Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 13 Q181-195

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 181:

You need to provide secure, low-latency connectivity between multiple VNets across regions, ensuring private communication without traversing the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows private connectivity between Azure VNets across different regions using Microsoft’s backbone network. This approach provides high-throughput, low-latency communication that is critical for multi-tier, distributed applications where each tier is deployed in separate VNets across regions. The traffic never leaves Microsoft’s network, enhancing security and reducing exposure to the public internet.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the public internet. While it ensures security through encryption, it is subject to latency fluctuations, bandwidth constraints, and variable performance. VPN Gateway requires careful configuration, monitoring, and scaling, which increases operational complexity for multi-region deployments.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Using ExpressRoute solely for VNet-to-VNet connectivity is operationally inefficient and cost-prohibitive. It is designed for hybrid connectivity rather than intra-cloud communication.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC levels. NSGs enhance security but do not provide connectivity. They are complementary to Global VNet Peering but cannot replace the need for network links.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, low-latency, high-throughput communication across regions. It simplifies network management, supports disaster recovery and multi-region deployments, and aligns with enterprise best practices for operational efficiency, scalability, and predictable network performance. Combining Global VNet Peering with NSGs enables granular access control without sacrificing connectivity or performance. Global VNet Peering in Microsoft Azure establishes high-performance, private connectivity between VNets located in different regions, using Microsoft’s dedicated backbone network rather than the public internet. This architecture allows traffic to travel through a highly optimized, redundant, and latency-engineered global infrastructure designed to support mission-critical enterprise workloads. When organizations deploy multi-region applications—such as distributed microservices, cross-regional database replication, global failover systems, or multi-tier architectures—predictable latency and consistent throughput become essential. Global VNet Peering addresses these demands by offering a network experience that is effectively equivalent to intra-region communication, providing near-line-rate transfer speeds and stable performance regardless of geographic distance. This reliability is especially beneficial for large enterprises that require deterministic behavior for applications involving real-time financial transactions, monitoring systems, or latency-sensitive data analytics.

The backbone-based routing used by Global VNet Peering eliminates the performance variability commonly associated with internet-based connectivity. Because traffic never leaves Microsoft’s trusted network, the risk of congestion, throttling, or unexpected routing changes caused by public internet conditions is eliminated. This leads to a secure communication channel by design, reducing the attack surface without relying on encryption tunnels or external devices. The operational simplicity achieved through this model significantly reduces administrative overhead. Networking teams do not need to maintain additional gateways, adjust BGP configurations, or monitor fluctuating throughput limits, making the environment easier to manage at scale. As organizations expand across regions to meet compliance, redundancy, data residency, or customer proximity requirements, the seamless extension of VNets through Global VNet Peering supports rapid scaling without redesigning network topologies.

In contrast, VPN Gateway operates over the public internet, which inherently introduces variability in latency, jitter, packet loss, and throughput. While VPN Gateway ensures secure communication through encryption and tunneling, it cannot guarantee stable performance due to the unpredictable nature of internet routes, congestion, and ISP-dependent characteristics. Additionally, VPN Gateway throughput is limited by SKU selection, gateway processing capabilities, and potential bottlenecks during peak traffic. For multi-region connectivity, organizations must deploy multiple gateways, manage tunnel configurations, monitor availability, and address failover complexity. This makes VPN Gateway more suitable for cost-optimized or lower-priority cross-region communication rather than performance-critical enterprise deployments. The operational demands of maintaining a highly reliable VPN-based architecture across several Azure regions can also become expensive in terms of time, tools, and expertise.

ExpressRoute, while powerful for private, high-bandwidth connectivity between on-premises environments and Azure, is not designed for VNet-to-VNet communication within the cloud. Using ExpressRoute solely to interconnect Azure VNets across regions would require unnecessary infrastructure, additional circuits, premium add-ons, and coordination with service providers. This approach results in excessive cost and operational inefficiency because ExpressRoute is optimized for hybrid connectivity, enabling enterprises to extend their datacenter network into Azure with predictable performance. Leveraging it for intra-Azure connectivity provides no advantage over Global VNet Peering, which already utilizes Microsoft’s private backbone without the need for physical circuits or carrier involvement. ExpressRoute remains most valuable when enterprises integrate on-premises systems, high-volume workloads, or sensitive data pipelines with cloud services, not when linking VNets that already reside within Azure.

Network Security Groups (NSGs), while critical for security enforcement, do not facilitate any form of network connectivity. They operate at the subnet or network interface level to allow or deny traffic based on rules, but cannot establish routes, tunnels, or peering relationships. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering by applying granular security controls to peered traffic, ensuring only authorized workloads can communicate even after peering is established. This layered security approach supports zero-trust models and strengthens organizational compliance frameworks. However, NSGs alone do not meet requirements for cross-region application communication, redundancy planning, or distributed deployments because they simply filter traffic; they do not carry it.

Choosing Global VNet Peering becomes a strategic decision for organizations aiming to build modern, resilient, globally distributed cloud architectures. It supports large-scale data replication, application segmentation across regions, and disaster-recovery strategies that rely on rapid failover and synchronized states. By removing the need for gateways and minimizing manual configuration, Global VNet Peering reduces the potential for misconfiguration-related outages, simplifies troubleshooting, and enhances operational agility. Enterprises can deploy new regions or scale existing architectures quickly without rethinking connectivity models or adjusting complex routing configurations.

Moreover, Global VNet Peering maintains compatibility with Azure-native monitoring, logging, and security tools, enabling centralized oversight across multi-region deployments. This helps organizations maintain consistent governance and compliance while benefiting from global cloud distribution. The predictable performance, reduced latency, and straightforward management directly support objectives such as customer-facing global applications, real-time processing systems, multi-region microservices, and geographically resilient infrastructures.

By incorporating NSGs into the design, organizations reinforce a strong security posture without compromising performance. NSGs ensure that only required communication flows between peered VNets, enabling least-privilege access while the backbone network maintains high performance. Together, Global VNet Peering and NSGs create a robust, efficient, secure, and scalable networking foundation that aligns with enterprise best practices for cloud connectivity, operational excellence, and long-term architectural reliability.

Question 182:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and threat intelligence across multiple VNets, while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall solution that centralizes traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets. Administrators can define application and network rules, integrate threat intelligence to block malicious traffic, and generate detailed logs for auditing. Azure Firewall automatically scales to handle traffic surges and provides high availability to maintain continuous policy enforcement during regional outages or traffic spikes.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC levels. While useful for segmentation, NSGs cannot provide centralized inspection, application-level rules, automatic scaling, or threat intelligence integration. NSGs are a complementary security layer but are insufficient for enterprise-wide outbound policy enforcement.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, ensures availability through layer 4 traffic distribution but does not inspect traffic, enforce policies, or integrate threat intelligence. It is unsuitable for centralized security enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities but inspects only HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It does not provide enterprise-wide centralized inspection for all outbound traffic or threat intelligence integration.

Deploying Azure Firewall provides enterprises with centralized, scalable, and highly available security policy enforcement. Its integration with threat intelligence proactively blocks malicious traffic while logging supports auditing and monitoring. Azure Firewall simplifies operational management in complex, multi-VNet environments. It aligns with best practices for secure, resilient, and compliant cloud networking. High availability and automatic scaling ensure continuous enforcement and minimal operational intervention. Azure Firewall delivers a centralized, stateful, and fully managed network security solution designed to protect workloads across distributed environments in Microsoft Azure. It enables enterprises to implement uniform, organization-wide security controls without deploying or managing individual appliances. By applying both application and network-level filtering, Azure Firewall enforces consistent outbound, inbound, and east-west traffic policies across multiple VNets and regions. The service integrates advanced threat-intelligence capabilities that can automatically alert or block traffic originating from known malicious IPs and domains, providing a proactive defense layer. Because Azure Firewall is cloud-native, it continuously receives platform updates that enhance security posture without requiring manual patches or maintenance. This built-in adaptability allows security teams to focus on governance and compliance rather than infrastructure upkeep, strengthening the overall network defense strategy.

