Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect — Professional SAP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 12 Q166-180
Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect — Professional SAP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 166
A company wants to migrate an on-premises SQL Server database to AWS with minimal downtime. Which solution is most suitable?
A) RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS
B) RDS SQL Server only
C) Aurora PostgreSQL
D) EC2 SQL Server with manual backup/restore
Answer: A) RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS
Explanation:
RDS SQL Server alone requires downtime to export and import data. Aurora PostgreSQL is not compatible with SQL Server, requiring application and schema changes. EC2 SQL Server with manual backup/restore is operationally intensive and requires extended downtime. RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS enables near real-time replication from the source database, keeping it operational during migration. DMS ensures data integrity and allows continuous replication. RDS provides automated backups, Multi-AZ deployment, patching, and maintenance, reducing operational complexity. This approach ensures a reliable, low-downtime migration for mission-critical SQL Server workloads.
Question 167
A company wants to implement a messaging system that guarantees exactly-once processing and preserves message order. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) SQS FIFO Queue
B) SQS Standard Queue
C) SNS
D) Kinesis Data Streams
Answer: A) SQS FIFO Queue
Explanation:
SQS Standard Queue delivers messages at least once but does not guarantee order, which can cause inconsistencies. SNS is a pub/sub service and does not ensure message ordering or deduplication. Kinesis Data Streams maintains order per shard and supports high throughput, but it adds unnecessary complexity for simple microservice messaging. SQS FIFO Queue guarantees exactly-once message processing, preserves message order, and supports deduplication. It ensures reliable, predictable communication between microservices, making it ideal for transaction-sensitive workloads and maintaining data consistency across distributed systems.
Question 168
A company wants to implement a serverless architecture for processing uploaded images and messages in near real-time. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
B) EC2 polling S3 and SQS
C) ECS on EC2 launch type
D) EKS with EC2 nodes
Answer: A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
Explanation:
EC2 instances require manual scaling, patching, and monitoring, increasing operational overhead. ECS and EKS with EC2 nodes also require infrastructure management. Lambda is serverless and can be triggered directly by S3 events or SQS messages. It automatically scales according to workload and incurs cost only when code executes. Lambda integrates with CloudWatch for logging, monitoring, and error handling. This architecture enables a fully managed, event-driven system with high availability, scalability, and cost efficiency. It is ideal for workloads like image processing, ETL tasks, or order processing triggered by S3 or SQS events.
Question 169
A company wants to store session data for a high-traffic web application with extremely low latency and high throughput. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) ElastiCache Redis
B) DynamoDB
C) RDS MySQL
D) S3
Answer: A) ElastiCache Redis
Explanation:
DynamoDB provides low latency but may not consistently achieve sub-millisecond performance under heavy load. RDS MySQL introduces latency due to disk I/O and connection management. S3 is object storage and cannot efficiently handle frequent small reads/writes. ElastiCache Redis is an in-memory key-value store optimized for extremely low latency and high throughput. It supports replication, clustering, and optional persistence. Redis allows session data to be shared across multiple web servers, providing fast, reliable access, and scalability for high-traffic applications. This ensures smooth user experience and high availability while minimizing operational complexity.
Question 170
A company wants to implement a global web application with low latency for static and dynamic content. Which architecture is most suitable?
A) CloudFront with S3 for static content and ALB for dynamic content
B) S3 only
C) EC2 with ALB only
D) Route 53 only
Answer: A) CloudFront with S3 for static content and ALB for dynamic content
Explanation:
Amazon S3 is a reliable solution for hosting static content such as HTML files, images, videos, and other media assets. While it provides a cost-effective and highly durable storage option, S3 alone has limitations when it comes to delivering dynamic content efficiently or minimizing latency for a global audience. Requests for dynamic pages, APIs, or applications that require server-side processing cannot be handled directly by S3, and users located far from the S3 region may experience slower load times. This makes S3 alone insufficient for scenarios that demand fast, interactive, or personalized content delivery.
