Google Professional Cloud Architect on Google Cloud Platform Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q106-120

Visit here for our full Google Professional Cloud Architect exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 106:

A retail company wants to build a recommendation system for their e-commerce platform. They need a service that can train models on user behavior, product metadata, and transaction history, and deploy predictions in real time. Which service should they use?

A) Cloud Run
B) Vertex AI
C) Dataproc
D) Cloud Functions

Answer: B)

Explanation:

A retail company building a recommendation system requires a platform that supports the complete machine learning lifecycle. Training recommendation models involves ingesting large datasets, such as user click streams, purchase histories, product attributes, and session interactions. A managed ML platform simplifies infrastructure provisioning, allowing data scientists to focus on feature engineering, model training, hyperparameter tuning, and deployment. Vertex AI provides automated hyperparameter tuning, scalable distributed training, and integration with managed data pipelines like Dataflow for preprocessing. It supports custom TensorFlow, PyTorch, and scikit-learn models, making it flexible for collaborative experimentation.

A serverless container platform is ideal for hosting lightweight applications and APIs but lacks features for model training at scale. While it can serve models after deployment, it does not manage distributed GPU/TPU training or hyperparameter tuning.

A cluster-based data processing platform can run distributed ML jobs but requires manual infrastructure setup, cluster management, and orchestration. Teams would need to handle resource scaling, retries, logging, and monitoring themselves, which increases operational complexity.

Serverless functions handle small, event-driven tasks but are unsuitable for batch or distributed model training. They cannot allocate GPUs or run multi-hour jobs.

Vertex AI also supports online prediction endpoints for real-time recommendation delivery, allowing personalized suggestions to appear instantly as users browse. Models can be retrained periodically or continuously updated via pipelines, ensuring the recommendation engine stays relevant. Integration with BigQuery and Cloud Storage allows access to structured and unstructured data without complex ETL. Furthermore, Vertex AI provides monitoring and explainability tools to ensure model predictions are transparent, helping compliance in retail environments. Combined, these capabilities make Vertex AI the best solution for the recommendation system.

Question 107:

A media streaming service wants to analyze user interactions in real time to update content recommendations. They need a low-latency streaming pipeline with integration to BigQuery and machine learning. Which architecture should they use?

A) Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery
B) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → Cloud Storage
C) Dataproc → Cloud Storage → BigQuery
D) Memorystore → Compute Engine → BigQuery

Answer: A)

Explanation:

A media streaming service collecting real-time user interactions requires ingestion of millions of events per second, including playbacks, pauses, likes, searches, and user session metrics. These events must be processed immediately to update recommendation models and provide low-latency personalization. A messaging system capable of global ingestion ensures reliability and durability of incoming events. A stream processing engine supports windowed aggregations, real-time transformations, and enrichment.

Pub/Sub acts as the ingestion layer, providing high throughput and low-latency delivery with at-least-once guarantees. Dataflow enables processing pipelines with support for event time, stateful computations, and dynamic work rebalancing. It also integrates with ML models from Vertex AI, allowing real-time scoring of recommendations. BigQuery provides analytical storage for both raw and aggregated data, enabling batch analytics, dashboards, and model retraining.

Relational databases and serverless functions are insufficient for the scale and latency required for real-time streaming analytics. Batch processing platforms like Dataproc are not designed for low-latency streaming. In-memory caches cannot persist large-scale analytics reliably and cannot perform aggregations on millions of events per second.

Using this architecture, the streaming service achieves real-time insights, supports immediate personalization, and allows batch analysis for strategic planning. Reliability, low latency, and seamless integration with analytics and ML make this pipeline the optimal solution.

Question108:

A logistics company wants to store IoT telemetry from vehicles in a horizontally scalable NoSQL database optimized for time-series queries. Which database should they choose?

A) Firestore
B) Cloud SQL
C) Bigtable
D) Memorystore

Answer: C)

Explanation:

IoT telemetry systems generate enormous volumes of sequential, timestamped data that must be ingested, stored, and queried with extremely high efficiency. Fleets of vehicles, industrial robots, smart meters, agricultural sensors, and wearable medical devices all continuously emit streams of metrics—often multiple readings per second per device. This results in billions or even trillions of rows over time, forming a dataset where writes dominate and where queries frequently focus on the most recent intervals. Under these conditions, the storage system must handle high throughput, sustain predictable low latency, and scale seamlessly as more devices come online. Bigtable is uniquely designed for this type of workload, making it the most effective choice for IoT telemetry at scale.

Bigtable is a wide-column, sparsely populated, distributed NoSQL database built for massive throughput and near-linear scalability. Its architecture is optimized around storing ordered key-value pairs, where row keys determine data locality. This is especially advantageous for time-series telemetry, where composite row keys—combining device IDs with timestamps—allow for highly efficient range scans. Data written for each device is kept in lexicographical order, enabling rapid retrieval of recent values without scanning unrelated rows. Furthermore, Bigtable’s design separates storage from compute, allowing clusters to grow as workloads increase. Since it distributes data automatically across nodes, it can absorb high write volumes with minimal operational intervention.

One of the most powerful attributes of Bigtable is its low-latency performance at scale. Even when storing petabytes of data, it maintains millisecond-level response times for writes and reads. This is crucial for applications such as real-time fleet tracking, adaptive routing, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance. IoT platforms often need to process incoming telemetry using Dataflow pipelines—enriching data, performing transformations, and routing processed streams to downstream systems. Bigtable integrates tightly with Dataflow, enabling large-scale stream processing and extraction of features for machine learning models. In addition, data stored in Bigtable can be periodically exported into BigQuery for batch analytics, dashboards, and trend detection. This ecosystem of services makes it ideal for building end-to-end IoT systems.

By contrast, Firestore is designed for hierarchical document structures, real-time synchronization across clients, and mobile/web applications. Although it scales well for user-driven workloads, it is not suited for extremely high write velocities or large sequential time-series datasets. Firestore also cannot support the predictable throughput needed for global fleets or millions of concurrently active devices. Cloud SQL, as a relational database, faces bottlenecks when dealing with continuous ingest rates that exceed the capacity of a single-node architecture. Scaling Cloud SQL horizontally requires application-level sharding, which adds operational complexity and limits flexibility. Memorystore, while capable of extremely low-latency access, is an in-memory cache rather than a long-term storage solution. It is not intended for durable storage, nor does it offer cost-effective capacity for storing years of telemetry.

Bigtable’s advantages extend beyond raw performance. It supports seamless schema evolution, allowing developers to add new metrics without restructuring tables. Its automatic replication and backup features support business continuity, ensuring resilience even at immense scales. For machine learning use cases—such as predicting maintenance needs or optimizing routes—Bigtable serves as an excellent source of labeled historical data. The ability to perform rolling writes and targeted queries makes it indispensable for models that depend on sequential sensor readings.

Ultimately, IoT telemetry systems demand a database that excels at high-throughput writes, low-latency range scans, horizontal scalability, and integration with processing and analytics tools. Bigtable meets all these requirements and provides the reliability and performance essential for mission-critical IoT platforms.

Question 109:

A healthcare provider wants to store patient records in a relational database with automatic encryption, backups, and point-in-time recovery. Which service should they choose?

A) Cloud SQL
B) Bigtable
C) Firestore
D) Cloud Spanner

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Healthcare systems generate large volumes of structured information that must be stored with reliability, consistency, and strict adherence to regulatory frameworks. These datasets typically include patient demographics, medical histories, diagnostic records, lab results, prescriptions, physician notes, billing information, and hospital operational data. All of these require strong transactional guarantees to prevent conflicts, corruption, or partial updates, especially when multiple clinicians or systems access the same patient record simultaneously. Cloud SQL, being a fully managed relational database, provides a stable environment for enforcing ACID properties, ensuring that every transaction is executed reliably and consistently. This is crucial in medical environments where outdated, inconsistent, or incorrect data can lead to severe patient safety issues.

Cloud SQL also supports well-known relational engines such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server. This compatibility allows healthcare organizations to migrate legacy workloads without significant redesign or retraining of staff. Many electronic health record (EHR) systems rely on relational schemas, stored procedures, and referential constraints to maintain relationships among patient data. Cloud SQL maintains these relational models natively, enabling seamless integration with existing healthcare applications, clinical workflows, and third-party systems such as insurance platforms, appointment schedulers, and pharmacy networks.

Security and compliance are paramount in any healthcare system. Cloud SQL automatically encrypts data at rest using Google-managed or customer-managed encryption keys, ensuring that sensitive patient data remains protected. Encryption in transit ensures secure communication between application servers and the database. These capabilities help organizations meet HIPAA, HITRUST, and other industry compliance requirements. Cloud SQL’s integration with IAM provides fine-grained access control, enabling administrators to define which users or service accounts can connect to the database, what operations they can perform, and from where. This ensures that unauthorized access is minimized and that access patterns can be audited when required.

Automatic backups and point-in-time recovery add another layer of security and resilience. Healthcare organizations cannot afford data loss: losing even a small number of patient records can create severe risks and regulatory violations. Cloud SQL maintains frequent backups and allows quick restoration to a precise timestamp in case of accidental deletion, corruption, or application bugs. This operational safety net is crucial for maintaining system reliability in mission-critical healthcare environments where outages are unacceptable.

