Microsoft AZ-801 Configuring Windows Server Hybrid Advanced Services Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set2 Q16-30
Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-801 exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 16:
Your company wants to implement Azure Automation Hybrid Runbook Workers on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which authentication method is required for the Hybrid Runbook Worker?
A) Service Principal
B) Managed Identity
C) Certificate-based authentication
D) Shared Access Signature
Answer: B
Explanation:
Managed Identity is the correct answer because Azure Arc-enabled servers support system-assigned managed identities that provide secure authentication for Azure Automation Hybrid Runbook Workers without requiring credential management. When a managed identity is enabled on an Arc-enabled server, Azure automatically manages the identity lifecycle, including credential rotation, eliminating the need to store and manage authentication secrets. The Hybrid Runbook Worker extension leverages this managed identity to authenticate with Azure Automation and execute runbooks securely. This approach follows security best practices by removing the need to handle credentials directly and provides seamless integration with Azure services.
service principals can be used for authentication in Azure, they are not the recommended or required authentication method for Hybrid Runbook Workers on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Service principals require manual credential management, including client secrets or certificates that must be periodically rotated and securely stored. Using service principals introduces additional administrative overhead and security risks compared to managed identities. Azure Arc-enabled servers with Hybrid Runbook Worker extension are designed to use managed identities, which provide superior security and simplified credential management without requiring service principal configuration.
certificate-based authentication, while secure, is not the required or primary authentication method for Hybrid Runbook Workers on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Certificate authentication would require deploying, managing, and renewing certificates across multiple servers, introducing complexity and administrative burden. Although certificates can be used in some Azure authentication scenarios, the Hybrid Runbook Worker solution is designed to leverage managed identities for streamlined authentication. Managed identities eliminate certificate management overhead and provide automatic credential rotation, making them the preferred and required authentication method for this scenario.
Shared Access Signatures are primarily used for delegating access to Azure Storage resources with specific permissions and time-limited validity. SAS tokens are designed for storage access scenarios and are not applicable to authenticating Hybrid Runbook Workers with Azure Automation. Hybrid Runbook Workers require authentication mechanisms that work with Azure Resource Manager and Azure Automation services, not storage-specific access tokens. Managed identities provide the appropriate authentication framework for Hybrid Runbook Workers, offering secure and automatic credential management tailored to Azure service integration.
Question 17:
You need to configure Azure Sentinel to collect security logs from Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which data connector should you configure?
A) Azure Activity connector
B) Windows Security Events connector
C) Azure Diagnostics connector
D) Office 365 connector
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Windows Security Events connector is the correct answer because it is specifically designed to collect security event logs from Windows servers, including Azure Arc-enabled servers, and ingest them into Azure Sentinel for security monitoring and analysis. This connector leverages the Log Analytics agent or Azure Monitor agent deployed on Arc-enabled servers to collect Windows Security events such as logon attempts, account management activities, privilege usage, and other security-relevant events. Once configured, the connector streams security logs to the Log Analytics workspace associated with Azure Sentinel, enabling security analysts to detect threats, investigate incidents, and respond to security events across hybrid infrastructure using Sentinel’s advanced analytics and threat intelligence capabilities.
the Azure Activity connector collects Azure control plane logs that record management operations performed on Azure resources, such as resource creation, deletion, or configuration changes. Activity logs provide audit trails for administrative actions but do not contain security events from operating systems running on servers. While Activity logs are valuable for tracking who made changes to Azure resources, they do not provide visibility into security events occurring within the operating system of Arc-enabled servers, such as authentication attempts or file access. For OS-level security monitoring, the Windows Security Events connector is required.
the Azure Diagnostics connector is designed to collect diagnostic logs and metrics from Azure platform services rather than from the operating systems of individual servers. Diagnostics data typically includes resource-level performance metrics and service-specific logs from Azure resources like storage accounts, databases, or networking components. This connector does not provide access to Windows Security event logs or other OS-level security information from Arc-enabled servers. For comprehensive security monitoring requiring detailed event logs from Windows servers, the Windows Security Events connector offers the appropriate functionality.
the Office 365 connector is specifically designed to ingest audit logs and activity data from Office 365 services such as Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, and Microsoft Teams. This connector provides visibility into user activities within Office 365 applications, including file access, email activities, and administrative actions. However, Office 365 logs are completely separate from server security events and do not provide information about operating system activities on Azure Arc-enabled servers. For collecting security logs from Windows servers, the Windows Security Events connector is the dedicated solution.