Amazon EC2, when paired with an Application Load Balancer (ALB), can address the need for dynamic content by hosting applications and processing requests in real-time. EC2 instances provide the flexibility to run custom applications, APIs, and backend services while the ALB distributes incoming traffic across multiple instances to improve availability and fault tolerance. However, this approach is typically confined to a single AWS region unless additional configurations such as global load balancing are implemented. Users located far from the region may encounter increased latency, impacting the overall performance and user experience.
Route 53 plays a crucial role in managing global traffic through intelligent DNS routing. It can direct users to the closest AWS region or endpoint, implement failover strategies, and perform health checks to ensure reliability. While Route 53 enhances routing efficiency and availability, it does not serve actual content or reduce latency for content delivery, which remains the responsibility of the underlying storage and compute resources.
To optimize performance on a global scale, Amazon CloudFront is often integrated as a content delivery network (CDN). CloudFront caches content at strategically distributed edge locations around the world, allowing users to retrieve data from a location closer to them, significantly reducing latency and improving load times. By serving cached content for frequently accessed static assets, CloudFront reduces the load on the origin servers and improves scalability during traffic spikes.
A combined architecture that leverages CloudFront with S3 for static content and EC2 behind an ALB for dynamic content provides a comprehensive solution for global content delivery. CloudFront not only accelerates the delivery of static assets but also routes dynamic requests efficiently to the appropriate origin. It integrates seamlessly with security features such as AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF), SSL/TLS encryption, and origin failover mechanisms, ensuring secure and resilient operations.
This setup ensures high availability, fault tolerance, and optimal performance for users worldwide. Static content is delivered quickly from the nearest edge location, while dynamic content benefits from the load-balanced processing power of EC2 instances. By combining these services, organizations can create a robust architecture that handles global traffic efficiently, enhances security, and delivers a consistent, smooth experience to end users regardless of their location.
while S3, EC2, Route 53, and CloudFront each serve distinct purposes, their integration provides a powerful, scalable, and globally optimized content delivery solution. This architecture maximizes speed, reliability, and security for both static and dynamic content, ensuring a seamless experience for users across the world.
Question 171
A company wants to store infrequently accessed backup data cost-effectively but with fast retrieval when needed. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval
B) S3 Standard
C) EBS gp3
D) EFS Standard
Answer: A) S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval
Explanation:
When organizations consider cloud storage options for long-term retention, backup, or disaster recovery, selecting the appropriate storage class is critical for balancing cost, performance, and accessibility. Amazon S3 Standard is designed for frequently accessed data, providing high durability and low-latency retrieval. While it excels in delivering quick access to active data, using S3 Standard for infrequently accessed backups can lead to unnecessarily high costs. Data that is rarely retrieved does not require the same performance level as active datasets, making it inefficient to rely solely on S3 Standard for archival purposes.
Elastic Block Store (EBS), particularly gp3 volumes, is another option for persistent storage, providing block-level access attached directly to EC2 instances. EBS gp3 offers high IOPS and throughput for transactional workloads or databases that demand consistent performance. However, it is not a cost-efficient solution for archival storage because the pricing model is based on provisioned storage rather than usage frequency. Storing infrequently accessed backups on EBS can quickly become expensive, as the storage is continuously allocated regardless of access patterns.
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) Standard is designed for shared file storage across multiple EC2 instances. It provides scalable and low-latency access to files that are actively used in production environments. While EFS Standard supports concurrent access and high throughput, it is generally not suited for rarely accessed archival data due to its cost structure. Maintaining backups or infrequent datasets on EFS Standard can result in high operational costs without providing any added performance benefit for archival workloads.
For cost-effective archival storage with occasional fast retrieval, Amazon S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval is an ideal solution. This storage class offers the lowest storage cost for long-term retention while providing millisecond retrieval times when data access is required. Organizations can use lifecycle policies to automatically transition data from S3 Standard or S3 Intelligent-Tiering into Glacier Instant Retrieval, streamlining management and ensuring optimal cost efficiency. This automated approach reduces manual intervention while maintaining quick access for critical archival data.
S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval is built for durability and security, offering eleven nines of data durability to protect against data loss. Encryption at rest is available via SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS, ensuring that sensitive information remains secure. Integration with AWS CloudTrail enables detailed auditing and tracking of access to archival data, supporting compliance and regulatory requirements.
Overall, Glacier Instant Retrieval provides a highly efficient solution for organizations looking to store infrequently accessed backups, compliance archives, or disaster recovery datasets. It combines low cost with fast retrieval capabilities, high durability, robust security, and auditing, making it a superior choice for archival workloads. By leveraging lifecycle policies, organizations can optimize storage costs while ensuring that critical data remains accessible when needed. This makes Glacier Instant Retrieval an optimal storage class for balancing performance, reliability, and cost in cloud-based archival strategies.
Question 172
A company wants to migrate an on-premises Oracle database to AWS with minimal downtime. Which approach is most suitable?
A) RDS Oracle with AWS DMS continuous replication
B) EC2 Oracle with manual backup and restore
C) Aurora PostgreSQL
D) DynamoDB
Answer: A) RDS Oracle with AWS DMS continuous replicationExplanation:
Migrating mission-critical Oracle workloads to the cloud requires careful planning to minimize downtime and reduce operational complexity. Traditional approaches, such as running Oracle on EC2 instances with manual backup and restore procedures, present significant challenges. These deployments demand extensive administrative effort, as system administrators must manually manage backups, handle restoration processes, and plan for failover scenarios. Any failure or error during these operations can result in prolonged downtime, which can disrupt business continuity and impact service-level agreements. Additionally, maintaining EC2-based Oracle databases requires continuous attention to patching, scaling, and monitoring, which increases the operational burden on IT teams and introduces risks associated with human error.
Alternative database options like Aurora PostgreSQL offer managed relational services with high availability, automatic backups, and scaling capabilities, but they are not directly compatible with Oracle workloads. Migrating to Aurora PostgreSQL often requires substantial changes to database schemas, stored procedures, and application logic. Organizations would need to invest significant development effort to refactor applications to accommodate the differences in SQL dialects, functions, and transaction handling between Oracle and PostgreSQL. This adds both time and complexity to migration projects, potentially delaying the adoption of cloud-based managed services.
NoSQL solutions such as Amazon DynamoDB are another option, but they are fundamentally different from relational databases and cannot support traditional Oracle workloads. DynamoDB excels at handling large-scale key-value or document-based data, but it lacks the relational features, transactional integrity, and complex query capabilities that many Oracle applications depend upon. Attempting to migrate Oracle workloads to DynamoDB would require a complete redesign of applications and data models, which is often impractical for enterprise environments.
A more practical and efficient solution for migrating Oracle workloads is to use Amazon RDS for Oracle in combination with AWS Database Migration Service (DMS). With this approach, near real-time replication can be established from the existing source database to a managed RDS Oracle instance. Importantly, the source Oracle database remains fully operational throughout the migration process, which significantly reduces downtime and ensures business continuity. AWS DMS handles schema and data replication with high reliability, preserving the integrity of both data and application logic during the migration. This allows organizations to maintain operational consistency while transitioning to a managed cloud environment.
Once the data is replicated to RDS, organizations benefit from features such as automated backups, Multi-AZ deployment for high availability, and routine maintenance managed by AWS. Multi-AZ deployment provides a synchronous standby instance in a separate availability zone, ensuring that the database remains resilient against infrastructure failures. Automatic backups simplify disaster recovery and data protection, eliminating the need for manual intervention.
Overall, leveraging RDS Oracle with AWS DMS provides a smooth, low-downtime migration path for enterprise Oracle workloads. It reduces operational complexity by automating infrastructure management, backup, and maintenance tasks while ensuring data consistency and availability. This approach enables organizations to modernize their Oracle environments in the cloud efficiently, with minimal disruption to ongoing operations, making it an ideal solution for mission-critical applications.
Question 173
A company wants to automatically stop EC2 instances in non-production environments outside business hours to reduce costs. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) Systems Manager Automation with a cron schedule
B) Auto Scaling scheduled actions only
C) Manual stopping of instances
D) Spot Instances only
Answer: A) Systems Manager Automation with a cron schedule
Explanation:
Managing non-production environments efficiently is a critical concern for organizations that aim to optimize cloud costs while maintaining operational discipline. Many teams rely on Auto Scaling scheduled actions to manage instance lifecycles, but these tools are primarily designed with production workloads in mind. Consequently, they offer limited utility for development, testing, or staging instances, which often follow different usage patterns and schedules than production systems. Simply applying production-oriented automation to non-production workloads can result in either underutilization of resources or unnecessary expenditure.
Another common approach involves manually stopping and starting instances. While simple in concept, manual intervention introduces a high potential for error. IT staff must remember to shut down resources at the end of the day and restart them at the beginning of the next work period. Mistakes in timing or oversight can lead to instances running when they are not needed, causing wasted costs, or remaining stopped when developers require access, delaying projects and reducing productivity. The human dependency inherent in this method also increases operational burden, as ongoing monitoring and scheduling require continuous attention and coordination.
Spot Instances provide an alternative cost-saving strategy, allowing organizations to take advantage of unused EC2 capacity at significantly reduced prices. While they can help lower infrastructure costs for interruptible workloads, Spot Instances do not inherently provide mechanisms for automated scheduling. Without additional automation, teams must still manage start and stop times manually, which diminishes the operational efficiencies that automation seeks to provide. Coordinating this for multiple environments simultaneously can quickly become unwieldy and error-prone.
AWS Systems Manager Automation offers a more robust and reliable solution to these challenges. By allowing the creation of automated runbooks, teams can define schedules for starting or stopping EC2 instances in alignment with business hours or development cycles. Using cron expressions, these automated workflows execute consistently, ensuring that non-production instances are active only when needed. This reduces the operational overhead associated with manual intervention, eliminates the risk of human error, and helps organizations maintain tighter control over cloud spending.
Additionally, Systems Manager Automation supports auditing and compliance tracking. Each automated action is logged, providing visibility into when instances were started or stopped, which is essential for governance and cost accountability. This approach scales efficiently across multiple environments, making it ideal for organizations managing numerous development, test, or staging instances. By optimizing resource usage without affecting availability during working hours, teams achieve a balance of cost efficiency, reliability, and operational simplicity.
while traditional Auto Scaling, manual intervention, and Spot Instances offer partial solutions, they fall short for non-production workloads that require predictable scheduling and governance. Systems Manager Automation addresses these gaps effectively by providing automated, auditable, and scalable management of EC2 instances. This ensures non-production environments are cost-efficient, consistently managed, and fully available when required, creating a reliable and streamlined operational model for modern cloud infrastructure.
Question 174
A company wants to implement a messaging system that guarantees exactly-once processing and preserves message order. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) SQS FIFO Queue
B) SQS Standard Queue
C) SNS
D) Kinesis Data Streams
Answer: A) SQS FIFO Queue
Explanation:
In distributed systems and microservice architectures, ensuring reliable and consistent communication between services is essential. When services depend on the timely and ordered delivery of messages, choosing the appropriate messaging solution can significantly impact system performance, reliability, and operational complexity. Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) Standard Queue is a widely used option that provides at-least-once delivery of messages. This means that every message sent to the queue will eventually be delivered, but it does not guarantee the order in which messages are received. For many use cases, this level of reliability is sufficient, but for workflows where the sequence of operations is critical, SQS Standard Queue can introduce inconsistencies. Messages may be processed out of order, requiring developers to implement additional logic in the application to reorder messages or handle potential duplicates, increasing complexity.
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) provides a publish-subscribe messaging model, allowing multiple subscribers to receive the same message simultaneously. SNS is excellent for broadcasting notifications or events to multiple endpoints, but it does not ensure that messages arrive in a specific order. Furthermore, SNS does not perform deduplication, meaning subscribers may receive the same message more than once in certain scenarios. While this makes SNS suitable for alerting or fan-out scenarios, it is less appropriate for transactional workloads where precise sequencing and exactly-once delivery are essential.
Amazon Kinesis Data Streams offers another approach, focusing on high-throughput data streaming with ordering guarantees per shard. Kinesis is designed to handle real-time streaming and can process large volumes of events in sequence within individual shards. While it provides both ordering and scalability, Kinesis introduces additional operational complexity, including the management of shards, scaling, checkpointing, and ensuring fault tolerance. For simple microservice messaging where developers need reliable communication without extensive infrastructure management, Kinesis may be more complex than necessary.
For scenarios that require strict ordering, deduplication, and exactly-once processing, Amazon SQS FIFO Queue provides a highly effective solution. FIFO queues ensure that messages are processed in the exact order they are sent, eliminating the risk of out-of-sequence execution. They also automatically deduplicate messages sent within a specified time window, preventing the processing of duplicates due to retries or network issues. These guarantees make FIFO queues particularly suitable for transaction-sensitive applications, including order processing, financial transactions, and inventory management, where consistency and reliability are critical.
By using SQS FIFO Queue, developers can simplify microservice communication, reduce operational complexity, and maintain predictable workflows. Applications can rely on consistent message ordering without implementing additional logic for deduplication or sequencing. This enables distributed systems to operate more reliably and ensures that transactional integrity is preserved. Compared to Standard Queues, SNS, or Kinesis for basic messaging, FIFO queues provide a straightforward yet powerful mechanism for ensuring exactly-once, ordered, and deduplicated message delivery across services. For organizations building complex microservice architectures, SQS FIFO Queue serves as an optimal messaging backbone, balancing simplicity, reliability, and operational efficiency.
Question 175
A company wants to implement a serverless architecture for processing uploaded images and messages in near real-time. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
B) EC2 polling S3 and SQS
C) ECS on EC2 launch type
D) EKS with EC2 nodes
Answer: A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
Explanation:
In traditional cloud deployments, Amazon EC2 instances provide raw compute capacity, but managing them comes with significant operational responsibilities. EC2 servers require manual patching to ensure security updates are applied, monitoring to detect failures or performance issues, and scaling to handle changes in workload demand. All of these tasks demand ongoing attention from operations teams, increasing both complexity and operational overhead. Similarly, container orchestration services such as Amazon ECS or Amazon EKS, when deployed using EC2 nodes, also necessitate managing the underlying infrastructure. This includes maintaining the cluster, scaling nodes to meet application demands, and applying updates or patches to ensure both performance and security. While these services offer powerful capabilities for containerized applications, the management burden can be substantial, especially for organizations seeking to focus more on application development rather than infrastructure maintenance.
AWS Lambda offers an alternative approach through its fully serverless architecture. As an event-driven compute service, Lambda can be triggered by a variety of sources, including Amazon S3 events when objects are uploaded or SQS messages when new data arrives in a queue. Unlike EC2 or EC2-backed container services, Lambda automatically handles all aspects of scaling. As the workload increases, Lambda provisions additional execution instances, and when activity decreases, resources are automatically released. This ensures applications remain responsive without requiring manual intervention, and it eliminates the need for dedicated capacity planning. Another key advantage of Lambda is its cost model: charges are applied only for the duration of code execution, rather than for idle server time, which significantly reduces operational costs for variable workloads.
Lambda also integrates tightly with Amazon CloudWatch, enabling detailed logging, monitoring, and error handling. Developers can track function execution metrics, identify performance bottlenecks, and respond to failures without the need for extensive custom monitoring solutions. CloudWatch provides both operational visibility and alerting capabilities, which help maintain high availability and reliability for serverless applications. This monitoring integration, combined with the automatic scaling and managed infrastructure, allows development teams to focus on building business logic and delivering new features rather than managing servers.
This fully managed, event-driven architecture is particularly well suited for workloads such as image processing, ETL (extract, transform, load) jobs, and order processing systems triggered by data uploads to S3 or messages in SQS queues. For example, when a new image is uploaded to S3, Lambda can automatically process the image, generate thumbnails, or update a database, all without provisioning servers. Similarly, an incoming order placed in an SQS queue can trigger a Lambda function to update inventory, notify downstream systems, or process payments efficiently and reliably.
By adopting Lambda for these use cases, organizations can achieve high availability, seamless scalability, and cost efficiency while minimizing operational overhead. This approach removes the complexity of infrastructure management associated with EC2 and EC2-backed container orchestration, allowing teams to focus entirely on application logic. Lambda provides a robust, serverless solution for modern, event-driven architectures, ensuring that workloads are processed reliably and efficiently without manual intervention, making it an ideal choice for automated, responsive systems.
Question 176
A company wants to migrate an on-premises SQL Server database to AWS with minimal downtime. Which solution is most suitable?
A) RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS
B) RDS SQL Server only
C) Aurora PostgreSQL
D) EC2 SQL Server with manual backup/restore
Answer: A) RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS
Explanation:
RDS SQL Server alone requires downtime to export and import data, which is unsuitable for production workloads. Aurora PostgreSQL is not SQL Server-compatible, requiring extensive schema and application changes. EC2 SQL Server with manual backup and restore is operationally intensive and requires extended downtime, increasing risk. RDS SQL Server with AWS DMS supports near real-time replication, allowing the source database to remain operational during migration. DMS ensures data integrity and minimal downtime, while RDS provides automated backups, Multi-AZ deployment, patching, and maintenance. This combination reduces operational complexity, ensures high availability, and is ideal for mission-critical SQL Server migrations.
Question 177
A company wants to implement a highly available, multi-AZ relational database for production workloads. Which AWS service is most appropriate?
A) RDS Multi-AZ Deployment
B) RDS Single-AZ Deployment
C) DynamoDB
D) S3
Answer: A) RDS Multi-AZ Deployment
Explanation:
In cloud-based database architectures, high availability and fault tolerance are crucial considerations, particularly for mission-critical production workloads. Amazon RDS offers multiple deployment options, each catering to different operational requirements and levels of resilience. One common approach, RDS Single-AZ Deployment, hosts the database instance in a single availability zone. While this deployment option is simpler and may be suitable for development or test environments, it introduces a significant risk for production workloads. Any infrastructure failure, network disruption, or availability zone outage can result in downtime, potentially affecting applications and end users. Because it relies on a single instance in a single zone, there is no built-in mechanism to automatically fail over in the event of a failure, which makes operational recovery dependent on manual intervention.
For workloads that demand high availability, data integrity, and continuous uptime, alternatives like DynamoDB or S3 are often considered but have inherent limitations. DynamoDB, while offering excellent scalability and low-latency performance as a NoSQL database, does not provide traditional relational database features. It lacks support for complex SQL queries, joins, transactional integrity, and relational data modeling, which are essential for many enterprise applications. Similarly, Amazon S3, as an object storage service, cannot serve as a relational database. Although S3 excels at storing large amounts of unstructured data and can integrate with analytics and compute services, it cannot enforce schema constraints or support transactional operations, making it unsuitable for relational workloads.
To address these limitations while ensuring high availability and fault tolerance, Amazon RDS Multi-AZ Deployment is the preferred choice for production-grade relational databases. In this configuration, RDS automatically provisions a synchronous standby replica in a separate availability zone. The primary instance continues to handle read and write operations under normal conditions, while the standby remains in sync, continuously replicating data. If the primary instance experiences failure—whether due to hardware issues, network disruptions, or other unforeseen problems—Amazon RDS automatically promotes the standby instance to become the new primary. This failover process occurs without requiring manual intervention and typically completes within minutes, minimizing downtime and reducing the risk of data loss.
Beyond failover, RDS Multi-AZ also provides automated maintenance, patching, and backups in a way that does not disrupt database availability. Routine administrative tasks, such as software updates or minor system maintenance, are handled seamlessly, further reducing operational complexity. This combination of automated replication, failover, and maintenance ensures that production applications remain resilient, performant, and continuously available.
RDS Multi-AZ Deployment delivers a highly reliable, fault-tolerant, and easy-to-manage relational database solution. Unlike Single-AZ deployments, which leave workloads exposed to downtime, or alternatives like DynamoDB and S3, which lack relational capabilities, Multi-AZ deployments combine high availability, automated operational management, and relational database functionality. This architecture is ideal for enterprises that require robust, mission-critical database solutions capable of sustaining consistent performance, maintaining data integrity, and supporting complex relational operations in production environments.
Question 178
A company wants to implement a global web application with low latency for both static and dynamic content. Which architecture is most suitable?
A) CloudFront with S3 for static content and ALB for dynamic content
B) S3 only
C) EC2 with ALB only
D) Route 53 only
Answer: A) CloudFront with S3 for static content and ALB for dynamic content
Explanation:
Delivering web applications efficiently to a global audience requires careful consideration of both content type and geographic distribution. Amazon S3 is a highly reliable object storage service capable of hosting static content such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and videos. It provides durability, scalability, and ease of access, making it an ideal choice for static web hosting. However, S3 alone cannot handle dynamic content or server-side processing, and it does not include built-in global caching. As a result, users located far from the S3 bucket’s region may experience higher latency and slower response times when accessing content.
Amazon EC2 paired with an Application Load Balancer (ALB) can deliver dynamic content by distributing incoming requests across multiple instances in a single region. This configuration enhances availability and fault tolerance within that region, ensuring that applications can handle varying loads without downtime. While effective for serving dynamic content locally, EC2 with ALB does not inherently reduce latency for users located in other regions. Global audiences may still encounter slower load times, as the requests must traverse longer network paths to reach the regional infrastructure.
Amazon Route 53 complements these services by providing highly available and scalable Domain Name System (DNS) routing. It can direct users to the appropriate regional endpoints based on policies such as latency-based routing, geolocation, or failover. While Route 53 ensures that traffic is routed intelligently, it does not cache content or reduce repeated requests, which means it cannot optimize delivery speed by itself.
To address these limitations, Amazon CloudFront serves as a global content delivery network (CDN) that significantly enhances performance and reliability. CloudFront caches both static and dynamic content at edge locations distributed worldwide, minimizing latency by bringing content closer to end users. By storing frequently accessed files in these edge locations, CloudFront reduces the distance that data must travel, leading to faster load times and improved user experience. For dynamic content, CloudFront can forward requests to origin servers such as an EC2 ALB while still benefiting from edge optimizations for static resources.
Combining these services creates a highly effective architecture for global web applications. S3 can continue to host static assets, which are cached at CloudFront edge locations, while dynamic content is processed by EC2 instances behind an ALB. CloudFront ensures rapid delivery of static assets, improves caching efficiency, and reduces origin load, while the ALB handles scaling and high availability for dynamic requests. Security is enhanced through CloudFront integration with AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF), SSL/TLS encryption for secure traffic, and origin failover mechanisms for resilience against regional failures.
This hybrid architecture provides a globally optimized, fault-tolerant solution that balances performance, scalability, and security. By leveraging S3 for static content, EC2 with ALB for dynamic processing, Route 53 for intelligent DNS routing, and CloudFront for global content delivery, organizations can ensure low-latency access to web applications for users anywhere in the world. It represents an ideal strategy for businesses that require a highly responsive and secure web presence, capable of handling both static and dynamic workloads efficiently across multiple regions.
Question 179
A company wants to store session data for a high-traffic web application with extremely low latency. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) ElastiCache Redis
B) DynamoDB
C) RDS MySQL
D) S3
Answer: A) ElastiCache Redis
Explanation:
When designing applications that require fast and reliable access to frequently accessed data, selecting the right storage and caching solution is crucial. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database that offers low-latency access to structured data. It scales automatically to handle large workloads, making it suitable for many high-traffic applications. However, under very high load or with complex query patterns, DynamoDB may not consistently provide sub-millisecond response times. Applications that demand extremely fast data retrieval and high throughput may require additional optimization or a complementary caching layer to meet stringent performance requirements.
Amazon RDS MySQL is another common choice for relational workloads. While it provides robust transactional support, ACID compliance, and familiar SQL capabilities, it relies on disk-based storage. This introduces input/output latency, and database connections can further contribute to response delays, especially under heavy load. Applications that need immediate, repeated access to the same dataset may experience bottlenecks when relying solely on RDS for performance-critical operations.
Amazon S3 is an object storage service ideal for storing large volumes of files, such as images, videos, or backups. It offers high durability and scalability, but S3 is not optimized for frequent, small read or write operations. Applications that perform numerous low-latency data accesses can encounter higher latency and throughput limitations when using S3 as the primary data store, making it unsuitable for real-time session management or frequently updated datasets.
To address these challenges, Amazon ElastiCache for Redis provides an in-memory key-value store that is specifically optimized for ultra-low latency and high throughput. Because Redis stores data entirely in memory, it can serve requests in microseconds, making it an excellent choice for caching frequently accessed data, session information, leaderboards, or real-time analytics. ElastiCache supports replication and clustering, which enables horizontal scaling and ensures fault tolerance. Optional persistence features allow data to be saved to disk, combining the speed of in-memory storage with durability when needed.
Using Redis as a caching layer allows session data and frequently accessed information to be shared across multiple web servers, ensuring consistent user experience regardless of which server handles a request. By offloading read-heavy or repetitive queries from primary databases like DynamoDB or RDS, Redis significantly reduces operational load, enhances application performance, and improves overall scalability. Developers can also leverage built-in features such as expiration policies and pub/sub messaging to optimize application behavior further and maintain responsiveness during peak traffic periods.
Implementing ElastiCache Redis alongside existing data stores minimizes operational complexity while maintaining high availability. The combination of replication, automatic failover, and clustering ensures that the system remains resilient, even under heavy traffic. For applications where user experience depends on fast and predictable response times, Redis provides a reliable and efficient solution, bridging the performance gap between persistent databases and the demands of real-time, high-traffic workloads. This approach ensures optimal performance, reduced latency, and a seamless experience for end users, even in dynamic, large-scale environments.
Question 180
A company wants to implement serverless, event-driven processing for files uploaded to S3 and messages from SQS. Which AWS service is most suitable?
A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
B) EC2 polling S3 and SQS
C) ECS on EC2 launch type
D) EKS with EC2 nodes
Answer: A) Lambda triggered by S3 and SQS
Explanation:
In modern cloud architectures, managing compute resources efficiently is essential for reducing operational overhead and ensuring scalability. Traditional Amazon EC2 instances provide a flexible infrastructure environment, allowing organizations to run applications on virtual servers. However, these instances require continuous manual management, including scaling to match workload demands, applying security patches, and monitoring performance metrics. This manual approach can increase administrative complexity, potentially introducing delays or errors, particularly in dynamic workloads where demand fluctuates unpredictably.
Container-based services, such as Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS, offer orchestration capabilities that simplify deployment of containerized applications. When using ECS or EKS with EC2 nodes, the underlying compute infrastructure still requires management. Administrators must provision, patch, and scale EC2 instances while maintaining cluster health, ensuring that containers have adequate resources, and monitoring the overall system. Although ECS and EKS provide benefits for container scheduling and orchestration, the responsibility for managing the servers remains with the user, adding operational overhead.
For teams looking to minimize infrastructure management, AWS Lambda provides a fully serverless alternative. Lambda allows developers to run code in response to events without the need to provision or maintain servers. It can be directly triggered by various AWS services, including S3 for file uploads or SQS for message queue events. This event-driven approach enables applications to respond automatically to changes in the environment, such as new data arriving in a storage bucket or a message being added to a queue, ensuring real-time processing without human intervention.
Lambda automatically adjusts compute capacity to meet workload requirements. Whether a single event triggers a function or thousands occur simultaneously, Lambda scales seamlessly, executing each request independently and in parallel. Billing is consumption-based, meaning costs are incurred only for the actual execution duration and resource usage, eliminating charges for idle capacity. This model improves cost efficiency while providing a highly elastic compute environment.
Integration with AWS CloudWatch further enhances the Lambda experience by offering robust logging, monitoring, and error handling capabilities. CloudWatch allows teams to track performance metrics, capture logs for debugging, and create alarms for anomalous behavior, ensuring operational visibility and reliability. Together, Lambda and CloudWatch form a cohesive, managed environment that supports resilient, scalable, and observable applications.
This serverless, event-driven architecture is particularly suited for workloads such as ETL processes, image or video processing, and order processing pipelines that rely on incoming events from S3 or SQS. By removing the need for manual server management and providing automatic scaling, Lambda enables organizations to focus on application logic and business requirements rather than operational complexity. This approach ensures high availability, consistent performance, and cost optimization, delivering a dependable, fully managed solution for modern cloud-native applications.