A Comprehensive Guide to Acing Git Interview Questions

The domains of application and software development are currently experiencing an unparalleled surge in demand within the dynamic IT landscape. This remarkable expansion is largely attributable to the pervasive digital transformation sweeping across businesses globally. Consequently, for those aspiring to cultivate a prolific and impactful career in software or application development, the opportunities are indeed abundant! Your immediate imperative is to meticulously identify the quintessential tools that will provide your career with a robust and enduring impetus. Amongst these, an in-depth understanding of Git is paramount, and familiarity with common Git interview questions can offer a significant advantage.

According to a recent developer survey conducted by Stack Overflow, an impressive seventy percent of developers actively incorporate Git into their workflows. The widespread application of Git across both commercial and open-source software development initiatives unequivocally underscores its immense potential. Furthermore, the diverse spectrum of benefits that Git confers upon businesses, individual developers, and collaborative teams alike provides compelling justifications for its ubiquitous adoption.

To master the foundational principles of Git, including its core functionalities and fundamental workflow for meticulously managing source code in your projects, consider enrolling in a dedicated online course on Git fundamentals. Such a course can provide the essential groundwork for your journey.

Navigating the Git Interview Landscape: Essential Questions

Given the pervasive popularity and indispensable nature of Git in modern software development, it is prudent to thoroughly examine the most frequently encountered Git interview questions. Engaging in mock interview scenarios, particularly by practicing with these questions, significantly bolsters a candidate’s confidence. Moreover, it serves as an invaluable mechanism for gauging the inherent difficulty level of various questions, thereby enabling candidates to formulate appropriate and nuanced answering strategies. For instance, a common pitfall is to provide an excessively verbose explanation for a basic conceptual question or a generic, unspecific response for a process-oriented query, both of which can yield unfavorable results during an interview.

The subsequent discourse will systematically categorize Git interview questions into three distinct tiers: fundamental, intermediate, and advanced. This structured arrangement is meticulously designed to guide candidates in discerning the optimal approach for answering each type of interview question. Crucially, it empowers candidates to articulate their responses directly and succinctly, thereby enhancing their ability to impress interviewers and augment their prospects of securing a coveted position.

Foundational Git Interview Questions

Whether you are a recent graduate embarking on your professional journey or an experienced professional with several years in the field, you are highly likely to encounter foundational questions pertaining to Git during your interview. This section is dedicated to covering these essential introductory queries. Let’s proceed.

1. What is Git?

Answer: This question is almost universally present in discussions revolving around the most popular Git interview questions. Git stands as a distributed version control system (DVCS) and a Source Code Management System (SCMS) fundamentally designed to meticulously track changes to files over time. Its core functionality empowers developers with the profound ability to revert to any specific past modification with precision. Furthermore, Git is exceptionally adept at facilitating the efficient management of projects, irrespective of their scale—from diminutive endeavors to sprawling, complex undertakings—all while maintaining superior speed and efficacy. The inherent distributed architecture of Git is the primary determinant of its supremacy when compared to traditional, centralized version control systems. A salient characteristic of Git is its independence from a central server for the storage of all versions of files within a project, a design choice that confers significant advantages in terms of resilience and accessibility.

2. Is there a distinction between Git and GitHub?

Answer: Candidates often encounter this distinction as a basic Git interview question. Git itself is a powerful, local version control system engineered for the meticulous tracking of modifications in source code throughout the software development lifecycle. In contrast, GitHub serves as a prominent web-based repository hosting service specifically built for Git. Beyond merely hosting repositories, GitHub enriches the developer experience by providing a suite of additional features, including robust access control mechanisms, sophisticated collaboration tools, and intuitive task management functionalities tailored for various projects. Essentially, Git is the underlying technology, while GitHub is a platform that leverages Git to facilitate collaborative development.

3. What are the advantages of leveraging Git?

Answer: Candidates should be thoroughly prepared for this question, as it consistently ranks among the most common Git interview questions. The discernible benefits of adopting Git are manifold and highly impactful:

Unrestricted Project Applicability: Git can be seamlessly integrated into and utilized by any project, irrespective of its nature or complexity, without imposing inherent restrictions.
Enhanced Collaboration: Git’s architecture inherently champions and facilitates seamless collaboration among development teams, enabling multiple contributors to work concurrently on a shared codebase.
Superior Availability and Data Redundancy: Its distributed nature ensures higher availability of project history and data redundancy, as each developer’s local repository contains a complete copy of the project’s history.
Optimized Resource Utilization: Git exhibits superior disk utilization and network performance, contributing to more efficient development workflows.
Centralized Repository Information: A unique and advantageous feature is the presence of only one .git directory per repository, which consolidates all necessary Git metadata and history for that specific project.

4. Which programming language underpins Git’s development?

Answer: This question, though seemingly straightforward, is a noteworthy entry among the top Git interview questions. While simply stating the language is acceptable, candidates should endeavor to articulate the rationale behind this choice. Git is primarily written in the C programming language. This decision was deliberately made to minimize runtime overheads, which are often encountered in higher-level programming languages, thereby ensuring Git’s remarkable speed and efficiency in handling version control operations.

5. Define a Git repository and outline the process for its creation.

Answer: Candidates will navigate a degree of technicality when addressing this foundational Git interview question. In Git, a repository functions as the designated location where Git meticulously stores all project files. These files can reside either in a local repository (on your machine) or in a remote repository (on a server). The procedure for creating a Git repository is a frequently asked query. The initial step involves creating a dedicated directory for your project. Subsequently, by navigating into this project directory and executing the command git init, you can initialize a new Git repository within that directory, transforming it into a version-controlled workspace.

6. What is the concept of a bare repository?

Answer: Candidates might encounter this query as a follow-up to repository-related questions, often appearing among the top Git interview questions. A bare repository is a specific type of Git repository that exclusively contains the version control information (the .git directory content) and does not include a working tree (i.e., the verified copies of project files). Instead, all the information typically found within the .git subdirectory is directly present in the bare repository’s main directory. Conversely, a standard working directory contains the working tree (your project files) and a .git subdirectory that holds all the Git-related revision history for your repository. Bare repositories are typically used as central repositories on servers that developers clone from.

7. How does Git fundamentally differ from SVN (Subversion)?

Answer: The distinctions between Git and SVN represent a significant point of inquiry among the best Git interview questions.

Large Files and Binaries: Git, by its distributed nature, generally does not possess optimal inherent functionality for efficiently managing excessively large files or frequently fluctuating binary files directly within the repository history. SVN, on the other hand, is often considered more capable in handling very large files and binaries due to its centralized design.
Multi-Project Management: SVN offers the capability to manage multiple distinct projects within the same monolithic repository. Git, conversely, is typically designed for managing a single project per repository.
Cross-Branch/Tag Commits: Git fundamentally lacks direct support for single commits that span across multiple branches or tags simultaneously. In contrast, SVN (Subversion) provides greater flexibility, allowing committers to treat a tag as a branch and enabling the creation of multiple revisions under a tag root.
Immutability of History: Modifications to committed history in Git are generally discouraged and can be complex, as Git’s strength lies in its cryptographic integrity protecting history. SVN, being centralized, allows for simpler historical modifications (though still generally discouraged).
Architecture: The most fundamental difference is that Git is a distributed version control system (DVCS), where every developer has a full copy of the repository. SVN is a centralized version control system (CVCS), relying on a central server for all operations. The distributed nature of Git often confers significant advantages in terms of resilience, offline work capabilities, and faster operations compared to the centralized model of SVN.

8. What is a Git Commit, and what constitutes a commit object?

Answer: Candidates should prioritize a thorough understanding of this question, as it is a core basic interview question. A Git commit is a command executed during a project’s development cycle to formally record the progress of the project at a specific point in time. Each commit encapsulates a «snapshot» of the project’s files. The commit object itself is a fundamental data structure in Git that contains:

A Set of Files (Tree Object): This represents the precise state of the project’s files and directory structure at the moment the commit was made.
Reference to Parent Commit(s): For most commits, this is a reference to the immediate preceding commit, forming a linear history. Merge commits have multiple parent references.
Metadata: This includes information about the commit, such as the author’s name and email, the committer’s name and email, the timestamp of the commit, and a commit message (a descriptive note explaining the changes).
SHA-1 Hash: A unique, 40-character SHA-1 (Secure Hash Algorithm 1) hexadecimal string that serves as a unique identifier for that specific commit object. This hash cryptographically ties together the commit’s content and its history, ensuring data integrity.

9. Beyond GitHub, what are other prominent Git repository hosting services?

Answer: This question is a prominent entry among the best Git interview questions, demonstrating broader industry awareness. In addition to GitHub, other well-known and widely used Git repository hosting services include GitLab, Bitbucket, GitEnterprise (often for on-premises solutions), and SourceForge. Each offers a unique set of features and caters to different user or organizational needs.

10. Describe the concept of a conflict in Git.

Answer: Candidates frequently encounter questions regarding conflicts in Git as part of basic Git interview questions. Git is inherently intelligent and can automatically handle the vast majority of merges by leveraging its sophisticated algorithms. However, a «conflict» becomes evident when Git is unable to automatically reconcile changes. This typically occurs in scenarios where:

Simultaneous Edits on the Same Line: Two different branches introduce edits to the exact same line within a file.
Deletion and Modification: A file is deleted on one branch, while simultaneously, the same file is modified on another branch.

Conflicts are a normal and expected occurrence, particularly when operating within a collaborative team environment where multiple individuals are contributing to the same codebase. Git will pause the merge process and highlight these conflicting areas, requiring manual intervention to resolve them.

11. Outline the process for resolving conflicts in Git.

Answer: This question is a prominent entrant among the top Git interview questions and is often asked in conjunction with the definition of a Git conflict. Here are the sequential steps for effectively resolving conflicts in Git:

Identify Conflicting Files: Git will explicitly inform you which files contain merge conflicts. You can also use git status to see the list of unmerged paths.
Edit the Conflicting Files: Manually open each conflicting file. Git inserts «conflict markers» (like <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) to delineate the conflicting sections. You must manually edit these sections to combine the desired changes from both branches, effectively removing the markers.
Stage the Resolved Files: After making the necessary changes to resolve the conflict within the files, you must add these modified files to the staging area using the command git add <filename(s)>. This signifies that you have resolved the conflicts for those files.
Commit the Resolution: The final step involves committing the resolved changes. Git will automatically suggest a commit message that includes information about the merge. You can modify this message if desired, and then complete the merge by executing the command git commit.

12. What is branching in Git, and what are its different types?

Answer: Candidates should be prepared for this conceptually important entry among the most popular Git interview questions. Branching in Git is an exceptionally powerful and helpful feature that fundamentally supports users in the creation of their own isolated line of development, allowing them to switch seamlessly between these branches. This mechanism enables users to develop new features or fix bugs in isolation, without compromising the integrity of the existing main codebase. Users can freely revert back to their old work on a different branch without affecting ongoing development.

The different types of branching strategies commonly employed in Git include:

Feature Branching: This strategy involves encapsulating all changes related to a particular new feature within its own dedicated branch. Upon thorough testing and validation of the feature, the feature branch is then merged back into the main or master branch. This isolates development of individual features.
Task Branching: Similar to feature branching, this involves incorporating new features or fixes into a dedicated branch, often including a task key or identifier in the branch name for traceability. This links development directly to specific work items.
Release Branching: This strategy involves creating a clone of a development branch (e.g., develop) when it contains a sufficient number of features deemed ready for an upcoming release. This release branch then serves as a hardening phase for bug fixes and final preparations before merging into the master (production) branch.
Hotfix Branching: (Often considered a sub-type or related to release branching) These are short-lived branches created directly from the master branch to quickly address critical bugs in production. Once fixed, they are merged back into master and typically also into the develop branch.

13. What is SubGit?

Answer: Candidates might encounter this question as an important Git interview question, particularly for roles involving migration or mixed environments. SubGit is a sophisticated tool specifically designed to facilitate seamless migration and synchronization between SVN (Subversion) and Git repositories. Its primary function is to enable the creation of a writable Git mirror of either a local or remote Subversion repository. This unique capability allows users to work concurrently with both Subversion and Git for any duration they require, providing unparalleled flexibility. SubGit also offers a notably faster one-time import mechanism for migrating from Subversion to Git. Furthermore, it boasts compatibility with the Atlassian Bitbucket server. A key advantage of SubGit is that it typically does not necessitate any fundamental changes to existing infrastructure. Moreover, SubGit offers the flexibility to leverage all features available in both Git and Subversion, making it a robust solution for hybrid version control needs.

14. What are the practical applications of git instaweb?

Answer: Questions pertaining to the practical applications of Git commands are a prominent topic for the latest Git interview questions. The git instaweb command provides a convenient utility that automatically directs a web browser to launch a web server. This server then presents a web interface to the local Git repository, allowing for quick and easy Browse of the repository’s history and contents directly through a web browser. It’s particularly useful for quickly sharing or reviewing a local repository’s state without setting up a full-fledged web server.

15. Enumerate common Git commands and their respective uses.

Answer: Candidates can almost invariably expect this question in virtually every discussion concerning Git interview questions. Here are some of the most common Git commands, along with their primary functions:

git diff: This command is used to display the changes between commits, or between a commit and the current working tree. It shows line-by-line differences.
git status: This command provides a concise summary of the differences between the current working directory and the index (staging area), indicating which files are staged, unstaged, or untracked.
git stash apply: This command is used to reapply changes that were previously «stashed» (temporarily saved) back onto your working directory.
git log: This command helps in navigating and inspecting the project’s commit history, allowing users to find specific commits, authors, or messages.
git checkout <branch-name>: This command is used to switch branches or restore working tree files. It updates the working directory to match the specified branch or commit, without necessarily performing a merge.
git rm <file>: This command is used to remove files from both the staging area and the file system (working directory).
git add <file> or git add .: This command adds file modifications from the current directory to the index (staging area), preparing them for the next commit.
git reset <commit> or git reset —hard <commit>: This command is used to reset the index and optionally the working directory to the state of a specified commit, effectively undoing changes.
git ls-tree <tree-ish>: While git is a tree is not a standard command, git ls-tree is used for the representation of a tree object, showing the mode, type, SHA-1 hash, and name for each item within that tree (e.g., files or subdirectories).

16. What is the distinction between clone, fork, and branch in Git?

Answer: This question represents a unique and important entry among the best Git interview questions, testing a candidate’s understanding of key Git and GitHub concepts.

Fork (Social Concept): A Git «fork» is primarily a remote, server-side replica of a repository that is distinct from the original. It’s not a native Git command but rather a social paradigm prevalent on hosting platforms like GitHub. When you fork a repository, you create your own copy on the server, allowing you to freely experiment with changes without affecting the original project. This is common in open-source contributions.
Clone (Git Operation): A «clone» in Git is a local copy of a particular remote repository. When you clone, you download the entire source repository information, including all its branches and complete revision history, to your local machine. It creates a complete, functional local Git repository.
Branch (Git Operation): A «branch» is a core Git process for managing all changes within a single repository (either local or remote) before they are merged into a main codebase. You can consider a branch as a separate thread or line of development that exists within a repository, allowing concurrent work on different features or fixes in isolation.

17. How does a «branch» differ from a «pull request»?

Answer: The distinction between a branch and a pull request is a significant point of inquiry often found in DevOps interview questions for GitHub.

Branch: A branch is simply an isolated, separate version of the codebase within a Git repository. It’s a fundamental Git concept that allows developers to work on new features or bug fixes without directly affecting the main line of development.
Pull Request (PR): A pull request is a feature provided by Git hosting platforms (like GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket). It emerges when an individual takes a repository, creates their own branch (often after forking), makes modifications on that branch, and then formally proposes that their changes be merged into another code repository (typically the original project’s main branch). The pull request provides a mechanism for code review, discussion, and collaboration before the changes are integrated.

18. Do you understand the utility of git cherry-pick?

Answer: Questions about specific Git commands are a frequent occurrence in Git interview questions. The git cherry-pick command is utilized in processes for introducing specific commits from one branch in a repository directly into another branch. Its common application is evident in the forward-porting or back-porting of individual commits, for instance, taking a bug fix from a maintenance branch and applying it directly to a development branch. This approach is distinct from other integration methods like merge or rebase, which typically apply sequences of commits or entire branch histories to another branch.

19. Explain the concept of the staging area in Git.

Answer: Candidates will frequently encounter this entry among the majority of the best Git interview questions. The staging area, often referred to as the «index,» is an intermediate area or layer in Git’s workflow. It serves a crucial purpose: to format and review changes before they are formally committed to the repository. The staging area acts as a temporary holding space where you build up your next commit. It’s the first place where every change is verified and prepared before it is permanently committed to the repository’s history, allowing for fine-grained control over what gets included in each commit.

20. Is it more advisable to create an additional commit or to modify an existing commit?

Answer: Such types of entries among Git interview questions can be nuanced and potentially confusing. It is crucial to be clear that, generally, the creation of an additional commit is almost always more favorable compared to modifying an existing commit, especially if that commit has already been pushed to a shared remote repository.

Modifying an existing commit (e.g., using git commit —amend or git rebase -i) fundamentally rewrites Git history. This can be problematic because it changes the unique SHA-1 hash of the commit. If you amend a commit that others have already pulled, it creates divergent histories, leading to significant complications and requiring other developers to take corrective actions (like force-pulls or rebasing their own work).

While git commit —amend has its legitimate uses (e.g., fixing a typo in the commit message or adding a forgotten file before pushing the commit), its excessive or inappropriate use can lead to the growth of a small, focused commit into an undesirable accumulation of unrelated changes. Therefore, for changes that have already been shared, creating a new, distinct commit that either fixes or reverts previous changes is the recommended best practice, as it preserves the integrity and traceability of the project’s history.

Intermediate Level Git Interview Questions

If you possess a few years of experience working with Git, interviewers are likely to pose more command-based or conceptual questions to gauge your deeper understanding. This section presents some commonly encountered interview questions tailored for intermediate-level Git professionals. Let’s explore these questions.

21. Differentiate between the HEAD, working tree, and index in Git.

Answer: Candidates should thoroughly prepare for this entry among the latest Git interview questions, as it is a fundamental concept for intermediate-level understanding.

Working Tree (Working Directory/Workspace): This refers to the actual directory on your file system where you have your project’s source files. It’s the physical location where you see and actively edit your project’s files.
Index (Staging Area): This is a critical intermediate layer in Git. It’s a single, binary file typically located at <baseOfRepo>/.git/index. The index essentially contains a list of all files in the current branch, along with their SHA-1 checksums, file names, and timestamps. It acts as a «preview» of your next commit, allowing you to selectively choose which changes from your working tree will be included in the upcoming commit.
HEAD: The «HEAD» is a symbolic reference in Git that consistently points to the last commit in the currently checked-out branch. It indicates the tip of the branch you are currently working on. When you make a new commit, HEAD moves forward to point to that new commit.

22. What is the purpose of git config?

Answer: You will frequently encounter this question among the most popular Git interview questions. Git utilizes your username and email address to associate commits with a particular identity, ensuring proper attribution of changes. The git config command is instrumental in configuring Git’s settings, including your user identity. For instance, to set your global username and email ID that will be associated with your commits, you would use the following commands:

git config —global user.name «Your Name» (sets your username)
git config —global user.email «your.email@example.com» (sets your email ID)

This command can also be used to configure various other Git settings at the system, global (user), or local (repository) level.

23. What is git stash?

Answer: This is a key intermediate-level Git interview question that appears in the majority of Git interviews. When working on a project, especially in a dynamic environment, you might frequently find yourself in a situation where your working directory is «messy» with uncommitted changes, and you suddenly need to switch branches to address an urgent bug or work on another feature. git stash provides a powerful solution by taking your working directory (including modified tracked files and staged modifications) and temporarily storing them on a stack of unfinished changes. This cleans up your working directory, allowing you to switch branches or perform other operations. Users can then reapply these stashed changes at any time according to their preferences to continue their previous work.

24. What type of work can be restored through the recovery of a deleted branch?

Answer: Candidates should be prepared for nuanced Git interview questions like this one, which test practical knowledge of recovery. Upon successful recovery of a deleted branch, you can primarily recover the committed or stashed files that were part of that branch’s history. Importantly, untracked files (files that were present in your working directory but never added to Git’s tracking, nor stashed) are generally not recoverable through Git’s built-in mechanisms after a branch deletion. The recommended best practice to avoid data loss is to consistently stage and commit your work, or at minimum, ensure that your uncommitted changes are stashed if you need to temporarily set them aside.

25. How do git diff and git status differ in their functionality?

Answer: This entry is also a crucial question often encountered in DevOps interview questions for GitHub interviews, as it probes understanding of fundamental inspection commands.

git diff: This command is primarily used to display the detailed, line-by-line differences between various versions of files. It can show changes between:
- Your working directory and the staging area.
- The staging area and the last commit.
- Two different commits.
- Two different branches. It provides a precise representation of what has changed.
git status: This command, on the other hand, provides a high-level summary of the state of your working directory and the staging area relative to your last commit. It tells you which files have changed, which files are staged for the next commit, and which files are untracked. It does not typically show the detailed line-by-line changes themselves, but rather gives you an overview of the «status» of your repository regarding modifications.

The prominent difference is that git diff shows the actual content differences, while git status provides a summary of the files that are in different states.

26. How can I ascertain if a specific branch has already been merged into the master branch?

Answer: The answer to this type of Git interview question is generally straightforward, demonstrating practical Git usage. The following commands can be effectively used to determine whether a particular branch has been merged into the master (or any other current) branch:

git branch —merged: This command lists all branches that have been fully merged into the currently checked-out branch (typically master or main).
git branch —no-merged: Conversely, this command lists all branches that have not yet been merged into the currently checked-out branch.

By checking the output of these commands, you can quickly identify the merge status of any given branch.

27. What are the typical contents found within the hooks directory in Git?

Answer: Candidates might encounter this entry among the latest Git interview questions, testing their knowledge of Git’s extensibility. The .git/hooks directory within a Git repository contains a collection of shell scripts (or other executable scripts) that are designed to be automatically executed by Git at specific points in its workflow. These scripts are known as «hooks.» For instance, Git would attempt the execution of a post-commit script immediately after a commit operation has successfully completed. Examples include pre-commit (runs before a commit), post-commit (runs after a commit), pre-receive (on the remote server before a push), and post-receive (on the remote server after a push). They enable customization and automation of various Git actions.

28. How can I obtain a list of files that were changed in a specific commit?

Answer: Candidates will find practical questions like this frequently among the most popular Git interview questions, as it tests direct command-line usage. The answer is quite simple and involves using a variant of the git diff-tree command.

To list the files changed in a specific commit identified by its hash (e.g., {hash}), you can use:

git diff-tree -r {hash}

The -r flag helps in recursively listing individual files within subdirectories. The raw output might contain additional information, but you can refine it to show only the file names using two additional flags:

git diff-tree —no-commit-id —name-only -r {hash}

The —no-commit-id flag helps in suppressing the commit hashes from appearing in the output.
The —name-only flag ensures that only the names of the changed files are printed, rather than their full paths or detailed diffs.

29. How can I remove a file from Git’s tracking without deleting it from the file system?

Answer: Candidates will have to prepare for this entry among more challenging Git interview questions, as it requires a specific command. While git rm <file> removes files from both the staging area and the file system (working tree), this is not always the desired behavior. If you want to stop Git from tracking a file but keep it in your local working directory, you should use the git rm —cached <file> command.

For example: git rm —cached filename.txt

After this, to ensure Git doesn’t try to track it again in the future, it’s a good practice to add the filename to your .gitignore file: echo filename.txt >> .gitignore

This addition to the .gitignore file prevents Git from re-adding it to tracking unintentionally in subsequent operations.

30. What are the key differences between rebasing and merge in Git?

Answer: As you know, understanding Git commands accounts for a major share of the latest Git interview questions. Both git rebase and git merge are commands used to integrate changes from one branch into another, but they do so in fundamentally different ways:

git merge: This command is used to take independent lines of development (branches) and integrate them into a single branch. When you merge, Git creates a new «merge commit» that has two (or more) parent commits, effectively preserving the exact history of both branches. The result is a non-linear commit history, often referred to as a «diamond» shape in the commit graph.
git rebase: The rebase command also integrates changes from one branch into another, but it does so by rewriting commit history. Instead of creating a new merge commit, rebase takes a sequence of commits from your current branch and reapplies them one by one onto the tip of another base branch. This process essentially «moves» your branch to a new base, resulting in a cleaner, straight, linear commit history.

The primary difference lies in how they handle history: merge preserves history by adding a new merge commit, while rebase rewrites history to create a linear, often tidier, history. Rewriting history with rebase can be problematic if the commits have already been pushed to a shared remote repository, as it creates divergent histories for other collaborators.

31. What is the fundamental difference between reverting and resetting in Git?

Answer: Candidates might encounter this entry among new DevOps interview questions for GitHub interviews, as it distinguishes two important ways to undo changes.

git reset: The git reset command is a powerful tool used to revert local changes to a specific state in a Git repository. It directly manipulates Git’s three trees: the commit history (HEAD), the staging area (index), and the working directory. When you reset, you are essentially moving the HEAD pointer and potentially altering your commit history. For example, git reset —hard <commit> will discard all changes in your working directory and staging area, making them match the specified commit. Because it rewrites history, git reset is generally considered a «destructive» operation and should be used with caution, especially on shared branches.
git revert: The git revert command, in contrast, creates a new commit that undoes the changes introduced by a previous commit. Instead of rewriting existing history, revert adds a new commit to the project’s history that effectively negates the effects of the chosen commit. This means the original commit remains in the history, and a new commit is added to «un-do» it. This makes git revert a «non-destructive» operation, making it safe to use on commits that have already been pushed to a shared remote repository, as it maintains a clear, linear history.

32. How can you revert a commit that has already been pushed and made publicly accessible?

Answer: For commits that have already been pushed to a shared remote repository (and thus are «open» or public), git revert is the recommended and safest approach. The git revert command helps in undoing one or multiple specific commits by creating a new commit that cancels out the changes introduced by the previous commit(s). This preserves the project’s history.

To revert the two previous commits, for example, you would use: git revert HEAD~2..HEAD

This command tells Git to revert the changes in the commits from two commits before HEAD up to (and including) HEAD. Git will then create new commits that undo those changes, adding them to your history.

33. What are the advantages of adopting a forking workflow?

Answer: Candidates might find this entry as one of the important Git interview questions, particularly for roles in open-source or highly distributed teams.

Decentralized Collaboration: The first significant advantage is that a forking workflow does not rely on a single, shared server-side repository as the «central» codebase that all developers push to directly. Instead, every developer typically gets their own personal server-side repository (their «fork»). This decentralization is common and highly effective in public open-source projects.
Isolated Development: Developers can make changes in their own fork without needing direct write access to the main project’s repository. This provides a clean isolation for their contributions.
Controlled Integration: Contributions are integrated without the direct need for pushing to one particular central repository. Instead, developers can notify the project maintainers or manager that an update is ready for integration by submitting a «pull request» (or merge request). This allows project maintainers to review, discuss, and selectively integrate contributions into the official repository, maintaining quality and control.

34. Explain the difference between git fetch and git pull.

Answer: Candidates should thoroughly prepare for this entry among DevOps interview questions for GitHub interviews, as it’s a very common point of confusion.

git fetch: This command is used to download new data (commits, branches, and tags) from a remote repository into your local repository. Importantly, git fetch only downloads the data; it does not automatically integrate or merge the downloaded data into your current working files or branch. It essentially updates your local copy of the remote’s branches, allowing you to see what changes have occurred upstream without altering your local working directory.
git pull: This command is essentially a combination of two operations: git fetch followed by git merge. When you execute git pull, it first downloads new data from the remote repository (like git fetch), and then it immediately merges that downloaded data into your current local working branch. It is ideal for quickly synchronizing your local repository with the remote, but it implicitly alters your local working files.

In summary, fetch updates your knowledge of the remote, while pull updates your local working branch.

35. What is the standard syntax for performing a rebase operation in Git?

Answer: The basic syntax for initiating a rebase operation in Git is:

git rebase [base]

Where [base] typically refers to the branch or commit onto which you want to reapply your current branch’s commits. For example, if you are on a feature branch and want to rebase it onto the main branch, you would run:

git rebase main

This command effectively rewrites the commit history of your current branch as if it were developed directly on top of the main branch.

36. What is the practical application of git bisect?

Answer: The git bisect command is an exceptionally powerful and important Git command primarily used for efficiently finding the specific commit that introduced a bug or regression in a project’s history. This command employs a binary search algorithm, making it highly effective for pinpointing the «bad» commit by iteratively dividing the commit history in half. You mark commits as «good» (where the bug didn’t exist) or «bad» (where the bug is present), and Git intelligently guides you to the problematic commit much faster than manual inspection.

37. What is the functionality of git stash drop?

Answer: git stash drop is the command used to remove a specific stashed item from the stash list, or the last added stashed item if no specific item is specified. After you have completed your work on a stashed item and no longer need it, this command helps in cleaning up the stash stack by permanently removing that particular set of stashed changes. For example, git stash drop will remove the most recent stash, while git stash drop stash@{2} will remove the stash at index 2.

38. Can you name some of the best graphical Git clients available for Linux?

Answer: Candidates might find this question commonly among Git interview questions, testing their familiarity with graphical user interfaces for Git. Some of the highly regarded graphical Git clients available for Linux include:

Git GUI: A simple, built-in graphical interface that comes with Git.
Giggle: A lightweight graphical frontend for Git.
Git Cola: A powerful and feature-rich graphical Git client.
SmartGit: A commercial, cross-platform Git client with extensive features.
qGit: A Qt-based Git graphical interface.
Git-g: The GNOME Git GUI.

39. Explain the operation of git pull origin master.

Answer: The command git pull origin master performs two primary actions:

Fetch from origin: It first executes a git fetch operation, which downloads all new commits, branches, and tags from the master branch (or the default branch named master) of the remote repository named origin. origin is the default name given to the remote repository from which you originally cloned.
Merge into current branch: After fetching, it then performs a git merge operation, integrating those newly fetched commits from origin/master into your currently checked-out local branch. So, if you are on your local main or develop branch, git pull origin master would merge origin/master into your local main or develop branch.

Essentially, it’s a convenient way to update your current local branch with the latest changes from a specific remote branch.

40. What benefits do Source Code Management (SCM) tools, particularly with Git, offer?

Answer: Users can avail exceptional benefits by utilizing Source Code Management (SCM) tools, especially when integrated with Git, which itself is a powerful SCM. Compared to older SCMs like CVS, Subversion, ClearCase, or Perforce, Git offers distinct advantages:

Convenient Staging Area: Git’s unique staging area (or index) provides a flexible and powerful way to craft commits. Developers can selectively choose which changes to include in their next commit, allowing for more granular and logical commit units.
Multiple Workflow Support: Git inherently supports and encourages diverse development workflows, such as Gitflow, Feature Branching, Forking Workflow, and Centralized Workflow. This adaptability caters to various team sizes and project complexities.
Cost-Effective Local Branching: Git’s distributed nature makes creating, merging, and deleting local branches incredibly fast and lightweight. This encourages developers to use branches extensively for isolating work, leading to cleaner code and better collaboration.
Offline Work Capability: Because every developer has a full clone of the repository history, they can commit, branch, and perform many Git operations entirely offline, which is a significant advantage over centralized SCMs.
Data Integrity: Git uses cryptographic hashing (SHA-1) to ensure the integrity of its history. Every commit, branch, and tag is checksummed, making it virtually impossible to alter the history without Git detecting it.
Speed: Git is designed for performance, often outperforming centralized SCMs for many common operations due to its local repository model.

These features collectively validate the significant benefits of modern SCM tools powered by Git, making them indispensable for contemporary software development.

Advanced Level Git Interview Questions

As an experienced Git professional, you can anticipate encountering advanced-level Git interview questions during your interview. This section will delve into a few such questions, helping you to thoroughly prepare for your interview.

41. Outline the process for squashing the last N commits into a single commit.

Answer: This entry is one of the advanced Git interview questions with two distinct approaches depending on your desired outcome regarding the commit message. Squashing commits means combining multiple commits into a single, cohesive commit.

Scenario 1: Writing a completely new commit message from scratch:

You can utilize the following sequence of commands. First, reset the branch pointer (HEAD) back N commits, but keep the changes in your staging area (soft reset). Then, create a new commit with a fresh message:

Bash

git reset —soft HEAD~N && git commit

After running git commit, an editor will open where you can write your new, consolidated commit message.

Scenario 2: Editing a new commit message by combining existing commit messages:

If you wish to concatenate the messages from the original N commits into your new, squashed commit message, you need to extract those messages and pass them to git commit. The following command helps in achieving this advanced function:

Bash

git reset —soft HEAD~N && git commit —edit -m»$(git log —format=%B —reverse HEAD@{N}..HEAD)»

Let’s break down the second part:

git log —format=%B —reverse HEAD@{N}..HEAD: This command fetches the commit messages (%B for full body) in reverse order (oldest first) for the range of commits from N commits ago up to the current HEAD.
The $(…) syntax captures the output of this git log command.
git commit —edit -m»<message>»: This command creates a new commit with the specified message, and the —edit flag opens the editor to allow you to further refine or combine the messages.

This method is particularly useful for presenting a cleaner, more understandable history, especially before pushing changes to a remote repository.

42. How should I configure a Git repository to run code sanity checking tools prior to commits?

Answer: Sanity checking helps in determining the possibility and feasibility of continuous testing or ensuring code quality before integration. This can be achieved by utilizing Git’s «hooks» mechanism, specifically the pre-commit hook.

A sanity test can be implemented through a simple script (often a shell script) placed in the .git/hooks/pre-commit file within your repository. This script will automatically execute before each commit. The script’s purpose is to run various code quality tools, such as linters, formatters, or custom sanity checks, against the changes that are being committed.

Here is an illustrative example of a pre-commit script written for Go files:

#!/bin/sh

# Get a list of staged .go files that are added, copied, or modified

files=$(git diff —cached —name-only —diff-filter=ACM | grep ‘.go$’)

# If no Go files are staged, exit successfully

if [ -z «$files» ]; then

exit 0

# Check if any of the staged Go files are not properly formatted

unfmtd=$(gofmt -l $files)

# If all files are formatted, exit successfully

if [ -z «$unfmtd» ]; then

exit 0

# If unformatted files are found, print an error and prevent the commit

echo «Some .go files are not fmt’d. Please run ‘gofmt -w .’ before committing.»

echo «$unfmtd»

Explanation of the script:

#!/bin/sh: Specifies the interpreter for the script.
git diff —cached —name-only —diff-filter=ACM | grep ‘.go$’: This command pipeline finds all .go files that are currently staged for commit and are either Added, Copied, or Modified.
if [ -z «$files» ]; then exit 0; fi: If no Go files are staged, the script exits successfully, allowing the commit to proceed.
unfmtd=$(gofmt -l $files): This runs the gofmt tool (a standard Go source code formatter) in «list» mode (-l) against the staged Go files. It will output the names of files that are not properly formatted.
if [ -z «$unfmtd» ]; then exit 0; fi: If gofmt -l outputs nothing (meaning all files are formatted), the script exits successfully.
echo …; exit 1: If gofmt -l finds unformatted files, it prints an error message and exits with a non-zero status code (exit 1). This non-zero exit status is crucial, as it signals to Git that the pre-commit hook has failed, thereby preventing the commit from being applied to the repository.

This mechanism ensures that certain code quality standards are met before changes are recorded in the repository’s history.

43. What is the function of git reflog?

Answer: The git reflog command is a powerful utility in Git that helps in tracking all the changes made to the references (like branches, HEAD, tags) within a repository, specifically on your local machine. It maintains a log history of where your HEAD and other branch pointers have been in your local repository. This log is local to your repository and is not shared with others. It’s incredibly useful for recovering lost commits or branches, or for backtracking to a previous state, even if those states are no longer directly pointed to by a branch or tag. For instance, if you accidentally reset your branch, git reflog can show you the previous HEAD position, allowing you to restore it.

44. How can I cherry-pick a merge commit?

Answer: Candidates frequently encounter this entry among advanced Git interview questions, as cherry-picking merge commits has a specific requirement. The git cherry-pick command fundamentally works by taking a diff (the changes) from a single commit and reapplying it. A merge commit, by its definition, has two or more parent commits (one from each branch that was merged). When you cherry-pick a merge commit, Git needs to know which parent’s changes to consider as the «mainline» and which changes represent the actual new work introduced by the merge.

Therefore, to cherry-pick a merge commit (e.g., with hash 64cv89d), you must specify the -m flag (for «mainline») followed by the number of the parent that represents the mainline history you want to keep. Parent 1 is typically the branch you were on when you performed the merge.

For example, if 64cv89d is a merge commit where parent 1 is your release-branch (the target of the merge), and you want to cherry-pick the changes that 64cv89d brought into that branch, you would first check out your target branch (if not already there) and then execute:

git checkout release-branch

git cherry-pick -m 1 64cv89d

Choosing the correct parent number is crucial, as picking the wrong one will result in a different set of changes being applied.

45. What is the method for copying a commit from one branch to another?

Answer: The git cherry-pick command is precisely the best option for this scenario. It provides the feasibility of taking an existing commit from one branch and applying its changes to another branch or location within the same repository.

To copy a commit (e.g., with hash {hash_of_that_commit}) from its original branch to a target branch:

Switch to the target branch: First, navigate to the branch where you want to apply the commit: git checkout <target_branch_name>
Apply the commit: Then, call the git cherry-pick command with the hash of the commit you wish to copy: git cherry-pick {hash_of_that_commit}

As a result, a new commit will be created on your <target_branch_name>. This new commit will have a new hash because, although its content changes are identical to the original commit, it has a different parent history and therefore a different unique identifier. This makes cherry-pick ideal for selectively porting individual changes without merging entire branch histories.

46. What steps should be taken if a teammate inadvertently deleted a branch and pushed the changes to the central Git repository, and I need to recover the branch?

Answer: This is a critical advanced Git recovery scenario. The key to recovering a deleted branch that has been pushed (meaning its deletion was reflected on the remote) lies in Git’s reflog (reference log). The reflog tracks all the local updates to the tips of branches and other references in your repository, even if those references no longer exist.

Here’s the process:

Inspect the reflog: The first step is to review your reflog to find the commit hash that the deleted branch last pointed to before it was deleted. git reflog
Look for an entry that indicates the branch was moved or deleted. For example, you might see an entry like HEAD@{5}: branch: deleted (was origin/feature-branch). The was part will show the last commit the branch pointed to. Or, you might see HEAD@{N}: checkout: moving from <some-branch> to <deleted-branch-name> and then a subsequent HEAD@{N+1}: branch: deleted. You need to find the commit SHA before the deletion.
Create a new branch from that commit: Once you identify the commit hash (let’s say abcdef123), you can recreate the branch from that specific point in history: git branch <recovered-branch-name> abcdef123
Check out the new branch: git checkout <recovered-branch-name>
Push the recovered branch (if necessary): If you want to restore this branch on the central repository, you will then push it: git push origin <recovered-branch-name>

This leverages the reflog as a safety net for local operations. If the branch was only deleted remotely and you haven’t pulled that deletion, you might simply be able to git push origin <branch-name> from someone’s local copy that still has it. However, reflog is the most reliable recovery method for local deletions.

47. Describe the Gitflow workflow.

Answer: Candidates could find this question among the most difficult Git interview questions, as it requires a detailed understanding of a specific, structured branching model. The Gitflow workflow is a highly structured branching model that leverages two long-running parallel branches as its core: master (or main) and develop. It also defines specific branches for features, releases, and hotfixes.

The key components and their purposes in the Gitflow workflow are as follows:

master Branch (or main): This is the main branch where the production-ready code resides. Everything in the master branch is always considered stable and ready for live release. Commits to this branch typically only come from merges of release or hotfix branches.
develop Branch: This branch serves as the integration branch for all ongoing development. All new feature branches are created from develop, and new features are merged back into develop. It represents the latest development changes, which are generally stable but not yet ready for production.
Feature Branches: These are short-lived branches created from develop for developing new features. Each new feature gets its own unique branch. Once a feature is complete and thoroughly tested, its feature branch is merged back into the develop branch and then deleted. They are isolated workspaces for new functionality.
Release Branches: When the develop branch has accumulated sufficient features for an upcoming release, a release branch is created from develop. This branch is used for final testing, bug fixes specific to that release, and preparing for the actual production rollout. Only critical bug fixes are allowed on this branch. Once stable, the release branch is merged into master (and tagged) and also back into develop (to ensure bug fixes are propagated).
Hotfix Branches: These are short-lived branches used to quickly address critical bugs that are found in the master (production) branch. They are created directly from master, and once the bug is fixed, they are merged back into both master (and tagged) and develop (to ensure the fix is in the next planned release).

Gitflow provides a robust and predictable framework for managing complex release cycles in team environments.

48. How does git remote differ from git clone?

Answer: This question clarifies the distinction between two fundamental Git commands related to remote repositories.

git remote: This command is used to manage the remote repositories that your local repository is aware of. It primarily helps in creating, viewing, and deleting entries in your local Git configuration that associate a specific name (e.g., origin) with a specific URL of a remote repository. It does not download or copy any code; it merely establishes a reference. For example, git remote add origin https://github.com/user/repo.git adds a new remote named origin.
git clone: This command is used to create an entirely new Git repository (a local copy) by copying an existing repository from a specified URL. When you clone, Git downloads the entire project history, all branches, and sets up a default remote named origin pointing back to the original repository. It’s the primary way to get a working copy of an existing Git project.

In essence, git remote manages pointers to remote repositories, while git clone creates a full local copy of a remote repository.

49. What is the command used for fixing a broken commit message?

Answer: For fixing a broken or incorrect commit message for the most recent commit (and assuming it hasn’t been pushed to a shared remote yet), you can use the command:

git commit —amend

When you run this command, Git will open your default text editor (e.g., Vim, Nano) with the previous commit message pre-populated. You can then edit the message, save the file, and exit the editor. This will overwrite the previous commit, replacing its message with the new one. Crucially, it also changes the commit’s SHA-1 hash, so it should only be used for local, unpushed commits.

50. Describe the general branching pattern commonly observed in Git.

Answer: The most general and widely adopted branching pattern in Git, especially for collaborative projects, involves a central «Main» branch (often named master or main) that serves as the stable, deployable version of the codebase. Alongside this, developers typically create other, isolated branches for implementing new features, fixing bugs, or experimenting with new ideas.

The general pattern is:

main (or master) Branch: This is the primary branch, considered the single source of truth for the project’s stable, production-ready code. It usually reflects the latest released version.
Feature Branches: For every new feature, improvement, or bug fix, a new branch is created from the main (or a develop if using Gitflow) branch. Developers work on their specific task in isolation on this feature branch.
Merge Back: Once the feature is complete and thoroughly tested, the feature branch is merged back into the main (or develop) branch, and the feature branch is typically deleted.

This pattern is highly effective in scenarios where multiple developers are working concurrently on a single project, as it prevents direct interference with the stable codebase, isolates ongoing development, and facilitates code reviews before integration. This promotes a clean, manageable, and collaborative development process.

Concluding Remarks

Upon reviewing the comprehensive list of Git interview questions provided, it becomes unequivocally clear that mastering Git is a multifaceted and indeed challenging endeavor. Therefore, it is paramount that you proactively identify and leverage competent and highly promising sources of study materials and rigorous training resources dedicated to Git. The burgeoning popularity of Git as an indispensable tool within the broader DevOps landscape commands considerable attention, highlighting its critical role in modern software development. Consequently, you should not underestimate the potential benefits that a specialized Git fundamentals course can confer upon your professional trajectory.

Most importantly, maintain an unwavering focus on your ultimate career objectives within the dynamic realm of application and software development. A well-structured Git fundamentals training course can serve as an invaluable companion in your journey towards achieving sustained professional success and excellence.

A Comprehensive Guide to Acing Git Interview Questions

Related posts: