Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 10 Q136-150

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 136:

You need to enable private, secure, and low-latency communication between VNets located in different regions, ensuring traffic does not traverse the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows VNets in different Azure regions to communicate using private IP addresses over Microsoft’s backbone network. This ensures traffic remains private, secure, and low-latency, making it ideal for distributed multi-tier applications, such as web, application, and database layers hosted in separate VNets across regions. By using the Microsoft backbone, Global VNet Peering eliminates the dependency on the public internet, providing predictable performance, high throughput, and reliability for enterprise workloads.

Option B, VPN Gateway, establishes encrypted connections over the public internet. While it secures traffic, it is subject to variable latency, bandwidth constraints, and reliance on internet availability. Multi-VNet setups require additional tunnels and routing, increasing operational complexity and the risk of misconfiguration.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Using ExpressRoute for inter-VNet communication is cost-inefficient and operationally unnecessary because it is designed primarily for hybrid cloud connectivity rather than intra-cloud VNet communication.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. NSGs provide granular access control but do not create connectivity; they complement Global VNet Peering by securing traffic but cannot replace its functionality.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures private, high-performance connectivity between regions. Enterprises benefit from predictable performance, operational simplicity, and secure cross-region communication. NSGs can be layered on top to enforce granular traffic control. Global VNet Peering supports hub-and-spoke topologies, disaster recovery, and multi-region deployments, aligning with enterprise networking best practices for scalability, security, and operational efficiency. It provides the foundation for mission-critical applications that require secure, private, and high-throughput inter-VNet communication. Global VNet Peering is a pivotal feature in Azure that enables seamless and private connectivity between virtual networks located in different Azure regions. Unlike standard VNet Peering, which is limited to VNets within the same region, Global VNet Peering leverages Microsoft’s global backbone network to connect VNets across regions, providing a high-performance, low-latency communication channel. This private connectivity eliminates the need for data to traverse the public internet, enhancing security and reliability for applications that span multiple geographic locations. Enterprises with distributed workloads, such as multinational corporations or services with globally dispersed user bases, benefit significantly from this capability because it supports cross-region redundancy, disaster recovery, and multi-region failover strategies without sacrificing performance.

The design of Global VNet Peering ensures that data remains within Azure’s trusted infrastructure, which is crucial for organizations with strict regulatory or compliance requirements. By keeping inter-VNet traffic off the public internet, organizations can meet data sovereignty requirements and mitigate exposure to external threats. Additionally, because the peering connection uses private IP addresses, applications and services communicate as if they are part of the same network, simplifying network architecture and reducing the complexity associated with managing multiple network segments. Global VNet Peering supports both hub-and-spoke and mesh network topologies, providing flexibility for enterprise architects to design scalable and resilient cloud networks. This is particularly important for scenarios where multiple VNets need to communicate with a central hub VNet or with each other directly to support collaborative workflows or multi-tier applications.

Operational simplicity is another significant advantage. Unlike VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute, Global VNet Peering does not require the configuration and management of additional encryption tunnels or circuits for VNet-to-VNet communication. This reduces administrative overhead and minimizes the potential for misconfiguration, which can lead to connectivity issues or security vulnerabilities. Moreover, because it uses Azure’s backbone network, performance is more predictable and consistent than internet-based VPN connections. Latency is minimized, bandwidth is higher, and throughput is far more reliable, which is critical for performance-sensitive applications such as real-time data processing, video streaming, and large-scale database replication.

Global VNet Peering also complements other Azure networking services to enhance security and manageability. For instance, Network Security Groups (NSGs) can be applied to control traffic flows at the subnet or virtual machine level, ensuring that only authorized communications occur between peered VNets. Similarly, Azure Firewall can be used alongside Global VNet Peering to provide centralized policy enforcement, threat detection, and logging for cross-region traffic. By combining these services, organizations can achieve a secure, high-performance, and highly available network architecture that supports modern enterprise workloads.

In summary, Global VNet Peering is not merely a connectivity solution; it is a strategic enabler for enterprises seeking to deploy multi-region applications with high availability, robust security, and operational efficiency. It reduces complexity, enhances performance, ensures private communication, and integrates seamlessly with other Azure security and networking services, making it an essential tool for any organization aiming to build scalable, resilient, and secure cloud infrastructures. Its role in supporting mission-critical applications, disaster recovery strategies, and global operations underscores its value in enterprise networking and cloud architecture planning.

Question 137:

You need to enforce centralized outbound traffic inspection and security policies across multiple VNets while ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall that provides centralized inspection of outbound traffic across multiple VNets. Administrators can define network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence for proactive threat detection, and log all traffic for auditing and monitoring. Azure Firewall scales automatically to handle traffic growth and provides built-in high availability to ensure continuous policy enforcement during peak traffic or regional outages.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. While critical for segmentation, NSGs lack centralized management, automatic scaling, and application-level inspection capabilities. They are insufficient for enterprise-wide outbound traffic inspection across multiple VNets.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 to improve availability but does not provide traffic inspection or security policy enforcement. Its function is strictly high availability, not security.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities. However, it only inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic and cannot manage all outbound traffic across multiple VNets or enforce centralized policies.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows enterprises to enforce consistent security policies, enhance threat detection, and meet compliance requirements. Its centralized architecture reduces operational complexity, minimizes configuration errors, and scales automatically with demand. Threat intelligence blocks known malicious sources, while logging provides visibility for audits and monitoring. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling centralized traffic inspection without multiple appliances. High availability and automatic scaling ensure uninterrupted enforcement, aligning with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and operationally efficient cloud networks. Azure Firewall provides robust security, operational simplicity, and enhanced compliance for enterprise workloads. Azure Firewall plays a critical role in modern enterprise cloud architecture by providing a centralized, fully managed solution for monitoring and controlling network traffic across multiple Azure VNets. Unlike traditional firewalls that require manual scaling and complex configuration, Azure Firewall offers automatic scaling to accommodate increasing network demands, ensuring that organizations maintain consistent security enforcement regardless of traffic volume. This ability to scale seamlessly is particularly valuable for enterprises with dynamic workloads, seasonal traffic spikes, or globally distributed applications, where unpredictable traffic patterns could otherwise compromise performance or security. By centralizing security inspection, Azure Firewall reduces the operational burden on IT teams, who would otherwise need to manage multiple firewalls across different VNets, regions, or resource groups, often with inconsistent policies and monitoring practices.

One of the key strengths of Azure Firewall is its stateful inspection capability, which allows it to track active connections and intelligently filter traffic based on both source and destination, as well as protocol and port information. This ensures that only authorized traffic flows through the network while blocking suspicious or malicious attempts. Furthermore, Azure Firewall integrates with Microsoft’s threat intelligence feed, enabling proactive protection by automatically identifying and blocking traffic from known malicious IP addresses or domains. This proactive approach helps organizations mitigate risks before threats can impact their workloads, reducing the likelihood of data breaches or service disruptions. The combination of stateful inspection and threat intelligence creates a robust defense mechanism that is difficult to achieve with individual NSGs or other localized security solutions.

Azure Firewall also enhances compliance and governance by providing comprehensive logging and monitoring capabilities. All network activity passing through the firewall can be logged, stored, and analyzed, enabling detailed audits, forensic investigations, and regulatory reporting. This level of visibility ensures that enterprises can demonstrate compliance with standards such as ISO, SOC, or GDPR, while also gaining actionable insights into traffic patterns and potential security anomalies. The centralized nature of Azure Firewall simplifies policy management, allowing administrators to define and enforce consistent rules across multiple VNets, eliminating discrepancies that could arise from managing separate firewalls or NSGs in isolation.

In addition, Azure Firewall supports sophisticated routing and network architectures, such as hub-and-spoke topologies, which are common in large-scale enterprise deployments. By positioning Azure Firewall in a hub VNet, organizations can centralize traffic inspection for multiple spoke VNets, minimizing the need for multiple appliances and reducing overall operational complexity. This approach not only streamlines network design but also enhances security by providing a single point for policy enforcement, threat detection, and logging. The firewall’s high availability architecture ensures that inspection and enforcement continue uninterrupted even in the event of regional failures or traffic spikes, maintaining business continuity and operational resilience.

Moreover, Azure Firewall complements other Azure services such as Azure Monitor, Sentinel, and Application Gateway, creating a layered security framework that addresses both network and application-level threats. Integration with these services allows organizations to correlate firewall logs with other security events, implement automated responses to detected threats, and gain deeper insights into potential vulnerabilities. Enterprises can thus achieve a holistic security posture that balances operational efficiency, scalability, and proactive threat management. Azure Firewall is not just a network security tool—it is a foundational element for building secure, resilient, and compliant cloud infrastructures capable of supporting critical enterprise workloads in a dynamic, multi-VNet environment. Its combination of centralized management, automatic scaling, threat intelligence integration, and comprehensive logging makes it indispensable for organizations seeking both operational simplicity and robust security.

Question 138:

You need to dynamically propagate routes across multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances to enable centralized inspection with minimal manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation between VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates the need for manual route configuration, prevents misrouting errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex networks. Integration with NVAs allows centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across multiple VNets. Route Server is particularly valuable for enterprise-scale networks where manual route management would be operationally intensive and error-prone.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing via BGP but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet dynamic routing using VPN Gateway still requires manual route configuration, adding operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure but does not automatically propagate routes between VNets or integrate with NVAs for inspection. Manual configuration is required, reducing efficiency for large networks.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot handle dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server but do not replace its routing capabilities.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures reliable, automated route propagation while integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises benefit from operational efficiency, reduced human error, and high availability. Route Server provides visibility into route propagation, anomaly detection, and compliance across distributed networks. Supporting hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, it delivers consistent, secure, and scalable routing. Combining dynamic routing with centralized inspection aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and efficient network management, enabling operational simplicity, enhanced security, and reliable communication across complex network topologies. Azure Route Server is a transformative networking service within Azure that fundamentally simplifies the management of route propagation in complex network architectures. By leveraging the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), it enables dynamic exchange of routing information between Azure VNets, network virtual appliances (NVAs), and on-premises routers, eliminating the need for manual route entry. In large-scale enterprises where multiple VNets, regional deployments, and hybrid connections exist, the traditional approach of manually configuring routes can be extremely time-consuming and prone to human error. Route Server automates this process, ensuring that any changes in network topology, such as the addition of a new VNet or the deployment of additional NVAs, are automatically reflected in the routing tables of connected devices. This significantly reduces operational overhead, enhances network reliability, and minimizes the risk of misrouting or traffic loss.

Integration with NVAs further enhances Route Server’s value by providing a centralized point for traffic inspection, monitoring, and policy enforcement. Enterprises can deploy NVAs to perform firewalling, intrusion detection, or other network security functions, and the Route Server ensures that traffic is correctly routed through these appliances without requiring manual intervention. This centralized inspection model enables organizations to maintain consistent security policies across multiple VNets and geographic regions, supporting compliance requirements and reducing the potential for configuration inconsistencies that could lead to vulnerabilities. Additionally, because Route Server propagates routes dynamically, organizations can implement high-availability designs with redundant NVAs or redundant paths, confident that routing updates will be automatically distributed without additional configuration.

For hybrid and multi-region network architectures, Azure Route Server is particularly beneficial. It enables seamless connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, as well as between VNets in different regions, without requiring complex peering arrangements or manual route updates. This capability allows organizations to scale their networks efficiently while maintaining secure and predictable routing. By supporting hub-and-spoke topologies, Route Server centralizes control over traffic flow, making it easier to enforce security, auditing, and monitoring standards while reducing the need for multiple, separate routing configurations. Multi-region deployments, disaster recovery solutions, and large-scale enterprise workloads benefit from the predictable performance and operational simplicity that Route Server provides.

Operational visibility is another key advantage. Route Server allows administrators to track and monitor route propagation across all connected VNets and NVAs, providing insights into network health, routing anomalies, and potential misconfigurations. This visibility supports proactive troubleshooting, anomaly detection, and compliance reporting, allowing organizations to maintain robust network governance and operational discipline. Unlike VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute, which focus on connectivity but require manual route configuration for multi-VNet dynamic routing, Route Server centralizes both routing and network traffic oversight, streamlining network management at scale.

In summary, Azure Route Server is more than just a dynamic routing tool—it is an enabler of efficient, secure, and scalable network operations in complex Azure environments. By automating route propagation, integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection, and providing visibility into routing behavior, it reduces operational complexity, enhances security, and ensures consistent and reliable communication across enterprise networks. Its design aligns with enterprise best practices for high availability, operational efficiency, and compliance, making it indispensable for organizations managing sophisticated, multi-region, or hybrid cloud deployments. The combination of automation, security integration, and operational visibility positions Azure Route Server as a cornerstone of modern enterprise network architecture in Azure.

Question 139:

You need to provide private, high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, ensuring predictable performance and enterprise-grade reliability. Which service should you deploy?

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is critical for enterprise workloads requiring reliable and consistent network performance. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, enabling hybrid deployments for mission-critical applications such as real-time analytics, financial systems, and large-scale data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity but is subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and internet reliability. VPN Gateway is less suitable for enterprise workloads requiring consistent performance and predictable connectivity.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure remote access to VMs without public IPs. It is focused on administrative access rather than high-throughput, low-latency connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity or throughput guarantees. They are complementary to connectivity solutions but cannot replace transport mechanisms.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Monitoring tools allow proactive performance tracking, capacity planning, and operational management. By bypassing the public internet, ExpressRoute enhances security and reliability, supporting disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade workloads. This solution aligns with hybrid cloud networking best practices, providing operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations achieve predictable performance, enhanced security, and reduced operational complexity, ensuring business-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.ExpressRoute also offers integration with Microsoft’s global network, enabling connections to Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, and other Azure services with the same predictable performance and security guarantees. This integration reduces the dependency on public internet paths even for cloud service traffic, further improving reliability and consistency. Enterprises can implement redundant ExpressRoute circuits to ensure high availability and failover capabilities, minimizing the risk of downtime for critical workloads. Additionally, ExpressRoute supports advanced routing features, including private peering and Microsoft peering, allowing organizations to segment traffic for internal applications and cloud services efficiently. This combination of high performance, security, and flexibility makes ExpressRoute an essential component of hybrid cloud architectures.

Question 140:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and support disaster recovery. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports routing methods including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic during failures, ensuring high availability, performance optimization, and disaster recovery readiness. This capability is essential for globally distributed applications where latency minimization and uptime reliability are critical.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 regional load balancing with WAF capabilities, but cannot perform global DNS-based routing, health-based failover, or latency-based routing across multiple regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot provide global endpoint routing, health-based failover, or latency optimization for global users.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery support. Its function is security enforcement rather than high availability or performance optimization.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the closest healthy endpoint, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global application availability and supports disaster recovery by rerouting traffic automatically during regional outages. Traffic monitoring provides visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint health, and user experience, enabling proactive management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for globally distributed applications, ensuring operational continuity, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. It provides intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover for resilient, scalable, and globally distributed enterprise applications.

Question 141:

You need to provide private, secure communication between multiple VNets located in different regions without traversing the public internet, while ensuring high throughput and low latency. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering provides private, high-speed connectivity between VNets across different Azure regions using private IP addresses over Microsoft’s backbone network. By avoiding the public internet, Global VNet Peering ensures traffic security, predictable latency, and high throughput, making it ideal for multi-tier applications where different layers, such as web, application, and database, reside in separate VNets across regions. Global VNet Peering simplifies network management, eliminates complex VPN or ExpressRoute configurations, and reduces operational overhead.

Option B, VPN Gateway, encrypts traffic over the internet, but it is subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and reliance on public internet stability. Multi-region setups require additional tunnels, routing, and monitoring, increasing complexity and operational risk.

Option C, ExpressRoute, is designed for private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. Using ExpressRoute solely for inter-VNet communication is operationally unnecessary and cost-inefficient, as it is optimized for hybrid cloud scenarios rather than intra-cloud VNet communication.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level, but cannot establish connectivity. NSGs complement Global VNet Peering by providing granular access control, but cannot replace connectivity.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures secure, private, high-throughput, low-latency communication across regions. It supports hub-and-spoke architectures, disaster recovery scenarios, and multi-region deployments while simplifying network operations. Integration with NSGs enhances security through granular traffic control without compromising connectivity. Global VNet Peering aligns with enterprise best practices for scalable, secure, and operationally efficient network architecture, ensuring mission-critical applications communicate reliably and securely across regions.

Question 142:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement across multiple VNets, with automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall providing centralized inspection and policy enforcement for outbound traffic across multiple VNets. Administrators can define network and application rules, utilize threat intelligence to proactively block malicious traffic, and log all traffic for monitoring and auditing. Azure Firewall automatically scales to accommodate traffic demand and offers high availability, ensuring continuous enforcement even during traffic spikes or regional outages.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. While essential for segmentation, NSGs lack centralized policy enforcement, automatic scaling, and application-level inspection. They are insufficient for enterprise-scale outbound traffic inspection across multiple VNets.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, provides layer 4 traffic distribution to improve availability but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. Its function is strictly high availability and load balancing, not security enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, offers layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities, but only inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot manage all outbound traffic across multiple VNets or enforce centralized policies.

Deploying Azure Firewall enables enterprises to enforce consistent security policies, improve threat detection, and maintain compliance across multiple VNets. Centralized architecture reduces operational complexity and configuration errors. Threat intelligence proactively blocks known malicious traffic, and logging provides visibility for auditing and monitoring. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling centralized inspection without deploying multiple appliances. High availability and automatic scaling ensure uninterrupted enforcement, aligning with enterprise best practices for secure, scalable, and operationally efficient cloud networks. Azure Firewall provides robust security, operational simplicity, and enhanced compliance for enterprise workloads.

Question 143:

You need to dynamically propagate routes between multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances to enable centralized inspection, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server automates route propagation across VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. This eliminates manual configuration, prevents misrouting errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex networks. Integration with NVAs allows centralized inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across VNets. Route Server is particularly beneficial for enterprise-scale networks where manual routing would be operationally intensive and error-prone.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports dynamic routing using BGP but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet dynamic routing with VPN Gateway still requires manual route configuration, adding administrative overhead and operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure, but does not automatically propagate routes between VNets or integrate with NVAs. Manual configuration is required, reducing efficiency for large-scale enterprise deployments.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot manage dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server by securing traffic, but they cannot replace its routing functionality.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated, reliable route propagation while integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises benefit from reduced operational overhead, fewer configuration errors, and high availability. Route Server provides visibility into route propagation, anomaly detection, and ensures compliance across distributed networks. Supporting hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, Route Server delivers consistent, secure, and scalable routing. Combining dynamic routing with centralized inspection aligns with enterprise best practices, enabling operational simplicity, enhanced security, and reliable communication across complex network topologies.

Question 144:

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This guarantees predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is critical for enterprise workloads requiring reliable and consistent network connectivity. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, enabling hybrid cloud deployments for mission-critical applications such as real-time analytics, financial systems, and large-scale data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted connectivity over the internet but is subject to latency fluctuations, bandwidth limitations, and public internet reliability. VPN Gateway is less suitable for enterprise workloads that demand predictable performance.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure administrative access to VMs without public IPs. Bastion is focused on management access rather than high-throughput, low-latency connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity, throughput guarantees, or predictable latency. NSGs complement connectivity solutions but cannot replace transport mechanisms.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Integration with monitoring tools supports performance tracking, capacity planning, and operational management. Bypassing the public internet enhances security and reliability, supporting disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade workloads. This aligns with hybrid cloud networking best practices, providing operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations achieve predictable performance, operational efficiency, and enhanced security, ensuring business-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.

Question 145:

You need to route global users to the nearest healthy application endpoint to optimize performance, maintain high availability, and ensure disaster recovery support. Which Azure service should you implement?

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic during failures, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. This is essential for globally distributed applications where latency minimization and uptime reliability are critical.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides regional layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities but cannot perform global DNS-based routing, health-based failover, or latency-based routing across multiple regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot route traffic globally, provide health-based failover, or optimize latency for global applications.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery support. Its primary role is security enforcement rather than high availability or performance optimization.

Question 146:

You need to provide private, low-latency, and secure connectivity between multiple VNets in different regions, ensuring that traffic does not traverse the public internet. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Global VNet Peering
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Global VNet Peering allows VNets in different Azure regions to communicate privately using private IP addresses over Microsoft’s global backbone network. This ensures that traffic remains secure, low-latency, and high-throughput. For multi-tier applications, where web, application, and database tiers are distributed across VNets in multiple regions, Global VNet Peering provides seamless connectivity without the dependency on the public internet. This service simplifies network management by eliminating the need for complex VPN tunnels, BGP configurations, or additional infrastructure components.

Option B, VPN Gateway, encrypts traffic over the internet. While secure, the VPN Gateway is subject to variable latency, bandwidth limitations, and reliability issues associated with public internet connectivity. Multi-region configurations require additional tunnels, routing, and monitoring, which increases operational complexity.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides dedicated private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure. Using it for inter-VNet communication across Azure regions is operationally unnecessary and cost-prohibitive since it is optimized for hybrid cloud scenarios rather than intra-cloud connectivity.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but do not provide actual connectivity. NSGs complement VNet Peering by controlling traffic, but cannot replace the connectivity itself.

Deploying Global VNet Peering ensures private, high-performance, low-latency communication across regions. Enterprises benefit from operational simplicity, scalability, and secure communication between VNets. NSGs can be layered on top for granular security control. Global VNet Peering supports hub-and-spoke architectures, disaster recovery, and multi-region deployments, aligning with enterprise networking best practices. It ensures that mission-critical applications operate reliably with secure, private, and high-throughput inter-VNet communication.

Question 147:

You need to implement centralized outbound traffic inspection and policy enforcement for multiple VNets, ensuring automatic scaling and high availability. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Firewall
B) NSGs
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Application Gateway

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Firewall is a fully managed, stateful firewall that provides centralized inspection and policy enforcement for outbound traffic across multiple VNets. It allows administrators to define network and application rules, integrate threat intelligence to proactively block malicious traffic, and log all traffic for auditing and monitoring purposes. Azure Firewall automatically scales based on traffic demands and provides built-in high availability to ensure continuous enforcement even during peak loads or regional failures.

Option B, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level. They are essential for segmentation but lack centralized management, automatic scaling, and application-level inspection. NSGs cannot enforce enterprise-scale outbound traffic inspection.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, distributes traffic at layer 4 to improve availability but does not inspect traffic or enforce security policies. Its primary function is high availability and load distribution, not security enforcement.

Option D, Application Gateway, provides layer 7 load balancing and WAF capabilities but only inspects HTTP/HTTPS traffic. It cannot inspect all outbound traffic or enforce centralized policies across VNets.

Deploying Azure Firewall allows enterprises to maintain consistent security policies, enhance threat detection, and comply with regulatory requirements. Its centralized architecture reduces operational complexity and human error. Threat intelligence proactively blocks malicious traffic, and logging provides visibility for audits and monitoring. Azure Firewall supports hub-and-spoke architectures, enabling centralized inspection without multiple appliances. High availability and automatic scaling ensure uninterrupted enforcement. Azure Firewall aligns with enterprise best practices by providing scalable, secure, and operationally efficient traffic inspection and policy enforcement for complex cloud environments.

Question 148:

You need to dynamically propagate routes between multiple VNets and integrate network virtual appliances for centralized inspection, minimizing manual configuration. Which Azure service should you deploy?

A) Azure Route Server
B) VPN Gateway
C) ExpressRoute
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Route Server provides automated route propagation across VNets, NVAs, and on-premises routers using BGP. It eliminates the need for manual route management, prevents misrouting errors, and ensures consistent routing across complex networks. Integration with NVAs allows centralized traffic inspection and policy enforcement, maintaining security and compliance across VNets. Route Server is particularly advantageous for enterprise-scale networks where manual routing would be labor-intensive, error-prone, and operationally inefficient.

Option B, VPN Gateway, supports BGP-based dynamic routing but does not integrate directly with NVAs for centralized inspection. Multi-VNet dynamic routing via VPN Gateway still requires manual route configuration, monitoring, and administrative overhead.

Option C, ExpressRoute, provides private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure but does not automatically propagate routes between VNets or integrate with NVAs. Manual configuration is required, reducing efficiency for large-scale networks.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules at the subnet or NIC level but cannot handle dynamic routing or centralized inspection. NSGs complement the Route Server by securing traffic, but do not replace its routing capabilities.

Deploying Azure Route Server ensures automated and reliable route propagation while integrating with NVAs for centralized inspection. Enterprises gain operational efficiency, reduced configuration errors, and high availability. Route Server provides visibility into route propagation, anomaly detection, and ensures compliance across distributed networks. Supporting hub-and-spoke, hybrid, and multi-region architectures, it delivers consistent, secure, and scalable routing. Combining dynamic routing with centralized inspection aligns with enterprise best practices, enabling operational simplicity, enhanced security, and reliable communication across complex network topologies.

Question 149:

A) ExpressRoute
B) VPN Gateway
C) Azure Bastion
D) NSGs

Answer:
A

Explanation:

ExpressRoute provides dedicated, private connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, bypassing the public internet. This ensures predictable performance, low latency, and high throughput, which is essential for enterprise workloads requiring reliable and consistent connectivity. ExpressRoute supports multi-VNet and multi-region connectivity, enabling hybrid deployments for mission-critical applications such as real-time analytics, financial systems, and large-scale data processing.

Option B, VPN Gateway, provides encrypted internet-based connectivity but is subject to latency fluctuations, bandwidth limitations, and public internet reliability. VPN Gateway is less suitable for workloads that require predictable and consistent performance.

Option C, Azure Bastion, provides secure remote access to VMs without public IPs. Bastion focuses on administrative access rather than high-throughput, low-latency connectivity between on-premises networks and VNets.

Option D, NSGs, enforce traffic rules but do not provide connectivity, throughput guarantees, or predictable latency. They complement connectivity solutions but cannot replace dedicated transport mechanisms.

Deploying ExpressRoute ensures predictable, high-performance connectivity between on-premises networks and Azure VNets. Integration with monitoring and analytics tools allows for proactive performance tracking, capacity planning, and operational management. By bypassing the public internet, ExpressRoute enhances both security and reliability. It supports disaster recovery, multi-VNet communication, and enterprise-grade workloads. This aligns with hybrid cloud networking best practices, providing operational simplicity, scalability, and enterprise-grade reliability. Organizations benefit from predictable performance, operational efficiency, and enhanced security, ensuring business-critical workloads function optimally in Azure.

Question 150:

A) Azure Traffic Manager
B) Application Gateway
C) Standard Load Balancer
D) Azure Firewall

Answer:
A

Explanation:

Azure Traffic Manager is a global DNS-based routing solution that directs users to the nearest or healthiest application endpoint. It supports multiple routing methods, including performance-based, priority, weighted, and geographic routing. Traffic Manager continuously monitors endpoint health and automatically reroutes traffic in case of failures, ensuring high availability, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. This capability is essential for globally distributed applications where latency reduction and uptime reliability are critical.

Option B, Application Gateway, provides regional layer 7 load balancing with WAF capabilities, but cannot perform global DNS-based routing, health-based failover, or latency-based routing across multiple regions.

Option C, Standard Load Balancer, operates at layer 4 and is region-specific. It cannot route traffic globally, provide health-based failover, or optimize latency for global applications.

Option D, Azure Firewall, inspects and filters traffic for security purposes but does not provide global routing or disaster recovery support. Its primary function is security enforcement rather than high availability or performance optimization.

Deploying Azure Traffic Manager ensures users are routed to the closest healthy endpoint, minimizing latency and improving responsiveness. It enhances global application availability and supports disaster recovery by automatically rerouting traffic during regional outages. Traffic monitoring provides visibility into traffic patterns, endpoint health, and user experience, enabling proactive management. Traffic Manager aligns with enterprise best practices for globally distributed applications, ensuring operational continuity, optimized performance, and disaster recovery readiness. It provides intelligent routing, health monitoring, and automatic failover for resilient, scalable, and globally distributed enterprise applications.

Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 10 Q136-150

Related posts: