Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q121-135

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121:

You need to provide secure, private, and high-performance connectivity between VNets across different regions without exposing traffic to the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables VNets in different Azure regions to communicate privately using private IP addresses over Microsoft’s backbone network. This ensures that traffic does not traverse the public internet, offering low latency, high throughput, and secure communication. Global VNet Peering is ideal for multi-tier applications and workloads requiring reliable inter-VNet connectivity across regions. Its configuration is simpler than alternatives such as VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute, avoiding the complexity of tunnel setup, BGP configuration, or additional routing appliances.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connections over the internet. Although secure, VPN connections experience latency variability, bandwidth limitations, and depend on internet stability. Configuring VPN Gateway for multi-VNet connectivity across regions adds complexity due to tunnel management, BGP, and route configurations.

Option C, ExpressRoute, delivers private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. Using it solely for inter-VNet communication is cost-prohibitive and operationally unnecessary. ExpressRoute is optimized for hybrid cloud scenarios rather than intra-cloud VNet connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. NSGs provide access control but do not create connectivity. They complement peering by enforcing security over the established connection, but cannot replace it.

Deploying Global VNet Peering allows enterprises to maintain private, high-speed communication between regions. It supports distributed applications, multi-region deployments, and centralized management. The Microsoft backbone ensures predictable performance and low latency. Integration with NSGs provides layered security, combining connectivity with granular traffic control. Global VNet Peering aligns with enterprise best practices for scalability, security, and operational efficiency. It reduces administrative overhead, ensures reliable performance, and supports mission-critical applications requiring secure and efficient cross-region connectivity. Global VNet Peering is a fundamental solution in Azure for enabling private, seamless connectivity between virtual networks (VNets) across different regions. Unlike VPN Gateway, which relies on encrypted tunnels over the public internet, Global VNet Peering leverages Microsoft’s highly reliable backbone network to transfer data between VNets. This means traffic never leaves the Azure infrastructure, resulting in lower latency, higher throughput, and more consistent performance. For organizations deploying multi-region applications, such as globally distributed web services, enterprise resource planning systems, or data analytics platforms, the predictable network behavior of Global VNet Peering is essential. It ensures that applications can communicate with each other as if they were within the same local network, removing the need to design around public internet variability.

From an operational standpoint, Global VNet Peering simplifies network management significantly. Traditional VPN-based approaches often require configuring multiple tunnels, managing IPsec encryption, monitoring connection health, and implementing Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing to achieve inter-VNet connectivity. Each additional VNet increases the complexity exponentially, especially when deployed across regions. Global VNet Peering eliminates much of this overhead, allowing administrators to connect VNets with a few clicks or automated scripts. The simplicity in configuration reduces the likelihood of misconfigurations, which are common causes of connectivity issues in large-scale cloud networks.

In addition to performance and simplicity, Global VNet Peering also supports robust security practices. All traffic remains on Microsoft’s private backbone, reducing exposure to external threats. While Network Security Groups (NSGs) can enforce granular access control at the subnet or network interface level, peering ensures that the traffic itself does not traverse insecure paths. This combination of private connectivity and traffic governance aligns with enterprise security frameworks and compliance requirements, such as ISO, SOC, or GDPR, where the protection of inter-region traffic is critical.

Cost-efficiency is another significant advantage. Unlike ExpressRoute, which provides private connections between on-premises networks and Azure and is optimized for hybrid scenarios, Global VNet Peering focuses on intra-cloud connectivity. Using ExpressRoute purely to connect VNets across regions would incur unnecessary charges and operational complexity without adding substantial benefits. Similarly, while VPN Gateway can achieve cross-region connectivity, its reliance on the public internet, limited bandwidth, and maintenance requirements make it less desirable for high-performance, mission-critical applications.

Global VNet Peering also supports advanced architectures, such as hub-and-spoke or multi-tier designs. VNets can be peered in a mesh or hierarchical pattern, enabling centralized services in a hub VNet to be accessed securely from multiple regional VNets. This allows enterprises to maintain centralized control over network policies while still providing high-speed access to distributed applications. Additionally, the peering setup supports both IPv4 and IPv6, future-proofing the network design for evolving global applications and Internet of Things (IoT) workloads.

In practical terms, organizations benefit from faster deployment cycles and reduced operational overhead. Developers can assume reliable connectivity between application components, enabling agile development and rapid scaling. Operations teams spend less time troubleshooting connectivity problems or maintaining tunnels and routing configurations. The overall architecture becomes more resilient, with fewer single points of failure and predictable behavior across multiple regions.

In conclusion, Global VNet Peering provides a secure, high-performance, cost-effective, and operationally efficient solution for inter-region VNet connectivity. It supports enterprise-scale applications, simplifies network management, enhances security, and ensures predictable performance. By integrating peering with NSGs and other Azure network services, organizations can achieve a balanced architecture that combines speed, security, and scalability, making it the preferred choice for cross-region cloud networking.

Question 122:

You need to enforce outbound security policies and provide centralized traffic inspection for multiple VNets while ensuring high availability and automatic scaling. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall that provides centralized enforcement of outbound traffic policies across multiple VNets. Administrators can define network and application-level rules, integrate threat intelligence for proactive detection of malicious activity, and log all traffic for auditing and monitoring. Azure Firewall automatically scales with traffic demand and offers built-in high availability, ensuring uninterrupted enforcement during traffic spikes or regional failures. Centralized deployment reduces operational complexity compared to managing multiple NSGs individually.

Option B, NSGs, provide granular access control at the subnet or NIC level but lack centralized enforcement, automatic scaling, and threat intelligence capabilities. While essential for segmentation, NSGs alone cannot provide enterprise-scale outbound traffic inspection.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 to enhance availability but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. Its function is high availability, not security enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities. It is limited to HTTP/HTTPS traffic and cannot inspect all outbound traffic across multiple VNets or enforce centralized policies.

Deploying Azure Firewall ensures consistent, centralized enforcement of outbound traffic policies, reducing administrative overhead and increasing security reliability. Threat intelligence integration allows proactive blocking of malicious traffic, and logging enables auditing and compliance monitoring. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, providing centralized inspection without deploying multiple appliances. Automatic scaling guarantees that traffic enforcement continues uninterrupted during peak loads. Centralized management ensures a consistent security posture across the enterprise, minimizing configuration errors and improving operational efficiency. Azure Firewall aligns with enterprise best practices by providing scalable, reliable, and robust cloud network security while integrating with Azure monitoring and compliance tools. Azure Firewall is a cornerstone of enterprise-grade network security in Azure, offering organizations a highly reliable, fully managed solution for controlling and monitoring network traffic across their cloud infrastructure. Unlike traditional network security approaches, which may rely on multiple firewalls deployed in different VNets or rely solely on Network Security Groups (NSGs), Azure Firewall centralizes policy enforcement. This centralization ensures that security rules are consistent, auditable, and easier to manage across complex network architectures. For enterprises with multiple VNets, hub-and-spoke topologies, or multi-region deployments, this capability is critical to maintaining a unified security posture without introducing operational complexity.

One of the key strengths of Azure Firewall is its stateful nature. Being stateful means it tracks the state of network connections, allowing it to make intelligent decisions about allowing or blocking traffic based on the context of the connection rather than only on static rules. This capability reduces the likelihood of misconfigurations and improves the accuracy of threat detection. Furthermore, Azure Firewall can inspect both inbound and outbound traffic, offering comprehensive visibility into network activity. Organizations gain the ability to monitor not only what traffic enters their network but also what leaves, which is essential for detecting exfiltration attempts, unauthorized communications, or connections to known malicious endpoints.

Another notable advantage is the integration of threat intelligence. Azure Firewall leverages Microsoft’s continuously updated threat intelligence database to identify and block traffic associated with malicious domains and IP addresses. This proactive approach allows enterprises to stay ahead of emerging threats without having to manually update rulesets or maintain separate threat feeds. The firewall can also be configured to alert administrators about suspicious activity, enabling faster response times and more effective incident management. This capability is particularly valuable for organizations with stringent compliance requirements, as it helps demonstrate ongoing monitoring and proactive risk mitigation.

Scalability and high availability are additional differentiators. Azure Firewall automatically scales to accommodate varying traffic loads, ensuring that policy enforcement does not become a bottleneck even during peak usage periods. This elasticity is critical for dynamic cloud environments where application traffic can spike unpredictably. High availability is built into the service, reducing downtime risks and ensuring uninterrupted security coverage. Organizations do not need to deploy multiple firewall appliances manually or manage complex load-balancing configurations, which reduces both operational overhead and the potential for human error.

Azure Firewall also provides rich logging and analytics capabilities. Logs can be sent to Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, or third-party SIEM solutions for detailed auditing, traffic analysis, and compliance reporting. This not only supports regulatory requirements but also empowers security teams to perform historical traffic analysis, identify patterns, and improve security policies over time. The centralized management of Azure Firewall allows for consistent updates and policy enforcement across all VNets, eliminating discrepancies that may occur when individual NSGs or appliances are configured independently.

Additionally, Azure Firewall supports modern enterprise architectures, including hybrid cloud scenarios. It can interact seamlessly with on-premises networks connected via VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute, enforcing consistent security policies across both cloud and on-premises environments. This integration simplifies governance, ensuring that enterprise-wide security standards are maintained regardless of traffic origin or destination.

Azure Firewall provides a robust, scalable, and intelligent solution for centralized network security in Azure. By combining stateful traffic inspection, threat intelligence integration, high availability, automatic scaling, centralized management, and comprehensive logging, it offers enterprises the ability to maintain a secure and resilient cloud infrastructure. This approach reduces operational complexity, mitigates risks, supports compliance, and aligns with best practices for modern cloud network security, making it an essential component of enterprise network architecture.

Question 123:

You need to dynamically propagate routes between multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances for centralized inspection, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation across VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual route management, reduces configuration errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex network architectures. Integration with NVAs enables centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security compliance across multiple VNets. Route Server is particularly valuable for large-scale enterprise networks, where manual routing would be time-consuming and error-prone.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP for dynamic routing but does not integrate with NVAs for centralized inspection across VNets. VPN Gateway requires manual route configuration in multi-VNet deployments, increasing operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure but does not automatically propagate routes between VNets or integrate with NVAs for centralized inspection. Manual configuration is required, making it less suitable for enterprise-scale deployments.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot handle dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server by securing traffic, but cannot replace routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures reliable, automated route propagation while integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection. This improves operational efficiency, reduces human error, and maintains high availability. Enterprises gain visibility into route propagation, can detect anomalies, and maintain compliance efficiently. Route Server supports hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, ensuring consistent and secure routing across distributed networks. By combining dynamic routing with centralized inspection, organizations achieve operational simplicity, security consistency, and reliable communication. Route Server aligns with best practices for scalable, secure, and enterprise-grade network management. Azure Route Server is a transformative solution for managing routing in complex Azure network environments. Automating route propagation eliminates the need for extensive manual configuration that is traditionally required when connecting multiple VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers. This automation is particularly important for large-scale enterprise networks, where even a small misconfiguration can cause significant disruptions to application connectivity or security compliance. With Route Server, administrators can focus on strategic network design and policy enforcement rather than spending time manually updating routes whenever network topology changes occur.

The integration of Azure Route Server with NVAs adds significant operational and security value. NVAs, which often perform functions like traffic inspection, intrusion detection, and application-level filtering, rely on accurate routing information to process traffic effectively. Route Server ensures that these appliances receive up-to-date routing information automatically, allowing for centralized inspection and enforcement of network policies. This centralization reduces the likelihood of security gaps or inconsistent policy enforcement across multiple VNets and regions. Organizations can maintain a consistent security posture, which is critical for meeting regulatory requirements and enterprise compliance standards.

Azure Route Server also supports dynamic routing using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is the industry standard for scalable, resilient routing. BGP allows networks to adapt automatically to changes in topology, such as the addition of new VNets, changes in peering configurations, or failover scenarios. Without a Route Server, administrators would need to manually update routing tables across multiple VNets and appliances, a process that is both time-consuming and prone to human error. The dynamic nature of the Route Server ensures that traffic takes the optimal path at all times, improving performance and reliability. This is especially beneficial for hybrid cloud deployments, where consistent routing between on-premises and cloud networks is critical.

Another important advantage of Azure Route Server is its support for hub-and-spoke architectures. In these designs, a central hub VNet manages traffic and connectivity to multiple spoke VNets. Route Server simplifies the propagation of routes from the hub to spokes and vice versa, enabling scalable designs without the administrative burden of manual route configuration. Additionally, Route Server facilitates multi-region architectures by ensuring that VNets across different regions have consistent and reliable route information. This capability is essential for global enterprises running distributed applications that require low latency and predictable connectivity.

Azure Route Server also enhances operational visibility and monitoring. Administrators gain insight into route propagation across the network, making it easier to detect anomalies, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and verify that traffic flows as expected. This visibility supports proactive management, reducing downtime and minimizing the risk of misrouted traffic or application disruptions. Combined with high availability features, the Route Server ensures that network connectivity remains stable even during failures or maintenance activities.

From a strategic perspective, Azure Route Server aligns with enterprise goals of simplifying network management, reducing operational complexity, and enhancing security. By combining automated route propagation, BGP-based dynamic routing, and centralized inspection through NVAs, organizations can deploy scalable and secure network architectures that are resilient to change. This approach improves efficiency, reduces human error, ensures compliance, and enables enterprises to respond rapidly to evolving business and technical requirements. Azure Route Server thus serves as a foundational component for modern, enterprise-grade Azure networks, providing the reliability, visibility, and security necessary for mission-critical workloads.

Question 124:

You need high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and multiple Azure VNets, with predictable performance and enterprise-grade reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, making it suitable for enterprise workloads requiring reliable network performance. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, facilitating hybrid cloud deployments and mission-critical applications such as financial systems, analytics platforms, and large-scale data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, uses the public internet for encrypted connectivity. VPN connections are subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and internet reliability, making them unsuitable for enterprise workloads demanding high performance and predictable behavior.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without public IPs but does not support high-throughput, low-latency connectivity for hybrid workloads. Bastion is focused on management access rather than enterprise networking.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity, throughput guarantees, or predictable latency. They complement connectivity solutions but cannot serve as a transport mechanism.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, high-performance connectivity, supporting hybrid and multi-region architectures. Integration with monitoring tools allows proactive performance tracking and capacity planning. By bypassing the public internet, ExpressRoute enhances security and reliability, supporting disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade workloads. It aligns with best practices for hybrid cloud networking, delivering operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations benefit from predictable performance, enhanced security, and reduced administrative complexity, ensuring business-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.

Question 125:

You need to route global users to the nearest available application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and support disaster recovery. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic in case of failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery support. This is crucial for globally distributed applications that require minimal latency and consistent service availability.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 regional load balancing with WAF capabilities, but cannot perform global DNS-based routing, health-based failover, or latency-based routing across multiple regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot provide global endpoint routing, health-based failover, or latency-based optimization, limiting its applicability for globally distributed applications.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery support. Its primary function is security enforcement rather than performance optimization or high availability.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the closest healthy endpoint, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global application availability and supports disaster recovery by automatically rerouting traffic during regional failures. Integration with monitoring provides visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint health, and user experience, enabling proactive management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for global applications, ensuring operational continuity, high performance, and disaster recovery readiness. It provides intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover, making it essential for resilient, scalable, and globally distributed applications.

Question 126:

You need to provide private, secure, and high-performance connectivity between VNets in different regions for a multi-tier application without using the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows VNets in different regions to communicate privately using private IP addresses over the Microsoft backbone. It ensures that traffic does not traverse the public internet, providing low latency, high throughput, and secure communication, which is essential for multi-tier applications where application, database, and web layers may reside in different VNets or regions. Its configuration is simpler than alternatives like VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute, which require complex tunnel setups, BGP configurations, or additional infrastructure.

Option B, VPN Gateway, establishes encrypted connections over the internet. While secure, VPN connections are subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and dependency on public internet reliability. For multi-tier applications with interdependent workloads, these limitations can cause performance issues and operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Using ExpressRoute solely for inter-VNet communication is cost-inefficient and operationally unnecessary, as it is optimized for hybrid cloud scenarios rather than intra-cloud VNet communication.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. NSGs provide access control but do not create connectivity. They are complementary to Global VNet Peering by securing traffic, but cannot replace connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering provides predictable, low-latency connectivity across regions, enabling seamless communication for distributed applications. Enterprises benefit from reliable network performance, simplified management, and secure communication. Integration with NSGs adds granular traffic control, reinforcing security while ensuring operational efficiency. Global VNet Peering supports hub-and-spoke architectures, disaster recovery, and multi-region deployments, aligning with enterprise networking best practices for scalability, security, and operational efficiency. It provides a foundation for mission-critical applications requiring secure and efficient cross-region connectivity.

Question 127:

You need to enforce centralized outbound traffic policies and inspection for multiple VNets while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall that provides centralized inspection and policy enforcement for outbound traffic across multiple VNets. It enables administrators to define network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence to block malicious activity, and log all traffic for monitoring and auditing. Azure Firewall scales automatically based on traffic demands and ensures high availability, allowing continuous enforcement even during peak traffic or regional failures. Centralized deployment reduces complexity and avoids configuration errors associated with managing multiple NSGs individually.

Option B, NSGs, control traffic at the subnet or NIC level. While essential for segmentation, NSGs lack centralized enforcement, automatic scaling, or application-level inspection. They are insufficient for enterprise-wide outbound traffic inspection in complex multi-VNet architectures.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. Its primary function is high availability, not security enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities. It is limited to HTTP/HTTPS traffic and cannot inspect all outbound traffic across multiple VNets or enforce centralized policies.

Deploying Azure Firewall ensures centralized and consistent enforcement of outbound policies, reducing operational overhead and increasing security reliability. Threat intelligence allows proactive defense against known threats, and logging provides visibility for auditing and compliance. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling centralized inspection without deploying multiple appliances. Automatic scaling ensures uninterrupted enforcement during peak periods. Centralized management guarantees a consistent security posture across the enterprise, reducing misconfiguration risks and improving operational efficiency. Azure Firewall aligns with enterprise best practices by providing scalable, reliable, and robust cloud network security while integrating with Azure monitoring, alerting, and compliance tools.

Question 128:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances to enable centralized inspection, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual configuration, prevents misrouting errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex network topologies. Integration with NVAs allows centralized inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across multiple VNets. Route Server is particularly beneficial for enterprise-scale networks where manual routing would be operationally intensive and error-prone.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet dynamic routing via VPN Gateway still requires manual route configuration, increasing administrative overhead and risk of misconfiguration.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but does not automatically propagate routes between VNets or integrate with NVAs for centralized inspection. Manual configuration is required, reducing efficiency for large-scale networks.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot manage dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but cannot replace routing capabilities.

Question 129:

You need private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and multiple Azure VNets, ensuring predictable performance and enterprise-grade reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures low latency, high throughput, and predictable performance, making it suitable for enterprise workloads requiring reliable network performance. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, facilitating hybrid cloud deployments and mission-critical applications such as real-time analytics, financial systems, and large-scale data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, establishes encrypted connectivity over the internet. While secure, VPN connections are subject to latency fluctuations, bandwidth constraints, and reliance on internet performance, making them unsuitable for enterprise workloads that require predictable performance.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without public IPs. Bastion focuses on management access and does not support high-throughput, low-latency connectivity for hybrid workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or guarantees of throughput or latency. NSGs complement connectivity solutions but cannot replace transport mechanisms.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. It integrates with monitoring tools for performance tracking and capacity planning. By bypassing the public internet, ExpressRoute enhances security, reliability, and consistency. It supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade workloads. ExpressRoute aligns with hybrid cloud networking best practices, providing operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations benefit from predictable performance, operational efficiency, and enhanced security, ensuring business-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.

Question 130:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic in case of failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery support. This is critical for globally distributed applications that require minimal latency and reliable service.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 regional load balancing with WAF capabilities, but cannot perform global DNS-based routing, latency optimization, or health-based failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot provide global endpoint routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization, making it unsuitable for globally distributed applications.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery support. Its primary function is security enforcement rather than high availability or routing intelligence.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are directed to the closest healthy endpoint, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global application availability and supports disaster recovery by rerouting traffic automatically during regional failures. Monitoring provides visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint health, and user experience, enabling proactive management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for global applications, ensuring operational continuity, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. It provides intelligent routing, health monitoring, and failover capabilities critical for resilient, scalable, and globally distributed enterprise applications.

Question 131:

You need to enable secure, private communication between multiple VNets across Azure regions without using the public internet, while ensuring low latency and high throughput. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering provides private, high-speed communication between VNets in different regions over Microsoft’s backbone network. Using private IP addresses ensures that traffic does not traverse the public internet, maintaining both security and predictable performance. Global VNet Peering is particularly suitable for multi-tier applications where different layers (web, application, database) reside in separate VNets across regions. It simplifies network topology by eliminating the need for complex VPN tunnels, BGP configurations, or additional routing infrastructure. The solution reduces administrative complexity while enabling scalable and reliable network connectivity.

Option B, VPN Gateway, secures connections over the public internet using IPsec tunnels. VPN Gateway is subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and dependency on internet reliability. Multi-VNet inter-region setups require additional tunnels, routing configuration, and monitoring, increasing complexity and operational risk.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed to provide private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. While it offers high performance and reliability, using it solely for inter-VNet communication is cost-prohibitive and operationally unnecessary. ExpressRoute is better suited for hybrid cloud deployments rather than intra-cloud VNet connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but do not provide connectivity. NSGs complement VNet Peering by securing traffic, but cannot replace connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering provides predictable, low-latency, and high-throughput connectivity between VNets across regions. It enables distributed applications to communicate securely, supports hub-and-spoke architectures, and simplifies operational management. Integration with NSGs allows layered security, providing granular control over traffic while ensuring reliable inter-VNet communication. Global VNet Peering aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and operationally efficient network architecture. It ensures mission-critical applications can function optimally with secure, private, and high-performance connectivity.

Question 132:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and security policy enforcement across multiple VNets, while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service that enables centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets. Administrators can define both network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence to block malicious traffic, and monitor all traffic with logging and analytics for compliance and operational insights. Azure Firewall automatically scales to meet demand and ensures high availability, allowing enterprises to maintain continuous security enforcement even during traffic spikes or regional failures.

Option B, NSGs, control traffic at the subnet or NIC level and provide granular access control, but lack centralized policy enforcement, automatic scaling, and threat intelligence. While NSGs are critical for segmentation, they do not provide enterprise-scale outbound inspection or centralized management.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic to enhance availability but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. Its primary role is high availability at layer 4 and cannot replace a firewall.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities but only inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot handle all outbound traffic across multiple VNets or provide centralized enforcement at the network level.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows enterprises to enforce consistent security policies, improve threat detection, and ensure regulatory compliance. Its centralized architecture reduces operational complexity, avoids configuration errors, and provides scalable protection across VNets. Threat intelligence allows proactive blocking of known malicious IPs and domains, while logging enables audit readiness and operational visibility. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling centralized inspection without deploying multiple appliances. High availability and automatic scaling ensure uninterrupted traffic enforcement, aligning with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable, and operationally efficient network architecture. Azure Firewall provides enterprises with robust security controls, operational simplicity, and enhanced compliance capabilities.

Question 133:

You need to dynamically propagate routes between VNets and integrate network virtual appliances for centralized inspection, minimizing manual configuration and operational overhead. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server provides automated route propagation across VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates the need for manual route management, prevents misrouting errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex network topologies. Integration with NVAs allows centralized traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and enhanced security compliance across VNets. Route Server is particularly valuable for enterprises with large-scale networks, where manual routing would be operationally intensive and error-prone.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP-based dynamic routing but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet dynamic routing via VPN Gateway still requires manual route configuration and additional monitoring, increasing administrative complexity and operational risk.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot handle dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but do not replace its routing capabilities.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable route propagation while integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises benefit from reduced configuration errors, operational efficiency, and high availability. Route Server provides visibility into route propagation, anomaly detection, and ensures compliance across distributed networks. Supporting hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, Route Server delivers consistent, secure, and scalable routing. Combining dynamic routing with centralized inspection aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and efficient network management, enabling operational simplicity, enhanced security, and reliable communication across complex network topologies.

Question 134:

You need to provide private, low-latency, high-throughput connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, ensuring predictable performance and enterprise-grade reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is essential for enterprise workloads requiring reliable and consistent network connectivity. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, enabling hybrid deployments and supporting mission-critical applications such as large-scale analytics, financial applications, and real-time data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the internet but is subject to variable latency, bandwidth constraints, and internet reliability. VPN Gateway is less suitable for workloads that demand predictable performance and enterprise-grade reliability.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure remote access to VMs without public IPs. It does not provide high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and VNets, as its focus is on administrative access rather than transport.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity, throughput guarantees, or predictable latency. NSGs are a complementary security measure, not a connectivity solution.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures reliable, high-performance, and predictable connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Integration with monitoring tools supports performance tracking, capacity planning, and proactive management. By bypassing the public internet, ExpressRoute enhances both security and reliability, enabling disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade application performance. This approach aligns with hybrid cloud networking best practices, delivering operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations achieve predictable performance, enhanced security, and reduced operational complexity, ensuring mission-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.

Question 135:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and ensure disaster recovery support. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based traffic routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports routing methods including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic during failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery readiness. This is critical for globally distributed applications where latency reduction and uptime are essential.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot route traffic globally, provide health-based failover, or optimize latency for global applications.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security but does not provide global routing or performance optimization. Its focus is security enforcement rather than high availability or disaster recovery.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures that users are routed to the closest healthy endpoint, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global application availability and supports disaster recovery by rerouting traffic automatically during regional outages. Traffic monitoring provides visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint health, and user experience, enabling proactive management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for global applications, ensuring operational continuity, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. It provides intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover, which are essential for resilient, scalable, and globally distributed enterprise applications.

Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q121-135

Related posts: