Microsoft SC-300 Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 15 Q211-225
Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 211:
Your organization wants to prevent external users from accessing SharePoint sites unless their identity meets specific security requirements such as MFA enforcement by their home tenant. Which Azure AD B2B feature allows enforcing these requirements on guest users?
A) Cross-tenant access settings
B) Access Reviews
C) Identity Governance lifecycle workflows
D) Privileged Identity Management
Answer: A
Explanation:
Cross-tenant access settings provide a powerful mechanism for administrators to control how external identities interact with corporate resources. This feature allows an organization to specify inbound and outbound trust rules governing users from external Azure AD tenants. One of the key capabilities is enforcing security requirements on guest users, such as requiring that they authenticate using multifactor authentication enforced by their home tenant.
The organization can configure inbound trust settings to accept or reject external claims such as MFA, compliant device, or hybrid join signals. If the external tenant satisfies these requirements, the guest user gains access; if not, the sign-in is blocked. This ensures the corporate environment maintains strict security without taking ownership of managing external identities. Access Reviews ensure that external users maintain appropriate access over time, but they do not impose real-time authentication controls or enforce MFA at sign-in. They simply allow administrators and resource owners to periodically review and remove unnecessary access.
Lifecycle workflows automate onboarding and offboarding processes inside the home tenant. These workflows are not designed for enforcing authentication standards on guest users because they cannot evaluate or control identity signals coming from external tenants. Privileged Identity Management manages privileged roles and enforces activation requirements but does not govern external tenant interactions or impose authentication standards for B2B guest users.
Cross-tenant access settings directly address the problem of controlling access from external users and verifying external security claims. By configuring trust settings for multifactor authentication, device compliance, or hybrid join, administrators can fine-tune the conditions under which external users can access SharePoint, Teams, or other Microsoft 365 resources.
This provides a security boundary aligned with zero-trust principles and reduces the risk posed by unmanaged or insecure external identities. Because cross-tenant access settings alone provide trust evaluations and enforcement of security claims on external users, it is the correct answer.
Question 212:
Your organization wants to allow external users to sign in with their own identity providers, but without creating Microsoft accounts. Which feature supports federation with social identity providers such as Google or Facebook?
A) Azure AD External Identities
B) Azure AD Domain Services
C) Conditional Access
D) Access Packages
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure AD External Identities enables organizations to allow external users to sign in using identities from a broad range of identity providers, including social accounts such as Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn. This eliminates the need for users to create Microsoft accounts or Azure AD accounts to collaborate. Instead, they authenticate with their existing identity, and Azure AD handles token issuance and B2B integration. External Identities provide a flexible configuration model that supports OAuth2, OpenID Connect, and SAML-based IdPs, making it ideal for collaboration scenarios where the organization wants to remove friction for partners, customers, or consumers.
Azure AD Domain Services provides legacy domain-join, LDAP, and Kerberos support for workloads that require classic AD operations. It does not support social ID federation and is not used for B2B collaboration or web application authentication. Conditional Access enforces authentication requirements, session restrictions, or device rules, but it does not handle the federation process with external identity providers. It evaluates policies after the authentication provider issues tokens, not before.
Azure AD External Identities extends an organization’s identity platform beyond internal users, enabling secure authentication for partners, vendors, contractors, and consumers using non-Microsoft identities. While Access Packages streamline onboarding and entitlement assignment, they do not handle authentication, identity federation, or support for social identity providers. This distinction is critical: Access Packages answer the “What access should a user receive?” question, whereas External Identities answer the “How should the user authenticate and sign in?” question.
Azure AD External Identities allows organizations to federate with a wide range of identity providers, including Google, Facebook, GitHub, Apple, and SAML/WS-Fed identity systems. This capability gives external users the flexibility to authenticate using accounts they already control. It reduces friction, improves user experience, and eliminates the need for external users to manage separate usernames and passwords. This reduces administrative overhead while supporting large-scale collaboration scenarios. External Identities supports both business-to-business (B2B) collaborations and business-to-consumer (B2C) experiences, making it highly adaptable.
In addition to flexible authentication options, External Identities supports user flows and custom policies, enabling organizations to define the exact authentication experience. These flows can manage processes such as email verification, multifactor authentication, password reset, identity proofing, and progressive attribute collection. Organizations can tailor the onboarding experience depending on the sensitivity of the resource being accessed or regulatory requirements. For example, certain applications may require phone number verification or government ID validation, while others may allow sign-in with social accounts alone.
Security controls within Azure AD, such as Conditional Access, Identity Protection, and risk-based evaluation, also extend to External Identities scenarios. This ensures that external users—despite using consumer or federated accounts—are still subject to the organization’s security posture. Administrators can enforce location restrictions, device policies, or MFA requirements based on the sensitivity of the application.
Azure AD External Identities also improves governance by integrating with Access Packages and Access Reviews. While Access Packages determine what resources a guest can access, External Identities handles how the guest authenticates. Combined, these features provide a structured, secure solution for onboarding, governing, and offboarding external users. Audit logs, sign-in logs, and usage analytics further support monitoring and regulatory compliance.
Because Azure AD External Identities uniquely supports authentication with consumer and social identity providers, offers customizable user flows, integrates with enterprise-grade security controls, and enables seamless federation, it is the correct and only solution designed specifically for external identity authentication—not Access Packages, Seamless SSO, or any other capability.
Question 213:
A security team wants to ensure that sign-ins from unfamiliar locations trigger additional security measures, such as requiring MFA. Which Azure AD capability detects unfamiliar location patterns and flags them?
A) Identity Protection user risk detection
B) Conditional Access device filters
C) On-premises data gateway
D) Access Reviews for groups
Answer: A
Explanation:
Identity Protection user risk detection analyzes user behavior across Microsoft’s identity ecosystem to identify anomalies such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations. When a user logs in from a location that is not part of their typical sign-in pattern, and no prior history establishes that location as trusted, Identity Protection may classify the event as medium or high risk depending on other correlated signals. This allows organizations to enforce risk-based Conditional Access policies that require MFA, block access, or trigger password resets.
The system continuously learns from user activity, adapting to typical travel patterns, time zones, devices, and ISPs. Conditional Access device filters constrain access based on properties of devices such as manufacturer, OS version, or join state. They do not detect unfamiliar locations or evaluate sign-in behavior. On-premises data gateway facilitates connectivity between on-premises systems and cloud services but has nothing to do with identity risk or sign-in analysis. Access Reviews target periodic verification of group memberships, application access, or privilege allocations and are not used for detecting sign-in anomalies. Identity Protection processes billions of authentications daily, enabling it to model typical behavior and identify deviations at scale.
Azure AD Identity Protection enhances authentication security by applying real-time threat intelligence and machine learning models to sign-in events. This continuous analysis enables the system to identify anomalies that indicate potential compromise, including impossible travel, atypical locations, suspicious IP addresses, and unusual client behaviors. Instead of relying solely on static rules, Identity Protection dynamically evaluates each sign-in and assigns a risk score—low, medium, or high—based on detected threat indicators. These risk signals are drawn from Microsoft’s global threat intelligence network, which monitors billions of daily authentications across Microsoft services, giving Identity Protection a broad data set to recognize emerging attack patterns.
One of the most powerful aspects of Identity Protection is its ability to incorporate intelligence regarding IP addresses associated with malicious activity, such as anonymous proxy systems, botnets, TOR exit nodes, malware-infected networks, or IP ranges previously flagged for credential attacks. When a login originates from such an IP, the system instantly elevates the risk level. This allows organizations to respond to threats proactively, rather than reactively, while still maintaining seamless access for legitimate users. Identity Protection also considers leaked or compromised credentials. If a user’s username and password appear in global breach datasets, the system automatically marks their account as high risk, enabling administrators to enforce immediate remediation policies.
Administrators can configure Conditional Access policies that respond directly to risk levels. Rather than prompting MFA for every sign-in, organizations can choose to require MFA only when risk is detected—such as when a user logs in from an unfamiliar location or a suspicious IP address. This adaptive enforcement reduces friction for everyday users while applying stronger security measures precisely when needed. For example, if an employee typically signs in from Pakistan but suddenly attempts to authenticate from Europe within minutes, Identity Protection flags this as impossible travel and triggers MFA or blocks the request entirely. This intelligent, context-aware evaluation significantly strengthens security without compromising productivity.
Additionally, Identity Protection provides detailed insights and audit logs that reveal why specific sign-ins were flagged, what risk signals were involved, and how policies responded. These logs are critical for incident response, post-event investigation, compliance reporting, and security optimization. Administrators can review trends in risky sign-ins, identify compromised accounts, and improve their security posture based on data-driven insights. Over time, Identity Protection’s machine learning models become more accurate as they observe user behavior patterns, creating a tailored risk-based security framework unique to the organization.
Identity Protection also integrates with other Azure AD security features such as MFA, Conditional Access, passwordless authentication, and continuous access evaluation. This ensures unified risk monitoring across hybrid and cloud environments. The system operates seamlessly regardless of device type, network location, or client application, ensuring that every authentication attempt is evaluated consistently. This comprehensive coverage is essential in today’s distributed work environments, where employees access corporate resources from varied networks and devices.
Organizations leveraging Identity Protection benefit from enhanced threat detection, reduced exposure to compromised credentials, and improved operational efficiency. The adaptive nature of its risk-based policies aligns with zero-trust principles, enforcing verification continuously without disrupting normal operations. By relying on global threat intelligence, behavioral analytics, and automated remediation, Identity Protection provides a powerful layer of defense against modern identity-based attacks.
Because Identity Protection is specifically designed to detect unfamiliar or risky locations, analyze suspicious behaviors, incorporate threat intelligence, and automatically elevate user risk scores, it is unequivocally the correct solution for detecting sign-ins from unfamiliar locations and applying dynamic security responses.
Question 214:
Your company needs to ensure that guest users automatically lose access to resources after a fixed period unless their access is explicitly renewed. Which feature enables this automatic expiration of guest access?
A) Access Packages expiration policies
B) Conditional Access location policies
C) Identity Protection risk levels
D) Privileged Identity Management role settings
Answer: A
Explanation:
Access Packages expiration policies provide a built-in mechanism to ensure that guest users do not retain access indefinitely. These policies allow administrators to define how long a user should keep access to a package before it expires. When the expiration date arrives, the user either loses access automatically or is required to request renewal. This ensures that access rights remain aligned with business needs and that unnecessary or outdated permissions are removed.
The expiration can be set based on a fixed number of days, a recurring review schedule, or tied to external triggers such as the duration of a project. For guests, this function is critical because external users often join temporarily, and uncontrolled access can create long-term security risks. Conditional Access location policies determine access conditions based on geographical location or trusted network boundaries but do not provide expiration or automated deprovisioning of permissions.
These policies only enforce authentication requirements at sign-in and cannot remove resource access or revoke assignments. Identity Protection risk levels classify risky sign-ins or compromised user accounts but do not provide lifecycle management for access. Risk detection triggers remediation actions such as MFA or password resets but does not expire or revoke resource entitlements. Privileged Identity Management role settings allow just-in-time activation, approval workflows, and time-bound elevation of roles, but they govern administrative permissions rather than daily user access to shared corporate resources. Access Packages, part of entitlement management within Identity Governance, allow organizations to bundle various resources into a manageable «package» and apply policies governing how users request access, how approvals work, and how long access should be retained.
They offer automatic expiration, automatic renewal options, and review cycles that ensure external access remains justified. This makes them ideal for project-based or temporary collaboration, where security and compliance require strict control over how long external users maintain entry into corporate systems. Because Access Package expiration policies directly solve the problem of automatically removing guest access after a predetermined time unless renewed, they are the only correct solution.
Question 215:
Your security team wants to reduce the number of standing privileged accounts by providing administrators with time-limited elevation only when needed. Which Azure AD capability supports this approach?
A) Just-in-time access with Privileged Identity Management
B) Self-service group management
C) Conditional Access grant controls
D) Terms of use acceptance policies
Answer: A
Explanation:
Just-in-time access with Privileged Identity Management ensures that administrative roles are not permanently assigned but are activated only when required. This reduces the risk associated with standing privileges, which can be exploited by attackers if an administrator’s credentials are compromised. Privileged Identity Management allows organizations to define activation durations, require multifactor authentication at activation, enforce approval workflows, and require justification or ticket numbers. It also logs all activities, providing a complete audit trail for compliance reporting.
Administrators can elevate their access for the minimum amount of time necessary, aligning with zero-trust principles and least privilege best practices. Self-service group management enables users to request membership in groups for operational access but does not manage administrative privileges or provide temporary elevation of roles. It focuses on department-level or resource-level group assignments rather than privileged administrative roles. Conditional Access grant controls enforce requirements such as MFA, compliant device, or hybrid join during authentication. While granular and powerful, these controls do not provide time-bound administrative elevation or temporary permissions.
They manage sign-in conditions, not privilege lifecycle. Terms of use acceptance policies enforce user consent to organizational terms and agreements before accessing resources. These policies provide legal and compliance assurances but do not control privileged access. Privileged Identity Management is designed for securing elevated roles and offers advanced features such as alerts for privileged role misuse, role assignment reviews, and privileged access dashboards. By eliminating persistent administrator access, organizations significantly reduce their attack surface. Because PIM enables time-bound privilege activation and supports oversight features necessary for secure operations, it is the correct answer.
Question 216:
Your IT department wants a way to automatically trigger onboarding processes such as group assignment, license allocation, and manager notifications when a new employee account is created. What Azure AD feature provides this automation?
A) Lifecycle workflows
B) Conditional Access
C) Multi-tenant organization settings
D) Cross-tenant synchronization
Answer: A
Explanation:
Lifecycle workflows automate identity-related processes based on user lifecycle events such as employee onboarding, role changes, and offboarding. When a new employee account is created, these workflows can automatically assign the appropriate groups, allocate necessary licenses such as Microsoft 365 or security products, send notifications to managers, and trigger other custom tasks. This ensures that employees receive exactly the access they need from the moment they join, reducing operational overhead and improving consistency. Lifecycle workflows can be scheduled, event-driven, or triggered by attribute changes. They also integrate with enterprise HR systems through provisioning configurations, ensuring accurate and automated identity management across the organization.
Conditional Access determines whether a user can access resources based on conditions such as device compliance, risk, or location. It does not perform onboarding tasks or assign licenses. Multi-tenant organization settings facilitate collaboration across multiple Azure AD tenants but do not provide workflow automation for new user accounts. They support cross-tenant trust but not onboarding actions. Cross-tenant synchronization replicates users across tenants for collaboration scenarios but does not automate resource allocation, group membership, or notifications based on user lifecycle events. Lifecycle workflows are part of the broader Identity Governance suite and provide a consistent, automated mechanism to complement provisioning systems. These workflows reduce manual efforts, eliminate human error, and ensure compliance and security policies are applied uniformly. Because lifecycle workflows uniquely automate onboarding tasks and integrate with identity lifecycle events, they are the correct answer.
Question 217:
Your organization wants to ensure that all users are prompted to register security information for MFA during their first login. Which Azure AD feature supports enforcing this requirement?
A) Authentication methods registration policy
B) Conditional Access location policies
C) Access Reviews
D) Privileged Identity Management
Answer: A
Explanation:
Authentication methods registration policies in Azure AD allow administrators to enforce the registration of security information for multi-factor authentication and self-service password reset during a user’s first login. These policies define which authentication methods are required, such as Microsoft Authenticator, phone call, text message, or email, and can require users to register a minimum number of methods for resilience.
By enforcing registration at first login, organizations ensure that all users have the necessary authentication factors in place before accessing corporate resources, strengthening security posture and reducing the likelihood of account compromise. Conditional Access location policies control access based on the geographical location of sign-ins or trusted IP ranges.
They can enforce MFA under specific conditions, but they do not require users to register authentication methods proactively or during initial login. Access Reviews periodically evaluate whether users should retain access to groups, applications, or roles, but they do not mandate MFA registration or enforce initial security setup. Privileged Identity Management governs just-in-time activation for administrative roles and applies MFA requirements during role activation but does not enforce global user registration for MFA during first login. Authentication methods registration policies also support enforcing step-up enrollment, ensuring users complete the necessary setup even if they are accessing resources from a compliant device.
The policies can include end-user guidance and progressive prompts to ensure successful registration while reducing friction. These policies integrate with Identity Protection to consider risk signals and may adapt requirements based on detected threats. By implementing authentication methods registration policies, administrators guarantee that every user is prepared to meet MFA and SSPR requirements, which aligns with zero-trust principles emphasizing strong identity verification. Because this feature specifically enforces MFA method registration at first login for all users, it is the correct solution.
Question 218:
Your security team wants to review the access of external B2B users periodically and remove any unnecessary or expired permissions. Which Azure AD feature supports this activity?
A) Access Reviews
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Conditional Access policies
D) Azure AD Connect
Answer: A
Explanation:
Access Reviews in Azure AD enable organizations to evaluate and validate the access of users, including external B2B guests, to groups, applications, and privileged roles. These reviews can be scheduled periodically, allowing managers, resource owners, or the users themselves to confirm whether the access is still appropriate. Access Reviews help organizations maintain least-privilege principles, reduce exposure from unnecessary access, and comply with regulatory requirements by providing detailed audit logs and reports of review decisions. Privileged Identity Management focuses on managing just-in-time activation of administrative roles and does not directly facilitate the periodic review of B2B users’ access to applications or groups.
It provides oversight for elevated privileges but does not perform membership validation for standard users or external collaborators. Conditional Access policies enforce sign-in requirements, device compliance, or location restrictions but do not provide the functionality to review or remove access on a scheduled basis. They control access dynamically but do not include periodic verification of user permissions. Azure AD Connect synchronizes on-premises identities with Azure AD and manages user attributes and authentication flows but does not enable review of external access or periodic recertification. Access Reviews also allow automatic removal of access for users who fail to respond or whose access is no longer required, helping organizations enforce governance policies without manual intervention.
Administrators can create review campaigns with varying durations and recurrence schedules, such as quarterly or annually, depending on business needs or compliance mandates. Notifications can be sent to reviewers with reminders, and workflows can include approval or rejection actions. The detailed audit trail ensures accountability and provides evidence for regulatory compliance audits. By leveraging Access Reviews, organizations can systematically ensure that external users only retain access that remains necessary, mitigating risks associated with stale or unnecessary permissions. Because this feature specifically addresses the periodic review and removal of access for B2B users, Access Reviews is the correct solution.
Question 219:
Your IT team wants to allow users to request temporary access to specific applications without providing permanent permissions. Which Azure AD feature enables controlled, temporary access?
A) Access Packages with assignment policies
B) Conditional Access MFA policies
C) Privileged Identity Management permanent roles
D) Authentication methods registration policy
Answer: A
Explanation:
Access Packages with assignment policies within Azure AD Entitlement Management provide a structured approach for granting users temporary access to applications, groups, or SharePoint sites without assigning permanent permissions. These packages bundle the resources required for a role or project and define how users request access, how approvals are processed, and how long access is valid. Assignment policies can enforce automatic expiration, recurring review cycles, and conditional approval workflows, ensuring that access is time-bound and aligned with business needs. Conditional Access MFA policies enforce authentication requirements during sign-in or access, but they do not provide temporary or time-limited access to applications.
They control how users authenticate rather than managing the lifecycle or duration of resource access. Privileged Identity Management provides just-in-time activation for administrative roles, but it is specifically focused on elevated roles rather than standard user access to applications. PIM roles are typically elevated and temporary, but they are not designed for application or resource access for non-privileged users.
Authentication methods registration policies enforce MFA method registration and self-service password reset setup but do not manage temporary access to resources. Access Packages offer a full governance framework for temporary access by incorporating policies for expiration, renewal, and approval. Users can request access through a self-service portal, and administrators can enforce justification, approvals, or ticketing requirements.
Automatic expiration and periodic review ensure that temporary access does not convert into standing access, reducing risk and maintaining least-privilege compliance. Access Packages also provide audit logging for compliance, enabling administrators to track who had access, for how long, and what resources were involved. By leveraging Access Packages with assignment policies, organizations can balance operational efficiency with security controls for temporary access requests. Because they directly provide controlled, temporary access to applications without permanent assignments, Access Packages with assignment policies is the correct solution.
Question 220:
Your organization wants to block access to corporate applications from devices that are not compliant with Intune policies. Which Azure AD feature enforces this control?
A) Conditional Access device compliance policies
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Access Reviews
D) Authentication methods registration policy
Answer: A
Explanation:
Conditional Access device compliance policies provide organizations with the ability to enforce access restrictions based on whether a device meets specified security and management standards. Intune-managed devices report their compliance status to Azure AD, which Conditional Access evaluates during the sign-in process. If a device is non-compliant—for example, lacking encryption, missing updates, or not meeting endpoint security policies—access to corporate applications can be blocked or restricted.
This ensures that only devices that are securely configured, managed, and compliant with organizational policies can access sensitive resources. Privileged Identity Management focuses on just-in-time administrative role activation and does not control general device access to applications. PIM governs elevated privileges for administrators, enforcing activation duration, MFA, and approval workflows, but it does not evaluate device compliance or block application access based on device posture. Access Reviews enable administrators to periodically validate user access to groups, roles, or applications, but they operate at the identity level, not the device level.
They are intended for ongoing governance rather than real-time enforcement. Authentication methods registration policies govern the registration of MFA methods and SSPR, ensuring users have necessary authentication factors, but they do not evaluate device compliance. Conditional Access device compliance policies integrate directly with Intune to provide real-time access control based on device posture. Administrators can define policies to block or grant access, require compliant devices for specific applications, and enforce other conditions such as MFA or hybrid join. These policies help enforce zero-trust principles by ensuring that every access attempt is evaluated based on both user identity and device security. They also reduce the risk of data breaches from unmanaged or insecure endpoints. Because this feature specifically enforces application access restrictions based on device compliance, Conditional Access device compliance policies is the correct solution.
Question 221:
Your company wants to enforce MFA for all administrative roles, even if Conditional Access policies are bypassed by low-risk sign-ins. Which Azure AD feature ensures that elevated roles always require MFA?
A) Privileged Identity Management (PIM) activation settings
B) Conditional Access risk policies
C) Access Reviews
D) Lifecycle workflows
Answer: A
Explanation:
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides just-in-time administrative access and enforces authentication requirements, including MFA, for privileged role activation. By configuring activation settings in PIM, organizations ensure that administrators must authenticate using multi-factor authentication every time they activate a role, regardless of other Conditional Access policies that might allow sign-ins based on risk assessment or device compliance. This guarantees strong protection for high-privilege accounts and prevents unauthorized use of elevated roles.
Conditional Access risk policies evaluate sign-ins based on risk signals, such as unfamiliar locations or risky devices, and may enforce MFA depending on risk levels, but they can potentially allow low-risk sign-ins to bypass MFA. This may not provide consistent enforcement for administrative roles. Access Reviews allow organizations to periodically verify access to groups, applications, and privileged roles, but they do not enforce real-time MFA during role activation. Reviews help ensure least privilege over time but cannot require authentication at activation. Lifecycle workflows automate onboarding, offboarding, and access provisioning based on user lifecycle events but do not enforce MFA for privileged role activation.
PIM’s activation settings are specifically designed for privileged roles. Administrators are required to provide justification, complete MFA, and, if configured, obtain approval from designated approvers before roles become active. Activation duration can be limited to minimize exposure, and all events are logged for auditing and compliance purposes. This level of control ensures that privileged roles remain protected even if general access policies are bypassed or compromised. By mandating MFA at role activation, PIM aligns with zero-trust principles and regulatory requirements for administrative security. Because PIM provides this direct enforcement for MFA during elevated role activation, it is the correct solution.
Question 222:
Your organization wants to require that users accessing a SaaS application from unmanaged devices must complete MFA and use app-enforced restrictions such as download blocking. Which Azure AD feature enables this scenario?
A) Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Access Packages
D) Authentication methods policy
Answer: A
Explanation:
Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions allow administrators to enforce security requirements when users access cloud applications from unmanaged devices. These restrictions integrate with Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) to apply session-level controls, such as blocking downloads, limiting printing, and enforcing read-only access in the browser. When a user attempts to access a SaaS application from an unmanaged or non-compliant device,
Conditional Access can trigger multi-factor authentication and apply app-enforced restrictions, ensuring that sensitive data is protected even if the device cannot be fully managed. Privileged Identity Management is focused on administrative role elevation and does not control access to standard SaaS applications or enforce app session restrictions. It governs just-in-time activation of privileged roles, approval workflows, and MFA for elevated accounts, not general user access. Access Packages are used for managing access requests, approvals, and temporary permissions for applications and resources, but they do not enforce session-level restrictions or require MFA for unmanaged devices.
Authentication methods policies manage user registration for MFA and self-service password reset, but they cannot control application sessions or block actions such as downloading from unmanaged devices. Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions provide a way to apply policies at the session level, ensuring that users can authenticate and access resources securely while restricting potentially risky actions based on device state. Administrators can integrate Conditional Access with Microsoft Cloud App Security to extend protection to third-party SaaS applications, providing visibility and control over data exfiltration risks.
These policies enforce zero-trust principles by evaluating both the identity and device context before granting or controlling access. Because Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions provide the exact capability to require MFA and enforce session-level limitations for users on unmanaged devices, it is the correct solution.
Question 223:
Your organization wants to ensure that newly created guest accounts automatically receive access to the correct groups and applications for their project. Which feature supports this automatic provisioning?
A) Access Packages with assignment policies
B) Conditional Access policies
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Lifecycle workflows
Answer: A
Explanation:
Access Packages with assignment policies allow organizations to automatically provision guest users with the correct set of groups, applications, and SharePoint sites based on their role, project, or function. These packages define which resources a user receives access to, how approvals are handled, and how long access is granted. When a new guest account is created, the assignment policy can automatically assign the user to the relevant groups and applications, ensuring that they have immediate access to the resources they need without manual intervention.
Conditional Access policies enforce authentication requirements such as MFA, device compliance, or location-based access, but they do not provision resources or assign group memberships automatically. While Conditional Access can block or allow access based on risk or conditions, it does not perform onboarding or resource allocation tasks. Privileged Identity Management manages just-in-time activation of administrative roles and requires MFA or approval for role elevation, but it does not provision access for standard users or guest accounts to applications or groups. Lifecycle workflows automate onboarding, offboarding, and attribute-based provisioning for internal accounts based on HR triggers, but they are not designed to manage self-service or project-based guest access. Access Packages enable an organization to enforce governance while streamlining collaboration for B2B users.
Administrators can configure automatic assignment rules, expiration dates, and renewal workflows to ensure that guest access aligns with project timelines. Notifications and reminders can be sent to both requestors and approvers to track assignments efficiently. Access Packages also integrate with Access Reviews, allowing periodic evaluation of whether the guest users’ access remains justified, and can automatically remove users whose assignments are no longer needed. This ensures least-privilege access for external collaborators while maintaining security and compliance. Because Access Packages with assignment policies specifically automate resource provisioning for guest accounts in projects, it is the correct solution.
Question 224:
Your company wants to monitor sign-in activity for users with elevated risk and automatically block access if suspicious patterns are detected. Which Azure AD capability should be implemented?
A) Identity Protection risk policies
B) Conditional Access device compliance policies
C) Privileged Identity Management alerts
D) Access Reviews
Answer: A
Explanation:
Identity Protection risk policies provide the capability to monitor sign-in activity for all users and automatically take actions when elevated risk is detected. Risk policies evaluate user sign-ins using machine learning algorithms, threat intelligence, and behavioral analytics to detect suspicious activity such as impossible travel, compromised credentials, or sign-ins from suspicious locations or devices. When a user’s sign-in is flagged as risky, administrators can configure policies to automatically block access, require password reset, or enforce MFA to remediate potential compromise. Conditional Access device compliance policies restrict access based on device state and compliance but do not evaluate user sign-in risk or take automatic action based on suspicious behavior. They enforce access conditions but cannot detect account compromise or respond dynamically to risk signals. Privileged Identity Management alerts notify administrators of privileged role activations or changes but do not evaluate general user sign-ins for risk or automatically block risky accounts.
PIM is focused on administrative accounts and role activation monitoring. Access Reviews evaluate whether users should maintain access to applications or resources on a scheduled basis but do not monitor sign-in behavior or respond in real-time to suspicious activity. Identity Protection risk policies continuously analyze every authentication event, assign risk levels such as low, medium, or high, and can integrate with Conditional Access to enforce automated remediation. This ensures that high-risk sign-ins are blocked immediately, preventing potential account compromise from spreading to corporate resources. Identity Protection also generates detailed reports and dashboards for administrators to review risk events, investigate suspicious sign-ins, and assess user behavior over time. By combining risk detection with automated enforcement, Identity Protection enables organizations to maintain strong security posture without relying solely on reactive measures. This capability is aligned with zero-trust principles, continuously validating trust and mitigating threats dynamically. Because Identity Protection directly monitors sign-in risk and can automatically block access when suspicious patterns are detected, it is the correct solution.
Question 225:
Your organization wants to enforce that all guest users authenticate using MFA and complete identity verification before accessing corporate resources. Which feature provides this enforcement?
A) Conditional Access policies targeting guest users
B) Access Packages expiration policies
C) Privileged Identity Management
D) Authentication methods registration policy
Answer: A
Explanation:
Conditional Access policies targeting guest users allow organizations to enforce strong authentication requirements, including MFA, for external collaborators accessing corporate resources. By applying Conditional Access to guest accounts, administrators can require MFA for all access attempts and ensure that users have verified their identity according to corporate standards before granting entry to applications, SharePoint sites, or Teams channels. This capability allows granular enforcement, including restricting access from untrusted networks, devices, or locations. Access Packages expiration policies manage the duration of access for guest users but do not enforce authentication requirements or identity verification during sign-in.
Expiration policies ensure access is time-bound but cannot require MFA or validate the identity of the guest. Privileged Identity Management governs just-in-time activation of administrative roles and requires MFA during role activation but is focused on internal privileged accounts, not general guest access. Authentication methods registration policies require users to register MFA methods but do not enforce the actual authentication during resource access for guests.
Conditional Access policies for guest users provide a robust and flexible framework for controlling how external collaborators interact with organizational resources. These policies allow administrators to enforce tailored security requirements that apply exclusively to guest accounts—such as partners, vendors, contractors, and B2B collaborators—ensuring that external access adheres to the same standards as internal users without compromising usability. By integrating with Microsoft Cloud App Security (now part of Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps), Conditional Access can apply session controls that extend beyond simple authentication requirements. These include blocking downloads, restricting copy/paste actions, preventing file printing, or enforcing read-only access to sensitive documents. Such granular controls allow organizations to mitigate data leakage risks while still enabling productive collaboration.
Conditional Access policies can further enforce mandatory MFA for all guest users. MFA is essential because external identities often originate from different identity providers or unmanaged environments, which can increase exposure to phishing, credential theft, and unauthorized access. By requiring MFA on every guest sign-in—or only when risk signals are detected—organizations strengthen access security without making the process overly burdensome. Conditional Access can also evaluate sign-in risk, user risk, and device compliance via integration with Azure AD Identity Protection. If an external collaborator attempts to access data from an unusual location, an unknown device, or a risky network, the policy may block access or demand additional verification such as MFA. This ensures that guest access is always validated, contextual, and aligned with real-time security conditions.
Another advantage is the ability to restrict access based on device compliance. Even though guest users typically use their own devices, Conditional Access can require them to use approved browser sessions, app-enforced restrictions, or protected environments like Microsoft Entra’s cross-tenant access settings. This ensures that sensitive data is not accessed from infected, jailbroken, rooted, or otherwise non-compliant devices. Such enforcement directly supports zero-trust principles by ensuring that trust is never assumed, even for partners who frequently collaborate with the organization.
Organizations benefit from enhanced governance, reduced data exposure, and improved security posture by applying Conditional Access policies to guest accounts. These policies ensure that every external user meets MFA, risk-based, and compliance-based requirements before accessing corporate content—something no other feature enforces as comprehensively. Because Conditional Access policies targeting guest users specifically enforce MFA and identity verification while enabling advanced session controls and risk evaluation, they are the correct and most effective solution for securing external access.