Microsoft SC-200 Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q46-60
Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 46 :
Your organization wants to monitor cloud applications for unusual behavior, enforce real-time policies, and prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive corporate data. Which Microsoft solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) designed to provide visibility, control, and threat protection for cloud applications. Organizations increasingly rely on cloud services, which introduces risks of data exfiltration, unauthorized sharing, and insider threats. MCAS addresses these challenges by offering real-time monitoring, policy enforcement, and anomaly detection.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint is focused on device-level threats, such as malware, ransomware, and malicious processes. While it provides endpoint protection, it does not monitor activities inside cloud applications or enforce session-level policies to prevent unauthorized sharing.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors user activity in cloud apps, identifies risky behavior, and applies policies to prevent data exfiltration. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) allows classification of sensitive data and automatic enforcement of protection measures, such as blocking downloads or external sharing. Behavioral analytics detect anomalies like mass downloads, unusual access locations, or unexpected file-sharing patterns. MCAS also provides reporting and auditing for compliance and investigation purposes.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates authentication and sign-in risks but does not monitor activity within cloud applications. It cannot enforce policies that prevent unauthorized file sharing or detect session-level anomalies.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel collects and correlates security events across endpoints, identities, and cloud applications. However, it does not provide the same level of real-time enforcement or session control as MCAS. Sentinel is more suited for incident investigation, alert correlation, and automation rather than real-time activity prevention.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications in use and categorize them as sanctioned or unsanctioned.
Apply session-level policies to control downloads, uploads, and external sharing.
Integrate with MIP labels for automatic classification and protection of sensitive data.
Monitor dashboards and alerts for anomalous activity and policy violations.
Establish workflows for responding to insider threats and exfiltration attempts.
MCAS ensures that sensitive data remains secure in the cloud while providing visibility and compliance enforcement across all user activities, making it the optimal choice for cloud application monitoring. Overview of Cloud Security Challenges
In today’s enterprise environment, cloud applications have become integral to business operations, enabling collaboration, scalability, and remote access. However, this shift introduces significant security challenges. Organizations face risks such as unauthorized access, data leakage, compliance violations, and insider threats. Traditional endpoint security tools or identity-focused solutions cannot provide comprehensive visibility and control over activities occurring directly within cloud applications. This gap necessitates a dedicated solution capable of monitoring user activity, enforcing policies, and detecting anomalies in real time. MCAS is specifically designed to address these concerns, bridging the gap between identity security, device security, and cloud workload protection.
Real-Time Monitoring and Session Control
One of MCAS’s core strengths lies in its ability to monitor cloud sessions in real time. Unlike other tools that focus on device health or authentication events, MCAS observes user behavior directly within cloud apps such as Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and AWS. Real-time session monitoring enables the application of adaptive policies—for example, preventing downloads of sensitive documents when accessing from untrusted networks or blocking file sharing to unsanctioned external users. By controlling user actions dynamically during active sessions, organizations can proactively mitigate data exfiltration attempts rather than merely responding after a security incident occurs.
Data Classification and Protection Integration
MCAS integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Information Protection (MIP), allowing organizations to classify data based on sensitivity and automatically enforce protection measures. For instance, files labeled as “Confidential” can be restricted from being shared externally or downloaded to unmanaged devices. This automated enforcement reduces the reliance on manual security processes and ensures that critical data is consistently protected, even when accessed by a wide range of users across multiple cloud services.
Anomaly Detection and Threat Analytics
Beyond static policies, MCAS leverages behavioral analytics to detect anomalies that may indicate security incidents or insider threats. Examples include unusual mass downloads, logins from unfamiliar locations, or atypical file-sharing patterns. By continuously analyzing user activity, MCAS can trigger alerts or automated actions to contain potential threats. This proactive approach complements traditional security measures, providing a layer of intelligence that addresses risks unique to cloud environments.
Visibility and Compliance Reporting
MCAS offers extensive reporting and auditing capabilities, giving security teams full visibility into user activity and policy compliance. Dashboards summarize key metrics, such as high-risk user behavior, sensitive data usage, and policy violations, while detailed logs support forensic investigations. Organizations in regulated industries benefit from this functionality by demonstrating compliance with frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001. By integrating monitoring, prevention, and reporting into a single platform, MCAS simplifies governance and reduces operational overhead.
Incident Response and Policy Enforcement Workflows
MCAS supports structured workflows for responding to detected threats or policy violations. Security teams can configure automated responses, such as suspending user sessions, notifying administrators, or quarantining suspicious files. These capabilities accelerate incident response, reduce potential data loss, and provide consistency in enforcement across multiple cloud applications.
Overall, Microsoft Cloud App Security addresses the unique security requirements of modern cloud environments. Its combination of real-time session control, data protection integration, anomaly detection, reporting, and automated response makes it the most suitable tool for securing cloud applications. Unlike endpoint protection solutions, identity-focused risk management, or centralized SIEM systems, MCAS directly manages and mitigates risks within the cloud itself, ensuring that sensitive organizational data remains secure while maintaining operational efficiency and compliance.
Question 47 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from ransomware and malware, automatically investigate alerts, and remediate threats without manual intervention. Which Microsoft solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provides enterprise-grade endpoint protection, advanced threat detection, and automated investigation and remediation. The rise of ransomware and malware demonstrates the need for proactive endpoint defense and automated response to minimize operational disruption.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity and enforces policies but does not provide endpoint-specific threat detection or automated remediation for ransomware or malware.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs, correlates events, and automates workflows. It can trigger alerts and initiate actions, but it cannot directly remediate malware or ransomware on endpoints. Sentinel relies on telemetry from solutions like MDE.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects detailed telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, registry changes, and network connections. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine can analyze alerts, contain compromised devices, terminate malicious processes, quarantine files, and restore affected configurations. Advanced hunting enables proactive detection of anomalies and emerging threats. Integration with Sentinel allows enterprise-wide correlation and visibility.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection detects compromised credentials and risky sign-ins but does not monitor endpoints for malware or ransomware.
Implementation steps:
Onboard endpoints to MDE for comprehensive telemetry collection.
Configure AIR for automated investigation and remediation.
Perform advanced hunting to identify unusual activity or emerging threats.
Integrate with Sentinel to correlate endpoint data with identity and cloud events.
Review remediation actions and alerts to refine policies and improve detection accuracy.
MDE ensures rapid detection, automated remediation, and minimal manual intervention, protecting endpoints from ransomware and malware effectively. Enterprise Endpoint Threat Landscape
Modern enterprises face increasingly sophisticated cyber threats targeting endpoints, including desktops, laptops, servers, and mobile devices. Malware, ransomware, and fileless attacks exploit vulnerabilities at the operating system, application, or network level. The rapid adoption of remote work, cloud services, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies has expanded the attack surface, making traditional antivirus solutions insufficient. Organizations require a comprehensive endpoint protection platform capable of detecting, investigating, and remediating threats in real time. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint addresses these needs through advanced threat intelligence, behavioral analytics, and automated response mechanisms.
Advanced Threat Detection
MDE collects granular telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, file activity, network connections, registry modifications, and memory behavior. This telemetry feeds advanced analytics engines that leverage machine learning and global threat intelligence to identify suspicious patterns. The platform can detect known malware signatures as well as unknown, zero-day threats through behavioral analysis. By correlating signals across multiple endpoints and identifying lateral movement attempts, MDE enables organizations to detect threats before they escalate into full-scale incidents.
Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR)
One of MDE’s distinguishing capabilities is its Automated Investigation and Remediation engine. When an alert is generated, AIR automatically investigates the incident, determining the scope and root cause. It can contain affected devices, terminate malicious processes, quarantine files, and restore impacted configurations without requiring manual intervention. This automation significantly reduces the response time, minimizes operational disruption, and ensures consistency in handling threats across large-scale environments. By automating routine remediation tasks, security teams can focus on high-priority threats and strategic security initiatives.
Proactive Threat Hunting
In addition to reactive protection, MDE provides proactive threat hunting capabilities. Security analysts can perform advanced queries on collected telemetry to identify anomalies or potential attack vectors before they result in a compromise. Threat hunting empowers organizations to uncover stealthy, persistent threats and respond proactively. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel enhances this capability by correlating endpoint data with identity, cloud, and network events, providing a holistic view of the threat landscape and enabling faster detection of sophisticated attacks.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem
MDE integrates seamlessly with the broader Microsoft security ecosystem, including Microsoft Sentinel, Azure AD, and Microsoft Cloud App Security. Integration with Sentinel allows organizations to centralize security alerts, automate workflows, and gain enterprise-wide visibility. Correlation with identity and cloud data improves detection accuracy and contextual understanding of incidents. MDE’s compatibility with other Microsoft 365 Defender services ensures a coordinated defense strategy, linking endpoint protection with identity security, email, and cloud app protection.
Continuous Improvement and Policy Management
MDE enables continuous improvement through actionable insights and reporting. Administrators can review remediation actions, identify recurring patterns, and refine policies to improve detection and response accuracy. Customizable alert thresholds and response actions allow organizations to balance security and operational efficiency. Regular updates to the threat intelligence database and AI-driven detection models ensure that endpoints remain protected against evolving threats.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive solution that goes beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. By combining advanced telemetry collection, automated investigation and remediation, proactive threat hunting, and deep integration with the Microsoft security ecosystem, MDE ensures rapid detection and mitigation of ransomware, malware, and other endpoint threats. Its automation reduces manual effort, accelerates incident response, and strengthens an organization’s overall security posture, making it the optimal choice for enterprise-grade endpoint protection.
Question 48 :
Your organization wants to detect compromised user accounts, risky sign-ins, and enforce risk-based access policies automatically. Which Microsoft solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: C) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to detect identity-based threats and enforce automated risk-based access policies to prevent unauthorized access. Identity compromise is a critical risk because it allows attackers to access sensitive resources and escalate privileges.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints from malware and suspicious activity but does not monitor authentication or enforce risk-based access policies.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel can detect identity threats through log correlation, but it does not natively enforce risk-based access policies. Automated policy enforcement requires custom playbooks.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates user and sign-in risk using machine learning and threat intelligence. Conditional Access policies can automatically enforce MFA, block high-risk users, or require password resets. Dashboards provide insights into risk trends and high-risk users, enabling security teams to prioritize investigations and remediation.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity and detects anomalies, but it does not enforce access policies based on authentication risk.
Implementation steps:
Configure risk detection policies for user sign-ins and behavior.
Integrate Conditional Access to enforce risk-based policies automatically.
Monitor dashboards to prioritize high-risk users for investigation.
Deploy MFA and user training programs to enhance identity security.
Continuously refine policies to adapt to emerging threats and attack vectors.
Identity Protection ensures proactive, automated risk-based enforcement, reducing the likelihood of account compromise and unauthorized access.
Question 49 :
Your organization wants to aggregate security events from endpoints, cloud applications, and identities, perform threat hunting, and automate incident response. Which Microsoft solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform that enables centralized threat detection, investigation, and automated response. Organizations require centralized visibility to detect complex threats across endpoints, cloud apps, and identities.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity and enforces session policies but does not provide centralized event aggregation, correlation, or automated enterprise-wide incident response.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel collects logs from endpoints, cloud apps, and identities, applying analytics to detect anomalies and threats. Advanced threat hunting is possible using KQL queries, and automated responses can be implemented through playbooks. Playbooks can isolate endpoints, disable compromised accounts, notify teams, and create ITSM tickets. Dashboards provide real-time visibility into incidents, enabling proactive security operations.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on authentication and risk-based access. It cannot aggregate security events from multiple domains or automate enterprise-wide incident response.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints and provides telemetry, but cannot perform centralized threat hunting or SOAR capabilities independently. Integration with Sentinel is required for full enterprise-wide incident management.
Implementation steps:
Connect all relevant data sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules to detect anomalies and correlate events.
Develop dashboards for real-time visibility and reporting.
Build playbooks to automate responses to common incident types.
Conduct regular threat hunting to identify hidden or emerging threats.
Sentinel provides comprehensive, enterprise-wide threat detection and response capabilities by combining SIEM and SOAR functionalities.
Question 50 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables. Which Microsoft solution and feature should you implement?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) prevent high-risk behaviors that could lead to ransomware or malware infection. ASR rules are behavior-based, blocking untrusted scripts, macros, and executables proactively, unlike signature-based antivirus solutions.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is reactive and signature-based. It does not proactively block risky scripts or macros, nor does it provide behavior-based prevention for zero-day threats.
Option B – MDE with ASR rules: ASR rules block high-risk behaviors like executing macros from email attachments, scripts from temporary folders, or untrusted executables. Integrated with MDE, ASR rules provide alerting, telemetry, and automated remediation, minimizing attack surface and preventing ransomware propagation.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on authentication and risky sign-ins. It does not protect endpoints from ransomware or malware execution.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud app activity and enforces data protection policies, but cannot control execution of scripts or malware on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to reduce false positives.
Deploy rules gradually across endpoints, monitoring for user impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows to isolate threats promptly.
Review alerts and telemetry to refine ASR policies.
Educate users on safe practices to complement technical protections.
MDE with ASR rules provides proactive, behavior-based endpoint protection, reducing ransomware and malware risk while maintaining productivity and operational efficiency.
Question 51 :
Your organization wants to monitor cloud applications for suspicious activity, prevent unauthorized data sharing, and ensure compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements. Which Microsoft solution is most appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that provides visibility, control, and protection across cloud applications. With the growing adoption of SaaS applications, insider threats, accidental data leaks, and unauthorized access have become significant risks. MCAS addresses these concerns through real-time monitoring, behavioral analytics, and policy enforcement.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: This solution protects endpoints from malware, ransomware, and other attacks. While it is highly effective at safeguarding devices, it does not provide activity monitoring or session-level controls within cloud applications. As a result, it cannot prevent sensitive data from being exfiltrated through SaaS platforms.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS enables organizations to discover all cloud applications in use, classify them as sanctioned or unsanctioned, and apply policies to control data movement. Through integration with Microsoft Information Protection, sensitive data can be labeled and automatically protected. Behavioral analytics help identify anomalies such as unusual download patterns, suspicious access locations, or mass sharing of sensitive files. MCAS provides comprehensive dashboards, alerting, and audit logs to meet compliance and regulatory requirements, allowing rapid investigation and remediation of incidents.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on authentication risk, detecting compromised credentials, and enforcing conditional access based on sign-in risk. While it is critical for identity security, it does not monitor cloud application activity or enforce real-time policies for preventing data leaks.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform designed to aggregate security events and automate responses. While it can analyze cloud application telemetry when integrated with MCAS, it does not provide the same level of real-time session control, anomaly detection, or enforcement capabilities.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications in use and categorize them for risk assessment.
Apply session policies to prevent risky downloads, sharing, and uploads.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection to classify and protect sensitive files automatically.
Monitor activity and alerts to detect insider threats or policy violations
Develop workflows for rapid incident response and compliance reporting.
MCAS ensures that sensitive data remains secure in cloud applications while enabling organizations to maintain visibility, compliance, and control.
Question 52 :
Your organization needs to protect endpoints from ransomware and malware, automatically investigate alerts, and remediate threats without manual intervention. Which Microsoft solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) is a comprehensive enterprise endpoint security platform that provides advanced threat detection, automated investigation, and remediation. With the rising frequency of ransomware attacks, automated endpoint protection is essential for minimizing operational impact and maintaining business continuity.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS focuses on monitoring cloud application activity and enforcing data protection policies. While critical for cloud security, it does not provide endpoint-specific malware detection or automatic remediation of ransomware attacks.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs, applies analytics, and can trigger automated workflows. However, it does not directly remediate malware or ransomware on endpoints; it relies on telemetry from MDE or other endpoint solutions to initiate actions.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE provides continuous endpoint telemetry, including process execution, network connections, and registry activity. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine analyzes alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, quarantines files, and restores system configurations. Advanced hunting queries allow proactive detection of suspicious behavior, lateral movement, and emerging threats. Integration with Sentinel provides a centralized view and enables coordinated enterprise-wide response.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on risky sign-ins and compromised accounts, without providing malware or ransomware protection at the endpoint level.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for comprehensive monitoring.
Configure the AIR engine for automated investigation and remediation.
Use advanced hunting to identify anomalies or potential threats proactively.
Integrate MDE with Sentinel to correlate endpoint telemetry with cloud and identity events.
Regularly review alert outcomes and remediation actions to optimize policy settings.
Deploying MDE ensures proactive detection, automated response, and effective mitigation of ransomware and malware, reducing operational burden and response times.
Question 53 :
Your organization wants to detect compromised accounts, risky sign-ins, and enforce risk-based access policies automatically across all users. Which Microsoft solution is appropriate?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: C) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to monitor, detect, and respond to identity-based threats. Compromised credentials are a common vector for attackers to gain unauthorized access to corporate resources, escalate privileges, and exfiltrate sensitive information. Identity Protection mitigates this risk by evaluating user and sign-in activity, calculating risk scores, and enforcing conditional access policies automatically.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints against malware and suspicious activity but does not monitor authentication events or enforce risk-based access policies for compromised accounts.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel can aggregate logs and detect identity-related threats, but does not natively enforce risk-based access policies. Automated enforcement would require custom playbooks and additional integration.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection leverages machine learning and threat intelligence to identify risky sign-ins and users. Integration with Conditional Access allows automated responses: medium-risk users can be prompted for multi-factor authentication (MFA), high-risk users can be blocked or forced to reset passwords, and suspicious sessions can be restricted. Dashboards provide insight into trends, enabling security teams to prioritize remediation efforts effectively.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications and detects anomalous behavior, but cannot enforce authentication or access policies based on identity risk.
Implementation steps:
Configure risk detection policies for user sign-ins and account activity.
Integrate Conditional Access to enforce automated risk-based access controls.
Monitor dashboards to identify high-risk accounts for investigation
Deploy MFA and user training programs to strengthen identity security.
Continuously refine policies based on emerging threats and organizational risk appetite.
Azure AD Identity Protection ensures proactive, automated risk-based enforcement, preventing account compromise and unauthorized access while reducing manual intervention.
Question 54 :
Your organization wants centralized visibility across endpoints, cloud apps, and identity, to perform threat hunting and to automate incident response. Which Microsoft solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platform. It enables centralized monitoring, analytics, proactive threat hunting, and automated response across endpoints, cloud applications, and identity systems. Sentinel is essential for organizations seeking a holistic, enterprise-wide security monitoring solution.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud app activity, detects anomalies, and enforces session policies. It does not provide centralized SIEM capabilities, threat hunting, or automated enterprise-wide incident response.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs from endpoints, identities, and cloud applications, applying analytics and correlation rules to detect anomalies and complex threats. Threat hunting is enabled through Kusto Query Language (KQL) for proactive detection of patterns indicative of attacks. Automated response is achieved using playbooks built on Azure Logic Apps, allowing rapid containment of threats, disabling compromised accounts, isolating endpoints, or creating ITSM tickets. Dashboards and reporting provide visibility into incident trends, compliance status, and ongoing investigations.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses solely on identity risk. It does not provide centralized aggregation of security events or enterprise-wide automation of responses.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints and provides telemetry, but it cannot perform enterprise-wide SIEM or SOAR functions independently. Integration with Sentinel is required for full visibility and orchestration.
Implementation steps:
Connect all relevant endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules to detect suspicious activity and correlate events.
Develop dashboards for real-time visibility and incident reporting.
Build automated response playbooks for common incident scenarios.
Conduct periodic threat hunting exercises to identify hidden or emerging threats.
Sentinel provides a unified, enterprise-wide security operations solution, combining SIEM and SOAR capabilities for proactive threat detection and rapid response.
Question 55 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting the execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables. Which Microsoft solution and feature should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) proactively block high-risk behaviors on endpoints that could lead to malware or ransomware infection. ASR rules are behavior-based, restricting execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables to prevent attacks before they execute.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is reactive and signature-based. While it protects against known malware, it does not proactively block risky behaviors or zero-day attacks effectively.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules prevent risky behaviors, including running macros from email attachments, executing scripts from temporary folders, or opening untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. These capabilities reduce the attack surface, prevent ransomware propagation, and allow security teams to respond quickly to threats while minimizing disruption.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Focuses on authentication and risky sign-ins; it does not protect endpoints against malware or ransomware execution.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: Monitors cloud app activity and enforces data protection policies, but cannot block malware execution on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across endpoints while monitoring impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows to isolate or remediate detected threats.
Review alerts and telemetry to optimize ASR policies.
Educate users about safe practices to complement technical protections.
MDE with ASR rules provides proactive, behavior-based endpoint protection, reducing ransomware and malware risk while maintaining productivity.
Question 56 :
Your organization wants to detect insider threats and suspicious activity in cloud applications while enforcing real-time data protection policies to prevent sensitive information leakage. Which Microsoft solution should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) solution that provides visibility, control, and threat protection for cloud applications. Insider threats, accidental data leaks, and risky user behavior are major challenges for modern organizations, especially as employees increasingly access SaaS applications from diverse locations and devices. MCAS addresses these challenges through real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, and policy enforcement.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint focuses on endpoint-level threats, such as malware, ransomware, and suspicious processes. While critical for endpoint security, it cannot monitor or control user activity within cloud applications or enforce session-level policies.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS discovers all cloud applications in use, classifying them as sanctioned or unsanctioned, and applies policies to prevent data exfiltration. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables automatic classification and enforcement of sensitive data policies. Behavioral analytics detect unusual activity, such as mass file downloads, access from new geographic locations, or excessive sharing, which may indicate insider threats or compromised accounts. Alerts and dashboards provide actionable insights and reporting for compliance, investigation, and response.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates authentication risk and detects compromised credentials, enforcing conditional access policies. It does not monitor application activity or prevent real-time data leaks within cloud services.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates logs and correlates events from multiple sources. While it can analyze cloud activity when integrated with MCAS, it lacks real-time session-level enforcement, making it unsuitable for preventing insider-driven data leaks proactively.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications and assess associated risk.
Apply session-level policies to block risky activities, such as unauthorized downloads or sharing.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection to classify and enforce protection for sensitive data.
Monitor dashboards and alerts to identify anomalous behavior and respond quickly.
Develop incident response workflows to investigate and remediate insider threats efficiently.
MCAS ensures cloud data security while maintaining compliance and proactive detection of insider threats, making it the ideal solution for organizations seeking granular control over cloud application activity.
Question 57 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from malware, ransomware, and fileless attacks while enabling automated investigation and remediation without manual intervention. Which solution should you implement?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provides enterprise-grade endpoint protection, including advanced threat detection, automated investigation, and remediation capabilities. With the increasing sophistication of ransomware and malware attacks, automated endpoint protection is critical for maintaining operational continuity and reducing incident response times.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications and enforces data protection policies. It does not provide endpoint-specific threat detection or automated remediation for ransomware or malware.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform that aggregates logs, applies analytics, and can trigger automated playbooks. However, it does not directly remediate malware or ransomware on endpoints; it relies on telemetry from solutions like MDE for automated actions.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects endpoint telemetry, including process execution, registry changes, and network activity. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine analyzes alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, quarantines files, and restores configurations. Advanced hunting queries allow proactive detection of anomalous behaviors and emerging threats. Integration with Sentinel provides centralized enterprise visibility and orchestration for comprehensive security operations.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection monitors sign-ins and authentication risk, but it does not provide endpoint-level malware or ransomware protection.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Configure the AIR engine to automatically investigate and remediate alerts.
Utilize advanced hunting queries to proactively identify potential threats and anomalies.
Integrate MDE with Sentinel for enterprise-wide correlation and centralized visibility.
Continuously evaluate remediation outcomes and refine policies for accuracy and efficiency.
Deploying MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated investigation, and rapid remediation of malware and ransomware, minimizing operational disruption.
Question 58 :
Your organization needs to identify compromised accounts, detect risky sign-ins, and enforce risk-based access policies automatically. Which Microsoft solution is most suitable?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: C) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is designed to detect and respond to identity-based risks. Compromised credentials are one of the most common attack vectors, potentially enabling attackers to access sensitive information or escalate privileges. Identity Protection mitigates these risks by evaluating user and sign-in behavior and applying risk-based conditional access policies automatically.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints from malware and ransomware but does not monitor sign-ins or enforce risk-based access policies.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel can aggregate identity logs and detect anomalous activity, but automated enforcement of risk-based access requires integration with Conditional Access and custom playbooks.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection uses machine learning and global threat intelligence to assess the risk level of users and sign-ins. Integration with Conditional Access enables automated enforcement, including requiring MFA for medium-risk users, blocking high-risk users, and prompting for password resets. Dashboards provide insights for security teams to investigate high-risk accounts and monitor trends over time.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity and identifies anomalies, but cannot enforce authentication or risk-based access policies at the identity level.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for user sign-ins and accounts.
Implement Conditional Access policies for automated enforcement based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards to identify high-risk users and investigate suspicious activity.
Deploy MFA and provide user training to strengthen identity security.
Refine risk policies continuously based on emerging threats and organizational needs.
Identity Protection ensures proactive, automated enforcement of risk-based access controls, reducing the likelihood of account compromise and unauthorized access.
Question 59 :
Your organization wants centralized monitoring of security events from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity systems to perform proactive threat hunting and automate incident response. Which Microsoft solution is best suited?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR solution that provides centralized visibility, advanced analytics, proactive threat hunting, and automated incident response across the entire enterprise. Modern enterprises require centralized security operations to detect sophisticated threats across endpoints, cloud applications, and identities.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud application activity, detects anomalies, and enforces session policies. However, it does not provide centralized SIEM or SOAR functionality for enterprise-wide threat correlation or automated response.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel collects logs and telemetry from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity systems, applying analytics rules to detect anomalies and complex threats. Threat hunting is supported via Kusto Query Language (KQL) for advanced analysis. Automated response is enabled through playbooks built on Azure Logic Apps, allowing actions such as isolating endpoints, disabling compromised accounts, or notifying teams. Dashboards offer visibility into incidents, compliance, and trends, supporting proactive security operations.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection monitors identity risks but does not provide centralized monitoring, threat hunting, or automated response across multiple domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints and provides telemetry, but it does not aggregate cross-domain logs, perform enterprise-wide correlation, or enable SOAR functionality independently.
Implementation steps:
Connect all relevant data sources to Sentinel for centralized monitoring.
Configure analytics rules to detect anomalies and correlate events across domains.
Develop dashboards for real-time visibility and reporting.
Build automated playbooks for common incident response scenarios.
Conduct threat hunting exercises to identify hidden or emerging threats proactively.
Sentinel provides a comprehensive solution for enterprise security operations, combining SIEM and SOAR capabilities to enable proactive detection and automated response across endpoints, identities, and cloud applications.
Question 60 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by restricting execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables. Which Microsoft solution and feature should you deploy?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint proactively block high-risk behaviors that could lead to malware or ransomware infection. Unlike signature-based antivirus solutions, ASR rules are behavior-based, preventing execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables to stop attacks before they can compromise the system.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is reactive and primarily signature-based. While effective against known malware, it cannot prevent zero-day threats or proactively block risky behaviors.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules prevent high-risk behaviors such as running macros from email attachments, executing scripts from temporary directories, or opening untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides alerting, telemetry, and automated remediation, reducing the attack surface and preventing ransomware propagation.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Focuses on identity risk and sign-ins but does not protect endpoints against ransomware or malware execution.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: Monitors cloud applications and enforces data protection policies, but cannot restrict malware or ransomware execution on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to reduce false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across endpoints, monitoring for user impact.
Configure automated remediation workflows to isolate or remediate threats promptly.
Review alerts and telemetry continuously to optimize ASR policies.
Educate users about safe practices to complement technical protections.
MDE with ASR rules provides behavior-based, proactive endpoint protection, reducing ransomware and malware risk while maintaining operational productivity.