Question 18:
Your organization needs to implement network segmentation for Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which Azure networking feature should you configure?
A) Network Security Groups
B) Azure ExpressRoute
C) Azure Virtual WAN
D) Azure Peering
Answer: A
Explanation:
Network Security Groups are the correct answer because NSGs provide network-level access control for Azure resources by defining inbound and outbound traffic rules based on source and destination IP addresses, ports, and protocols. While Azure Arc-enabled servers are on-premises or in other clouds, they can still benefit from NSG-like protection when connecting to Azure services or when implemented through Azure networking integration. For true network segmentation of Arc-enabled servers, organizations typically implement NSG principles through on-premises firewalls or software-defined networking, while NSGs control access to Azure resources that Arc-enabled servers communicate with. NSGs enable micro-segmentation by allowing administrators to define granular security rules that permit only necessary traffic between resources and server groups.
Azure ExpressRoute is a service that provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises infrastructure and Azure datacenters, bypassing the public internet for enhanced reliability and security. While ExpressRoute improves network performance and security for hybrid connectivity, it is a connectivity solution rather than a network segmentation tool. ExpressRoute establishes the network path between environments but does not provide the granular traffic filtering and access control rules necessary for network segmentation. Organizations still need security controls like NSGs or firewalls in addition to ExpressRoute to implement proper network segmentation.
Azure Virtual WAN is a networking service that provides optimized and automated branch connectivity to and through Azure, creating a hub-and-spoke network architecture. Virtual WAN simplifies large-scale network connectivity and integrates with SD-WAN solutions for branch offices. While Virtual WAN offers network routing and connectivity benefits, it focuses on connectivity topology and traffic routing rather than network segmentation through access control rules. Network segmentation requires granular security policies that restrict traffic between resources based on security requirements, which Virtual WAN does not directly provide.
Azure Peering refers to network connections between Azure virtual networks, regions, or between Azure and other networks. Peering enables network connectivity and route sharing but does not implement network segmentation or access control. While peering is important for establishing network connectivity in hybrid and multi-region architectures, it does not provide the security filtering necessary for network segmentation. Peering establishes that networks can communicate, but organizations must implement additional security controls like NSGs, firewalls, or access control lists to segment traffic and restrict access according to security policies.
Question 19:
You are implementing Azure Monitor workbooks for Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which component provides the underlying data for workbook visualizations?
A) Azure Data Factory
B) Log Analytics workspace
C) Azure Synapse Analytics
D) Azure Data Explorer
Answer: B
Explanation:
A Log Analytics workspace is the correct answer because it serves as the central data repository for Azure Monitor, storing logs, metrics, and telemetry data that Azure Monitor workbooks query and visualize. Workbooks use Kusto Query Language to retrieve data from Log Analytics workspaces, enabling interactive reports and dashboards that display performance metrics, security events, and operational data from Azure Arc-enabled servers. The workspace collects data through various agents including the Azure Monitor agent and Log Analytics agent, aggregating information from multiple sources into a single queryable database. Workbooks leverage this comprehensive data to create dynamic visualizations, charts, and reports that help administrators understand system health, performance trends, and security posture across hybrid infrastructure.
Azure Data Factory is an ETL and data integration service designed for orchestrating and automating data movement and transformation at scale. Data Factory excels at moving data between various sources and destinations, transforming data through data flows, and scheduling complex data pipelines. However, it is not designed as a data source for Azure Monitor workbooks. Data Factory focuses on batch data processing and integration scenarios rather than real-time monitoring and telemetry collection. Workbooks require live monitoring data stored in Log Analytics workspaces, not batch-processed data from Data Factory pipelines.
Azure Synapse Analytics is an analytics service that combines data warehousing and big data analytics for large-scale data analysis and reporting. Synapse is optimized for complex analytical queries across massive datasets using dedicated SQL pools and Spark pools. While powerful for data warehousing scenarios, Synapse is not integrated as a data source for Azure Monitor workbooks monitoring Arc-enabled servers. Monitoring and operational telemetry data flows through Log Analytics workspaces, which are specifically designed for log ingestion, search, and analysis at the scale required for infrastructure monitoring.
Azure Data Explorer is a fast and highly scalable data exploration service optimized for log and telemetry data analysis, it is not the standard underlying data source for Azure Monitor workbooks. Azure Data Explorer uses Kusto Query Language, which is also used by Log Analytics, but Azure Monitor workbooks are designed to query Log Analytics workspaces for monitoring data from Azure resources and Arc-enabled servers. Although Data Explorer can handle similar data types, the Azure Monitor ecosystem uses Log Analytics workspaces as the integrated data store for operational telemetry and monitoring information.
Question 20:
Your company requires approval workflows before deploying updates to production Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which Azure service should you implement?
A) Azure Logic Apps
B) Azure Functions
C) Azure Event Hubs
D) Azure Notification Hubs
Answer: A
Explanation:
Azure Logic Apps is the correct answer because it provides a low-code workflow automation platform that can implement approval processes and integrate with Azure Automation Update Management. Logic Apps can orchestrate complex workflows that include sending approval requests via email or Microsoft Teams, waiting for responses from designated approvers, and then triggering update deployments to Azure Arc-enabled servers based on approval decisions. The visual designer in Logic Apps makes it easy to create workflows that connect Azure Automation with approval systems, notification services, and ticketing systems. Logic Apps supports conditional logic, parallel approvals, timeout handling, and integration with hundreds of connectors, making it ideal for implementing governance and approval workflows around update management.
Azure Functions can execute code in response to events and integrate with various Azure services, it is primarily designed for implementing custom business logic and microservices rather than orchestrating workflow processes with human approval steps. Functions excel at event-driven computation and API implementation but lack built-in workflow orchestration features like approval routing, timeout management, and visual workflow design. Implementing approval workflows with Functions would require significant custom development including state management, notification handling, and approval tracking, whereas Logic Apps provides these capabilities out-of-the-box through pre-built connectors and workflow actions.
Azure Event Hubs is a big data streaming platform and event ingestion service designed to receive and process millions of events per second. Event Hubs focuses on real-time data streaming scenarios like telemetry ingestion, log aggregation, and clickstream analysis. It does not provide workflow orchestration or approval management capabilities. While Event Hubs could potentially receive events related to update requests, it cannot implement the approval logic, human interaction, and conditional deployment triggering required for update approval workflows. Event Hubs is a data streaming service, not a workflow automation or approval management platform.
Azure Notification Hubs is a push notification service designed to send notifications to mobile devices at scale across different platforms like iOS, Android, and Windows. Notification Hubs specializes in broadcasting messages to mobile applications but does not provide workflow orchestration or approval management functionality. While Notification Hubs could potentially send notifications about pending approvals to mobile devices, it cannot handle the approval workflow logic, collect approval responses, or trigger subsequent actions based on decisions. For implementing complete approval workflows including notification, response collection, and conditional action execution, Logic Apps provides comprehensive workflow automation capabilities.
Question 21:
You need to configure custom log collection from Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which Azure Monitor feature enables this capability?
A) Application Insights
B) Data Collection Rules
C) Metrics Explorer
D) Activity Log
Answer: B
Explanation:
Data Collection Rules are the correct answer because they provide a flexible and centralized way to configure what data should be collected from Azure Arc-enabled servers and where it should be sent. DCRs define data sources such as performance counters, Windows event logs, syslog, and custom text logs, along with transformations and destinations for the collected data. When using the Azure Monitor agent on Arc-enabled servers, DCRs control all aspects of data collection including which log files to monitor, how frequently to collect data, and which Log Analytics workspaces should receive the information. This modern approach to data collection provides granular control and can be centrally managed through Azure portal, ARM templates, or APIs.
Application Insights is specifically designed for application performance monitoring and telemetry for web applications and services. While Application Insights provides deep visibility into application behavior, request rates, response times, and dependencies, it focuses on application-level telemetry rather than custom log collection from servers. Application Insights requires instrumentation of applications through SDKs or agents that understand application frameworks. For collecting custom logs from operating systems or applications on Azure Arc-enabled servers, Data Collection Rules with Azure Monitor agent provide the appropriate infrastructure-level log collection capabilities.
Metrics Explorer is a visualization and analysis tool within Azure Monitor that allows you to chart and analyze metric data from Azure resources. Metrics Explorer enables interactive exploration of time-series metrics through graphical representations but does not configure or control data collection. It is a read-only analytical interface that consumes metric data already being collected. Metrics Explorer cannot specify custom logs to collect or configure collection parameters. For defining what data should be collected from Arc-enabled servers, including custom logs, Data Collection Rules provide the necessary configuration framework.
the Activity Log records subscription-level management operations and events across Azure resources, such as resource creation, deletion, or configuration changes. Activity Log provides audit trails for control plane activities but does not collect custom logs or data from within servers. Activity Log is automatically generated by Azure Resource Manager for management operations and cannot be configured to collect custom application or system logs from Arc-enabled servers. For custom log collection requiring agent-based data gathering from servers, Data Collection Rules with Azure Monitor agent offer the appropriate functionality.
Question 22:
Your organization wants to use Azure Lighthouse to manage Azure Arc-enabled servers across multiple customer tenants. Which role assignment enables service provider access?
A) Reader
B) Contributor
C) Owner
D) Delegated resource management roles
Answer: D
Explanation:
Delegated resource management roles are the correct answer because Azure Lighthouse uses Azure delegated resource management to enable service providers to access and manage resources across multiple customer Azure AD tenants. When implementing Azure Lighthouse, customers authorize specific Azure AD users, groups, or service principals from the service provider’s tenant with specific role assignments on their resources, including Azure Arc-enabled servers. These delegated permissions allow service providers to manage customer resources without requiring guest accounts in customer tenants. The delegation can be scoped to specific subscriptions or resource groups and can include built-in roles like Contributor, Managed Services Registration Assignment Delete Role, or custom roles, providing flexible and granular access control.
Reader is a specific built-in role that provides read-only access to resources but does not represent the mechanism by which Azure Lighthouse enables cross-tenant management. While Reader role might be included as one of the delegated permissions in a Lighthouse authorization, simply having Reader role does not enable the cross-tenant access architecture that Lighthouse provides. Azure Lighthouse requires proper delegation configuration with Azure delegated resource management, which can include Reader or other roles as part of the authorization. The question asks about what enables service provider access generally, which is the delegated resource management framework rather than any single role.
Contributor, while commonly used in Azure Lighthouse delegations for managing resources, is just one possible role that can be delegated. The enabling mechanism for Azure Lighthouse is the delegated resource management architecture that allows cross-tenant access, not the Contributor role itself. Service providers might receive Contributor, Reader, or other roles depending on the customer’s requirements. Azure Lighthouse can delegate various role combinations, and Contributor alone does not represent the comprehensive answer about what enables service provider access across customer tenants. The delegated resource management framework is what fundamentally enables Lighthouse functionality.
Owner role, while powerful and capable of full resource management including access control, is typically not recommended for Azure Lighthouse delegations due to security considerations. More importantly, like Contributor and Reader, Owner is just one possible role that could be delegated. The mechanism that enables service providers to access and manage resources across customer tenants is the Azure delegated resource management architecture, not any specific role assignment. Azure Lighthouse works through establishing delegated permissions with appropriate role assignments, and the framework itself is what enables cross-tenant management capabilities regardless of which specific roles are assigned.
Question 23:
You are implementing Azure Key Vault integration with Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which extension enables this integration?
A) Key Vault VM extension
B) Custom Script extension
C) Azure Monitor extension
D) Diagnostics extension
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Key Vault VM extension is the correct answer because it specifically enables Azure Arc-enabled servers to retrieve secrets, certificates, and keys from Azure Key Vault automatically. This extension monitors specified Key Vault items and automatically downloads them to the server whenever they are updated, ensuring that applications always have access to current certificates and secrets. The extension can observe multiple certificates and secrets simultaneously, downloading them to specified locations on the server file system. This capability is particularly valuable for certificate lifecycle management, allowing automated certificate rotation without application downtime. The Key Vault extension works seamlessly with both Azure VMs and Azure Arc-enabled servers, providing consistent secret management across hybrid environments.
the Custom Script extension is designed to download and execute scripts on virtual machines, typically used for post-deployment configuration or automation tasks. While Custom Script extension could theoretically be used to retrieve secrets from Key Vault through scripting, this would require manual scripting efforts and would not provide the automated monitoring and synchronization capabilities that the Key Vault extension offers. Custom Script extension executes scripts on-demand or during deployment but does not continuously monitor Key Vault for updates or automatically refresh secrets. For integrated and automatic Key Vault secret management, the dedicated Key Vault extension provides superior functionality.
the Azure Monitor extension is focused on collecting telemetry data including performance metrics, logs, and events from servers for monitoring and analysis purposes. While the Azure Monitor extension is crucial for observability and monitoring, it does not provide capabilities for retrieving secrets or certificates from Azure Key Vault. The Monitor extension sends data from servers to Azure Monitor services rather than retrieving configuration or secrets from Azure services. For Key Vault integration requiring secret retrieval and certificate management, the Key Vault extension is specifically designed for this purpose.
the Diagnostics extension is used to collect diagnostic data such as performance counters, event logs, and crash dumps from servers, primarily for troubleshooting and monitoring purposes. Like the Azure Monitor extension, the Diagnostics extension focuses on data collection and transmission to storage or monitoring services rather than retrieving secrets from Key Vault. The Diagnostics extension sends information from the server to Azure rather than retrieving configuration or secrets. For automated retrieval and updating of secrets and certificates from Azure Key Vault, the dedicated Key Vault VM extension provides the required functionality.
Question 24:
Your company needs to enforce compliance policies on Azure Arc-enabled servers using Azure Policy. Which policy effect prevents non-compliant resources from being created?
A) Audit
B) Deny
C) Append
D) Modify
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Deny policy effect is the correct answer because it actively prevents the creation or modification of resources that do not comply with the defined policy rules. When a Deny policy is applied, any attempts to create or update resources in ways that violate the policy are blocked immediately, returning an error message explaining why the operation was denied. This preventive approach ensures that non-compliant configurations never exist in the environment in the first place. For Azure Arc-enabled servers, Deny policies can prevent configurations such as disabling required extensions, removing required tags, or changing security settings that would make servers non-compliant. Deny provides strong governance by enforcing compliance at the point of configuration change.
the Audit policy effect only identifies and reports on non-compliant resources without preventing their creation or modification. When Audit policies are applied, Azure Policy evaluates resources for compliance and generates compliance reports that administrators can review. Non-compliant resources are flagged in compliance dashboards, but the Audit effect takes no action to prevent or remediate non-compliance. While Audit is valuable for visibility and identifying compliance gaps, it does not enforce compliance or prevent non-compliant resources from being created. Organizations seeking to prevent non-compliant configurations must use the Deny effect rather than just auditing violations.
the Append policy effect automatically adds specified fields or tags to resources during creation or update operations. Append is useful for enforcing standard configurations like automatically adding required tags or setting default values, but it does not prevent resource creation when compliance cannot be achieved through appending values. Append works by augmenting resource definitions rather than blocking operations. While Append can help achieve compliance by adding missing required properties, it cannot prevent fundamentally non-compliant configurations. For preventing non-compliant resources from being created, the Deny effect provides the necessary blocking capability.
the Modify policy effect is designed to add, update, or remove properties and tags on resources during creation or update operations, similar to Append but more flexible. Modify can change existing resource properties to bring them into compliance, but like Append, it does not prevent resource creation. Modify attempts to remediate non-compliance by changing resource configurations, but if compliance cannot be achieved through modification, the resource creation still proceeds. For truly preventing non-compliant resources from being created when compliance cannot be automatically achieved, the Deny effect provides the necessary enforcement mechanism.
Question 25:
You need to configure Azure Automation to manage certificates on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which Automation asset type stores certificates?
A) Variables
B) Credentials
C) Certificates
D) Connections
Answer: C
Explanation:
Certificates is the correct answer because Azure Automation provides a dedicated asset type specifically for storing and managing certificates that can be used in runbooks and DSC configurations. The Certificates asset securely stores X.509 certificates in Azure Automation, making them available to automation workflows running on Hybrid Runbook Workers on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Runbooks can retrieve certificates from the Certificates store using cmdlets and use them for various purposes including authentication, encryption, or deployment to managed servers. The certificates are stored encrypted in Azure Automation and can be accessed programmatically within runbooks while maintaining security. This centralized certificate management simplifies certificate lifecycle management across hybrid infrastructure.
Variables in Azure Automation are designed to store simple data values like strings, integers, or booleans that can be accessed by multiple runbooks. While Variables provide a way to store reusable configuration data, they are not designed for securely storing certificates or complex cryptographic objects. Variables are typically used for storing configuration settings, thresholds, or other simple values that runbooks need to access. Certificates require specialized secure storage with proper encryption and access controls, which the Variables asset type does not provide. For certificate storage, the dedicated Certificates asset type offers appropriate security and functionality.
Credentials assets in Azure Automation are specifically designed to store username and password combinations for authentication purposes. While Credentials provide secure storage for username-password pairs, they are not intended for storing certificates. Credentials use PSCredential objects and are typically used for authenticating to systems or services that require traditional username and password authentication. Certificates represent a different authentication mechanism using public-key cryptography and require different storage and handling. For certificate-based authentication and management, the Certificates asset type provides the appropriate functionality rather than username-password Credentials.
Connections assets in Azure Automation store connection information for connecting to external services or resources, typically including multiple properties like service endpoints, subscription IDs, and authentication details bundled together. Connections provide a convenient way to package all information needed to connect to a service in a single reusable asset. While a Connection might include references to certificates or credential assets as part of its configuration, it is not designed as the primary storage location for certificates themselves. For directly storing and managing certificates, the dedicated Certificates asset type offers specialized functionality and security appropriate for cryptographic objects.
Question 26:
You are configuring Azure Monitor for Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which agent collects performance and log data from servers?
A) Dependency agent
B) Azure Monitor agent
C) Network Performance Monitor agent
D) Application Insights agent
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Azure Monitor agent is the correct answer because it represents the modern unified data collection agent designed to gather performance metrics, event logs, and other telemetry from both Azure virtual machines and Azure Arc-enabled servers. This agent replaces older monitoring solutions like the Log Analytics agent and provides enhanced capabilities including support for data collection rules that enable centralized configuration management. The Azure Monitor agent can collect Windows event logs, performance counters, syslog messages, and custom logs, sending all collected data to Log Analytics workspaces for analysis and alerting. It supports multiple destinations and provides better performance and reliability compared to legacy agents.
the Dependency agent is specialized for service mapping and application dependency visualization rather than general performance and log data collection. The Dependency agent works alongside the Azure Monitor agent to discover network connections and dependencies between servers and applications, creating visual maps of application architecture. While valuable for understanding application topology and dependencies, it does not collect standard performance metrics or event logs. The Dependency agent focuses specifically on network traffic analysis and process-level connection tracking to build dependency maps in Azure Monitor.
the Network Performance Monitor agent is designed specifically for monitoring network performance metrics such as latency, packet loss, and network connectivity between endpoints. NPM provides detailed network performance insights and can monitor ExpressRoute connections, service connectivity, and network paths. However, it does not collect general server performance metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, or event logs. NPM serves a specialized network monitoring purpose and cannot replace the comprehensive data collection capabilities that the Azure Monitor agent provides for server monitoring.
Application Insights agent is focused on application performance monitoring for web applications and services rather than infrastructure monitoring. Application Insights collects application-level telemetry including request rates, response times, dependency tracking, and exception details. It requires application instrumentation through SDKs or agent-based auto-instrumentation for supported frameworks. Application Insights does not collect operating system performance counters or event logs from servers. For infrastructure-level monitoring of Azure Arc-enabled servers, the Azure Monitor agent provides the necessary data collection capabilities.
Question 27:
Your organization needs to implement Azure Automation Start Stop VMs solution for Arc-enabled servers during off-peak hours. Which component schedules the automation?
A) Azure Logic Apps
B) Azure Automation schedules
C) Azure Functions timer triggers
D) Azure Event Grid subscriptions
Answer: B
Explanation:
Azure Automation schedules are the correct answer because they provide native scheduling capabilities within Azure Automation for triggering runbooks at specified times or on recurring intervals. Automation schedules allow administrators to define when runbooks should execute, supporting one-time executions or recurring patterns such as daily, weekly, or monthly schedules. For Start Stop VM solutions, schedules can be configured to trigger runbooks that start servers at the beginning of business hours and stop them during off-peak periods, optimizing costs and resource usage. Schedules integrate directly with runbooks without requiring external services, providing a streamlined and cost-effective solution for time-based automation tasks.
Azure Logic Apps can schedule workflow executions and trigger Azure Automation runbooks, it introduces additional complexity and cost when native Azure Automation schedules already provide the required functionality. Logic Apps would require creating separate workflows to invoke Automation runbooks on schedules, essentially duplicating capabilities that exist within Automation. For scenarios where runbook execution simply needs time-based scheduling without complex workflow orchestration or external service integration, using Azure Automation’s built-in scheduling feature is more efficient, straightforward, and cost-effective than implementing Logic Apps workflows.
Azure Functions timer triggers are designed to execute serverless function code on schedules, not to schedule Azure Automation runbooks. While Functions could theoretically be created to invoke Automation runbooks via API calls on timer triggers, this approach adds unnecessary layers of complexity and additional services. Functions excel at executing custom code on schedules but are not the appropriate tool for scheduling existing Automation runbooks. Azure Automation provides native scheduling capabilities specifically designed for runbook execution, making Functions timer triggers an overcomplicated solution for this requirement.
Azure Event Grid subscriptions are designed to react to events occurring in Azure services rather than schedule recurring time-based automation. Event Grid operates on an event-driven architecture where actions are triggered by events such as blob creation, resource modifications, or custom application events. While powerful for reactive automation scenarios, Event Grid does not provide time-based scheduling capabilities. For starting and stopping servers during specific time windows or on recurring schedules, Azure Automation schedules provide the appropriate time-driven execution mechanism rather than the event-driven approach of Event Grid.
Question 28:
You need to configure Azure Policy Guest Configuration to audit software installed on Azure Arc-enabled Windows servers. Which component runs on the server?
A) Azure Policy agent
B) Guest Configuration extension
C) Azure Automation agent
D) Azure Security agent
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Guest Configuration extension is the correct answer because it is the component deployed to Azure Arc-enabled servers to enable Azure Policy Guest Configuration auditing and configuration capabilities. The extension runs on the server and evaluates the system state against defined policy requirements, such as verifying installed software, checking registry settings, or validating file configurations. Guest Configuration uses PowerShell Desired State Configuration resources under the hood to assess compliance, generating compliance reports that are sent back to Azure Policy. The extension operates continuously, periodically re-evaluating compliance and updating Azure Policy with current status, enabling organizations to monitor configuration drift and enforce standards across hybrid infrastructure.
there is no separate Azure Policy agent component. Azure Policy for guest configuration capabilities is delivered through the Guest Configuration extension rather than a standalone policy agent. Azure Policy itself is a cloud service that evaluates resource compliance at the Azure Resource Manager level, while the Guest Configuration extension provides the in-guest evaluation capabilities needed to assess configurations within the operating system. The extension integrates with Azure Policy but represents the actual on-server component that performs configuration auditing and enforcement within the guest operating system.
the Azure Automation agent is used specifically for Azure Automation services like Hybrid Runbook Worker functionality and Update Management, not for Azure Policy Guest Configuration. While both services might be used together in a comprehensive management strategy, they serve different purposes. The Automation agent enables runbook execution and automation tasks, while Guest Configuration focuses on configuration compliance auditing and enforcement. For Azure Policy Guest Configuration to audit software installations and system configurations, the dedicated Guest Configuration extension must be installed rather than the Automation agent.
Azure Security agent is associated with Microsoft Defender for Cloud for security monitoring and threat detection rather than configuration compliance auditing. While security monitoring and configuration compliance both contribute to overall security posture, they use different agents and serve different purposes. Defender for Cloud monitors for security threats and vulnerabilities, while Azure Policy Guest Configuration audits configuration compliance against defined standards. For assessing installed software and configuration settings through Azure Policy, the Guest Configuration extension provides the necessary in-guest assessment capabilities.
Question 29:
Your company wants to use Azure Bastion to securely connect to Azure Arc-enabled servers. What limitation exists for this scenario?
A) Bastion requires public IP addresses on servers
B) Bastion only supports Azure VMs currently
C) Bastion requires ExpressRoute connectivity
D) Bastion only supports Linux servers
Answer: B
Explanation:
Bastion only supporting Azure VMs currently is the correct answer because Azure Bastion is designed specifically to provide secure RDP and SSH connectivity to Azure virtual machines within Azure virtual networks, and it does not support direct connectivity to Azure Arc-enabled servers located on-premises or in other clouds. Bastion acts as a jump server within an Azure VNet, providing browser-based secure access to VMs without exposing them through public IP addresses. Since Arc-enabled servers reside outside Azure virtual networks in physical datacenters or other cloud environments, they cannot be accessed through Azure Bastion’s architecture. Organizations needing secure remote access to Arc-enabled servers must use traditional remote access methods or implement on-premises bastion solutions.
Azure Bastion specifically eliminates the need for public IP addresses on target virtual machines, which is actually one of its primary security benefits. Bastion provides secure access to VMs that only have private IP addresses within an Azure VNet by acting as a secure gateway. Users connect to the Bastion host through the Azure portal, and Bastion establishes the RDP or SSH connection to the target VM using private IP addresses. The limitation with Arc-enabled servers is not related to public IP requirements but rather that Arc-enabled servers exist outside Azure VNets where Bastion operates.
Azure Bastion does not require ExpressRoute connectivity to function. Bastion operates within Azure virtual networks and provides access to VMs in those networks through the Azure portal interface using standard HTTPS connections. While ExpressRoute provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, it is not a requirement for Bastion functionality. Bastion works with standard internet connectivity through the Azure portal. The actual limitation is that Bastion is designed for Azure VMs within Azure VNets and cannot currently access Arc-enabled servers regardless of network connectivity methods.
Azure Bastion supports both Windows and Linux virtual machines, providing RDP access for Windows VMs and SSH access for Linux VMs. Bastion’s support is not limited to either operating system but rather provides secure remote access to both platforms running in Azure. The protocol used depends on the target VM’s operating system, with Bastion automatically providing the appropriate connection method. The limitation preventing Bastion use with Arc-enabled servers is not related to operating system support but rather to the architectural restriction that Bastion only works with Azure VMs within Azure virtual networks.
Question 30:
You are implementing Azure Monitor Application Insights for applications running on Azure Arc-enabled servers. Which instrumentation method requires no code changes?
A) SDK instrumentation
B) Auto-instrumentation
C) Manual instrumentation
D) Custom event tracking
Answer: B
Explanation:
Auto-instrumentation is the correct answer because it enables Application Insights monitoring for applications without requiring any modifications to application source code. Auto-instrumentation uses runtime agents or modules that intercept application calls and automatically collect telemetry data including request rates, response times, dependencies, and exceptions. For applications running on Azure Arc-enabled servers, auto-instrumentation can be deployed through the Application Insights agent, which supports various application frameworks and platforms. This approach significantly reduces the effort required to implement application monitoring and allows teams to gain observability into applications without development effort or application redeployment. Auto-instrumentation is particularly valuable for commercial off-the-shelf applications or legacy systems where source code modification is impractical or impossible.
SDK instrumentation explicitly requires adding Application Insights SDK libraries to the application code and making code changes to initialize the SDK and send telemetry. While SDK instrumentation provides the most flexibility and control over what data is collected, it necessitates development effort, code modifications, and application redeployment. Developers must add SDK references, configure initialization code, and potentially add custom tracking calls throughout the application. This approach contradicts the requirement for no code changes. SDK instrumentation is powerful but requires deliberate development effort rather than providing zero-code deployment.
manual instrumentation refers to explicitly adding telemetry collection code throughout the application, which requires extensive code modifications. Manual instrumentation involves developers writing code to track specific events, metrics, and traces at relevant points in the application logic. This approach provides maximum control and customization but demands significant development effort and ongoing maintenance as the application evolves. Manual instrumentation is the opposite of a no-code solution, requiring substantial code changes to instrument the application. For scenarios requiring no code changes, auto-instrumentation provides the appropriate approach.
custom event tracking requires developers to add specific code that sends custom telemetry events to Application Insights at appropriate points in the application. Custom events are used to track business-specific metrics or user interactions that automatic telemetry does not capture. Implementing custom event tracking necessitates code modifications to call Application Insights APIs or SDK methods at relevant locations. While valuable for capturing application-specific insights, custom event tracking requires code changes and therefore does not meet the requirement for instrumentation without code modifications. Auto-instrumentation provides monitoring capabilities without any code changes required.