Site Recovery
Explanation:
Azure Backup is a service designed to protect and recover data, including files, folders, and virtual machines. It allows organizations to create recovery points for critical data and virtual machine states, ensuring that information can be restored in the event of accidental deletion, corruption, or other types of data loss. While it is excellent for data retention and disaster recovery in terms of restoring data, Azure Backup does not provide real-time replication or the capability to automatically switch over virtual machines to a healthy environment if the original machine becomes unavailable. Its primary function is safeguarding data at rest and offering recovery options rather than ensuring continuous uptime for applications or workloads.
Azure Site Recovery, on the other hand, is a service specifically designed to ensure business continuity by orchestrating replication, failover, and recovery of virtual machines and workloads. It continuously replicates virtual machines to a secondary location, either within the same region or to another Azure region, depending on the configuration. In the event of an outage, hardware failure, or regional disruption, Azure Site Recovery can automatically fail over affected virtual machines to the secondary site. This ensures minimal downtime and allows critical workloads to remain operational without manual intervention. Additionally, it can be used to perform planned failovers for maintenance scenarios, testing, or migration, making it a versatile solution for both disaster recovery and business continuity planning.
Azure Monitor serves a completely different purpose. It is primarily a monitoring and observability service that collects metrics, logs, and telemetry data from Azure resources and on-premises systems. It allows administrators to track performance, detect anomalies, and create alerts based on thresholds or specific conditions. Although Azure Monitor can notify administrators when a virtual machine or service becomes unavailable or exhibits unhealthy behavior, it does not provide mechanisms for automatic failover or replication. Its focus is on observability and alerting rather than actively maintaining service availability during an outage.
Azure Automation is another Azure service that helps organizations automate repetitive administrative tasks through runbooks, configuration management, and process automation. It can automate backup, patching, or scaling tasks, and it can assist in recovery workflows by triggering scripts when failures are detected. However, it does not inherently provide the same real-time failover and replication capabilities as Azure Site Recovery. While it can complement recovery strategies, it cannot independently guarantee automatic recovery of virtual machines in case of outages.
Therefore, Azure Site Recovery is the most appropriate solution when the requirement is to ensure that virtual machines can automatically recover in the event of failures. Unlike Azure Backup, it provides continuous replication and orchestrated failover. Unlike Azure Monitor, it actively maintains uptime rather than only alerting administrators. Unlike Azure Automation, it offers built-in mechanisms for recovery without requiring complex scripting. By using Azure Site Recovery, organizations can maintain high availability, minimize downtime, and ensure business continuity, even during planned maintenance or unexpected disruptions. This makes it a critical component in any robust disaster recovery and high-availability strategy within Azure.
Question 2
You want to create a scalable web application hosted on Azure with minimal management overhead. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Virtual Machines
B) Azure App Service
C) Azure Kubernetes Service
D) Azure Functions
Answer: B) Azure App Service
Explanation:
Azure Virtual Machines (VMs) offer organizations full control over the operating system, installed software, and configuration of the environment. This level of control provides maximum flexibility, allowing IT teams to customize the infrastructure to meet specific application requirements. For example, administrators can install custom software, configure network settings, and optimize performance according to workload needs. However, this flexibility comes with significant management responsibilities. Organizations must handle patching, operating system updates, security configurations, and monitoring. Additionally, ensuring high availability and scalability requires careful planning, such as configuring availability sets, load balancers, or virtual machine scale sets. While Azure VMs are powerful and versatile, they demand substantial administrative effort, which can increase operational overhead, especially when managing multiple VMs across regions.
Azure App Service, in contrast, is a fully managed platform as a service (PaaS) designed to host web applications, RESTful APIs, and mobile backends without the need to manage the underlying infrastructure. App Service abstracts the complexities of operating system management, patching, and scaling, allowing developers to focus on application development rather than infrastructure maintenance. It offers built-in features like auto-scaling, deployment slots, and integrated monitoring, which simplify the deployment and management of applications. Because the platform handles patching and updates automatically, organizations reduce operational overhead and minimize risks associated with outdated systems. App Service is particularly beneficial for teams that want to deploy applications quickly while ensuring reliability, scalability, and security without deep infrastructure management expertise.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a managed container orchestration service that enables organizations to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications efficiently. AKS allows applications to run in containers, offering high flexibility, portability, and resource optimization. It is ideal for scenarios that require microservices architecture or large-scale, distributed applications. However, AKS introduces complexity because administrators must understand Kubernetes concepts such as pods, deployments, services, and cluster management. While the service automates tasks like node provisioning and upgrades, developers and IT teams still need expertise in managing containerized workloads and handling scaling, networking, and persistent storage within the cluster. Therefore, while AKS offers advanced capabilities, it comes with a steeper learning curve and management requirements compared to simpler PaaS solutions.
Azure Functions is a serverless compute service that executes code in response to events, such as HTTP requests, timers, or messages in a queue. It is highly cost-efficient for small, short-lived, event-driven tasks, as organizations only pay for the actual compute time consumed. However, Azure Functions is not suitable for hosting full-scale web applications that require persistent uptime, session management, and consistent performance. It is optimized for micro-tasks or backend processing rather than full application hosting.
In summary, Azure App Service provides the optimal balance between scalability, performance, and operational simplicity. Unlike VMs, it eliminates infrastructure management overhead, and unlike AKS or Functions, it supports full web applications with predictable performance. App Service allows organizations to deploy and scale web applications efficiently while minimizing administrative effort, making it the ideal choice for web application hosting in Azure.
Question 3
You need to control access to Azure resources by assigning roles to users based on their job functions. Which feature should you implement?
A) Azure Policies
B) Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
C) Azure Active Directory Conditional Access
D) Azure Resource Locks
Answer: B) Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
Explanation:
Azure Policies are an essential tool for organizations that need to enforce governance and compliance across their Azure environment. They allow administrators to define rules that ensure resources adhere to specific standards, such as requiring tags on resources, restricting certain virtual machine sizes, or enforcing the use of specific regions for deployments. By doing so, Azure Policies help maintain consistency, compliance, and cost management across multiple subscriptions and resource groups. However, while Azure Policies are powerful for enforcing rules and preventing misconfigurations, they do not provide mechanisms to assign or manage access permissions to resources. Their function is compliance enforcement rather than access control, which means they cannot be used to limit what actions users can perform on resources.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), on the other hand, is specifically designed to manage access to Azure resources based on the principle of least privilege. RBAC enables administrators to assign predefined roles, such as Contributor, Reader, or Owner, or create custom roles that align with the organization’s specific requirements. These roles can be assigned to users, groups, or service principals, and they define exactly what actions the assigned entities can perform on resources. For example, a user with the Reader role can view resources but cannot modify them, whereas a Contributor can create and manage resources but cannot assign roles. RBAC provides granular control over access, allowing organizations to ensure that users have only the permissions necessary for their job functions, which is crucial for maintaining security and operational integrity.
Azure Active Directory Conditional Access serves a different purpose. It focuses on access management at the authentication and session level, applying policies that determine whether a user can sign in under specific conditions. These conditions may include user location, device compliance status, risk level, or the requirement to use multi-factor authentication. Conditional Access is excellent for enhancing security and enforcing authentication requirements, but it does not assign permissions to resources. It does not control what a user can do once they are signed in; it only controls whether they are allowed to sign in under certain circumstances.
Azure Resource Locks are another feature that enhances protection for critical resources. They can prevent accidental deletion or modification by setting CanNotDelete or ReadOnly locks on resources. This ensures that important resources, such as production virtual machines or databases, are not inadvertently altered. However, Resource Locks do not manage access on a per-user or per-role basis. They apply universally to all users with the appropriate access to the resource, providing protection rather than selective permission assignment.
RBAC is the correct solution for controlling access based on job functions because it directly addresses the requirement to assign appropriate permissions to users or groups. It ensures that users can perform only the actions necessary for their roles, minimizing security risks and supporting organizational compliance. Unlike Azure Policies, Conditional Access, or Resource Locks, RBAC provides flexible, fine-grained access management, making it the ideal choice for enforcing role-based access control across Azure resources. By implementing RBAC effectively, organizations can maintain security, streamline operations, and ensure that users have the appropriate level of access aligned with their responsibilities.
Question 4
You need to ensure that an Azure Storage account can be accessed only over HTTPS. Which feature should you enable?
A) Azure Firewall
B) Secure Transfer Required
C) Shared Access Signature (SAS)
D) Network Security Group (NSG)
Answer: B) Secure Transfer Required
Explanation:
Azure provides several tools and features to control access, protect data, and manage network traffic for resources such as storage accounts. Azure Firewall is a managed, cloud-based network security service that protects Azure Virtual Network resources. It provides centralized network traffic filtering, including application-level and network-level rules, logging, and threat intelligence. While Azure Firewall is highly effective in controlling inbound and outbound traffic to resources, it operates at the network level and does not specifically enforce secure connections for Azure Storage accounts. In other words, it cannot ensure that all communications to a storage account use HTTPS, which is essential for protecting data in transit.
Secure Transfer Required is a feature built directly into Azure Storage accounts that addresses this exact requirement. When enabled, this setting mandates that all requests to the storage account use secure protocols, specifically HTTPS. Any request made using HTTP is automatically rejected. By enforcing encrypted communications, Secure Transfer Required ensures that data is protected from eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle attacks, or unauthorized interception while being transmitted between clients and Azure Storage. This feature is crucial for organizations handling sensitive or confidential information, as it ensures compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements, including data protection laws.
Shared Access Signature (SAS) is another important Azure feature that provides granular, temporary access to storage resources such as blobs, files, queues, or tables. With SAS, administrators can specify permissions, such as read, write, or delete, along with a defined validity period for external users or applications. While SAS is highly useful for securely sharing data without exposing storage account keys, it does not automatically enforce HTTPS. Clients can still generate SAS tokens and attempt to use them over HTTP unless Secure Transfer Required is also enabled. Therefore, SAS addresses controlled access rather than ensuring secure transport for all data transfers.
Network Security Groups (NSGs) are another layer of security in Azure that control inbound and outbound traffic to subnets and network interfaces based on rules for IP addresses, ports, and protocols. NSGs are highly effective for segmenting networks and preventing unauthorized access from specific IP ranges or ports. However, NSGs operate at a lower level in the network stack and cannot enforce the use of HTTPS when accessing Azure Storage resources. They manage traffic at the network layer rather than the application or transport layer, where protocol enforcement occurs.
Enabling Secure Transfer Required on a storage account is the most straightforward and effective approach to guarantee that all communications use encrypted channels. This ensures that data in transit is protected against interception and meets security and compliance standards. It complements other security measures, such as SAS for controlled access and NSGs or Azure Firewall for network-level filtering, by providing encryption enforcement for all clients. By combining these features, organizations can achieve a comprehensive security posture for their Azure Storage accounts, ensuring that data is both securely transmitted and accessible only to authorized users.
Question 5
You need to implement a solution that provides high availability and automatic load distribution for web applications in Azure. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Load Balancer
B) Azure Traffic Manager
C) Azure Application Gateway
D) Azure Front Door
Answer: D) Azure Front Door
Explanation:
Azure provides several services to manage and distribute network traffic to applications and resources, each with unique capabilities and use cases. Azure Load Balancer is a foundational service that distributes incoming network traffic among virtual machines within the same region. It operates at Layer 4 of the OSI model, which means it works with TCP and UDP protocols. By distributing traffic evenly across virtual machines, Load Balancer helps maintain availability and reliability for applications hosted within a single region. It supports both inbound and outbound scenarios, provides health probes to ensure traffic is only sent to healthy instances, and can handle millions of flows simultaneously. However, it is limited to basic layer 4 functionality and cannot perform intelligent application-level routing, SSL termination, or content-based traffic decisions. This makes it ideal for simple, high-performance load balancing within a region but less suitable for complex web applications or global traffic distribution.
Azure Traffic Manager takes a different approach by providing DNS-based traffic routing to distribute requests across multiple regions or endpoints. Traffic Manager is effective for global failover scenarios, helping direct user requests to the nearest or healthiest endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including priority, performance, geographic, and weighted routing, which can optimize user experience and availability across regions. However, Traffic Manager does not operate in real time at the application layer, and it cannot perform deep inspection or content-based routing decisions. Since it relies on DNS resolution, routing changes may be delayed due to DNS caching, limiting its responsiveness in dynamic traffic conditions.
Azure Application Gateway is a Layer 7 load balancer designed specifically for web applications. It allows administrators to perform content-based routing, SSL termination, session affinity, and web application firewall (WAF) protection. Application Gateway is highly effective for managing and securing HTTP/HTTPS traffic within a single region. It supports URL-based routing, multiple-site hosting, and custom routing rules, enabling fine-grained traffic management for complex web applications. While it excels at application-layer routing and security, its scope is limited to regional deployment. It does not provide a global traffic management solution across multiple Azure regions.
Azure Front Door is a global, scalable, Layer 7 load-balancing service that combines the capabilities of a content delivery network (CDN) with advanced web application routing. Front Door provides automatic failover to ensure high availability, distributes traffic globally, performs SSL offloading, and optimizes application performance using intelligent routing and caching at the edge. It can direct users to the closest or fastest endpoint, reduce latency, and handle large-scale, global traffic patterns. Front Door also integrates health probes and real-time monitoring, ensuring traffic is routed only to healthy endpoints. Unlike Load Balancer or Application Gateway, Front Door operates at a global scale and provides both performance optimization and high availability for web applications across multiple regions.
In summary, while Azure Load Balancer, Traffic Manager, and Application Gateway serve important roles within their scopes, Azure Front Door is the optimal solution for globally distributed web applications that require high availability, automatic failover, and performance optimization. It combines advanced Layer 7 routing, SSL termination, and global traffic distribution, ensuring users experience low latency, resilience, and consistent access across multiple regions. For enterprises aiming to deliver highly available, scalable, and performant web applications worldwide, Azure Front Door is the ideal choice.
Question 6
You plan to store sensitive data in Azure and must encrypt it at rest using Microsoft-managed keys. Which feature should you use?
A) Azure Key Vault
B) Storage Service Encryption (SSE)
C) Transparent Data Encryption (TDE)
D) Azure Disk Encryption
Answer: B) Storage Service Encryption (SSE)
Explanation:
Azure provides a range of encryption options to protect data at rest, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure and compliant with regulatory requirements. One of the key services for managing encryption in Azure is Azure Key Vault. Azure Key Vault allows organizations to store and manage cryptographic keys, secrets, and certificates securely. It is particularly useful when organizations want to implement customer-managed encryption, meaning they maintain control over the keys used to encrypt and decrypt data. While Key Vault provides a high level of control and security, it does not automatically encrypt data at rest in Azure Storage accounts unless integrated with services such as Storage Service Encryption. This means administrators must perform additional configuration and ensure proper integration for Key Vault-managed keys to protect storage data effectively. Without this integration, data stored in Azure Storage is not encrypted using customer-managed keys, and additional steps are required to ensure compliance and security.
Storage Service Encryption (SSE), on the other hand, is a fully managed feature built directly into Azure Storage accounts. SSE automatically encrypts all data at rest using Microsoft-managed keys. The encryption process is transparent to the user and requires no additional configuration, which significantly reduces administrative overhead. By enabling SSE, every file, blob, or object stored in the Azure Storage account is automatically encrypted and decrypted as it is written and read. This ensures that sensitive data is protected against unauthorized access, accidental exposure, and compliance violations. SSE also helps organizations meet regulatory requirements, such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO standards, by providing strong encryption and seamless management without requiring additional operational effort from administrators.
Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) is another encryption solution, but it is specific to Azure SQL Databases. TDE encrypts database files, log files, and backups at rest, protecting SQL data from unauthorized access. While TDE is effective for database workloads, it does not apply to general storage accounts or other types of non-database storage, which limits its applicability in scenarios where multiple types of storage need encryption. Therefore, TDE is not a suitable solution for encrypting Azure Storage data at rest.
Azure Disk Encryption (ADE) provides encryption for virtual machine disks, using technologies such as BitLocker for Windows VMs and DM-Crypt for Linux VMs. ADE allows organizations to protect operating system and data disks from unauthorized access. However, unlike SSE, ADE requires configuration and ongoing management. Administrators must manage encryption keys, monitor disk encryption status, and ensure proper integration with Key Vault if using customer-managed keys. This additional management complexity makes ADE more suitable for VM-specific disk protection rather than general storage account encryption.
In conclusion, Storage Service Encryption (SSE) is the most appropriate solution for automatically encrypting Azure Storage data at rest. It provides strong encryption using Microsoft-managed keys, requires no additional configuration, and ensures compliance with security and regulatory requirements. Unlike Azure Key Vault, TDE, or Azure Disk Encryption, SSE delivers seamless encryption for all storage types within a storage account, minimizing administrative effort while maximizing data protection. By enabling SSE, organizations can confidently secure their storage data against unauthorized access and maintain compliance with minimal operational overhead.
Question 7
You need to monitor Azure resources and receive alerts based on metrics. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Log Analytics
B) Azure Monitor
C) Azure Security Center
D) Azure Advisor
Answer: B) Azure Monitor
Explanation:
Azure provides a variety of tools and services to monitor, analyze, and maintain the health and performance of resources deployed in the cloud. One of the foundational services for log collection and analysis is Azure Log Analytics. Log Analytics is a component of Azure Monitor that collects telemetry data from various Azure resources, applications, and on-premises environments. It enables administrators to write complex queries using the Kusto Query Language (KQL) to analyze logs, detect patterns, and gain insights into system behavior. While Log Analytics is powerful for querying and analyzing data, it is primarily a log analytics tool and does not, by itself, provide alerting capabilities. Administrators can gain valuable insights into operational performance, but without integration with other services, proactive monitoring and automated notifications are limited.
Azure Monitor provides a more comprehensive solution that addresses the limitations of Log Analytics by offering a full suite of monitoring, alerting, and visualization capabilities. Azure Monitor collects both metrics and logs from Azure resources, enabling administrators to track performance, availability, and health in real time. Metrics provide numerical data points for resource utilization, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, while logs provide detailed records of events, operations, and system states. With Azure Monitor, administrators can define alerts based on specific thresholds, such as when CPU usage exceeds 80% or when an application experiences repeated failures. These alerts can trigger automated actions, such as invoking an Azure Logic App, sending notifications to operations teams, or scaling resources to maintain performance. By combining data collection, analysis, visualization, and automated alerting, Azure Monitor enables proactive management and rapid response to potential issues before they impact end users.
Azure Security Center (now part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud) focuses primarily on security posture management, threat detection, and regulatory compliance. It continuously assesses the security configuration of Azure resources, provides recommendations to remediate vulnerabilities, and detects suspicious or anomalous activity that could indicate a security threat. While Security Center is critical for maintaining the security of workloads, it does not provide the same breadth of performance or health monitoring capabilities as Azure Monitor. Its primary role is security, rather than general infrastructure monitoring or alerting based on operational metrics.
Azure Advisor is another Azure service that provides personalized recommendations based on best practices for cost optimization, performance, reliability, and operational efficiency. It analyzes resource configurations and usage patterns and suggests improvements to optimize deployments. However, Azure Advisor is not a real-time monitoring tool and does not provide alerts when metrics cross thresholds or when immediate action is required. It is a planning and optimization tool rather than a proactive monitoring solution.
In conclusion, Azure Monitor is the correct choice for monitoring Azure resources in real time, generating alerts, and supporting proactive management. Unlike Log Analytics, which focuses on querying and analyzing logs, Azure Monitor integrates metrics, logs, visualization, and automated alerting into a unified platform. Unlike Security Center, it is designed for general performance and health monitoring rather than security, and unlike Azure Advisor, it provides real-time, actionable insights rather than periodic recommendations. By using Azure Monitor, organizations can detect issues promptly, respond to incidents automatically, and maintain optimal performance and availability for their applications and infrastructure in the cloud.
Question 8
You need to provide temporary access to an Azure Storage blob for a partner without sharing your storage account keys. What should you use?
A) Shared Access Signature (SAS)
B ) Azure AD Role Assignment
C) Storage Account Key
D) Network Security Group
Answer: A) Shared Access Signature (SAS)
Explanation:
Shared Access Signature (SAS) generates a URI with a token granting limited-time access to storage resources without exposing account keys, ideal for temporary access. Azure AD Role Assignment allows assigning permissions to users, groups, or applications, but is not suitable for short-term external access. Storage Account Key provides full access to the entire storage account, which is insecure for temporary or restricted access. Network Security Group controls inbound and outbound traffic based on IP addresses and ports but does not provide resource-level access. SAS is the correct method because it ensures secure, granular, and temporary access for partners without compromising the overall security of the storage account.
Question 9
You need to deploy multiple identical virtual machines for a high-performance application. Which Azure feature should you use?
A) Availability Set
B) Virtual Machine Scale Set
C) Azure Kubernetes Service
D) Azure Container Instances
Answer: B) Virtual Machine Scale Set
Explanation:
Ensuring high availability and scalability for virtual machines in Azure requires understanding the differences between services designed for workload management and replication. Availability Sets are a core feature in Azure that help maintain high availability of virtual machines within a single datacenter. They work by distributing virtual machines across multiple fault domains and update domains. Fault domains provide physical separation of resources, ensuring that hardware failures, such as a server rack outage, do not affect all virtual machines simultaneously. Update domains provide logical separation for planned maintenance, allowing Azure to update subsets of VMs sequentially without impacting the entire workload. While Availability Sets enhance resilience and help maintain uptime, they have limitations. They do not automatically scale virtual machines based on demand, nor do they facilitate the deployment of multiple identical VMs in a single configuration. Administrators must manually provision each virtual machine, which can be time-consuming and less efficient for large-scale deployments.
Virtual Machine Scale Sets (VMSS) are designed to address these limitations by enabling the deployment and management of a group of identical virtual machines. VMSS provides automatic scaling based on predefined rules, metrics, or demand patterns. For example, if CPU utilization or memory usage exceeds a certain threshold, the scale set can automatically add new instances to handle the increased load. Similarly, when demand decreases, VMSS can remove instances to optimize costs. This automatic scaling capability makes Virtual Machine Scale Sets ideal for high-performance workloads, web applications, or services that experience fluctuating demand. Additionally, VMSS integrates with Azure Load Balancer, allowing traffic to be distributed efficiently across all instances in the set, ensuring both reliability and performance.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is another solution that focuses on orchestrating containerized applications. AKS allows developers to deploy applications in containers and scale them horizontally by adding or removing pods. While AKS provides powerful orchestration and management for microservices and containerized workloads, it does not operate at the virtual machine level in the same way as VMSS. It manages pods rather than full VM instances, and while nodes in an AKS cluster can be scaled automatically, the primary focus is container orchestration rather than uniform VM deployment. AKS is excellent for applications designed for microservices architecture but may introduce complexity if the goal is simply to deploy and scale identical virtual machines.
Azure Container Instances (ACI) provide a serverless approach to running containers without managing the underlying virtual machines. ACI is useful for quickly running containerized tasks, testing workloads, or handling ephemeral jobs. However, it does not support large-scale, uniform virtual machine deployments or provide the same load distribution and scaling capabilities as Virtual Machine Scale Sets. ACI is better suited for lightweight, temporary, or single-purpose workloads rather than full-scale virtual machine orchestration.
In summary, Virtual Machine Scale Sets are the optimal solution when organizations need to deploy multiple identical virtual machines with automatic scaling and integrated load balancing. Unlike Availability Sets, VMSS supports rapid deployment and scaling, reducing administrative overhead and enabling efficient management of high-performance workloads. Unlike AKS or ACI, VMSS operates at the VM level, providing full control over the virtual machines while maintaining scalability, availability, and uniformity. By using VMSS, organizations can achieve a balance of performance, reliability, and operational efficiency for applications that require consistent and scalable VM deployment.
Question 10
You need to implement a network solution that isolates Azure virtual networks while allowing selective communication. Which service should you use?
A) Network Security Group
B) Azure Firewall
C) Virtual Network Peering
D) Azure Application Gateway
Answer: C) Virtual Network Peering
Explanation:
Network Security Groups filter traffic at the subnet or NIC level but do not connect separate virtual networks. Azure Firewall provides centralized network filtering and threat protection but does not directly create peering connections. Virtual Network Peering connects two Azure virtual networks seamlessly, allowing private IP communication between them while keeping them logically separate, enabling selective connectivity without exposing resources to the public internet. Azure Application Gateway is a layer 7 load balancer and does not provide network isolation or peering. Virtual Network Peering is correct because it enables secure, high-speed connectivity between virtual networks while maintaining network isolation and management flexibility.
Question 11
You need to enforce organizational policies across all Azure subscriptions in a consistent manner. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Policy
B) Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
C) Azure Blueprint
D) Azure Monitor
Answer: A) Azure Policy
Explanation:
Azure Policy allows defining rules that enforce standards across resources, such as requiring tags or specific SKUs, and ensures compliance automatically. Role-Based Access Control manages user access to resources but does not enforce policy compliance across subscriptions. Azure Blueprint helps deploy resources along with policies, roles, and templates consistently, but it is primarily used for initial deployment, not ongoing enforcement. Azure Monitor collects metrics and logs for monitoring but does not enforce policies. Azure Policy is correct because it provides continuous enforcement of rules and compliance across multiple subscriptions, ensuring resources adhere to organizational standards.
Question 12
You need to deploy a Linux VM in Azure with minimal upfront configuration and integrated management. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Virtual Machines
B) Azure Container Instances
C) Azure App Service
D) Azure Kubernetes Service
Answer: A) Azure Virtual Machines
Explanation:
Azure Virtual Machines provide full operating system control, allowing deployment of Linux VMs with minimal configuration required, supporting custom images, and integration with Azure management tools like monitoring and backup. Azure Container Instances are for running containers without managing a full VM environment, not suitable for traditional VM workloads. Azure App Service is designed for web applications and does not provide full OS-level access. Azure Kubernetes Service orchestrates containerized workloads and requires cluster setup, which is more complex than deploying a single VM. Azure Virtual Machines is correct because it provides direct deployment of Linux VMs with integrated management features while minimizing initial setup complexity.
Question 13
You want to reduce storage costs for rarely accessed Azure data while keeping it available if needed. Which storage tier should you use?
A) Hot
B) Cool
C) Premium
D) Archive
Answer: B) Cool
Explanation:
Hot storage is optimized for frequently accessed data with higher cost per GB but low access latency. Cool storage is designed for infrequently accessed data, offering lower storage costs while keeping data immediately accessible when required. Premium storage is high-performance SSD storage suitable for workloads requiring low latency but more expensive, not cost-efficient for rarely accessed data. Archive storage provides the lowest storage cost but has high retrieval latency and is best suited for long-term retention rather than occasional access. Cool tier is correct because it balances cost savings with accessibility for data that is not frequently used but must remain available on demand.
Question 14
You need to ensure a virtual machine can connect to an on-premises network using encrypted traffic. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Application Gateway
D) Azure Firewall
Answer: B) VPN Gateway
Explanation:
Azure provides multiple networking solutions to connect on-premises environments with cloud resources, each serving different purposes and offering distinct capabilities. Among these, VPN Gateway is the service specifically designed to create secure, encrypted connections between Azure virtual networks and on-premises networks, ensuring that data remains private and protected while traversing public networks. Understanding the differences between Azure networking services is crucial for designing a secure and reliable hybrid cloud architecture.
Azure ExpressRoute is a networking solution that establishes private, dedicated connections between an on-premises infrastructure and Azure datacenters. This connection bypasses the public internet, providing high throughput, low latency, and reliable connectivity, which is ideal for scenarios requiring predictable network performance or large-scale data transfer. However, ExpressRoute does not inherently encrypt traffic. While the connection is private and isolated from the public internet, the data traveling over the circuit is not encrypted by default. Organizations with strict regulatory or compliance requirements may need to implement additional encryption measures at the application or transport layer to ensure data confidentiality.
VPN Gateway, in contrast, is specifically designed to create secure connections over public networks. Using industry-standard IPsec and IKE protocols, VPN Gateway enables encrypted site-to-site and point-to-site connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure virtual networks. This encryption ensures that data is protected from interception or tampering while in transit, maintaining confidentiality and integrity. VPN Gateway supports both policy-based and route-based VPNs, providing flexibility for different network topologies. It also integrates with Azure networking services to enable secure communication between Azure virtual networks, on-premises data centers, and even remote clients. For organizations with distributed workforces or hybrid cloud architectures, VPN Gateway is an essential tool for maintaining secure connectivity without requiring dedicated physical circuits.
Other Azure networking services serve complementary but different functions. Azure Application Gateway operates at the application layer (Layer 7) and provides load balancing, SSL termination, and web application firewall capabilities. While it can secure traffic between clients and web applications through SSL/TLS termination, it is not designed to establish encrypted site-to-site or point-to-site connections. Azure Firewall, on the other hand, is a cloud-native network security service that filters and monitors network traffic based on rules, inspecting inbound and outbound flows. Although it provides threat protection and access control, Azure Firewall does not create encrypted tunnels between on-premises and Azure resources. Therefore, while both Application Gateway and Azure Firewall enhance security in specific contexts, neither provides the core capability of encrypted network connectivity that VPN Gateway offers.
In summary, VPN Gateway is the correct solution for enabling secure, encrypted connectivity between Azure virtual networks and on-premises resources over public networks. Unlike ExpressRoute, which offers private but unencrypted connections, VPN Gateway ensures that all transmitted data is encrypted using IPsec/IKE protocols, preserving confidentiality and integrity. While Application Gateway and Azure Firewall provide valuable security features, they do not replace the need for point-to-site or site-to-site encrypted tunnels. By implementing VPN Gateway, organizations can securely extend their on-premises environments into Azure, enabling hybrid cloud architectures that maintain data privacy, compliance, and secure communication across the internet.
Question 15
You need to track changes made to Azure resources for auditing and compliance purposes. Which service should you use?
A) Azure Activity Log
B) Azure Monitor
C) Azure Advisor
D) Azure Security Center
Answer: A) Azure Activity Log
Explanation:
Azure Activity Log is a critical feature in Microsoft Azure that provides a comprehensive record of all control-plane operations performed on Azure resources. Control-plane operations encompass activities such as creating, updating, or deleting resources, as well as modifications to configuration settings or role assignments. Every operation executed through the Azure portal, Azure PowerShell, Azure CLI, or APIs is captured in the Activity Log, offering administrators a centralized and detailed audit trail of all management actions within their Azure environment. This capability is essential for organizations that require transparency, accountability, and compliance with internal policies or external regulatory standards.
The Activity Log is distinct from other monitoring and management tools within Azure because its primary focus is on auditing and recording operations rather than analyzing performance or providing recommendations. For example, Azure Monitor collects metrics and diagnostic logs primarily for monitoring the performance, availability, and health of resources. While Azure Monitor is vital for identifying issues and alerting administrators to operational problems, it does not inherently track or audit which user or service performed a specific action, nor does it provide a complete historical record of resource changes. Similarly, Azure Advisor is a guidance tool that delivers actionable recommendations for improving cost efficiency, security posture, performance, and reliability. Although it helps optimize resources, Azure Advisor does not log the actual operations or changes performed on the resources, meaning it cannot serve as a source of auditing or compliance verification.
Azure Security Center, now part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud, emphasizes security posture management and threat detection. It monitors resources for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and potential threats and provides recommendations to remediate risks. While Security Center is excellent for proactive security management, it does not track control-plane activities or maintain a historical record of changes, making it unsuitable for auditing or compliance-focused tracking.
In contrast, Azure Activity Log captures all management-level operations in real-time, including who performed the action, what action was taken, when it occurred, and the status of the operation. This detailed information allows administrators to investigate incidents, verify operational accountability, and analyze changes over time. The audit trail provided by the Activity Log is indispensable for regulatory compliance frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and SOC standards, which require detailed records of administrative actions. Additionally, the Activity Log integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, allowing logs to be exported to Log Analytics, Event Hubs, or Storage Accounts for long-term retention, advanced queries, and correlation with other data sources.
By leveraging the Azure Activity Log, organizations gain full visibility into resource management operations, can detect unauthorized changes, and enforce governance policies more effectively. It ensures that administrators and auditors have a trustworthy and auditable record of all actions, fulfilling both operational oversight and compliance requirements. Unlike monitoring tools or advisory services, the Activity Log provides an authoritative source for tracking who did what, when, and how within the Azure environment, making it the correct and essential choice for auditing and compliance purposes.