A key advantage of Azure Firewall is its ability to scale automatically based on network traffic patterns. As organizations grow or experience sudden increases in traffic due to seasonal workloads, application deployments, or unexpected spikes, Azure Firewall adjusts seamlessly without degrading performance or requiring pre-provisioned capacity. This elasticity ensures uninterrupted enforcement of security rules, eliminating the risk of bottlenecks that can occur with static, appliance-based firewalls. High availability is also inherent to the service, supported by redundant infrastructure deployed across zones where available. This architectural resilience ensures that even during regional incidents, maintenance operations, or infrastructure-level failures, security enforcement remains active and reliable. These capabilities are essential for enterprises implementing zero-trust principles, where continuous verification and strict access control must remain intact regardless of system load or underlying infrastructure events.

Option B, NSGs, provide rule-based filtering for subnets and NICs but do not deliver the centralized oversight or intelligence-driven inspection required by enterprise-scale security strategies. NSGs operate at a granular level, making them effective for micro-segmentation but insufficient for detecting advanced threats or governing traffic at a global or multi-VNet scope. Because NSGs lack stateful inspection, full protocol support, and application-level visibility, they cannot enforce the sophisticated outbound restrictions and deep packet evaluation that Azure Firewall provides. NSGs also rely on administrators to maintain them individually across subnets, which increases operational complexity in large environments.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, is designed strictly for distributing layer 4 traffic and improving application resiliency. It cannot analyze packets for security threats, enforce compliance-driven outbound rules, or centralize inspection. While it supports availability and performance objectives, it contributes no direct security intelligence, making it unsuitable as a replacement for a firewall. Standard Load Balancer is often combined with security tools rather than serving as one.

Option D, Application Gateway, includes a Web Application Firewall but focuses on layer 7 HTTP/HTTPS traffic, making it effective for web workloads but limited for broader network security requirements. It does not inspect non-HTTP protocols, does not act as a full network firewall, and cannot govern traffic across multiple VNets or provide unified outbound filtering. While an Application Gateway enhances web-layer security, it is not built to handle enterprise-wide traffic inspection.

Deploying Azure Firewall ensures that organizations have a consistent and robust security posture across all connected environments, enabling simplified rule management, centralized monitoring, and uniform enforcement of compliance standards. Its native integration with logging and monitoring services allows teams to gain deep visibility into traffic flows, detect anomalies, and conduct audits with confidence. Azure Firewall supports complex multi-VNet topologies, allowing enterprises to implement secure hub-and-spoke or mesh architectures without the operational burden of managing distributed firewalls. Its scalability, availability, and intelligence-driven protections make it a foundational component for secure, modern, cloud-first networking.

Question 183:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across multiple VNets while integrating network virtual appliances for centralized inspection and policy enforcement, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers using BGP. It eliminates manual route configuration, reduces operational errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex enterprise networks. Integration with NVAs allows centralized inspection and policy enforcement, ensuring compliance and security across multiple VNets.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing with BGP but does not directly integrate with NVAs for centralized traffic inspection. Multi-VNet routing with VPN Gateway requires manual setup and monitoring, increasing operational complexity and error potential.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure but does not automate route propagation or integrate with NVAs. Manual route management is required for inter-VNet communication.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot manage dynamic routing or centralize inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but cannot replace its routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable route propagation while integrating NVAs for centralized inspection. It provides operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable management. Enterprises can monitor route propagation, detect anomalies, and maintain compliance. Route Server supports hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, enabling consistent and secure routing. This aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, reliable, and secure network design, reducing manual errors and operational overhead. Azure Route Server provides an automated and resilient routing control plane that simplifies connectivity management across distributed environments in Microsoft Azure. By leveraging BGP, it enables real-time, dynamic route exchange among VNets, network virtual appliances, and on-premises routers without requiring administrators to manually configure, validate, or update route tables. In large enterprise architectures that span multiple regions, environments, or security zones, routing complexity increases significantly. Without automation, each route update, new VNet, or topology change introduces the risk of misconfiguration, outages, or suboptimal traffic flow. Azure Route Server resolves these challenges by continuously synchronizing routes, detecting changes instantly, and updating all connected components to maintain consistent forwarding behavior. This reduces the operational burden on network teams and ensures that workloads can communicate reliably regardless of architectural scale or evolving infrastructure.

A powerful capability of Azure Route Server is its seamless integration with network virtual appliances. NVAs are commonly used for traffic inspection, policy enforcement, and advanced security operations in hub-and-spoke or mesh designs. By automatically exchanging routes with NVAs, the Route Server ensures that all VNets can direct traffic through inspection points without manually defining UDRs or adjusting routes when topologies change. This integration enables flexible, scalable security models where administrators can introduce new inspection appliances or modify existing ones without reconfiguring each participating VNet. Route Server maintains continuous alignment between application environments, gateways, and inspection services, ensuring uninterrupted security coverage across distributed architectures.

Option B, the Azure VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing with BGP but requires extensive manual coordination for multi-VNet connectivity. VPN Gateway is primarily designed to establish encrypted tunnels between Azure and external networks or between regions, and while functional, it introduces gateway provisioning, tunnel configuration, monitoring requirements, and SKU-based throughput limitations. It does not provide automated route propagation across NVAs, nor does it simplify complex hub-and-spoke routing scenarios. As enterprise environments grow, relying solely on VPN Gateways for dynamic routing results in significantly higher administrative overhead and less flexibility.

Option C, Azure ExpressRoute, offers private connectivity between on-premises environments and Azure, but does not automate intra-Azure routing. ExpressRoute circuits require coordination with service providers, and although they support BGP, organizations must manually manage routing relationships for inter-VNet communication. This limits scalability and agility in cloud-native architectures, especially where many VNets must exchange routes or integrate with NVAs. ExpressRoute excels in hybrid connectivity, not automated cloud routing.

Option D, NSGs, provide local traffic filtering and segmentation but are not routing tools. They cannot propagate, exchange, or influence routes and do not integrate with NVAs for path selection or policy enforcement. NSGs remain valuable for access control but do not replace dynamic routing functions or centralized inspection workflows.

Deploying Azure Route Server establishes a modern, cloud-native routing foundation that supports flexible and scalable architectures. Its ability to maintain synchronized BGP routing across VNets, NVAs, and hybrid connections ensures stable traffic flow even as environments evolve. Enterprises benefit from reduced operational complexity, fewer configuration errors, faster deployment cycles, and consistent compliance enforcement. The automated routing fabric enabled by Route Server supports advanced designs such as secure hubs, distributed inspection clusters, hybrid meshes, and multi-region deployments while ensuring that routing remains predictable, secure, and resilient. This reduces overhead for network teams and aligns with best practices for efficient, scalable, and highly available cloud networking.

Question 184:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets to support enterprise workloads requiring predictable performance and operational reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This guarantees predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, making it suitable for enterprise workloads such as mission-critical databases, real-time analytics, and large-scale financial applications. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity, which is subject to latency fluctuations and bandwidth limitations, making it unsuitable for high-performance workloads.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without public IP exposure. It does not provide high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and VNets.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. NSGs complement connectivity solutions but cannot replace high-performance transport mechanisms.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity for mission-critical workloads. It bypasses the public internet, reducing latency, enhancing reliability, and supporting operational efficiency. ExpressRoute integrates with monitoring and analytics tools for performance tracking and proactive capacity planning. It supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and hybrid workloads. Enterprises gain predictable performance, enhanced security, and operational reliability while adhering to hybrid cloud networking best practices.ExpressRoute delivers dedicated, private, carrier-backed connectivity between on-premises datacenters and virtual networks in Microsoft Azure, ensuring that enterprise workloads benefit from a communication path that never traverses the public internet. This design provides deterministic network performance, consistent latency, and stable throughput—factors that are essential for organizations operating workloads with strict performance, compliance, or reliability requirements. In environments where large data transfers, real-time replication, continuous synchronization, or low-jitter communication are required, ExpressRoute enables a level of predictability that public-internet VPN solutions cannot match. Because the connection is established through connectivity providers, users gain SLA-backed reliability with forecasts of performance metrics, making capacity planning and architectural scaling far easier for enterprise teams.

Organizations running mission-critical databases, financial trading systems, supply-chain management solutions, health-sector applications, and analytics platforms often require high-bandwidth, low-latency communication between their on-premises infrastructure and Azure. ExpressRoute directly satisfies such needs by supporting bandwidth options that can scale far beyond typical VPN limits. The ability to utilize ExpressRoute Global Reach further enhances connectivity by enabling private connections between different on-premises locations through the Azure backbone, consolidating network paths, and simplifying enterprise routing strategies. This allows organizations to build a globally distributed hybrid network architecture that retains private paths end-to-end, reducing complexity and enhancing security posture.

A major strength of ExpressRoute lies in its operational consistency. Traffic behavior is predictable, capacity is provisioned through service providers, and performance is not influenced by public Internet congestion. For enterprises with compliance or audit requirements such as financial regulations, healthcare mandates, or data-protection standards, the separation from the public internet helps minimize exposure to risks, lowers the attack surface, and aligns with stringent governance models. Additionally, ExpressRoute circuits seamlessly integrate with Azure services, enabling hybrid architectures to expand in a modular fashion without re-evaluating connectivity strategies every time new VNets, regions, or workloads are added. Routing can be centrally managed through BGP, making failover, redundancy, and segmentation straightforward for network administrators.

Option B, the Azure VPN Gateway, while offering secure connectivity via IPsec or IKE tunnels, operates over the public internet. This creates inherent variability in network quality due to ISP congestion, route changes, and unpredictable latency. Such fluctuations can disrupt workloads that rely on real-time responsiveness or require uninterrupted high-volume data transfer. Even though VPN Gateway is cost-effective and suitable for smaller or less latency-sensitive hybrid environments, it does not deliver the throughput, reliability, or deterministic performance that enterprise-grade architectures require.

Option C, Azure Bastion, is designed for secure remote management of virtual machines without exposing them to public IPs. While it plays a valuable role in improving administrative security, it does not facilitate data transport, hybrid connectivity, or workload integration between on-premises networks and Azure. Azure Bastion cannot provide any guarantees around throughput, latency, or private routing paths and, therefore, is not relevant for high-performance hybrid network design.

Option D, NSGs, serve as distributed access-control mechanisms that allow or deny traffic at the subnet or NIC level. While essential for segmentation and policy enforcement, NSGs do not influence connectivity performance, provide transport paths, or improve latency. They enhance the security posture of a hybrid network but cannot function as a connectivity solution or replace dedicated hybrid networking technologies.

Choosing ExpressRoute allows enterprises to align their hybrid strategies with operational excellence and long-term scalability. Its integration with Azure Monitor and network analytics tools enables visibility into circuit utilization, latency patterns, and route behaviors, helping administrators proactively adjust bandwidth or adapt architectures. ExpressRoute also supports disaster recovery strategies by ensuring that replication between on-premises systems and cloud-based infrastructure remains stable, predictable, and resilient. When paired with multi-region workloads, global architectures, or enterprise resource planning systems, ExpressRoute ensures that hybrid communication remains consistent even under heavy operational loads.

By enabling private, high-performance communication paths and eliminating internet-based uncertainties, ExpressRoute empowers enterprises to run sensitive, critical, and large-scale workloads confidently across hybrid environments. The result is a connectivity foundation that supports predictable application behavior, strengthens security, and enhances reliability, allowing organizations to meet demanding business, regulatory, and operational requirements with clarity and consistency.

Question 185:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and support disaster recovery. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing solution that directs users to the closest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports routing methods including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic in the event of failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides regional layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities. It cannot perform global DNS-based routing, latency-based failover, or health-based endpoint routing across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It does not provide global routing, latency optimization, or health-based failover.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery support.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global availability and disaster recovery capabilities while providing traffic monitoring for operational management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for globally distributed applications, ensuring resilience, high availability, and optimized performance across regions. Its intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover capabilities support scalable, reliable global applications.

Question 186:

You need to implement secure, private connectivity between VNets across different Azure regions while ensuring high throughput, low latency, and no exposure to the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables seamless, private connectivity between VNets across Azure regions using Microsoft’s backbone network. This ensures low-latency, high-throughput communication for distributed applications where different VNets host web, application, and database tiers. By keeping traffic within Microsoft’s network, enterprises eliminate exposure to the public internet, reducing security risks and improving performance predictability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides secure, encrypted connectivity over the public internet but suffers from latency variability, bandwidth limitations, and dependency on external network reliability. Configuring VPN Gateway for multi-region VNet communication increases operational complexity, including tunnel management, BGP configuration, and monitoring, making it less ideal for enterprise-scale deployments.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed for private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, not primarily for VNet-to-VNet communication. Using ExpressRoute for VNet-to-VNet connectivity introduces unnecessary operational overhead and costs.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC levels but do not provide network connectivity. They complement Global VNet Peering for granular access control, but cannot replace connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, low-latency communication across regions, supporting hub-and-spoke, mesh, and multi-region architectures. It facilitates disaster recovery, high availability, and operational efficiency. Combined with NSGs for access control, it aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and predictable Azure networking.

Question 187:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection, threat intelligence, and policy enforcement across multiple VNets while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall provides a fully managed, stateful firewall solution for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement. It allows administrators to create application and network rules, integrate threat intelligence for proactive threat mitigation, and log all activity for auditing. Azure Firewall scales automatically to handle traffic spikes and provides high availability, ensuring continuous enforcement during regional failures or increased loads.

Option B, NSGs, are critical for segmentation and access control but lack centralized management, automatic scaling, threat intelligence, and application-level inspection capabilities. They complement Azure Firewall but cannot enforce enterprise-wide policies independently.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, provides layer 4 traffic distribution but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. It is unsuitable for centralized outbound traffic inspection.

Option D, Application Gateway, inspects only HTTP/HTTPS traffic at layer 7 and lacks enterprise-wide centralized inspection for all outbound traffic or threat intelligence integration.

Deploying Azure Firewall enables enterprises to implement consistent security policies across multiple VNets, reduce operational errors, and achieve compliance. Integration with threat intelligence proactively blocks malicious activity. Logging provides audit and monitoring capabilities. Azure Firewall integrates with hub-and-spoke architectures to centralize inspection without multiple appliances. Automatic scaling and high availability ensure uninterrupted enforcement, aligning with best practices for secure, operationally efficient, and scalable cloud networks.

Question 188:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across VNets while integrating network virtual appliances for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual route management, reduces operational errors, and ensures consistent routing across enterprise-scale networks. Integrating NVAs allows centralized inspection and policy enforcement, supporting security and compliance requirements across VNets.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP for dynamic routing but does not integrate directly with NVAs. Multi-VNet routing using VPN Gateway requires manual configuration and monitoring, which increases operational complexity and error potential.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is for private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but does not automate route propagation or integrate with NVAs. Manual route configuration is required, adding operational overhead.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot propagate routes or centralize traffic inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server by controlling access, but cannot replace its routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server provides automated, reliable route propagation while integrating NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises achieve operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. Route Server supports hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, providing consistent, secure routing. It enables monitoring of route propagation, detection of anomalies, and maintenance of compliance. This aligns with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable, and efficient network operations.

Question 189:

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute offers dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, critical for enterprise workloads such as mission-critical databases, real-time analytics, and financial systems. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity but is subject to latency fluctuations and bandwidth limitations, making it less suitable for high-performance enterprise workloads.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without exposing public IPs. It does not provide high-throughput or low-latency connectivity for enterprise workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. NSGs complement ExpressRoute but cannot replace high-performance private connectivity.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Bypassing the public internet enhances reliability, security, and operational efficiency. ExpressRoute integrates with monitoring tools for performance tracking and capacity planning. It supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and hybrid workloads. Enterprises benefit from predictable performance, enhanced security, and operational reliability while following hybrid cloud networking best practices.

Question 190:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority-based, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic in case of failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery readiness. This is essential for globally distributed applications where latency minimization and high uptime are critical.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides regional layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities. It cannot perform global DNS-based routing or health-based routing across regions, making it unsuitable for global latency optimization.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot provide global routing, latency-based failover, or disaster recovery functionality.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing, performance optimization, or disaster recovery support.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the nearest healthy endpoint, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global availability, disaster recovery, and operational monitoring. Traffic Manager supports enterprise best practices for globally distributed applications, providing intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover. It ensures resilient, high-performing, and scalable global application deployments while maintaining operational continuity and user experience.

Question 191:

You need to establish secure, low-latency connectivity between VNets in different Azure regions for a multi-tier application, ensuring traffic does not traverse the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering enables private connectivity between VNets in different regions via Microsoft’s backbone network. This allows low-latency, high-throughput communication between application tiers, ensuring traffic remains within Azure’s secure infrastructure rather than traversing the public internet. It simplifies operations by eliminating the need for VPN tunnels or manual route configurations.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the public internet. While secure, VPN Gateway is susceptible to latency, bandwidth fluctuations, and requires additional management, making it less ideal for multi-region, high-performance connectivity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed for private on-premises-to-Azure connectivity. Using ExpressRoute solely for VNet-to-VNet communication increases cost and operational complexity.

Option D, NSGs, provides traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level but does not establish connectivity. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering for granular access control but cannot replace network links.

Global VNet Peering ensures secure, reliable, and high-performance communication across regions, supporting hub-and-spoke and multi-tier architectures, disaster recovery, and operational efficiency. Combining it with NSGs ensures granular access control while maintaining connectivity.

Question 192:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets, including integration with threat intelligence and automatic scaling. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall solution that centralizes policy enforcement and traffic inspection across VNets. It allows network and application rules, threat intelligence integration, logging for auditing, and automatic scaling to meet traffic demands while maintaining high availability.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot centralize policy enforcement, integrate threat intelligence, or provide application-level inspection.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes layer 4 traffic but does not provide traffic inspection or policy enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, inspects layer 7 HTTP/HTTPS traffic only and cannot enforce centralized security across all outbound traffic or integrate with threat intelligence.

Azure Firewall enables consistent, centralized security policy enforcement across VNets, reduces operational complexity, supports compliance, and ensures high availability. It integrates with hub-and-spoke architectures, providing scalable, secure traffic inspection. Automatic scaling ensures continuous policy enforcement during traffic spikes or failures, aligning with enterprise best practices.

Question 193:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across VNets while integrating network virtual appliances for centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This reduces manual configuration, minimizes errors, and ensures consistent routing across enterprise networks. NVAs allow centralized inspection and policy enforcement, supporting security and compliance across VNets.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing with BGP but does not directly integrate NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet routing with VPN Gateway requires manual configuration and monitoring.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises and Azure but does not automate route propagation or integrate with NVAs. Manual routing increases operational overhead.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but cannot handle dynamic routing or centralize traffic inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but cannot replace it.

Azure Route Server ensures reliable, automated route propagation, centralized inspection via NVAs, operational efficiency, high availability, and scalable network management. It supports hybrid, multi-region, and hub-and-spoke architectures. Enterprises benefit from consistent, secure, and scalable routing with reduced configuration errors, aligning with best practices for enterprise network operations.

Question 194:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets for enterprise workloads requiring predictable performance. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This guarantees predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is essential for enterprise workloads such as critical databases, analytics pipelines, and financial systems. ExpressRoute supports multiple VNets and regions, enabling hybrid cloud deployments with enterprise-grade reliability.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity but is subject to latency, bandwidth fluctuations, and dependency on public internet stability, making it unsuitable for high-performance enterprise workloads.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs but does not deliver high-throughput or low-latency connectivity for workloads.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. They complement ExpressRoute but cannot replace it.

ExpressRoute ensures predictable, secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Bypassing the public internet enhances reliability and security. It integrates with monitoring tools for performance tracking and capacity planning and supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and hybrid workloads. Enterprises benefit from predictable performance, operational efficiency, and security, aligning with best practices for hybrid cloud networking.

Question 195:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based global traffic routing service that directs users to the closest or healthiest endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and reroutes traffic during failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery readiness.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities at the regional level but cannot perform global DNS-based routing or health-based failover across regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 regionally and cannot manage global routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for worldwide users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery support.

Azure Traffic Manager ensures global users are routed to the nearest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It provides global high availability, disaster recovery, and operational monitoring. Enterprises gain resilient, scalable, and optimized global application delivery while maintaining continuity and performance, adhering to best practices for globally distributed applications.

Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 13 Q181-195

Related posts: