Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q31-45

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 31:

You need to implement end-to-end encryption and secure communication between multiple VNets and on-premises networks without exposing traffic to the public internet. Which solution is most appropriate?

A) VPN Gateway with site-to-site connections
B) VNet Peering
C) Azure Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

VPN Gateway with site-to-site connections provides a secure, encrypted connection between Azure VNets and on-premises networks over IPsec/IKE. This ensures that traffic traverses a secure tunnel without exposure to the public internet. Site-to-site VPN connections enable multiple on-premises sites to communicate with VNets while supporting hybrid network topologies. VPN Gateway supports BGP routing, which allows dynamic route updates and simplifies network management as routes between VNets and on-premises networks change.

Option B, VNet Peering, allows private connectivity between VNets within Azure. While it ensures low-latency traffic and no public internet exposure, it does not extend connectivity to on-premises networks. Peering also does not provide encryption; traffic remains private within the Azure backbone, but end-to-end encryption for hybrid scenarios requires VPN or ExpressRoute.

Option C, Azure Load Balancer, distributes traffic between VMs but does not provide encryption or secure connectivity for hybrid networks. It operates at layer 4 and focuses on high availability within a region rather than secure end-to-end traffic encryption.

Option D, Application Gateway, operates at layer 7 for HTTP/HTTPS traffic, providing SSL termination and application-layer routing. It does not secure network-level communication between VNets or on-premises networks.

Implementing VPN Gateway ensures that sensitive data transmitted between on-premises and Azure environments is encrypted, meeting regulatory and compliance requirements. It supports both static and dynamic routing, redundancy for high availability, and integration with monitoring tools for network diagnostics. Organizations benefit from secure hybrid network architecture, simplified route management via BGP, and the ability to scale connections as the network grows. VPN Gateway is ideal for enterprises requiring encrypted, reliable, and compliant communication channels across cloud and on-premises environments.VPN Gateway with site-to-site connections is a fundamental component in establishing a secure hybrid network architecture between Azure and on-premises environments. By leveraging IPsec/IKE protocols, it ensures that all traffic passing through the connection is encrypted, providing confidentiality and integrity for sensitive organizational data. This is particularly important for industries such as finance, healthcare, and government, where regulatory compliance mandates secure data transmission. The VPN Gateway supports both policy-based and route-based configurations, giving network administrators flexibility to design network topologies according to organizational requirements.

In addition to encryption, VPN Gateway supports BGP routing, which enables dynamic route updates between Azure VNets and on-premises networks. This capability simplifies network management by automatically propagating route changes without requiring manual intervention, reducing the risk of configuration errors. Furthermore, VPN Gateway provides built-in redundancy and high availability features, ensuring that business-critical workloads maintain connectivity even in the event of a network failure. It also allows multiple site-to-site connections, enabling enterprises with geographically distributed offices to securely connect to a central VNet.

Monitoring and diagnostics are enhanced through integration with Azure Network Watcher, allowing administrators to track performance metrics, detect anomalies, and troubleshoot connectivity issues efficiently. Additionally, VPN Gateway scales to accommodate increasing network traffic, supporting large-scale hybrid deployments. By implementing VPN Gateway, organizations achieve a secure, reliable, and compliant solution for hybrid networking, facilitating seamless communication between on-premises infrastructure and Azure resources while maintaining stringent security standards.

Question 32:

You need to implement a scalable architecture for routing traffic between VNets in multiple regions while integrating centralized inspection for security. Which solution should you deploy?

A) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub
B) Direct VNet Peering between all VNets
C) Application Gateway with WAF in each VNet
D) Standard Load Balancer across VNets

Answer:
A

Explanation:

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub is the recommended design for scalable multi-region VNet connectivity with centralized traffic inspection. In this model, spoke VNets connect to a central hub that contains Azure Firewall, which provides stateful inspection, threat intelligence-based filtering, and centralized logging. All traffic between VNets or outbound to the internet passes through the hub, enabling consistent policy enforcement and monitoring.

Option B, direct VNet Peering, establishes private connectivity between VNets but does not provide a centralized inspection or security point. Peering multiple VNets in a mesh topology becomes operationally complex, and security policies must be enforced individually on each VNet, increasing the risk of misconfiguration.

Option C, Application Gateway with WAF, protects web applications by inspecting HTTP/HTTPS traffic and preventing common attacks like SQL injection and XSS. However, it does not provide network-wide inspection for all traffic, making it unsuitable for enforcing centralized policies for inter-VNet communication or multi-protocol workloads.

Option D, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic among VMs but cannot enforce centralized security policies or inspect traffic. It is limited to layer 4 load balancing and does not offer traffic analysis or logging.

By implementing a hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall, organizations gain a single point for security enforcement, centralized monitoring, and operational simplicity. This architecture scales easily as new VNets are added, ensures consistent security policies, and supports auditing and compliance requirements. It also integrates with routing mechanisms to guarantee that traffic flows through the firewall, enabling threat detection and mitigation at a central point while maintaining high performance and reliability across the network. A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub provides a highly efficient and secure framework for managing multi-VNet environments, especially in large-scale or multi-region deployments. By centralizing security functions within the hub, organizations can enforce uniform policies across all connected spokes, ensuring that traffic adheres to corporate security standards regardless of the originating VNet. This centralization reduces administrative overhead and minimizes the chances of inconsistent configurations, which are common in decentralized or mesh-based VNet topologies.

Azure Firewall’s stateful inspection and threat intelligence-based filtering enhance security by detecting and mitigating malicious traffic, including both inbound and inter-VNet communication. Logging and monitoring capabilities provide deep visibility into network activity, enabling proactive threat detection, auditing, and compliance reporting. The architecture also supports integration with Azure Monitor and Security Center, allowing organizations to analyze network patterns, respond to anomalies, and maintain a strong security posture across cloud deployments.

From a scalability perspective, the hub-and-spoke model is highly adaptable. As new VNets or regions are added, they simply connect as spokes to the hub without requiring complex peering configurations. This reduces operational complexity and avoids the exponential growth of network connections that occurs in full mesh topologies. Routing can be centrally managed, ensuring that all traffic flows through the firewall, which allows for consistent application of policies, logging, and threat mitigation. Overall, this design balances security, manageability, and scalability, providing organizations with a resilient, compliant, and easily extensible network infrastructure capable of supporting hybrid and cloud-native workloads efficiently.

Question 33:

You need to implement global failover for an application deployed across multiple Azure regions while minimizing downtime. Which service should you use?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based traffic routing solution designed for global applications. It supports failover routing, directing users to the closest or healthiest endpoint if the primary region experiences downtime. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic to available endpoints, minimizing downtime and ensuring business continuity.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing within a region and supports URL-based routing and WAF. While it is effective for local high availability and application security, it does not support global failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and distributes traffic within a single region or VNet. It does not provide global routing or failover capabilities.

Option D, Azure Firewall, secures traffic but does not provide traffic distribution, failover, or endpoint routing. It is focused on inspection and policy enforcement rather than high availability for global applications.

By using Traffic Manager, organizations achieve global resiliency and low-latency access for users worldwide. It supports performance, geographic, and priority-based routing, ensuring that user traffic is directed to the optimal endpoint. Integration with monitoring and alerting allows administrators to detect regional failures quickly and take corrective actions. Traffic Manager ensures that applications remain accessible, improves user experience, and supports disaster recovery planning. Its DNS-based mechanism works seamlessly with regional load balancers or Application Gateways, creating a robust, globally distributed architecture with automatic failover and minimal operational complexity. Azure Traffic Manager plays a critical role in designing globally resilient applications by intelligently directing user traffic based on multiple routing methods. Beyond simple failover, it enables performance-based routing, sending users to the endpoint with the lowest latency, which improves response times and overall user experience. Geographic routing allows organizations to comply with data residency regulations by directing users from specific regions to designated endpoints, ensuring compliance while maintaining availability. Priority-based routing can also be configured, allowing organizations to define primary and secondary endpoints for controlled failover scenarios, which is essential for disaster recovery planning and business continuity.

Traffic Manager continuously monitors the health of all configured endpoints through configurable probes, ensuring that traffic is only sent to available and responsive locations. If an endpoint becomes unhealthy, Traffic Manager automatically reroutes traffic to alternative endpoints without requiring manual intervention, reducing downtime and operational overhead. Its DNS-based architecture allows seamless integration with Azure Load Balancers, Application Gateways, or on-premises endpoints, creating a flexible and scalable global network.

Additionally, Traffic Manager supports hybrid architectures, enabling organizations to direct traffic between cloud and on-premises environments efficiently. By combining Traffic Manager with local load balancing solutions, organizations can achieve layered redundancy—regional high availability paired with global failover. Monitoring and alerting integrations provide visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint performance, and failure events, enabling proactive response. Overall, Traffic Manager ensures high availability, optimized performance, and global reach, making it a cornerstone solution for enterprises deploying mission-critical applications across multiple regions.

Question 34:

You need to allow dynamic route updates between VNets and network appliances while maintaining a secure inspection point. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server enables dynamic route propagation between VNets, on-premises routers, and network virtual appliances (NVAs) using BGP. Route Server ensures that network routes are updated automatically whenever changes occur in the topology, reducing the risk of misconfiguration. It allows VNets and NVAs to communicate securely and efficiently without manual route entries, simplifying network management in complex architectures.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides site-to-site or point-to-site connectivity with static or BGP-based routing. While VPN Gateway supports dynamic routing to on-premises networks, it is less suited for multi-VNet and multi-appliance scenarios that require automated propagation across Azure.

Option C, ExpressRoute, offers private connectivity to Azure but does not dynamically propagate routes within VNets or to NVAs. Additional route configuration is required to ensure connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic filtering but cannot propagate routes dynamically. NSGs are security controls, not routing mechanisms.

By using Azure Route Server, enterprises can automate route management, integrate with inspection appliances, and maintain secure and consistent connectivity. This approach reduces operational overhead, ensures reliable routing across complex environments, and supports hybrid and multi-region topologies. It is ideal for large-scale deployments requiring centralized route control and dynamic adaptation to changes in network architecture. Route Server provides visibility into route distribution, simplifies troubleshooting, and enhances operational efficiency while maintaining security and compliance. Azure Route Server significantly enhances network agility and simplifies the management of complex hybrid and multi-VNet environments. Leveraging BGP for dynamic route propagation allows Azure VNets to automatically learn and advertise routes to on-premises routers and network virtual appliances (NVAs), eliminating the need for manual configuration. This dynamic capability is especially valuable in large-scale deployments where routes change frequently due to scaling, failover, or architectural updates. Without a Route Server, administrators would have to manually update route tables for each VNet and appliance, increasing the potential for errors and operational overhead.

Route Server also enables seamless integration with network virtual appliances, allowing enterprises to implement centralized security, inspection, and traffic management policies without disrupting connectivity. For example, traffic can be routed through firewalls or intrusion detection systems dynamically, with Route Server ensuring that route updates propagate automatically across VNets and connected networks. This reduces latency in implementing network changes and ensures that security and operational policies are consistently applied across the environment.

Moreover, Route Server improves visibility and troubleshooting capabilities. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, view propagated routes, and track changes across the network in real time. This transparency helps in diagnosing routing issues, planning expansions, and maintaining compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. By automating routing across hybrid and multi-region topologies, Azure Route Server delivers operational efficiency, enhanced network reliability, and scalable connectivity, making it an essential tool for enterprises with complex cloud networking needs.

Question 35:

You need to provide secure, centralized access for administrators to manage Azure VMs without assigning public IP addresses. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Bastion
B) VPN Gateway
C) NSGs
D) Load Balancer

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Bastion is a fully managed service that allows secure RDP and SSH access to Azure VMs through the Azure portal without exposing them to the public internet. Bastion connections are encrypted via SSL, removing the need for public IPs and reducing the attack surface. It supports multiple sessions, integrates with NSGs and Azure Monitor, and scales automatically to handle increased traffic. Bastion logs all administrative activity, supporting compliance and auditing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, enables secure connectivity but requires client configuration and public network access, making it less seamless for administrative tasks. It is better suited for hybrid connectivity scenarios.

Option C, NSGs, filter traffic, but cannot provide remote access. They are security enforcement tools and do not enable RDP or SSH connectivity.

Option D, Load Balancer, distributes traffic but does not provide secure administrative access. It cannot handle encrypted remote management sessions.

Deploying Azure Bastion ensures centralized, secure, and auditable access for administrators while eliminating exposure of VMs to the public internet. It simplifies operational management, enhances security, and supports compliance. Bastion provides a secure bridge for remote VM management, minimizes risks of brute-force attacks, integrates with monitoring for logging, and allows organizations to maintain strong governance and operational excellence across their Azure environment. Azure Bastion provides a robust and secure solution for managing virtual machines in Azure without the risks associated with exposing them to the public internet. By enabling RDP and SSH connectivity directly through the Azure portal, it eliminates the need for administrators to manage public IP addresses or configure VPN clients for every session. This not only reduces the attack surface but also simplifies operational procedures, especially in environments with multiple VMs or frequent administrative tasks. Bastion’s SSL-based encryption ensures that all remote sessions are protected against eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks, reinforcing the security posture of the organization.

Beyond secure access, Azure Bastion offers scalability and integration capabilities that enhance enterprise management. It automatically scales to handle multiple simultaneous sessions, ensuring performance is maintained during peak administrative periods. Integration with Network Security Groups (NSGs) allows organizations to enforce granular traffic policies while still permitting secure access through Bastion. Additionally, Bastion logs all session activity, supporting compliance requirements, auditing, and forensic investigations.

For organizations with strict regulatory or governance requirements, Bastion minimizes operational risks by centralizing access management and removing the need for public-facing endpoints. Administrators can securely connect from anywhere, monitor session activity, and manage VMs without additional network configuration. Its seamless integration with Azure Monitor enables real-time visibility into access patterns and potential security events, supporting proactive threat detection. Overall, Azure Bastion enhances security, simplifies remote management, and ensures regulatory compliance, making it an essential tool for secure, auditable, and efficient VM administration in Azure.

Question 36:

You need to implement centralized DNS resolution for multiple VNets in Azure while reducing latency and ensuring high availability. Which service should you deploy?

A) Azure Private DNS Zones
B) VNet Peering
C) Azure Firewall
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Private DNS Zones provide a centralized and highly available solution for name resolution within Azure VNets. By using private DNS zones, multiple VNets can share a consistent DNS namespace, ensuring that internal services are reachable across VNets without relying on external DNS servers. Private DNS Zones support automatic registration of virtual machines’ hostnames, reducing administrative overhead and the potential for misconfigurations.

Option B, VNet Peering, enables private IP connectivity between VNets, but it does not provide DNS resolution. While peering allows VNets to communicate directly, resolving hostnames across VNets still requires DNS, either via Azure-provided DNS, custom DNS, or private DNS zones. Relying solely on VNet peering for name resolution would result in operational complexity, higher latency, and possible errors in multi-VNet environments.

Option C, Azure Firewall, provides security enforcement and centralized traffic inspection but does not offer DNS services. It can integrate with DNS for filtering or logging purposes, but it is not a DNS resolution mechanism and cannot centralize DNS across multiple VNets by itself.

Option D, Application Gateway, operates at layer 7 to route HTTP/HTTPS traffic and protect applications with WAF capabilities. While it can resolve domain names for backend routing purposes, it is not a DNS solution for inter-VNet name resolution and cannot provide centralized, high-availability DNS management.

By deploying Azure Private DNS Zones, organizations achieve centralized name resolution that is scalable, low-latency, and highly available. VNets can link to private DNS zones for consistent hostname resolution across resources, supporting hybrid and multi-VNet environments. This architecture reduces administrative overhead, simplifies network configuration, improves application connectivity reliability, and ensures that internal communication between services is consistent and secure. Integration with Azure Monitor allows tracking of DNS queries for auditing and operational insights, which is essential for maintaining enterprise-grade network governance and compliance standards. Azure Private DNS Zones offer a foundational service for managing name resolution in complex, multi-VNet, and hybrid environments. By centralizing DNS management, organizations can maintain a single, authoritative namespace for internal resources, which significantly simplifies network administration. Automatic registration of virtual machines’ hostnames ensures that newly deployed resources are immediately discoverable without manual updates, reducing the likelihood of misconfigurations or communication failures between services. This automation is particularly valuable in dynamic cloud environments where resources are frequently scaled up or down.

In multi-VNet deployments, linking VNets to a private DNS zone allows seamless name resolution across different network segments. This approach eliminates the need for custom DNS forwarding rules or reliance on external DNS servers, which could introduce latency or points of failure. Additionally, private DNS zones integrate well with hybrid architectures, allowing on-premises resources to resolve Azure internal hostnames through VPN or ExpressRoute connections. This enables consistent internal communication regardless of where workloads reside, improving operational reliability and application performance.

Private DNS zones also enhance security and governance. By keeping DNS traffic within the Azure backbone, organizations avoid exposing internal name resolution to the public internet, mitigating risks associated with DNS attacks. Logging and monitoring integrations with Azure Monitor provide insights into query patterns, helping administrators troubleshoot issues, track usage, and ensure compliance with enterprise policies. Overall, Azure Private DNS Zones enable a highly available, scalable, and secure internal DNS solution that supports robust enterprise networking, reduces administrative overhead, and ensures consistent connectivity across VNets and hybrid environments.

Question 37:

You need to implement network segmentation for multiple applications within the same VNet while applying security policies at the subnet level. Which solution is most appropriate?

A) Network Security Groups (NSGs)
B) Azure Firewall
C) Application Gateway
D) Load Balancer

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Network Security Groups (NSGs) are designed to enforce network segmentation and control traffic at both the subnet and network interface levels. By defining inbound and outbound rules, NSGs can restrict which subnets or VMs can communicate with each other, enabling segmentation for different applications or tiers within the same VNet. This approach allows administrators to implement zero-trust principles, isolate sensitive workloads, and reduce the attack surface.

Option B, Azure Firewall, provides centralized inspection and filtering across VNets but is more suited for hub-and-spoke architectures and high-throughput traffic control. Firewall policies typically enforce rules across multiple VNets or subnets rather than per-application segmentation within a single VNet. Deploying Azure Firewall for subnet-level segmentation is possible, but it may introduce unnecessary complexity and cost for small-scale segmentation requirements.

Option C, Application Gateway, operates at layer 7 and is ideal for routing HTTP/HTTPS traffic or protecting web applications with WAF. It does not enforce subnet-level segmentation for non-HTTP workloads or provide granular security for all traffic types within a VNet.

Option D, Load Balancer, distributes network traffic to backend resources but does not control or enforce security policies. It is not a segmentation tool and does not inspect or filter traffic between subnets.

Implementing NSGs ensures precise control over intra-VNet communication. Administrators can create rules based on source/destination IPs, ports, and protocols, defining allow or deny actions. This provides a scalable and flexible approach to network security, aligning with security frameworks such as NIST or CIS. NSGs can be combined with Azure Firewall for layered security, where NSGs provide segmentation at the subnet level, and Azure Firewall enforces centralized policies for outbound or cross-VNet traffic. This layered approach improves defense in depth, reduces lateral movement, and ensures compliance while maintaining operational flexibility. Network Security Groups (NSGs) are a cornerstone of Azure’s micro-segmentation strategy, allowing organizations to enforce fine-grained traffic control within a VNet. By applying rules at both the subnet and network interface levels, NSGs enable administrators to isolate workloads, implement least-privilege network access, and protect sensitive applications from unintended exposure. This is especially important in multi-tier architectures, where different layers of an application—such as web, application, and database tiers—require controlled communication patterns. NSGs allow explicit definition of allowed or denied traffic based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols, ensuring that only authorized traffic flows between components.

NSGs also support dynamic and scalable environments. As new virtual machines or subnets are deployed, rules can automatically apply to new resources, maintaining consistent security without manual updates. Administrators can define default rules for baseline protection while adding custom rules for specific workloads or applications, balancing security and operational flexibility. Integration with monitoring and logging tools, such as Azure Monitor and Network Watcher, provides visibility into traffic flows, rule hits, and denied connections. This allows proactive detection of misconfigurations, policy violations, or potential security threats.

Combining NSGs with Azure Firewall creates a layered security model. NSGs enforce segmentation at the granular level, restricting lateral movement within the VNet, while Azure Firewall provides centralized inspection, logging, and outbound filtering. This dual-layer approach enhances defense in depth, supporting regulatory compliance frameworks such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Overall, NSGs provide a flexible, scalable, and effective mechanism for securing intra-VNet communication, protecting sensitive workloads, and supporting operational excellence in Azure network architectures.

Question 38:

You need to optimize latency and route traffic efficiently between multiple VNets and on-premises networks while maintaining a central point for inspection and policy enforcement. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub
B) Direct VNet Peering between all VNets
C) Application Gateway with WAF in each VNet
D) Standard Load Balancer across VNets

Answer:
A

Explanation:

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub is the optimal design for multi-VNet and hybrid connectivity. In this setup, all spoke VNets route their traffic through a central hub containing Azure Firewall. This architecture ensures that traffic is inspected, security policies are enforced, and routing is consistent across multiple VNets and on-premises networks. By centralizing inspection, organizations maintain operational control, reduce administrative complexity, and ensure that all traffic passes through a managed point for compliance monitoring and threat mitigation.

Option B, direct VNet Peering, allows low-latency connectivity between VNets but does not provide centralized inspection or policy enforcement. A full mesh of peerings can become operationally complex, and security policies must be applied individually, increasing the risk of misconfiguration and inconsistent enforcement.

Option C, Application Gateway with WAF, protects HTTP/HTTPS workloads at layer 7 but does not enforce security policies for all network traffic. It cannot act as a central inspection point for non-web traffic or inter-VNet communication.

Option D, Standard Load Balancer, provides high availability and distributes traffic, but does not offer security inspection or policy enforcement. It operates at layer 4 and does not inspect packet contents or enforce application-specific policies.

By using a hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall, organizations achieve centralized security and inspection for all traffic between VNets and on-premises networks. Traffic flows through the hub, ensuring consistent routing and policy enforcement. Azure Firewall supports threat intelligence-based filtering, application and network rules, and full logging, providing visibility and compliance monitoring. This architecture is scalable, supports high availability, and simplifies management as new VNets or workloads are added. It ensures that performance and security are balanced, enabling optimized latency while maintaining enterprise-grade security standards.

Question 39:

You need to provide secure remote management for Azure VMs without exposing them to public IP addresses, while enabling multiple administrators to connect simultaneously. Which service should you deploy?

A) Azure Bastion
B) VPN Gateway
C) NSGs
D) Load Balancer

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Bastion provides secure RDP and SSH access to Azure VMs through the Azure portal without requiring public IP addresses. It allows multiple administrators to connect concurrently using SSL, reducing the attack surface and eliminating the need for traditional VPNs or jump boxes. Bastion ensures that sessions are encrypted, centrally managed, and auditable, supporting compliance and operational requirements.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted network connectivity but requires client configuration and public internet exposure for remote administration. It is better suited for hybrid connectivity rather than seamless VM management.

Option C, NSGs, are security enforcement tools that filter traffic but do not provide remote management or access capabilities. They cannot facilitate RDP/SSH connections or centralize access for administrators.

Option D, Load Balancer, distributes traffic to backend VMs but does not provide secure administrative access. It cannot handle encrypted remote management sessions.

Implementing Azure Bastion centralizes VM access, ensures secure connections without public IPs, and supports multiple concurrent sessions. Administrators benefit from reduced operational risk, simplified access management, and integration with Azure Monitor for session logging. Bastion is essential for enterprises seeking to minimize exposure, enforce security policies, and provide reliable, auditable remote access across cloud workloads. It eliminates the complexity of managing VPNs or jump servers, enhancing operational efficiency while maintaining enterprise-grade security and compliance standards.

Question 40:

You need to implement a solution that provides centralized routing and automated route updates between multiple VNets and network appliances while ensuring high availability. Which service should you implement?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server allows dynamic route propagation between Azure VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers using BGP. By automatically updating routing tables, Route Server eliminates manual route configuration, reduces misconfiguration risks, and ensures consistent connectivity. It is particularly useful in multi-VNet and hybrid topologies where NVAs provide inspection, security, or advanced routing services.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing via BGP but is primarily designed for site-to-site or point-to-site connections. It is less suitable for large-scale multi-VNet architectures with centralized inspection and automated route propagation.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity to Azure with predictable performance but does not inherently propagate routes dynamically between VNets or NVAs. Manual configuration or integration with the Route Server is required for automated routing.

Option D, NSGs, enforce security policies but do not handle routing. They are critical for network security, but cannot propagate routes automatically or centralize routing management.

By deploying Azure Route Server, organizations can automate route management, integrate with inspection appliances, maintain high availability, and simplify operational complexity in hybrid or multi-VNet networks. It ensures accurate route propagation, supports dynamic network changes, and enhances security by maintaining consistent routing paths through inspection points. Route Server provides visibility, monitoring, and integration with logging services for operational intelligence, making it a foundational component in enterprise-grade, scalable Azure network architectures.

Question 41:

You need to ensure that multiple VNets can communicate securely with on-premises networks while allowing automatic route propagation and redundancy. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) VPN Gateway with BGP enabled
B) ExpressRoute
C) NSGs
D) Azure Load Balancer

Answer:
A

Explanation:

VPN Gateway with BGP enabled provides secure site-to-site connectivity between Azure VNets and on-premises networks, supporting automatic route propagation through Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). By enabling BGP, routes are dynamically updated as network topologies change, which reduces manual configuration and minimizes the risk of routing errors. This solution allows multiple VNets to communicate with on-premises networks securely, while redundancy is achieved through active-active VPN Gateway configurations, ensuring high availability.

Option B, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity with predictable performance and high bandwidth. While it is ideal for hybrid networks requiring private links, it does not inherently manage dynamic routing between multiple VNets or automatically propagate routes without additional configuration and integration with routing solutions. ExpressRoute is more suited for high-performance connectivity rather than dynamic multi-VNet routing.

Option C, NSGs, enforce network security rules but cannot provide secure communication or manage route propagation. They control traffic flows within and between VNets, but are not a connectivity solution.

Option D, Azure Load Balancer, distributes traffic across VMs or services for high availability, but it does not provide hybrid connectivity or dynamic route management. It is a local traffic distribution tool rather than a solution for secure inter-VNet or on-premises communication.

Using VPN Gateway with BGP ensures encrypted connectivity between VNets and on-premises networks, supports high availability and redundancy, and simplifies route management. BGP allows automatic adjustment of routing in response to network changes, reducing operational overhead and improving network resiliency. Organizations can securely integrate cloud and on-premises environments, enforce traffic control policies, and maintain seamless connectivity for critical applications. This approach aligns with best practices for enterprise-scale hybrid deployments, balancing performance, security, and operational efficiency.

Question 42:

You need to provide centralized inspection and filtering of outbound traffic from multiple VNets while maintaining high availability and scalability. Which Azure service is most appropriate?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Application Gateway
D) Standard Load Balancer

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service that provides centralized inspection and filtering of both inbound and outbound traffic across multiple VNets. It enables organizations to define network and application rules, enforce security policies, and monitor traffic from a central location. Azure Firewall supports high availability with built-in redundancy and scales automatically to handle increasing traffic loads, ensuring continuous protection without manual intervention.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but are decentralized and cannot inspect traffic deeply or filter application-level requests. Managing outbound filtering across multiple VNets using only NSGs would be complex and error-prone. NSGs are better suited for segmentation and basic access control rather than centralized traffic inspection.

Option C, Application Gateway, protects web applications and provides layer 7 traffic management with a Web Application Firewall (WAF). It is not designed for network-wide traffic inspection or filtering of non-HTTP/HTTPS traffic, limiting its applicability for centralized outbound control.

Option D, Standard Load Balancer, ensures high availability for backend services but does not provide traffic inspection or policy enforcement. It is limited to distributing layer 4 traffic and cannot enforce security rules.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows organizations to enforce consistent security policies, monitor traffic centrally, and detect threats using threat intelligence-based filtering. Logs and metrics can be integrated with Azure Monitor and Log Analytics to provide comprehensive visibility, auditing, and compliance support. By centralizing inspection, organizations reduce the risk of misconfigurations, improve operational efficiency, and enhance security posture. Azure Firewall is ideal for scenarios requiring scalable, high-availability, and enterprise-grade security enforcement across multiple VNets.

Question 43:

You need to route traffic between multiple VNets and on-premises networks dynamically while allowing integration with network appliances for inspection. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server enables dynamic route propagation between Azure VNets, on-premises routers, and network virtual appliances (NVAs) using BGP. This solution eliminates manual route updates, reduces the potential for misconfigurations, and allows integration with inspection appliances to ensure that all traffic is analyzed for security or policy compliance. Route Server supports highly available configurations and simplifies multi-VNet connectivity in hybrid environments.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP for site-to-site connections but is less flexible for large-scale multi-VNet topologies with multiple inspection points. VPN Gateway is ideal for hybrid connectivity, but does not provide centralized routing integration with NVAs.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity to Azure but does not propagate routes dynamically within VNets or integrate automatically with NVAs. Manual configuration is required to ensure routing, making it less suitable for dynamic route management.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not propagate routes. They are essential for network segmentation and access control, but cannot provide centralized route management or integration with inspection appliances.

Using Azure Route Server ensures reliable, automated routing across complex network topologies, integrates with NVAs for inspection, and reduces administrative complexity. It provides operational visibility into route propagation, supports hybrid scenarios, and maintains consistent connectivity between VNets and on-premises environments. Route Server allows organizations to scale network infrastructure efficiently, improve security posture, and maintain high availability while ensuring routes are dynamically updated as network changes occur. This approach aligns with enterprise best practices for network design in Azure.

Question 44:

You need to provide secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and multiple Azure VNets with predictable latency and private links. Which solution should you implement?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides private, dedicated network connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Unlike VPN connections over the public internet, ExpressRoute offers predictable latency, higher bandwidth, and enterprise-grade reliability. It supports multiple VNets through peering, allows private IP address communication, and is suitable for high-performance workloads requiring consistent network performance. ExpressRoute can also integrate with Microsoft’s global network, ensuring minimal latency between geographically distributed locations.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connections over the public internet. While it ensures security, it cannot provide predictable performance, high bandwidth, or enterprise-grade reliability compared to ExpressRoute. VPN connections may experience variable latency and are not ideal for mission-critical applications with high throughput requirements.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure remote access to VMs without public IPs but does not facilitate network connectivity or routing between on-premises and Azure VNets. It is designed for administrative access rather than hybrid network connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide private connectivity, high performance, or guaranteed latency. They are security enforcement tools rather than connectivity solutions.

Deploying ExpressRoute allows organizations to meet performance, reliability, and security requirements for hybrid cloud deployments. It supports scalable, predictable connectivity, integration with multiple VNets, and compliance with regulatory requirements. ExpressRoute simplifies network management by providing private, dedicated paths for data transfer, improving application performance and user experience. It is ideal for enterprises requiring high-availability hybrid networks with consistent latency and throughput. Integration with monitoring tools allows visibility into network performance, capacity planning, and proactive issue resolution.

Question 45:

You need to ensure global traffic distribution for a multi-region application while directing users to the closest healthy endpoint to optimize performance and minimize latency. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based traffic routing service that directs users to the closest or healthiest endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, geographic, priority, and weighted routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic if an endpoint becomes unavailable, ensuring high availability and minimal latency for end-users.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides regional layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities but does not support global endpoint routing or DNS-based failover across multiple regions. It is effective for HTTP/HTTPS traffic within a region, but cannot optimize global user performance.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and distributes traffic within a single region. It does not provide global endpoint selection, failover, or routing optimization based on performance.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not route traffic globally or optimize performance for end-users. Its primary function is network security enforcement rather than traffic distribution.

Using Azure Traffic Manager, organizations can ensure users are directed to the most optimal endpoint, improving application responsiveness and availability. Integration with monitoring and alerting provides operational visibility into endpoint health, enabling proactive mitigation of issues. Traffic Manager supports enterprise-grade global applications by providing failover, load distribution, and performance optimization, ensuring a seamless experience for users worldwide. It is an essential component for multi-region deployments that require low latency, high availability, and intelligent traffic management.