While Bigtable and Firestore are powerful in their respective domains, they do not provide the structured relational consistency healthcare workloads demand. Bigtable excels in high-speed analytics, time-series ingestion, and massive scalability, but it lacks SQL compatibility and strong relational constraints. It cannot guarantee the atomicity required to ensure that a patient’s multiple record updates—such as vital signs, test results, and medication orders—are saved together in a single transaction. Firestore, while flexible and great for mobile synchronization, is document-oriented and lacks the complex join and relational integrity capabilities needed for clinical data models.

Cloud Spanner, on the other hand, offers global consistency and near-infinite scalability. However, most healthcare systems are not globally distributed in a way that necessitates Spanner’s scale. Many healthcare organizations operate regionally or nationally, using centralized data centers or regional clusters. Implementing Spanner introduces additional cost, architectural changes, and operational considerations that may not offer tangible benefits for typical EHR workloads. For most hospitals or clinics, Cloud SQL offers more than enough performance and scalability while remaining simpler to manage and more cost-effective.

Cloud SQL also integrates seamlessly with tools used in healthcare analytics and reporting. Business intelligence teams can connect Cloud SQL to Looker, BigQuery federated queries, or data pipelines that prepare operational dashboards. This enables clinicians, administrators, and compliance officers to gain insights into patient outcomes, appointment patterns, hospital capacity, or billing performance without migrating data to separate systems. The relational structure makes reporting predictable, accurate, and aligned with regulatory documentation standards.

In summary, Cloud SQL strikes the perfect balance for healthcare workloads: strong consistency, relational modeling, automated operations, built-in security controls, compliance features, reliable backups, and ease of integration with existing solutions. It aligns naturally with how healthcare data is structured and accessed, offering the safety and reliability required by hospitals, clinics, and research institutions. For these reasons, Cloud SQL remains the most suitable and practical choice for healthcare record storage.

Question110:

A gaming platform wants to store real-time player state, achievements, and leaderboards with millisecond latency and strong consistency. Which database should they use?

A) Firestore
B) Bigtable
C) Cloud SQL
D) Cloud Spanner

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Real-time gaming systems demand a backend that can seamlessly handle fluctuating workloads, unpredictable user spikes, and dynamic content updates without compromising performance. Player interactions—such as movement tracking, matchmaking, inventory updates, and achievement unlocking—occur continuously and must be processed in milliseconds to maintain gameplay fluidity. Firestore’s architecture, designed for low-latency document reads and writes, aligns perfectly with these requirements. Its hierarchical structure enables developers to model complex player state in an intuitive way: collections for players, subcollections for sessions, inventories, friends, and achievements. This flexibility allows game designers to evolve data models over time without costly migrations.

Another critical requirement in gaming is synchronization across devices. Modern gamers expect a seamless experience whether they switch from mobile to desktop or resume gameplay after network interruptions. Firestore includes built-in real-time listeners that push updates to connected clients instantly, eliminating the need for constant polling. Its offline persistence ensures that temporary connectivity issues do not interrupt gameplay—players can continue interacting with the game, and their data syncs automatically when they reconnect. This capability is essential for mobile-first gaming, where network reliability varies greatly among users.

Firestore also provides strong consistency at the document level, guaranteeing that updates to player state—such as health, currency, or inventory items—are applied atomically. This prevents situations where players could exploit race conditions or corrupted states, which is especially important in competitive gaming environments. Additionally, Firestore supports batched writes and transactions for situations where multiple related updates must occur together, such as awarding items after a completed mission or updating leaderboard values.

While Bigtable offers massive scalability, high throughput, and low latency, its row-based wide-column design is optimized for analytical workloads such as telemetry, logging, and time-series data. It does not natively handle structured, hierarchical, per-user records with rich subdocuments. Moreover, its eventual consistency and lack of native real-time synchronization make it unsuitable for gameplay-critical operations where missing or outdated state can break the user experience.

Cloud SQL, on the other hand, provides strong ACID guarantees but lacks horizontal elasticity. A global gaming platform with millions of simultaneous players can quickly overwhelm traditional relational infrastructure, causing increased latency or requiring manual sharding—an operational burden that complicates development and maintenance. Cloud SQL’s vertically scaled architecture is simply not intended for ultra-high-concurrency, low-latency workloads.

Cloud Spanner delivers global scaling and strong consistency but is optimized for enterprise transactional workloads such as financial systems or multi-region business applications. Its operational overhead, higher cost, and schema rigidity make it unnecessary for the lightweight, player-centric data models typically used in real-time games.

Firestore strikes the perfect balance by combining scalability, ease of use, flexible schema design, automatic multi-region replication, and real-time synchronization. Its serverless nature eliminates infrastructure management, letting developers focus on gameplay logic and user experience. Firestore’s performance and developer-friendly API make it the best-suited database for real-time gaming backends that demand speed, reliability, and agility.

Question 111:

A transportation company wants to process vehicle location updates in real time, enrich them with metadata, and store results for dashboards. Which architecture is best?

A) Pub/Sub → Dataflow → Bigtable
B) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery
C) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → Cloud SQL
D) Memorystore → Compute Engine → Cloud Storage

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Vehicle telemetry generates continuous, high-frequency updates from hundreds or thousands of moving vehicles. These updates may include GPS coordinates, speed, engine telemetry, and other sensor data. The system must ingest this data reliably, perform real-time enrichment or aggregation, and store it in a format suitable for dashboards, analytics, or further processing.

Pub/Sub acts as the ingestion layer, providing scalable, durable, and highly available messaging for streaming data. It decouples producers (vehicles or edge devices) from consumers (processing pipelines), allowing the system to handle spikes in telemetry without data loss. Pub/Sub ensures exactly-once delivery semantics when integrated with downstream services like Dataflow, which is essential for accurate vehicle tracking and analytics.

Dataflow enables real-time processing pipelines that can enrich raw telemetry with metadata such as driver IDs, route information, or maintenance statuses. It supports windowing, aggregation, filtering, and transformation of streams, providing the flexibility to implement complex business logic in real time. Unlike batch-oriented processing, Dataflow can handle high-throughput continuous streams with low latency, ensuring dashboards reflect near-instantaneous vehicle positions.

Bigtable serves as the storage layer optimized for low-latency reads and writes, supporting time-series or key-based queries efficiently. Dashboards and operational teams can query current or historical vehicle locations, generate heat maps, and detect anomalies without performance bottlenecks. Its ability to scale horizontally ensures that the system can handle increasing data volumes as the fleet grows.

Other architectures fall short: Cloud SQL cannot handle massive ingestion rates for real-time telemetry. Cloud Functions are stateless and unsuitable for long-running, continuous stream processing. Batch pipelines like Dataproc introduce latency, making them unfit for near-real-time requirements. In-memory caches such as Memorystore cannot provide durable storage for high-volume, long-lived telemetry data.

By combining Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and Bigtable, organizations achieve a fully managed, end-to-end real-time streaming solution that ensures reliable ingestion, scalable processing, and low-latency querying. This architecture is ideal for transportation analytics, route optimization, and operational monitoring.

Question 112:

A biotech lab wants to run large-scale genomic pipelines on containers using preemptible VMs to reduce cost. Which service should they use?

A) Cloud Run
B) Cloud Batch
C) Cloud Functions
D) App Engine

Answer: B)

Explanation:

Genomic workflows are compute-intensive, often requiring large numbers of CPU or GPU cores for tasks like sequence alignment, variant calling, or genome assembly. Input datasets can be massive, reaching terabytes or even petabytes, and pipelines frequently involve multiple dependent stages. Cost control is important for research labs, which makes preemptible VMs an attractive option.

Cloud Batch orchestrates containerized workloads on compute instances efficiently, handling dependency management, retries, and parallel execution. It can schedule large numbers of containerized tasks, distributing them across preemptible or on-demand VMs, thereby reducing operational costs while ensuring high throughput. Cloud Batch also integrates with Cloud Storage for input/output datasets, ensuring a seamless data flow for complex pipelines.

Cloud Run is intended for lightweight, stateless container workloads and cannot support long-running genomics jobs. Cloud Functions are short-lived and event-driven, making them unsuitable for computationally intensive pipelines. App Engine provides a PaaS environment for web applications but lacks the flexibility and resources required for HPC-style genomic workloads.

Cloud Batch provides automation, fault tolerance, and resource efficiency, allowing research teams to focus on analysis rather than infrastructure management. It also offers monitoring, logging, and easy scaling of computational resources, which is essential for high-throughput genomic processing.

By using Cloud Batch, biotech labs can run pipelines efficiently, reduce costs, and maintain reproducibility. It is the optimal choice for orchestrating large-scale containerized genomic computations.

Question 113:

A logistics company needs a globally distributed relational database for session data, inventory, and order tracking, ensuring strong consistency across regions. Which service should they use?

Answer: B) Cloud Spanner

Expanded Explanation:

Global consistency ensures that users accessing a distributed system from different regions always see the same data, which is critical for inventory management, order tracking, and session data. Cloud Spanner provides horizontal scaling while maintaining strong consistency and ACID transactions across multiple regions.

Cloud SQL is limited to regional deployments and cannot scale globally without complex sharding. Firestore is a document-oriented NoSQL database that lacks relational joins, making it unsuitable for transactional workloads requiring complex queries. Bigtable excels at time-series and analytical workloads but does not provide relational features or transactional consistency.

Cloud Spanner’s globally distributed architecture allows a single logical database to be accessed from multiple continents with consistent transactional behavior. It supports SQL queries, relational data models, and automated replication. This ensures seamless user experience, prevents inventory mismatches, and enables real-time session consistency.

For logistics companies managing global operations, Cloud Spanner provides both operational simplicity and the reliability required for mission-critical, globally distributed transactional workloads.

Question 113:

A logistics company needs a globally distributed relational database for session data, inventory, and order tracking, ensuring strong consistency across regions. Which service should they use?

A) Cloud SQL
B) Cloud Spanner
C) Firestore
D) Bigtable

Answer: B)

Explanation:

For logistics companies managing global operations, Cloud Spanner provides both operational simplicity and the reliability required for mission-critical, globally distributed transactional workloads.

Question 114:

A retail company wants to analyze petabytes of sales data using SQL without managing infrastructure. Which service should they use?

A) BigQuery
B) Cloud SQL
C) Dataproc
D) Firestore

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Retail companies generate enormous volumes of sales data daily, including transaction records, customer interactions, inventory changes, and website clickstreams. Analyzing such large datasets requires a system that can scale automatically, handle complex queries, and integrate with analytics or machine learning pipelines. BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse optimized for petabyte-scale analytics.

BigQuery separates storage and compute, allowing it to automatically scale resources based on query load. This architecture enables organizations to run multiple concurrent SQL queries without performance degradation, a critical feature for high-volume retail data analysis. Analysts can perform complex aggregations, joins, and window functions on historical and real-time datasets, making it ideal for generating dashboards, sales trends, and predictive analytics.

Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads and cannot efficiently handle petabyte-scale datasets. Dataproc provides managed Hadoop or Spark clusters for batch processing but requires cluster provisioning, tuning, and ongoing maintenance, which adds operational complexity and delays. Firestore is a NoSQL document database, excellent for structured application data, but it is not optimized for large-scale analytical queries using SQL.

BigQuery supports streaming ingestion, enabling real-time analytics as sales events occur. It integrates with visualization tools like Looker or Data Studio, allowing business teams to monitor KPIs, sales performance, and customer behavior in near real time. Its built-in support for machine learning models (via BigQuery ML) allows predictive modeling without moving data to external environments.

Additionally, BigQuery’s cost model—pay-per-query—provides operational efficiency and flexibility. There’s no need to manage clusters or worry about scaling infrastructure, and queries can be optimized through partitioning, clustering, and caching. For a retail company, this combination of scalability, real-time capabilities, SQL support, and low administrative overhead makes BigQuery the ideal choice for analyzing massive sales data efficiently and effectively.

Question 115:

A gaming company wants to detect in-game cheating in real time by analyzing player actions streams. Which architecture is best?

A) Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery
B) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → Cloud Storage
C) Memorystore → Compute Engine → BigQuery
D) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Real-time cheat detection requires ingesting high-velocity player event streams, processing them to identify suspicious patterns, and storing results for immediate reporting and long-term analysis. Pub/Sub provides a reliable, horizontally scalable messaging layer capable of ingesting millions of events per second. It ensures messages are delivered efficiently from gaming clients to processing pipelines.

Dataflow enables real-time transformations, aggregations, anomaly detection, and filtering of incoming events. For example, if a player performs actions at impossible speeds or outside normal gameplay patterns, Dataflow can flag and enrich those events with metadata for further investigation. This capability is essential for large-scale games with millions of concurrent players where manual monitoring is impossible.

BigQuery stores aggregated results and historical data, allowing analytics teams to perform post-event investigations, generate dashboards for monitoring, and train machine learning models to identify cheating patterns. By combining streaming ingestion with scalable processing and analytics storage, the pipeline ensures low-latency detection and historical insight.

Alternative architectures fall short: Cloud SQL is limited by write throughput and cannot scale to millions of simultaneous events. Cloud Functions cannot perform long-running streaming analytics. In-memory caches like Memorystore are ephemeral and cannot persist the data for auditing or machine learning purposes. Batch processing systems like Dataproc are too slow to detect cheating in real time.

The Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery architecture provides a fully managed, scalable, and reliable solution, enabling the gaming company to detect cheating events in near real time while maintaining historical data for analysis, compliance, and fairness monitoring.

Question116:

A logistics company wants to store telemetry data from trucks in a NoSQL database optimized for time-series queries. Which database should they choose?

A) Cloud SQL
B) Firestore
C) Bigtable
D) Cloud Spanner

Answer: C)

Explanation:

Vehicle telemetry generates high-frequency, sequential time-series data, including GPS coordinates, speed, engine metrics, and environmental sensor readings. The database must support high write throughput, low-latency queries, and the ability to scale horizontally as the fleet grows. Bigtable is a wide-column NoSQL database specifically optimized for such workloads.

Bigtable provides efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data through row key design, which can incorporate vehicle ID and timestamps to allow fast range queries. This enables dashboards and operational systems to quickly access recent telemetry or perform historical analytics for route optimization, predictive maintenance, and fleet management.

Cloud SQL cannot scale efficiently for millions of events per second due to relational constraints. Firestore, while excellent for hierarchical application data and real-time synchronization, does not handle massive, sequential time-series writes efficiently. Cloud Spanner is a globally distributed relational database, which provides strong consistency and transactional integrity, but is overkill for telemetry workloads that require high write throughput and sequential access patterns.

Bigtable integrates seamlessly with Dataflow for preprocessing, BigQuery for analytics, and monitoring tools for operational visibility. Its ability to scale horizontally means the database can grow with the fleet without performance degradation. Automatic sharding, replication, and consistent low-latency performance make it ideal for both ingestion and querying of time-series telemetry data.

For a logistics company monitoring thousands of trucks, Bigtable ensures real-time visibility, historical analytics, and operational efficiency. It combines scalability, low latency, and reliability, making it the optimal solution for IoT telemetry storage and analysis.

Question117:

A healthcare company needs a database for patient records with relational structure, strong security, automatic backups, and point-in-time recovery. Which service should they use?

A) Cloud SQL
B) Firestore
C) Bigtable
D) Cloud Spanner

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Healthcare applications must meet stringent requirements around data integrity, reliability, regulatory compliance, and predictable transactional behavior. Patient records, clinical workflows, scheduling systems, prescription management, and billing processes all rely on strongly consistent relational data structures. Because these systems directly affect patient care, any data corruption, loss, or inconsistency can have severe consequences. For these reasons, a database supporting ACID transactions with a clearly defined relational schema is essential. Cloud SQL is specifically designed to meet these requirements while minimizing operational complexity for healthcare organizations.

Cloud SQL provides a familiar relational environment based on widely used engines such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server. These engines offer mature and robust support for ACID properties—ensuring that each transaction executes reliably, consistently, and safely, even under high concurrency. Healthcare records often involve interconnected tables and enforce strict referential integrity. Cloud SQL’s structured schema capabilities make it easy to enforce these constraints, allowing systems like electronic health records (EHRs) and health information systems (HIS) to maintain a clean and consistent data model. Such structure is critical for maintaining accurate patient data, linking clinical history, managing medication interactions, and ensuring repeatable workflows.

Beyond relational integrity, security and compliance are major concerns in healthcare. Cloud SQL supports HIPAA compliance, including encryption at rest and in transit, automated backups, and the ability to store audit logs for tracking access patterns. Automated backups and point-in-time recovery ensure that clinical applications can recover quickly from accidental data manipulation or system failures. The ability to place Cloud SQL instances inside private VPCs and restrict access using IAM provides strong isolation and least-privilege enforcement—critical for preventing unauthorized access to sensitive patient information.

In contrast, Firestore—though powerful for mobile or real-time applications—uses a flexible document model without enforced relational constraints. Healthcare systems that require strict relationships between tables, transactional guarantees, or multi-step workflows with rollbacks would find this model insufficient. Bigtable, as a wide-column NoSQL store, is excellent for large-scale analytics or time-series data such as device telemetry but does not support SQL semantics, foreign keys, or ACID transactions. It is optimized for high throughput rather than relational integrity.

Cloud Spanner, while fully managed, globally distributed, and strongly consistent, is generally suited for extraordinarily large-scale transactional workloads—such as global financial systems or multi-region inventory management. For typical healthcare applications that operate within a single region and serve controlled volumes of clinical data, Spanner’s complexity and cost would outweigh its benefits. Most healthcare organizations do not require globally distributed writes or massive horizontal scaling. Cloud SQL provides the necessary performance with lower operational and financial overhead.

Cloud SQL also integrates well with analytics pipelines, allowing patient data to be securely exported to BigQuery for population health analytics, machine learning models, or regulatory reporting. This hybrid approach preserves strong transactional guarantees in operational systems while enabling advanced analytics in downstream systems.

In short, Cloud SQL is optimized for healthcare’s core requirements: structured relational data, strict transactional integrity, robust compliance controls, and seamless integration with secure cloud infrastructure. It offers a balance of reliability, familiarity, and regulatory alignment that is essential for sensitive patient data.

Question118:

A mobile gaming company needs low-latency storage for player state, achievements, and leaderboards with strong consistency. Which database should they choose?

A) Firestore
B) Cloud SQL
C) Bigtable
D) Cloud Spanner

Answer: A)

Explanation:

Realtime gaming systems depend on extremely fast, synchronized data updates to keep players’ experiences responsive and fair. In multiplayer environments—whether competitive shooters, collaborative building games, or real-time role-playing scenarios—every millisecond counts. To support these conditions, the underlying data platform must provide low latency, horizontal scalability, strong consistency where needed, and the ability to handle rapidly changing player states, inventory data, match statistics, leaderboards, and in-game world updates. Firestore offers all of these capabilities while minimizing operational overhead, making it ideally suited for modern gaming workloads.

Firestore is a fully managed NoSQL document database that supports millisecond-level reads and writes, enabling lightning-fast state updates across thousands or millions of connected clients. Its document-level strong consistency guarantees that all players see the most up-to-date information without stale reads or synchronization delays. For fast-paced games, this is crucial: inconsistent data could lead to unfair gameplay, desynchronization, or user frustration. Firestore’s real-time listeners allow devices to receive updates automatically the moment data changes, eliminating the need for polling and enabling near-instant propagation of game events, player movements, and world changes.

Another significant advantage is Firestore’s flexible schema. Gaming environments are dynamic and often evolve quickly: new characters, weapons, maps, scoring mechanics, or progression systems must be added without rigid database migrations. Firestore’s document-based structure allows developers to modify data models on the fly. This ability accelerates feature development and supports continuous updates without disrupting players.

Firestore also excels in mobile and cross-platform gaming environments. It provides built-in offline support, allowing players to continue interacting with certain game features even when their network connection becomes intermittent. Once the device reconnects, Firestore seamlessly synchronizes local changes with the cloud. This enhances user experience and prevents data loss, which is especially valuable for globally distributed player bases using inconsistent mobile networks.

In comparison, Cloud SQL—while powerful for relational workloads—cannot scale to millions of concurrent read/write operations without significant sharding, caching layers, or operational complexity. Relational schemas also make rapid iteration harder for game development teams.

Cloud Bigtable, though highly scalable and perfect for time-series telemetry or analytics pipelines, is not optimized for low-latency real-time updates across individual players. It lacks the real-time listeners and client SDK support that Firestore provides. Bigtable works well for storing aggregated player metrics or event logs, but not for live interactive gameplay.

Cloud Spanner, while globally distributed and strongly consistent, is significantly more expensive and targeted at mission-critical transactional workloads requiring horizontal scale and high transactional throughput. Most gaming applications do not require the full relational consistency guarantees that Spanner provides. For typical player sessions, matchmaking, or item inventories, Firestore is more cost-effective and simpler to manage.

Firestore strikes the ideal balance: globally scalable, low-latency, developer-friendly, and tightly integrated with mobile and web SDKs. It enables real-time synchronization with minimal overhead, supports flexible data modeling for fast iteration, and eliminates the need to manage servers or complex caching systems. For gaming studios building responsive multiplayer experiences, Firestore offers the best combination of performance, scalability, and ease of development.

Question119:

A media platform wants to process millions of user events per second for personalization. Which architecture should they use?

A) Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery
B) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → Cloud Storage
C) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → Cloud SQL
D) Memorystore → Compute Engine → Cloud Storage

Answer: A)

Explanation:

High-velocity user event ingestion is a foundational requirement for modern digital platforms—whether in e-commerce, gaming, ad-tech, social media, IoT, or financial services. Such environments generate millions or even billions of events per day, often requiring processing within seconds or milliseconds. These events include clicks, transactions, page views, sensor readings, in-app behaviors, or telemetry from distributed systems. To handle this volume and velocity, the architecture must support horizontal scaling, low-latency processing, fault tolerance, and real-time analytics integration—all without operational bottlenecks. The Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery pipeline meets these requirements more effectively than any alternative architecture available in Google Cloud.

Pub/Sub serves as the ingestion backbone, capable of handling millions of events per second with global distribution and high durability. It decouples producers and consumers, ensuring that spikes in event volume never overload downstream systems. Producers can publish messages at any rate, and Pub/Sub guarantees delivery to Dataflow even under heavy load. Retention policies and message ordering capabilities help ensure consistent processing. Because Pub/Sub is fully managed and automatically scales, it eliminates the operational challenges traditionally associated with message queuing systems.

Once events are ingested, Dataflow performs real-time transformation, enrichment, deduplication, windowing, and aggregation. Built on Apache Beam, Dataflow supports both streaming and batch processing, but its streaming capabilities are particularly powerful for event-driven architectures. For example, user events can be correlated across time windows to detect fraud patterns, generate personalized recommendations, compute metrics such as DAUs/MAUs, or track user journeys in real time. Dataflow’s autoscaling enables it to react dynamically to traffic surges, while its exactly-once processing guarantees prevent data loss or duplication—a critical requirement for analytics and machine learning pipelines.

Furthermore, Dataflow’s tight integration with Pub/Sub allows messages to be consumed instantly, often within milliseconds of publication. Complex operations—such as joining event streams with reference data, enriching events with user profiles, or aggregating sequences of actions—become straightforward. Built-in monitoring, autoscaling, and fault tolerance mean that large-scale streaming jobs remain stable without manual intervention. Dataflow also ensures separation of compute and persistence, reducing costs by scaling down automatically during periods of lower activity.

BigQuery serves as the analytical storage layer where processed data lands. It is optimized for real-time ingestion via BigQuery Streaming API or Dataflow’s native sinks. Once data is available in BigQuery, it becomes immediately queryable, supporting near–real-time dashboards, anomaly detection, operational analytics, business intelligence reporting, and machine learning model retraining using BigQuery ML. BigQuery’s columnar storage, massive parallel execution engine, and serverless scaling allow organizations to query terabytes or petabytes of streaming data with sub-second latency. This makes it ideal for powering live dashboards, financial risk engines, recommendation systems, and large-scale data science initiatives.

Alternative architectures lack one or more of these capabilities. For instance, Cloud Functions cannot support high-throughput streaming transformations. Cloud Run can ingest streams but lacks native windowing, checkpointing, and fault tolerance for real-time pipelines. Dataproc requires manual cluster management and does not match Dataflow’s elasticity or operational simplicity for streaming workloads. Direct ingestion into BigQuery without Dataflow limits the ability to transform or enrich events in real time.

The Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery pattern provides an end-to-end, fully managed streaming analytics solution with no servers to manage, infinite scalability, and built-in reliability. It is the ideal architecture for organizations that require real-time insights, event-driven workflows, machine learning feedback loops, and immediate operational visibility.

Question120:

A biotech company wants to run containerized ML pipelines for genomics using preemptible VMs to reduce cost. Which service should they use?

A) Cloud Run
B) Cloud Batch
C) Cloud Functions
D) App Engine

Answer: B)

Explanation:

Genomics workloads are among the most computationally demanding tasks in the life sciences. They often involve processing terabytes of raw sequencing data, executing many parallelizable steps such as alignment, variant calling, quality control, annotation, and downstream statistical analysis. Each stage may require high memory, intensive CPU utilization, and long execution time. Because genomics pipelines consist of numerous interdependent tasks, each with different resource requirements, they benefit from an execution environment that supports distributed computing at scale. This is precisely where Cloud Batch excels.

Cloud Batch is designed to orchestrate large numbers of batch jobs efficiently across distributed compute resources. It allows organizations to define jobs as containerized tasks, making it easy to package genomics tools such as GATK, BWA, Samtools, Nextflow modules, or other specialized bioinformatics applications in Docker containers. By running these containers on managed compute instances, Cloud Batch ensures reproducibility, isolation, and consistent performance. It supports running workloads that take hours or even days, something that event-driven or short-lived compute services cannot support.

A significant advantage of Cloud Batch is its integration with preemptible VMs. Genomics pipelines often consist of thousands of parallelizable tasks that do not require continuous machine uptime. Preemptible VMs offer up to 80% cost savings compared to standard VMs, and Cloud Batch automatically handles retries when instances are preempted. This allows research organizations, universities, and biotech companies to run massive analyses at a fraction of the cost normally required. Cloud Batch also provides job-level and task-level retry logic, ensuring that interrupted steps are automatically restarted without manual intervention.

Dependency management is another critical component of complex genomics pipelines. Many workflows require certain steps to finish before the next stage can begin. Cloud Batch enables users to define dependencies between tasks, creating structured pipelines that execute in correct order. This ensures workflows behave consistently and reduces pipeline management overhead. Combined with automatic scaling, Cloud Batch provisions the exact amount of compute needed for each stage of the workflow, scaling up during heavy computational phases and scaling down once tasks complete—optimizing both performance and cost.

In contrast, Cloud Run is optimized for stateless, request-driven applications that respond to HTTP requests and scale to zero during inactivity. It is not designed for high-memory jobs, long-running compute tasks, or intricate multi-step pipelines. Cloud Functions is even more limited in this context: it is event-driven, supports short execution times, and cannot handle long-running analytical workloads or large genomics datasets. App Engine provides managed hosting for web applications but is not suited for distributed HPC-style workflows or large-scale scientific workloads.

Cloud Batch also integrates seamlessly with other GCP services used in genomics research, such as Cloud Storage for storing sequence data, Filestore for shared high-throughput POSIX file access, and BigQuery or Vertex AI for downstream analysis. This makes it an ideal backbone for an end-to-end genomics processing ecosystem. Its minimal operational overhead means researchers can focus on scientific discovery rather than infrastructure management.

For organizations processing whole-genome sequencing, RNA-seq pipelines, or population-scale genetic studies, Cloud Batch provides the right balance of power, scalability, reliability, and cost control. Its capabilities align naturally with the computational patterns of genomics workloads. Therefore, it is the optimal choice for executing large, containerized, highly parallel genomics pipelines in the cloud.

Google Professional Cloud Architect on Google Cloud Platform Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q106-120

Related posts: