Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 15 Q211-225

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 211:

You need to establish secure, high-throughput connectivity between multiple VNets in different Azure regions for a distributed application while keeping all traffic within Microsoft’s backbone network. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables private connectivity between VNets across different Azure regions using Microsoft’s backbone network. This connectivity ensures that all traffic between VNets remains isolated from the public internet, enhancing security and reducing potential exposure to external threats. It provides low-latency, high-throughput communication, which is crucial for distributed applications that rely on multiple tiers hosted in separate VNets across regions.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the internet. While it secures data in transit, it introduces variability in latency and throughput because traffic traverses public networks. VPN Gateway requires ongoing management, multiple tunnels for multi-VNet connections, and continuous monitoring, which increases operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed for private connectivity between on-premises environments and Azure VNets. Using ExpressRoute solely for VNet-to-VNet communication adds unnecessary cost and complexity without providing additional benefits over Global VNet Peering in this scenario.

Option D, NSGs, enforce network access control but do not provide connectivity. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering by enforcing traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level, but cannot replace the underlying network connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, reliable, and high-performance inter-VNet connectivity. It supports multi-region architectures, disaster recovery setups, and hub-and-spoke designs. Combining it with NSGs allows granular traffic control while maintaining simplicity, high performance, and security, aligning with enterprise best practices for global cloud networking. Global VNet Peering is the most effective and operationally efficient method for connecting virtual networks located in different Azure regions when the goal is to achieve seamless, high-performance, and private communication without exposing traffic to the public internet. The design of this capability ensures that communication between peered VNets uses the internal Microsoft backbone, which is engineered for extremely low latency, high bandwidth, and consistent performance regardless of global distance. This makes Global VNet Peering highly suitable for scenarios such as cross-region application deployments, geo-distributed microservices, multi-region failover architectures, and disaster recovery patterns that rely on fast and predictable replication or synchronization traffic. In addition to performance benefits, the private nature of the backbone network significantly reduces the attack surface by eliminating the need for internet-routed traffic, meaning that threats such as DDoS attacks or routing hijacks are inherently mitigated.

In contrast to overlay or tunnel-based connectivity solutions, Global VNet Peering introduces very little administrative overhead because it does not require gateways, shared routing appliances, or session management. Once the peering relationship is established, the virtual networks operate almost as if they are part of the same private network space from the perspective of connectivity behavior. Routing is automatically handled, and there is no need to maintain BGP sessions or manage tunnel failover. This simplicity is especially valuable in enterprise environments where large numbers of VNets must be linked across regions to support isolated workloads, tiered architectures, or large hub-and-spoke topologies. The automatic handling of routes through peering ensures that traffic flows directly through Azure’s fabric rather than through bottlenecks or central choke points, which helps maintain optimal performance for east-west traffic.

VPN Gateway, while secure and reliable for encrypted communication, relies on the public internet and introduces operational limitations that do not align with the requirements of high-performance inter-VNet traffic. The dependency on IPsec tunnels means throughput is capped by gateway SKU limits, tunnel counts, and the overhead of encryption and decryption. Latency fluctuates based on external internet conditions, which can negatively impact tightly coupled services such as distributed caching, real-time processing pipelines, or interdependent microservices. Additionally, managing multiple gateways for multi-region connectivity adds complexity that grows with the size of the environment, requiring monitoring, maintenance, failover testing, and lifecycle operations that Global VNet Peering avoids entirely.

ExpressRoute provides private connectivity but is engineered for hybrid cloud use cases where organizations need private circuits between Azure and their on-premises data centers. Using ExpressRoute exclusively for communication between VNets is not cost-effective because it adds unnecessary components, such as the ExpressRoute circuit and the provider edge connectivity, which introduce both additional expense and operational overhead. While ExpressRoute Global Reach can connect on-premises environments across regions, it is not intended to replace the inherent simplicity and native performance advantages of Global VNet Peering for VNet-to-VNet communication within Azure.

Network Security Groups complement but do not replace the underlying connectivity mechanism. While they are essential for governing which traffic is allowed or denied, they operate at a policy layer rather than at the transport or connection layer. Their role is to refine and secure traffic once the connection path already exists. When combined with Global VNet Peering, NSGs offer fine-grained control that helps enforce segmentation principles, ensuring that even though VNets can communicate privately and efficiently, only approved flows are permitted. This balance of performance, simplicity, and robust security posture makes Global VNet Peering the most appropriate choice for enterprise-grade multi-region VNet connectivity.

Question 212:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets, integrate threat intelligence, and ensure automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service that centralizes traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence across multiple VNets. It supports network and application rules, enabling granular control of traffic. Integration with threat intelligence allows it to block known malicious IPs and domains, enhancing security proactively. The service is highly available and scales automatically to handle traffic increases, ensuring uninterrupted policy enforcement.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. They complement Azure Firewall for granular control but lack the capabilities required for enterprise-wide inspection and automated scaling.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 without inspecting traffic content or enforcing security policies. It cannot provide threat intelligence integration, centralized inspection, or automatic scaling for security purposes.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities for HTTP/HTTPS traffic. However, it is limited to web traffic and cannot enforce centralized security policies or inspect all outbound traffic across multiple VNets.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows enterprises to implement a consistent, proactive security strategy, combining centralized policy enforcement, threat intelligence, high availability, and automated scaling. It reduces operational overhead, ensures compliance, and supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures. Organizations gain enterprise-grade security, operational efficiency, and scalable protection for critical workloads across Azure. Azure Firewall is well-suited for environments that require a unified, enterprise-grade approach to securing traffic across a wide range of networks, applications, and workloads hosted in the cloud. Its ability to act as a central inspection and policy enforcement point is particularly important in architectures where traffic from multiple application tiers, isolated VNets, or hybrid environments must be governed by consistent rules. Unlike decentralized controls, Azure Firewall provides a single location where administrators can define, audit, and update security policies, ensuring that every workload connected through the hub is protected with the same level of scrutiny. This reduces the risk of misaligned or incomplete configurations, which are common in distributed systems and can expose organizations to vulnerabilities or compliance gaps. Because Azure Firewall operates as a stateful firewall, it tracks the context of traffic flows, allowing it to make more intelligent decisions about what traffic should be allowed or denied based on established sessions rather than just individual packets.

Another strength of Azure Firewall is its ability to scale without manual intervention. Cloud workloads often grow unpredictably, and traffic patterns may shift rapidly depending on user demand, time of day, or application behavior. Traditional firewall appliances struggle under such conditions because they require administrators to size appliances ahead of time, plan for peak load, and manage hardware or virtual appliance limits. Azure Firewall eliminates all of that by scaling elastically as traffic increases, ensuring sustained protection without degradation in performance. This dynamic scaling is essential for modern applications that rely on global reach or support thousands of concurrent connections distributed across multiple Azure regions.

Azure Firewall Premium enhances capabilities even further with advanced threat detection, TLS inspection, and signature-based intrusion prevention. These features enable deeper analysis of traffic, detecting attacks or anomalies that would otherwise go unnoticed in environments protected only by basic packet filtering. For organizations operating under strict regulatory guidelines or industry frameworks that require advanced monitoring and threat prevention, this deeper inspection capability plays a pivotal role in maintaining a secure cloud footprint. By integrating with Microsoft’s security ecosystem, Azure Firewall also receives continuous updates, making it resilient against newly identified threats without requiring manual updates or rule adjustments.

In contrast, NSGs provide important but limited controls. They are designed for lightweight filtering close to the workload, not for enterprise-wide traffic governance. NSGs cannot inspect traffic content, enforce threat intelligence, or centralize policy management. While they are a critical component for micro-segmentation, they lack the strategic oversight required for large-scale security designs. NSGs should be viewed as complementary rather than competing tools because they enforce local control while Azure Firewall enforces global control.

Standard Load Balancer performs traffic distribution but has no responsibility for security inspection or policy enforcement, making it unsuitable as a primary security solution. It simply routes traffic based on existing rules without evaluating whether the traffic is safe or malicious. Application Gateway provides more intelligent routing for web applications and includes a web application firewall, but its scope is limited to HTTP/S protocols. Enterprises with diverse workloads need a solution that operates across all protocols, ports, and network paths, which is beyond the capabilities of Application Gateway.

With Azure Firewall at the center of a hub-and-spoke model, organizations can route all outbound, inbound, and east–west traffic through a consistent security layer. This ensures visibility into all traffic flows, simplifies audits, supports zero-trust principles, and allows rapid policy rollout across multiple environments. As organizations expand workloads across multiple regions or adopt hybrid connectivity with on-premises data centers, having a single, scalable enforcement point becomes even more crucial. Azure Firewall provides the operational consistency, threat intelligence, adaptability, and centralized security governance necessary to protect enterprise-class cloud environments effectively and efficiently.

Question 213:

You need to propagate routes dynamically across VNets and integrate network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement while minimizing manual route management. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server provides automated route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This automation reduces manual route configuration, prevents errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex enterprise networks. NVAs integrated with Route Server enable centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining compliance and security across multiple VNets. Route Server supports multi-region and hub-and-spoke architectures, making it highly scalable and operationally efficient.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP and dynamic routing but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet routing with VPN Gateway requires manual configuration, monitoring, and maintenance, increasing operational complexity and the potential for misconfiguration.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises and Azure networks but does not automate route propagation or integrate NVAs. Manual route management is required, which increases operational overhead.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or provide centralized inspection. They complement the Route Server by enforcing access policies, but cannot replace routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable routing while integrating NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises benefit from operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. It minimizes configuration errors, supports hybrid and multi-region deployments, and aligns with best practices for secure, maintainable, and scalable cloud network architectures. Azure Route Server is a critical service for enterprises that require seamless, scalable, and automated routing in complex Azure network architectures. Modern cloud environments often consist of multiple VNets, hybrid connections with on-premises data centers, and distributed services that span different regions. Managing routes manually in such environments is both error-prone and operationally intensive. Each time a VNet is added, removed, or modified, administrators must update route tables, ensure consistency, and verify that network traffic flows as intended. Misconfigurations in routing can lead to network outages, application downtime, or unintended exposure of sensitive workloads. Azure Route Server eliminates much of this complexity by automatically propagating routes between VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). This automated propagation ensures that every device or VNet in the network has an accurate and up-to-date view of the topology, significantly reducing the likelihood of misconfigurations and operational errors.

One of the most significant advantages of Azure Route Server is its integration with NVAs, which allows centralized traffic inspection, monitoring, and policy enforcement. NVAs, which can include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, or traffic analyzers, benefit from accurate, dynamically propagated routing information to make informed decisions about traffic flows. By combining automated route propagation with NVAs, enterprises gain visibility and control over traffic patterns, enabling advanced security measures such as deep packet inspection, segmentation enforcement, or anomaly detection across all VNets. This centralized enforcement model is much more efficient than attempting to manage policies on each VNet individually, which can be cumbersome and inconsistent. Moreover, the integration ensures that all traffic adheres to corporate compliance requirements, regulatory mandates, and internal security policies, thereby enhancing both operational and security governance.

Azure Route Server also excels in supporting multi-region and hub-and-spoke topologies, which are common in enterprise networks. In a hub-and-spoke design, VNets are typically segmented by function, department, or environment, with the hub VNet acting as the central point of connectivity and management. Manually configuring routes between each spoke and the hub, or between spokes in different regions, can quickly become unmanageable as the number of VNets grows. Azure Route Server automatically learns and propagates routes, ensuring that each spoke has proper connectivity without requiring manual intervention. This allows organizations to scale their network effortlessly, add new VNets, or extend into new regions without worrying about the time-consuming process of route updates or the risk of misconfigured paths.

Another critical benefit is operational efficiency. Enterprises can significantly reduce the administrative overhead associated with managing large-scale networks. Traditional approaches to dynamic routing involve configuring BGP sessions individually for each connection, maintaining route tables, and continuously monitoring for changes or failures. Each of these steps requires specialized knowledge and constant vigilance. Azure Route Server automates most of these tasks, freeing up network administrators to focus on higher-value activities such as performance optimization, security policy design, or business-critical application deployment. Automated health monitoring and route updates also enhance network resilience, ensuring that if a VNet, NVA, or on-premises router becomes unavailable, alternative paths are quickly learned and traffic is rerouted with minimal disruption.

When compared to other options, Route Server provides unique capabilities. VPN Gateway can support BGP and dynamic routing, but lacks the integration with NVAs and centralized route management, meaning administrators still need to manually configure multi-VNet scenarios or manage route tables across regions. ExpressRoute, while providing private, dedicated connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, does not offer automated route propagation or dynamic integration with NVAs, so route updates still require manual management. NSGs provide essential network access control at the subnet or NIC level but do not handle routing or path propagation. In complex, multi-VNet, multi-region, or hybrid scenarios, relying solely on NSGs or VPN Gateway would result in higher operational complexity, more frequent errors, and slower reaction times during network changes.

Azure Route Server also plays a key role in hybrid cloud deployments. Organizations that maintain on-premises data centers alongside Azure workloads often face challenges in maintaining synchronized routing between environments. Azure Route Server can propagate routes from Azure VNets to on-premises routers via BGP, ensuring that hybrid traffic follows optimal paths without requiring manual configuration. This is particularly beneficial in disaster recovery scenarios or when running latency-sensitive applications that require predictable network paths.

In summary, deploying Azure Route Server provides enterprises with a reliable, automated, and scalable routing framework that supports complex, multi-region, and hybrid network topologies. It enhances operational efficiency by reducing manual configuration, minimizes the potential for routing errors, ensures compliance and security through NVA integration, and allows networks to scale dynamically as business needs evolve. By centralizing routing intelligence and combining it with traffic inspection and policy enforcement, Azure Route Server delivers a holistic solution that aligns with best practices for maintainable, secure, and high-performing cloud networks, enabling organizations to focus on innovation rather than network management.

Question 214:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets for enterprise workloads that require predictable performance and operational reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute delivers dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, essential for mission-critical workloads such as enterprise databases, analytics pipelines, and financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region deployments, enabling scalable and reliable hybrid cloud architectures.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity. While secure, VPN Gateway is subject to variable latency and limited bandwidth, making it unsuitable for performance-sensitive workloads. It also requires additional management for multi-VNet or multi-region scenarios.

Option C, Azure Bastion, allows secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs, but does not provide high-throughput, low-latency connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or performance guarantees. They complement ExpressRoute but cannot replace high-performance private connectivity.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity for critical workloads. It bypasses the public internet, enhancing reliability, security, and operational efficiency. ExpressRoute integrates with monitoring tools for performance tracking and capacity planning, supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and hybrid workloads, adhering to enterprise best practices for hybrid cloud networking.ExpressRoute is specifically designed to provide enterprises with a private, dedicated network connection between their on-premises infrastructure and Azure, offering a level of performance, reliability, and security that cannot be achieved through standard internet-based connections. The primary advantage of ExpressRoute lies in its ability to bypass the public internet entirely, which eliminates exposure to internet congestion, routing inconsistencies, and security vulnerabilities commonly associated with public connectivity. This private path ensures extremely low latency and high throughput, making it ideal for latency-sensitive applications, large-scale data transfers, real-time analytics, or financial transactions that require predictable network performance. Unlike VPN-based solutions that rely on the public internet, ExpressRoute provides deterministic network behavior, which is critical when consistent performance is essential for business continuity and compliance with service-level agreements.

Another significant benefit of ExpressRoute is its support for complex hybrid architectures. Enterprises frequently run a combination of on-premises systems and cloud workloads, such as legacy applications, databases, and high-performance computing clusters that need to interact seamlessly with Azure services. ExpressRoute enables these hybrid deployments by providing a high-capacity, low-latency bridge that can carry large volumes of traffic securely between environments. This capability is especially valuable for scenarios like database replication, disaster recovery, and multi-region failover, where traffic performance directly impacts application reliability and user experience. Because ExpressRoute connections can be configured for redundancy and multiple routing options, organizations can ensure uninterrupted connectivity even in the event of a failure, further enhancing operational resilience.

ExpressRoute also scales effectively to meet the needs of enterprise workloads. It supports connectivity to multiple VNets and multiple regions, allowing large organizations to implement global architectures without the complexity of managing multiple independent network links. The service integrates with Azure’s routing and network monitoring capabilities, giving administrators the ability to track performance, plan capacity, and optimize network paths proactively. This visibility into network health and traffic patterns allows enterprises to anticipate bottlenecks, plan for peak loads, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications.

From a security perspective, ExpressRoute complements other network controls like Network Security Groups (NSGs) and Azure Firewalls by providing a secure transport layer that is isolated from internet-based threats. While NSGs and firewalls control access and inspect traffic, ExpressRoute ensures that sensitive data flows through a private network, reducing the attack surface and minimizing the risk of interception or exposure. This separation from the public internet is crucial for organizations handling regulated data, such as financial records, healthcare information, or proprietary intellectual property.

Unlike Azure Bastion, which primarily provides secure remote management access to VMs, ExpressRoute focuses on high-performance connectivity for production workloads, ensuring that enterprise applications can operate at scale without compromise. Similarly, VPN Gateway solutions provide encrypted internet-based connections but are limited by bandwidth constraints, variable latency, and the operational overhead of maintaining multiple tunnels for multi-VNet or multi-region connectivity. ExpressRoute eliminates these constraints, providing a seamless, reliable, and scalable solution for connecting cloud and on-premises environments.

Overall, ExpressRoute delivers a combination of predictability, performance, scalability, and security that is essential for enterprise-grade hybrid cloud architectures. It supports mission-critical workloads by ensuring fast, reliable, and private communication between on-premises infrastructure and Azure VNets, enables multi-region deployments, integrates with monitoring and capacity planning tools, and allowing organizations to build resilient and high-performing hybrid applications. By leveraging ExpressRoute, enterprises can maintain operational efficiency, meet performance and compliance requirements, and implement scalable hybrid cloud strategies that align with best practices for global, mission-critical workloads.

Question 215:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and support disaster recovery. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the closest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic in case of failure, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities within a region. It cannot perform global DNS-based routing, geographic traffic distribution, or health-based failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 regionally. It cannot manage global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are directed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It supports high availability, disaster recovery, and operational monitoring for globally distributed applications. Enterprises gain scalable, resilient, and high-performing global application delivery, maintaining operational continuity and optimal user experience while following best practices for globally distributed architecture.

Question 216:

You need to establish low-latency, high-throughput connectivity between multiple VNets across Azure regions for a multi-tier application while keeping all traffic private. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables direct, private connectivity between VNets in different Azure regions using Microsoft’s backbone network. This ensures traffic remains isolated from the public internet, reducing security exposure and enhancing performance. It provides low-latency, high-throughput communication crucial for multi-tier applications, where web, application, and database layers reside in separate VNets.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides secure, encrypted communication over the internet. However, performance can fluctuate due to variable internet latency and bandwidth constraints. Multiple VPN tunnels across regions require extensive management, increasing operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed for private connectivity between on-premises and Azure networks. Using it for inter-VNet communication across regions introduces unnecessary cost and complexity, as Global VNet Peering provides the same functionality for VNets directly.

Option D, NSGs, control traffic at the subnet or NIC level, but do not establish connectivity. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering by enforcing traffic rules, but cannot replace connectivity itself.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, high-performance inter-VNet connectivity across regions, supporting multi-region, hub-and-spoke, and disaster recovery architectures. When combined with NSGs, enterprises achieve granular traffic control, operational simplicity, and secure, scalable network infrastructure aligned with best practices.

Question 217:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence across multiple VNets while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall provides centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement across VNets. Administrators can define application and network rules, integrate threat intelligence to block malicious traffic, and monitor logs for compliance and auditing. Azure Firewall scales automatically, maintaining high availability and uninterrupted policy enforcement.

Option B, NSGs, control traffic at the subnet or NIC level, but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. They complement Azure Firewall but lack automated scaling and enterprise-level inspection.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, provides layer 4 traffic distribution but does not inspect traffic or enforce policies. It cannot integrate threat intelligence or centralize enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities for HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot enforce enterprise-wide outbound policies or inspect all traffic across VNets.

Deploying Azure Firewall enables enterprises to maintain consistent security policies, proactively block threats, achieve regulatory compliance, and reduce operational overhead. It supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures, providing high availability and automated scaling, making it a best-practice choice for enterprise-grade cloud network security.

Question 218:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across multiple VNets while integrating network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement. Manual route configuration should be minimized. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This reduces manual configuration, minimizes errors, and ensures consistent routing across enterprise networks. NVAs integrated with Route Server provide centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance. Route Server supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures, simplifying operations and improving scalability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP but does not integrate NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet routing requires manual configuration, monitoring, and maintenance, increasing operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but does not automate route propagation or integrate NVAs. Manual route management is required, adding operational overhead.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or provide centralized inspection. They complement the Route Server but cannot replace the routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable routing with integrated NVAs. Enterprises benefit from high availability, operational efficiency, and scalable network management. It reduces errors, supports hybrid and multi-region deployments, and aligns with best practices for secure, scalable cloud network design.

Question 219:

You need private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets to support workloads requiring predictable performance and reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This guarantees predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput for enterprise workloads, such as databases, analytics, and financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region deployments, enabling reliable and scalable hybrid cloud architectures.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity. Performance is less predictable, subject to latency, bandwidth limitations, and public network variability. VPN Gateway also increases operational complexity for multi-VNet or multi-region scenarios.

Option C, Azure Bastion, allows secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs, but does not provide high-throughput connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. They are complementary to ExpressRoute but cannot replace it.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, and high-performance connectivity for critical workloads. It bypasses the public internet, enhances operational reliability, supports hybrid and multi-VNet deployments, disaster recovery, and aligns with enterprise best practices for hybrid cloud networking.

Question 220:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic if failures occur, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF for HTTP/HTTPS traffic within a region. It cannot perform global routing, health-based failover, or geographic traffic distribution.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 within a region. It does not provide global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not offer global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery features.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are directed to the closest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving application responsiveness. It enhances high availability, supports disaster recovery, and provides operational monitoring for globally distributed applications. Enterprises gain scalable, resilient, and high-performing global application delivery while maintaining continuity and optimal user experience, adhering to best practices for global architectures.

Question 221:

You need to establish secure, low-latency connectivity between multiple VNets across regions while ensuring all traffic remains within Microsoft’s backbone network. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables direct, private connectivity between VNets in different Azure regions using Microsoft’s backbone network. This ensures that all traffic remains isolated from the public internet, improving security and performance. It allows low-latency, high-throughput communication, which is critical for distributed applications with separate VNets for web, application, and database layers. Global VNet Peering eliminates the need for VPN tunnels or manual route configurations, simplifying network management and reducing operational risk.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides secure, encrypted connectivity over the public internet. While safe, VPN Gateway is subject to variable latency and bandwidth, which can negatively impact performance-sensitive workloads. Managing multiple tunnels across regions adds complexity and overhead.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is primarily designed for private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. Using it for inter-VNet connectivity across regions is unnecessarily expensive and operationally complex, as Global VNet Peering already provides private backbone connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but do not provide connectivity. NSGs are essential for security control, but cannot replace the connectivity functionality of Global VNet Peering.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures reliable, secure, high-performance inter-VNet communication across regions. It supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures and reduces operational complexity while maintaining high throughput and low latency. When combined with NSGs for granular access control, enterprises achieve both security and performance aligned with best practices for multi-region Azure deployments.

Question 222:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence integration across multiple VNets. The solution must scale automatically and provide high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall service designed to centralize traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets. Administrators can define network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence to proactively block malicious activity, and maintain logs for auditing and compliance. Its automatic scaling ensures that traffic spikes are handled without manual intervention, while high availability ensures uninterrupted policy enforcement.

Option B, NSGs, provides traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level but cannot centralize policy enforcement or integrate threat intelligence. They complement Azure Firewall but lack automated scaling and enterprise-wide inspection.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes layer 4 traffic but does not inspect traffic content or enforce security policies. It cannot integrate threat intelligence or provide centralized policy enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities for HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It is limited to web traffic and cannot enforce enterprise-wide outbound security policies or inspect all outbound traffic across VNets.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows enterprises to maintain consistent security policies, proactively block threats, and comply with regulatory requirements. It supports hub-and-spoke and multi-region architectures, ensuring high availability and automated scaling. Organizations benefit from enterprise-grade security, simplified operations, and scalable protection for critical workloads across Azure.

Question 223:

You need to propagate routes dynamically across multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances (NVAs) for centralized traffic inspection while minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual route configuration, reduces human error, and ensures consistent routing across enterprise networks. NVAs integrated with Route Server provide centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across VNets. Route Server is ideal for hub-and-spoke or multi-region architectures, allowing scalable and operationally efficient routing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP and dynamic routing but does not integrate NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet routing requires manual configuration, monitoring, and maintenance, increasing operational complexity and the risk of misconfiguration.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable routing with integrated NVAs. Enterprises gain operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. It reduces configuration errors, supports hybrid and multi-region deployments, and aligns with best practices for secure and maintainable cloud network architectures.

Question 224:

You need private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets for workloads requiring predictable performance and reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is critical for enterprise workloads such as databases, analytics, and financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, enabling scalable and reliable hybrid cloud architectures.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the internet. While secure, performance is variable due to public network dependency, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive or high-throughput workloads. VPN Gateway also increases management complexity for multi-VNet or multi-region deployments.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs, but does not offer high-throughput connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. They are complementary to ExpressRoute but cannot replace high-performance private connectivity.

Question 225:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the closest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic if an endpoint fails, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF functionality within a region. It cannot perform global routing, health-based failover across regions, or geographic traffic distribution.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 within a region and cannot provide global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery functionality.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are directed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It supports high availability, disaster recovery, and operational monitoring for globally distributed applications. Enterprises benefit from scalable, resilient, and high-performing global application delivery, maintaining operational continuity and optimal user experience while adhering to best practices for globally distributed architecture.

Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 15 Q211-225

Related posts: