Microsoft SC-200 Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 12 Q166-180
Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 166 :
Your organization wants to detect and prevent exfiltration of sensitive files from cloud applications while monitoring for anomalous user behavior. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides a cloud-native security solution for monitoring, controlling, and protecting cloud applications. Data exfiltration—whether accidental or malicious—is a critical risk in cloud environments, particularly when employees use unsanctioned apps or share sensitive files externally. MCAS addresses this risk through real-time monitoring, behavioral analytics, and policy enforcement, allowing organizations to detect anomalous user behavior and prevent sensitive data leakage.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint protects devices from malware, ransomware, and endpoint threats, but does not monitor or control cloud app activity.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS continuously monitors cloud applications for risky activity, such as bulk downloads, unusual file sharing, and access from unfamiliar locations. Behavioral analytics uses machine learning to detect anomalies in user behavior, including potential insider threats or compromised accounts. Policies can block high-risk activities, require re-authentication, or restrict data transfer. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables automatic labeling and protection of sensitive files. Administrators can generate detailed alerts and reports, enabling rapid incident response. Continuous monitoring ensures organizations maintain visibility over cloud applications, enforce security policies, and comply with regulatory requirements. By combining discovery, detection, and enforcement, MCAS prevents data exfiltration, mitigates insider threats, and strengthens overall security posture.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection detects risky sign-ins and compromised accounts but does not monitor user activity within cloud applications or prevent data exfiltration.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates security data and orchestrates responses, but requires integration with MCAS to detect cloud-specific threats and prevent exfiltration.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications used across the organization.
Classify applications by risk level and enforce access policies accordingly.
Configure policies to detect anomalous file activity and prevent data exfiltration.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection for automatic labeling and protection of sensitive files.
Monitor dashboards, investigate alerts, and refine policies to ensure adaptive protection.
Deploying MCAS ensures visibility into cloud applications, proactive detection of anomalous user behavior, and enforcement of policies to prevent exfiltration of sensitive data. Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that provides comprehensive visibility, control, and protection over an organization’s cloud applications. In today’s cloud-first environments, organizations increasingly rely on Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications for collaboration, productivity, and data storage. While this shift improves flexibility and efficiency, it also introduces significant security challenges, particularly concerning data exfiltration, unauthorized access, and insider threats. MCAS addresses these challenges by combining continuous monitoring, behavioral analytics, and policy enforcement to safeguard sensitive organizational data and maintain regulatory compliance.
At its core, MCAS enables organizations to discover all cloud applications in use across the enterprise, including sanctioned and unsanctioned apps. Shadow IT—applications that employees use without organizational approval—is a significant risk because these applications often lack enterprise-grade security controls. By continuously scanning network traffic and user activity, MCAS identifies all applications interacting with corporate data, categorizes them based on risk, and provides administrators with actionable insights to manage or block risky applications. This discovery capability is critical for reducing exposure and ensuring that only approved, secure cloud applications are in use.
MCAS also monitors user activities within cloud applications in real time. It employs advanced behavioral analytics and machine learning algorithms to detect anomalies, such as unusual login patterns, bulk downloads, or access from unfamiliar locations. For instance, if an employee suddenly downloads a large number of sensitive documents from a cloud storage service or attempts to share confidential files externally, MCAS can automatically trigger alerts or enforce predefined policies. These policies can include requiring multi-factor authentication, restricting access, quarantining sensitive files, or blocking specific actions entirely. By identifying potentially malicious behavior early, organizations can prevent data exfiltration and mitigate risks associated with insider threats or compromised accounts.
Another important aspect of MCAS is its integration with Microsoft Information Protection (MIP). This integration allows the platform to automatically apply sensitivity labels and encryption to files based on their content and context. For example, documents classified as highly confidential can be automatically protected when uploaded to the cloud, shared externally, or accessed from unmanaged devices. This capability ensures that sensitive data remains secure even when it leaves the corporate network, complementing the monitoring and policy enforcement functions of MCAS. Furthermore, it reduces the risk of human error by automating protection measures, which is essential in environments where employees frequently interact with multiple cloud applications and large volumes of data.
MCAS also supports compliance and audit requirements by providing detailed reporting and alerting mechanisms. Administrators can access comprehensive dashboards that summarize activity patterns, policy violations, and security incidents. This visibility enables organizations to respond quickly to threats, demonstrate compliance with industry regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO standards, and make informed decisions about cloud security strategies. The platform’s reporting capabilities also support proactive risk management, allowing organizations to identify recurring issues, monitor trends, and continuously refine security policies.
In addition to threat detection and data protection, MCAS facilitates automated threat response through integration with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Microsoft Sentinel. While MCAS is focused on cloud application security, it can provide valuable signals to Sentinel for correlating cloud-specific threats with endpoint or network data, enhancing overall security intelligence. This interoperability allows organizations to create cohesive, automated security workflows that respond to incidents quickly and accurately, reducing the burden on security operations teams.
MCAS is particularly effective in addressing insider threats, which remain a major cause of data breaches. By continuously analyzing user behavior and enforcing granular access policies, MCAS reduces the likelihood of malicious or accidental data leakage. It can detect patterns such as multiple failed login attempts, unusual access times, or atypical sharing behavior and take immediate action to protect data. This proactive approach is essential in modern organizations, where employees often work remotely, use personal devices, or collaborate across multiple cloud platforms.
Finally, MCAS provides a scalable solution for organizations of all sizes. Its cloud-native architecture allows it to adapt to changing business needs and seamlessly integrate with existing IT infrastructure. Organizations can deploy policies incrementally, monitor cloud activity without impacting user productivity, and extend protection across multiple SaaS applications, whether they are part of the Microsoft ecosystem or third-party solutions. This flexibility ensures that security measures keep pace with the rapid adoption of cloud technologies while maintaining a strong security posture.
In conclusion, Microsoft Cloud App Security is the most suitable solution for preventing data exfiltration, controlling cloud application usage, and detecting anomalous user behavior. Unlike Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which focuses on endpoint threats, or Azure AD Identity Protection, which addresses identity risks, MCAS provides specialized, continuous monitoring and enforcement capabilities for cloud applications. Its advanced behavioral analytics, policy automation, integration with Microsoft Information Protection, and interoperability with broader security solutions make it a comprehensive platform for mitigating cloud-related risks, safeguarding sensitive data, and enhancing overall organizational security. By implementing MCAS, organizations gain real-time visibility into cloud activity, prevent unauthorized data transfers, and maintain regulatory compliance, all of which are critical in today’s increasingly complex cloud environments.
Question 167 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from ransomware by preventing execution of untrusted applications, scripts, and macros. Which solution and feature should be implemented?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provide proactive, behavior-based protection against ransomware and malware. Many ransomware infections originate from high-risk actions, such as opening email attachments with macros, running untrusted scripts, or executing applications from temporary directories. ASR rules prevent these actions, reducing the attack surface on endpoints and mitigating ransomware risk.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is signature-based, offering reactive protection with limited ability to block zero-day attacks or risky behaviors.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules block high-risk execution paths, such as macros, scripts, and untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. Phased deployment reduces false positives, while continuous monitoring ensures operational continuity. ASR rules prevent ransomware propagation, minimize endpoint compromise, and improve overall security posture. They also support reporting and auditing, enabling security teams to validate protection effectiveness and compliance with organizational policies.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on authentication risks and does not control endpoint execution of risky files.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS secures cloud applications but does not control the execution of applications or scripts on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize operational impact.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across all endpoints.
Configure automated remediation for detected violations.
Monitor alerts and refine rules based on operational experience.
Educate users on safe computing practices to complement technical protections.
Deploying MDE with ASR rules ensures proactive endpoint protection against ransomware, reducing risk while maintaining operational efficiency. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules is designed to provide proactive, behavior-based security that goes beyond traditional signature-based antivirus solutions. While conventional antivirus tools rely primarily on identifying known malware signatures, ASR rules focus on blocking high-risk actions that are commonly exploited by ransomware, malware, and other advanced threats. These high-risk actions include executing untrusted scripts, opening email attachments with embedded macros, launching applications from temporary or suspicious directories, and other behaviors that malware typically uses to infiltrate endpoints. By preventing these actions before malicious code executes, ASR rules reduce the attack surface of endpoints and limit opportunities for attackers to compromise systems.
ASR rules operate as part of a broader, integrated security platform within MDE, providing not only prevention but also continuous monitoring, alerting, and automated remediation. Telemetry collected from endpoints allows security teams to detect attempted violations of ASR policies in real time, investigate suspicious activity, and take corrective measures before any significant damage occurs. This proactive approach is especially effective against ransomware, which often relies on user interaction and predictable attack patterns to encrypt files. Blocking these attack vectors at the source helps contain threats and minimizes operational disruption.
Deployment of ASR rules can be phased to reduce false positives while ensuring critical protections remain in place. Administrators can selectively enable rules based on risk levels, endpoint role, or user behavior, allowing organizations to balance security with usability. Detailed reporting and auditing capabilities further enable security teams to validate that endpoints are adequately protected, assess the effectiveness of the implemented rules, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory standards.
Unlike traditional antivirus software, which primarily reacts to threats after they are detected, ASR rules within Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provide a preventative, behavior-focused approach that strengthens overall endpoint security, limits ransomware propagation, and enhances the organization’s security posture across all connected devices. This combination of proactive blocking, monitoring, and integration with broader endpoint protection features makes ASR-enabled MDE the optimal choice for mitigating ransomware and advanced malware threats.
Option A, Microsoft Defender Antivirus, offers reactive signature-based protection and is less effective against zero-day threats or sophisticated ransomware. Option C, Azure AD Identity Protection, focuses on identity-related risks and risky sign-ins rather than endpoint behavior. Option D, Microsoft Cloud App Security, provides visibility and control over cloud applications but does not protect endpoints from local ransomware execution or risky actions.
By implementing ASR rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, organizations gain a comprehensive mechanism to preemptively block malicious behavior, strengthen endpoint resilience, and reduce the overall likelihood of successful ransomware or malware attacks.
Question 168 :
Your organization wants to detect risky sign-ins, compromised credentials, and enforce multi-factor authentication automatically. Which solution should be implemented?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates user accounts and sign-ins for risk using behavioral analytics, machine learning, and Microsoft threat intelligence. Compromised credentials are a leading cause of breaches, making real-time detection and automated mitigation essential. Identity Protection enforces adaptive authentication policies to prevent unauthorized access.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint protects devices but does not evaluate sign-in risks or enforce adaptive authentication.
Option B – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection analyzes sign-in anomalies, impossible travel events, and credential exposure. It assigns risk levels and integrates with Conditional Access to automatically enforce multi-factor authentication for medium-risk users or block access for high-risk users. Dashboards provide actionable insights for investigation and remediation. Automation reduces response time and operational overhead, improving security posture. Reporting supports regulatory compliance and internal auditing.
Option C – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not enforce adaptive authentication policies based on sign-in risk.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel provides centralized monitoring but requires integration with Identity Protection to enforce risk-based adaptive authentication.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for user accounts and sign-ins.
Configure Conditional Access policies to enforce MFA or block access based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards and investigate high-risk sign-ins.
Remediate compromised accounts promptly.
Refine risk policies regularly to adapt to emerging threats.
Deploying Azure AD Identity Protection ensures proactive detection and mitigation of identity risks, preventing unauthorized access and strengthening overall security posture.
Question 169 :
Your organization wants to centralize monitoring, threat hunting, and automated incident response across endpoints, cloud applications, and identities. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform providing centralized security monitoring, threat detection, threat hunting, and automated response across all organizational domains. Modern enterprises require a unified platform to detect, investigate, and respond to threats across endpoints, cloud applications, and identity systems.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS provides monitoring and policy enforcement for cloud apps but does not offer enterprise-wide SIEM, threat hunting, or orchestration.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel collects telemetry from endpoints, cloud applications, and identities. Analytics rules detect anomalies, correlate events, and generate actionable alerts. Threat hunting with Kusto Query Language (KQL) enables proactive detection of hidden threats. Automated playbooks orchestrate responses, such as isolating compromised devices, disabling accounts, or notifying security teams. Dashboards provide operational visibility, compliance reporting, and incident management. Sentinel enables organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to security threats efficiently, improving security posture and operational resilience.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates sign-in risk but does not provide centralized SIEM or orchestration across multiple domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE secures endpoints but does not independently provide enterprise-wide monitoring or threat hunting.
Implementation steps:
Connect telemetry from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules for anomaly detection and event correlation.
Develop dashboards for operational monitoring and compliance reporting.
Create automated playbooks for incident response orchestration.
Conduct proactive threat hunting to refine policies and detect emerging threats.
Deploying Sentinel centralizes security operations, enhancing detection, investigation, and automated response across organizational security domains.
Question 170 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by controlling the execution of high-risk macros, scripts, and untrusted applications. Which solution and feature should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provide proactive, behavior-based protection against ransomware and malware. ASR prevents execution of high-risk macros, scripts, and untrusted executables, addressing common attack vectors on endpoints.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is signature-based and reactive, offering limited protection against zero-day or behavior-based threats.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules block execution of risky scripts, macros, and untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. Gradual deployment reduces false positives, and continuous monitoring ensures optimal protection without disrupting operations. ASR rules significantly reduce ransomware propagation, prevent malware execution, and improve endpoint security posture while maintaining operational efficiency.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection addresses authentication risks but does not control malware execution on endpoints.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS secures cloud applications but cannot enforce execution restrictions on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize false positives.
Gradually deploy ASR rules across all endpoints.
Configure automated remediation for detected violations.
Monitor alerts and refine rules as necessary.
Educate users on safe computing practices to complement technical protections.
Deploying MDE with ASR rules ensures proactive protection against ransomware and malware, reducing risk while maintaining operational efficiency.
Question 171 :
Your organization wants to detect insider threats and prevent data exfiltration across cloud applications. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is a cloud-native security solution designed to monitor and protect cloud applications against insider threats, accidental data leaks, and compromised accounts. Insider threats, whether malicious or unintentional, pose significant risks, including data theft, regulatory non-compliance, and financial losses. MCAS provides visibility into cloud app usage, behavioral analytics to detect anomalies, and enforcement of security policies to prevent data exfiltration.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint secures endpoints against malware and ransomware but does not provide cloud application activity monitoring or detect insider threats.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS discovers all cloud applications in use, classifies them by risk, and monitors user activity for anomalies such as excessive downloads, unusual sharing, or access from suspicious locations. Policies can block risky activities, restrict sharing, and enforce re-authentication. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables automatic labeling and protection of sensitive data, ensuring compliance. Alerts provide actionable insights for security teams, enabling rapid investigation and response. Continuous monitoring allows organizations to adapt policies as cloud usage evolves, mitigating insider threats effectively.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection detects risky sign-ins and compromised accounts but does not analyze user activity within cloud applications or prevent data exfiltration.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates security telemetry and orchestrates incident response, but requires integration with MCAS to detect insider threats in cloud applications.
Implementation steps:
Discover all cloud applications in use across the organization.
Assess application risk and implement policies to restrict high-risk actions.
Enable behavioral analytics to detect anomalous activity indicative of insider threats.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection to automatically label and protect sensitive data.
Monitor alerts and dashboards to investigate suspicious activities and refine policies as needed.
Deploying MCAS enables detection of insider threats, prevents data exfiltration, and strengthens security and compliance across cloud applications.
Question 172 :
Your organization wants to enforce adaptive authentication and multi-factor authentication (MFA) based on sign-in risk levels to prevent unauthorized access. Which solution should be implemented?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates user accounts and sign-ins for risk using machine learning, behavior analytics, and Microsoft threat intelligence. Unauthorized access due to compromised credentials is a major threat, and adaptive authentication policies ensure that high-risk scenarios are mitigated automatically. Identity Protection assigns risk scores to sign-ins and users, enforcing MFA or blocking access based on the severity of the detected risk.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint protects devices but does not analyze sign-in risks or enforce adaptive authentication policies.
Option B – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection detects anomalies, impossible travel events, and credential leaks. Conditional Access policies allow automatic enforcement of MFA for medium-risk users and blocking of high-risk accounts. Dashboards provide actionable insights, enabling security teams to investigate and remediate incidents quickly. Automation reduces response times, mitigates identity-related threats, and supports compliance requirements. Identity Protection also provides reporting capabilities for auditing and regulatory purposes, ensuring that the organization maintains visibility over account security and risk mitigation.
Option C – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not enforce adaptive authentication policies based on sign-in risk.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel provides centralized monitoring and orchestration but relies on Identity Protection to enforce risk-based authentication and MFA.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for user accounts and sign-ins.
Configure Conditional Access policies to enforce MFA or block access based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards for high-risk activities and investigate suspicious sign-ins.
Remediate compromised accounts promptly.
Refine risk policies periodically to adapt to evolving threat scenarios.
Deploying Azure AD Identity Protection ensures proactive mitigation of identity risks and strengthens security by enforcing adaptive authentication based on risk levels.
Question 173 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from malware, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats, while enabling automated investigation and remediation. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provides enterprise-grade endpoint protection with proactive defenses, automated investigation, and remediation capabilities. Endpoints are a primary vector for malware, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats (APTs), making real-time monitoring and automated response essential. MDE uses telemetry to detect malicious behavior, isolate compromised devices, and restore system integrity.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications but does not provide endpoint malware protection or automated remediation.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel provides centralized monitoring, threat detection, and orchestration, but does not secure endpoints independently.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects endpoint telemetry, monitors processes, registry changes, network activity, and file behavior. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine investigates alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, and restores configurations. Advanced hunting capabilities enable proactive detection of hidden threats. Integration with Sentinel allows centralized monitoring and orchestration. Automation reduces operational burden, ensuring timely mitigation of malware, ransomware, and APTs.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection mitigates identity-related risks but does not protect endpoints from malware or ransomware.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Enable Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) for alerts.
Conduct advanced hunting to detect hidden threats.
Integrate with Sentinel for centralized monitoring and orchestration.
Continuously review endpoint security policies and adapt as threats evolve.
Deploying MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated threat mitigation, and reduced risk from malware, ransomware, and APTs.
Question 174 :
Your organization wants to centralize security monitoring, threat detection, threat hunting, and automated incident response across endpoints, cloud applications, and identities. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) and SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) solution that centralizes security operations across endpoints, cloud applications, and identity systems. Organizations face increasingly complex threats, requiring a unified platform for detection, investigation, and automated response. Sentinel enhances security operations by providing real-time visibility, automated playbooks, and analytics-driven threat detection.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications and enforces policies but does not offer enterprise-wide SIEM, threat hunting, or automated orchestration.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates telemetry from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources. Analytics rules correlate events and detect anomalies. Threat hunting with Kusto Query Language (KQL) enables proactive detection of advanced threats. Automated playbooks orchestrate responses such as isolating compromised devices, disabling accounts, and notifying security teams. Dashboards provide operational visibility, compliance reporting, and incident management. Sentinel improves threat detection, investigation efficiency, and operational resilience, enabling organizations to respond quickly to multi-domain attacks.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates risky sign-ins but does not provide SIEM, centralized monitoring, or orchestration across multiple domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE protects endpoints but cannot independently provide enterprise-wide SIEM, threat hunting, or automated response.
Implementation steps:
Connect telemetry from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules for anomaly detection and event correlation.
Develop dashboards for monitoring, reporting, and compliance.
Create automated playbooks for incident response orchestration.
Conduct proactive threat hunting to refine detection rules and policies.
Deploying Sentinel ensures centralized security operations, proactive threat detection, and automated incident response across organizational security domains.
Question 175 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by controlling the execution of high-risk macros, scripts, and untrusted executables. Which solution and feature should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provide proactive, behavior-based protection against ransomware and malware. Many ransomware infections start with macros, scripts, or untrusted executables. ASR rules prevent these risky actions, reducing the attack surface on endpoints and mitigating ransomware risk.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is signature-based and reactive, providing limited protection against zero-day and behavior-based attacks.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules restrict execution of high-risk scripts, macros, and untrusted executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. Phased deployment reduces false positives, while continuous monitoring ensures optimal protection. ASR rules prevent malware execution, limit ransomware propagation, and enhance overall endpoint security. They also support reporting, auditing, and compliance requirements.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection mitigates authentication risks but does not control malware execution on endpoints.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS secures cloud applications but cannot enforce execution restrictions on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize operational impact.
Deploy ASR rules gradually across all endpoints.
Configure automated remediation for detected violations.
Monitor alerts and refine ASR rules as needed.
Educate users on safe computing practices to complement technical protections.
Deploying MDE with ASR rules ensures proactive protection against ransomware and malware, reducing endpoint risk while maintaining operational efficiency.
Question 176 :
Your organization wants to detect and prevent unauthorized access by identifying compromised user accounts and risky sign-ins, and enforce automated responses such as blocking or MFA. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Azure AD Identity Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Azure AD Identity Protection
Explanation:
Azure AD Identity Protection is a specialized solution for identity security that focuses on detecting risky sign-ins, compromised accounts, and unusual authentication behavior. Identity-related attacks are among the most common causes of data breaches, including credential theft, account compromise, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems. Identity Protection evaluates risks using behavioral analytics, machine learning, and Microsoft threat intelligence to provide an automated and proactive defense mechanism.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: While Defender for Endpoint provides robust endpoint protection against malware and ransomware, it does not monitor user sign-in risks or enforce adaptive authentication measures.
Option B – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection continuously monitors sign-ins and evaluates risk events such as impossible travel, unfamiliar sign-in properties, and credentials found in leaks. Based on the calculated risk level, the solution can automatically enforce Conditional Access policies, requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA) or blocking access for high-risk users. Dashboards provide detailed visibility into detected risks, allowing administrators to investigate incidents and remediate compromised accounts. Automation significantly reduces the response time to identity threats, mitigates potential breaches, and ensures regulatory compliance by logging all actions. This proactive approach improves overall organizational security posture while minimizing the operational burden on IT teams.
Option C – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS focuses on monitoring cloud applications for anomalous behavior and potential data exfiltration, but does not enforce risk-based authentication on user accounts.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel provides centralized monitoring, correlation, and orchestration but requires integration with Identity Protection to enforce risk-based access policies.
Implementation steps:
Enable risk detection for all user accounts and sign-ins.
Configure Conditional Access policies to enforce MFA or block access based on risk levels.
Monitor dashboards to identify high-risk users and sign-ins.
Investigate and remediate compromised accounts promptly.
Continuously refine risk policies to address new threat vectors and improve detection accuracy.
Deploying Azure AD Identity Protection ensures the organization can proactively prevent unauthorized access, strengthen identity security, and maintain compliance with regulatory standards.
Question 177 :
Your organization wants to monitor cloud applications for insider threats, risky behavior, and accidental data leaks. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Sentinel
Answer: B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Explanation:
Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) is designed to provide visibility, monitoring, and control over cloud applications to mitigate insider threats, accidental data leaks, and unauthorized access. Cloud-based collaboration and storage platforms can introduce security risks if user activity is not monitored effectively, including bulk downloads, unusual sharing patterns, or access from suspicious locations.
Option A – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Defender for Endpoint provides endpoint malware protection but does not provide cloud application monitoring or data loss prevention capabilities.
Option B – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS discovers all cloud applications in use, evaluates their risk, and continuously monitors user activity. Behavioral analytics detect anomalies in user actions, identifying potential insider threats or compromised accounts. Administrators can enforce policies that restrict risky behavior, require re-authentication, or block data exfiltration attempts. Integration with Microsoft Information Protection enables automated labeling and protection of sensitive data, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of accidental exposure. Alerts provide actionable insights for rapid incident response, and dashboards allow comprehensive visibility across cloud applications. Continuous monitoring and adaptive policy enforcement make MCAS a robust solution for mitigating insider threats and accidental leaks.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection focuses on evaluating sign-in risk and compromised credentials, but does not provide comprehensive monitoring of cloud application activity.
Option D – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel aggregates security data and orchestrates responses but relies on MCAS for cloud-specific monitoring and threat detection.
Implementation steps:
Discover and classify all cloud applications used within the organization.
Implement monitoring policies to detect anomalous activity.
Apply automated controls to prevent risky behavior or data exfiltration.
Integrate with Microsoft Information Protection for sensitive data labeling and protection.
Continuously monitor alerts and refine policies to maintain adaptive protection.
Deploying MCAS ensures proactive monitoring, detection of insider threats, and prevention of data exfiltration while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Question 178 :
Your organization wants to protect endpoints from malware, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats, while enabling automated investigation and remediation. Which solution should be implemented?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
D) Azure AD Identity Protection
Answer: C) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Explanation:
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) is an enterprise-grade solution that provides proactive endpoint protection, automated investigation, and remediation to defend against malware, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). Endpoints are a primary attack vector, and timely detection and mitigation of threats are critical for organizational security.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS focuses on cloud application monitoring and policy enforcement but does not provide comprehensive endpoint threat detection or remediation capabilities.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel provides centralized monitoring and orchestration, but does not independently secure endpoints.
Option C – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE collects telemetry from endpoints, including process execution, network connections, file activity, and registry changes. Its Automated Investigation and Remediation (AIR) engine investigates alerts, isolates compromised devices, terminates malicious processes, and restores system integrity. Advanced hunting capabilities enable proactive detection of hidden threats, and integration with Sentinel allows centralized monitoring, correlation, and orchestration. Automated remediation reduces response time, minimizes operational burden, and ensures effective mitigation of threats. Organizations can continuously refine detection rules, policies, and security baselines to improve endpoint security posture.
Option D – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection mitigates identity-related risks but does not protect endpoints from malware or ransomware.
Implementation steps:
Onboard all endpoints to MDE for continuous monitoring.
Enable automated investigation and remediation for alerts.
Conduct advanced hunting to detect potential hidden threats.
Integrate with Sentinel for centralized monitoring and orchestration.
Regularly review and refine endpoint security policies and detection rules.
Deploying MDE ensures proactive endpoint protection, automated threat mitigation, and reduced risk from malware, ransomware, and APTs.
Question 179 :
Your organization wants to centralize monitoring, threat detection, threat hunting, and automated incident response across endpoints, cloud applications, and identities. Which solution should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Microsoft Sentinel
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Answer: B) Microsoft Sentinel
Explanation:
Microsoft Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR solution that centralizes security operations across all domains, including endpoints, cloud applications, and identity systems. Modern security threats are sophisticated and multi-domain, requiring a unified platform capable of detecting, investigating, and responding to incidents in real time. Sentinel enhances security operations by providing analytics-driven threat detection, proactive threat hunting, automated response playbooks, and comprehensive dashboards.
Option A – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS monitors cloud applications but does not provide enterprise-wide SIEM, threat hunting, or automated incident response across multiple domains.
Option B – Microsoft Sentinel: Sentinel ingests telemetry from endpoints, cloud apps, and identity sources. Analytics rules correlate events and detect anomalies, providing actionable alerts. Threat hunting with Kusto Query Language (KQL) allows proactive detection of advanced threats. Automated playbooks orchestrate incident response, including isolating compromised devices, disabling accounts, and notifying relevant teams. Dashboards provide visibility, reporting, and compliance monitoring. By centralizing operations, Sentinel improves operational efficiency, reduces response times, and strengthens the organization’s security posture.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection evaluates risky sign-ins but does not provide SIEM capabilities or orchestrate responses across multiple domains.
Option D – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: MDE secures endpoints but cannot independently provide enterprise-wide monitoring, threat hunting, or incident response.
Implementation steps:
Connect telemetry from endpoints, cloud applications, and identity sources to Sentinel.
Configure analytics rules to detect anomalies and correlate events.
Build dashboards for operational monitoring and compliance reporting.
Create automated playbooks to respond to incidents efficiently.
Conduct threat hunting and continuously refine detection rules and policies.
Deploying Sentinel centralizes security operations, improves threat detection, and automates incident response across organizational security domains.
Question 180 :
Your organization wants to prevent ransomware and malware on endpoints by controlling the execution of high-risk macros, scripts, and untrusted applications. Which solution and feature should be deployed?
A) Microsoft Defender Antivirus
B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
C) Azure AD Identity Protection
D) Microsoft Cloud App Security
Answer: B) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules
Explanation:
Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) provide proactive, behavior-based protection against ransomware and malware. Ransomware infections often begin with macros, scripts, or untrusted executables, and ASR rules prevent execution of these high-risk actions. By controlling execution paths, organizations can significantly reduce the attack surface on endpoints and prevent the propagation of malware.
Option A – Microsoft Defender Antivirus: Traditional antivirus is signature-based and reactive, providing limited protection against zero-day threats or behavior-based attacks.
Option B – Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with ASR rules: ASR rules prevent risky actions on endpoints, including execution of untrusted scripts, macros, and executables. Integration with MDE provides telemetry, alerting, and automated remediation. Phased deployment minimizes false positives, and continuous monitoring ensures optimal protection. ASR rules prevent malware execution, limit ransomware propagation, and improve overall endpoint security posture. They also provide reporting, auditing, and compliance support.
Option C – Azure AD Identity Protection: Identity Protection addresses authentication risks but does not control execution of malware or scripts on endpoints.
Option D – Microsoft Cloud App Security: MCAS secures cloud applications but cannot enforce execution restrictions on endpoints.
Implementation steps:
Test ASR rules in a controlled environment to minimize operational disruption.
Deploy ASR rules gradually across endpoints.
Configure automated remediation for detected violations.
Monitor alerts and refine ASR rules as necessary.
Educate users on safe computing practices to complement technical protections.
Deploying MDE with ASR rules ensures proactive endpoint protection against ransomware and malware, reducing organizational risk while maintaining operational efficiency.