Microsoft SC-401 Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 1 Q1-15

Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-401 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 1:

 You need to ensure that sensitive documents across Microsoft 365 are automatically classified and protected without user intervention. Which feature should you implement?

A) Data Loss Prevention
B) Sensitivity Labels with Auto-Labeling
C) Insider Risk Policies
D) Retention Labels

Answer: B

Explanation:

 Data Loss Prevention is designed primarily to detect sensitive information as it is shared or moved and can block, warn, or log activities based on predefined rules. Although it plays an important role in preventing information leakage, it does not classify content for long-term protection. It focuses on actions that involve sharing or transmitting data rather than labeling and protecting stored content consistently across Microsoft 365 applications.

Sensitivity Labels with Auto-Labeling provide the capability to automatically classify and protect documents and emails containing sensitive data. Machine-based inspection of content allows these labels to be applied without user involvement. The system evaluates conditions such as sensitive information types, trainable classifiers, or keyword matches and then applies labels configured with encryption, access restrictions, visual markings, or metadata. This capability ensures consistent and automated protection across workspaces, which is essential for organizations needing scalable and tamper-resistant enforcement of classification rules. Auto-labeling works in SharePoint, OneDrive, Exchange, and Office apps, making it well-suited for broad enterprise-wide deployment.

Insider Risk Policies provide detection and analytics related to risky or suspicious user behaviors such as data exfiltration, unauthorized copying, or actions that may signal internal threats. While these policies are extremely valuable in identifying misuse of sensitive content, they do not automatically classify or protect documents based on detected content. They are analytical rather than preventive from the perspective of labeling or consistent security enforcement.

Retention Labels are focused on the lifecycle governance of documents and emails. They determine how long data should be stored and what should happen to it after the retention period ends. Although some retention labels can be associated with classification, their primary function is not content protection or encryption. They are used to comply with regulatory, legal, or organizational data retention standards.

Sensitivity Labels with Auto-Labeling serve the requirement most directly because they classify and protect content automatically. Their automation ensures that labeling is not dependent on manual selection by end users, creating both consistency and reliability. By using auto-labeling, organizations ensure sensitive data receives appropriate protection at the moment it is created or detected, making it the best-fit answer for the requirement.

Question 2:

You need to enforce access to Microsoft 365 resources only when devices meet corporate compliance requirements. What should you configure?

A) Conditional Access
B) Privileged Access Management
C) Access Reviews
D) Customer Lockbox

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Conditional Access evaluates signals such as user identity, device state, risk level, and location during authentication. It enables administrators to enforce rules that allow access only when a device meets specific compliance conditions. If a device is not compliant—perhaps missing encryption, lacking an updated OS, or failing Intune policies—access can be blocked or limited. This solution directly governs access based on device compliance, making it well-suited for strengthening the security posture of Microsoft 365 environments through identity-driven controls.

Privileged Access Management focuses on limiting administrative permissions and controlling sensitive operations. It is designed to reduce high-risk privilege use rather than validating device compliance for all users. It does not evaluate the health of user devices or block access to standard applications based on compliance state.

Access Reviews help organizations regularly reassess group memberships, application access, and role assignments. They ensure that only appropriate users maintain access, but they do not check device configuration or health before granting resource access.

Customer Lockbox applies to scenarios where Microsoft support personnel need elevated access during troubleshooting. It requires customer approval for such access, but does not evaluate or enforce requirements for user devices within the organization.

Conditional Access is essential for organizations enforcing zero-trust principles. It provides a centralized way to determine when users may access corporate resources, verifying device trustworthiness when authentication attempts occur. By connecting with Intune device compliance policies, Conditional Access can require encryption, endpoint protection status, OS versions, or jailbreak detection before granting resource access. This dynamic and granular control ensures that data remains protected no matter where users sign in. For these reasons, Conditional Access is the correct answer.

Question 3:

Your organization must protect highly confidential documents with encryption that requires two keys—one held by Microsoft and one held by your organization. Which solution should you deploy?

A) Customer Lockbox
B) Customer Key
C) Double Key Encryption
D) Information Barriers

Answer: C

Explanation:

 Customer Lockbox is built to control access by Microsoft support engineers who may need temporary access to customer content for troubleshooting. The solution is not related to document encryption or dual-key protection. Instead, it is focused on ensuring customers approve or deny Microsoft’s support access, providing transparency and control but not encryption.

Customer Key enables organizations to manage their own encryption keys for certain Microsoft 365 data-at-rest scenarios. It offers greater control than default Microsoft-managed encryption, but it does not require two keys to decrypt data. Instead, Customer Key supplements service encryption to enable key revocation and compliance-related obligations, but it does not enforce the dual-key model described in the requirement.

Double Key Encryption (DKE) is an advanced security feature in Microsoft 365 and Azure that provides a highly secure method of protecting sensitive information. Unlike standard encryption methods, which rely on a single key managed by Microsoft or the customer, DKE requires two separate keys to decrypt protected content. One key is securely held by Microsoft, while the second key is controlled exclusively by the customer. This dual-key requirement ensures that neither Microsoft nor any unauthorized party can access the encrypted data independently. Even if a malicious actor were to compromise one key, they would still be unable to decrypt the information without the second key, significantly increasing the protection against data breaches, insider threats, or unauthorized access.

This solution is particularly valuable for organizations subject to strict regulatory, compliance, or sovereignty requirements. For instance, government agencies, financial institutions, or healthcare organizations often handle highly confidential data that cannot be exposed under any circumstances—even to cloud service providers. By implementing Double Key Encryption, these organizations gain confidence that their sensitive documents, emails, and other digital assets remain protected at all times. Moreover, DKE can be applied to Microsoft 365 services such as SharePoint, OneDrive, and Exchange Online, enabling a broad range of protected workflows while maintaining usability for authorized users. Accessing encrypted content requires both the Microsoft key and the customer-held key, which is typically managed through a secure key management system under the organization’s control.

Information Barriers, in contrast, serve a very different purpose within Microsoft 365. They are designed to enforce internal communication policies by restricting collaboration and messaging between defined user groups. For example, they might prevent a trading team from communicating with a research team in a financial institution to comply with regulatory separation rules. While Information Barriers are highly effective for governance, compliance, and mitigating conflict-of-interest risks, they do not provide encryption, key management, or protection of content at the data level. They focus on controlling “who” can communicate or collaborate, not on securing “what” is communicated or stored. Therefore, although Information Barriers enhance compliance and operational governance, they do not meet the stringent security requirements that DKE addresses.

Double Key Encryption directly fulfills the requirement for maximum content security because it ensures that sensitive information remains inaccessible without explicit authorization from both Microsoft and the customer. Its dual-key architecture provides an added layer of assurance for organizations managing top-secret, highly regulated, or mission-critical data. By separating control of the decryption keys, DKE eliminates the risk of unilateral access and reinforces the organization’s ability to comply with the strictest confidentiality standards. Consequently, for scenarios where maximum data protection, regulatory compliance, and customer-controlled encryption are required, Double Key Encryption is the correct solution.

Question 4:

You need to block external sharing of files that contain sensitive data stored in SharePoint and OneDrive. Which feature should you implement?

A) Sensitivity Labels
B) Data Loss Prevention
C) Retention Policies
D) Insider Risk Management

Answer: B

Explanation: 

 Sensitivity Labels classify and protect documents through encryption, marking, or access controls. Although certain label configurations can restrict external sharing, labels themselves do not perform real-time evaluation of user actions in SharePoint or OneDrive. They are applied to content for protection rather than enforcing dynamic rules based on user behavior during sharing attempts.

Data Loss Prevention examines content in real time as users attempt to access, modify, upload, or share sensitive data. DLP policies can detect information such as financial records or personal identifiers within documents stored in SharePoint and OneDrive. When users attempt to share these documents externally, DLP rules can block the action, notify the user, or log the event for reporting. This behavior is consistent with the requirement to prevent the sharing of sensitive data outside the organization.

Retention Policies dictate how long information must be preserved or when it should be deleted. They support organizational compliance obligations related to data life cycles, but do not prevent the sharing of content based on sensitivity. Their role is archival and preservation, not real-time enforcement of external sharing restrictions.

Insider Risk Management (IRM) in Microsoft 365 is a powerful tool for detecting and mitigating potential internal threats. It continuously monitors user behavior patterns across different workloads, analyzing activities such as file access, downloads, sharing, and communications to identify anomalies that may indicate risky behavior. For example, if an employee begins copying large volumes of sensitive documents, accessing files outside of normal work hours, or attempting to share confidential data with unauthorized recipients, IRM can generate alerts for administrators to investigate. This behavioral analysis allows organizations to proactively identify potential insider threats before they escalate into serious incidents.

However, while IRM excels in monitoring and risk detection, it does not directly prevent risky actions from occurring. It functions primarily in an analytical and investigative capacity, providing visibility and actionable insights rather than enforcing real-time restrictions. Users can still copy, download, or share data; IRM simply flags these actions for review. As a result, it is most effective when combined with other security solutions that can enforce policy and control data movement.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP), on the other hand, is specifically designed to address this enforcement gap. DLP evaluates both the content of documents and the context of sharing behaviors in real time. When sensitive information, such as personally identifiable information (PII), financial data, or intellectual property, is detected, DLP can automatically block sharing, restrict access, or require additional authorization before allowing the action to proceed. By preventing sensitive data from leaving the organization without proper controls, DLP ensures proactive protection against data leakage and regulatory violations. For scenarios where preventing unauthorized sharing is critical, DLP is the correct solution, as it combines content awareness with real-time enforcement to safeguard organizational information.

Question 5:

 Your organization wants administrators to be required to justify activating privileged roles. Which capability should you configure?

A) Access Reviews
B) Privileged Identity Management
C) Conditional Access
D) eDiscovery (Premium)

Answer: B

Explanation:

 Access Reviews focus on ensuring that users retain only appropriate access. They allow for periodic verification of memberships, roles, or application permissions. While helpful for ongoing governance, this capability does not require administrators to justify privileged role activation before performing sensitive tasks.

Privileged Identity Management provides just-in-time activation of privileged roles and can require administrators to enter justification before activating a role. It also supports approval workflows, time-bound role activation, and access auditing. This makes it ideal for preventing unnecessary or excessive standing privileges and ensuring that administrators have accountability when performing sensitive operations.

Conditional Access governs authentication and resource access by evaluating factors such as device compliance, user risk, or location. It does not enforce justifications related to administrative role activation or privileged role usage.

eDiscovery (Premium) assists with identifying, preserving, and exporting content for legal or investigative purposes. It is unrelated to requiring justification for administrative role activation and does not manage privileged accounts.

Privileged Identity Management directly satisfies the requirement because it enforces justification and approval mechanisms before privileged roles can be used. This enhances accountability and minimizes risks associated with administrative access, making it the correct answer.

Question 6:

You need to detect and review messages in Microsoft Teams that contain threatening or offensive language. Which solution should you implement?

A) Data Lifecycle Management
B) Communication Compliance
C) Retention Labels
D) Audit Search

Answer: B

Explanation:

 Data Lifecycle Management provides tools for managing the retention, deletion, and archival of information, helping organizations meet regulatory and legal obligations. It governs how long information remains stored, but does not evaluate message content for inappropriate behavior. Because it deals mainly with data durability and disposal rather than communication risk detection, it cannot support the requirement to identify threatening or offensive messages in Teams.

Communication Compliance is designed to analyze communication channels for risky, inappropriate, or policy-violating content. It can review Teams chats, Exchange messages, and other communication methods. Using both predefined and custom classifiers, it identifies harassment, threats, offensive language, or sensitive information being shared. Reviewers can take actions on flagged messages, generate reports, escalate cases, and track remediation. It works in near-real time and is built specifically for internal communication oversight, clearly meeting the need to review and detect offensive Teams messages.

Retention Labels preserve content for specified periods and can trigger deletion or retention based on rules. While important for governance, they do not analyze messages for harmful content. They operate on stored items rather than monitoring live communication. As such, they do not align with requirements involving the detection of harassment or threats within chat messages.

Audit Search provides tracking of user actions across Microsoft 365, such as file access, mailbox activities, and administrative operations. Although useful for forensic investigations, it does not analyze the text of chats or messages to determine whether the content is threatening or offensive. The audit logs do not provide sentiment or behavior analysis, making them insufficient for communication monitoring needs.

Communication Compliance is the correct solution because it detects, flags, and routes inappropriate or threatening messages for review. It supports organizational safety initiatives, helps enforce acceptable-use policies, protects against workplace misconduct, and provides a structured review workflow.

Question 7:

You need to detect potential data exfiltration attempts involving copying sensitive files to removable USB media. Which feature should you configure?

A) Endpoint Data Loss Prevention
B) Insider Risk Management
C) Content Search
D) Sensitivity Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Endpoint Data Loss Prevention monitors device-based activities and identifies when sensitive files are copied to external storage, USB media, or other transfer channels. It applies the same classifications and DLP rules used across cloud environments, enabling real-time enforcement at the device level. It can block copying, alert users, log actions, or audit activity depending on policy configuration. This direct monitoring of USB and removable media activity provides immediate visibility into potential data exfiltration attempts, making it the ideal solution for preventing unauthorized copying of sensitive content onto external devices.

Insider Risk Management identifies behavioral indicators of risky user actions, such as unusual downloads, mass file deletions, or patterns suggesting potential malicious intent. While it offers valuable risk detection and analysis, it does not provide real-time blocking or monitoring of USB activities. Its focus is on analyzing broader behavioral trends rather than enforcing file transfer restrictions at endpoints.

Content Search is part of eDiscovery and helps administrators locate documents, messages, or files across Microsoft 365. However, it cannot detect or track actions at the device level, such as copying files to USB drives. Its function is retrospective search, not real-time monitoring or blocking of file movements.

Sensitivity Labels provide encryption, classification, and usage restrictions for content. They ensure persistent protection but do not monitor device actions. While labels can restrict unauthorized access, they do not inherently detect or block copying files to USB storage unless combined with other systems like Endpoint DLP.

Endpoint Data Loss Prevention is the right solution because it directly monitors device-level file movement and provides the enforcement mechanism needed to detect or block USB-based data exfiltration.

Question 8:

You must ensure that departing employees’ OneDrive files remain preserved for 120 days even after their accounts are removed. What should you use?

A) Retention Policies
B) Sensitivity Label Policies
C) Data Loss Prevention Policies
D) Access Reviews

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Retention Policies ensure that data is preserved for a defined duration regardless of user deletion actions. When a user leaves the organization and their account is removed, their OneDrive storage is normally deleted after a standard retention period. Applying a retention policy overrides this behavior and ensures that the files remain available for the required timeframe, such as 120 days. This supports legal, operational, and compliance needs by guaranteeing that important files remain accessible for review or investigation even after the user has departed.

Sensitivity Label Policies manage automatic or manual application of labels to files and emails for protection and classification. These labels may add encryption, visual markings, or access rules, but they do not govern how long OneDrive files remain stored after a user leaves. They cannot ensure that files remain accessible once the account is deleted.

Data Loss Prevention Policies monitor and restrict the sharing or movement of sensitive information. Although they help prevent data leakage, they do not control data preservation after account deletion. They govern user actions while data exists, not the retention period after offboarding.

Access Reviews verify whether users should continue to have access to applications, groups, or resources. While important for governance, they do not affect the preservation of OneDrive content or dictate how long files persist following user departure.

Retention Policies directly address the requirement by ensuring that content remains available for the specified duration, no matter what happens to the user’s account. For this reason, they are the appropriate choice.

Question 9:

You need to ensure that administrators accessing highly sensitive audit logs must justify proceeding. Which feature supports this requirement?

A) Privileged Access Management
B) Conditional Access
C) Unified Audit Log
D) Microsoft Secure Score

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Privileged Access Management introduces controls for high-risk administrative operations by requiring approval or justification before privileged tasks can be executed. Administrators must request access to perform sensitive actions, and depending on configuration, the system can require them to provide a reason or wait for an approval workflow. This offers protection by preventing immediate execution of sensitive tasks, creating oversight for audit log access, and reducing risk associated with privileged activities.

Conditional Access manages sign-in conditions but does not require justification before executing privileged actions. It evaluates identity, device compliance, location, and risk signals to allow or block access, but does not enforce reason submission for administrative tasks.

Unified Audit Log enables visibility and searchability of logged activities. Although critical for auditing, it does not restrict access to logs or require justification. It is a reporting and investigation tool, not an access-control enforcement mechanism.

Microsoft Secure Score evaluates the security posture of an organization and provides recommendations for improvement. It does not influence privileged task execution or enforce just-in-time access restrictions with justification.

Privileged Access Management is the best fit because it enforces approval and justification workflows for sensitive administrative actions.

Question 10:

Your organization needs to restrict certain groups from communicating or collaborating in Microsoft Teams. Which solution should be used?

A) Information Barriers
B) Data Loss Prevention
C) Communication Compliance
D) Customer Lockbox

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Information Barriers establish communication restrictions between specific groups within an organization. They prevent users from chatting, calling, meeting, or sharing files with users from restricted segments. These barriers are commonly used in industries where separation of roles or departments is required to avoid conflicts of interest or comply with regulatory obligations. They operate at the directory and policy level, ensuring users in blocked segments cannot interact in Microsoft Teams or other supported apps.

Data Loss Prevention identifies and controls sensitive information sharing. It helps prevent data leakage but does not restrict communication between specific user groups. DLP evaluates content rather than organizational boundaries, making it unsuitable for preventing interaction between defined segments.

Communication Compliance in Microsoft 365 is designed to detect inappropriate, offensive, or sensitive communications within the organization. It monitors emails, Teams messages, and other communication channels to identify content that may violate corporate policies, regulatory standards, or ethical guidelines. For example, Communication Compliance can flag harassment, discrimination, or the sharing of sensitive personal information. While it provides advanced content review, reporting, and alerting capabilities, its function is strictly monitoring and detection—it does not actively prevent or block communication between individuals or groups. Users who are part of restricted interactions can still communicate freely; Communication Compliance simply identifies when messages may contain problematic content. Its primary value lies in helping compliance officers, HR teams, or security analysts detect and respond to potential issues after they occur, rather than enforcing structural separation or preventing communications from taking place in the first place.

Customer Lockbox is another Microsoft 365 feature that enhances security and compliance, but it serves a very different purpose. Customer Lockbox ensures that Microsoft support engineers cannot access customer data without explicit approval from the tenant’s administrators. This mechanism protects sensitive organizational data during troubleshooting or support scenarios by providing a controlled access workflow that requires approval for each request. While critical for maintaining trust and data sovereignty, Customer Lockbox does not control the flow of communication or collaboration among users within the tenant. It does not enforce segmentation, prevent certain users from interacting, or monitor internal conversations—it is focused entirely on securing external access to data.

Information Barriers, in contrast, are specifically designed to enforce strict separation of communication and collaboration capabilities between defined organizational groups. They are often used in scenarios where compliance or regulatory requirements dictate that certain departments or teams must remain isolated to prevent conflicts of interest, data leaks, or collusion. For example, a financial services organization might implement Information Barriers to prevent trading teams from communicating with advisory teams, ensuring compliance with SEC regulations. Unlike Communication Compliance, which merely monitors content, Information Barriers actively restrict the ability to send messages, share files, or participate in Teams channels between restricted groups. This structural enforcement ensures that sensitive data and communications remain segmented according to organizational policies.

By enforcing these boundaries, Information Barriers help organizations mitigate risk proactively rather than reactively. They provide clear, policy-driven control over who can collaborate with whom, reducing the likelihood of internal data misuse, regulatory violations, or conflicts of interest. While features like Communication Compliance and Customer Lockbox provide essential monitoring and protection, only Information Barriers deliver the capability to enforce strict separation between organizational segments, making it the correct solution for scenarios requiring controlled communication and collaboration boundaries.

Question 11:

Your organization needs to ensure that users can access Microsoft 365 services only from devices that are hybrid Azure AD-joined or compliant. Which solution should you configure?

A) Authentication Methods Policy
B) Conditional Access Policy
C) Microsoft Defender for Identity
D) Access Reviews

Answer: B

Explanation:

 Authentication Methods Policy controls which types of authentication users can register for or use, such as passwordless options or MFA methods. While this strengthens identity verification, it does not restrict access based on device compliance, nor does it evaluate device state when sign-ins occur. Since it focuses on authentication configuration rather than device trust, it cannot meet the requirement to allow access only from compliant or hybrid Azure AD-joined devices.

Conditional Access Policy evaluates user sign-ins against rules that can include device state, user risk level, location, and session context. Conditional Access integrates with Intune’s device compliance signals and Azure AD device registration information. This allows administrators to require that devices be compliant or hybrid Azure AD joined before users can access Microsoft 365 services. When a device fails to meet these requirements, access can be blocked or challenged. This conditional evaluation directly aligns with the requirement to ensure only trusted devices access cloud resources.

Microsoft Defender for Identity focuses on analyzing on-premises Active Directory signals to detect identity-based threats such as lateral movement, credential theft, and reconnaissance. Though it strengthens security posture, it does not enforce rules that restrict Microsoft 365 access based on device status.

Access Reviews evaluate whether users should maintain specific access rights, such as membership in groups or access to applications. While vital for governance, Access Reviews do not restrict access based on device compliance. They deal with identity governance rather than device-based access control.

Conditional Access is the only solution that fully meets the requirement because it enforces device trust before granting access to cloud apps. It evaluates compliance posture and ensures that only devices meeting organizational policies can authenticate and access services. This ensures strong, identity-centric security while supporting the zero-trust model.

Question 12:

You need to ensure that highly sensitive documents stored in SharePoint cannot be downloaded, printed, or forwarded by unauthorized users. Which feature should you apply?

A) Retention Policies
B) SharePoint Access Requests
C) Sensitivity Labels with Encryption
D) Insider Risk Management

Answer: C

Explanation:

 Retention Policies provide rules for keeping or deleting content for regulatory or legal purposes. While essential for lifecycle management, they do not restrict user actions like downloading or printing documents. These policies govern longevity and preservation rather than rights enforcement on how content can be used.

SharePoint Access Requests allow users to request permission to view content they do not currently have access to. While helpful for workflow-based permission management, this feature does not control what authorized users can do after gaining access. It cannot restrict printing, downloading, or forwarding of files already accessible to a user.

Sensitivity Labels with Encryption protect files by applying restrictions such as preventing printing, blocking copying, requiring authentication, or enforcing read-only access. When a sensitivity label is configured with encryption settings, it enforces usage rights that persist regardless of file location. These labels can prevent unauthorized users from downloading, forwarding, or printing documents. They also integrate with Microsoft 365 applications to ensure rights enforcement in real time. This feature directly addresses the requirement to prevent the misuse of sensitive documents through precise access and usage controls.

Insider Risk Management analyzes patterns of user activity to detect risky or suspicious behavior. While important for understanding potential internal threats, it does not restrict actions such as downloading or printing within SharePoint. It operates analytically, not preventively.

Sensitivity Labels with Encryption best satisfy the requirement because they provide persistent usage restrictions and secure sensitive content no matter where it travels. They ensure that authorized users can only perform permitted actions, thereby offering comprehensive protection.

Question 13:

Your legal department needs the ability to search and preserve content related to an ongoing investigation, including Teams chats, emails, and documents. What should you implement?

A) Content Explorer
B) eDiscovery (Premium) Case
C) Data Loss Prevention
D) Audit Logs

Answer: B

Explanation:

 Content Explorer allows administrators to see where sensitive information resides across Microsoft 365, offering file-level visibility. Although helpful for discovering sensitive data locations, it does not provide legal hold capabilities or investigative workflows. It is designed for data awareness rather than structured legal investigation.

eDiscovery (Premium) Case supports the full investigation lifecycle required by legal teams. It includes tools for searching across Microsoft Teams chats, email messages, documents, and other content. Legal holds preserve content from deletion, ensuring it remains intact while an investigation is ongoing. Review sets, analytics, case management, and export capabilities provide a comprehensive workflow tailored to corporate legal needs. The case-based structure supports documentation, roles, and compliance-oriented processes. Because it covers both discovery and preservation, it perfectly aligns with legal investigation requirements.

Data Loss Prevention focuses on detecting and controlling sensitive information sharing. It prevents leakage but does not support legal holds, case management, or deep investigative searches. Its function is proactive prevention, not legal compliance.

Audit logs are an essential component of security and compliance within Microsoft 365, as they provide a detailed record of user and administrative activities. These logs capture a wide range of actions, such as file access, modifications, sharing activities, mailbox operations, and changes to configuration settings. By recording who did what and when, audit logs offer valuable insights during post-incident investigations, helping organizations understand the sequence of events leading up to a potential breach or compliance issue. They can also be used to generate reports for internal audits or compliance reviews.

However, while audit logs provide visibility into activities, they have significant limitations when it comes to legal or compliance scenarios. Audit logs do not preserve the actual content of communications or documents—they only record metadata about actions performed. This means that while you can see that a document was accessed or modified, you cannot retrieve the original content of the document itself through audit logs. Additionally, audit logs do not support legal holds, which are critical in litigation or regulatory investigations where the preservation of specific data is required. They also lack case-based workflows, which are necessary for managing investigations efficiently, especially when multiple stakeholders are involved. Without these capabilities, audit logs function primarily as a supplementary tool rather than a complete investigative solution.

eDiscovery (Premium) Case addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive platform for managing complex investigations and compliance scenarios. It enables organizations to place content under legal hold, ensuring that emails, documents, Teams messages, and other Microsoft 365 content are preserved immutably until the hold is lifted. eDiscovery Case also offers cross-workload search capabilities, allowing investigators to query multiple sources simultaneously, such as Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams, to locate relevant content quickly. Furthermore, it includes workflow management features for case management, allowing compliance teams to assign tasks, track progress, and export data in a defensible manner for legal proceedings.

In summary, while audit logs are indispensable for monitoring user and admin activities, they are limited to after-the-fact analysis and lack preservation, case management, and cross-workload search capabilities. eDiscovery (Premium) Case is the correct choice for organizations requiring a robust, legally defensible solution to manage investigations, enforce legal holds, and ensure comprehensive content preservation across Microsoft 365.

Question 14:

You need to prevent email messages containing financial information from being sent outside the organization. Which Microsoft 365 feature should you configure?

A) Exchange Transport Rules
B) Communication Compliance
C) Data Loss Prevention
D) Information Barriers

Answer: C

Explanation:

 Exchange Transport Rules allow administrators to configure mail flow actions based on conditions like sender, recipient, or message characteristics. While they can detect certain keywords or metadata, they lack the deep, sensitive information detection used for financial data types such as credit card numbers. They do not provide classification accuracy equal to Microsoft’s sensitive information types and may result in inconsistent enforcement.

Communication Compliance reviews communication content for inappropriate or risky behavior, such as harassment or abusive language. It is focused on internal content monitoring rather than preventing external data leakage. It alerts reviewers rather than enforcing real-time sending restrictions for outbound messages.

Data Loss Prevention analyzes email content using sensitive information types, machine learning classifiers, and rule-based conditions. It can detect financial information such as credit card numbers or bank account details. Policies can block emails before they leave the organization, show policy tips to educate users, or require overrides with justification. This provides precise control over preventing sensitive financial data from being transmitted externally.

Information Barriers are designed to enforce internal communication policies within an organization. They restrict communication and collaboration between specific internal groups, such as separating teams that handle sensitive financial information from those that should not have access due to compliance or conflict-of-interest concerns. For example, investment banking divisions might be restricted from communicating with certain trading teams to comply with regulatory requirements. While Information Barriers are effective for preventing inappropriate internal interactions, they do not analyze the content of messages or block emails based on the presence of sensitive information. Their focus is on segmentation and preventing internal conflicts of interest rather than protecting data from leaving the organization. They do not have mechanisms to detect or enforce rules around specific types of sensitive content, such as financial statements, personal data, or intellectual property.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP), by contrast, is specifically built to identify and protect sensitive information, whether it exists inside emails, attachments, or documents. DLP policies can scan message content in real time, looking for patterns that match predefined sensitive data types, such as credit card numbers, social security numbers, or proprietary financial information. Once such content is detected, DLP can enforce rules to prevent the information from leaving the organization via email or other communication channels. Enforcement actions can include blocking the message, encrypting it, sending a warning to the user, or logging the event for further review. This level of content-aware protection ensures that sensitive data does not inadvertently or maliciously leave the organization, helping meet compliance requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX.

While Information Barriers focus on controlling “who” can communicate internally, DLP addresses “what” is communicated externally or across channels. DLP provides granular control and comprehensive visibility into the flow of sensitive content, allowing organizations to implement precise policies based on data type, recipient, or communication method. It also supports auditing and reporting, which are essential for demonstrating regulatory compliance and maintaining security governance. For organizations handling financial or highly confidential information, DLP is therefore the correct solution for protecting sensitive data from external exposure.

Question 15:

Your organization wants to monitor and analyze potentially risky behavior, such as users downloading large amounts of sensitive data. Which feature best supports this requirement?

A) Insider Risk Management
B) Sensitivity Labels
C) Endpoint DLP
D) Retention Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

 Insider Risk Management assesses user behavior to identify actions that may indicate data theft, unintentional leakage, or malicious intent. It correlates signals such as mass downloads, unusual file access patterns, copying to unauthorized locations, or abnormal data transfers. It applies machine learning models and behavioral analytics to detect patterns indicating risk. Once a risky activity is detected, case creation, review workflows, and recommendations support investigation and resolution. This makes Insider Risk Management ideal for monitoring behavioral indicators rather than enforcing technical restrictions.

Sensitivity Labels provide classification and protection capabilities for documents and emails. While they enforce rights-based restrictions, they do not monitor user behavior or detect suspicious activity patterns. Their focus is on data protection through encryption, not behavioral analytics.

Endpoint DLP (Data Loss Prevention) primarily focuses on monitoring and controlling file activities at the device level. This includes actions such as copying files to external USB drives, printing documents, or attempting to transfer sensitive information through other removable media. While this level of monitoring is essential for preventing specific unauthorized actions, Endpoint DLP operates on a very granular, device-event basis. It identifies discrete events rather than analyzing the broader context of user behavior over time. As a result, it can flag isolated risky actions, but it cannot detect complex patterns of activity that might indicate escalating insider threats or coordinated attempts to exfiltrate data. For instance, if an employee slowly accumulates sensitive information over several weeks or combines minor risky behaviors into a significant security breach, Endpoint DLP alone would likely miss the underlying risk trend.

Retention Labels, on the other hand, serve a very different purpose. They are designed to enforce policies regarding how long information must be preserved to comply with regulatory, legal, or organizational requirements. While retention labels are critical for governance and compliance, they do not provide monitoring capabilities for user behavior. They cannot detect when someone accesses, modifies, or attempts to misuse sensitive content, nor can they provide insights into potentially harmful patterns of interaction with corporate data. Their primary function is preservation and structured information lifecycle management rather than behavioral risk detection.

Insider Risk Management (IRM) fills this critical gap. Unlike Endpoint DLP or retention policies, IRM continuously monitors and analyzes behavioral patterns across users and systems. By leveraging advanced analytics and risk scoring, it can detect unusual or suspicious activities that may indicate insider threats, such as attempts to exfiltrate sensitive data, unusual access to confidential files, or abnormal collaboration behaviors. IRM provides organizations with a more holistic view of potential risks by correlating multiple events and activities, enabling proactive intervention before incidents escalate. This makes Insider Risk Management the most effective choice for organizations seeking to understand, detect, and mitigate internal threats in real time.