Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 1 Q1-15
Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 1:
You are designing an Azure network for a global enterprise that has multiple VNets across regions. You need to ensure private communication between VNets without traversing the public internet. Which solution should you implement?
A) ExpressRoute
B) VNet Peering
C) VPN Gateway with site-to-site connection
D) Azure Firewall
Answer:
B
Explanation:
VNet Peering is the recommended solution for private connectivity between Azure virtual networks. It allows virtual networks within the same or different regions to communicate using private IP addresses without routing traffic through the public internet. This results in low latency, high throughput, and secure communication across VNets. Peering can be established between VNets within the same subscription or across subscriptions, providing flexibility in complex enterprise network topologies.
Option A, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but is not intended for direct VNet-to-VNet communication unless routed through the on-premises network. It is primarily for hybrid cloud scenarios, not intra-Azure connectivity. Option C, VPN Gateway with site-to-site connections, could allow inter-VNet connectivity, but is less efficient and scalable compared to VNet Peering. It introduces higher latency and complexity due to encryption overhead and VPN tunnel management. Option D, Azure Firewall, does not provide connectivity, but it is a network security service that filters traffic. While it can inspect and control network flows, it cannot establish private connectivity between VNets. Therefore, VNet Peering is the best solution for secure, high-performance private network communication across VNets.When designing network connectivity within Azure, the choice of solution depends on whether the communication is between on-premises environments and Azure, between different VNets within Azure, or whether security enforcement is the main goal. In the scenario where private connectivity between Azure virtual networks (VNets) is required, VNet Peering emerges as the most effective solution.
Option B: VNet Peering is specifically designed to connect two or more VNets privately, using the Azure backbone network. This means that all communication happens over Microsoft’s internal infrastructure, bypassing the public internet entirely. The benefits of this approach are significant: low latency, high throughput, and enhanced security, as traffic does not leave the Azure network. Peering can be configured between VNets in the same region (intra-region peering) or across regions (global VNet peering), and it can even span across different subscriptions, offering flexibility for complex enterprise network topologies. Another advantage is simplicity—once peering is established, resources in different VNets can communicate with each other as if they are in the same network, without the need for complex routing, NAT, or VPN tunnels.
Option A: ExpressRoute is a service that provides private, dedicated connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure datacenters. While ExpressRoute ensures a high-speed, reliable connection and does not traverse the public internet, it is primarily designed for hybrid cloud scenarios where organisations want to extend their on-premises network into Azure securely. ExpressRoute is not inherently intended for direct VNet-to-VNet connectivity unless traffic is routed through the on-premises environment, which introduces unnecessary complexity and cost. Therefore, while powerful for hybrid deployments, it is not the ideal solution for purely intra-Azure private network communication.
Option C: VPN Gateway with site-to-site connection enables connectivity between VNets or between on-premises networks and Azure via encrypted VPN tunnels. While it is technically possible to connect VNets using VPN Gateway, this approach has notable drawbacks. The VPN tunnels introduce encryption overhead, which increases latency and reduces throughput compared to VNet Peering. Additionally, managing multiple VPN connections at scale can become complex, and network performance is generally lower. VPN Gateway is better suited for secure, remote access or hybrid connectivity scenarios rather than high-performance, intra-Azure communication.
Option D: Azure Firewall is a cloud-native network security service that inspects and controls traffic across networks. Its primary role is to enforce security policies, such as filtering traffic, preventing malicious connections, and managing access controls. While Azure Firewall can regulate flows between VNets and subnets, it does not create a private connectivity channel. It cannot substitute for a network link like VNet Peering, ExpressRoute, or VPN Gateway. In other words, it is a security layer, not a connectivity solution.
In summary, when the requirement is private, low-latency, high-performance connectivity between Azure VNets, VNet Peering is the optimal choice. ExpressRoute and VPN Gateway are more suitable for hybrid or encrypted connectivity scenarios, and Azure Firewall addresses security, not network connectivity. The combination of simplicity, flexibility, and direct internal Azure network routing makes VNet Peering the best solution for this use case.
Question 2:
You need to provide a high-availability solution for Azure Load Balancer that ensures backend VMs are distributed across multiple availability zones. Which configuration should you choose?
A) Standard SKU with zone-redundant backend pool
B) Basic SKU with a single availability zone backend pool
C) Application Gateway with WAF
D) Traffic Manager with endpoint monitoring
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Standard SKU Azure Load Balancer supports zone-redundant backend pools, allowing you to deploy VMs across multiple availability zones. This configuration ensures that if one availability zone experiences an outage, the load balancer can automatically distribute traffic to healthy instances in other zones, providing high availability and resiliency. Standard SKU offers higher scalability, support for larger backend pools, and enhanced metrics compared to Basic SKU.
Option B, Basic SKU, does not support zone redundancy and is limited to a single availability zone, making it unsuitable for highly available workloads. Option C, Application Gateway with WAF, operates at layer 7 and is used for HTTP/HTTPS traffic inspection, SSL offloading, and application firewalling, but it does not inherently provide multi-zone backend distri, bution at the network level. Option D, Traffic Manager, is a DNS-based traffic routing solution that directs users to the closest or best-performing endpoints, but does not provide real-time load balancing at the VM level within a region. Therefore, using a Standard SKU Load Balancer with a zone-redundant backend pool is the optimal choice for high availability across zones. When designing highly available and resilient architectures in Azure, choosing the appropriate load balancing solution is critical. The goal is to ensure that application traffic continues to flow seamlessly even if failures occur within a specific availability zone. Azure provides multiple load balancing and traffic distribution solutions, each with distinct capabilities and target use cases.
Option A: Standard SKU with zone-redundant backend pool is specifically designed to provide high availability across multiple availability zones within a region. The Standard SKU Load Balancer allows you to distribute incoming traffic to virtual machines (VMs) deployed across different availability zones, ensuring that the application remains accessible even if one zone experiences a failure. This zone-redundant configuration enhances resiliency because the load balancer monitors the health of backend instances in real-time and automatically directs traffic only to healthy VMs. Additionally, Standard SKU supports larger backend pools, higher throughput, and advanced metrics, providing better performance monitoring and scaling capabilities compared to the Basic SKU. Its ability to integrate with availability zones makes it the most suitable choice for mission-critical workloads that require regional redundancy and high uptime.
Option B: Basic SKU with a single availability zone backend pool is a simpler load-balancing option designed for smaller-scale or less critical workloads. While it can distribute traffic among VMs, it does not support zone redundancy. This means that if a single availability zone hosting the backend VMs encounters an outage, the entire application could become unavailable. Additionally, Basic SKU lacks advanced metrics and scalability features, limiting its usefulness in enterprise environments. While it may suffice for development, testing, or non-critical applications, it is not suitable for scenarios where high availability and zone resiliency are required.
Option C: Application Gateway with WAF (Web Application Firewall) operates at Layer 7 (the application layer), focusing on HTTP/HTTPS traffic. Its primary capabilities include SSL termination, URL-based routing, session affinity, and protection against web-based attacks through the WAF. While Application Gateway can provide sophisticated routing and security features, it is not designed for network-level load balancing across multiple availability zones. Its backend pool distribution is limited in terms of network redundancy, and it is best suited for scenarios where web traffic inspection, application-level routing, or security enforcement is required. It does not replace a network-level load balancer that ensures VM-level high availability across zones.
Option D: Traffic Manager with endpoint monitoring is a DNS-based traffic routing solution. It directs client requests to the closest or best-performing endpoint based on criteria such as geographic location, performance, or priority. While Traffic Manager improves global user experience and can provide failover across regions, it operates at the DNS level and does not manage real-time load balancing within a region. It cannot detect VM-level failures instantly, as DNS caching can delay redirection. Therefore, it cannot provide the same level of high availability for intra-region workloads as a zone-redundant Standard SKU Load Balancer.
In conclusion, for achieving high availability and resiliency at the network level within a region, Standard SKU Azure Load Balancer with a zone-redundant backend pool is the optimal solution. It provides the ability to distribute traffic across multiple availability zones, automatically handle failures, and scale efficiently. The other options—Basic SKU, Application Gateway with WAF, and Traffic Manager—serve specific purposes such as lightweight load balancing, application-level routing, or global DNS-based traffic routing, but none offer the combination of intra-region redundancy, high performance, and VM-level health monitoring that Standard SKU with zone redundancy provides.
Question 3:
You need to implement monitoring and outbound traffic restriction from VNets to the internet for compliance purposes. Which Azure service should you deploy?
A) Network Security Groups (NSGs)
B) Azure DDoS Protection
C) Azure Firewall
D) VNet Peering
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful network security service that monitors, filters, and logs both inbound and outbound traffic from virtual networks. By implementing Azure Firewall, administrators can create rules that restrict outbound traffic to specific destinations or ports, ensuring compliance with corporate policies and regulatory requirements. Azure Firewall also supports threat intelligence-based filtering, logging, and integration with Azure Monitor, which enables auditing and real-time analysis of network activity.
Option A, NSGs, can filter traffic at the subnet or NIC level, but they have limited outbound logging and cannot perform deep inspection or apply centralised policies at scale. NSGs are suitable for basic allow/deny rules, but lack the comprehensive traffic analysis capabilities required for compliance auditing. Option B, Azure DDoS Protection, protects against volumetric denial-of-service attacks, but does not manage general outbound traffic or provide detailed monitoring and logging for compliance. Option D, VNet Peering, enables private connectivity between VNets, but does not provide security, traffic filtering, or monitoring features. Thus, Azure Firewall is the most appropriate service for both outbound restriction and monitoring to satisfy compliance requirements. When designing secure network architectures in Azure, controlling outbound traffic from virtual networks is a critical requirement for both security and compliance. Among the available options, Azure Firewall stands out as the most comprehensive solution for managing and monitoring outbound traffic. Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful network security service capable of inspecting both inbound and outbound traffic across VNets. It allows administrators to define explicit rules controlling which destinations, ports, and protocols are permitted or denied, ensuring that all outbound traffic aligns with corporate policies and regulatory standards. In addition, Azure Firewall integrates with threat intelligence feeds, which helps identify and block traffic to known malicious IPs or domains, enhancing overall network security. Logging and monitoring are native features through Azure Monitor, enabling detailed auditing and real-time insights into traffic patterns and potential security events.
Option A: Network Security Groups (NSGs) can filter inbound and outbound traffic at the subnet or network interface level. While NSGs are effective for controlling basic traffic flows based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols, they lack advanced features such as stateful inspection, application-level filtering, threat intelligence, and comprehensive logging. NSGs are better suited for simple traffic segmentation rather than enterprise-wide outbound traffic control.
Option B: Azure DDoS Protection is designed to protect Azure resources from volumetric Distributed Denial of Service attacks. While it ensures service availability during attacks, it does not provide granular control over outbound traffic or enforce compliance policies. Its purpose is strictly protection against network-based attacks rather than traffic governance.
Option D: VNet Peering allows private connectivity between VNets, facilitating internal communication. However, it does not provide any filtering, logging, or control over traffic. It simply enables network connectivity and cannot enforce outbound restrictions.
Question 4:
You are tasked with enabling hybrid connectivity that ensures low latency and predictable performance between on-premises workloads and Azure VNets. Which solution should you implement?
A) VPN Gateway with point-to-site connection
B) ExpressRoute
C) VNet Peering
D) Azure Bastion
Answer:
B
Explanation:
ExpressRoute provides a private, dedicated connection between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable network performance, low latency, and higher reliability compared to VPN over the public internet. ExpressRoute supports multiple circuits, scalable bandwidth, and integration with Microsoft services such as Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365. It is the preferred solution for enterprises with critical workloads that require consistent network performance.
Option A, VPN Gateway with point-to-site connections, is designed for individual client connectivity and is suitable for small-scale or remote access scenarios. It relies on the public internet, making performance variable and less predictable. Option C, VNet Peering, is for connectivity between Azure VNets, not between on-premises networks and Azure. Option D, Azure Bastion, provides secure remote management of VMs, but does not handle network-level hybrid connectivity. Therefore, ExpressRoute is the optimal solution for enterprise-grade hybrid connectivity with predictable performance. When connecting on-premises networks to Azure, enterprises often require a solution that ensures reliable, high-performance, and secure network connectivity. ExpressRoute is the optimal solution in this context. It provides a private, dedicated connection between an organisation’s on-premises infrastructure and Azure virtual networks, completely bypassing the public internet. By avoiding the internet, ExpressRoute ensures predictable network performance, low latency, and high reliability, which is crucial for mission-critical workloads, such as enterprise applications, databases, or ERP systems. ExpressRoute also supports multiple circuits, scalable bandwidth options, and seamless integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365, making it ideal for hybrid cloud scenarios where consistent connectivity is required across multiple locations and services.
Option A: VPN Gateway with point-to-site connection is designed primarily for individual clients or small-scale remote access scenarios. It allows users to connect securely to Azure over the public internet using encrypted VPN tunnels. While suitable for occasional remote access or small deployments, it is dependent on internet performance, which can be variable and unpredictable. Consequently, VPN Gateway point-to-site connections are not ideal for enterprise workloads that demand consistent network performance and reliability.
Option C: VNet Peering facilitates private connectivity between Azure virtual networks within or across regions. While VNet Peering is highly effective for intra-Azure communication, it does not extend connectivity to on-premises networks. Therefore, it cannot serve as a hybrid connectivity solution for enterprises that need to integrate local infrastructure with Azure workloads.
Option D: Azure Bastion is a platform-managed service that enables secure, browser-based remote management of virtual machines in Azure without exposing RDP or SSH ports to the public internet. While Bastion enhances VM security, it does not provide network-level connectivity for hybrid environments and cannot be used to route enterprise traffic between on-premises networks and Azure.
Question 5:
You are designing a network topology that allows multiple VNets and on-premises networks to exchange routing information dynamically using BGP. Which Azure service is most appropriate?
A) Azure VPN Gateway with BGP
B) ExpressRoute Direct
C) Azure Route Server
D) Azure Traffic Manager
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Azure Route Server enables dynamic routing between Azure VNets, on-premises networks, and network virtual appliances using BGP. By deploying a Route Server, routes are automatically propagated, simplifying network management and reducing the need for manual route configuration. This service provides seamless integration with existing routing appliances and ensures high availability by managing failover dynamically. Enterprises can centralise route management while maintaining secure and flexible connectivity between multiple network segments.
Option A, VPN Gateway with BGP, allows dynamic routing over VPN tunnels and is suitable for hybrid connectivity, but is not optimised for managing multiple VNets and network virtual appliances within Azure. It also requires more complex manual configuration when scaling. Option B, ExpressRoute Direct, provides high-bandwidth private connections to Azure, but does not inherently manage dynamic route propagation between VNets. Option D, Traffic Manager, is a DNS-based service for endpoint routing, focusing on directing user traffic based on latency, geography, or performance, but it does not manage network-level BGP routes or dynamic internal routing. Therefore, Azure Route Server is the most suitable choice for dynamic, scalable routing between multiple VNets and on-premises networks. In complex Azure network architectures, managing connectivity and routing between multiple VNets, on-premises networks, and network virtual appliances can become challenging. Azure Route Server addresses this challenge by enabling dynamic routing using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). With Route Server, route propagation between Azure VNets and network appliances occurs automatically, eliminating the need for manual route configuration and reducing operational overhead. This dynamic routing capability ensures that as networks scale or change, routes are updated seamlessly, maintaining continuous connectivity and high availability. Additionally, Route Server integrates with existing routing appliances, allowing enterprises to centralise route management while ensuring secure and flexible connectivity across multiple network segments.
Option A: Azure VPN Gateway with BGP allows for dynamic routing over VPN tunnels and is suitable for hybrid connectivity scenarios where on-premises networks need to communicate with Azure. While it supports BGP, VPN Gateway is not designed for efficiently managing dynamic routes across multiple VNets and network virtual appliances within Azure. Scaling such configurations can become complex, requiring manual intervention and extensive route management, making it less suitable for large, dynamic cloud networks.
Option B: ExpressRoute Direct provides high-bandwidth, private connectivity from on-premises networks to Azure. While it delivers reliable, low-latency connections, it does not inherently manage dynamic route propagation within Azure VNets or between multiple network virtual appliances. ExpressRoute Direct primarily addresses connectivity performance rather than route management, so additional configuration is required to handle dynamic routing.
Option D: Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based traffic routing service designed to optimise user traffic based on latency, geography, or endpoint performance. It operates at the application layer rather than the network layer and does not manage BGP routes or internal network routing. Therefore, it cannot provide the dynamic, scalable routing capabilities required for complex multi-VNet and hybrid network environments.
In conclusion, for organisations needing efficient, scalable, and dynamic routing between multiple VNets, on-premises networks, and network appliances, Azure Route Server is the optimal choice. VPN Gateway with BGP, ExpressRoute Direct, and Traffic Manager serve specific use cases, but do not provide the centralised, automatic route propagation and management that Route Server delivers.
Question 6:
You are tasked with designing a high-availability architecture for Azure VPN Gateway to minimise downtime during planned maintenance or unplanned failures. Which configuration should you implement?
A) Active-active configuration
B) VNet Peering
C) ExpressRoute circuit
D) Azure Load Balancer
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The Active-active configuration for Azure VPN Gateway is designed to provide high availability and fault tolerance by deploying two instances of the gateway in parallel. Traffic is load-balanced between the two instances, and if one instance fails or is undergoing maintenance, the second instance continues handling traffic, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity. This configuration leverages BGP or static routing to maintain session continuity and failover capabilities.
Option B, VNet Peering, allows private communication between VNets, but does not address the high availability of the VPN gateway itself. Peering ensures low-latency communication between virtual networks, but cannot prevent downtime for the gateway service. Option C, ExpressRoute circuit, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but is not directly relevant to VPN gateway redundancy within Azure. While ExpressRoute supports high reliability, it does not replace the need for a redundant VPN gateway configuration. Option D, Azure Load Balancer, provides network-level distri, bution of traffic, but cannot directly distribute VPN Gateway traffic for high availability. It is primarily used to balance traffic among virtual machines or services, not to provide redundancy for gateway instances. Therefore, the active-active VPN Gateway configuration is the optimal approach to ensure continuous hybrid connectivity and minimise downtime during failures or maintenance events.
Question 7:
You need to implement network segmentation in Azure to isolate workloads while allowing controlled communication where necessary. Which combination of Azure features is most suitable?
A) VNets and NSGs
B) VPN Gateway and ExpressRoute
C) Azure Firewall and Traffic Manager
D) Application Gateway and WAF
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Network segmentation in Azure can be achieved effectively using Virtual Networks (VNets) and Network Security Groups (NSGs). VNets provide logical isolation, allowing workloads to reside in separate subnets, effectively segmenting different parts of your infrastructure. NSGs enable granular control over network traffic by applying allow or deny rules at the subnet or network interface level. Together, VNets and NSGs allow administrators to implement micro-segmentation, defining clear communication boundaries between workloads while permitting necessary connectivity based on business requirements.
Option B, VPN Gateway and ExpressRoute, is focused on hybrid connectivity rather than segmentation. While they can extend networks and facilitate secure communication, they do not provide granular internal segmentation or control between subnets and resources. Option C, Azure Firewall and Traffic Manager, serves different purposes. Azure Firewall centralises traffic inspection and enforcement, while Traffic Manager directs traffic based on DNS, performance, or geographic rules. While helpful for network security and routing, they are not a replacement for segmentation of internal Azure resources. Option D, Application Gateway and WAF, addresses application-level load balancing and security at layer 7. This protects web applications, but does not provide network-level segmentation between internal workloads. Therefore, combining VNets with NSGs is the most appropriate strategy for internal network segmentation while maintaining controlled communication.
Question 8:
You are designing a scalable Azure network where multiple VNets in different subscriptions must communicate. You want to avoid creating peering between each pair of VNets. Which solution is most suitable?
A) Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Virtual WAN
B) Individual VNet peering for all VNets
C) ExpressRoute per VNet
D) Azure Load Balancer
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A hub-and-spoke architecture implemented with Azure Virtual WAN allows multiple VNets (spokes) to connect to a central hub, enabling inter-VNet communication without creating point-to-point peering between each pair. This significantly simplifies network management, reduces configuration complexity, and allows scalable growth as additional VNets are deployed. Virtual WAN also supports automatic route propagation, monitoring, and optimised connectivity for hybrid environments.
Option B, individual VNet peering, requires N*(N-1)/2 connections for N VNets, which becomes unmanageable as the number of VNets increases. It introduces administrative overhead and limits scalability. Option C, ExpressRoute per VNet, provides private connectivity between on-premises and Azure, but does not solve multi-VNet interconnectivity within Azure. Each VNet would still require its own routing and potentially additional peering or hub configuration. Option D, Azure Load Balancer, distributes traffic among VMs or endpoints, but does not provide VNet-to-VNet connectivity. It cannot facilitate network-level communication between multiple VNets. Therefore, Azure Virtual WAN with a hub-and-spoke topology is the most efficient and scalable solution for multi-VNet communication.
Question 9:
You need to restrict traffic between subnets in a VNet and allow only specific ports for certain workloads. Which Azure feature provides the most efficient solution?
A) NSGs
B) Azure Firewall
C) Route Tables
D) ExpressRoute
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Network Security Groups (NSGs) provide granular traffic filtering at both the subnet and network interface levels. Administrators can create rules to allow or deny traffic based on source and destination IP addresses, protocols, and ports. NSGs are efficient because they enforce rules close to the resources, minimising unnecessary exposure while allowing fine-grained control. They are particularly effective in scenarios where multiple workloads need isolated communication patterns within the same VNet or across subnets.
Option B, Azure Firewall, is a centralised, managed network security solution that can enforce complex rules, including fully qualified domain names (FQDNs) and threat intelligence filtering. While powerful, it introduces additional cost and complexity and is not required for straightforward port-based subnet restrictions. Option C, Route Tables, control how packets are routed within a VNet or to external networks. They cannot enforce security policies based on ports or protocols, making them unsuitable for traffic restriction. Option D, ExpressRoute, provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises and Azure, but does not manage traffic restrictions or enforce security rules at the subnet level. Therefore, NSGs provide the most efficient and effective method for controlling subnet-level traffic based on specific ports.
Question 10:
You need to implement a load-balancing solution that distributes incoming traffic based on the fastest response time across multiple Azure regions. Which Azure service should you use?
A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Standard Load Balancer
C) Application Gateway
D) Azure Firewall
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure Traffic Manager is a DNS-based traffic routing service that can direct clients to the best-performing endpoints across regions using routing methods such as performance-based routing. This ensures that users are connected to the endpoint with the lowest latency, improving application responsiveness. Traffic Manager works independently of the network layer, allowing routing decisions based on real-time monitoring of endpoint availability and performance.
Option B, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and distributes traffic within a single region. It cannot route traffic across multiple regions or make decisions based on endpoint performance metrics globally. Option C, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing, SSL offloading, and application firewall capabilities within a single region, but it does not perform global performance-based routing. Option D, Azure Firewall, secures network traffic but does not provide load balancing or endpoint selection based on performance. Therefore, Azure Traffic Manager is the most appropriate solution for globally distributed traffic management with latency optimisation.
Question 11:
You are designing a hybrid network where multiple branch offices need access to Azure VNets. You want dynamic routing so that route updates propagate automatically between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure VPN Gateway with BGP
B) Azure ExpressRoute without BGP
C) NSGs
D) Azure Load Balancer
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure VPN Gateway with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the ideal solution for enabling dynamic routing in hybrid networks. When you have multiple branch offices or on-premises networks that need access to Azure VNets, static routing can become cumbersome because every route change or network addition requires manual updates on all VPN devices. BGP solves this by enabling automatic propagation of routes between the Azure VPN Gateway and on-premises routers. This ensures that route tables are updated dynamically, providing seamless connectivity across the hybrid network.
Option B, Azure ExpressRoute without BGP, provides private, dedicated connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. However, without BGP, route propagation is static, requiring manual configuration of IP prefixes and updates whenever network topology changes. This is manageable for small, stable networks, but does not scale effectively for multiple branches or dynamic environments. Option C, NSGs, are used to control inbound and outbound traffic by defining allow or deny rules at the subnet or NIC level. While they are critical for security, NSGs do not handle routing or dynamic propagation of network routes, making them irrelevant for this requirement. Option D, Azure Load Balancer, is used to distribute traffic across virtual machines or services within a region, but it is not designed for hybrid routing or BGP integration.
In conclusion, Azure VPN Gateway with BGP provides a highly reliable and scalable method to ensure dynamic route updates between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. This approach reduces administrative overhead, prevents misconfigurations, and ensures that all branch offices maintain continuous, optimised connectivity. Additionally, it supports high availability through active-active gateway configurations, further enhancing reliability for enterprise-grade hybrid networks. It allows seamless integration with existing enterprise routing architectures, ensures that traffic is efficiently routed to the closest available endpoints, and provides monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities to detect and address routing issues promptly. For organisations planning large-scale hybrid deployments or anticipating frequent network changes, this configuration provides the flexibility and resilience necessary for modern enterprise networking, making it the most suitable choice among the given options.
Question 12:
You need to implement a solution that monitors all inbound and outbound network flows in Azure for auditing and compliance purposes. Which Azure service should you deploy?
A) Azure Network Watcher
B) NSGs
C) VNet Peering
D) ExpressRoute
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure Network Watcher is the comprehensive monitoring solution for Azure networks. It allows administrators to capture flow logs, analyse network traffic, detect connectivity issues, and audit both inbound and outbound flows. Flow logs provide granular details about source and destination IP addresses, ports, protocols, and packet counts. This capability is critical for compliance with industry standards, regulatory audits, and internal governance requirements. Network Watcher also enables connection monitoring, packet capture, topology analysis, and diagnostic troubleshooting, providing a full suite of monitoring and observability tools.
Option B, NSGs, provide network traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level. While NSGs can log allowed or denied flows if diagnostic logging is enabled, they are primarily designed for security enforcement, not comprehensive auditing and compliance monitoring. NSGs cannot provide the holistic visibility, traffic analysis, or connection diagnostics that Network Watcher offers. Option C, VNet Peering, is designed to connect VNets privately and efficiently. It facilitates secure communication, but does not provide monitoring, logging, or flow analysis capabilities. Option D, ExpressRoute, provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, ensuring predictable performance and low latencybut it does not provide detailed monitoring or auditing capabilities for traffic within Azure.
Azure Network Watcher is therefore the most suitable choice because it provides extensive visibility into network traffic patterns, allows identification of anomalies, helps troubleshoot performance bottlenecks, and enables compliance reporting. Its flow logging can integrate with Azure Monitor and Log Analytics, providing long-term storage, query capabilities, and visualisation dashboards. Enterprises can use this data to understand application behaviour, enforce security policies, optimise network performance, and generate reports for auditors. In environments with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS, Network Watcher flow logs are indispensable for proving that only authorised traffic is allowed and that monitoring policies are effectively enforced. By leveraging Network Watcher, organisations can proactively detect misconfigurations, prevent unauthorised access, and maintain complete visibility of their network infrastructure. This makes it the superior choice for organisations that require both security enforcement and continuous compliance monitoring of Azure network flows.
Question 13:
You need to protect your Azure workloads from large-scale volumetric DDoS attacks. Which Azure service provides this protection?
A) Azure DDoS Protection Standard
B) NSGs
C) Azure Firewall
D) VNet Peering
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure DDoS Protection Standard is a managed service specifically designed to protect Azure resources from volumetric and protocol-based Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. It automatically detects and mitigates attacks, ensuring that workloads remain available and that network resources are not overwhelmed. DDoS Protection Standard integrates with VNets and can be paired with Application Gateway, Load Balancer, or Azure Firewall to provide layered security. It includes real-time telemetry, alerting, attack analytics, and mitigation reporting, which are essential for operational visibility and compliance auditing.
Option B, NSGs, provide traffic filtering at the subnet or NIC level, but are not designed to mitigate volumetric attacks. NSGs enforce allow/deny rules and are effective for preventing unauthorised traffic, but cannot absorb or mitigate large-scale DDoS attacks. Option C, Azure Firewall, provides application and network-layer traffic inspection and filtering, but is not sufficient to mitigate large-scale volumetric attacks. Firewalls can block known malicious traffic, but do not have the capacity to absorb attacks that saturate network bandwidth. Option D, VNet Peering, connects VNets privately, but provides no security mitigation or protection against DDoS attacks.
Azure DDoS Protection Standard is therefore the appropriate choice because it provides automatic attack detection and mitigation without requiring manual intervention, minimising downtime and service disruption. It is designed to scale automatically, handle sudden spikes in attack traffic, and maintain high availability of services. By combining DDoS Protection with monitoring, logging, and integration with security operations tools, organisations can ensure resilience against attacks and maintain regulatory compliance. Its metrics and reporting capabilities allow security teams to assess attack patterns, improve network architecture, and refine mitigation strategies. This service is particularly important for globally accessible applications or services exposed to the public internet, where attack attempts are more frequent and can significantly impact business continuity. Overall, DDoS Protection Standard is the definitive solution for protecting Azure workloads against volumetric and protocol-level DDoS attacks.
Question 14:
You need to enable dynamic routing between Azure VNets and on-premises network appliances. Which Azure service is most appropriate?
A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure Route Server is a managed service that enables dynamic routing between Azure VNets and on-premises or network virtual appliances using BGP. Route Server allows seamless propagation of routes without manual configuration, simplifying the management of complex hybrid networks or multi-VNet topologies. It ensures that changes in network topology, such as the addition of new subnets or appliances, are automatically reflected in routing tables, reducing administrative overhead and the risk of misconfiguration.
Option B, VPN Gateway, provides connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but typically relies on static route configuration unless paired with BGP. While VPN Gateway can use active-active configurations, it is not optimised for large-scale dynamic routing scenarios between multiple VNets and appliances. Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity with predictable latency and bandwidth, but does not inherently manage dynamic route propagation between VNets or appliances without additional configuration. Option D, NSGs, enforce security policies and filter traffic, but have no capability to manage routing or propagate route updates.
Route Server is therefore the optimal choice for dynamic, scalable, and resilient routing in hybrid Azure environments. It provides automated route updates, simplifies integration with third-party network appliances, and supports high availability through zone redundancy. By deploying Route Server, organisations reduce configuration complexity, prevent routing conflicts, and maintain consistent connectivity between on-premises and Azure workloads. This ensures traffic is always directed along the most efficient path, reduces potential downtime, and enhances operational agility. Its seamless integration with Azure Monitor also allows monitoring of route propagation, troubleshooting of network issues, and validation of routing changes. For enterprise architectures with multiple VNets and hybrid connectivity requirements, Azure Route Server is indispensable for efficient, automated, and reliable routing management.
Question 15:
You want to prevent accidental deletion of critical Azure network resources while still allowing administrators to make configuration changes. Which feature should you enable?
A) Resource Locks
B) NSGs
C) Route Tables
D) Application Gateway
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Azure Resource Locks provide protection against accidental deletion or modification of critical resources. There are two types of locks: CanNotDelete and ReadOnly. The CanNotDelete lock allows modifications to the resource configuration while preventing deletion. The ReadOnly lock prevents both modifications and deletions. This mechanism is essential for critical network resources such as VNets, VPN Gateways, Load Balancers, and Firewalls, ensuring that inadvertent actions do not disrupt the network or impact dependent workloads. Resource Locks can be applied at the resource, resource group, or subscription level, providing flexibility in governance and protection strategy.
Option B, NSGs, provides traffic filtering, but does not protect resources from accidental deletion. NSGs are focused on security and cannot prevent administrative actions like deletion of the underlying VNet or subnet. Option C, Route Tables, define network routing policies, but does not enforce deletion or modification protection. They control how traffic flows, but are not governance mechanisms. Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities, but does not protect against accidental deletion of network or application resources.
Resource Locks are critical in enterprise environments where multiple administrators manage Azure resources, and inadvertent deletions can have cascading effects on workloads and connectivity. By implementing locks, organisations enforce governance policies, reduce operational risk, and maintain high availability and stability of critical network infrastructure. Locks integrate seamlessly with Azure Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), allowing fine-grained control over who can override or remove locks. Combined with monitoring and auditing, Resource Locks provide an essential layer of protection for sensitive and mission-critical Azure network resources.